Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at River Oaks Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Meals were not consistently served as ordered or in a palatable manner. During dining observations, several residents reported pork was too tough to chew and that gravy listed on the meal ticket was missing, while others said chicken was bland, tough, and served too often. Residents also reported that food preferences and alternate selections were not reliably updated or honored, and a DMFN confirmed the gravy should have been on the pork per recipe and ticket.
Meals were served in a way that did not match meal tickets or resident preferences. Several residents were given tough pork without the gravy listed on the ticket, and multiple residents described the food as bland or inedible. Other residents reported being repeatedly served chicken despite stating they disliked it, and some said alternate selections were not consistently offered when they refused the meal.
Infection control practices were not maintained when two residents’ wheelchairs were found with cracked pads exposing inner padding, clean linen carts contained mixed and opened supplies instead of only clean linen and Hoyer slings, a wound patch was left on a shower room drain, and a Hoyer sling was found on a shared closet floor. The DON, ICP, RN, and NA confirmed the observations, including that the sling had been left in the closet and that the carts contained items that should not have been stored there.
Dining room disrepair was observed, including peeling paint on the wall, deep gouges in the sheet rock, cracked PTAC units with missing caulking, water damage, and a hole in the lower left door facing. The Dietician acknowledged the issues and reported them to maintenance, and the Administrator later confirmed the facility was aware of the concerns and that repairs had started.
A resident with C. diff had enteric precaution signage posted at the room entrance, but the care plan did not address the infection or isolation needs until several days after admission. The CEO confirmed the C. diff diagnosis and enteric precautions were not captured in the care plan until that later date.
An unlocked medication cart was observed unattended near the nursing station, and the assigned RN confirmed she had given her keys to another nurse. In a resident room, three tubes of Bio-Freeze ointment were found on a resident’s bedside shelf in sight and within reach; the DON confirmed the ointment could not be left in the room.
A survey found that nutritional supplements were not being offered per physician orders. In the nourishment room, surveyors observed unopened frozen nutrient cups that the Unit Mgr said were supposed to have been offered, but were sometimes just put in the freezer when residents refused. Record review showed several residents’ MARs documented 100% consumption for supplements that were dated to be given, and the Unit Mgr confirmed refusals should have been recorded on the MAR.
An LPN administered Lovenox into a resident’s bruised abdominal fold, expelled the air bubble from the prefilled syringe, and used an injection site too close to the umbilicus. The same resident also received an inhaler incorrectly when the LPN gave oral meds with water between puffs and then provided water to swish and spit after the second puff; the DON confirmed the Lovenox was not given correctly and had no response to the inhaler administration issue.
A resident reported missing lunch after returning from therapy, stating his tray was left on his bedside table while his roommate ate both meals and staff did not promptly provide another tray. A CNA said she did not know he needed a tray and later offered a sandwich because dinner was approaching; the sandwich and drinks were delivered later that afternoon.
Unsanitary glove use and food prep surface contamination were observed during meal service. A staff member removed gloves, left the work area to get items, and put on new gloves without witnessed hand washing; the staff member said changing gloves or using alcohol rub was enough. Kitchen observations also found food debris and sticky residue on prep and tray line surfaces, and the same staff member later handled food, discarded gloves, and donned new gloves without washing hands first.
A resident was observed on enteric precautions, but record review showed the diagnosis list did not match the precautions orders. The resident’s hospital discharge summary listed C. diff colitis, yet the diagnosis was not entered into the EHR upon admission and was added later. The Administrator confirmed the c-diff diagnosis was not captured at admission.
Unsafe Condition in Resident Dining Room: A surveyor observed an approximate 3-inch round hole in the lower left doorfacing at the back exit door in the resident dining room, with sheet rock dust and chunks falling onto the floor. The condition was easily accessible to all residents in the dining room, and both a dietician and the facility administrator acknowledged the finding.
Surveyors observed that one of two resident shower rooms on a resident hall had a damaged wall area covered with black tape and stained, discolored tile grout in the shower stall, indicating the environment was not maintained in a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike condition. These environmental concerns were confirmed by the Director of Plant Maintenance and acknowledged by the Administrator.
Surveyors observed Sani wipes left on vending machines in a day room, multiple hazardous items including equipment and a broken picture frame in an open Internet cafe/storage area, and exposed wiring outside a resident room. Staff interviews confirmed these areas were accessible to residents and that hazardous conditions had been present for some time.
Surveyors found open soda cans on a PPE cart, exposed lift pads on a clean linen cart, and unclear PPE/EBP precaution signage that did not specify which resident required precautions. Staff interviews confirmed improper storage practices and confusion about infection control signage.
Staff failed to consistently remove soiled incontinence briefs from resident rooms after care, as reported by two cognitively intact residents and confirmed by multiple staff interviews. The ongoing presence of soiled briefs led to unpleasant odors and indicated a lapse in adherence to facility protocols for maintaining a clean environment.
Surveyors observed that the dumpster area was polluted with garbage and used medical supplies, and this was confirmed by the Administrator. This improper storage of refuse had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
A medication administration error occurred when an RN failed to give prescribed medications to multiple residents over several night shifts, and the facility did not complete required staff re-education or medication cart audits as part of its correction plan. The missed medications included treatments for chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and depression.
The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in a widespread gnat infestation observed in resident rooms and common areas. Staff confirmed the issue, and an exterminator stated he had not been called to address gnats prior to the survey. A resident reported having to kill gnats herself and experienced delayed garbage removal, with no follow-up from administration after reporting her concerns.
Multiple residents experienced undignified dining conditions, including witnessing a cognitively impaired resident play with a soiled brief in the dining room without staff intervention, being served meals late, and being required to eat off serving trays. Additionally, residents reported long wait times for call light responses, with one resident waiting nearly 20 minutes for assistance during an episode of diarrhea. Staff interviews confirmed these practices and delays.
The facility did not document or respond to concerns raised by residents during council meetings, including repeated requests for menu changes. Staff failed to record these grievances in official logs or meeting minutes, and the Administrator was unaware of the ongoing issues, despite residents being cognitively intact and able to recall their requests.
