Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Mesquite Tree Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Inaccurate MDS Diagnoses and Medication Documentation: Two residents had mismatches between MDS coding, diagnoses, and antidepressant use. One resident’s MDS omitted depression even though the care plan, psych notes, and orders showed fluoxetine for major depressive disorder; another resident’s MDS listed depression but did not show antidepressant use in Section N even though the care plan, psych notes, and orders showed sertraline for depression. The NP, LPC, DON, MDS LVN, and ADM all acknowledged the record discrepancies.
Care plans for three residents lacked discharge goals, measurable objectives, time frames, and interventions. One resident had sepsis, metabolic encephalopathy, and MS; another had sepsis, metabolic encephalopathy, and pneumonia; and a third had dementia, heart failure, and lumbar disc degeneration with pain. Their MDS assessments reflected no active discharge planning, and staff confirmed the discharge plans and goals were not included or had been inadvertently resolved.
Kitchen Food Safety and Labeling Deficiencies: A dietary aide was observed in the kitchen without a hairnet, and several food items in carts and stand-by refrigerators were left unlabeled and undated, including tea, orange juice, ground turkey, breakfast sausage, shepherd's pie, and a tea urn. A chicken breast was also found thawing in a bowl of water without running water. The DM and ADM acknowledged staff expectations for hair restraints, labeling, dating, and proper thawing, and staff stated they had not had recent kitchen training.
A resident with Parkinsonism, depression, and schizoaffective disorder, who was cognitively intact, was transferred to a sister facility due to ongoing roommate conflicts and a desire for a private room, but the facility did not provide the required written notice detailing the transfer, appeal rights, or Ombudsman contact information. Surveyors could not reach the resident or her representative during the investigation, while the Ombudsman reported learning of the move only when visiting another facility and stated that the resident said she did not know why she had been moved. The administrator acknowledged that no written correspondence documenting the transfer could be found and that staff had not been notifying the Ombudsman of transfers or discharges except in special circumstances, contrary to the facility’s own transfer and discharge policy.
A resident with multiple respiratory and neurological conditions was observed receiving oxygen therapy without a physician's order, and the care plan and MAR did not reflect oxygen use. Nursing staff and leadership confirmed the absence of an order, and facility policy requires such orders for oxygen administration.
Two residents who required substantial assistance with ADLs were found with dirty, long, and jagged fingernails, despite care plans specifying staff support for nail care. Staff interviews confirmed that nail care responsibilities were shared among CNAs and nurses, but the required services were not provided as scheduled or needed.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions was unable to access their call light because it was left in a closed nightstand drawer after bed linens were changed. The CNA responsible admitted forgetting to return the call light to within the resident's reach. Facility staff confirmed that call lights are expected to be accessible at all times, and the failure to do so was contrary to the resident's care plan and facility policy.
A facility with 144 beds did not employ a qualified full-time social worker for over two months, instead dividing social work duties among the DON and Administrator. Despite policy guidance and corporate advice to seek assistance from another facility's social worker if needed, no such contact was made, and the position remained vacant.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect a change from full code to DNR, despite having received consent. The resident, with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, was at risk of being resuscitated against her wishes. Staff interviews revealed confusion over responsibility for updating the care plan.
The facility failed to provide necessary nail care for four residents, including those with Alzheimer's, dementia, and arthritis, leading to long and dirty fingernails. Despite care plans and staff responsibilities, the residents did not receive adequate assistance, highlighting a deficiency in maintaining personal hygiene.
The facility's kitchen failed to store food items according to professional standards, with observations of uncovered sausages in the refrigerator and uncovered pasta and cream of wheat in dry storage. The Dietary Manager confirmed that cooks were responsible for covering food items, and acknowledged the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness due to this oversight.
A resident in isolation for enterocolitis was found with her call light on the floor, out of reach, preventing her from calling for assistance. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation that call lights should always be within reach, as per facility policy. Despite regular in-service training, the deficiency occurred, potentially impacting the resident's ability to receive timely care.
A CNA failed to adhere to infection control protocols by not wearing a gown while transferring a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to an indwelling urinary catheter. Despite signage and training, the CNA only donned gloves, breaching the facility's infection prevention policy designed to prevent the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs).
The facility failed to provide necessary nail care for two residents, leading to long and dirty fingernails. One resident, with a history of stroke, was unable to cut her nails due to her condition and had not received assistance since admission. Another resident, with cognitive impairment, also required assistance but had similarly neglected nail care. Staff interviews revealed that both CNAs and nurses were responsible for nail care, except in cases of diabetes. The DON acknowledged the expectation for regular nail care and the potential infection control issues from neglect.
