Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Eden Village Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Report Bruises of Unknown Origin: A resident with dementia and another resident on anticoagulant therapy were found with unexplained bruising, including a large bruise on an arm and a bruise on the hip. Staff and leadership acknowledged the bruises were of unknown origin and required immediate investigation and reporting, but the events were not reported to the State Survey Agency as required. Family members were not promptly informed of the cause or timing of the injuries.
Failure to Investigate Bruises of Unknown Origin: The facility did not investigate bruising of unknown origin for two residents. One resident with dementia and mobility impairment developed extensive bruising to an arm, and staff and family confirmed the cause was unknown, yet no incident investigation or state report was completed. Another resident on anticoagulant therapy had a new bruise on the hip noted during care, but staff did not ask how it occurred, did not document it, and later acknowledged it should have been investigated and reported.
The facility failed to label food items with 'use by' dates and dispose of outdated food in the refrigerator and freezer, potentially affecting all 52 residents. Items such as chopped bacon, diced tomatoes, and sliced ham were found without proper labeling. The Dietary Manager and Administrator acknowledged the expectation for correct labeling, but the facility did not adhere to its policy on safe food storage.
The facility failed to provide adequate incontinent care for several residents, including those with severe cognitive impairments and histories of UTIs. Observations revealed that CNAs did not perform proper hand hygiene, failed to cleanse all necessary areas, and did not apply moisture barrier creams as required. These deficiencies in care could lead to skin breakdown and increased risk of infection.
The facility failed to adhere to infection control protocols, including proper hand hygiene and equipment sanitization. CNAs did not change gloves or sanitize hands during incontinent care for a resident, and a nurse failed to clean a glucometer between uses on residents in contact isolation. These actions were against the facility's infection control policy.
Two residents at risk for pressure ulcers experienced inadequate care and documentation in a facility. One resident developed a pressure ulcer on the buttock, which was not documented or addressed in her care plan. Another resident, with existing foot ulcers, had a compression stocking dried to her wound without proper dressings, causing pain. The facility's policy on pressure ulcer prevention and treatment was not followed, leading to deficiencies in assessment and intervention.
Failure to Report Bruises of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report bruises of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency for two residents. One resident had diagnoses including UTI, malaise, myalgia, gait and mobility abnormalities, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, ataxia, and dementia, with a Braden score of 14 and need for assistance with personal care and incontinence care. Nursing notes documented new bruising/hematoma on the left posterior forearm and then a discolored, red-to-purple, non-blanchable area involving the right forearm and top of the hand with minimal swelling and occasional pain when the arm was moved or touched. The resident’s family later stated the bruising was a huge area extending from the upper arm to the wrist and that they were not notified when it occurred or how it developed. Facility staff and leadership acknowledged that bruises of unknown origin required immediate investigation and reporting, but the bruising was not investigated or reported to the State Survey Agency. The DON confirmed awareness of the bruising and stated that if the origin was unknown, an incident report should be completed, further investigation should occur immediately, and the event should be reported within the required timeframe. The Administrator also stated that unknown-origin bruising should be investigated immediately and reported, and the RN who notified the Administrator stated the bruise was on the right arm from the knuckles to the elbow and that the physician ordered an x-ray, which was negative. A second resident with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, bone density/structure disorder, and anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation was found to have a purple bruise on the left hip during incontinence care. The bruise measured approximately 4 cm by 4 cm. The CNA who found it did not ask the resident how it occurred, and the LPN who completed the skin assessment also did not ask the resident about the bruise. The medical record contained no documentation of the bruise at the time it was identified, and the family later stated they were only notified the next morning and had no knowledge of an old bruise or its cause. The DON stated the bruise should have been investigated immediately when identified and reported to the State Survey Agency.
Failure to Investigate Bruises of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate bruises of unknown origin for two residents reviewed for injuries. One resident had diagnoses including dementia, gait and mobility abnormalities, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, ataxia, and urinary incontinence, and was documented as moderately impaired with decisions regarding daily tasks. Nursing notes documented new bruising and hematoma on the left posterior forearm and later a discolored, red, purple-lined, non-blanchable area involving the right forearm and top of the hand with minimal swelling and occasional pain when the arm was moved or touched. The resident’s family later stated they observed bruising from the upper arm down to the wrist and had not been notified by facility staff about when or how it occurred. Staff interviews confirmed the bruise was of unknown origin, that an incident report and further investigation were expected, and that no investigation had been completed or reported to the state survey agency. The second resident had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, specified disorders of bone density and structure, and was receiving anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation. During incontinence care, a CNA observed a purple bruise on the left hip measuring approximately 4 cm by 4 cm and told an LPN, who completed a skin assessment. Neither staff member asked the resident how the bruise occurred, and there was no documentation of the bruise in the medical record at the time it was identified. The LPN later stated it was considered an old bruise, but also confirmed no one knew when it was first identified or its origin. The DON later confirmed the bruise on the left hip had been mentioned, could not find documentation about it, and stated it should have been investigated immediately when identified and reported to the state survey agency. The resident’s family stated they were only notified later and had no knowledge of an old bruise, and believed the bruise from a prior fall should have resolved by then. The facility’s abuse policy identified injury of unknown origin as possible abuse and required immediate reporting to the Administrator and timely reporting to the state survey agency, but the bruises for both residents were not investigated as required.
