Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Update Care Plans After Falls

Houston, Texas Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for multiple residents following fall incidents. For four out of five residents reviewed, the care plans were not updated to reflect new falls and the interventions that were put in place. Specifically, after each fall event, interventions such as low beds, clutter-free areas, increased rounding, lab orders, and nighttime snacks were implemented by staff, but these were not documented in the residents' care plans. This lack of documentation was observed despite the facility's policy requiring care plans to be updated after changes in a resident's condition or following incidents such as falls. Residents affected had significant medical histories, including conditions such as stroke, hemiplegia, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, and impaired cognition. These residents were dependent on staff for activities of daily living and were at high risk for falls. In several cases, falls were witnessed or discovered by staff, and immediate interventions were initiated, such as neuro checks and physical assessments. However, the care plans did not reflect the most recent falls or the specific interventions that were implemented in response to those incidents. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON, MDS Coordinator, nurses, and CNAs, revealed that while interventions were communicated verbally during shift changes and through other informal means, the formal care plans were not consistently updated. The MDS Coordinator relied on notifications from the Fall Committee or Unit Managers to update care plans, and if not informed, updates were not made. Staff acknowledged that interventions were being carried out but admitted that documentation in the care plans was lacking. Facility policies reviewed also emphasized the need for interdisciplinary involvement and timely updates to care plans following changes in resident condition, which was not consistently followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