Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Harbours Edge during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with syncope, falls, AKI, and PVD was discharged without a physician’s discharge order in the record, and the discharge planning review was incomplete. The form lacked resident/rep signatures, the discharge initiator and reason were not documented, and it incorrectly listed discharge home even though the resident was actually transferred to an acute rehab facility; the family later received inaccurate discharge papers.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies: The facility failed to prepare and store food in a sanitary manner. Surveyors observed ice buildup and dirty ice in a reach-in freezer, raw fish in reduced oxygen packaging thawing in standing water instead of per manufacturer instructions, a souffle cup resting in thickener on a prep shelf, cleaning tools stored in a way that could contaminate the handles, and a ware washer rinse cycle that did not reach the 180°F sanitizing temperature listed on the machine.
A deficiency was cited when a facility area was found to contain accident hazards and lacked adequate supervision to prevent accidents, resulting in an unsafe environment for residents.
Surveyors found that two residents did not receive required infection control measures: one with a chronic wound did not have Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) implemented, lacked an EBP care plan, and staff performed wound care without a gown; another on contact precautions had an RN start IV antibiotics wearing only gloves, not a gown, despite posted precautions. These lapses were confirmed by facility leadership.
A resident on Heparin fell, hit her head, and was found on the floor near her room door, but staff did not promptly notify the RN/MD or complete a timely assessment. The LPN said the resident reported hitting her head, yet this was not communicated, and the charge RN did not assess the resident until the daughter arrived. The resident later required hospital transfer and was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma and fractures of the pelvis and hip.
Failure to provide and document indwelling urinary catheter care for two residents. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and neurogenic bladder had no MD order for catheter care and no POC documentation, despite staff stating CNAs complete and document the care. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment and flaccid neuropathic bladder also had no order or documentation for catheter care, and was observed in bed with the catheter drainage bag hanging from the bed without a privacy cover.
Pureed Vegetable Preparation Did Not Follow Recipe Requirements: Food was not prepared to preserve the nutritive value of pureed brussels sprouts for 7 of 7 residents on pureed diets. Surveyors observed brussels sprouts at 170 degrees F being held for later pureeing, and staff described a process of cooking, cooling, pureeing, reheating, and then holding the product for several hours before lunch. The Culinary Director acknowledged the sprouts could be held more than 2.5 to 3 hours before service and potentially cooked and reheated multiple times.
Meal tickets and trays did not reflect resident food preferences for three sampled residents. One resident with intact cognition said his meal ticket was not circled with his choices, another resident with intact cognition was upset that Vanilla Ice Cream was crossed out even though it was available in the kitchen, and a third resident with moderate cognitive impairment received a tray missing the Grilled American Cheese Sandwich listed on the ticket. The CDM stated staff are trained to read meal tickets and that tray line audits are performed.
A resident with dysphagia, dementia, and hyperlipemia had physician orders for a NAS, mechanical soft diet with thin liquids and no straws, but was observed receiving a regular-texture lunch and drinking water with a straw. The SLP said the resident tolerated a mechanical soft diet and that the diet change had been entered and communicated to kitchen staff, but the resident stated she had not been told not to use a straw, and the meal ticket still showed a regular diet with thin liquids.
A resident with severe protein-calorie malnutrition did not receive timely nutritional interventions at an LTC facility. Despite a poor appetite and significant weight loss, the Comprehensive Nutritional Assessment was delayed, and Ensure Plus supplements were not administered promptly. The resident's weight was not recorded as required, leading to continued weight loss. Interviews revealed a lack of urgency in addressing the nutritional needs of high-risk residents.
The facility failed to change nebulizer tubing weekly for two residents, as required by its infection prevention policy. Observations showed that the tubing for both residents was not changed for over a week, and there was no documentation of changes in the Treatment Administration Record or Progress Notes. Interviews with staff confirmed the tubing should be changed weekly, but this was not done, leading to a deficiency in respiratory care.
Staff at the facility failed to follow hand hygiene protocols during food service, as observed in multiple instances. Dietary assistants and a CNA served food and beverages without washing hands, and the dietary manager also neglected hand hygiene. Despite prior education on hand hygiene, these practices did not align with the facility's policy or federal requirements.
A facility failed to accurately document midline dressing changes for a resident, as required by their policy. The resident had orders for weekly dressing changes, but records showed only one documented change despite observations of multiple changes. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in documentation practices, leading to a deficiency in maintaining accurate medical records.
