Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Springs At St. Andrews Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide timely, effective pain management for two residents. One resident admitted with severe spinal pain did not receive ordered oxycodone until 21 hours after admission because the prescription was not sent to the pharmacy timely, and pain reassessments and follow-up actions were incomplete when pain remained high. Another resident admitted after femur fracture surgery did not receive PRN oxycodone in a timely manner after reporting pain, and ordered Tylenol and non-pharmacological interventions were not documented as administered or assessed effectively.
Improper medication and supply storage was found in medication carts and a medication storage room. Surveyors observed an opened but undated bottle of Thera Tears, loose single-dose medications and injectable vials in cart drawers, an opened Hydrofera Blue dressing package, unlabeled medication cups with unknown tablets, and multiple expired blood collection tubes, syringes, and needles. Staff, including the DON, IP, clinical resource nurse, NHA, and an LPN, acknowledged the items had been missed during recent reviews.
Failure to Provide Bathroom Privacy and Dignity: Three residents were found without adequate bathroom privacy. One resident had no curtain or bathroom door in her bathroom, while two roommates shared a bathroom with a sliding door that would not close all the way and left them exposed while toileting. Staff gave inconsistent accounts about curtain handling, and the MTD said the curtain for one resident had not been replaced because no clean curtain fit.
A resident with urinary retention had PVR monitoring ordered every 6 hours after Foley removal, but the MAR showed inconsistent checks, missing documentation, and no monitoring on one day. Another resident had a dressing on the forearm without a physician order in place at the time it was observed. A third resident with toe abrasions and a heel pressure injury did not receive ordered wound care consistently, and observations showed heels resting on a pillow instead of being floated and moon boots not being worn in bed.
Medication administration errors exceeded the allowed rate, with four errors in 30 opportunities. An LPN gave a resident the wrong Guaifenesin dose, failed to ensure the resident rinsed after using Trelegy Ellipta, allowed the resident to receive too much Fluticasone nasal spray, and measured psyllium powder with an inaccurate spoon instead of a proper measuring device. The resident did not receive the ordered Guaifenesin because the correct dose could not be located.
Medication administration errors involved one resident who did not receive scheduled IV antibiotics on time after transfer, with missed and delayed doses of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam and no documentation that the pharmacy or ID team was notified. Two other residents had BP meds given or held outside ordered parameters, including metoprolol, lisinopril, amlodipine, isosorbide dinitrate, and sotalol, with inconsistent CPOs/MAR documentation and no documented provider contact for low BP or a missing dose.
Unrepaired closet door damage was found in three resident rooms, with loose or detached hinges and damaged wood around the frames. An MTD said he had not received work orders for the repairs, and a resident reported the problem had been present since admission despite complaints to staff. Staff said CNAs and nurses were expected to submit repair requests through an electronic system, but training on that process was limited.
Laundry Equipment Leak and Unsafe Floor Conditions: Surveyors observed water behind washing machines, detached floor tiles, and a leaking supply hose in the laundry room. The laundry aide said the leak had been ongoing for months and that blankets were placed around one machine each morning to keep water from spreading, while the MTD said he knew about the issue, was responsible for basic inspections, and had not repaired the hose before the survey.
A resident shower room had loose tiles held with duct tape, warping, peeling paint, soft wood, and a shower head that continuously leaked onto the floor. The corridor outside the shower room had damp, discolored carpet and baseboard, one resident room had a dripping sink faucet, and two resident bathrooms had water-damaged, peeling walls and ceilings. The MTD said he had been working on the shower room without documentation, was not initially aware of the leak, and had not received reports about the other damaged areas.
A facility failed to ensure adequate ventilation in three resident personal bathrooms because the exhaust fans were not operating properly. During observation, no air flow was detected at the vents in three bathrooms, and tissue paper placed at the vents was not pulled in. The MTD stated he was not aware of the decreased air flow and could not explain the cause; a later work history report showed an exhaust fan inspection had been completed but did not identify which bathroom fans were checked.
