Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Crestwood Terrace during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A legally blind resident who required supervision or touching assistance for ambulation and used a white cane was allowed to walk unassisted in a common area while returning a coffee cup. Without staff within arm’s reach and at times without using the cane, the resident bumped into another resident’s wheelchair, nearly fell, and a verbal exchange escalated into a physical altercation in which both residents reported being struck, and one sustained a busted lip. Multiple staff and a peer witness described the blind resident striking the other with a cane, and another resident reported that this visually impaired resident frequently stumbles into others and their wheelchairs. The DON stated that residents needing supervision with ambulation should have staff within arm’s reach, while the administrator acknowledged there was no formal supervision policy and that the incident could have been prevented with supervision, despite facility education materials stating that all staff are expected to monitor residents to prevent incidents and altercations.
A resident with a history of mental illness and risk for abuse was physically and sexually assaulted by another resident with a documented history of aggression and inappropriate behavior. The incident occurred when the assigned CNA left the central shower area unsupervised without arranging coverage, allowing the perpetrator to enter and commit the assault. The lack of required supervision and failure to follow abuse prevention policies resulted in significant harm to the victim.
A resident with significant psychiatric and medical diagnoses was prevented from returning to his room with his personal items and was physically restrained by staff after a dispute over checking his delivered groceries. Staff blocked the resident's access to his room and used a CPI hold to restrain him on the floor until police arrived, actions not consistent with facility policy prohibiting physical abuse and unreasonable confinement.
A resident with a history of aggressive behavior attacked another resident, resulting in the victim being hospitalized for facial trauma. Despite the aggressor's known history of severe mental illness and previous incidents of aggression, the facility failed to implement adequate monitoring and intervention strategies, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with a history of aggressive behavior attacked his roommate after a dispute over a sheet placed on the floor. The incident occurred during lunchtime when staff were occupied, leading to inadequate monitoring. The aggressive resident was sent for psychiatric evaluation, while the other resident received medical attention for a swollen eye.
A resident with dementia, schizophrenia, and epilepsy experienced a fall resulting in a head laceration due to the facility's failure to identify them as a high fall risk after developing a shuffling gait. Despite therapy and restorative programs addressing the gait change, the care plan lacked interventions for fall prevention, and staff were unaware of the resident's increased fall risk.
A resident with a history of mental health issues exhibited increasing aggression and anxiety, but the facility failed to update his care plan with personalized interventions. Despite multiple incidents of aggression and inappropriate behavior, the care plan did not reflect necessary changes to address his specific triggers, leading to a deficiency in care.
A facility failed to prevent and report verbal abuse by an employee towards two residents with schizoaffective disorder. The incidents involved derogatory remarks and disrespectful behavior by a staff member, V6, which were witnessed by other staff but not reported immediately as required by the facility's abuse policy. The administrator was informed of the incidents only after a resident reported them the following day, leading to the suspension and termination of the employee after substantiation of the allegations.
A facility failed to address a pharmacist's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of an anti-depressant for a resident with multiple psychiatric diagnoses. The recommendation was not available in the electronic health record and was not reviewed by the psychiatrist until two months later, with no documentation of clinical contraindications for not reducing the medication.
The facility failed to update the care plans for six residents who tested positive for COVID-19. These residents were placed on droplet precautions, but their care plans lacked necessary interventions. The DON confirmed that care plans should be updated for significant condition changes, such as COVID-19 infections, to include isolation precautions. However, the Care Plan Coordinator was unavailable to perform these updates due to being on vacation.
The facility failed to implement proper infection control protocols for residents with COVID-19, with staff not wearing appropriate PPE and lacking written orders for droplet precautions. Monitoring and assessment of COVID-19 positive residents were inconsistent, and COVID-19 testing for non-positive residents was not conducted as claimed. The facility's policies were generic and lacked a documented COVID surveillance or testing plan.
The facility did not follow its policy to notify a resident's family when the resident was transferred to the hospital. A resident was sent to the hospital without documentation of family notification, as required by the facility's procedure. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation to notify the administrator, DON, and family, but this was not done in this instance.
A resident with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus did not receive their scheduled insulin dose because the medication was unavailable in the cart. The RN acknowledged the missed dose, and the DON confirmed that medications should be administered as per physician orders.
The facility failed to provide effective supervision to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation, resulting in one resident sustaining a subdural hematoma and facial contusions. The incident involved two residents with cognitive impairments and behavioral issues, and staff did not adequately monitor or intervene in time to prevent the escalation.
