Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Kiowa Hills Rehabilitation And Nursing, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with hemiplegia and other medical conditions did not consistently receive restorative ambulation therapy as recommended by PT. The RNA responsible for providing these services was frequently reassigned to other duties, and the DON was unaware of the required therapy frequency. As a result, the resident received fewer therapy sessions than prescribed, contrary to the PT recommendations.
The facility did not procure food from approved or satisfactory sources and failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food according to professional standards.
Staff did not follow menu extensions or recipes during meal preparation, resulting in residents receiving incorrect portion sizes and food items. A resident on a pureed diet was served items not specified in the menu, and residents on regular diets received only half of the required sandwich portion. The dietary manager admitted to not using recipes and noted a lack of training among dietary aides regarding proper portion sizes.
Surveyors observed that food and drink served to residents were not palatable, attractive, or at a safe and appetizing temperature, resulting in a deficiency.
Two residents with cognitive and physical impairments were subjected to physical abuse by another resident with a history of behavioral disturbances. In both cases, the assailant resident physically grabbed the victims, with staff intervening immediately. The incidents were substantiated through staff and resident interviews and record review, confirming that the facility did not prevent the abuse as required by policy.
A resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living did not receive the necessary care and assistance from staff, resulting in unmet needs.
A deficiency occurred when a resident did not receive treatment and care in accordance with physician orders and their documented preferences and goals, resulting in care that was not individualized as required.
A resident at high risk for falls experienced a fall with a major injury due to the facility's failure to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision. Despite care plan instructions to keep the call light within reach, it was frequently found out of reach, preventing the resident from calling for assistance. Staff failed to update the care plan with new interventions after the fall, and observations showed consistent non-compliance with safety measures.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food preparation and storage areas. Dietary aides did not change gloves between tasks, leading to potential cross-contamination. Food items were found unlabeled, undated, or expired, and cleanliness was not maintained, with debris and pests observed in kitchen areas. Additionally, frozen meats were not thawed safely, as they were not fully submerged under running water.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, with staff not adhering to PPE protocols, failing to offer updated COVID-19 vaccinations, and not following proper hand hygiene during meal delivery. Additionally, wound care practices were inadequate, and glucometers were not disinfected after use, leading to potential cross-contamination.
The facility failed to conduct regular care conferences for three residents, preventing them from participating in their person-centered care plans. Despite the facility's policy requiring resident involvement, there was a lack of documentation and missed meetings over several months. Staff interviews revealed scheduling errors contributed to this deficiency.
The facility failed to maintain a comfortable temperature range in four out of five neighborhoods, with temperatures falling below the required 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents reported feeling cold, and some were visibly shivering. Despite complaints and temporary measures like extra blankets, the heating issues persisted due to incomplete repairs and lack of funding from previous ownership.
The facility failed to administer medications timely for two residents, leading to missed doses of crucial medications for managing conditions like neuropathy and respiratory failure. Additionally, due to a shortage of lancets, staff used insulin syringes for blood glucose testing, causing increased pain for four residents. The DON confirmed the inappropriate practices and lack of documentation regarding missed medication doses.
The facility failed to employ a qualified activities director, resulting in an inadequate activities program that did not meet residents' needs. A resident reported limited and repetitive activities, while the AD lacked necessary qualifications and training. The NHA acknowledged insufficient supervision and communication regarding the activities program.
The facility failed to properly store and label medications, with expired medications found in medication carts and storage rooms, and over-the-counter medications lacking resident labels. Observations revealed expired activon honey, phos-nak supplements, cetirizine, latanaprost, buproprion, amlodipine, and citalapram. Additionally, Genteal tears and saline nasal spray were not labeled with resident names. Interviews indicated a lack of awareness regarding medication disposal and storage protocols.
A resident with no cognitive impairment was denied beverages of choice and appropriate clothing, leading to undignified treatment. Despite no fluid restrictions, staff failed to offer alternatives when the dining room was closed. The resident was observed in a wheelchair wearing only an incontinent brief, and the care plan included inappropriate conditions for receiving beverages. Staff interviews confirmed the need for updated care plans and access to clothing.
