Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Mt. Olympus Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Resident choice was not honored when three residents who were documented as able to smoke or vape safely were still placed on supervised smoking with fixed times. One resident with intact cognition and safe smoking behaviors, another resident with stroke-related weakness but observed safe smoking, and a third resident with intact cognition and an incomplete smoking evaluation were all restricted by a facility-wide supervised smoking policy despite staff acknowledging they could smoke safely on their own. In addition, a resident with psychiatric diagnoses asked to stop olanzapine because of weight gain and pain, but the medication change was not completed as ordered at the time.
Incomplete and inaccurate resident records were found for three residents. One resident’s psychotropic medication notes were entered late and did not match the timing of the physician visit and medication changes, another resident’s wander guard checks were inconsistently documented on the MAR despite the device being observed in place, and a third resident’s Lyrica documentation included late entries and conflicting information about the medication order and administration.
The facility failed to maintain documentation for 4 staff members regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Record review showed no evidence that the staff were educated on the vaccine’s benefits and risks, offered the vaccine or information on how to obtain it, or had their vaccination status documented for CDC NHSN reporting. The DON stated the COVID-19 immunization was offered to all staff during flu season, but it was not documented.
Failure to document informed consent for Olanzapine. A resident with multiple psychiatric diagnoses had an order for OLANZapine 10 mg at bedtime, but the medical record contained no consent form. The DON stated there was no documentation that the resident was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the medication or of treatment alternatives.
A resident with MDD with psychotic symptoms, unspecified psychosis, delusional disorders, anxiety, and PTSD asked to be taken off Olanzapine because of weight gain and increased pain, but the medication was only reduced and then continued for weeks. The record showed an unsigned 7.5 mg order, a psychotropic note describing a taper schedule that was not an actual order, and staff interviews confirmed the resident’s request to stop the medication had not been carried out as documented until the medication was later discontinued.
A resident with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, bacteremia, MRSA infection, type 1 DM, and psychoactive substance abuse was assessed as needing assisted smoking and supervision while smoking. His care plan stated he would not smoke without supervision and that tobacco supplies were stored in the smoking box, yet surveyors observed a nicotine vape in his possession during an interview. An LPN said vaping was not allowed in the building and should be stored with smoking supplies, and the DON was unaware the resident had the vape.
Failure to document required provider visits. A resident with multiple serious diagnoses, including metabolic encephalopathy, vertebral osteomyelitis, pressure ulcers, MI, and chronic respiratory failure, had provider visits documented only on two dates after readmission, with no April visit note found in the record. The DON stated she was unsure of the required visit schedule, said the MD tracked visits, and could not provide the missing note even though she said the MD had it.
A resident with Alzheimer's disease and severe dementia with psychotic disturbance consented to receive the pneumococcal vaccine, but the medical record contained no documentation that it was administered. The DON confirmed the resident did not receive his immunizations.
A resident with multiple medical conditions was fatally injured after being transferred with a Hoyer lift using a transfer sheet instead of an approved Hoyer sling. Two CNAs used the sheet that arrived with the resident, despite warnings from the transport driver and without verifying its compatibility. The straps broke during the transfer, causing the resident to fall. Staff interviews revealed a lack of proper training and inconsistent enforcement of equipment policies.
Nursing staff lacked proper training and competency in the use of Hoyer lifts and slings, leading to a fatal incident where a resident was transferred using a transfer sheet instead of an approved lift sling. The transfer sheet's straps broke during the lift, causing the resident to fall and subsequently die. Staff interviews revealed confusion about equipment use and inadequate training, with some CNAs admitting to using transfer sheets with lifts and not being updated on current policies.
A facility failed to notify the Ombudsman when a resident with complex medical conditions was transferred to the hospital for Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure. The Resident Advocate was unaware of the requirement to inform the Ombudsman of such transfers.
Four residents with cognitive impairments eloped from a facility due to inadequate supervision and improper use of wanderguards without physician orders. Despite being identified as high-risk for wandering, the facility failed to implement additional interventions after residents repeatedly removed their wanderguards, leading to multiple elopements.
A registered nurse failed to follow infection control protocols during a medication pass by not performing hand hygiene and handling medications with bare hands. The Director of Nursing confirmed that these actions were against facility expectations, highlighting a need for further education on proper medication administration procedures.
The facility did not develop baseline care plans within 48 hours for two residents, leading to a deficiency. One resident with Parkinson's and dementia, and another with osteoarthritis and diabetes, both lacked timely care plans due to incomplete admission assessments. The DON noted that the nursing administration was responsible for ensuring these plans were completed.