Diagnosis sheets and mini nutritional assessments containing confidential information were left in an unsecured wall file holder outside the medical records office, making them accessible to anyone passing by. The Medical Records Coordinator confirmed that these documents, printed by an MDS RN, were not properly secured and included private resident information.
Several residents were observed to be cold in the dining room, with some wearing extra layers or using blankets. The ambient temperature was measured at 65.5°F, below the required minimum of 71°F. The Maintenance Director confirmed that staff sometimes turn on the air conditioner, leading to the uncomfortable environment.
Multiple cognitively intact residents voiced concerns about menu options, room cleanliness, food quality, and missing personal property, but their verbal grievances were not documented, investigated, or resolved by facility staff. The Administrator and housekeeping staff failed to follow grievance procedures, resulting in unresolved issues and lack of communication with the residents.
Several residents' care plans were not updated to reflect their preferences for showers, history of refusals, or current wound care needs. For example, residents who preferred showers did not have this preference or their refusals documented in their care plans, and residents with pressure ulcers did not have individualized interventions for wound care or turning and repositioning included in their plans, despite staff and DON confirmation of these needs.
Multiple residents did not receive prescribed medications over several night shifts, with staff documenting administration that did not occur. A resident experienced significant unaddressed weight loss without required re-weighs, and another had unclear documentation regarding enteral feeding flushes. These deficiencies reflect failures in medication administration, monitoring, and adherence to physician orders.
Surveyors found that medication and treatment carts were left unlocked and unattended in multiple hallways, with LPNs confirming responsibility for the carts. These actions resulted in accident hazards in areas accessible to residents, as confirmed by facility leadership.
The facility did not provide enough direct care staff on multiple occasions, falling below its own assessed staffing requirements. As a result, dependent residents did not receive showers, one resident was not showered at their preferred time, a resident with a Stage III pressure ulcer was not turned and repositioned, and another experienced significant weight loss without interventions. These deficiencies were confirmed by staffing records and acknowledged by the DON.
Surveyors found that several residents were prescribed medications without appropriate diagnoses or indications, including drugs for dementia, depression, and seizures, as well as an antibiotic to which a resident was allergic. The DON confirmed the lack of supporting documentation or diagnoses, and the consultant pharmacist missed a medication irregularity due to timing of the order.
The facility did not follow planned menus or provide required food items due to frequent shortages, resulting in a resident repeatedly not receiving items such as milk, bread, and specific entrees as listed on meal tickets. Staff confirmed that menu changes were not communicated to residents and that food substitutions were made without notice.
Surveyors found multiple failures in food safety and sanitation, including unlabeled and spoiled food in the refrigerator, open food items in the freezer, dented cans in dry storage, and unclean kitchen equipment and surfaces. The dishwasher was used despite not reaching the required rinse temperature, and ice machine drains lacked the necessary air gap due to broken brackets.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by a resident with cognitive impairment being allowed to play with feces in the dining room without staff intervention, overflowing trash and soiled linen containers left unattended, and wound care provided to a resident under Enhanced Barrier Precautions without proper PPE or signage.
Surveyors observed a black substance and debris around PTAC units in dining rooms and on ceiling vents throughout the facility. The Maintenance Director confirmed these findings, which had the potential to impact all residents, staff, and visitors.
Two residents were transferred to different rooms without receiving the required written notice or explanation prior to the move. The Social Worker confirmed that written notification was not provided before the room changes.
A resident who is cognitively intact and receives dialysis was not provided showers according to her stated preferences, despite communicating her desire for afternoon and Sunday showers to staff. She was instead scheduled for showers during the night shift, leading to multiple refusals due to unsuitable timing. Staff confirmed awareness of her preferences, but no changes were made to accommodate her requests.
A resident's PASARR documentation did not include all pre-admission diagnoses, as the form omitted the resident's Epilepsy diagnosis and only listed major depression. This omission was confirmed by the Director of Social Services during staff interview.
The facility did not consistently follow or update care plans for three residents, including missing behavior monitoring for a resident with behavioral issues, failing to document a history of physical aggression for another, and not providing specific interventions for a resident with legal blindness. These deficiencies were confirmed through record reviews, staff interviews, and direct observation.
Two residents who required assistance with activities of daily living did not receive scheduled showers as ordered, with one resident missing three out of eight showers and another missing six out of eight, resulting in extended periods without proper hygiene. Both residents expressed a preference for showers and there was no documentation of refusals for one resident, while the other had only two refusals documented. The DON confirmed these findings.
A resident with a stage III pressure ulcer, who is immobile and fully dependent on staff, was not consistently turned and repositioned as required by standard nursing practice. Despite having wound care orders, there were no documented interventions for regular turning, and record review showed the resident was repositioned far less frequently than recommended. Staff interviews and documentation confirmed the lack of consistent implementation of this essential preventive measure.
A resident experienced a significant weight loss of 10.3% in one month without any dietary assessment or intervention, despite being on a regular diet and consuming 51-100% of meals. No supplements or additional nutrition were ordered, and the DON confirmed that no dietary assessment was completed after the weight loss was identified.
A resident experienced blood in their catheter bag, which was reported by an LPN to both the NP and MD, but neither responded to the message. The resident was not evaluated by a provider until two days later, when they were found to be acutely hypoxic with Cheyne-Stokes respiration and cyanosis, and subsequently stopped breathing.
Surveyors found that the facility did not ensure physician responses to pharmacist recommendations for two residents, including failure to address duplicate medication orders and lack of rationale for administering a medication to a resident with a documented allergy. No physician acknowledgment or rationale was documented in the medical records.
Two residents refused their breakfast trays, and the CNA removed the meals without offering alternative options. The CNA stated that an alternative was not offered because one resident typically prefers sweets for breakfast. The DON confirmed that staff are trained to offer substitutes if residents are unhappy with the meal served.
