Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Aviata At Orange Park during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Food service sanitation standards were not followed when surveyors observed cracked plates, cracked bowls, and meal trays with rusted, cracked edges on the tray line and dish rack, along with food debris on and around the meat slicer blade and inside one of the nourishment room microwaves. Staff interviews showed conflicting responsibility for cleaning the meat slicer and microwaves, and the FSD was unsure who cleaned the nourishment room microwaves.
Meal tickets and tray line observations showed that ordered protein portions were not consistently served as prescribed for five residents. Residents with orders for double protein, large protein, or regular diets had meal tickets that did not match their nutritional assessments, and staff gave differing explanations of regular, large, and double protein portions. The facility policy stated diets must be prepared according to the approved Diet Manual and individualized plan of care.
The facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from all forms of abuse and neglect, including physical, mental, and sexual abuse, as well as physical punishment, due to insufficient protective measures and oversight.
Food Service Equipment and Dinnerware Not Kept Clean
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow proper food safety sanitation standards and food handling practices during kitchen and nourishment room observations. On 11/19/2025 at 11:00 AM, surveyors observed cracked plates, cracked bowls, and meal trays with rusted, cracked edges on the tray line and dish rack across from the reach-in refrigerator. The meat slicer on the bottom shelf of the prep table was observed with food debris on and around the blade, and one of two microwaves in the 300-600 unit nourishment room was observed with food debris stuck on and around the inside of the microwave. During interviews on 11/20/2025, staff gave differing accounts of who was responsible for cleaning the meat slicer and the microwaves in the nourishment rooms. One Dietary Aide reported that all kitchen staff were responsible for cleaning kitchen equipment after each use and that Dietary Aides were responsible for washing dishes and watching for broken and rusted dinnerware and utensils, while the Dietary Manager was responsible for cleaning the microwave ovens in the nourishment rooms. Another Dietary Aide reported that cooks were responsible for cleaning the meat slicer after each use and stated Dietary was not responsible for cleaning the nourishment room microwaves. The Food Service Director reported that Dietary Aides were responsible for running the dish machine and reporting concerns with dinnerware and utensils, cooks were responsible for cleaning equipment such as the meat slicer after each use, and was unsure who was responsible for cleaning the microwaves in the nourishment rooms.
Meal Portions Did Not Match Ordered Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure food was served as ordered by the physician and in sufficient quantities to meet residents’ needs for five residents whose meal tickets did not match their diet orders. During a kitchen tour and tray line observation, meal tickets showed different protein orders, including regular large protein 3 oz, large protein 4 oz, regular 3 oz, and Resident #62’s order for regular, double protein TID, 3 oz. The observation found no difference in the amount of protein provided for the regular, large protein, double protein, and regular protein plates. Record review showed Resident #62 was ordered a regular diet with regular texture, thin liquids, and double protein portions for all meals; Resident #136 was ordered large protein portions at all meals to promote wound healing; Resident #103 was ordered a consistent carbohydrate diet with large protein portions at all meals; Resident #73 was ordered a regular NAS diet with large protein portions TID; and Resident #67 was ordered a regular diet with a HS snack. The meal tickets for these residents documented orders that did not match the nutritional assessments, and the RD and Food Service Director gave differing explanations of regular, large, and double protein portions. The facility policy stated diets are to be prepared in accordance with the approved Diet Manual and individualized plan of care.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse and Neglect
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the facility's failure to protect each resident from all types of abuse, including physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by any individual. The report documents that residents were not adequately safeguarded from these forms of mistreatment, indicating lapses in the facility's protective measures and oversight. Specific details about the actions or inactions leading to the deficiency, as well as information about the residents involved or their conditions at the time, are not provided in the report.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 256 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Orange Park
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak View Health And Rehabilitation Center | 0.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Moosehaven | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Orange Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Life Care Center Of Orange Park | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Life Care Center At Wells Crossing | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Aviata At Orange Park.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.