The facility failed to develop and revise care plans for two residents within the required timeframe, leading to repeated elopement incidents. One resident with traumatic brain injury and dementia exhibited wandering behaviors that were not addressed promptly, while another resident with severe cognitive impairment had an outdated care plan despite multiple elopement attempts. The facility lacked documentation of effective interventions and physician orders for wanderguards, as confirmed by staff interviews.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including hypertension, received blood pressure medications outside of the physician's ordered parameters. Despite protocols to hold medication if systolic blood pressure was below 110, records showed administration when levels were lower. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation to follow these parameters, highlighting a failure in adherence.
The facility did not properly label and handle narcotics, as observed in the Quail hallway medication cart where Tramadol 50 mg was improperly taped back into a medication card. An RN and the DON confirmed that narcotics should be wasted by two nurses and documented, not re-taped, to prevent infection and incorrect medication placement.
Resident Choice Restricted for Smoking and Medication Requests
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor resident self-determination by restricting three residents to supervised smoking and designated smoking times even though the records and observations described them as capable of smoking independently. Resident 66 had a Safe Smoking Evaluation stating she could light cigarettes independently, use ashtrays appropriately, hold cigarettes safely, and extinguish them safely, yet she was still placed on assisted supervised smoking. During interview, she said she disliked the smoking schedule and wanted to smoke after breakfast, but was told she could not smoke independently because she had tried to cross the street at the facility; that behavior was not documented on the smoking evaluation. She was later observed smoking in her wheelchair, lighting and smoking her own cigarette without assistance during a supervised session. Resident 32, who had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis after cerebral infarction, history of falls, muscle weakness, chronic pain syndrome, and acquired absence of the left foot, was also restricted to supervised smoking based on the facility’s smoking policy. His Safe Smoking Evaluation showed intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15 and documented independent and safe smoking behaviors, including lighting cigarettes safely, using an ashtray appropriately, and following smoking area rules. Despite this, the evaluation totaled 3 points because of his stroke history and wheelchair use, which triggered assisted smoking. Interviews with staff described him as alert, oriented, able to smoke safely on his own, and able to sign himself out and leave the facility independently. He was observed smoking safely, holding and ashing his cigarette appropriately, and he stated he could light his own cigarette if staff allowed him. Resident 6, who had diagnoses including major depressive disorder, psychosis, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, PTSD, and nicotine dependence, was also restricted to supervised vaping and designated vaping times. Her record showed intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15, and she told staff she felt safe alone, was independent with walking and showering, and wanted to vape on her own because the scheduled times did not fit her routine. The facility’s smoking evaluation for her was incomplete, with smoking observation not completed, yet it still concluded she required assisted smoking. In addition, Resident 6 asked to be taken off olanzapine because of weight gain and worsening pain, but the medication change was not carried out as ordered at the time; the record showed a taper note without a corresponding signed order, later dose changes, and staff interviews confirmed the documentation and order process for the olanzapine changes was inconsistent.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Medical Record Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for 3 sampled residents. For one resident with major depressive disorder, psychosis, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, and PTSD, physician progress notes related to olanzapine were entered as late entries, and the Director of Nursing stated the documentation did not match the actual timing of the physician’s visit and medication decisions. The record reflected a taper plan and later a continued dose, while the DON stated the physician had given a verbal order and that the late note was intended to clarify the medication plan after the fact. For another resident with Alzheimer’s disease and severe dementia with psychotic disturbance, the physician ordered a wander guard to the left wrist with checks each shift. The MAR documented a “y” for some shifts and then a dash for many subsequent shifts, even though the resident was observed wearing the wander guard on the day of observation. The RN interviewed stated he believed the resident was supposed to be wearing the device and that nurses verified placement by visualizing it, but he did not know why the dash was being used. The DON reviewed the MAR and stated the negative sign documentation was concerning and that she would look into it. For a third resident with brain disorder, alcohol dependence, alcoholic polyneuropathy, and seizure-related diagnoses, the resident stated he had not received Lyrica for a couple of weeks because staff told him the order had run out. The record showed a 30-day Lyrica order, a MAR documenting administration through the end of May, and a physician progress note entered later that referenced a visit date in early May and Lyrica use, which the DON said was based on what the resident should have been on. A nurse’s late-entry note about a new NP order for Lyrica 100 mg twice daily was also not found in the medical record when progress notes were reviewed, and the DON stated she needed to call the physician because the note included medications the resident was not on.