The facility failed to implement proper PPE protocols for residents on Transmission-Based Precautions. A resident on Contact Precautions was assisted by staff who did not adhere to PPE guidelines, including improper mask use and lack of hand hygiene. Another resident on Droplet Precautions for COVID-19 had staff enter their room without appropriate PPE or hand hygiene. Additionally, a resident requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions was exposed to staff non-compliance, as housekeeping personnel failed to sanitize hands and improperly handled PPE.
The facility failed to respond promptly to call lights for three residents, resulting in significant delays in assistance. One resident experienced wait times exceeding 95 minutes, while another expressed concerns about emergency situations. Additionally, a resident struggled with a broken call light and was unable to reach another, highlighting issues with accessibility and staff response procedures.
Incomplete Discharge Documentation and Missing Physician Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation of a physician’s discharge order and failed to ensure the Discharge Planning Review Assessment was completed accurately for one resident who was discharged from the facility. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including syncope and collapse, unspecified injury of face, history of falling, acute kidney injury, and peripheral vascular disease. A Brief Interview of Mental Status showed a score of 15.0, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Record review showed there was no physician’s order for discharge in the medical record, and the discharge planning assessment signed by the Social Worker was incomplete, with no resident or representative signature or date, no answer for who initiated the discharge, and no reason for discharge documented. The assessment also indicated the resident was discharged home/community, but the family member stated the resident was not discharged home and was instead admitted to another facility. The family member reported being told the resident’s Medicare would not cover the rehab stay and that an alternate plan was arranged for admission to another facility, but the discharge papers later mailed to her were inaccurate. The DON confirmed the resident was discharged to a rehabilitation facility, and the Admissions Coordinator clarified that the resident was discharged to an acute rehabilitation center within a hospital. Staff interviews showed the charge nurse believed the Social Worker, ADON, or Administrator typically initiated discharges, and the ADON stated the discharge planning review should have been completed at the time of discharge, that no physician’s discharge order was in the record, and that there were no signed discharge papers from the resident.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve and prepare foods in a sanitary manner in accordance with standards for food safety professionals. During the kitchen tour, an accumulation of ice was observed in the cooling unit in the back of the reach-in freezer near the kitchen exit, and dirty, discolored ice was noted on the floor of the reach-in freezer. In the walk-in cooler, a full-sized 2-inch deep hotel pan containing raw fish in reduced oxygen packaging was resting in standing water, despite the packaging instructions stating to remove the fish from the package and thaw under refrigeration immediately before consumption. Additional food safety concerns were observed in the kitchen and support areas. A 5-quart container of thickener stored on a shelf over a food preparation table contained a 2-ounce souffle cup with no handle resting directly in the product. In the janitorial closet, cleaning implements including brooms and a squeegee were stored in a manner that contaminants would run down the handles of the items. The mechanical ware washing machine also did not reach the 180 degrees F rinse temperature listed on the data plate for hot water sanitizing, with the gauge reading between 155 and 160 degrees F.
Failure to Maintain Safe Environment and Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified due to the failure to ensure that a specific area within the facility was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. The report notes that the environment did not meet safety standards, which resulted in the presence of accident hazards and insufficient oversight to protect residents from potential harm. No additional details regarding the specific hazards, the number of residents affected, or their medical conditions at the time of the deficiency are provided in the report.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier and Contact Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Contact Precautions as required for two residents. For one resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer on the right heel and severe cognitive impairment, there was no physician's order for EBP, no EBP care plan in place, and no EBP signage or isolation cart with personal protective equipment (PPE) near the resident's room. During wound care, the registered nurse performed the procedure without donning a gown, and only gloves were used. The infection preventionist confirmed that there was no EBP care plan for this resident, despite the presence of a chronic wound that met the criteria for EBP according to facility policy. For another resident on contact precautions due to a recent diagnosis, the required infection control measures were not fully implemented. Although a sign indicating contact precautions was posted on the resident's door, a registered nurse was observed starting an intravenous medication while wearing gloves but not a gown, contrary to CDC guidelines and facility policy, which require both gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident or their environment. These deficiencies were confirmed through observations, interviews, and record reviews. The administrator and director of nursing acknowledged the findings during the survey. The failures were directly related to lapses in following established infection prevention and control policies, including the absence of required care plans, signage, and proper use of PPE during resident care activities.
