Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Aviata At The Sea - Pompano Beach during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple mental health diagnoses was hospitalized twice for crisis behaviors and readmitted to the facility without a new PASARR Level I screening being completed, as required by policy. The only PASARR Level I on file was dated prior to these hospitalizations, and Social Services did not document or assess the resident's status following the [NAME] Act discharges.
A resident with a history of mental health disorders and HIV exhibited increased violent and aggressive behaviors, including spitting, kicking, and hitting staff, as well as refusing medications. Despite multiple documented incidents and psychiatric evaluations noting worsening symptoms, the care plan was not updated to address these new behaviors, and interventions remained focused only on medication refusal. Staff interviews confirmed that the care plan was not revised to reflect the resident's current needs.
The facility failed to maintain food safety standards, with improper storage of opened food items and a malfunctioning dishwasher not reaching required sanitization temperatures. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the issues, and the kitchen manager noted recent maintenance on the dishwasher, which remained inadequate.
The facility failed to dispose of refuse in a sanitary manner, as observed during a survey. The garbage area near the back of the main kitchen was found littered with debris, including dirty gloves, food debris, and other refuse. Overflowing garbage bins and scattered debris were also noted around the main dumpster area. Interviews with the Kitchen Manager and the Administrator revealed a lack of clarity regarding responsibility for maintaining cleanliness in the garbage area.
A facility failed to provide dignified eating assistance and privacy during personal care for two residents with severe cognitive impairments. A hospice aide stood while feeding a resident without proper education on maintaining dignity, and another resident was left uncovered during care without privacy curtains. The facility lacked specific policies for feeding assistance and had not replaced missing privacy curtains.
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment, with deficiencies observed in 8 out of 39 rooms. Issues included peeling toilet seats, holes in walls, broken window cranks, and missing privacy curtains. Interviews revealed compromised privacy for residents, with staff acknowledging the problem. The facility's DES had ordered new curtains but had not received them, indicating a delay in addressing the issues.
A facility failed to include catheter care in the baseline care plan for a resident admitted with a Foley catheter. The resident, with mild cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, was unsure of the catheter's purpose. The MDS coordinator acknowledged the omission, noting the baseline care plan was effective until the comprehensive care plan could be printed.
The facility failed to create personalized care plans for four residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific needs. A resident with severe cognitive impairment exhibited combative behavior without a care plan addressing it. Another resident experienced pain during care, leading to an abuse allegation, but the pain was not addressed in the care plan until after the incident. A third resident on anticoagulant therapy lacked a care plan for the medication, and a fourth resident on contact precautions did not have a care plan for these precautions.
A resident with cognitive impairment did not receive timely incontinence care due to fear of mistreatment by a CNA, resulting in a soaked brief. Another resident receiving hospice care for Wernicke's encephalopathy lacked a physician order for hospice services, as acknowledged by the DON.
The facility failed to timely identify and address severe weight loss in three residents, leading to deficiencies in nutritional care. One resident experienced an 8.08% weight loss in a month without consistent weight monitoring. Another resident had a 6.6% weight loss with delayed RD assessment due to hospitalization. A third resident showed a 12.8% weight loss with inconsistencies in receiving prescribed supplements and weight monitoring.
A facility failed to follow physician's orders for tube feeding and its own weight policy, leading to weight loss in a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident's tube feeding was inconsistently administered, providing insufficient caloric intake. Additionally, the facility did not record a new readmission weight, contributing to a 4.45% weight loss over a month.
A facility failed to follow a physician's fluid restriction orders for a dialysis resident, providing 16 ounces of coffee instead of the prescribed 6 ounces during breakfast. Despite clear meal ticket instructions and the resident's awareness of her restrictions, the kitchen manager honored the resident's preference for more coffee, leading to non-compliance with the care plan.
A facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff, resulting in delayed care for several residents. One resident, with paralysis and severe arthritis, was improperly repositioned by a CNA without assistance, causing pain and fear. Another resident experienced meal delays due to needing assistance, while a third resident reported waiting hours for incontinent care. These incidents highlight the facility's staffing issues affecting resident care.
The facility did not follow its menu portion sizes for a Regular diet, affecting 39 residents. The menu specified a 2-ounce portion of roast pork, but observations showed servings of 1 and 1.5 ounces. The Dietary Manager and Account Manager confirmed the required portion size, yet the deficiency was noted.
Two residents did not receive meals according to their preferences and dietary needs. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm had missing items on their meal tray, while another resident with mild cognitive impairment and diabetes received an incomplete meal. The kitchen manager acknowledged these errors, highlighting a lapse in the facility's meal preparation process.