A resident with a history of trauma preferred female aides for bathing, but the facility failed to consistently honor this preference. Despite a grievance resolution, the care plan and EMR did not reflect her choice, leading to missed showers and a male aide assisting her on one occasion. Staff interviews revealed a lack of documentation and communication regarding her preferences.
A resident reported missing personal items, including a blanket and socks, to several staff members, but the facility failed to document or follow up on the grievances as required by their policy. Despite the resident's representative informing staff, no grievance form was completed, and the facility did not provide documentation of any investigation or resolution.
A resident in a LTC facility was not provided with meaningful activities or one-to-one staff visits as per their care plan. Despite being cognitively intact and independent, the resident reported limited and repetitive activities, mainly Bingo, and inaccuracies in the activities calendar. The activity director, new to the role and lacking proper training, was unaware of the residents' needs, contributing to the deficiency.
A facility failed to ensure proper hospice service coordination for a resident, lacking a physician's order and updated care plan. The resident, with multiple health issues, reported not seeing a hospice nurse for weeks. The facility did not maintain accessible hospice notes or consistent communication, despite the hospice agency's scheduled visits.
Failure to Provide Consistent Restorative Therapy as Recommended
Penalty
Summary
A resident under the age of 65 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, major depressive disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus did not consistently receive restorative therapy services as recommended by the physical therapy department. The resident was cognitively intact and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living. Physical therapy discharge notes recommended a restorative ambulation program five times per week for six weeks to maintain the resident's current level of function, with an excellent prognosis if staff support was consistent. However, restorative nursing notes showed the resident only received therapy on 13 out of 22 possible occasions during the review period. Interviews with the restorative nursing aide (RNA) and the director of nursing (DON) revealed that the RNA was frequently pulled from providing restorative therapy to assist with other duties, such as accompanying residents to outside appointments and working the floor. The RNA confirmed he was unable to provide restorative services according to the resident's plan, and the DON was unaware of the specific frequency required for the resident's restorative program. Both acknowledged that the resident did not receive restorative services as scheduled, resulting in a failure to follow the physical therapy recommendations.
Failure to Follow Food Procurement and Handling Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to procure food from sources that are approved or considered satisfactory and did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards. This deficiency was identified during the survey process, indicating that the facility did not meet regulatory requirements for food safety and handling. No additional details about specific residents, staff, or events are provided in the report.
Failure to Follow Menu Extensions and Recipes for Resident Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that recipes and menu extensions were followed to meet residents' nutritional needs during meal preparation and service. Observations during a dinner meal revealed that residents on regular diets were served only half of a baked Italian sub sandwich instead of the two halves specified in the menu extensions. Additionally, a resident prescribed a pureed diet was served pureed barley soup and a pureed hamburger patty, rather than the required pureed Italian grinder sub and pureed potato salad. The menu extensions also indicated that a pureed brownie should have been served for dessert, but the resident received a pureed chocolate chip cookie and ice cream instead. Record review confirmed that the menu extensions detailed specific portion sizes and food items for both regular and pureed diets, which were not adhered to during meal service. Staff interviews revealed that the dietary manager did not use or follow recipes, was unable to locate them in the dining manager RD program, and acknowledged that dietary aides were not properly trained on portion sizes. The nursing home administrator confirmed that recipes should be followed and recognized the potential concerns related to not doing so, including issues with allergies, safety, and nutritional values.
Failure to Provide Palatable and Properly Tempered Food and Drink
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink provided to residents was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Surveyors observed that the food and beverages did not meet these standards during their review. The deficiency was identified based on direct observation of the meals served to residents.