Missing Documentation for Staff COVID-19 Vaccination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination for 4 staff members identified as Staff 1, 2, 3, and 4. Record review showed there was no documentation that these staff members were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, offered the vaccine or information on how to obtain it, or had their COVID-19 vaccination status documented as required by CDC NHSN reporting. During the record review, the employee files for these staff members did not show that immunizations had been offered or administered. In interview, the DON stated that the COVID-19 immunization was offered to all staff during flu season but was not documented.
Failure to Document Informed Consent for Olanzapine
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment alternatives, or treatment options and was able to choose the preferred option. Resident 6 was admitted with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms; unspecified psychosis; delusional disorders; anxiety disorder; and post-traumatic stress disorder. The resident had a physician's order for OLANZapine 10 mg by mouth at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder, but the medical record contained no consent form for Olanzapine. During an interview, the DON stated there was no documentation that Resident 6 was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of Olanzapine or of treatment alternatives.
Failure to Honor Resident Request to Taper Off Olanzapine
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident’s choices when Olanzapine was not tapered off as requested. The resident, who had diagnoses including major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, unspecified psychosis, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, and PTSD, told the surveyor that she had asked weeks earlier to be taken off Olanzapine because it caused weight gain of 10-15 pounds and worsened pain related to scoliosis and prior neck surgeries. She stated that she had also spoken with the MD and RN about stopping or changing the medication, but only a dose reduction had occurred. The record showed physician orders for Olanzapine 10 mg at bedtime beginning 5/1/26 and a later order for 7.5 mg at bedtime on 5/14/26, but there was no documentation that the 7.5 mg order was signed by the provider. A psychotropic note dated 5/20/26 documented a taper schedule to discontinue Olanzapine, but the DON stated this taper note was not an order. The MAR showed the resident continued receiving Olanzapine 7.5 mg through 6/22/26. The physician progress note on 6/23/26 documented that Olanzapine was discontinued after the resident was seen in person for follow-up and medication changes were discussed. RN and DON interviews indicated the resident had requested to stop or taper the medication earlier, but the taper off did not occur as documented in the psychotropic note, and the DON stated the NP had given a verbal order to decrease the dose rather than taper it off.
Resident Found With Vape Despite Supervised Smoking Plan
Penalty
Summary
A resident assessed as requiring supervision while smoking was found to have a nicotine vape in his possession during an interview with surveyors. The resident had been admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of the lumbar vertebrae, bacteremia, MRSA infection, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications, and other psychoactive substance abuse with psychoactive substance-induced mood disorder. His record showed that a Safe Smoking Evaluation completed on admission determined he smoked 1 pack of traditional cigarettes per day and met criteria for assisted smoking. The resident’s care plan documented that he smoked cigarettes, would not smoke without supervision through the next review date, required supervision while smoking, and that his tobacco supplies were stored in the smoking box. Despite this, the vape was observed laying on his chest during the survey interview. An LPN stated that residents were not allowed to vape in the building and that vapes should be stored in the locked box with other smoking supplies. The DON stated that residents were not allowed to vape inside the building and was not aware that the resident had a vape in his possession.
Failure to Document Required Provider Visits
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 4 was seen face-to-face by a physician or other provider at the required intervals after readmission. Resident 4 was initially admitted and later readmitted with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, osteomyelitis of the vertebra, streptococcus group A, pressure ulcers of the sacral region and right buttock, myocardial infarction, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the medical record showed provider visits documented on 3/23/26 and 5/26/26, but documentation for an April 2026 physician visit was not found in the record. During interviews on 6/29/26, the DON stated she was unsure how often providers were supposed to see residents, said the providers tracked who needed to be seen, and later stated the MD told her residents were to be seen on admission, at 30 days, and again at 60 days, and that visits could be completed by either the physician or NP. The DON also stated she was unsure whether Resident 4 had been seen on the expected day and that the MD had the April visit note, but she could not provide it and it was not in Resident 4's medical record.
Failure to Provide Ordered Pneumococcal Immunization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that each resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or had documentation of a medical contraindication or refusal. Resident 10, who was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and severe dementia with psychotic disturbance, had an Immunization Consent dated 3/4/26 indicating consent for the pneumococcal vaccine to be administered on 3/10/26. However, review of the medical record from 6/22/26 through 6/29/26 found no documentation that the pneumococcal vaccine was actually given. During an interview on 6/29/26 at 2:54 PM, the DON stated that Resident 10 did not receive his immunizations.