Three residents had incomplete or invalid POST forms in their medical records, including missing physician signatures, phone numbers, and license numbers, as well as a lack of required signatures from a legal decision maker despite multiple care conferences. The Director of Social Services confirmed these documentation deficiencies.
Meals Served Without Required Gravy and Resident Preferences Not Reflected
Penalty
Summary
Meals were not prepared and served in a manner that conserved nutritive value, flavor, appearance, and palatable presentation. During the annual survey, multiple residents were observed in the dining room not eating the meal served, and several reported that the pork or chicken was too tough to chew and that the food was bland or unappealing. The survey findings involved residents #61, #72, #33, #81, #28, #11, #66, #15, #80, #87, #94, and #74, with a facility census of 110. At lunch observation, residents #61, #33, #81, and #28 each reported that the pork was too tough and that they could not eat it without gravy. The meal tickets indicated gravy should have been on the pork, but the plates observed had no gravy. Resident #61 specifically stated the ticket showed gravy on the meat but none was present, and Resident #72 also reported the pork was always tough and could not be eaten without gravy. Staff interview with the District Manager for Food and Nutrition confirmed gravy should have been on the pork per recipe and meal ticket. Additional resident interviews showed ongoing dissatisfaction with meal quality and preference handling. Resident #11 reported the pork was too tough and that alternate meals were not always provided when requested. Resident #66 stated the food was not seasoned and that the pork was too tough without gravy. Residents #15, #80, #87, #94, and #74 reported they disliked chicken, said it was served too often, and stated their preferences had not been updated despite telling nursing or kitchen staff. The dietary manager acknowledged that meal preferences were obtained on admission and said she would begin working on updating preferences for the residents discussed.
Meals Served Without Required Gravy and Ignoring Resident Food Preferences
Penalty
Summary
Meals were not prepared and served in a palatable, attractive manner consistent with resident preferences and meal tickets. During the dining room observation, multiple residents were served pork that was reported to be too tough to chew, and several residents stated that gravy was missing from the meat even though the meal ticket indicated gravy should have been provided. The plate observed for one resident showed no gravy on the pork, and the District Manager for Food and Nutrition confirmed that gravy should have been on the pork per the recipe and meal ticket. Several residents also described the food as bland, "slop," or generally bad, and one resident reported that the food had become worse over the prior several months. The report also documented that resident food preferences were not consistently reflected in meal service. Two residents were served cranberry orange chicken and stated they did not like chicken and wished it would stop being sent. Other residents reported that they had told nursing or kitchen staff they were tired of chicken or pork, but continued to receive those items. One resident stated that alternate selections were sometimes provided and sometimes not. The dietary manager reported that preferences were obtained on admission and reviewed during assessments, but residents interviewed stated that no one had recently come to update their preferences.
Infection Control Program Failed to Maintain Sanitary Storage and Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections related to residents’ personal products and unsanitary practices. During a walk-through, Resident #128’s wheelchair was observed in her room with cracks in the front left seat pad and right arm pad exposing the inner padding. Resident #2’s wheelchair was also observed in his room with a crack in the front left hand rest exposing the inner padding. The Director of Nursing, with the Chief Executive Officer present, acknowledged and confirmed that the wheelchairs in Resident #2 and Resident #128’s rooms had exposed padding. Additional observations showed infection control and storage issues in multiple areas of the facility. A clean linen cart on [NAME] Hall contained opened pouches/wipes, trash bags, and an opened bag of briefs mixed with clean linen on the top shelf, and a clean linen cart on [NAME] Fort Hall contained an opened container of Sani-Cloth wipes with one wipe exposed, hydro-shield barrier creme in a plastic bag, two open boxes of plastic gloves, and a loose roll of clear plastic trash bags. The Infection Control Preventionist confirmed these items were on the clean linen cart shelves and stated only clean linen and Hoyer slings were to be stored on the hallway linen carts. A wound patch was later observed left on the drain underneath the shower chair in the Long Hall shower room, and RN #61 confirmed it had been left there after the last resident’s shower. In addition, a Hoyer lift sling was found on the floor in the corner of a shared closet in room [ROOM NUMBER]; RN #32 confirmed it should not have been left there, and NA #101 stated she had left the sling in the closet floor and began to remove it.
Dining Room Disrepair
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the resident dining room due to visible disrepair observed during survey. The right-side wall had peeling paint, there were three deep unrepaired gouges measuring approximately 2 to 2 1/2 inches long in the sheet rock between the floor-to-ceiling windows, the PTAC units were cracked with missing caulking around both units, and there was water damage with loose and peeling paint and an approximately 3-inch round hole in the lower left door facing. During interview, the Dietician acknowledged the peeling paint, sheet rock gouges, cracked and missing caulking, water damage, and hole at the back exit door and stated she would report the issues to maintenance. The Administrator later confirmed he was aware of the issues and that maintenance had started repairs.
Care Plan Not Updated for Enteric Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #78’s care plan was revised to address enteric precautions for a Clostridium difficile infection. During a walk-through, enteric precaution signage was observed on the wall by the resident’s entrance door. Record review showed the resident was admitted on 05/18/26 and the hospital discharge summary documented a diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. The care plan review found the focus, “resident has c-diff and is in enteric isolation,” was not initiated until 05/26/2026. During interview, the CEO confirmed that the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection and enteric precautions were not captured or addressed in the resident’s care plan until 05/26/26.
Unattended Medication Cart and Unsecured Resident Ointment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. During a walkthrough of the 100 hallway near the nursing station, the state surveyor observed a medication cart that was unlocked and unattended, with no staff member present or actively supervising it. Staff near the nursing station identified RN #61 as the nurse responsible for the cart on that shift, and RN #61 later confirmed she was assigned to the cart and stated that she had given her keys to another nurse to use. The report also documented that three tubes of Bio-Freeze ointment were observed on Resident #4’s bedside shelf during a resident interview. Resident #4 stated that his wife had brought the ointment a couple of days earlier for pain and that he should have put it away. The ointment was in sight and within reach of anyone who might wander into the room. The DON, with the CEO present, confirmed the Bio-Freeze was on the resident’s shelf and stated it could not be left in the room.