The facility did not conduct quarterly QAPI meetings as required, with the last meeting held in December 2024. A meeting in March 2025 lacked attendance from the Medical Director, and no sign-in sheet was available. The Administrator, who started in March, confirmed the absence of the Medical Director at the March meeting.
The facility failed to follow infection control guidelines, with staff not wearing gowns during personal and wound care for a resident with a pressure ulcer, and during medication administration for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). PPE was not readily accessible, and contact precautions were not followed per physician orders for another resident. Staff were unaware of gown requirements, and PPE was not available on the floor, leading to deficiencies in infection control practices.
The facility failed to adhere to infection control standards for two residents with midline catheters. A resident who was cognitively intact and another with severe cognitive impairment both had midline catheters observed without caps, leaving the lines open to the bloodstream. An LPN confirmed the lines should have been capped, and the DON acknowledged the oversight.
Failure to Complete PASARR Level I Screening After Psychiatric Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level I screening was completed for a resident with multiple mental health diagnoses following two hospitalizations for crisis states involving violent and aggressive behaviors. The resident, who had a history of Major Depressive Disorder, Mood Disorder, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressive Mood, Bipolar Disorder, and HIV, was admitted, discharged under a [NAME] Act due to behavioral crises, and subsequently readmitted to the facility on two occasions. Despite these significant events and changes in the resident's mental status, the only PASARR Level I on file was dated prior to the hospitalizations, and no new PASARR Level I was completed upon the resident's readmissions. Review of the facility's policy indicated that it is the responsibility of the center, specifically the Social Services department, to ensure that appropriate PASARR screenings are conducted and documented prior to admission or readmission, and that significant changes trigger updated screenings. Interviews with the Director of Social Services and the regional nurse confirmed that the required PASARR Level I was not completed after the resident's returns from the hospital, and there was no documentation or assessment by Social Services regarding the [NAME] Act discharges during the relevant period.
Failure to Revise Care Plan for Resident with Escalating Aggressive Behaviors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident who exhibited recent increases in violent and aggressive behaviors towards other residents and staff. The resident, who had a history of major depressive disorder, mood disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressive mood, bipolar disorder, and HIV disease, demonstrated behaviors such as spitting at and kicking staff, hitting others with her wheelchair, and refusing medications. Despite these significant behavioral changes, the care plan was not updated to address the new or escalating behaviors, and interventions continued to focus only on medication refusal. Documentation showed that the resident had multiple behavioral incidents, including spitting on a nurse, kicking staff, and being combative during morning care. Psychiatry progress notes indicated increased symptoms of bipolar disorder, including mania, psychosis, and refusal to follow staff recommendations. The resident was also noted to have been agitated, aggressive toward her roommate, and required a room change. Despite these documented changes, the last interdisciplinary team meeting and care plan revision occurred prior to the escalation of these behaviors, and the care plan did not reflect the resident's current needs or interventions for the aggressive behaviors. Interviews with facility staff revealed that although behavioral changes were discussed in daily clinical meetings, the care plan was not revised to address the resident's increased aggression. The MDS coordinator and regional nurse both acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated, with the social services director identified as responsible for ensuring care plan revisions. However, no updates were made to the care plan to reflect the resident's behavioral changes and required interventions.
Food Safety and Equipment Maintenance Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to food safety requirements during a survey of the main kitchen. During the inspection, it was observed that a round garbage can without a lid was present in the food production area, which the Dietary Manager acknowledged. Additionally, the walk-in refrigerator contained several opened bags of food items, including boiled eggs, grapes, cucumbers with white spots and a mold-like substance, raw chicken pieces, raw fish pieces, and raw bacon. There was also a bag of raw meals that was neither dated nor labeled, indicating improper food storage practices that could lead to cross-contamination. Further observations revealed that the hot temperature dishwasher machine was not reaching the necessary high-temperature ranges for sanitization. The rinse cycle was consistently at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the wash cycle varied between 145 and 160 degrees Fahrenheit, failing to meet the required 180 degrees Fahrenheit for the final rinse. The kitchen manager mentioned that maintenance had recently checked the dishwasher, but it was still not functioning correctly, indicating a lapse in ensuring proper equipment maintenance and food safety standards.