Failure to Report Head Injury and Assess Resident After Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from neglect when staff did not promptly inform medical staff that the resident, who was receiving Heparin for DVT prophylaxis, had hit her head during an unwitnessed fall and did not receive a timely nursing assessment. Resident #58 had intact cognition on admission, required substantial assistance to stand, and was dependent for walking 10 feet. Her diagnoses included an unspecified head injury, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, and surgical aftercare following nervous system surgery. On the day of the fall, the resident was found on the floor on her back near the front door of her room with her head touching the door. Staff H, the assigned LPN, stated the resident said she got up to go to the bathroom, did not tell anyone, and said she hit her head. Staff H stated the resident was assisted off the floor by four staff members and placed back in bed, and later complained of leg pain. Staff H and Staff J stated x-rays were ordered, but Staff J said she did not notify the physician or assess the resident. Staff I, the charge RN, stated she did not know the resident had hit her head and did not assess the resident until the daughter arrived at the facility. Staff H stated she had not told anyone the resident hit her head and could not explain why. She also stated she performed neuro checks and vital signs, but there was no evidence of either in the medical record. The attending physician stated he expected to be notified of significant injuries, including head injury or hitting the head, and the hospital record later showed the resident was diagnosed with a traumatic 3-millimeter subdural hematoma, a displaced fracture of the right inferior pubic ramus, and a displaced subtrochanteric fracture of the right hip, followed by ORIF of the right hip.
Failure to Provide and Document Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter care was performed and documented for two residents reviewed for catheter care. Resident #20 had diagnoses including Cognitive Communication Deficit and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, and the MDS documented severe cognitive impairment. The physician’s orders contained no order for indwelling urinary catheter care, and the MAR/TAR/CNA tasks/progress notes from 07/01/25 to 07/07/25 contained no documentation that catheter care had been provided. The care plan identified the resident as having a urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder and included an intervention for care and treatment per current MD orders. During interviews, an RN stated CNAs perform catheter care and document it in point of care, and a CNA stated she documents urinary catheter care in point of care; however, staff acknowledged there was no documentation in point of care and no order for urinary catheter care. Resident #42 had diagnoses including Displaced Segmental Fracture of Shaft of Humerus, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Flaccid Neuropathic Bladder, and the MDS documented severe cognitive impairment. The physician’s orders from 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 contained no order for indwelling urinary catheter care, and the MAR/TAR/CNA tasks/progress notes contained no documentation of catheter care being provided. The care plan identified the resident as having a urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder and included care and treatment per current MD orders. On observation, the resident was lying in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag hanging from the side of the bed furthest from the door with no privacy cover.
Pureed Vegetable Preparation Did Not Follow Recipe Requirements
Penalty
Summary
Food was not prepared in a manner to preserve the nutritive value of pureed foods, affecting 7 of 7 residents with orders for pureed diets, including Residents #7, 28, 21, 11, and 20. The facility’s recipe for brussels sprouts directed staff to cook the vegetables to an internal temperature of 145 degrees F and then follow a separate pureed recipe that required additional cooking time, draining liquid, blending until smooth, adding broth and butter, thickening to a mashed potato consistency, and reheating to greater than 165 degrees F before holding at greater than 140 degrees F for no more than 2 hours. During the kitchen tour, surveyors observed a 1/6th sized 6-inch deep pan of brussels sprouts with an internal temperature of 170 degrees F, and Staff F stated the sprouts were being held to be pureed for lunch that day. When questioned about the process, Staff F stated the brussels sprouts would be cooked for 6 minutes to 165 degrees F, cooled, placed in a food processor, pureed, mixed with vegetable broth or thickener as needed, reheated to 165 degrees F, and then held until plating for the lunch meal at 11:00 AM and served at 12:00 PM. The Culinary Director acknowledged that the sprouts would be held for more than 2.5 to 3 hours before being served and could be cooked and reheated multiple times prior to service. Temperatures were taken with the facility’s calibrated metal stemmed probe thermometer.