The facility failed to prevent a physical altercation between two residents, resulting in one resident sustaining visible injuries. During the incident, most staff members were in the dining room and not present to supervise the residents. The attacking resident had a history of aggressive behavior, which was documented in her care plan, but no effective measures were in place to prevent such incidents.
Failure to Supervise Legally Blind Resident During Ambulation Leading to Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision and assistance with ambulation for a resident with severe visual impairment, resulting in an avoidable accident and resident‑to‑resident altercation. One resident (R1) was diagnosed with category five blindness in the right eye, category four blindness in the left eye, and atrophy of the right globe, with the MDS documenting severely impaired vision but cognitively intact status. The MDS Section GG documented that R1 required supervision or touching assistance for walking at least 10 feet, and the care plan noted an ADL self‑care performance deficit related to legal blindness, specifying that R1 used a white cane for ambulation and required assistance with ambulation and transfers as necessary, with an intervention to ensure R1 used his white cane when up and about. Despite this, R1 reported that on the day of the incident he was walking without his cane and no staff were helping him return his coffee cup. On the day of the incident, R1 attempted to return his coffee cup to a kitchen window area and bumped into another resident (R2) seated in a wheelchair, which R1 stated he did not see due to his visual impairment. R1 reported that he almost fell, asked R2 why he was sitting there, and then R2 punched him in the chest, after which R1 hit R2 two or three times with his cane. R1’s written statement indicated he bumped into R2’s chair, tried to apologize, and was verbally cursed at before being hit, leading him to hit back. R2 stated that R1 hit him in the mouth with his cane, causing a busted lip, and denied hitting R1; staff documentation noted a superficial scratch/red raised area on R2’s upper lip consistent with this account. A social service note documented that R1 was seen trying to get past another peer and lost his step, hitting the peer with his cane. Multiple witnesses described a physical altercation between the two residents in a common area without immediate staff intervention at the moment of escalation. A medical records staff member (V6) reported hearing an uproar and seeing R1 striking R2 with his walking stick while R2 covered his head, and an activity aide (V4) reported hearing arguing, seeing R1 (described as legally blind) asking R2 why he was sitting there, hearing R2 respond with profanity, and then observing R1 hit R2 several times in the mouth with his cane. A social service aide (V3) stated he heard cursing and then saw R1 physically altercating with R2, with blood coming from R2’s mouth. Another resident (R3) stated that R1 fell into R2’s wheelchair, became entangled, and that R2 hit R1, after which R1 took his folded cane from his pocket and hit R2; R3 also reported that R1 stumbles over residents and walks into their wheelchairs daily and tends to walk forward rather than backing up when entangled. The DON (V2) stated that if a resident requires supervision with ambulation, staff should be within arm’s reach, and if touching assistance is required, staff should physically touch the resident, but also stated that R1 did not need anyone to walk with him. The administrator (V1) acknowledged there was no written supervision policy and that the incident could have been prevented with supervision, while existing education materials stated that all staff are expected to monitor residents to prevent incidents and altercations.
Failure to Supervise Leads to Resident-on-Resident Sexual and Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its abuse prevention policy and did not protect a resident from both physical and sexual abuse by another resident. The incident occurred when a female resident, who had diagnoses including major depressive disorder and suicidal ideations, went to take a shower in the central shower room. While she was showering, a male co-resident entered the shower room without consent, despite the resident's verbal protests and demands for him to leave. The male resident used physical force, restraining the female resident against the wall, and sexually assaulted her. The assault was interrupted when another resident heard the victim's screams for help, entered the shower room, and then alerted staff, who intervened and separated the two residents. The investigation revealed that staff were expected to monitor the central shower area, especially given the facility's behavioral health population and the known risks associated with certain residents. On the day of the incident, the certified nursing assistant (CNA) assigned to monitor the shower area left his post to use the restroom without arranging for coverage, leaving the area unsupervised. Other staff members confirmed that coverage should have been arranged before leaving the monitoring area, and that there were other staff available to provide coverage if needed. The lack of supervision allowed the male resident, who had a documented history of aggressive and inappropriate behaviors, to access the shower room and commit the assault. Both residents involved had documented mental health diagnoses, and the male resident had a history of aggression and criminal charges, as well as care plans noting socially inappropriate and maladaptive behavior. The female resident was assessed as being at risk for abuse and had a care plan reflecting this risk. The facility's failure to ensure proper supervision and monitoring, as required by their own policies and procedures, directly led to the incident of abuse and resulted in significant physical and psychosocial harm to the victim.