Failure to Protect Residents from Physical Abuse by Another Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect two residents from physical abuse by another resident, resulting in substantiated incidents of abuse. In the first incident, a resident with a history of cognitive impairment and behavioral symptoms, including aggression and confusion, entered another resident's room without permission and physically grabbed her by the hair. This event was witnessed by staff, who intervened immediately. The victim, who also had moderate cognitive impairment and required some assistance with activities of daily living, did not recall the incident in detail and reported no injury, but staff and the facility's investigation confirmed the physical contact occurred. In a separate incident the following day, the same resident with behavioral disturbances approached another resident near the nurses' station and grabbed her arm. This incident was directly observed by a CNA, who intervened to separate the residents. The victim in this case had significant physical and cognitive impairments, including hemiplegia and dependence on staff for most activities of daily living. She reported no pain or fear as a result of the incident and continued her routine without issue. Both incidents were substantiated by the facility's internal investigations, which included staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and direct observations. The reports indicated that the assailant resident had a documented history of behavioral symptoms and was known to respond to external stimuli with physical contact. The facility's policies required immediate response and increased supervision in such cases, but the incidents occurred nonetheless, resulting in physical abuse of two residents.
Failure to Assist Residents with Activities of Daily Living
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when care and assistance were not provided to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) for residents who were unable to do so themselves. The report notes that residents requiring help with ADLs did not receive the necessary support from staff, resulting in unmet care needs. No further details about specific residents, their medical history, or the exact circumstances of the deficiency are provided in the report.
Failure to Provide Care According to Orders and Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when treatment and care were not provided in accordance with physician orders, as well as the resident's preferences and goals. The report notes a failure to ensure that care was individualized and aligned with the documented directives and wishes of the resident, as required by regulation.
Failure to Ensure Safe Environment and Supervision Leads to Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision for a resident at high risk for falls, leading to a fall with a major injury. The resident, who had a history of falls and a recent femur fracture, was observed multiple times with the call light out of reach, contrary to the care plan instructions. The care plan required staff to keep the call light within reach and to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, but these interventions were not consistently implemented. Observations during the survey revealed that the resident's call light was frequently placed out of sight and reach, either on the floor or under the pillow, despite staff acknowledging the importance of keeping it accessible. On several occasions, staff members, including CNAs and an RN, failed to ensure the call light was within reach, even after entering the resident's room. This lack of adherence to the care plan contributed to the resident's inability to call for assistance, ultimately resulting in a fall while attempting to walk to the sink. The resident's fall care plan was not updated with new interventions following the fall with a fracture, indicating a failure to reassess and modify the care plan to prevent future incidents. Interviews with staff, including the DON, confirmed that the call light placement was inadequate and that the resident required staff assistance for safe transfers. The facility's policy emphasized the importance of implementing and monitoring interventions to reduce accident risks, but these measures were not effectively carried out for this resident.
Sanitation and Food Safety Deficiencies in Kitchen Operations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was prepared, distributed, and served under sanitary conditions in both the main and satellite kitchens, as well as in one of the nourishment refrigerators. Observations revealed that dietary aides did not change gloves between tasks, leading to potential cross-contamination of ready-to-eat foods. For instance, a dietary aide used the same pair of gloves to handle lettuce, touch faucet heads, and prepare salads, while another aide used the same gloves to handle meal tickets, serving utensils, and cookies. The dietary manager confirmed that gloves should be single-use and changed between tasks, which was not adhered to during the lunch service. The facility also failed to store food items safely and appropriately. During inspections, several food items in the refrigerators were found to be unlabeled, undated, or past their expiration dates, including cottage cheese, hot dogs, and various containers of fruits and meats. Additionally, a container of sugar was found uncovered with debris in it. The dietary manager acknowledged that items should be labeled and dated, and that the nourishment refrigerators were part of the kitchen's responsibility, which was not being properly managed. Furthermore, the facility did not maintain cleanliness in the kitchen and food service areas. Observations noted debris on the deli meat slicer, soiled floors, and missing tiles in the main kitchen, which had been an issue for several months. Ants were also observed in the satellite kitchen, indicating a pest problem. The dietary manager admitted that deep cleaning was only performed once a month and that the staff did not consistently use cleaning checklists. Additionally, frozen meats were not thawed in a safe manner, as they were not fully submerged under running water, and the packaging was not removed, contrary to the facility's policy and professional standards.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE, Vaccination, and Hygiene Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies observed during the survey. Staff did not adhere to the required personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols when entering rooms with transmission-based precautions. Specifically, a certified nurse aide and a registered nurse entered rooms without wearing the necessary eye protection, and the isolation cart outside the room lacked the required supplies. The assistant director of nursing, who also acted as the infection preventionist, acknowledged the oversight and indicated that in-the-moment training was provided to staff. The facility also failed to offer updated COVID-19 vaccinations to residents and did not document consent or declination for the 2024-2025 season. The electronic medical records for several residents did not reflect their current vaccination status, and the assistant director of nursing admitted to not having offered the vaccines. The regional clinical resource confirmed that the vaccines were available but had not been administered, and the immunization records were not up to date. Additionally, staff did not follow proper hand hygiene practices during meal delivery, as observed with two certified nurse aides who failed to perform hand hygiene between delivering meal trays to residents. Furthermore, during wound care for a resident, a registered nurse did not change gloves between treating different wound sites, nor did she use a clean barrier under the resident, leading to potential cross-contamination. Lastly, glucometers were not disinfected after each use, as observed with a registered nurse who failed to clean the devices before returning them to their cases, despite each resident having their own glucometer. The assistant director of nursing acknowledged these lapses in infection control practices and indicated that staff education was provided regularly.