Nutritional Supplements Not Offered as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were offered according to physician orders and the residents’ plans of care. During the annual survey, surveyors observed nine unopened frozen nutrient cups in the freezer section of the nourishment room on the 100 unit hall. The Unit Manager confirmed the cups were supposed to have been offered to residents and stated that sometimes residents refuse and the aides just put them in the freezer. When asked whether refusals would be reflected in the medical record, she stated that she would think so. Record review showed multiple frozen nutrient cups for residents #53, #67, #100, #41, #49, and #75 that were dated to be given at 8:00 PM on various dates, while the MAR documented 100% consumption for each of those supplements. The Unit Manager reviewed the findings and verified the supplements were to have been offered, stating that if residents refused, the aides would put them in the freezer and the refusals would be marked on the MAR.
Medication Administration Errors with Lovenox and Inhaler Use
Penalty
Summary
Medication administration errors were observed for Resident #11 during a medication pass. The LPN administered Lovenox into the resident’s lower abdominal fold, which was described as very large and having multiple bruises. The LPN wiped the skin with an alcohol pad, removed the cap, expressed the air bubble from the prefilled syringe, injected the medication, and then swabbed the injection site after removing the syringe. The DON later confirmed the LPN did not administer the Lovenox correctly and stated it should not be given within 2 inches of the umbilicus. The resident also received Budesonide-Formoterol inhalation aerosol ordered as 2 puffs twice daily for COPD, with instructions to rinse the mouth after use. During the medication pass, the LPN gave one puff, then gave the resident oral medication with water, waited approximately 3 to 5 minutes, and then gave the second puff. After the second puff, the LPN gave the resident water and instructed her to swish and spit it out. When informed of the water being given to swallow oral medications between puffs of the inhaler, the DON had no response.
Missed Lunch Tray for Resident After Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents received at least 3 meals daily at regular times comparable to normal meal times in accordance with residents’ needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care. Resident #67 stated during interview that he did not receive lunch, explaining that after returning from therapy his tray had been left on his bedside table while his roommate was eating both meals, and when he asked for another tray he was told staff would see what they could do. He reported feeling forgotten and said it was too late to get anything because dinner was approaching. A record review showed lunch trays were delivered between 12:15 PM and 12:30 PM daily, and a CNA stated she did not know Resident #67 needed a tray and apologized. She offered him a sandwich because he was concerned about dinner being close, and the sandwich and drinks were delivered later that afternoon.
Unsanitary glove use and food prep surface contamination during meal service
Penalty
Summary
Meals were not served in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional food service standards. During meal service in the dining room, a staff member serving meals removed gloves, went into the kitchen to retrieve bowls for a resident, and returned to the workspace to put on new gloves without hand washing being witnessed. Later the same staff member again left the workspace to obtain a missing item, removed gloves, and replaced them when returning, again without hand washing being witnessed. When interviewed, the staff member confirmed hand washing was not performed when leaving and returning to the workspace before reapplying gloves and stated they thought changing gloves or using alcohol rub was sufficient. During kitchen observations, the prep table and the table with rollers for the tray line had a moderate amount of food debris and sticky substance on the bottom shelf, including dried yellow substance, dried bread crumbs, and other debris. On follow-up observation, the debris was still present on the prep table, the tray line table, and the bottom shelf of the prep tables, and the dietary manager verified it needed to be cleaned. During lunch meal service, the same staff member stepped aside to obtain a hamburger bun while plating a meal, opened the package with gloved hands, handled the bun, then threw away the gloves and put on a new set without washing hands first. When questioned, the staff member stated they did not think to wash their hands.
Incomplete Admission Diagnosis Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #78 by not capturing the correct diagnosis on admission. During a facility walk-through, the surveyor observed enteric precautions signage on the resident’s door, and record review showed the resident’s diagnosis list did not match the enteric precautions orders. Further review showed the resident was admitted with a hospital discharge diagnosis of Clostridium difficile colitis, but the diagnosis of enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile was not added to the electronic record until after admission, with a creation date of 05/27/26 and an updated date of 05/26/26. The Administrator confirmed during interview that the resident’s medical record did not capture the c-diff diagnosis upon admission and that it was not added to the electronic record until 05/26/26.
Unsafe Condition in Resident Dining Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in the resident dining room. During observation, a surveyor noted an approximate 3-inch round hole in the lower left doorfacing at the back exit door, with sheet rock dust and chunks falling out and onto the floor. The condition was easily accessible to all residents in the dining room. A dietician later verified the finding during interview, and the facility administrator also acknowledged the issue.
Damaged Wall and Stained Grout in Resident Shower Room
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to the resident right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in one of two resident shower rooms on the [NAME] Fort Hall. During observation of the central shower room on the 300-400 Hall, the surveyor noted a damaged area of the wall that had been covered with black tape, as well as stained and discolored tile grout in the shower stall. These environmental issues were directly observed by the surveyor on the same day and were subsequently verified in an interview with the facility’s Director of Plant Maintenance. The facility Administrator also acknowledged these findings during the on-site observation and again at the exit conference. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were mentioned in relation to the use of this shower room; the deficiency pertains to the physical condition and cleanliness of the shower environment itself.
Failure to Maintain Environment Free from Accident Hazards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents in multiple areas. In the day room at the end of the hall, Sani wipes (purple top) cleaners were left on top of vending machines, accessible to residents, despite staff acknowledging they should not be left there. In the Internet cafe/storage area, which is open to residents and also used for staff training, there were multiple pieces of equipment such as beds, lifts, pumps, chairs, and a broken picture frame with sharp edges on the counter, all posing hazards. Additionally, exposed wiring was observed in a wall box without a cover outside a resident room, with staff reporting the wires had been exposed for some time due to ongoing hallway repainting. These conditions were observed during the survey and had the potential to affect more than one resident, with a facility census of 116 at the time.