The facility failed to ensure that 23 out of 24 CNAs completed the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. The HRD admitted a lack of communication and tracking, while the DON and ED acknowledged the need for a monitoring system, which was initiated during the survey.
A resident with multiple diagnoses did not receive medications within the prescribed time frame on multiple occasions. The medications involved were administered late, and there were no progress notes documenting the reasons for these delays. Staff interviews revealed that emergencies with other residents sometimes caused the delays, and the importance of timely medication administration was emphasized.
The facility failed to conduct yearly CNA performance reviews and provide training based on the outcome for three CNAs. The previous administration did not prioritize these reviews, but the new team has made it a priority. The DON completed the evaluations during the survey.
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications and biologicals in two medication storage rooms and one medication cart. Expired medications were found with current ones, medications were stored at incorrect temperatures, and a dormitory-style refrigerator was used improperly. Additionally, used medication vials were found in the medication cart without proper labeling.
The facility failed to maintain an infection control program, as observed in one unit where a housekeeper did not allow cleaning solutions to remain wet for the required dwell time, failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene, and used the same mop pad for both the bathroom and resident's room. Staff interviews revealed a lack of knowledge and training regarding proper infection control procedures.
Delayed Pain Medication and Incomplete Pain Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide effective pain management for two residents who required pain services. For one resident, admitted after hospitalization for sepsis and a vertebral infection with severe spinal pain, the facility did not ensure the resident’s oxycodone prescription was sent to the pharmacy in a timely manner. The resident reported pain on admission and stated no pain medication had been received after leaving the hospital. The record showed the first dose of oxycodone was not administered until 21 hours after admission, and the resident experienced ongoing back and neck pain during the stay. The resident’s records also showed gaps in pain reassessment and response to uncontrolled pain. Pain scores remained elevated after oxycodone administration, including documented pain of 7 out of 10 after a dose had been given, with no documentation of additional medication or physician notification about the medication’s ineffectiveness. Follow-up pain assessments were also delayed after medication administration, including one reassessment about five hours after a dose and another almost four hours after a dose. Staff interviews indicated the admission nurse did not enter all hospital orders timely and that the narcotic prescription was not sent to the pharmacy until late that night, with the physician stating no call had been received to address the delay. A second resident, admitted after surgery for a left femur fracture, also did not receive pain medication in a timely manner and per physician orders. The resident reported pain shortly after arrival, and the admission pain assessment documented pain at 7 out of 10. Although PRN oxycodone and Tylenol were ordered, the first oxycodone dose was not administered until nearly two and a half hours after admission and more than an hour after the PRN orders were written. The record did not show any administered doses of PRN Tylenol, and the ordered non-pharmacological interventions were documented as completed without specific interventions or effectiveness being recorded.
Improper Medication and Supply Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications and medical supplies in one medication storage room and two medication storage carts. During observation of the 2 East medication storage cart with an LPN, surveyors found an opened bottle of Thera Tears eye drops that was not dated, a vial of thiamine injectable lying loose in the drawer, a single-dose potassium chloride tablet lying loose in the drawer, a single-use cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion dose lying loose in the drawer, a single-use ipratropium bromide/albuterol sulfate dose lying loose in the drawer, and a Hydrofera Blue wound dressing package that had been opened, cut in half, and left in the bottom drawer. An unknown yellow tablet was also found in a medication cup in the top drawer without a resident name, and the LPN did not know what the tablet was or why it was in the cart. On another medication storage cart, surveyors found two medication cups stacked in the top drawer with unknown tablets inside, and the cups were not labeled with resident identifying information. The LPN stated the resident for whom the medications were intended was eating and she would go give the medications to the resident. In the 1 [NAME] medication storage room, surveyors found expired blood collection tubes, an expired syringe with a needle attached, and expired safety glide needles. The room also contained multiple blood collection tubes that had passed their expiration dates. Facility staff, including the DON, IP, clinical resource nurse, and NHA, stated management had recently reviewed the medication storage rooms and carts but missed the items identified by surveyors. The NHA said the pharmacist had been in the facility the prior week and reviewed the medication storage carts. Clinical resource nurse #2 stated night shift nurses were responsible for removing expired medications and medical supplies from the medication storage rooms and carts, and said the facility's process for ensuring expired items were removed would be addressed.