Failure to Conduct Regular Care Conferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents had the opportunity to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered care plans. This deficiency was identified for three residents out of a sample of 33. The facility's policy requires that residents and their representatives be invited to care conferences to discuss and review care plans. However, the facility did not conduct regular care conferences for the involved residents, nor did they maintain adequate documentation of such meetings. Resident #5, who has multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and diabetes, was not documented to have attended a care conference between July 2024 and January 2025. Although a care conference was held in January 2025, there was no record of any meetings in the interim period. Similarly, Resident #14, who has a history of stroke and diabetes, had no documented care conferences between August 2024 and January 2025. The resident's representative confirmed that they had not been invited to any meetings since the initial one in the summer of 2024. Resident #38, who suffers from dementia and other conditions, also lacked documentation of care conferences since July 2024. The resident's representative stated that they had not been contacted for a meeting in several months. Staff interviews revealed that the social services director was using an incorrect schedule for care conferences, resulting in missed meetings for some residents. The facility's failure to adhere to its policy and maintain proper documentation led to the deficiency in resident participation in care planning.
Facility Fails to Maintain Adequate Heating
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a comfortable air temperature range in four out of five neighborhoods, as required by their Quality of Life-Homelike Environment policy. This policy mandates that temperatures should be maintained between 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. Observations and interviews revealed that the ambient temperatures in various areas of the facility were below the required range, with some areas as low as 62.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents reported feeling cold, and some were visibly shivering, indicating that the environment was not comfortable or homelike. Interviews with residents and their representatives highlighted ongoing issues with the heating system. Several residents reported that their rooms were cold, and some mentioned that the heating had been inadequate for an extended period. Despite complaints to the maintenance supervisor, the issues persisted, and residents were provided with temporary solutions such as extra blankets. The maintenance supervisor acknowledged the problems and stated that the facility had been experiencing heating issues since before September 2024. The facility's maintenance records showed attempts to address the heating problems, including cleaning and flushing supply lines, adjusting sensors, and recommending repairs. However, some recommended repairs, such as thermostat replacement and pipe blockage repair, were not completed. The maintenance supervisor noted that previous facility ownership did not provide funds for necessary repairs, contributing to the ongoing deficiency in maintaining a comfortable environment for residents.
Medication Administration and Blood Glucose Monitoring Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents received medications in a timely manner according to physician's orders, affecting two residents. One resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of cerebral palsy, quadriplegia, and neuropathy, did not receive prescribed doses of gabapentin and baclofen on multiple occasions due to the medications being on order. The facility's staff did not document any contact with the resident's provider regarding the missed doses, and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the absence of such documentation. The DON acknowledged that the medications were crucial for managing the resident's nerve pain and muscle spasms, and that inconsistent administration could reduce their effectiveness. Another resident, who was cognitively intact and had chronic respiratory failure and anxiety disorder, also missed doses of prescribed medications, including buspirone and Advair, due to them being on order. The facility's staff failed to document any communication with the resident's provider about the missed doses. The DON verified the missed doses and expressed confusion over the documentation, as some doses were marked as administered despite the medications being unavailable. The resident's conditions required consistent medication administration to manage anxiety and respiratory issues. Additionally, the facility failed to use appropriate devices for blood glucose monitoring for four residents. Due to a shortage of lancets, the facility resorted to using insulin syringes with needles to obtain blood samples, which was more painful for the residents. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) directed this practice, and the DON confirmed it was inappropriate. Residents reported increased pain from the needle method, and the Medical Director noted that while it caused more discomfort, there were no long-term consequences. The facility's supply management issues led to the use of inappropriate devices for blood glucose testing.