Failure to Follow Abuse Policy: Resident Restrained and Prevented from Accessing Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its abuse policy and procedures when staff restricted a resident from returning to his room with his personal items and physically restrained him against his will. The incident involved a male resident with a history of Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Symptoms, PTSD, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, brain cancer, and suicidal ideations. The resident became upset when staff attempted to check his delivered groceries, leading to a verbal altercation and subsequent physical confrontation. During the incident, staff members blocked the resident from accessing his room with his groceries, and when the resident became agitated and attempted to push past staff, two staff members physically restrained him using a CPI hold and took him to the ground. The resident was held in this position until police arrived. Witness statements confirmed that the resident was pinned to the floor by his arms and legs, and that staff physically intervened to prevent him from returning to his room. The facility's abuse policy prohibits physical abuse, mistreatment, and unreasonable confinement, including separating a resident from their room against their will. Interviews with staff indicated that the physical restraint and prevention of the resident from accessing his room were not in accordance with facility procedures, and that all physical interventions should be a last resort. The facility's final abuse investigation report did not include all relevant witness statements or information about the physical restraint, indicating incomplete documentation of the incident.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident, identified as R2, from physical abuse by another resident, R3, who had a known history of aggressive behavior. R3 attacked R2 without provocation, putting her in a chokehold and punching her in the head and face. This incident resulted in R2 being emergently transferred to the hospital for evaluation of facial trauma. The attack occurred despite R3's documented history of aggressive behavior and previous incidents of physical aggression towards other residents, including an attack on R1 that resulted in a concussion. R3 had a history of severe mental illness, including schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, and was known to exhibit aggressive and inappropriate behavior. Despite this, there were no special monitoring measures in place for R3, and staff were not adequately prepared to manage her behavior. On the day of the incident, R3 was observed talking to herself more than usual, but no interventions were taken to prevent the escalation of her behavior. The facility's staff, including CNAs and psychiatric rehabilitation service aides, were unable to prevent the attack, and there was a delay in responding to the situation. The facility's internal investigation concluded that R2 was attacked as a result of R3 exhibiting symptoms of her mental illness. However, the report highlights a lack of adequate monitoring and documentation of R3's behavior, as well as insufficient interventions to prevent such incidents. The facility's abuse policy emphasizes the importance of creating a secure environment for residents, but the failure to implement effective monitoring and intervention strategies for residents with known aggressive behavior led to this deficiency.
Inadequate Monitoring Leads to Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent a physical altercation between two residents, one of whom had a history of delusions, agitation, and aggressive behavior. The incident occurred when the resident with a history of aggressive behavior placed a sheet on the floor in front of the bathroom entrance, which his roommate moved to access the bathroom. This action led to the aggressive resident hitting his roommate, grabbing him by the shirt, and attempting to pull him out of the room. The altercation escalated into the hallway, where staff intervened to separate the residents. The aggressive resident was subsequently sent to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation, while the other resident was sent to a local hospital for medical evaluation. The facility's failure to adequately monitor the residents, especially during lunchtime when staff were occupied, contributed to the incident. The aggressive resident had a documented history of hallucinations, delusions, and aggressive behavior towards peers, with previous incidents noted in his electronic health record. Despite this history, the facility did not implement sufficient monitoring measures to prevent the altercation. Staff were unaware of the resident's habit of placing a sheet on the floor, which was a precursor to the conflict. The facility's educational in-service on supervision and monitoring of residents emphasized the importance of preventing altercations and monitoring residents, but these measures were not effectively implemented in this case.
Failure to Address Fall Risk Due to Shuffling Gait
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify a resident as a high fall risk after the onset of a shuffling gait and did not implement appropriate interventions in the care plan to address this change. This oversight resulted in the resident attempting to get up unassisted, leading to a fall and a laceration on the forehead that required hospital treatment. The resident, who has a medical history of dementia, schizophrenia, and epilepsy, experienced a fall while trying to use the bathroom, which was not witnessed by staff. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident had been participating in restorative programs and therapy due to a new shuffling gait, which developed four to five months prior to the fall. Despite this, the Director of Nursing (DON) did not update the care plan with interventions for fall safety related to the shuffling gait. The staff, including the nurse and CNA on duty, were unaware of any specific interventions in place before the fall occurred, and the resident was not identified as a high fall risk at the time of the incident. Documentation and assessments, such as the Fall Scale and therapy notes, indicated inconsistencies in recognizing the resident's shuffling gait and fall risk. The care plan lacked documentation of the shuffling gait or any interventions addressing safety for this change. The facility's policy on fall prevention requires evaluations and care plan updates upon changes in condition, which were not adequately followed in this case.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Resident with Aggressive Behavior
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident, identified as R4, who exhibited increasing anxiety, agitation, and verbal and physical aggression. Despite having a history of mental health issues, including Schizoaffective Disorder and Schizophrenia, the care plan was not updated to address these behaviors effectively. The resident's care plan, initiated upon admission, did not include personalized interventions for his specific triggers, such as difficulty managing money and a desire to control others. Throughout his stay, R4 was involved in multiple incidents of aggression and inappropriate behavior, including altercations with peers and staff, and attempts to leave the facility unauthorized. These incidents were documented in progress notes, yet the care plan was not revised to include new interventions or strategies to manage his behavior. The facility's policy requires care plans to be updated within 24 hours of significant behavioral changes, but this was not adhered to in R4's case. Interviews with facility staff revealed that while they recognized the resident's behavioral triggers and the need for updated interventions, these were not reflected in the care plan. The facility's Care Plan Development Policy emphasizes the need for person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timeframes, but this was not achieved for R4, leading to a deficiency in meeting his care needs.