Meal Tickets and Trays Did Not Match Resident Food Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident preferences for 3 of 3 sampled residents observed during dining observations. Resident #60, who was admitted with diagnoses of injury of head and syncope and collapse and had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition, was observed during lunch with a meal ticket that was not circled for selection of choices. The resident stated he was very unhappy because he did not get what he wanted and said the meal ticket was not his because it was not circled with his choices. Resident #18, admitted with diagnoses of displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur and syncope and aftercare following joint replacement surgery and with a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognition, was observed with a meal ticket listing Vanilla Ice Cream crossed out with N/A next to it. She stated she was frustrated because she chose 2 vegetables so she could have her ice cream, and a tour of the kitchen revealed Vanilla Ice Cream was available. Resident #43, admitted with diagnoses of other seizures and hypotension and with a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with a meal ticket for Monte [NAME], Grilled American Cheese Sandwich on [NAME], and Diced Mango, but the tray contained Monte [NAME] and diced cantaloupe with no Grilled American Cheese Sandwich. The Certified Dietary Manager stated staff are trained to read meal tickets properly and that tray line audits are conducted, with an expeditor checking that everything on the meal ticket is on the tray before delivery.
Incorrect Therapeutic Diet and Straw Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the correct therapeutic diet as prescribed for a resident with dysphagia, unspecified dementia, and hyperlipemia. The resident had physician orders for a no added salt diet, mechanical soft texture, thin liquids, and no drinking fluids with straws. Speech therapy documented that the resident should be downgraded to a mechanical soft diet and that nursing should be educated about the diet change. The resident stated she was on a mechanical soft diet because she had difficulty swallowing food, and the speech language pathologist described her as having a mild oropharyngeal swallowing disorder and needing a mechanical soft diet to make eating safer and easier. Despite these orders and recommendations, the resident was observed receiving a regular-texture lunch meal that included a whole, uncut hot dog, bun, whole sweet potato, coleslaw, and broccoli and cheese soup, and the meal ticket also showed a regular texture diet with thin liquids. The resident was observed drinking water from a cup with a straw on multiple occasions, even though the physician order prohibited straws. The resident stated she had not been educated or told by staff not to use a straw. The speech language pathologist reported that the diet change had been entered into the electronic system and communicated to kitchen staff, but could not recall which nursing staff were informed and stated it may have been after the lunch meal and before the dinner meal.
Failure to Provide Timely Nutritional Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely nutritional interventions for a resident identified as having severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Upon admission, the resident was noted to have a poor appetite, consuming less than 50% of meals, and expressed a preference for Ensure Plus supplements. Despite these indicators, the Comprehensive Nutritional Assessment was not completed until seven days after admission, and the initial order for Ensure Plus was delayed until eight days post-admission. The resident's weight was not recorded promptly, with the first weight taken six days after admission, and no subsequent weights were documented as per the physician's orders. The resident's medical history included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, and weakness, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 17.0, categorizing them as underweight. The resident's condition was further complicated by recent significant weight loss and a history of decreased food intake. Despite these risk factors, the facility did not implement immediate nutritional interventions, such as increasing the frequency of Ensure Plus supplements, until 12 days after admission. This delay in addressing the resident's nutritional needs contributed to continued weight loss, as evidenced by a further reduction in weight to 120 pounds and a BMI of 16.1. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of urgency in assessing and addressing the nutritional needs of high-risk residents. The Clinical Dietitian acknowledged that the initial recommendation of Ensure Plus once a day was insufficient to meet the resident's needs. The facility's policy required weights to be taken on admission, the second day, weekly for four weeks, and monthly thereafter, but these procedures were not followed. The resident's wife expressed concern over the weight loss and emphasized the importance of receiving Ensure supplements daily, highlighting the facility's failure to meet the nutritional requirements of the resident in a timely manner.
Failure to Change Nebulizer Tubing Weekly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy regarding the weekly change of nebulizer tubing for two residents, leading to a deficiency in respiratory care. The policy, revised in November 2020, mandates that nebulizer administration setups be discarded every seven days to prevent infection. However, observations and record reviews revealed that the nebulizer tubing for two residents, identified as Resident #45 and Resident #153, was not changed weekly as required. Resident #45, who was admitted with conditions including surgical aftercare and a Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection, was observed with nebulizer tubing dated 06/26/24, which was not changed until 07/08/24. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and Progress Notes for this resident from 07/01/24 to 07/04/24 showed no documentation of tubing changes, despite physician orders for regular nebulizer treatments. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the tubing should be changed weekly, typically by the night shift, and documented on the TAR. Similarly, Resident #153, with a history of lung cancer and shortness of breath, was observed with nebulizer tubing dated 06/26/24, which was not changed until 07/08/24. The TAR and Progress Notes for this resident from 07/01/24 to 07/07/24 also lacked documentation of tubing changes. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and nursing staff confirmed the weekly change policy and the lack of documentation for these residents. The deficiency was identified due to the absence of orders and documentation for the nebulizer tubing changes for both residents.