Improper Disposal of Refuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to dispose of refuse in a sanitary manner, as observed during a survey. The facility's policy on Solid Waste Management, dated 11/30/2014, mandates that solid waste be handled and disposed of to ensure a safe and sanitary environment. However, during an observation on 03/31/25, the garbage area near the back of the main kitchen was found littered with debris, including dirty gloves, food debris, cans of soda, bottled water, medicine cups, supplements, and other refuse. A subsequent observation on 04/1/25 revealed three garbage bins overflowing with garbage bags, with dirty gloves and other debris scattered around the main dumpster area. Interviews with the Kitchen Manager and the Administrator indicated a lack of clarity regarding responsibility for maintaining cleanliness in the garbage area, as the Kitchen Manager was unaware of who was responsible for ensuring the area was cleaned and contained.
Deficiencies in Dignified Care and Privacy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide eating assistance in a dignified manner for a resident with severe cognitive impairment who required substantial assistance with feeding. The hospice aide assisting the resident was observed standing while feeding, rather than being at the resident's eye level, which is considered undignified. The hospice aide admitted to standing during feeding based on her comfort and confirmed that she had not received any education from the facility staff or hospice nurse regarding proper feeding assistance and maintaining resident dignity. The facility lacked a specific policy related to assistance with feeding and activities of daily living. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure privacy during personal care for another resident with severe cognitive impairment who required maximal assistance for bathing and dressing. During an observation, the resident was uncovered, exposing his adult brief and lower extremities, without privacy curtains or window blinds drawn. The staff member providing care was unaware of when the privacy curtains were removed, and the Director of Environmental Services confirmed that the privacy curtain had been ordered but not yet replaced. The lack of privacy was acknowledged by the staff, who confirmed the importance of providing privacy during care.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies observed in 8 out of 39 rooms. Observations included a peeling toilet seat, a hole in the bathroom wall filled with gloves and hair, and black spots on the shower floor. Additionally, several rooms had issues with doors, such as laminate coming off, doors not closing properly, and loose baseboards. Some rooms were missing essential items like room separator curtains, and there were broken window crank handles and stained curtains. Interviews with residents and staff revealed that privacy was compromised due to missing or inadequate privacy curtains. A resident expressed the importance of having privacy during bathing, and a CNA confirmed the lack of privacy curtains, stating that housekeeping was aware of the issue. The facility's Director of Environmental Services (DES) had ordered new cubicle curtains but had not received them, indicating a delay in addressing the deficiency. These observations and interviews highlight the facility's failure to provide a safe and homelike environment, impacting the residents' comfort and privacy.
Failure to Document Catheter Care in Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address catheter care in the baseline care plan for a resident who was admitted with a Foley catheter. The resident, who has mild cognitive impairment, was admitted with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Urinary Tract Infection, and Dysuria. During an interview, the resident expressed uncertainty about the reason for having a catheter, indicating a lack of communication or documentation regarding his catheter care. A review of the resident's baseline care plan showed no documentation about the Foley catheter, which was acknowledged by the MDS coordinator as an oversight. The coordinator noted that the baseline care plan was currently effective, as the comprehensive care plan could not yet be printed, and confirmed that the catheter should have been included in the baseline care plan.
Failure to Initiate Personalized Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to initiate personalized care plans for four residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific needs. Resident #48, who has severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for personal care, exhibited combative behavior during care. However, there was no care plan addressing these aggressive tendencies, despite staff being aware of the behavior. Interviews with staff revealed that the MDS Coordinator would only create a care plan for combative behavior after an incident occurred, rather than proactively addressing the issue. Resident #74, with a slight cognitive impairment, experienced pain during care, which led to an allegation of physical abuse by a CNA. The care plan for pain was only initiated after the incident, despite the resident's known history of expressing pain during care. Staff interviews indicated that the resident often screamed in pain during care, yet the care plan did not address this issue until after the incident was reported. Resident #2, who is on anticoagulant therapy, did not have a care plan addressing the use of Rivaroxaban, despite having a physician's order for the medication. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the oversight, as the care plan only mentioned medication for Peripheral Vascular Disease. Resident #31, who was on contact precautions due to a bacterial infection, did not have a care plan for these precautions. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of documentation for a repeat urine culture and the continuation of contact precautions, which were not reflected in the care plan.
Deficiencies in Incontinence Care and Hospice Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions, including epilepsy and anxiety disorder. The resident, who required assistance with toileting, reported that her adult brief was not changed from 11:00 PM until the morning, resulting in a soaked brief. The resident expressed fear of mistreatment after witnessing a staff member, a CNA, verbally mistreat her roommate. The CNA denied the resident was wet and did not change the brief, while the LPN confirmed the brief was wet during a side-by-side observation. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for hospice services for another resident diagnosed with Wernicke's encephalopathy. Although the resident had been receiving hospice care since early February, there was no physician order or documentation of the hospice admission date or diagnosis in the resident's records. The Director of Nurses acknowledged the absence of the required physician order for hospice care.