Infection Control Lapses: Improper PPE Storage and Signage
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple infection prevention and control deficiencies within the facility. Two open soda cans were observed on a PPE cart outside a resident's room, compromising the sanitary condition of the PPE area. Additionally, three lift pads were found left exposed on top of a clean linen cart, rather than being stored inside and under cover as required. Furthermore, PPE/EBP precaution signs were posted on multiple doors without specifying which resident the precautions applied to, leading to confusion among staff regarding proper infection control procedures. These issues were confirmed through staff interviews, which revealed uncertainty and lack of adherence to established protocols.
Soiled Incontinence Briefs Left in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards by leaving soiled incontinence briefs in resident rooms after providing care. Two cognitively intact residents, both with documented capacity to make decisions, reported that soiled briefs belonging to their roommates were left on the floor or in the room, resulting in unpleasant odors. These incidents were confirmed through resident grievances and interviews, with both residents stating that the issue persisted despite some improvement. Anonymous staff interviews corroborated the residents' reports, with multiple staff members acknowledging that soiled briefs continued to be left in resident rooms or trash cans, contrary to facility protocol. The ongoing nature of the problem was noted by both residents and staff, indicating that the deficiency was not isolated but rather a recurring issue affecting the cleanliness and environment of resident rooms.
Improper Storage of Garbage and Medical Waste
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store garbage and refuse, as evidenced by an observation of the dumpster area that was found to be polluted with garbage and used medical supplies. This issue was confirmed during an interview with the Administrator, who verified the presence of trash and medical supplies on the ground around the dumpster. The deficiency has the potential to affect all residents in the facility, which had a census of 107 at the time of the observation.
Failure to Follow Through with Medication Error Correction Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow through with its plan of correction after a medication administration error was identified involving ten residents. A Registered Nurse (RN) did not administer physician-ordered medications to these residents during several consecutive night shifts. The error was discovered when the Director of Nursing (DON) conducted a random audit of the medication cart and found unopened, dated medication packets that should have been administered. Further review of the Medication Administration Report (MAR) revealed that the medications had been documented as given, despite not being administered. The residents affected had a range of medical conditions, including dementia, hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, depression, schizophrenia, COPD, hypothyroidism, and others. The medications missed included treatments for these conditions, such as insulin, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, antidepressants, supplements, and pain medications. The incident was reported to the appropriate medical professionals, pharmacy, and regulatory agencies, and the residents or their medical decision-makers were notified. Despite identifying the deficiency and outlining a plan of correction, the facility did not provide documentation that staff re-education or medication cart audits were completed as required. This lack of follow-through was confirmed by both the DON and the Regional Director of Clinical Operations, who acknowledged the absence of records for these corrective actions.
Failure to Implement Effective Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective pest control program, resulting in a widespread issue with gnats throughout the building. During the initial tour, gnats were observed on the walls and ceiling of a resident room, with a window left open and a plug-in insect trap containing multiple gnats. The Central Supply Coordinator confirmed the presence of gnats in the dining room and on resident trays, and noted that rooms where residents had episodes of incontinence were particularly affected. The exterminator reported that he had not been contacted to address the gnat problem prior to the survey, despite verifying their presence throughout the facility. The Administrator acknowledged attempts to address the issue using plug-in traps and by opening windows, and confirmed that a resident had been moved out of an affected room due to the infestation. Additionally, a resident reported having to kill gnats herself and expressed dissatisfaction with delayed garbage removal in her room, stating she had not received any follow-up from the Administrator after raising her concerns.
Failure to Ensure Dignified Dining Experience and Timely Response to Resident Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect and promote a dignified dining experience and did not respond to a resident's call light in a timely manner. During a Thanksgiving meal, a resident with severe cognitive impairment entered the dining room with a soiled brief, placed it on the table, and began playing in the feces. Multiple cognitively intact residents witnessed the incident and reported that two activity aides present did not intervene. When one resident sought help from staff on another hallway, she was told it was not their problem, and only after further effort was a CNA found to assist. The incident was corroborated by resident and staff interviews, and it was unclear whose brief was involved. The event disrupted the dining experience for all present and failed to maintain the dignity of the resident involved. In the overflow dining room, all residents were observed eating lunch off serving trays, as staff did not remove the trays after serving. A nurse aide confirmed that this was a daily occurrence. Additionally, during another meal observation, some residents at a large table received their meals significantly later than others. One resident was observed crying and repeatedly asking for food, not receiving her meal until much later, while another resident questioned the delay and also received her meal late. These delays in meal service contributed to a lack of dignity and comfort for the residents involved. The facility also failed to respond promptly to a resident's call light. A resident experiencing gastrointestinal distress used her call light and waited approximately 19 minutes for assistance. The nursing assistant who responded explained that all aides were busy with care for other residents. Other residents interviewed reported that response times for assistance could be as long as 30 minutes, with one resident stating he was only able to avoid soiling his bed because he had a catheter. These findings indicate a pattern of delayed response to resident needs and a lack of timely assistance.
Failure to Address and Respond to Resident Council Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident council grievances, issues, and concerns were acted upon promptly and that residents received a rational response. Resident council meeting minutes indicated that concerns and issues were brought up, but these were not documented in the minutes, nor were they tracked or followed up on. The activities coordinator reported that she wrote down concerns and passed them to the Nursing Home Administrator, but these were not included in the official meeting minutes. The Administrator was unable to provide documentation of grievances or concerns from past or present meetings and confirmed that he was not aware of specific requests, such as the repeated request to have the Soup of the Day placed back on the menu. Multiple residents, all of whom were cognitively intact, confirmed that they had repeatedly raised the same request during resident council meetings over several months without receiving any feedback or resolution. A review of the facility's grievance log and residents' medical charts did not show any record of these concerns being formally documented. Staff interviews further confirmed that the process for handling and responding to resident council concerns was not being followed, resulting in a lack of communication and resolution for resident-raised issues.