Failure to Provide Bathroom Privacy and Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were provided privacy and dignity in their personal bathrooms for three residents. Resident #19, who had stroke, unspecified dementia, anemia, and hypertension and was cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 8, was observed in a room where the bathroom had a track for a sliding curtain but no curtain and no bathroom door. The resident stated she could not get to her room door and then to the bathroom before having an incontinence episode, so she went straight to the bathroom and hoped no one came into the room. Resident #74, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and required setup assistance for transferring and toileting, shared a room with Resident #75. Her bathroom had a sliding door that would not close all the way and remained askew during repeated observations. She stated the door had been broken since admission and that it was embarrassing when she tried to use the toilet and could not close the door all the way. Resident #75, who was alert and oriented times four and required one-person assistance with ADLs and transfers, also shared the same bathroom. The bathroom door would not close beyond halfway, and when she used the toilet she was visible to anyone in the room. She stated the door had been broken since admission, was always askew, and that not being able to close it while using the toilet had been horrible. Staff interviews showed inconsistent handling of privacy curtains and awareness of the broken bathroom door, and the maintenance director said the curtain for Resident #19 had not been replaced because there were no clean curtains that fit.
Missed PVR Monitoring, Unordered Dressing, and Incomplete Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders for post-void residual (PVR) monitoring for a resident with cognitive impairment, acute kidney failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and a recent Foley catheter removal. The resident’s orders required PVR checks every six hours after catheter removal, with notification to the physician if the PVR exceeded 300 ml. Record review showed PVRs were documented inconsistently, with measurements recorded twice daily instead of every six hours, one PVR entry lacking a documented volume, and no PVR measurements documented on one day despite the active order. The physician later documented that he had not seen documentation of the resident’s PVR amounts and had to speak with nursing staff about the monitoring. The facility also failed to have physician orders in place for a dressing observed on another resident’s right forearm. The resident had significant cognitive impairment and no documented skin issues on the MDS, yet staff observed a dressing on the forearm on multiple occasions. Nursing and wound care staff reviewed the record and found no existing wound care order for the dressing at the time it was being used. The area under the bandage was later described as a patch of dry skin or an irritated area resembling a psoriasis plaque, and staff stated they did not know who had applied the dressing or when it had first been placed. The facility further failed to provide wound prevention care for a resident with multiple toe abrasions and a right heel pressure injury. The resident’s orders required heel floating, moon boots in bed as tolerated, and daily wound care to the toes and heel. Observations showed the resident’s heels resting directly on a pillow rather than being floated, and the resident was not wearing moon boots in bed. Record review showed missed or undocumented wound care on one day for the toe wounds, and the EMR did not document refusals for moon boots or heel floating. Staff interviews indicated they believed the resident wore boots or had heels floated in bed, but observations did not match those statements.
Medication Administration Errors Exceeded Allowed Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the medication error rate remained below 5 percent and was found to have a 13.33% error rate, with four errors out of 30 opportunities for error. During observation, an LPN administered 600 mg of Guaifenesin to a resident whose MAR ordered 400 mg every morning. After the discrepancy was identified, the tablet was discarded, and the resident did not receive the ordered Guaifenesin because the correct dose could not be located in the facility. The same resident was also observed receiving Trelegy Ellipta and Fluticasone nasal spray in a manner that did not match the MAR instructions. The resident used the Trelegy Ellipta inhaler without being instructed to rinse his mouth afterward, although the MAR required rinsing after use. The resident also self-administered Fluticasone nasal spray at two sprays per nostril, while the MAR ordered one spray per nostril. In addition, the LPN prepared psyllium powder using a white plastic spoon instead of an accurate measuring device, despite acknowledging the need for proper measuring equipment when administering powder medications. The DON and NHA stated that when a medication was unavailable, staff should check the stat safe, contact pharmacy or nursing management, and notify the physician if medications were missed or unavailable.