Failure to Address Severe Weight Loss in Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify and address severe weight loss in a timely manner for three residents, leading to deficiencies in nutritional care. Resident #36 experienced an 8.08% weight loss in one month and an overall 11.7% weight loss over six months. Despite being placed on weekly weight monitoring, this was not consistently performed. The Registered Dietitian (RD) acknowledged the significant weight loss but indicated that weekly weights might have been discontinued prematurely. Resident #13 experienced a 6.6% weight loss in one month and a 12.23% weight loss over five months. The RD's assessment was delayed by 16 days after the resident's readmission, partly due to the resident's hospitalization. The RD noted the resident's meal intake was 75% and recommended nutritional supplements, but the delay in assessment contributed to the deficiency. Resident #9 had a severe 12.8% weight loss in one month, with inconsistencies in receiving prescribed nutritional supplements. Observations showed the resident did not consistently receive Nepro supplements as ordered, and weights were not taken as required after readmission. The RD acknowledged the delay in addressing the weight loss and the lack of consistent weight monitoring, contributing to the deficiency in nutritional care.
Failure to Follow Tube Feeding Orders and Weight Policy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to physician's orders for tube feeding and its own policy regarding resident weights, resulting in weight loss for a resident with a feeding tube. The resident, who was readmitted with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes and severe cognitive impairment, had specific orders for Glucerna 1.5 tube feeding at 60 ml per hour for 20 hours daily. However, observations revealed inconsistencies in the administration of the tube feeding, with significant periods where the feeding was not running as ordered. This inconsistency in feeding led to the resident receiving only 18 hours of feeding per day, providing insufficient caloric intake compared to the resident's estimated needs. Additionally, the facility did not follow its policy for weighing residents, as no new readmission weight was recorded for the resident. The Registered Dietitian and Restorative Certified Nursing Assistants were responsible for managing and recording weights, but there was a lack of coordination and communication regarding the weekly and admission weights. This oversight contributed to the resident's weight loss, as evidenced by a recorded weight drop from 184.2 pounds to 176 pounds within a month, indicating a 4.45% weight loss.
Failure to Adhere to Fluid Restriction Orders for Dialysis Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to the physician's fluid restriction orders for a resident undergoing dialysis, leading to a deficiency in care. The resident, who has diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes, Severe Chronic Kidney Disease, and Anemia, was prescribed a fluid restriction of 1000 milliliters per day, with specific allocations for dietary and nursing. However, observations revealed that the resident was provided with 16 ounces of coffee during breakfast on two separate occasions, exceeding the prescribed 6 ounces. This discrepancy was noted despite the meal ticket clearly indicating the fluid restriction and specific fluid amounts allowed. Interviews with the resident and the kitchen manager highlighted a lack of compliance with the fluid restriction orders. The resident, who is cognitively intact, mentioned being aware of her fluid restrictions but believed she was allowed more than prescribed. The kitchen manager admitted to providing two cups of coffee to honor the resident's preferences, despite the meal ticket instructions. The care plan indicated that the resident was non-compliant with dietary restrictions and had been educated on the importance of adhering to fluid restrictions, yet the facility failed to ensure compliance, resulting in the deficiency.
Staffing Deficiencies Lead to Delayed Care and Resident Discomfort
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of several residents, resulting in multiple deficiencies. Resident #2, who was diagnosed with cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type 2, and other conditions, required two-person assistance for repositioning due to left-sided paralysis and severe arthritis. However, the resident reported that a CNA attempted to turn her without assistance, causing pain and fear of falling. The CNA admitted to not seeking help due to a lack of available staff, despite the resident's care plan indicating the need for two-person assistance. Resident #52 experienced delays in receiving meals, as staff prioritized delivering trays to residents who did not require assistance. This resident, who had type 2 diabetes and other health issues, expressed frustration and hunger while waiting for assistance with his meal. The CNA responsible for delivering the tray confirmed that she left Resident #52's meal for last because he needed help eating, highlighting a staffing issue that affected timely care. Additionally, Resident #36 reported waiting several hours for incontinent care, indicating a shortage of staff to meet residents' needs promptly. This resident, who had pneumonia and hypothyroidism, experienced delays in receiving necessary care, further demonstrating the facility's failure to provide adequate staffing. These deficiencies collectively affected the quality of care for the residents and highlighted the need for improved staffing levels to meet their needs effectively.