Failure to Prevent and Report Verbal Abuse by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse by an employee towards residents and did not adhere to its abuse policy of immediate reporting. This deficiency involved two residents, R4 and R5, who were affected by the actions of an employee, V6. R4, a resident with schizoaffective disorder, reported an incident where V6 verbally abused them by making derogatory remarks. R5, who also has schizoaffective disorder, complained about a verbal altercation with V6 on a separate occasion. The facility's census at the time was 109 residents, indicating the potential for widespread impact. The incident involving R4 occurred in the social services office, where V6 told R4 to leave, leading to an exchange of insults. V7, another staff member, witnessed the incident but failed to report it immediately to the abuse coordinator or any supervisor, as required by the facility's policy. V8, another witness, confirmed hearing V6's disrespectful behavior and noted that such incidents had occurred before. Despite witnessing the altercation, V8 did not report it immediately, highlighting a breakdown in the facility's internal reporting procedures. The facility's administrator, V1, was only informed of the incident by R4 the following day, and no staff member had reported the incident prior to this. V6 was suspended and later terminated after the facility substantiated the allegations of verbal abuse. The facility's abuse policy mandates immediate reporting and investigation of any abuse allegations, which was not followed in this case, leading to a delay in addressing the abusive behavior and protecting the residents involved.
Failure to Address Pharmacist's Recommendation for Dose Reduction
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address a pharmacist's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of an anti-depressant medication for a resident, and did not ensure that the pharmacist's recommendations were readily available in the resident's electronic health record. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Schizoaffective disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Epilepsy, expressed concerns about being overdosed with medications. The pharmacist's recommendation to reduce the dose of trazodone from 100mg to 75mg was made in February, but the recommendation was not located in the electronic health record and was only available upon request. The psychiatrist responsible for reviewing the medication regimen did not assess the resident until two months after the recommendation was made, and the progress notes did not mention the review of the recommendation. The facility was unable to provide a signed copy of the February Medication Regimen Review by the psychiatrist. The facility's policy on psychotropic medication use emphasizes the need for gradual dose reductions unless clinically contraindicated, but there was no documentation of clinical contraindications for not reducing the medication in the resident's medical record.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Residents with COVID-19
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the care plans of six residents who tested positive for COVID-19, as observed during a survey conducted on August 20, 2024. The residents, identified as R1, R14, R16, R53, R54, and R89, were placed on droplet precautions due to their COVID-19 infections. However, upon reviewing their medical records, it was found that no care plan interventions had been developed for these residents. R89 tested positive on August 12, 2024, while the other residents acquired the infection on August 13, 2024. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the care plan should be updated when there are significant changes in a resident's condition, such as a COVID-19 infection, to include isolation precautions and appropriate nursing interventions. Despite this requirement, the care plans for the affected residents were not updated. The Care Plan Coordinator, responsible for these updates, was unavailable for an interview as she was on vacation. The facility's policy, effective April 2020, mandates that the care planning team review and update care plans when there is a significant change in a resident's condition.
Inadequate COVID-19 Infection Control and Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement proper infection control protocols for residents with COVID-19 infections, affecting all ten residents in the sample reviewed for the Infection Control Prevention Program. During rounds, the Infection Preventionist (IP) was observed entering rooms of residents on droplet precautions without wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves, gowns, and facial shields. Additionally, there were no written orders for droplet precautions in the active physician order sheets for six residents who tested positive for COVID-19, despite the facility's policy requiring such documentation. The facility's infection control practices were further compromised by inconsistent monitoring and assessment of residents with COVID-19. Daily monitoring and assessments were not consistently documented in the residents' electronic charts, with several residents missing entries for multiple days. The facility also failed to conduct COVID-19 testing for non-COVID positive residents twice a week as claimed, with inconsistencies noted in the testing records of several residents. The facility's policies on infection control and outbreak management were found to be generic and not specific to COVID-19, lacking a documented COVID surveillance monitoring or testing plan. The Infection Preventionist and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged the lack of a COVID surveillance monitoring/tracking log and contact tracing log. They also admitted to not having a documented COVID testing plan for residents and employees to investigate the outbreak. The facility's policy required monitoring residents with COVID-19 every four hours for clinical worsening, but this was not consistently implemented. The facility's failure to adhere to CDC guidelines and its own policies contributed to the deficiency in infection control practices.