Medication Administration Errors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #74 received scheduled IV antibiotics as ordered. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including sepsis and infection of the cervical spine/disc area and was ordered IV piperacillin-tazobactam every 8 hours and IV vancomycin every 12 hours. The hospital MAR showed the resident’s last vancomycin dose was given at 11:26 p.m. on 3/21/26 and the next dose due at 11:00 a.m. on 3/22/26 was missed during transfer. The last piperacillin dose was given at 8:41 a.m. on 3/22/26 and the next dose due at 4:00 p.m. was also missed. The facility record showed the antibiotics were delivered later that evening, but neither medication was administered at that time. The resident and the resident’s representative stated no antibiotics had been given since admission to the facility. The MAR showed additional delays after admission, including a 25-hour gap between piperacillin doses and a 37-hour gap between vancomycin doses. A nursing note documented that the 8:00 a.m. vancomycin dose was rescheduled because of a slow drip rate in the IV/PICC line. The record also showed no documentation that the pharmacy was contacted as ordered for vancomycin management and no documentation that the infectious disease team was notified of the missed or delayed doses. The facility also failed to ensure blood pressure medications were administered or held according to ordered parameters for two residents. Resident #43 had orders for lisinopril and metoprolol with varying hold parameters documented in progress notes and medication reconciliation notes, but the CPOs did not consistently reflect those parameters. The MAR showed metoprolol and lisinopril were administered on multiple occasions when systolic blood pressure was below the documented hold threshold, and on other occasions medications were held when the blood pressure was above the ordered hold threshold. Resident #55 had orders for amlodipine, isosorbide dinitrate, and sotalol, including isosorbide with a hold parameter for SBP less than 110 mmHg. The MAR showed antihypertensive medications were given when the resident’s SBP was below that threshold, and one scheduled dose of sotalol was not administered because the medication was unavailable, with no documentation that the physician or pharmacy was contacted regarding the missing medication.
Unrepaired Closet Door Damage in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three residents because damaged closet doors in Resident #8, Resident #33, and Resident #74's rooms were not repaired. On observation, Resident #8's closet door hinge was loose, coming out of the door, with damaged wood around it; Resident #33's closet door hinge was detached from the frame; and Resident #74's closet door hinge was loose, coming out of the door, with damaged wood around it. These conditions were observed again with the maintenance director, who stated he was not aware of the damaged closet doors and had not received a work order to repair them. He said the facility's process for needed repairs was an electronic work order submitted so he could fix items inside residents' rooms. Resident #74 stated the closet door hinge had been loose and coming out of the door since admission and that she had complained to staff, who told her maintenance would repair it, but no one from maintenance had come to see her about it. Staff interviews showed CNAs and nurses were expected to submit repair requests through the electronic system for broken items in residents' rooms, including closet doors. The maintenance director later stated he had submitted a ticket to the electronic work order help desk to open access for all staff to submit work orders, and the facility provided an in-service sheet showing limited staff education on the electronic work order system, with no documentation of a plan to ensure all staff were trained and understood the system.
Laundry Equipment Leak and Unsafe Floor Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure mechanical equipment was in safe, operational condition in the laundry room. Survey observations found four detached floor tiles with water underneath them behind washing machine #1, with a portable blower positioned behind the machine and aimed at the damaged area. Behind washing machine #3, surveyors observed a puddle of water underneath a supply hose, with rolled up blankets placed to the side and in front of the machine and water observed beneath the blankets. Staff interviews showed the leak had been present for an extended period. The laundry aide said the leak behind the washing machines had been ongoing for the entire seven months she had worked there and that the MTD was aware of it. She also said she placed blankets around washing machine #3 each morning to keep water from coming onto the floor. The laundry chemical supply provider representative said he repaired the supply hose on washing machine #3 during the survey by replacing a washer, but stated his company was not responsible for mechanical repairs to the washing machines. The MTD said he was responsible for basic inspections of the washers and dryers, knew the supply hose maintenance was a facility responsibility, and could not explain why he had not repaired it before the survey. He also said the detached tiles had been present since the facility’s acquisition by another corporation and acknowledged that using blankets to address the leak was not appropriate.
