Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at St Dominic Village Rehabilitation And Nursing Cent during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively intact resident with multiple medical conditions, including diabetic retinopathy, PTSD, and a lower leg amputation, gave an LVN his debit card and PIN so she could buy him food. The resident later learned from his bank that multiple unauthorized transactions totaling $800 had been made, and he reported that the LVN admitted to using some of his money and agreed to repay it. The LVN acknowledged having the card to purchase items but denied using it without the resident’s knowledge. The Activities Director and Administrator stated that only designated staff, such as the Activities Director, were allowed to purchase items or assist with resident funds, and both were unaware that this LVN was handling the resident’s card, contrary to facility policies prohibiting misappropriation and limiting financial assistance to designated staff.
The facility did not consistently update care plans to reflect new falls and interventions for several residents with significant medical and cognitive impairments. Although staff implemented measures such as low beds, clutter-free areas, and increased rounding after fall incidents, these actions were not documented in the care plans as required by facility policy. Communication about interventions occurred verbally among staff, but formal documentation was lacking.
Three residents experienced abuse when two residents with dementia were involved in a sexual incident without proper assessment of capacity to consent, and another resident with intact cognition reported being physically mistreated by a CNA during incontinence care. The facility lacked policies for determining consent to sexual activity, failed to update care plans after incidents, and did not document prior concerns about staff behavior.
Three residents with cognitive impairment did not have their care plans updated in a timely or accurate manner following significant behavioral incidents, including inappropriate sexual interaction and unprovoked behavioral symptoms. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed delays and omissions in care plan documentation, despite facility policy requiring prompt interdisciplinary updates.
A medication cart was found unlocked and unattended in a hallway, with a resident's Timolol eye drops left on top and multiple drawers containing insulin pens, lancets, syringes, and other medications accessible. An LVN stated she left the cart unsecured while assisting another resident, and the DON confirmed that facility policy requires medication carts to be locked and supervised at all times.
Misappropriation of Resident Funds by Non‑Designated Staff
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a cognitively intact resident from misappropriation of funds by a staff member. The resident, an adult male with diabetic retinopathy, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, PTSD, and a left lower leg amputation, had a BIMS score of 15 on a recent MDS, indicating he was cognitively intact. He reported that he trusted an LVN and gave her his debit card and PIN so she could buy him food. Later, his bank contacted him about a declined $300 payment and informed him that multiple small unauthorized withdrawals totaling $800 had been made from his account. The resident stated that only his son and the LVN had access to his card. After learning of the unauthorized transactions, he contacted his bank to stop the card and issue a new one. He reported that he confronted both his son and the LVN; according to the resident, the LVN admitted to using some of his money and agreed to repay it, which the resident stated she did through installments from her paychecks. The resident did not report the incident to the facility and stated this was the first and only time such an incident had occurred. A banker confirmed that the bank’s call center generated a report of declined transactions of $300, $100, $50, and $200 on the resident’s card, and that the resident said he had not authorized those transactions. The LVN acknowledged that the resident had given her his bank card to purchase items but denied using the card or the resident’s money without his knowledge. The Activities Director, who had long tenure at the facility, stated that she was the only staff member designated to purchase items for residents and that she was unaware of any other staff, including the LVN, doing so. The Administrator similarly stated that residents needing items could ask the Activities Director, that only designated staff should assist with resident funds, and that he had instructed staff not to take residents’ money or cards. He reported being unaware that this resident had a credit card in his possession and that he expected the LVN to direct the resident to the Activities Director and notify him so purchases could be tracked. Facility policies on abuse, neglect, and misappropriation, and on residents’ funds, specified that residents have the right to be free from misappropriation and that only designated staff may assist in managing resident funds.