Failure to Secure and Maintain Confidentiality of Resident Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' personal and medical records by leaving diagnosis sheets and mini nutritional assessments in a clear acrylic wall file holder outside the Medical Records office. These documents, which contained confidential information, were accessible to anyone passing by. The forms included diagnosis sheets for several residents and mini nutritional assessments, all printed by an MDS RN. The Medical Records Coordinator confirmed during an interview that the documents were accessible and contained private information.
Dining Room Temperature Not Maintained at Comfortable Level
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by not keeping the dining room at a comfortable temperature. During an observation, several residents were noted to be cold while in the dining room: one resident was shivering and required a sweater, another verbally expressed feeling cold, a third wore extra layers and brought a blanket, and a fourth had a blanket wrapped around her. Upon request, the Maintenance Director measured the dining room temperature and found it to be 65.5 degrees Fahrenheit, below the minimum standard of 71 degrees Fahrenheit. The Maintenance Director indicated that staff sometimes turn on the air conditioner because they feel hot, which contributed to the low temperature in the dining area.
Failure to Address and Document Resident Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promptly address and resolve verbal grievances raised by multiple cognitively intact residents regarding various concerns. Several residents repeatedly requested the return of the Soup of the Day to the menu during resident council meetings, but their requests were neither acknowledged nor documented in the facility's grievance log. The Administrator was unaware of these requests and confirmed that no written grievances had been submitted or followed up on. Additionally, a resident reported issues with gnats in her room, burnt food, and garbage not being removed for several days. Despite discussing these concerns directly with the Administrator, there was no evidence of documentation or follow-up, and the issues were not recorded in the grievance log. Another resident reported missing personal property to housekeeping and laundry staff on multiple occasions, but her concerns were not documented or escalated. A housekeeper confirmed receiving these complaints but did not complete grievance forms or notify other facility staff. In all cases, the residents involved were noted to be cognitively intact and capable of accurately recalling the events. The facility's failure to document, investigate, and respond to these verbal grievances constitutes a deficiency in honoring residents' rights to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal.
Failure to Revise and Individualize Care Plans for Showers, Wound Care, and Repositioning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise and individualize comprehensive care plans for several residents in the areas of showers, wound care, and turning and repositioning. Multiple residents expressed preferences for showers over bed baths, but their care plans did not specify these preferences or document their history of refusals. For example, three residents who preferred showers did not have this preference or their refusals reflected in their care plans, despite staff and the Director of Nursing confirming these preferences and occurrences. Additionally, the care plan for a resident with a stage IV pressure ulcer to the sacrum did not identify the current wound status or include interventions or tasks for wound care, even though there were active orders and observations confirming the presence of the wound. The care plan only referenced previous or unrelated skin issues, failing to address the current stage IV ulcer and its required care. Another resident with a stage III pressure ulcer to the back, who was non-verbal and immobile, did not have care plan interventions for turning and repositioning to prevent worsening of the ulcer. Although staff reported turning the resident and there was a charting task for rolling, the care plan lacked documentation of these interventions. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan should reflect the standard practice of turning and repositioning for immobile residents with pressure ulcers.
Failure to Administer Medications and Monitor Resident Care per Orders
Penalty
Summary
A facility failed to provide resident-centered care and services in accordance with physician orders and professional nursing standards for multiple residents. Specifically, a Registered Nurse did not administer prescribed medications to ten residents during several consecutive night shifts, despite documenting in the Medication Administration Report (MAR) that the medications had been given. This discrepancy was discovered during a random audit of the medication cart, which revealed unopened, dated medication packets still present. The medications missed included treatments for conditions such as dementia, hypertension, diabetes, depression, pain, and other chronic illnesses. Additionally, a resident experienced a significant weight loss of 10.3% within one month, dropping from 208 to 186.6 pounds. Facility policy required re-weighing the resident if a five-pound fluctuation was noted, but this was not done on two occasions when such fluctuations occurred. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the policy was not followed and that the weight documentation supported the need for re-weighing. Another resident with an order for enteral feeding was found to have unclear documentation regarding the administration of 90ml pre- and post-feeding flushes. During an interview, the DON initially misidentified the flush as a nutritional supplement before correcting herself to indicate it was water for tube flushes. These findings collectively demonstrate failures in medication administration, monitoring of significant weight changes, and clarity in following physician orders for enteral feeding.
Unattended and Unlocked Medication and Treatment Carts Create Accident Hazards
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment carts were kept locked and attended, as required to maintain a safe environment free from accident hazards. On multiple occasions, three medication carts and one treatment cart were found unlocked and unattended in various hallways. Specifically, two medication carts were left unattended and unlocked at the nurses station on the 100/200 hallways, with confirmation from the responsible LPNs upon their return. Another medication cart was later found in a similar state at the nurses station on the 100 hallway, with confirmation from staff regarding responsibility for the cart. Additionally, during tracheostomy care in a resident's room, an LPN left the treatment cart unlocked and unattended in the hallway after retrieving supplies and closing the resident's door. This was confirmed by the Regional Director of Clinical Operations, who acknowledged that the treatment cart should have remained locked when not in use. These lapses in securing medication and treatment carts created accident hazards in areas accessible to residents.
Insufficient Staffing Resulting in Unmet Resident Care Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient direct care staff to meet the needs of all residents, as outlined in its own facility assessment. On multiple reviewed dates, the number of Nurse Aides present on both day and night shifts was consistently below the minimum staffing levels established by the facility. For example, on several days, only six to nine Nurse Aides were present on day shift, and as few as four on night shift, despite the facility assessment indicating a need for ten to twelve on day shift and eight to ten on night shift. These staffing shortages were confirmed through punch in and out reports and acknowledged by the Director of Nursing during an interview. As a result of these staffing deficiencies, several care issues were identified. Dependent residents were not receiving showers, and one resident was not showered at their preferred time. Additionally, a resident with a Stage III pressure ulcer was not being turned and repositioned as required, and another resident experienced significant weight loss without interventions. These findings demonstrate that the facility did not deploy enough nursing staff to meet the care needs of all residents as required.