Unsafe and Water-Damaged Resident Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, functional, and comfortable environment in multiple areas, including a resident shower room, a corridor outside that shower room, a resident room sink faucet, and two resident personal bathrooms. Survey observations found that one shower room had four 12-by-12 inch wall tiles on the lowest part of the shower wall held in place with strips of duct tape, with a visible gap and black substance beneath one tile, bowing when pressure was applied, warping and peeling paint around the wall and door frame, and soft, disintegrated wood at the bottom of the door frame. The same shower room also had a shower head that continuously leaked water down the wall and onto the floor, leaving a visible puddle. Record review and staff interviews showed the maintenance director had been notified of the loose tiles weeks earlier and had been working on the shower room in stages while residents continued to use it. He stated he had no documentation of the repairs and was not aware of the shower head leak at first, later stating he had replaced the shower head but had no documentation of the purchase, installation, or work order. He also acknowledged that the leak and daily use of the shower room could contribute to water damage and that he should have closed the shower room sooner. The nursing home administrator later stated the shower room would be closed until the interior and exterior water damage were addressed. Surveyors also observed water damage in the corridor outside the shower room, where the carpet and baseboard were discolored, soft, and damp. The maintenance director initially said he was not aware of the damage, then later said he had used carpet fans to dry the area and was waiting to finish the shower room repairs before repairing the corridor. In addition, one resident room had a dripping bathroom sink faucet, and two resident personal bathrooms had water-damaged walls and ceilings with peeled, missing, bubbled, and discolored paint. The maintenance director said he had not been aware of the faucet drip or the bathroom wall damage and stated that housekeepers had not reported the issues to him. He also identified the bathroom damage as water damage and linked it to a previously leaking toilet on the second floor.
Bathroom Ventilation Fans Not Operational
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate outside ventilation by window or mechanical ventilation for three of 12 residents’ personal bathrooms because the ventilation fans were not kept operational. During observation, three resident personal bathrooms were found to have no air flow present at the bathroom vents. The bathrooms were in room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]. During interview and observation with the maintenance director, tissue paper placed at the vents in the three bathrooms was not pulled into the vents, indicating decreased or absent air flow. In one bathroom, the maintenance director removed the vent cover and had to place his hand up to the wrist into the vent opening to detect any air flow. He stated he was not aware of the decreased air flow and could not explain the reason for it. A work history report later provided showed an inspection of exhaust fans had been completed, but it did not identify which specific resident personal bathroom exhaust fans were inspected.
Failure to Ensure CNAs Completed Required Annual Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that certified nurse aides (CNAs) received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training to maintain their competence. Specifically, 23 out of 24 CNAs did not complete the mandated training. The facility's In-Service Training policy, revised in August 2022, aimed to ensure staff could enhance residents' quality of life and care. However, a review of training records revealed non-compliance. Interviews with the human resources director (HRD), director of nursing (DON), and executive director (ED) confirmed the deficiency. The HRD admitted a lack of communication regarding the training requirement and the absence of a staff development coordinator. The DON and ED acknowledged the need for a tracking system to monitor training completion, which was initiated during the survey.
Failure to Administer Medications Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner per physician orders for one resident. Specifically, the resident, who had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation, did not receive their medications within the prescribed time frame on multiple occasions. The medications involved included Metoprolol succinate, Trazadone, Genteal ophthalmic gel, Finasteride, and Furosemide, all of which were administered late on various dates in March 2024. The delays ranged from 36 minutes to over three hours past the allowed administration time. The resident expressed concern during an interview, stating that the late administration of medications could affect their health. A review of the medication administration record (MAR) confirmed the resident's medications were consistently administered late, and there were no progress notes documenting the reasons for these delays. The facility's policy required medications to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, and any deviations should be documented in the resident's medical record. Interviews with staff, including an LPN and the DON, revealed that medications should be administered within a one-hour window before or after the scheduled time to ensure their effectiveness. The LPN mentioned that emergencies with other residents sometimes caused delays. The DON emphasized the importance of timely medication administration as part of the seven rights of medication administration and noted that it was best practice to document any late administrations, although this was not always done.