Failure to Update Care Plans After Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for multiple residents following fall incidents. For four out of five residents reviewed, the care plans were not updated to reflect new falls and the interventions that were put in place. Specifically, after each fall event, interventions such as low beds, clutter-free areas, increased rounding, lab orders, and nighttime snacks were implemented by staff, but these were not documented in the residents' care plans. This lack of documentation was observed despite the facility's policy requiring care plans to be updated after changes in a resident's condition or following incidents such as falls. Residents affected had significant medical histories, including conditions such as stroke, hemiplegia, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, and impaired cognition. These residents were dependent on staff for activities of daily living and were at high risk for falls. In several cases, falls were witnessed or discovered by staff, and immediate interventions were initiated, such as neuro checks and physical assessments. However, the care plans did not reflect the most recent falls or the specific interventions that were implemented in response to those incidents. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON, MDS Coordinator, nurses, and CNAs, revealed that while interventions were communicated verbally during shift changes and through other informal means, the formal care plans were not consistently updated. The MDS Coordinator relied on notifications from the Fall Committee or Unit Managers to update care plans, and if not informed, updates were not made. Staff acknowledged that interventions were being carried out but admitted that documentation in the care plans was lacking. Facility policies reviewed also emphasized the need for interdisciplinary involvement and timely updates to care plans following changes in resident condition, which was not consistently followed.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual and Physical Abuse Due to Lack of Policy and Inadequate Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from sexual and physical abuse, as evidenced by two separate incidents involving three residents. In the first incident, a staff member observed a male resident with moderate cognitive impairment (BIMS scores of 10-11, diagnosed with dementia) with his mouth on the breast of a female resident with severe cognitive impairment (BIMS scores of 6-7, also diagnosed with dementia). The female resident was assessed as lacking the capacity to make informed decisions, and both residents' care plans did not address the incident or any sexual behaviors. Interviews with staff revealed that the care plans should have been updated to reflect the incident, but this was not done. The facility did not have a policy or procedure in place to assess or determine capacity to consent to sexual activity, and there was no documentation or assessment of consent for sexual activity in the residents' records or admission packets. In the second incident, a male resident with intact cognition and total dependence on staff for toileting care reported that a CNA pushed his face into the bed railings during incontinence care. The resident stated he had to yell at the CNA to stop and subsequently requested that she no longer provide care to him. The resident did not sustain injuries or report feeling unsafe, but described the CNA as typically rough and rude. Other residents had previously complained about the CNA's care, and staff interviews confirmed that her demeanor was often perceived as combative or assertive. The facility did not have documentation of prior interventions or conversations with the CNA regarding her care practices. The facility's policies at the time did not address the determination of capacity to consent to sexual activity, nor did they provide guidance on how to assess or document such capacity. Staff interviews indicated a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding updating care plans after behavioral incidents. The facility's abuse and neglect policy did not include procedures for assessing consent to sexual activity, and the admission packet did not address this issue. The absence of these policies and procedures contributed to the failure to protect residents from abuse and to ensure their care plans reflected significant incidents affecting their safety and well-being.
Failure to Timely Update and Accurately Reflect Resident Needs in Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for three residents, as required by regulation. For two residents with dementia and cognitive impairment, an incident involving inappropriate sexual interaction was not documented in their care plans in a timely manner. The incident occurred between a male and a female resident, both of whom had moderate to severe cognitive deficits and required significant assistance with activities of daily living. Despite the incident being reported and discussed among staff and with responsible parties, the care plans for both residents were not updated to reflect the event or to include specific interventions until more than a month later. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that the care plan for a third resident accurately reflected her behavioral symptoms. This resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was bedbound, exhibited behaviors such as yelling without stimulus and fighting the air. However, these behaviors were not consistently documented in her medical record or reflected in her MDS assessment. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the resident's behaviors, leading to an incomplete and potentially inaccurate care plan. The facility's own policy requires an interdisciplinary approach to care planning, ongoing assessment, and timely updates to care plans when residents' conditions change or after significant events such as hospital readmissions. Despite this, the care plans for the affected residents were not promptly or accurately updated following behavioral incidents or changes in condition, as confirmed by staff interviews and record reviews.
Unattended and Unlocked Medication Cart with Accessible Medications
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the Unit 2-B nursing medication cart was left unlocked and unattended in a hallway, with a vial of Timolol eye drops for a resident placed on top of the cart. The drawers of the cart were found to be unlocked and contained various medications and medical supplies, including multiple insulin pens in use for several residents, lancets, pen needles, syringes, topical medications, and other items. The cart was positioned in front of a patient room, with its drawers easily accessible from the hallway. During interviews, the LVN responsible for the cart acknowledged that medications should be stored in locked carts and that the cart must be locked when not under direct supervision. She stated she left the medication on top of the cart and forgot to lock it because she was called away to assist another resident. The DON confirmed that facility policy requires medication carts to be locked and supervised at all times, and that failure to do so could result in unauthorized access to medications or injuries. Review of the facility's policy corroborated these expectations, stating that medication carts must never be left unlocked or unattended, and medications should not be left on top of the cart.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 618 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 63 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Houston
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focused Care At Beechnut | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 1 |
| Avir At Houston | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 2 |
| Continuing Care At Eagles Trace | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| West Houston Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Focused Care At Westwood | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for St Dominic Village Rehabilitation And Nursing Cent.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.