Unqualified Activities Director Leads to Inadequate Resident Engagement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the activities program was directed by a qualified professional, as required by the National Certification Council of Activity Professionals (NCCAP). The activities director (AD) lacked the necessary qualifications and experience for the role, having assumed the position without prior experience or training. The AD was not aware of the certification requirements and had not been provided with a mentor or adequate supervision. The previous AD also lacked certification and experience, having transitioned from the maintenance department to the activities role. A resident expressed dissatisfaction with the limited and repetitive activities available, indicating that the facility's activities program did not meet the residents' needs or interests. The resident reported spending the day with nothing to do, highlighting the inadequacy of the activities provided. The initial activities calendar was heavily reliant on a single activity, coffee and news, which constituted half of the scheduled activities for the month. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of communication and oversight regarding the activities program. The nursing home administrator (NHA) acknowledged that the consultant responsible for supervising the AD was not aware of the new hire and that monthly supervision was insufficient for an inexperienced AD. The AD had not been informed of the role's requirements, and the consultant had not been contacted to provide necessary training and support.
Improper Storage and Labeling of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications and biologicals were properly stored and labeled according to professional standards. During observations, expired medications were found in both the medication carts and the medication storage room. Specifically, seven tubes of activon medical grade honey and a box of phos-nak dietary supplements were found with expiration dates that had already passed. Additionally, a bottle of cetirizine, latanaprost eye drops, buproprion, amlodipine, and citalapram were found with expired dates on the medication cart in the 100 hallway. Furthermore, over-the-counter medications intended for single resident use were not labeled with the resident's name. In the 600 hallway medication cart, a box of Genteal tears and a bottle of saline nasal spray were found without pharmacy labels or resident names. Interviews with RN #1 and the DON revealed a lack of awareness regarding the proper disposal of expired medications and the appropriate duration for using opened medications like latanaprost. The DON acknowledged that the medication carts and storage room should be checked weekly, but was unsure why expired medications were still present.
Resident Denied Dignified Care and Personal Choices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with respect and dignity, as evidenced by the lack of provision of beverages and appropriate clothing upon request. The resident, who was under 65 years old and had a BIMS score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment, was denied a beverage of choice when the dining room was closed, and staff did not offer an alternative. Additionally, the resident was observed sitting in a wheelchair wearing only an incontinent brief and was not provided with clothing despite requesting to get dressed. The resident's medical records indicated no fluid restrictions, contradicting a staff member's claim that the resident was on such a restriction. The resident's care plan included inappropriate conditions for receiving beverages, such as keeping his room clean and using the bathroom appropriately. The facility's failure to update the care plan and provide necessary clothing further contributed to the resident's undignified treatment. Interviews with staff and other residents corroborated the resident's claims of unfair treatment. The Social Services Director acknowledged the need for an updated care plan and the availability of donated clothing, while the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that residents should not be restricted in their choices by a Power of Attorney and should not be required to wear hospital gowns if they wish to dress in regular clothing.
Failure to Honor Resident's Preference for Female Shower Aides
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's preference for assistance with bathing from female shower aides. The resident, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for bathing, expressed a preference for female aides due to a history of trauma and sexual assault. Despite this, the facility did not consistently accommodate her preference, resulting in missed showers when male aides were assigned. The resident's care plan and electronic medical record (EMR) did not reflect her preference for female aides, even though a grievance was filed and resolved with the agreement that only female staff would assist her. The care plan inaccurately stated that the resident had no preference for male or female caregivers, contradicting the resident's expressed wishes and the grievance resolution. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of documentation and communication regarding the resident's preferences. Certified nurse aides (CNAs) and the director of nursing (DON) were unaware of the specific preference for female aides, and the shower book used by staff did not include information on aide preferences. This lack of documentation and communication led to the facility's failure to consistently honor the resident's choice, as evidenced by a male aide assisting the resident with a shower on one occasion.
