Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Hampshire Memorial Hospital during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Incorrect code status documentation was found for two residents who had chosen DNR status. Staff used multiple sources to verify code status, including the physician order, POST form, chart markings, medication room list, door stickers, and the daily assignment sheet, but the daily assignment sheet and medication room list still showed the residents as FULL CODE even after one resident’s POST form had been updated to DNR and the other resident already had a DNR POST form. An RN said she had been told of the change but had not updated everything yet.
A resident with diabetic neuropathy had a scheduled Gabapentin order, but the MAR was left blank for multiple 2:00 PM doses over several months. The DON confirmed the missing documentation and stated that MAR documentation is required to show the medication was administered per the physician’s order.
Unsafe food storage and kitchen sanitation were observed during a kitchen walkthrough. Multiple food items, including frozen fruit, pickles, ice cream, sherbet, tater tots, sausage patties, and liquid eggs, lacked an opened-on date or use-by date. Two dietary employees were not wearing beard nets, and the trash can had no lid; the Dietary Manager verified the findings.
Improper infection control was observed during medication administration for a resident. An LPN placed Flonase nasal spray and Moxifloxin eye drops directly on the over-the-bed table without using a barrier, and later confirmed no barrier was used. The DON confirmed the medications should have been placed on a barrier.
A resident’s comprehensive care plan did not include the resident’s preference or potential for future discharge. Record review found no evidence that the facility assessed whether the resident wanted to return to the community or evaluated discharge potential, and the DON confirmed the item had been missed.
A resident's record contained an active order to monitor for antidepressant side effects even though Trazodone had already been discontinued, and the DON confirmed the order should have been discontinued. In a separate record, another resident's POST form showed CPR in Section A and limited additional interventions in Section B, which the DON confirmed was contradictory and potentially confusing to providers.
The QAPI meetings did not include all required members for two out of four meetings reviewed. Specifically, the Medical Director or a designee did not attend the meeting on one occasion, and another required staff member was absent on another occasion. This was confirmed by the DON.
The facility failed to provide residents the opportunity to file grievances anonymously by not making grievance forms accessible. The DON confirmed that forms are kept in her office, requiring residents to go through staff to file a grievance. During a Resident Council meeting, residents expressed a desire to file grievances anonymously.
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for seven residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their medical needs. Issues included unaddressed weight loss, contractures, hypertension, edema, use of medical devices, and psychotropic medications. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed these oversights.
The facility failed to document vital signs when medications were held for two residents and did not follow the physician's order for side rails for another resident. This was confirmed through record reviews and staff interviews.
The facility failed to manage and monitor psychotropic medications for several residents, including the lack of documentation for behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, and side effects. This led to the inappropriate use of medications like Seroquel, Zoloft, and Buspar without proper oversight.
The facility failed to store medications according to professional principles, with expired intravenous fluids found and a narcotic emergency box not properly secured. The deficiencies were confirmed by the RN and DON during a random observation.
The facility failed to ensure that all dietary staff had the required Food Handlers/SafeServ certification, as one of the eight staff members lacked this mandatory certification. This was confirmed by the County Sanitarian and the Director of Nursing.
The facility's QAA Committee failed to identify and correct deficiencies in prescribing and monitoring psychotropic medications, affecting four residents. The DON admitted the committee was unaware of these issues, and there was a lack of documentation for non-pharmacological interventions, behaviors, and side effects. This oversight highlights systemic issues in the facility's monitoring and documentation practices.
A resident with dementia was prescribed Seroquel for depression without informing the responsible party of the risks and benefits. The DON confirmed the lack of documentation and communication, noting it as an ongoing issue in the facility.
The facility failed to notify the representatives of two residents about significant changes in their status. One resident experienced significant weight loss without the representative being informed, and another resident was prescribed a new medication without notifying the responsible party.
The facility failed to issue the required SNF ABN CMS 10055 to three residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services but chose to remain at the facility with benefit days remaining. This was confirmed by the DON and CCMDS during an interview.
The facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide timely interventions for two residents experiencing significant weight loss. Despite notable weight fluctuations, there were no appropriate re-weighs, nutritional assessments, or notifications to the physician and dietitian, leading to a lack of timely interventions.
The facility failed to ensure that residents' significant weight loss was promptly reported to a physician. Two residents experienced substantial weight loss without timely physician notification or adherence to the facility's weight monitoring policy, as confirmed by staff interviews and record reviews.
A facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia received appropriate treatment and services, including a person-centered care plan with non-pharmacological interventions. The resident was prescribed antipsychotic medication without documented behaviors justifying its use, and staff-managed behaviors informally without proper documentation.