Failure to Ensure Medication Regimens Are Free from Unnecessary Drugs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents' medication regimens were free from unnecessary drugs, as evidenced by the administration of medications without appropriate diagnoses or indications. For one resident, donepezil and trazodone were prescribed for dementia and depression, respectively, despite no documented diagnoses or supporting physician notes for either condition. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of these diagnoses and related documentation. Another resident was prescribed doxycycline for cellulitis despite a documented allergy to the medication, and the facility did not notify the physician or obtain a documented rationale for its use. The consultant pharmacist also missed this irregularity during their review, as the order was placed after the review was completed. Additionally, two other residents were found to be receiving anti-seizure medications (levetiracetam and zonisamide) without current diagnoses of seizures or epilepsy, and their care plans did not address seizure management. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of appropriate diagnoses for both residents. These findings were based on record reviews and staff interviews, and they demonstrate a pattern of medication administration without proper clinical justification or documentation.
Failure to Provide Menu Items Due to Food Shortages
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that menus were followed and that required food items were available for meal preparation, resulting in residents not receiving the meals as planned. Multiple observations and interviews revealed that residents frequently did not receive menu items due to the facility running out of food, such as milk, bread, and specific entrees. One resident reported not having milk for several days and receiving chocolate milk or orange juice as substitutes for cereal. The dietary manager confirmed that when menu items were unavailable, they simply informed the nurse aides and did not post menu changes for residents to see. Meal tickets listed specific items, but residents received different food, such as pork roast instead of chicken thigh, and did not receive items like rolls or brownies as indicated on the menu. Medical record review showed that the affected resident was on a regular diet. Observations confirmed that the resident did not receive milk with breakfast on multiple occasions, despite it being listed on the meal ticket. Staff interviews verified that the facility had been out of milk and were waiting for a delivery. The lack of adherence to the planned menu and failure to provide required food items affected more than a limited number of residents, as indicated by the facility census.
Deficient Food Safety and Sanitation Practices in Kitchen and Equipment
Penalty
Summary
During an inspection of the facility's kitchen, surveyors observed multiple failures to maintain food safety and sanitation standards. In the walk-in refrigerator, an opened container of cottage cheese was found without a label or date, and several heads of lettuce were brown and spoiled. The walk-in freezer contained boxes of hamburger patties, waffles, and french toast that were left open to the air. In dry storage, four dented cans of peaches and soups were found in circulation. The microwave had dried food debris inside, and the floors under the stove and sink area were littered with food and debris. Additionally, the stove and the exterior surfaces of refrigerators and freezers were unclean. These issues were confirmed by the Kitchen Account Manager during the tour. Further deficiencies were identified with the facility's dishwasher and ice machines. Records showed that the dishwasher's final rinse temperature had been below the recommended 180 degrees for nearly a month, yet the dietary staff continued to use the machine despite being educated on proper protocols for hand washing when temperatures were inadequate. The Kitchen Account Manager confirmed the dishwasher was not functioning properly. Additionally, a tour of the pantry areas revealed that the ice machine drains lacked the required air gap, with drain pipes touching the drains due to broken brackets, a fact confirmed by the Maintenance Director.
Failure to Maintain Infection Prevention and Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple observed deficiencies. One incident involved a resident with cognitive impairment who entered the dining room with a soiled brief, placed it on the table, and began playing in feces in the presence of other residents and two activity aides. The aides did not intervene, and staff from another hallway declined to assist when asked by residents. Eventually, another resident located a CNA from the appropriate hallway, who then intervened to address the situation. Multiple cognitively intact residents confirmed the sequence of events and the lack of timely staff response. Additional observations revealed environmental sanitation issues, including overflowing trash and soiled linen barrels with lids off in a hallway, and soiled linens left on the floor near a resident room. These conditions were acknowledged by staff present at the time, who confirmed that the waste containers had been in that state for several hours. A further deficiency was observed during wound care for a resident requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The resident, who had multiple wounds including venous stasis ulcers, a diabetic foot ulcer, and an abscess, did not have EBP signage posted in the room. The nurse practitioner and LPN performing wound care did not don appropriate PPE before entering the room or providing care. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident should have been on EBP, but the signage and orders were not in place at the time of the observation.
Black Substance and Debris Found on PTAC Units and Ceiling Vents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment for its residents, staff, and the public, as evidenced by the presence of a black substance around packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) units in the dining rooms and on ceiling vents throughout the building. During an observation, surveyors noted the black substance and debris on and around these units and vents. The Maintenance Director confirmed the presence of the black substance and debris during interviews conducted at the time of the observations. These findings had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, which had a census of 107 at the time of the survey.
Failure to Provide Written Notice Before Room Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor residents' rights by not providing written notice, including the reason for the change, prior to transferring two residents to different rooms. Record reviews showed that one resident was moved from one room to another on 11/16/24, and another resident was moved on 11/29/24, with neither receiving the required written notification before the room change. During an interview, the Social Worker confirmed that no written notice was given to either resident before their transfers.
Failure to Honor Resident's Shower Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor and facilitate a resident's right to self-determination by not providing showers according to her stated preferences. The resident, who is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and has been deemed capacitated by a physician, reported that she often had to repeatedly request showers and still did not receive them at her preferred times. She expressed that she wanted showers in the afternoons and an extra shower on Sundays to be clean for dialysis on Mondays, but was instead scheduled for showers on the night shift, which she found unsuitable due to cold temperatures and the inconvenience of having wet hair before leaving for dialysis. Record review showed multiple documented refusals of showers by the resident, with no reasons noted in the progress notes. During interviews, the resident explained her refusals were due to the timing of the showers being too early in the morning or too late at night, which did not align with her preferences. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident had communicated her desired changes in shower times to both nurses and aides, but her preferences were not accommodated, and her schedule remained unchanged.
Incomplete PASARR Documentation for Resident Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's Pre-Admission Screening (PAS) accurately reflected all pre-admission diagnoses. Record review showed that the resident had diagnoses of Major Depression Disorder and Epilepsy. However, the PAS completed for the resident did not include the Epilepsy diagnosis under the section for current diagnoses, and only listed major depression under the section for major mental illness or suspected mental illness. During staff interview, the Director of Social Services confirmed that the resident's Epilepsy diagnosis had not been captured on the PAS.
