Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0851
F

Inaccurate PBJ Staffing Hours Reported to CMS

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 02-18-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately report direct care staffing hours to CMS through the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ)/Quality of Care reporting system for specific dates in December 2025 and January 2026. For the 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift in December 2025, the Quality of Care report submitted to CMS showed significantly lower direct care staffing hours than those documented in the facility’s payroll detail report. On 12/20, with a census of 62, 52.32 hours were reported to CMS while payroll showed 91.51 hours; on 12/24, with a census of 63, 37.40 hours were reported while payroll showed 63.27 hours; on 12/27, with a census of 63, 61.18 hours were reported while payroll showed 86.99 hours; and on 12/28, with a census of 61, 61.00 hours were reported while payroll showed 98.69 hours. A similar pattern occurred in January 2026 for the 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift, where the Quality of Care report again reflected inaccurate direct care staffing hours compared to the payroll detail. On 01/03, with a census of 65, 33.75 hours were reported versus 104.74 hours on payroll; on 01/20, with a census of 66, 38.21 hours were reported versus 64.10 hours; on 01/21, with a census of 66, 41.11 hours were reported versus 65.13 hours; on 01/24, with a census of 65, 72.50 hours were reported, which matched the payroll; on 01/27, with a census of 64, 37.83 hours were reported versus 75.80 hours; on 01/28, with a census of 64, 38.44 hours were reported versus 64.92 hours; and on 01/31, with a census of 64, 47.50 hours were reported versus 76.73 hours. During an interview on 02/18/26 at 12:05 p.m., the corporate nursing officer acknowledged that the facility had not accurately submitted staffing information to CMS. At the time, the administrator had identified that 63 residents resided in the facility.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