The facility failed to honor dietary preferences for two residents. One resident received tomato soup instead of chicken noodle soup, and another did not receive a turkey salad sandwich as indicated on their tray tickets. Both residents expressed that they often did not receive the food items they wanted, and the discrepancies were confirmed by a Clinical Coordinator.
The facility failed to ensure complete and accurate POST forms for two residents. One resident's form was missing identifying information and details on Medically Assisted Nutrition, while another resident's form had an entirely blank second page. The DON confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility failed to record the actual hours worked per shift for Nurse Aides, LPNs, and RNs. The DON was unaware of the requirement to record hours per shift, leading to incomplete staff postings. This affected all 27 residents.
Incorrect Code Status Documentation for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that code status documentation matched for Resident #20 and Resident #25, both of whom had requested DNR status. Staff reported that code status could be checked using the physician order, POST form, code status on the outside of the medical chart, the full code list posted in the medication room, heart stickers on full code residents’ doors, and sometimes the daily assignment sheet. The DON also stated that staff sometimes deferred to the daily assignment sheet, which was kept on a clipboard on the medication cart for shift-to-shift report. Resident #20’s daily assignment sheet dated 01/03/26 incorrectly listed the resident as FULL CODE, even though the resident had a POST form dated 10/17/25 showing a DNR choice. Resident #25 had a care plan meeting on 01/21/26, and the POST form was updated to reflect DNR status, but observation in the medication room on 01/22/26 showed the resident still on the FULL CODE list. The daily assignment sheet dated 01/22/26 also listed Resident #25 as full code, and an RN stated she had been told the resident had been switched to DNR but had not yet updated everything.
Incomplete MAR Documentation for Scheduled Gabapentin
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow the physician’s order for Gabapentin for Resident #7, who had an order for Gabapentin oral capsule 100 mg by mouth three times a day for diabetic neuropathy. Review of the resident’s MARs from August 2025 through January 2026 showed blank documentation entries for the 2:00 PM dose on 08/03/25, 10/21/25, 12/14/25, and 01/18/26. During interview, the DON confirmed the blank MAR entries and stated that the professional standard of practice was for nurses to document on the MAR when medication was successfully administered, and agreed that without documentation there was no evidence the medication had been given per the physician’s order.
Unsafe Food Storage and Kitchen Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
Safe storage of food was not ensured in the kitchen during the initial walkthrough. Several food items were found without an opened-on date or use-by date, including frozen strawberries, frozen blueberries, pickles, ice cream, sherbet, tater tots, sausage patties, and liquid eggs. Dietary Employee #32 and Dietary Employee #53 were observed not wearing beard nets, and the trash can did not have a lid. The Dietary Manager verified these observations.
Improper Infection Control During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a proper infection control program for medication administration during an observed medication pass for Resident #7. On 01/23/26 at 8:34 AM, LPN #19 was observed administering Flonase nasal spray and Moxifloxin eye drops in the resident's room and placed both medications directly on the over-the-bed table without using a barrier. At 8:41 AM, LPN #19 confirmed that no barrier had been used. At 8:48 AM, the DON was notified and confirmed that the medications should have been placed on a barrier.
Care Plan Missing Discharge Preference and Potential
Penalty
Summary
The comprehensive care plan for Resident #10 did not include the resident’s preference and potential for future discharge. During record review completed on 01/21/2026 at 11:44 AM, there was no evidence that the facility had assessed whether the resident desired to return to the community or evaluated the resident’s potential for discharge from the facility. In an interview on 01/21/2026 at 1:35 PM, the DON confirmed that Resident #10’s care plan did not include the resident’s preference and potential for discharge and stated that it had been missed.
Inaccurate Medication Documentation and Contradictory POST Form
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation for a discontinued medication for Resident #14. During record review, a physician's order was found that stated, "Continue to monitor for antidepressant side effects," even though the antidepressant Trazodone had already been discontinued. The Director of Nursing later confirmed that the physician's order should have been discontinued. The facility also failed to maintain an accurate medical record for Resident #25 related to the POST form. Review of the scanned POST form showed Section A marked for CPR and Section B marked for limited additional interventions. The WV Center for End-of-Life Care guidance identified this combination as contradictory, and the DON confirmed that the choices were contradictory and could be confusing to providers.
