Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Brewster Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility’s infection prevention and control program was deficient because its Legionella water management program did not include a building assessment identifying areas where Legionella could develop. In addition, an LPN removed PPE after wound care for a resident on EBP, and during repositioning the LPN and CNA did not wear gowns as required for direct care. The resident had a stage 4 pressure injury, osteomyelitis, and a BIMS score of 12, and the DON confirmed repositioning required gown and glove use.
A resident with multiple comorbidities and intact cognition was transported in a facility van without a seatbelt or wheelchair tie-downs, and an abrupt stop caused the resident to slide or fall forward in the wheelchair, resulting in pain, stiffness, and bruising noted in clinical documentation. The facility’s policy requires reporting all allegations of abuse, neglect, and rights violations to appropriate agencies, but the PM and DON determined this event was not an allegation of neglect and did not report it to the State Agency, despite the resident’s reported symptoms and observed physical findings.
A resident with multiple comorbidities and intact cognition reported that a van driver failed to secure their wheelchair with a seatbelt or tie-downs during transport, leading to an abrupt stop in which the resident slid forward and later reported rib, back, and lower extremity pain, as well as right knee redness and bruising. The facility delayed interviews of the resident and the driver, did not document the driver’s admitted failure to secure the wheelchair, and did not complete or document pain or skin assessments or monitoring of the knee bruise. The facility also did not interview other residents who used the van for similar experiences or provide documented education to other van drivers on safe transport or abuse/neglect policies, resulting in a deficient investigation of the neglect allegation.
A resident with paraplegia and multiple comorbidities, who was cognitively intact and frequently transported by facility van, was taken to an appointment in a wheelchair without being secured by wheelchair tie-downs or a seat belt, contrary to facility policy requiring both. The van driver, a maintenance staff member who reported limited training and discomfort with transporting residents, drove slowly but made an abrupt stop, causing the unsecured resident to slide in the wheelchair, strike objects on the van floor, and later report rib, back, leg pain, and bruising to the knee. Nursing and physician documentation confirmed post-incident pain, stiffness, and bruising, and the driver acknowledged both the lack of restraints during transport and the need to physically reposition the resident despite policy that non-certified staff should not lift or transfer residents.
Bedside Medications Kept Without Authorization: Pharmaceutical services did not meet the needs of 2 residents when medications were found at the bedside without a self-administration assessment or order allowing bedside storage. One resident had melatonin at the bedside despite no order or care plan indication for sleep medication, and another resident had nicotine patches and inhalers from home at the bedside even though the resident said nurses administered medications and staff confirmed there was no order to keep them there.
A resident admitted with a left humerus fracture, weakness, and identified fall risk had a care plan requiring that the call light be kept within reach. During a night shift, a CNA assisted the resident to the bathroom and into a recliner but left the room call light clipped to the bed several feet away and did not apply the resident’s personal call device, leaving no accessible means to request help. The cognitively intact resident, who typically used the call light and had not previously self-transferred, attempted an unassisted transfer to the bathroom, resulting in an unwitnessed fall. The resident was later found on the floor with the call light out of reach and was hospitalized, where imaging showed a worsened comminuted left humerus fracture, an acute to subacute L1 compression fracture, and a scalp hematoma, ultimately requiring surgical repair of the shoulder.
The facility did not honor a resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and failed to establish a grievance policy or make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
A resident with a preference for Spanish and interpreter services was not consistently provided with these services, leading to communication barriers. The resident's care plan did not address the language barrier, and staff often relied on gestures or family members for translation. This resulted in unmet needs and misunderstandings, such as difficulty in requesting medication and receiving disliked food items.
The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three residents, including one with moderately impaired cognition and hand contractures, another who was severely cognitively impaired, and a third with moderate cognitive impairment. Despite staff acknowledging the issue, no alternative notification devices were provided, and systemic solutions were lacking.
A resident with multiple health conditions developed skin wounds that were identified by nursing staff but not reported to the physician until several days later, contrary to the facility's policy. The wounds, initially assessed as moisture-associated skin damage, were later diagnosed as unstageable pressure injuries. Interviews with staff confirmed that the physician should have been notified immediately upon discovery of the wounds.
A facility failed to provide necessary care for a resident requiring oxygen therapy. The resident, diagnosed with congestive heart failure, dementia, and pneumonia, had a physician order for oxygen but lacked a care plan for its use. The facility's policy required changing oxygen tubing after a respiratory infection, but there was no documentation of this being done. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the deficiency, as the resident's oxygen tubing change could not be verified.
