Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0726
E

Failure to Follow Physician's Order for Apical Pulse Prior to Heart Medication Administration

Reseda, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A licensed vocational nurse (LVN) failed to follow a physician's order requiring the measurement of a resident's apical pulse prior to administering Flecainide, a heart medication. The resident, who had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and was cognitively intact, had a physician's order specifying that Flecainide should be held if the apical pulse was less than 60 beats per minute. Despite this, the LVN did not take the apical pulse before administering the medication on multiple occasions, as evidenced by the Medication Administration Records (MAR) for March, April, and May, which showed no documentation of the apical pulse being taken prior to administration. During a medication pass observation, the LVN was seen taking only the resident's blood pressure and radial pulse before giving Flecainide, and stated there was no need to check anything else. When questioned, the LVN indicated he was unaware of the order to check the apical pulse and had never done so for this resident before administering the medication. The LVN also stated that the electronic medical record system did not prompt for an apical pulse entry, and believed that the order should have been entered with a parameter requiring this check. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the facility's Pharmacist Consultant both confirmed that the apical pulse should have been checked and documented prior to each administration of Flecainide, as per the physician's order and pharmacy recommendations. The DON verified that the medication was given without the required apical pulse check on multiple occasions. The LVN's competency records indicated training on following medication parameters, but this was not adhered to in practice. The facility's policy required medications to be administered according to physician orders, which was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