Failure to Properly Label and Dispose of Food Items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly label and dispose of food items in the refrigerator and freezer, which could potentially affect all 52 residents. During an inspection of the walk-in refrigerator, several food items were found without 'use by' dates, including chopped bacon, diced tomatoes, chopped onions, shredded cheese, cut-up eggs, pickle spears, shredded lettuce, sliced ham, half a ham, tropical fruit, red and orange Jello, pitchers of juice and tea, and a gallon of milk. Similarly, the walk-in freezer contained items such as spaghetti sauce, polish sausages, broccoli, meatloaf, pork roast, and soup, all lacking 'use by' dates. Some items, like the meatloaf, showed signs of freezer burn, indicating they were stored beyond their safe consumption period. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that staff had been educated on proper food labeling, which includes marking both the open date and the 'use by' date to ensure food safety. The Administrator also confirmed the expectation for food to be labeled and dated correctly. The facility's policy on the safe storage of food, issued in August 2024, requires all time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods to be stored according to FDA Food Code guidelines. However, the observations during the survey indicate a failure to adhere to these guidelines, leading to the deficiency.
Inadequate Incontinent Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care for four residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident R3, who is severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for toileting, was observed receiving inadequate care. CNAs V29 and V30 did not perform hand hygiene before or during the care process, failed to cleanse all necessary areas, and did not apply a moisture barrier cream as required by the care plan. The resident's brief was wet with urine, and the CNAs did not change gloves or clean all areas of incontinence, leaving the resident at risk for skin breakdown and infection. Resident R52, who has a history of urinary tract infections and severe cognitive impairment, also received inadequate care. CNA V25 did not cleanse the inner thighs or dry the resident after cleaning the groin area. Although gloves were changed and barrier cream was applied, the care was incomplete as the right buttock was not cleansed, and the resident was not dried before a new brief was applied. This incomplete care could contribute to further skin issues and discomfort for the resident. Residents R4 and R41 also experienced deficiencies in their incontinent care. R4, who is always incontinent and dependent on staff, did not have her entire right buttock and inner thighs cleansed during care by CNAs V27 and V28. Similarly, R41, who is frequently incontinent and severely cognitively impaired, did not have her vaginal area, inner thighs, and buttocks properly cleansed, nor was a moisture barrier applied. These failures to follow proper incontinent care procedures as outlined in the facility's policy and care plans highlight significant lapses in the quality of care provided to these residents.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Hand Hygiene and Equipment Sanitization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinent care for a resident. Two CNAs, while providing care to a resident, did not perform hand hygiene before donning gloves and failed to change gloves or sanitize hands throughout the process. The resident's brief was wet with urine, and there was a smear of bowel movement on the wipe used for cleaning. The CNAs did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene at any point during the care, which was against the facility's infection control policy. Additionally, a Registered Nurse failed to sanitize a glucometer between uses on different residents. The nurse placed the glucometer on surfaces without a barrier and did not clean it after use, despite the residents being on contact isolation for a stomach virus. The facility's infection control policy requires that reusable equipment be cleaned and disinfected before use on another person, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Failure to Prevent and Document Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent skin breakdown for two residents, R1 and R10, who were at risk for pressure ulcers. R10, who was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism and Alzheimer's disease, had a care plan that documented her risk for altered skin integrity due to various factors such as incontinence and changes in mobility. Despite interventions like a low air loss mattress and heel protectors, R10 developed a pressure ulcer on her right buttock, which was not documented in her care plan or the facility's wound summary report. Observations revealed redness and darkened discoloration in her buttock region, indicating a lack of adequate monitoring and intervention. R1, admitted with severe protein-calorie malnutrition and other conditions, was also at risk for skin integrity issues. Her care plan noted existing ulcers on her right foot and heel, and she was dependent on staff for various activities of daily living. Despite being on hospice care and having a history of pressure ulcers, R1's Braden Scale assessments were not updated after new ulcers were discovered. During a wound care observation, it was noted that R1's compression stocking was dried to her wound, and no dressings were in place, causing her pain. This indicates a failure in maintaining proper wound care and documentation. The facility's Director of Nursing acknowledged the expectation for wound dressings to remain in place and for new pressure ulcers to be documented and addressed promptly. However, there was a lack of documentation and follow-up on the pressure ulcers identified in both residents. The facility's policy on pressure ulcer prevention and treatment was not adequately followed, as evidenced by the deficiencies in assessment, documentation, and intervention for the residents' skin conditions.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 735 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 18 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Glen Carbon
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Bella Of Edwardsville | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 1 |
| Evercare At Edwardsville | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| Evercare At University | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Meridian Village Care Center | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Manor Court Of Maryville | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Eden Village Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.