QAPI Meetings Missing Required Members
Penalty
Summary
The Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at the facility did not include all required members for two out of four meetings reviewed. Specifically, the sign-in sheet for the meeting on 05/31/23 indicated that neither the Medical Director nor a designee attended. Additionally, the sign-in sheet for the meeting on 09/01/23 showed that while the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, facility vice-president, and Infection Preventionist attended, another required staff member did not. This deficiency was confirmed by the Director of Nursing during an interview on 02/22/24. The facility census at the time was 27 residents.
Failure to Provide Anonymous Grievance Filing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents the opportunity to file grievances anonymously by not making grievance forms accessible to residents. On 02/20/24 at 11:10 AM, it was observed that there were no grievance forms accessible for residents to obtain on their own. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the forms are kept in her office in a file cabinet, requiring residents to go through a staff member to file a grievance. Additionally, during a Resident Council meeting on 02/21/24, 14 residents stated they could not file grievances anonymously and expressed a desire to do so. This deficiency was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 02/22/24 at 9:10 AM.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive care plans for seven residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their medical needs. Resident #1 had a documented history of weight loss, but no care plan was developed to address this issue. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing. Resident #27 was admitted with contractures to the left shoulder and elbow, but these were not included in the care plan. Similarly, Resident #24 had a physician's order for Lasix to treat hypertension and edema, but these conditions were not care planned, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing. Resident #11 had a physician's order for a cockup brace for a broken wrist, but the care plan did not mention the brace, and there was no diagnosis for its use. The resident's Licensed Practical Nurse and the Clinical Coordinator were unaware of the brace's purpose. Resident #13, diagnosed with dementia and depression, was prescribed Lexapro and Seroquel, but the care plan did not address the use of these medications or the resident's dementia. Staff interviews revealed the resident exhibited signs of distress, such as anxiety and wandering, but these behaviors were not documented in the care plan. Resident #20's care plan included an intervention to check for residuals before tube feedings, but there was no documentation that this was being done. The Clinical Coordinator confirmed this oversight. Resident #3's care plan mentioned the use of Buspar for anxiety but did not include information on triggers or non-pharmacological interventions. The resident's Licensed Practical Nurse and Clinical Coordinator confirmed the care plan's inadequacies. These deficiencies were identified through record reviews and staff interviews, highlighting the facility's failure to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for its residents.
Failure to Document Vital Signs and Follow Physician's Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. For Resident #13, the facility did not document vital signs when medications Lisinopril and Metoprolol were held due to low systolic blood pressure and pulse rate, respectively. The Medication Administration Records (MAR) were marked to indicate the medications were held, but the corresponding blood pressure and pulse rates were not recorded in the resident's medical record. This was confirmed by the Clinical Coordinator during an interview. For Resident #7, the facility did not document the reasons for withholding Metoprolol Tartrate on eight out of fourteen occasions. The MAR showed the medication was held, but there was no documentation of the resident's heart rate or blood pressure for those instances. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing. Additionally, for Resident #11, the facility did not follow the physician's order for side rails. The resident was observed with both right and left side rails up, despite the physician's order specifying only a quarter rail on the right side. This discrepancy was confirmed through observations and record reviews with nursing staff.
Failure to Monitor and Manage Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that each resident's drug/medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #13 was prescribed Seroquel without adequate documentation of behaviors or non-pharmacological interventions prior to its initiation. The care plan did not address the use of Seroquel, and there was no monitoring for side effects or efficacy. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident was anxious and missed his wife, but non-pharmacological interventions like watching shows or talking to family were used without documentation of their effectiveness or the need for Seroquel. Resident #24 had a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies and was prescribed Seroquel and Depakote for behaviors with hallucinations. However, there was no documentation to monitor the side effects of these psychotropic medications. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of monitoring systems for side effects, which is a regulatory requirement. Resident #7, diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and recurrent major depressive disorder, was prescribed Zoloft and Ativan. The care plan and progress notes lacked documentation to monitor side effects or behaviors. Similarly, Resident #3, who was prescribed Buspar for anxiety, had no documentation of tearfulness episodes or monitoring of the medication's efficacy. The Director of Nursing confirmed these deficiencies, indicating a systemic issue in the facility's medication management and monitoring processes.
Medication Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles of practice. During an observation of the medication room, two out of three bags of intravenous fluids were found to be expired. These bags contained 5% dextrose and 0.45% sodium chloride. The Registered Nurse present confirmed the expiration of these fluids. This deficiency was identified during a random observation and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents in the facility, which had a census of 27 at the time of the survey. Additionally, the facility did not properly secure a narcotic emergency box. The box, which contained various controlled substances such as Duragesic (Fentanyl) patches, Morphine, Methadone, Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone, and Oxycodone, was found in a locked cabinet but was not affixed to it. This meant that anyone with access to the keys for the medication room and the cabinet could remove the box. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the narcotic emergency box was not affixed to the cabinet, further highlighting the lapse in proper medication storage protocols.