A resident with cognitive impairments and unsteady gait was involved in a physical altercation with a new hospitality aide (HA) who attempted to retrieve snacks from the resident's jacket. The incident, which occurred in the dining room, led to the resident falling to the ground without injuries. The HA was terminated following the incident, and the facility confirmed the abuse after reviewing the situation.
A facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program when a CNA did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes during incontinence care for a resident. The resident, who required extensive assistance and was incontinent, was at risk of cross-contamination and infection. Interviews with staff confirmed awareness of hand hygiene protocols, but the CNA admitted to missing steps. Facility policies required proper hand hygiene, which was not followed in this instance.
Inaccurate MDS Diagnoses and Medication Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected resident status for 2 of 5 residents reviewed. For one resident with encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, and mild cognitive impairment, the quarterly MDS dated 03/17/2026 showed a BIMS score of 09 and documented an antidepressant in Section N, but depression was not listed as an active diagnosis in Section I. The resident’s care plan identified use of fluoxetine for depression, and orders, psychiatric evaluation, psychological notes, and informed consent all reflected treatment for major depressive disorder and depression. For another resident with dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and a severe BIMS score of 01, the quarterly MDS documented depression in Section I, but Section N did not include antidepressants as active medications. The resident’s care plan identified sertraline as a psychotropic medication related to depression, and the medication order reflected sertraline 50 mg by mouth in the morning for depression. Psychiatric evaluation and consultation notes also stated the resident had major depressive disorder and was actively treated with sertraline. During interviews, the NP stated both residents should have diagnoses that correlated with the antidepressants they were receiving and that the records contained discrepancies. The LPC stated the first resident did have depression and she did not know why it was not on the face sheet. The DON, MDS LVN, and ADM each acknowledged the discrepancies in the residents’ records and discussed the need for diagnoses, care plans, and medications to match. The facility’s MDS Accuracy Guidelines stated that all sections of the MDS must be completed accurately by qualified staff and signed as accurate.
Care Plans Missing Discharge Goals and Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for three residents by not including measurable objectives, time frames, or interventions for discharge planning. Resident #1 was a 56-year-old male re-admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, metabolic encephalopathy, and multiple sclerosis; his quarterly MDS reflected an overall goal for discharge to remain in the facility and that active discharge planning was not already occurring, yet his comprehensive care plan documented no focus, goals, or interventions for discharge plans. Resident #2 was a 74-year-old male re-admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, metabolic encephalopathy, and pneumonia; his quarterly MDS also reflected no overall discharge goal and no active discharge planning, and his comprehensive care plan likewise contained no discharge-related focus, goals, or interventions. Resident #3 was an 89-year-old male admitted with diagnoses including intervertebral lumbar disc degeneration with pain, dementia, and heart failure; his quarterly MDS reflected no overall discharge goal and no active discharge planning, and his comprehensive care plan did not include discharge-related focus, goals, or interventions. During interview, the LVN confirmed that these residents did not have discharge plans and goals included on their care plans and stated that such items should have been added when care plans were updated. The DON stated that the MDS nurse, DON, and ADONs all contributed to care plans, and an RN stated that Resident #1 had previously had a discharge goal on his care plan but it had been inadvertently resolved.
Kitchen Food Safety and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional food safety standards in its only kitchen. During observation on 03/03/26, Dietary Aide A was seen in the kitchen wearing a baseball cap with hair extending past her ears and no hairnet. The DM stated that all employees were expected to wear hairnets when they entered the kitchen if they had hair, and stated Dietary Aide A had been told before to put on a hairnet. Dietary Aide A stated she had been working in the kitchen for 7 years and said she had always had a hairnet on, but if she had a baseball cap on, she had never been told to put on a hairnet. Multiple food items were observed in the kitchen and stand-by refrigerators without labels or use-by dates. Two pitchers containing a dark red liquid were on a cart with no product label or use-by date. Two pitchers containing a yellow-orange liquid in stand-by refrigerator 1 of 2 also had no label or use-by date. A 3.5-gallon tea urn at the back of the food line had no label or use-by date. In stand-by refrigerator 1 of 2, ground meat in a metal bin, brown meat in a metal bin, and vegetables with meat in a metal bin were all not in their original packages and had no label or use-by date. The DM stated the dark red liquid was tea, the yellow-orange liquid was orange juice, the ground meat was ground turkey, the brown meat was breakfast sausage, and the food with vegetables was shepherd's pie made the day before. A chicken breast was also observed sitting in a metal bowl not in its original package on one side of the sink and submerged in water, but there was no running water from the faucet. The chicken had no label or use-by date. The DM stated the chicken breasts were supposed to be thawed under running water and said he was not sure why the chicken was sitting in a bowl full of water. Dietary Aide A, [NAME] B, Dietary Aide C, and the ADM all stated that kitchen items were supposed to be labeled and dated, and that staff were responsible for doing so. The ADM stated kitchen staff needed an updated in-service and said the staff had been in-serviced over the kitchen last year, but she could not provide that in-service record.