Failure to Conduct Annual CNA Performance Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct yearly certified nurse aide (CNA) performance reviews and provide training based on the outcome of the reviews for three out of five CNAs reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not provide annual performance evaluations and reviews for CNA #1, CNA #2, and CNA #3. The facility's policy, revised in September 2020, mandates that job performance evaluations be conducted at least annually, and these evaluations should include remarks, suggestions, and any necessary actions such as further training. However, during the survey process, the facility was unable to provide the required performance evaluations for the mentioned CNAs. Interviews with the human resources director (HRD) and the director of nursing (DON) revealed that the previous administration team did not prioritize performance reviews. The HRD mentioned that the new administration team, which came together in 2023, has made it a priority to complete performance reviews timely. The DON confirmed that performance evaluations should have been completed annually and stated that she completed the evaluations for the three CNAs during the survey. The facility's average census was 35 residents, and they provided care for various common diseases, including psychiatric/mood disorders, circulatory system issues, and infectious diseases.
Improper Storage and Labeling of Medications and Biologicals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly in two of three medication storage rooms and one of three medication carts. Specifically, expired medications were found stored with current medications in the medication storage rooms, and medications were stored at incorrect temperatures in medication storage refrigerators. Additionally, medications were improperly stored in a dormitory-style refrigerator/freezer combination, and used medication vials were found in the medication cart without proper labeling. During an observation of the first floor east wing medication cart, an open and used vial of ceftriaxone 1 gram injection was found without a resident name or date on it. The RN responsible for the cart acknowledged that the vial should have been disposed of after use. In the east wing medication storage room, expired bottles of vitamin D3, Iron, and Senokot were found, and the refrigerator temperature was recorded at 33 degrees Fahrenheit, which is below the recommended range. The refrigerator also had significant ice build-up, and various medications and vaccines were stored in it. In the second floor medication room, a dormitory-style refrigerator with ice build-up was observed storing medications such as Tuberculin and Novolog insulin. The LPN was unaware that medications should not be stored in such refrigerators. The DON confirmed that medications and vaccines should be stored according to manufacturer recommendations and acknowledged the issues with expired medications and improper storage practices. The DON also noted that the empty vial of antibiotics should have been disposed of immediately and that medication carts should be kept clean by the nurses.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Housekeeping Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that resident rooms and bathrooms were cleaned in a sanitary manner, that surface disinfectants were used for the appropriate dwell time, that appropriate hand hygiene was performed by housekeeping staff, and that high-touch surfaces were cleaned daily. These deficiencies were observed in one of the two units surveyed. During observations, a housekeeper was seen cleaning a resident's room and bathroom without allowing the cleaning solution to remain wet on surfaces for the manufacturer-recommended dwell time of 10 minutes. The housekeeper also failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene after cleaning the bathroom and before touching multiple items in the resident's room. Additionally, the housekeeper used the same mop pad to clean both the bathroom and the resident's room, further compromising the sanitary conditions. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of knowledge and training regarding the proper use of cleaning chemicals and infection control procedures. The housekeeper did not know the name of the cleaning solution or its dwell time and was not aware of the need to change gloves and perform hand hygiene between tasks. The human resource director, who was also the housekeeping manager, and the director of nursing, who was the facility's infection preventionist, were both unaware of the cleaning chemicals being used and the proper infection control procedures. The executive director confirmed that the housekeeping staff was using an unapproved chemical and that high-touch areas should be cleaned daily.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 492 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 8 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Aurora
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center Of Aurora | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 0 |
| Advanced Health Care Of Aurora | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Hampden Hills Post Acute | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Garden Terrace Alzheimer's Center Of Excellence | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Beth Israel At Shalom Park | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Springs At St. Andrews Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.