A resident with end-stage renal disease and dependence on dialysis did not have a dialysis care plan, and facility staff failed to monitor the resident's fistula or assist with personal hygiene before dialysis appointments. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight, noting that the care plan should have included dialysis and fistula monitoring.
A resident with multiple health conditions, including end-stage renal disease, was found with a tube of 1% hydrocortisone cream in their room without a self-administration assessment. The facility's policy requires such an assessment to ensure safe medication storage and administration, but this was not conducted, as confirmed by the DON.
A resident with a history of brain dysfunction and bipolar disorder was prescribed psychotropic medications, including diazepam and quetiapine fumarate, without adequate monitoring for adverse reactions. The facility's policy required monitoring for effectiveness and side effects, but the resident's medical record, MAR, and care plan lacked documentation of such monitoring. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed the absence of monitoring interventions, highlighting a deficiency in adhering to the facility's policy.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies. A CNA did not follow proper hand hygiene and glove-changing protocols during incontinence care for a resident with severe cognitive impairment. Two CNAs failed to wear required PPE while repositioning a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Additionally, a resident with pneumonia was not placed on droplet precautions despite exhibiting symptoms, highlighting lapses in infection control measures.
The facility did not offer the PCV20 vaccine to two residents with Alzheimer's dementia, despite CDC guidelines recommending it. One resident had previously declined other pneumococcal vaccines, while the other had received earlier versions but not the PCV20. The DON confirmed the oversight, acknowledging the vaccine should have been offered.
Infection Prevention Program Lacked Legionella Assessment and PPE Was Not Used During EBP Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. During review of the facility’s Legionella Water Management Program, the documentation provided included the Legionella Water Management policy and temperature and flush schedules, but it did not contain a facility assessment of the building identifying potential areas of concern where Legionella could develop. The Facility Operations Manager stated that only a policy with key points was available and was not aware that a facility assessment was needed, and later verified that the facility did not have a building assessment identifying potential areas of concern where Legionella could develop. The facility’s Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth policy stated that the facility risk assessment had identified potential risk areas including the building water supply system, hot water loop system, fire, and building humidification system. CDC guidance referenced in the report stated that a written description of building water systems and a process flow diagram should be developed, including details such as where the building connects to the municipal water supply and where water heaters or boilers are located. The facility did not provide the required building assessment during survey review. R4 was admitted with diagnoses including stage 4 pressure ulcer of the right buttock, osteomyelitis of the vertebra and sacral/sacrococcygeal region, and carrier of other infectious diseases. R4’s MDS showed a BIMS score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition, and the care plan identified a chronic wound and use of enhanced barrier precautions. During observation of wound care, an LPN wore a gown and gloves for the dressing change, then removed the PPE before asking a CNA to assist with repositioning. The CNA sanitized hands and applied gloves, but neither the LPN nor the CNA wore a gown during repositioning. Both the LPN, CNA, and DON confirmed that gown and gloves should have been worn during direct care, including repositioning.
Failure to Report Alleged Neglect During Unsafe Van Transport
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report an allegation of neglect to the State Agency (SA) as required by its Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition policy. The policy states that all villagers have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property, and that the facility reports all allegations and substantiated incidents of villager rights violations to all required agencies. On the evening of 3/13/26, the Program Manager and DON were informed of an incident during transport in which the van driver did not secure a resident’s wheelchair with tie-downs or a seatbelt, and the van made an abrupt stop, causing the resident to slide forward in the wheelchair. Despite this, the Program Manager and DON decided the incident was not reportable to the SA and did not consider it an allegation of neglect. The resident involved had multiple medical diagnoses, including type 2 diabetes, olecranon bursitis of the right elbow, discitis, infection and inflammatory reaction due to an internal left knee prosthesis, collapsed thoracic vertebra, sequela of fracture, and paraplegia, and had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15/15. An incident note documented that after tipping or sliding in the chair during transport back to the facility, the resident reported stiffness in the lower back and lower extremities, rib soreness, and right knee redness with red patches above the knee that appeared to be burst blood vessels from the incident. A physician progress note later recorded that the resident fell forward and hit their feet, with reported stiffness, soreness, and bruising above the right knee. Despite these documented complaints and findings, the facility leadership concluded there was no acute injury at the time and did not report the event as an allegation of neglect to the SA.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Allegation of Neglect After Unsafe Van Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect involving one resident following a van transport incident. The resident, who had intact cognition and multiple medical conditions including type 2 diabetes, vertebral collapse, discitis, prosthetic knee infection, and paraplegia, reported that the van driver did not use a seatbelt or tie-downs to secure the wheelchair during transport. During an abrupt stop, the resident slid in the wheelchair and subsequently reported stiffness in the lower back and lower extremities, rib pain, and right knee redness with red patches above the knee that appeared to be burst blood vessels from contact during the incident. A physician later documented that the resident fell forward and hit their feet, with bruising above the right knee. Despite the facility’s Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition policy requiring thorough investigation of all villager-related incidents and allegations of rights violations, the facility did not interview the resident or the van driver until three days after the incident. The investigation lacked a documented statement of the van driver’s account, even though an internal email indicated the driver admitted not securing the wheelchair. The facility did not monitor the resident’s right knee bruise, did not complete pain assessments for the reported rib, back, and lower extremity pain, and did not document ongoing assessment of the reported discomfort. Additionally, the facility did not interview other residents who used the van to determine if similar events had occurred and did not provide or document staff education for other van drivers on safe transportation or abuse/neglect policies as part of the investigation into this allegation of neglect.