Failure to Implement and Update Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to fully implement and update care plans for three residents, resulting in deficiencies related to monitoring, documentation, and individualized interventions. For one resident with behavioral issues, staff did not consistently monitor and document behaviors as required by the care plan and physician orders, with specific dates noted where monitoring was missed. The Director of Nursing confirmed these lapses in behavior monitoring. Another resident, who had a documented incident of physical aggression toward a roommate, did not have this history reflected in her care plan, and the DON acknowledged the care plan was not updated to include this information. Additionally, a resident with legal blindness had a care plan that lacked specific interventions to address her needs, such as guidance on meal tray arrangement and organization of personal items for accessibility. Observations showed that this resident was not engaged in activities or provided with individualized support, despite her care plan indicating encouragement for participation. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of tailored interventions and engagement for this resident.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary services to assist residents with activities of daily living, specifically showers, for residents who were unable to perform these tasks independently. For one resident, although the care plan and shower schedule indicated showers were to be provided twice weekly, documentation showed that only five out of eight scheduled showers were given over a thirty-day period, with no refusals recorded and no care plan documentation of a history of refusals. This resulted in a nine-day gap without a shower for this resident. Another resident, also scheduled for twice-weekly showers, received only two out of eight scheduled showers in the same period. While two refusals were documented, there were still significant gaps in care, including a seventeen-day period without a shower. Both residents expressed a preference for showers over bed baths and reported not receiving showers as ordered. These findings were confirmed with the Director of Nursing.
Failure to Consistently Turn and Reposition Immobile Resident with Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when an immobile, non-verbal resident with a stage III pressure ulcer on her left back was not turned and repositioned according to standard nursing practice. The resident, who is totally dependent on staff for mobility and has contractures preventing self-repositioning, had a care plan and physician orders for wound care but lacked documented interventions or tasks for regular turning and repositioning to prevent further skin breakdown. Staff interviews confirmed that there was no routine charting system for turning, and although some staff reported turning the resident, documentation did not support consistent implementation of this intervention. A review of the resident's records over a 30-day period revealed that she was turned and repositioned only 51 times, far below the expected 360 opportunities if performed every two hours as per standard practice. There were also days with no documentation of turning or repositioning. The DON confirmed that the resident had not been turned and repositioned according to standard practice, which is necessary to prevent new or worsening pressure ulcers.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain adequate nutritional status for a resident who experienced a significant weight loss of 10.3% within one month. The resident's weight dropped from 208 pounds to 186.6 pounds over a 30-day period, which meets the criteria for significant weight loss. The resident was on a regular diet with diabetic condiments and no salt packet, and there were no supplements, snacks, or additional protein sources ordered. Meal intake records indicated the resident typically consumed between 51-100% of meals. Despite the documented weight loss, there were no new dietary assessments or progress notes entered after the weight loss was recorded, and the DON confirmed the absence of a dietary assessment in response to the weight loss.
Delayed Physician Response to New Onset Symptoms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a physician or their delegate responded in a timely manner to a new onset of symptoms in a resident. Specifically, a nursing assistant reported blood in a resident's catheter bag to an LPN, who assessed the catheter and found no abnormalities, with the resident reporting no pain or discomfort. The LPN sent a secure message to both the nurse practitioner and the medical director and attempted to contact the resident's medical power of attorney, but neither the nurse practitioner nor the medical director responded to the message. The resident was later seen by the nurse practitioner two days after the initial report, at which time the resident was found to be acutely hypoxic with Cheyne-Stokes respiration and cyanosis, and subsequently experienced cessation of respiration within ten minutes.
Lack of Physician Response to Pharmacy Medication Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a physician responded to recommendations made by a licensed pharmacist regarding residents' medication regimens. For one resident, pharmacy recommendations to reassess a PRN order for Lorazepam and to address possible duplicate orders for Tramadol and Ativan were documented, but there was no evidence that the physician acknowledged, agreed, disagreed, or provided any rationale for these recommendations. Additionally, for another resident, the physician did not provide a rationale for the use of a medication to which the resident had a documented allergy. These deficiencies were confirmed during a review of records with the Assistant Director of Nursing, where it was noted that there were no physician signatures, dates, or documented rationales in response to the pharmacist's recommendations.
Failure to Offer Meal Substitutes When Residents Refused Food
Penalty
Summary
During the morning meal service on the 400 Hall, two residents refused their breakfast trays by stating, "No thanks." The certified nursing assistant (CNA) responsible for meal delivery removed the trays from their room but did not offer any alternative food options. When questioned, the CNA explained that an alternative was not offered because one of the residents typically only likes sweets for breakfast and would have accepted the meal if it had been a cinnamon roll. The Director of Nursing later confirmed that all aides are trained to offer residents the opportunity to receive a substitute if they are unhappy with the meal served. This incident demonstrates that the facility failed to provide residents with the opportunity to receive a substitute meal when they refused the food items offered, as required by facility policy and training.
Incomplete and Invalid POST Forms in Resident Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for three out of four residents reviewed, specifically regarding their Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms. For one resident, both the electronic and original POST forms were missing the physician's signature, phone number, and license number, rendering the form invalid. Another resident's POST form was missing the physician's phone number in both the electronic chart and the original document, which would prevent timely contact with the physician if needed. A third resident's POST form indicated that verbal consent was accepted from the legal decision maker, but the facility did not obtain an original signature, despite the legal representative's participation in subsequent care conferences where the POST form was reviewed. In each case, the Director of Social Services confirmed the deficiencies in the documentation, acknowledging that the forms were incomplete or invalid due to missing required information.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 98 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Clarksburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarksburg Healthcare Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Bridgeport Healthcare Center | 3.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Maplewood Healthcare Center | 6.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| United Transitional Care Center | 6.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Crestview Manor Healthcare | 11.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for River Oaks Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.