Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pine View Transitional Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions reported that a nurse yelled at him after a prolonged wait for assistance, but the facility did not immediately report the allegation of verbal abuse to the State Survey Agency. The incident was not documented in the medical record, and leadership did not initiate a formal investigation or report until prompted by a surveyor, resulting in a deficiency for failure to follow required reporting procedures.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions reported that a nurse yelled at him after he waited a prolonged period for assistance. The incident was not documented in the medical record, and no abuse or neglect investigation was initiated by the DON or AIT, nor was it reported to the State Survey Agency. A grievance was only completed after surveyor inquiry, and facility leadership initially minimized the event, resulting in a failure to respond appropriately to the alleged violation.
A resident with limited mobility and chronic conditions was not provided with an assistive device for bed mobility despite repeated requests, due to facility policy classifying such devices as restraints. The resident resorted to using unstable objects like a nightstand drawer and walker for support, while staff acknowledged these makeshift solutions but did not escalate the issue. Facility leadership maintained a restraint-free policy, resulting in the resident's needs and preferences not being accommodated.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Verbal Abuse to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse or neglect to the State Survey Agency after a resident reported that a nurse yelled at him during a delayed response to his call light. The resident, who had multiple medical conditions including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic wounds, osteomyelitis, and a lumbar vertebra fracture, stated that he waited for nearly an hour for assistance, became anxious, and began yelling for help. When a nurse finally entered, she reportedly yelled at the resident in a gruff tone, which the resident found distressing. The resident communicated his concerns to management, expressing that he felt uncared for and upset by the staff's response. Upon review, there was no documentation of the incident in the resident's medical record. Interviews with facility leadership revealed that the DON was aware of the complaint and conducted an informal investigation, speaking with both the nurse and the resident. The DON determined, based on the nurse's account, that the incident did not constitute abuse and did not follow up further with the resident. The AIT, who was responsible for reporting abuse allegations, was not fully aware of the details and did not report the incident to the State Survey Agency or document an investigation at the time. A grievance form was only initiated after the surveyor inquired about the incident, and the facility's policy defined verbal abuse as including yelling with intent to intimidate. The facility's leadership acknowledged that the event should have been investigated and potentially reported, but no immediate report or formal investigation was made until prompted by the survey process. This failure to report the allegation of abuse or neglect in a timely manner constituted the deficiency.
Failure to Investigate Alleged Verbal Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse or neglect involving a resident who reported that a nurse yelled at him after he waited for an extended period for assistance. The resident, who had multiple medical conditions including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic wounds, osteomyelitis, and a lumbar vertebra fracture, stated that he waited nearly an hour for help, used his call light, and eventually began yelling to get staff attention. When a nurse entered, she reportedly yelled at the resident in a gruff tone, which the resident found distressing. The resident communicated his concerns to management, expressing that he felt uncared for and upset by the staff's response. Despite the resident's report, there was no documentation of the incident in his medical record, and the facility did not initiate an abuse or neglect investigation at the time. Interviews with the DON and AIT revealed that while the DON was aware of the complaint and spoke with the nurse involved, she did not follow up with the resident after the initial interview and did not document an investigation. The AIT, responsible for investigating abuse allegations, was unaware of the full extent of the complaint and did not report or document the incident as required. The incident was not reported to the State Survey Agency, and no formal investigation was conducted until prompted by the surveyor's inquiry. A grievance form regarding the incident was only completed after the surveyor asked about the event, and the facility's policy defined verbal abuse as including yelling with the intent to intimidate. However, the initial response from facility leadership was to minimize the incident, with the RDO suggesting it may have been a misunderstanding and not meeting the threshold for verbal abuse. The lack of timely and thorough investigation, documentation, and reporting constituted a failure to respond appropriately to an alleged violation.
Failure to Provide Assistive Device for Bed Mobility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of a resident who required assistive devices for bed mobility. The resident, who had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic wounds, and a lumbar vertebra fracture, reported having previously used a bed rail at another facility to assist with repositioning. Despite multiple requests to CNAs, nurses, and therapy staff for a similar device, the resident was informed that such devices were not allowed due to facility policy. The resident expressed that having a positioning bar would help with bed mobility and make him feel more secure, especially when staff were not always available in pairs to assist with changing his brief. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident attempted to use alternative objects, such as the nightstand drawer and his walker, to aid in repositioning, but these were unstable and potentially unsafe. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident required moderate to extensive assistance with bed mobility and that he often held onto the nightstand drawer or walker for support. Some staff acknowledged that a positioning device might be helpful, but none had notified therapy or nursing about the resident's use of these makeshift supports. The care plan indicated a goal to increase the resident's strength and independence, with approaches to encourage participation in ADLs, but did not address the specific need for an assistive device for bed mobility. Facility leadership, including the DON and Director of Rehab, stated that the facility was restraint-free per corporate policy and that devices such as bed canes or side rails were considered restraints and therefore not permitted. While a trapeze was available for some residents, it was not deemed helpful for side-to-side movement, and the resident had declined its use. The facility's policy and lack of individualized assessment for the requested device resulted in the resident not receiving reasonable accommodation for his bed mobility needs.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 85 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near South Ogden
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mountain View Health Services | 0.3 mi | — | 14 | 1 |
| South Ogden Post-acute (cascades At South Ogden) | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| The Terrace Transitional | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Mt Ogden Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Stonehenge Of Ogden | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pine View Transitional Rehab.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.