Unsafe Van Transport Without Required Wheelchair Restraints and Seat Belt
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and to provide adequate supervision and safety measures during van transportation. Facility policy required that staff and residents always use seat belts, that the wheelchair restraint system always be used for residents in wheelchairs, and that transportation not be provided if a resident refused safety equipment. Despite this, the van driver transported a resident in a wheelchair without applying wheelchair tie-downs or a seat belt, and the resident had a known history of refusing seat belts. The driver reported being told during training not to use the seat belt because the resident would refuse. The resident involved had multiple medical diagnoses, including type 2 diabetes, olecranon bursitis of the right elbow, discitis, infection and inflammatory reaction due to an internal left knee prosthesis, collapsed thoracic vertebra, sequela of fracture, and paraplegia. The resident’s MDS showed intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15/15. The resident reported being transported frequently in the facility’s van, routinely secured with wheelchair tie-downs but not wearing a seat belt due to refusal. On the date of the incident, the resident stated that the van driver did not secure the wheelchair with tie-downs and the resident was not wearing a seat belt when the driver made an abrupt stop, causing the resident to slide in the wheelchair, strike a toolbox on the floor, and injure the right knee and toes. Following the incident, nursing documentation indicated the resident reported stiffness in the lower back and lower extremities, soreness in the ribs, and redness and bruising above the right knee, which the nurse attributed to contact during the incident. A physician progress note later documented that the resident fell forward when the van came to a sudden stop, resulting in stiffness, soreness, and bruising above the right knee. The van driver acknowledged feeling uncomfortable transporting residents, confirmed that the resident was not secured with a seat belt or wheelchair tie-downs, and stated that the driver had to physically reposition the resident in the wheelchair despite policy that non-certified staff should not lift or transfer residents. The driver also reported limited training prior to independently transporting residents and reliance on a chart to figure out wheelchair tie-downs, with no documented skills demonstration or verification of understanding of transportation policies.
Bedside Medications Kept Without Authorization
Penalty
Summary
Pharmaceutical services did not meet the needs of 2 residents because medications were found at the bedside without a self-administration assessment or physician order authorizing bedside storage. R138, who was admitted with a diagnosis of closed right femur fracture and had a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, was observed with liquid berry-flavored melatonin 10 mg on the bedside table. R138 stated the melatonin helped with sleep and that it had been taken a few times since admission. The medical record did not contain a self-administration assessment or an order for melatonin, and the care plan did not indicate sleeplessness or a need for medication for sleep. R143, who was admitted with pneumonia and had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, was observed with four 21 mg nicotine patches, an Incruse Ellipta dry powder inhaler, and a Breo Ellipta dry powder inhaler at the bedside. R143 stated the medications were from home, had been at the bedside since admission, and were not being used because nurses provided medications. The medical record did not contain a self-administration assessment, and the orders present did not authorize bedside storage. RN-F, RN-G, and the DON confirmed the medications should not have been kept at the bedside without an order and that a self-administration assessment should have been completed.