Resident Death Following Use of Inappropriate Transfer Device with Hoyer Lift
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was transferred using a Hoyer lift with a transfer sheet rather than an approved Hoyer sling, resulting in the resident being dropped and subsequently dying. The resident, who had recently been admitted with diagnoses including acute gastric ulcer with hemorrhage, unspecified diastolic heart failure, and morbid obesity, arrived at the facility on a stretcher with a transfer sheet underneath her. Two CNAs decided to use the transfer sheet already under the resident for the Hoyer lift transfer, despite it not being an approved or compatible sling for the lift. During the transfer, the straps of the transfer sheet snapped, causing the resident to fall onto the legs of the Hoyer lift. Immediate attempts at resuscitation were made, but the resident was pronounced deceased after EMS arrived and identified a DNR order. Interviews with staff revealed that the CNAs were familiar with using transfer sheets in place of Hoyer slings and had done so previously without incident. The CNAs did not verify whether the sling was approved for use with the Hoyer lift, and one CNA stated that she had used similar transfer slings in the past. The LPN on duty was not present in the room during the transfer but responded after hearing a yell and a thud, finding the resident on the floor. The transport driver who brought the resident to the facility expressed concern about using the transfer sheet for the Hoyer lift and advised against it, but the CNAs proceeded regardless. Further investigation found that staff training on the proper use of Hoyer lifts and slings was lacking, with some CNAs reporting they had not received hands-on training since their initial orientation. Facility policy regarding the exclusive use of facility-owned and approved slings was not consistently communicated or enforced among staff. Observations also indicated that Hoyer slings and transfer equipment were stored in a manner that could lead to confusion about which items were appropriate for use with the mechanical lift.
Failure to Ensure Competent Use of Mechanical Lifts and Slings Resulting in Resident Death
Penalty
Summary
Nursing staff at the facility did not possess the necessary competencies and skills to safely use mechanical lifts and slings for resident transfers, as evidenced by direct observations, interviews, and record reviews. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were not adequately educated on the correct use of Hoyer lifts, the identification and use of approved Hoyer slings, or how to distinguish transfer sheets from lift slings. Multiple staff members reported either never receiving hands-on training or only having received training many years prior, with some staff indicating they had not been updated on new policies or equipment. A critical incident occurred when a newly admitted resident, who had significant medical conditions including acute gastric ulcer with hemorrhage, congestive heart failure, and morbid obesity, was transferred from another facility. The resident arrived on a stretcher with a blue transfer sheet underneath her. CNAs at the receiving facility used the transfer sheet, mistaking it for a Hoyer lift sling, to transfer the resident using a mechanical lift. Despite warnings from the transport driver that the sheet was not intended for use with a lift, the CNAs proceeded. During the transfer, the straps of the transfer sheet broke, causing the resident to fall onto the legs of the Hoyer lift. The resident became unresponsive and was later pronounced deceased. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding regarding the differences between transfer sheets and Hoyer slings, as well as inconsistent practices regarding the use of slings that accompanied residents from other facilities. Some CNAs admitted to routinely using transfer sheets with Hoyer lifts, while others were unclear about the proper procedures or the lifespan of slings. The facility's policy regarding the exclusive use of facility-owned and approved equipment had not been communicated to all staff at the time of the incident.
Failure to Notify Ombudsman of Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding the transfer or discharge of a resident to the hospital. This deficiency was identified for one of the 38 sampled residents, specifically when a resident was discharged to the hospital due to a change in condition. The resident, who had a complex medical history including peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and other conditions, was admitted to the hospital for Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure. During an interview, the Resident Advocate admitted to not notifying the Ombudsman of the transfer, stating a lack of awareness of the requirement to do so.
Inadequate Supervision and Assistance Devices Lead to Multiple Elopements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for four residents, leading to multiple elopements. Resident 120, with a history of traumatic brain injury and moderate cognitive impairment, was placed with a wanderguard without a physician's order or assessment. Despite being identified as a high risk for wandering, the resident eloped twice, once by removing the wanderguard and another time when left unsupervised momentarily by a CNA. The facility did not implement additional interventions after the resident repeatedly removed the wanderguard. Resident 121, diagnosed with traumatic brain injury and vascular dementia, also experienced multiple elopements. The resident's care plan for wandering was developed only after several incidents, despite being identified as having moderate cognitive impairment and wandering behaviors. The facility failed to document other interventions to prevent elopement after the resident removed the wanderguard multiple times, and no physician's order for the wanderguard was found in the medical record. Residents 125 and 127 also faced similar issues with inadequate supervision and lack of proper assessments for wanderguards. Resident 125, with schizoaffective disorder and moderate cognitive impairment, eloped and was later found by local transport. The resident's wanderguard was placed without a physician's order, and no additional interventions were documented. Resident 127, with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering, eloped despite having a wanderguard, which was not ordered by a physician. The facility did not update the care plan or implement other interventions to prevent further elopements.