Failure in Hand Hygiene During Food Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility's staff failed to adhere to hand hygiene protocols during food service, as observed in five separate dining observations. Staff members, including dietary assistants and a certified nursing assistant, were seen serving food and beverages to residents without washing their hands or using hand sanitizers. Specific instances included a dietary assistant serving juices and ice water cups while touching the rims with bare hands, and another assistant serving soup without prior handwashing. Additionally, a certified nursing assistant set up lunch trays for residents without practicing hand hygiene before or after the task. Further observations revealed that the dietary manager also neglected hand hygiene practices. She was seen touching kitchen doors and serving soup and meals to residents without washing her hands. Despite previous education on hand hygiene provided by the Infection Preventionist in May 2024, these lapses in protocol were still evident. Interviews with staff indicated that some were aware of the hand hygiene requirements, yet the observed practices did not align with the facility's policy or federal food safety requirements.
Inaccurate Documentation of Midline Dressing Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records concerning the documentation of Midline dressing changes for a resident with a midline/central line. The facility's policy requires that all procedures and treatments, including dressing changes, be documented with specific details such as the date, time, and the name of the individual performing the care. However, for one resident, the documentation was inconsistent and incomplete, leading to a deficiency in maintaining accurate medical records. The resident in question was admitted with diagnoses including surgical aftercare and a Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection. The physician's orders specified that the midline dressing should be changed every Tuesday night shift. However, a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for July revealed that the only documented dressing change occurred on the second of the month, despite observations indicating that the dressing was changed on other dates without proper documentation. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed discrepancies in the documentation process. The DON acknowledged that if a dressing change was performed, it should have been documented, but there was no record of the change on the observed dates. An agency nurse also admitted to possibly documenting the dressing change late, which contributed to the inconsistency in the records. This lack of accurate documentation violated the facility's policy and professional standards for maintaining medical records.
Failure to Implement PPE Protocols for Residents on Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and sustain appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) protocols for residents on Transmission-Based Precautions. Resident #26, who was on Contact Precautions due to an ESBL infection, was observed with staff not adhering to PPE guidelines. Staff F, a Private Aide, was seen with a mask improperly worn and did not practice hand hygiene while assisting the resident with drinks. Additionally, Staff H, a CNA, entered the resident's room without wearing gloves or a gown and did not perform hand hygiene before or after handling items in the room. Resident #253, on Droplet Precautions for a positive COVID-19 test, was also subject to improper PPE use. Staff A, a Supervisor Lifestyle, entered the resident's room without wearing a gown or gloves and did not perform hand hygiene before or after touching surfaces and linens. This lack of adherence to PPE protocols was observed despite the presence of Droplet Precaution signage outside the resident's room. Resident #261, who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to multiple medical conditions and devices, was also affected by staff non-compliance. Staff O, a Housekeeping Personnel, entered the resident's room without sanitizing her hands and was observed touching various items while wearing gloves, which she then used to dig into her personal clothing pockets. This behavior occurred despite the Enhanced Barrier Precaution signage and the staff's training on these precautions.
Delayed Call Light Responses and Inaccessible Call Lights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for three residents, leading to significant delays in assistance. Resident #6, who is cognitively intact but dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs), experienced multiple instances where call light response times exceeded 30 minutes, with one instance reaching over 95 minutes. Despite reporting the issue to staff, no corrective action was taken. Resident #29, also cognitively intact and dependent on staff for ADLs, reported similar delays, expressing concern about the potential lack of assistance in emergencies. Resident #204, who requires substantial assistance for ADLs, also experienced prolonged wait times for call light responses, with several instances exceeding 30 minutes. The resident and his spouse reported dissatisfaction with the care provided, noting that staff would sometimes turn off the call light without providing immediate assistance. Observations confirmed that staff did not return promptly to assist the resident, even when the call light was activated. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that the call light was functional and within reach for Resident #254. The resident, who is cognitively intact, was observed struggling to use a broken call light and was unable to reach another call light clipped to the bed sheets. Despite attempts to get staff attention, the resident's needs were not addressed, and staff failed to ensure the call light was accessible. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in call light response procedures, with some staff unaware of the system's functionality and others not adhering to the expected response times.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 293 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Delray Beach
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cascades Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Abbey Delray South | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Yamato Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| The Terrace Of Delray Beach Nursing And Rehabilita | 3.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Isles Of Boynton Nursing And Rehab Center | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Harbours Edge.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.