Failure to Maintain Accessible Call Light Leads to Resident Fall and Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one resident at risk for falls. The resident was admitted with a left humerus fracture, weakness, and pain, and an admission fall risk assessment identified the resident as being at risk for falls. The care plan noted a potential for falls due to a history of falls and a recent left shoulder fracture and included an intervention to ensure the resident’s call light was within reach. On the night prior to the fall, a CNA assisted the resident to the bathroom and then into a recliner. The CNA left the room call light secured to the bed, approximately four feet from the recliner and out of the resident’s reach, and did not place the resident’s wrist call light on the resident. The resident had intact cognition and was known to consistently use the call light and had not self-transferred previously during the stay. At approximately 6:00 AM, the resident self-transferred to the bathroom without assistance, resulting in an unwitnessed fall in the room. Staff became aware of the fall after a family member called the facility, having been texted by the resident that help was needed. When the RN assessed the resident, the resident was found on the floor with pain in the left arm, the room call light clipped to the bed and out of reach, and the wrist call light in the nightstand. Hospital evaluation following the fall revealed a worsened comminuted fracture of the left humerus, an acute to subacute L1 compression fracture, and a scalp hematoma, and the resident later underwent surgery for the left humerus fracture.
Failure to Honor Resident Grievance Rights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Additionally, the facility did not establish a grievance policy or make prompt efforts to resolve grievances as required. This deficiency was identified based on the facility's lack of appropriate procedures and actions to address and resolve resident grievances in a timely and non-discriminatory manner.
Failure to Provide Interpreter Services for Spanish-Speaking Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, whose primary language is Spanish, was fully informed and able to participate in medical treatment and decisions in a language they could understand. The resident, who was responsible for their own healthcare decisions, expressed a preference for interpreter services to communicate medical treatment needs. However, these services were not consistently provided, and the resident's care plan did not address the language barrier. The resident's medical record indicated a preference for Spanish and the use of an interpreter, but the care plan failed to include this information. Social Services progress notes documented the need for an interpreter, yet communication with the resident often relied on family members or gestures. The resident reported difficulty in communicating needs, such as requesting medication for itchiness, and was not informed on how to request an interpreter. Interviews with staff revealed that while interpreter services were available, they were not consistently utilized. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the resident's care plan did not address the language barrier, and staff often relied on simple questions or the resident's daughter for translation. The resident's inability to communicate effectively led to unmet needs and misunderstandings, such as receiving disliked food items.
Failure to Ensure Call Lights Within Reach for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach for three residents, leading to a deficiency in accommodating the needs and preferences of these residents. Resident 83, who had moderately impaired cognition and bilateral hand contractures, was observed multiple times without a call light within reach. Despite the resident's inability to reach or use the call light, no alternative notification device was provided. Staff acknowledged the oversight but did not implement a solution to ensure the resident could call for assistance. Similarly, Resident 80, who was severely cognitively impaired and unable to mobilize independently, was found without a call light within reach while seated in a Broda chair. Although the resident could press the call light when it was placed in their lap, staff had not considered alternative call light options. Resident 93, with moderate cognitive impairment and a care plan indicating the need for a call light within reach, was also observed without access to a call light. Staff confirmed the oversight and repositioned the call light, but no systemic solution was in place to prevent recurrence.
Failure to Notify Physician of Resident's Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a physician of a change in condition for a resident, identified as R56, in a timely manner. R56, who had a history of urinary tract infection, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia, type 2 diabetes, and erythema intertrigo, was admitted to the facility with moderate cognitive impairment. On November 26, 2024, nursing staff identified two small skin shearing areas on R56's coccyx, which were initially assessed as moisture-associated skin damage due to incontinence. Preventative measures, including barrier cream and repositioning, were implemented, but the physician was not informed of the wounds until December 2, 2024, when they were diagnosed as unstageable pressure injuries. Interviews with facility staff, including a wound care certified RN and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the physician should have been notified immediately upon discovery of the wounds on November 26, 2024. The facility's policy on Notification of Change in Condition/Treatment requires significant changes in a resident's status to be reported to the physician promptly, which was not adhered to in this case. This delay in communication represents a deficiency in the facility's adherence to its own policies and procedures regarding timely notification of changes in a resident's condition.