Failure to Resolve Resident Grievances Promptly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of grievances for a resident who reported missing personal items. The resident, who had no cognitive impairment and required assistance with mobility and personal hygiene, reported a missing blanket and socks to several staff members, including a CNA, a nurse, and the social services director (SSD). Despite these reports, the facility did not document or follow up on the grievances as required by their policy. The policy mandates that grievances be investigated and a report submitted to the administrator within five working days, with findings communicated to the resident. However, no grievance form was completed for the current missing items, and the facility was unable to provide documentation of any investigation or resolution. Interviews with the resident and their representative revealed that the blanket had gone missing before and was found after five weeks, but was missing again. The representative reported the missing items to staff, and the SSD acknowledged being informed about the missing socks only on the day of the survey. The SSD mentioned that the facility would replace the socks if not found, but no grievance form had been completed. The nursing home administrator (NHA) stated that any staff member could report missing items and that a form should be filled out and submitted to the NHA. The facility planned to re-educate staff on the grievance reporting process, but this was not part of the deficiency itself.
Failure to Provide Meaningful Activities for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities tailored to meet the needs and interests of Resident #16, who was one of three residents reviewed for activities. Resident #16, a 77-year-old with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease, dementia, and epilepsy, was cognitively intact and independent in daily activities. The resident expressed a strong interest in keeping up with the news, participating in favorite activities, and going outside for fresh air, but did not prioritize group or religious activities. Despite these preferences, the resident reported a lack of meaningful activities and one-to-one staff visits as outlined in his individualized care plan. Observations and interviews revealed that Resident #16 often sat in his room with no TV, music, or reading materials, and reported that the facility's activities were limited and repetitive, mainly consisting of Bingo. The resident also noted that the activities calendar was often inaccurate, with scheduled activities frequently changed or canceled. Despite having a care plan that included independent leisure pursuits and participation in group activities, there was no documentation of activity participation for December 2024 or January 2025, except for a few Bingo sessions in November 2024. Interviews with the activity director (AD) and other staff highlighted a lack of organization and oversight in the activities program. The AD, who had recently assumed the role without proper training or mentorship, was unaware of the residents' needs and the requirements for an activity director in a nursing facility. The AD admitted to not knowing who created the initial January 2025 activities calendar and had to revise it after discovering inaccuracies. The nursing home administrator acknowledged the AD's lack of training and mentorship, which contributed to the deficiency in meeting Resident #16's activity needs.
Deficiency in Hospice Service Coordination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that hospice services provided to a resident met professional standards and principles. Specifically, the facility did not obtain a physician's order for hospice care for a resident who was receiving hospice services. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that the hospice agency's notes were easily accessible to the facility staff, nor did it maintain consistent communication and documentation of hospice care visits and updates. The resident involved was under 65 years old and had multiple diagnoses, including diabetes, respiratory failure, heart failure, and kidney cancer, among others. The resident was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for daily activities. Despite being enrolled in hospice services, the resident reported not having seen a hospice nurse for four to five weeks, indicating a lapse in the expected frequency of hospice visits. The facility's records did not include a physician's order for hospice care, and the hospice care plan had not been updated since a previous hospice agency managed the resident's care. The new hospice agency had been providing services since November, but there was no active physician's order until the survey. The hospice clinical supervisor confirmed that the resident was scheduled for regular visits, but the facility lacked a communication binder and had issues with receiving documentation from the hospice agency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 97 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Colorado Springs
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear Creek Senior Living | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Brookdale Skyline | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Sundance Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 1 |
| Medallion Post Acute Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Springs Village Care Center | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Kiowa Hills Rehabilitation And Nursing, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.