Insufficient Competency in Dietary Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. Specifically, one of the eight dietary staff members did not have their Food Handlers/SafeServ certification. This deficiency was identified when the Dietary Manager was unable to provide the required certification for the staff member. The County Sanitarian confirmed that the certification is mandatory for working in any food area in the county. This finding was corroborated by the Director of Nursing.
Failure to Monitor and Document Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify and correct quality deficiencies related to the prescribing and monitoring of psychotropic medications. The Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee was unaware of the deficiencies until the survey began. The Director of Nursing (DON) admitted that the committee had not been aware of antipsychotic medications being prescribed without adequate documented indications, the failure to address non-pharmacological interventions prior to starting psychotropic medications, and the lack of monitoring for medication side effects and efficacy. This oversight had the potential to affect four out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, with a facility census of 27 residents. Resident #13 was admitted without any psychotropic medications but was later prescribed Lexapro for depression and subsequently Seroquel without documented behaviors justifying its use. Interviews with the resident's caregivers revealed that non-pharmacological interventions were used but not documented, and the care plan did not include the use of Seroquel or any specific behaviors or side effects to monitor. The DON confirmed that there was no documentation to support the use of Seroquel and that this was a recurring issue with the nursing staff. Resident #24 had a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies and was prescribed Seroquel and Depakote for behaviors with hallucinations. However, there was no documentation to monitor the side effects of these medications. Similarly, Resident #7, who had a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder and recurrent major depressive disorder, was prescribed Zoloft and Ativan without any systems in place to monitor side effects or behaviors. Resident #3, who was prescribed Buspar for anxiety, also had no documentation of tearfulness episodes or monitoring of the medication's efficacy. The DON confirmed these deficiencies, highlighting a systemic issue in the facility's monitoring and documentation practices.
Failure to Inform Responsible Party of Antipsychotic Medication Risks and Benefits
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform the responsible party of the risks and benefits of administering an antipsychotic medication to a resident diagnosed with dementia. The resident, who lacked capacity to make medical decisions, was prescribed Seroquel for depression without documented evidence that the resident's wife, acting as the health care surrogate, was informed about the medication. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there were no documented behaviors justifying the use of Seroquel and acknowledged that the physician and nurse practitioner did not address the medication in their notes. This issue was identified as an ongoing problem within the facility, where nurses frequently administer medications for behaviors without proper documentation or communication with responsible parties.
Failure to Notify Representatives of Significant Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the residents' representatives when Resident #20 experienced significant weight loss and when Resident #13 had a significant alteration in treatment. Resident #20, who lacked sufficient mental capacity to make health care decisions, experienced a 10% weight loss over six months and a 7% weight loss in one month. Despite these significant changes, there was no documentation that the resident's representative was notified until new orders were instituted to address the weight loss on 01/17/24. Clinical Coordinator #6 confirmed the lack of documentation regarding notification of the resident's representative before this date. Resident #13, diagnosed with dementia and lacking capacity to make medical decisions, had a new medication, Seroquel, prescribed for depression. The medical record showed no evidence that the resident's wife, who was appointed as his health care surrogate, was notified of this new prescription. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of documentation indicating that the responsible party was contacted before starting the medication.
Failure to Issue Required Beneficiary Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three residents received the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) CMS 10055 when they were discharged from Medicare Part A services but chose to remain at the facility with benefit days remaining. Specifically, one resident was discharged on 11/15/23, another on 11/04/23, and the third on 10/29/23. This deficiency was confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Clinical Coordinator, Minimum Data Set (CCMDS) during an interview on 02/20/24. The facility's entrance conference worksheet indicated these discharges, but the necessary beneficiary notices were not issued to the residents involved.
Failure to Monitor and Address Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide timely interventions for residents experiencing weight loss. This deficiency was identified for two residents. Resident #17 experienced significant weight fluctuations without appropriate re-weighs or interventions. Despite a notable weight loss of 19.53% from 12/01/23 to 02/08/24, there were no new interventions, nutritional assessments, or progress notes indicating that the physician or dietitian had been notified. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident should have been reweighed and that the physician and dietitian should have been notified to maintain professional standards of practice. Resident #20 also experienced significant weight loss without timely interventions. The resident's weight dropped from 144.6 lbs. on 04/05/23 to 113 lbs. on 01/10/24. Despite this 21.8% weight loss, there were no nutritional assessments or interventions documented until 01/17/24. The Clinical Coordinator confirmed that the resident's weight loss had not been addressed in a timely manner and that the resident had not been reweighed as specified in the facility's policy. The facility's failure to follow its own policy for monitoring and addressing weight loss resulted in a lack of timely interventions for both residents. This included the absence of reweighs, nutritional assessments, and notifications to the physician and dietitian, which are critical for maintaining the residents' nutritional status and overall health.