Failure to Provide Adequate Oxygen Therapy Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment for a resident requiring oxygen therapy. The resident, who had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, dementia, and pneumonia, had a physician order for 2-6 liters per minute of oxygen via nasal cannula. However, the resident's medical record did not include a care plan for oxygen use, which is a critical component of managing their respiratory needs. Additionally, the facility's policy required that nasal cannula and oxygen tubing be changed when a resident had a recent respiratory infection, but there was no documentation indicating that the resident's tubing was changed after being diagnosed with pneumonia. Observations and interviews conducted by the surveyor revealed that the resident was using oxygen at 2 liters per minute, but the staff could not verify when the oxygen tubing was last changed. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the resident should have had a care plan for oxygen therapy and that the oxygen tubing should be changed every 7 days and after a respiratory infection. This lack of adherence to the facility's policy and the absence of a care plan for oxygen therapy contributed to the deficiency identified during the survey.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Dialysis Care and Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate dialysis care and services for a resident, identified as R99, who required such services. R99, who was admitted with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis, did not have a dialysis care plan in place. The facility's Dialysis Coordination policy required monitoring of dialysis access sites and initiation of a hemodialysis care plan, which was not done for R99. The resident's care plan, dated 7/16/24, did not include any mention of dialysis or the presence of a right arm fistula, which is critical for dialysis treatment. Interviews with R99 and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that facility staff did not consistently assist R99 with personal hygiene before dialysis appointments, and they were unaware of the need to avoid checking blood pressure on the arm with the fistula. R99 reported that dialysis staff monitored the fistula, but facility staff did not. The DON acknowledged that the care plan should have included dialysis and fistula monitoring, and that CNAs should be aware of dialysis appointments and the need to avoid using the right arm for blood pressure checks.
Failure to Conduct Self-Administration Assessment for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of a resident, identified as R99, who was observed with a tube of 1% hydrocortisone cream stored under their refrigerator. The facility's policy on self-administration of medications requires an assessment by the Interdisciplinary Team to determine if a resident can safely self-administer medication and ensure safe storage. However, R99's medical record did not contain any such assessment, indicating a lapse in following the facility's policy. R99, who was admitted with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis, had a BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment and was responsible for their medical decision-making. During an interview, R99 and their daughter indicated that the daughter applied the cream during visits. The Director of Nursing confirmed that no self-administration assessment had been conducted for R99, and therefore, medications should not have been present in the resident's room.
Failure to Monitor Psychotropic Medication Side Effects
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for a resident prescribed psychotropic medications, which included diazepam, quetiapine fumarate, and mirtazapine. The resident, who had a history of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, insomnia, bipolar disorder, and severe unspecified dementia with agitation, was not monitored for adverse reactions to these medications. The facility's policy required that residents receiving psychotropic medications be monitored to evaluate the effectiveness and potential side effects of the medications, but this was not documented in the resident's medical record. During the survey, it was found that the resident's medical record, Medication Administration Record (MAR), and care plan lacked any documentation of monitoring interventions for adverse reactions to the psychotropic medications. Interviews with the Registered Nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of such monitoring interventions in the resident's medical record, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's psychotropic drug monitoring policy.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies observed during a survey. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C did not follow proper hand hygiene and glove-changing protocols while providing incontinence care to a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of urinary tract infections. CNA-C used the same gloves to clean the resident's buttocks and apply barrier cream, then donned a clean glove without sanitizing the hand, compromising infection control measures. Another deficiency was noted with a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to a urostomy. CNAs M and N failed to wear the required gowns and gloves while repositioning the resident, despite the presence of an EBP sign on the door. The Director of Nursing confirmed that repositioning is considered high-contact care, and EBP should be used for residents with indwelling devices or wounds, which was not adhered to in this case. Additionally, a resident diagnosed with pneumonia and exhibiting symptoms such as coughing up phlegm was not placed on droplet precautions as required. The resident was initially on contact precautions, but these were removed despite ongoing symptoms. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that droplet precautions should have been implemented given the resident's condition and symptoms, highlighting a lapse in following appropriate transmission-based precautions.
Failure to Offer PCV20 Vaccine to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents, identified as R80 and R36, were offered the PCV20 vaccine as recommended by the CDC guidelines. R80, who was admitted with Alzheimer's dementia and had severely impaired cognition, had previously declined the PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccines in 2021. However, there was no documentation in R80's medical record indicating that the PCV20 vaccine was offered or administered. Similarly, R36, also diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia and having moderately impaired cognition, had received the PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccines in the past but was not offered the PCV20 vaccine as per the CDC's updated recommendations. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed during an interview that both residents were not offered the PCV20 vaccine, acknowledging that it should have been provided according to the CDC guidelines. This oversight in offering the PCV20 vaccine to residents who had either declined previous vaccines or had received earlier versions without completing the updated vaccination schedule led to the deficiency noted by the surveyors.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 109 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Appleton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rennes Health And Rehab Center-appleton | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Meadowbrook At Appleton | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Edenbrook Of Appleton North | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 1 |
| Peabody Manor | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Oakridge Gardens Nur Ctr, Inc | 3.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Brewster Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.