Infection Control Breach During Medication Pass
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by the actions of a registered nurse (RN) during a medication pass. On the morning of May 8, 2024, RN 2 was observed not performing hand hygiene before starting the medication pass. During the process, RN 2 used her bare fingers to retrieve a medication from a cup, inadvertently touching the medication and the sides of the cup. Despite this, she continued the medication pass without restarting the process for the affected resident. Additionally, RN 2 was seen handling a tablet with her bare fingers, placing it on a pill cutter, and then transferring the cut tablet into a medication cup, which was subsequently administered to a resident. These actions were contrary to the facility's expectations, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON), who stated that hand hygiene should be performed, and medications should not be touched with bare hands. The DON acknowledged that medication pass education was necessary, indicating a gap in adherence to infection control protocols.
Failure to Develop Timely Baseline Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for two residents, resulting in a deficiency. Resident 55, who was initially admitted and later readmitted with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, did not have a baseline care plan developed until seven days after admission. Similarly, Resident 167, admitted with conditions such as right hip osteoarthritis, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and type II diabetes, also lacked a baseline care plan until seven days post-admission. The Director of Nursing (DON) explained that the baseline care plan should be generated from an admission assessment conducted by the admitting nurse. However, for both residents, this assessment was not completed, preventing the creation of the necessary care plans. The DON acknowledged that the nursing administration was responsible for ensuring the completion of these baseline care plans, but the oversight led to the deficiency noted by the surveyors.
Deficient Care Plan Development and Revision for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans for two residents were developed within 7 days after the completion of their comprehensive assessments and were not revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. Resident 121, who was admitted with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and vascular dementia, exhibited wandering and elopement behaviors that were not addressed in a timely manner. Despite multiple incidents of elopement and exit-seeking behavior, a care plan addressing these issues was not developed until several weeks after the initial assessment. The resident's medical record lacked documentation of effective interventions to prevent further elopement, and there was no physician's order for the use of a wanderguard, which the resident frequently removed. Resident 127, admitted with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering, also had an outdated care plan that was not revised despite multiple elopement attempts. The resident's wander risk assessment indicated a high risk of wandering, yet the care plan had not been updated since its initial development. The resident's progress notes documented several instances of exit-seeking behavior, but there was no evidence of additional interventions beyond the use of a wanderguard, which also lacked a physician's order. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing, confirmed the deficiencies in care plan development and revision for both residents. The facility's failure to timely update and implement effective care plans for residents 121 and 127 contributed to repeated elopement incidents, highlighting a significant lapse in addressing the residents' safety and care needs.
Failure to Adhere to Blood Pressure Medication Parameters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs, as evidenced by the administration of blood pressure medications outside of the physician's ordered parameters. Resident 4, who had multiple diagnoses including hypertension, was prescribed Chlorthalidone and Amlodipine with specific instructions to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was less than 110. However, the medication administration records for March, April, and May 2024 showed that these medications were administered on several occasions when the resident's blood pressure was below the specified threshold. Interviews with the facility's staff, including a Registered Nurse and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that there were established blood pressure parameters that were expected to be followed to ensure resident safety. The staff acknowledged that the nurses were supposed to check the blood pressure before administering the medication and hold it if the blood pressure was below the ordered parameters. Despite these protocols, the medications were administered inappropriately, indicating a failure to adhere to the physician's orders and the facility's procedures for medication administration.
Improper Labeling and Handling of Narcotics
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to label all drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, specifically concerning the handling of narcotics. During an observation of the medication cart in the Quail hallway, it was found that a medication card containing Tramadol 50 mg had pockets numbered 10 and 20 taped, with a white tablet in each pocket. An interview with an RN revealed that narcotics are supposed to be wasted by two nurses and documented in the narcotic book, not taped back into the medication card. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the expected procedure is for nurses to waste narcotics with another nurse and sign off in the narcotic book, emphasizing that re-taping medication into cards is not allowed as it could lead to infection and incorrect medication placement.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 184 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Salt Lake City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monument Healthcare Canyon Rim | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Millcreek Rehabilitation And Nursing | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Highland Care Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Spring Creek Healthcare Center | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Monument Healthcare Murray Creek | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Mt. Olympus Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.