Failure to Notify Physician of Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents' care after significant weight loss was supervised by a physician. For Resident #20, the electronic health record showed a weight loss of 10% over six months and 7% in one month, with no documentation that the physician had been notified until much later. The resident, who was receiving feeding via a PEG tube and no nutrition by mouth, continued to lose weight significantly before the physician was finally notified and a change in the tube feeding infusion amount was ordered. This lack of timely notification and intervention was confirmed by the Clinical Coordinator. Similarly, Resident #1 experienced significant weight loss of greater than 5% in one month on two occasions within five months. The facility's policy required re-weighing for weight changes of plus or minus 5 pounds, but this was not done. The physician was not informed of the weight loss in a timely manner, with delays in notification of up to several weeks. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing. The failure to notify the physician promptly and to follow the facility's weight monitoring policy contributed to the deficiency in care for these residents.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Dementia Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident diagnosed with dementia received appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The resident, who was admitted without any psychotropic medications, was later prescribed Lexapro for depression and subsequently Seroquel without documented behaviors justifying its use. The care plan did not address the resident's dementia diagnosis or include individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care, such as meaningful activities tailored to his interests and preferences. Staff interviews revealed that the resident frequently expressed a desire to go home and missed his wife, leading to anxiety and wandering behaviors. Various staff members noted that the resident could be distracted by watching rodeo shows, faith-based programs, and other content on the computer, but these interventions were not documented in the care plan. The resident's behaviors, such as becoming anxious in the evenings and expressing a desire to go home, were managed informally by staff without a structured, documented approach. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the lack of documentation for the use of Seroquel and the absence of a care plan addressing the resident's dementia. The DON confirmed that non-pharmacological interventions used by staff were not care planned, and there was no documentation of behaviors to support the use of antipsychotic medication. The facility's failure to develop a person-centered care plan and document non-pharmacological interventions contributed to the deficiency in providing appropriate dementia care for the resident.
Failure to Honor Dietary Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure dietary preferences were honored for two residents. Resident #3 was observed eating grilled cheese, tomato soup, and peaches, despite her tray ticket indicating she was to receive double noodle chicken soup. Resident #3 expressed her dislike for tomato soup and mentioned that she often did not receive the food items she wanted. Clinical Coordinator #6 confirmed the discrepancy. Similarly, Resident #10 was observed eating French fries and peaches without the turkey salad sandwich indicated on her tray ticket. Resident #10 also stated that she often did not receive the food items she wanted. Clinical Coordinator #6 confirmed the missing sandwich. These observations and interviews indicate a failure to follow the residents' dietary preferences as specified on their tray tickets.
Incomplete POST Forms for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records were available for two residents regarding their Physicians Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms. For Resident #17, the POST form was incomplete, missing identifying information such as the middle initial, last four numbers of the social security number, and address on page one. Additionally, Section D for Medically Assisted Nutrition was not addressed, and page two only included the resident's name and the Medical Power of Attorney name, without the Primary Care Provider's name or telephone number. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing. Similarly, for Resident #27, the POST form was also incomplete, with page two left entirely blank. The Director of Nursing confirmed that at a minimum, the form should include the resident's name, Medical Power of Attorney, and Primary Care Provider's name and telephone number.
Failure to Record Actual Hours Worked Per Shift
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting included the actual amount of hours worked per each shift for Nurse Aides, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Registered Nurses. This deficiency was observed on 02/19/24, where the staff posting did not record the actual number of hours worked per shift. The Director of Nursing (DON) admitted on 02/20/24 that she was unaware that the hours had to be recorded for each shift, believing instead that the hours needed to be recorded for the entire day. A review of the daily posted staffing sheets from 02/06/24 until the present confirmed that the facility only recorded the hours worked by each discipline for the day, not for each shift. This oversight had the potential to affect all 27 residents at the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 241 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Romney
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hampshire Center | 0.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Dawnview Llc | 13 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Keyser Healthcare Center | 17.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 1 |
| E.a. Hawse Healthcare Center | 19 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Cumberland Healthcare Center | 21.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 27 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Hampshire Memorial Hospital.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.