Failure to Notify Family of Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy regarding the notification of a resident's family when the resident was transferred to the hospital. This deficiency was identified in the case of one resident, R63, out of a sample of 23 residents reviewed for discharge. On March 16, 2024, R63 was sent to the hospital, but the nurses' notes lacked documentation of this transfer. Interviews with staff members, including an RN, the Assistant Director of Nursing, and the Director of Nurses, confirmed that the facility's procedure requires notifying the administrator, the Director of Nursing, and the resident's family when a resident is sent to the hospital. However, this protocol was not followed in R63's case, as there was no record of the family being notified of the hospital transfer.
Failure to Administer Scheduled Insulin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors, specifically affecting one resident in a sample of 23 reviewed for medication administration. On the morning of August 20, 2024, during a medication pass, a registered nurse indicated that a resident would receive their scheduled insulin medication later when the morning tray was available. However, the resident ate breakfast in their room, and the surveyor followed up multiple times regarding the insulin administration. By 11:25 AM, the surveyor was informed that the resident's morning scheduled insulin was not administered as ordered and was recorded as a missed dose. The registered nurse stated that the insulin medication was not given because it was not available in the medication cart. The Director of Nursing confirmed that medication should be administered as scheduled per physician order. The resident has a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications and is at risk for complications, with a care plan that includes diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide effective supervision to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation from escalating into a physical confrontation. This incident involved two residents, both of whom have cognitive impairments and behavioral issues related to their diagnoses. The altercation resulted in one resident sustaining a subdural hematoma and facial contusions, requiring hospitalization. The incident occurred in the resident's room and was not immediately observed by staff, despite the facility's policy of increased monitoring for these residents. The first resident (R1) has a history of mild intellectual disabilities, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, impulsive disorder, and schizophrenia. R1's care plan did not adequately address his behavior of shadow boxing and delusional thoughts of being [NAME] Ali, which had been observed since February 2024. On the day of the incident, R1 approached the second resident (R2) and initiated a physical altercation. R2, who has a history of schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia, responded by hitting R1 back. Staff intervened only after the altercation had escalated, and R1 was found on the floor with a bleeding head injury. Interviews with staff and residents revealed that the monitoring procedures were not effectively implemented. The CNA assigned to the wing was positioned in a way that did not allow for proper observation of the hallway where the incident began. Additionally, the facility's camera system did not capture the altercation, and staff were unaware of the incident until it had already resulted in injury. The facility's failure to update R1's care plan and adequately monitor both residents contributed to the escalation of the altercation and the resulting injuries.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent a physical altercation between two residents, resulting in one resident sustaining visible injuries. Resident R3, who has diagnoses including Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder, was physically attacked by Resident R4, who has a history of anger problems and mood swings. The incident occurred when R3 opened the bathroom door and R4, who was already in the room, began screaming and hitting R3. This resulted in R3 sustaining scratches on her chest, arms, and head, which were later confirmed by multiple staff members and documented in medical records. Staff interviews revealed that during the time of the incident, most staff members, including CNAs, were in the dining room and not present to supervise the residents. V2, a Certified Nursing Assistant, mentioned that R4 thought R3 was involved with her boyfriend, which led to the altercation. V4, the Housekeeping Manager, witnessed the fight and described R4 swinging at R3 with her left arm, while R3 tried to defend herself. The incident was reported to the nursing staff, and R3 was taken to the nurses' station for assessment and treatment of her injuries. Further investigation showed that R4 had a history of aggressive behavior, including verbal and physical altercations, as documented in her care plan. Despite this, there were no effective measures in place to prevent such incidents. The facility's policy on abuse emphasizes the importance of preventing abuse and ensuring a secure environment for residents, but this policy was not effectively implemented in this case. The lack of staff presence and supervision during the incident contributed to the failure to protect R3 from physical abuse by R4.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,691 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 21 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Crestwood
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliya Of Crestwood | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Thryve Of Crestwood | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Elevate Care Palos Heights | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Aperion Care Midlothian | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Avantara Palos Heights | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 29 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Crestwood Terrace.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.