Failure to Follow Menu Portion Sizes for Regular Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its own menu portions for residents on a Regular diet, potentially affecting 39 out of 75 residents. The facility's menu for lunch on Day 4 of Week 1 specified a portion of 2 ounces of roast pork for a Regular diet. However, during an observation of the lunch tray line, it was noted that the portions served were less than the required amount. Specifically, the first slice of pork weighed 1 ounce, and the second slice weighed 1.5 ounces, both falling short of the 2-ounce requirement. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the portion size for the pork should be 2 ounces, and the Account Manager acknowledged weighing the pork slices to ensure compliance, yet the deficiency was observed.
Failure to Provide Meals According to Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide meals that met the preferences and dietary requirements of two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident #78, who has a severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the lower respiratory tract, was observed to have missing items on their meal tray, including margarine, syrup, and gravy, which were listed on their meal ticket. This oversight occurred despite the presence of a system where two staff members are responsible for checking meal tickets and trays. Similarly, Resident #77, who has mild cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of benign intracranial hypertension and diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, received a meal tray that was missing one slice of bacon, contrary to the meal ticket specifications. The kitchen manager acknowledged the errors in both cases, indicating a lapse in the facility's meal preparation and delivery process, which failed to ensure that residents received meals according to their documented preferences and dietary needs.
Failure to Conduct Quarterly QAPI Meetings with Required Members
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were conducted quarterly and that the necessary staff members attended those meetings for three of the six months reviewed. The facility's policy, dated November 30, 2014, required that Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) meetings be held at least quarterly, with members including the Executive Director, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and Infection Preventionist. However, records revealed that the last QAPI meeting was held on December 18, 2024, and there was no evidence of a meeting in March 2025 or a sign-in sheet with all necessary staff members. During an interview on April 3, 2025, the facility's Administrator, who started in March of that year, stated that a QAPI meeting was held on March 20, 2025, with attendees including the Director of Nursing, Activities, Maintenance, Rehab, Social Services, Admission, and Housekeeping, but not the Medical Director. The Administrator was unable to provide a sign-in sheet from all the necessary members for the QAPI meeting held on March 20, 2025.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE Usage and Precaution Adherence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to infection control guidelines, resulting in multiple deficiencies related to the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and adherence to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Specifically, staff did not wear disposable gowns during personal care and wound care for a resident with a pressure ulcer, nor during medication administration for a resident on EBP. Additionally, PPE was not readily accessible for residents on EBP, and contact precautions were not followed per physician orders for another resident. One resident, who was cognitively intact, had a physician order for contact precautions due to an ESBL-positive urine culture. However, the facility did not conduct a repeat urine culture, and the contact precaution order was not discontinued. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight. Another resident with a PEG tube did not have a gown worn by the staff during medication administration, despite the high-contact nature of the activity. The staff member was unaware of the requirement to wear a gown and noted that gowns were not readily available on the floor. Furthermore, a resident with a stage four pressure ulcer did not have an EBP sign, and staff did not wear gowns during personal and wound care. The Wound Care Nurse and a CNA both failed to wear gowns during high-contact activities, citing a lack of instruction or signage indicating the need for such precautions. The facility's failure to provide accessible PPE and ensure staff compliance with infection control protocols posed a risk to residents on EBP and contact precautions.
Infection Control Deficiency: Uncapped Midline Catheters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet infection control standards of practice related to the use of midline catheters for two residents. Resident #2, who was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with activities of daily living, had an order for a midline catheter to be flushed with saline every shift. During an observation, it was noted that Resident #2's midline catheter IV line was without a cap, leaving it open to the bloodstream. Staff A, an LPN, confirmed that the catheter should have had a cap, and Resident #2 was unaware of the need for a cap. Similarly, Resident #3, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on assistance for activities of daily living, also had an order for a midline catheter to be flushed with saline every shift. An observation revealed that Resident #3's midline catheter IV line was also without a cap. Staff A acknowledged that the line should have been capped. The Director of Nursing confirmed that midline catheter IV lines should have caps, indicating a lapse in infection control practices.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 308 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Pompano Beach
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childrens Comprehensive Care Center Inc | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| John Knox Village Of Pompano Beach | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Deerfield Beach Health And Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Pompano Health And Rehabilitation Center | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 23 | 0 |
| Savoy At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And Nursin | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Aviata At The Sea - Pompano Beach.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.