Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Westminster-canterbury Of Lynchburg Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident’s admission MDS incorrectly coded Section N to show antibiotic use when the resident was actually receiving Hiprex (methenamine hippurate) for UTI prophylaxis, which is not an antibiotic. The resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, and the MDS coordinator acknowledged the miscoding during interview.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and edema and another resident with CHF and other cardiac and neurologic diagnoses did not receive ordered compression therapy to both lower extremities, even though the TARs were coded as completed. Observations showed TED hose and TubiGrips were not visible on either resident, and a CNA stated one resident did not wear TubiGrips. The provider orders directed morning application and bedtime removal, and both care plans included the compression devices as ordered.
Inaccurate MDS Medication Coding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS assessment for 1 of 25 residents, Resident #2. The admission MDS with an ARD of 01/15/26 coded Section N to show the resident was taking an antibiotic, but the clinical record showed the resident had a provider order for Hiprex (Methenamine Hippurate) 1 gram by mouth twice daily for UTI prophylaxis. Resident #2’s diagnoses included genital tract fistulae and anxiety disorder, and Section C of the MDS included a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During interview, the MDS coordinator stated the antibiotic use had been miscoded on the MDS and that a correction had been completed. The issue was reviewed with the Administrator, DON, MDS Coordinator, and Nurse Supervisors during the end-of-day meeting, and no further information was provided before the exit conference.
Failure to Apply Ordered Compression Devices
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow provider orders for two residents by not applying ordered compression devices to both lower extremities, while documenting that the treatments had been completed. Resident #5 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, osteoarthritis, lymphedema, and edema, and the most recent MDS showed a BIMS score of 3 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On observation, bilateral TED hose were not visible on the resident's lower extremities, yet the March 2026 TAR was coded to show the TED hose had been applied. The provider order, started 11/12/25, directed TED hose to both lower extremities in the morning and off at bedtime for edema, and the resident's care plan included TED hose as ordered. Resident #8 had diagnoses including acute on chronic congestive heart failure, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, chronic pulmonary embolism, and atrial fibrillation, and the most recent MDS showed a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, indicating cognitive intactness. On observation, bilateral TubiGrips were not visible on the resident's lower extremities, and CNA #1 stated the resident did not wear TubiGrips. The provider order, started 11/19/25, directed TubiGrips to both lower extremities for prevention in the morning and removal at bedtime, but the March 2026 TAR was coded to show the TubiGrips had been applied. The resident's care plan also included Tubi-grip as ordered.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 36 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lynchburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seven Hills Rehabilitation And Nursing | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 1 |
| Tate Springs Health & Rehab | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Forest Health & Rehab Center | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Guggenheimer Health And Rehab Center | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Westminster-canterbury Of Lynchburg Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.