Failure to Provide Required Written Transfer Notice and Ombudsman Notification
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide required written notice of a transfer, including appeal rights and bed-hold/transfer information, to a resident and to notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the transfer. A cognitively intact female resident with Parkinsonism, depression, and schizoaffective disorder was admitted in mid-February 2025. Her MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment, and Section Q reflected no discharge plan in place and no referral to the Local Contact Agency, with the reason documented as a discharge date within three or fewer months. Despite this, the resident was transferred to a sister facility without written documentation of the transfer details being provided to her. Surveyors attempted to contact the resident and her daughter by telephone and email in February 2026 but were unable to reach them or leave a message. During the investigation, the Ombudsman reported concern that the facility did not notify the resident in writing of why she was moved and stated that the resident told her she did not know why she had been transferred. The Ombudsman further stated that facility staff had not notified her office of any discharge or transfer and that she only learned of the transfer when she visited another facility and the resident informed her of the move. The administrator reported that the social worker, who was on leave, had arranged the transfer to a sister facility due to ongoing problems between the resident and her roommate and the resident’s desire for a private room, which she did not qualify for at the original facility. The administrator stated that the resident agreed to the transfer but acknowledged that she could not locate any written correspondence or notification documenting the transfer. She also stated that the facility had not been in the practice of notifying the Ombudsman of transfers and discharges unless there were special circumstances, despite the facility’s written policy requiring written notice to the resident and representative at least 30 days before a non-emergency transfer or discharge, including the reason, effective date, new location, appeal rights, and Ombudsman contact information.
Failure to Obtain Physician Order and Document Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident who required oxygen therapy. Upon readmission, the resident, who had a history of cerebrovascular accident, seizure disorder, asthma, COPD, respiratory failure, and severe cognitive impairment, was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula without a corresponding physician's order. The resident's comprehensive care plan and medical record did not reflect any order for oxygen use, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) also lacked documentation of oxygen therapy or its settings. During observation, the resident was found in bed with an oxygen concentrator that was beeping and displaying a yellow alarm, and the flow indicator was not visible. Nursing staff adjusted the oxygen flow to 2 L/min after responding to the situation. Interviews with nursing staff and facility leadership confirmed that the resident was receiving oxygen as needed, sometimes adjusting the flow independently, and that there was no physician's order in place for this therapy. Both the DON and the Administrator acknowledged that oxygen is considered a medication and requires a physician's order, and that orders are necessary to guide care. Facility policy also requires verification and implementation of physician orders for oxygen administration, with documentation of resident response. The lack of a physician's order for oxygen use and absence of documentation in the care plan and MAR constituted a failure to provide care consistent with professional standards and facility policy.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), specifically in maintaining good grooming and personal hygiene. Two residents who required substantial assistance with personal hygiene and bathing were observed to have dirty, long, and jagged fingernails with black discoloration underneath. Both residents expressed a desire to have their nails cleaned and trimmed. Record reviews confirmed that both residents had care plans indicating the need for staff assistance with nail care as part of their ADL support. Interviews with staff, including a CNA, LVN, and the DON, revealed that responsibility for nail care was shared among CNAs and nurses, with nurses specifically responsible for residents with diabetes. Staff acknowledged that nail care was typically performed on shower days and as needed, but both residents' nails had not been maintained according to these expectations. The facility's policy required essential ADL services, including grooming and personal hygiene, to be provided to all residents.
Call Light Not Accessible to Resident with Severe Cognitive Impairment
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple complex medical conditions, including cerebrovascular accident, seizure disorder, asthma, COPD, respiratory failure, and muscle wasting, was found unable to access their call light. During an observation, the resident was lying in bed on oxygen and reported feeling unwell, but could not call for help because the call light was stored in a closed nightstand drawer. A CNA later retrieved the call light and attached it to the resident's pillowcase, admitting that she had placed it in the drawer earlier while changing bed linens and forgot to return it within the resident's reach. Interviews with facility staff, including the CNA, DON, and Administrator, confirmed that it is the facility's policy and expectation for call lights to be accessible to all residents at all times. The facility's policy also requires staff to ensure call lights are within reach during every interaction in a resident's room. The failure to ensure the call light was accessible directly contradicted the resident's care plan, which included interventions to keep the call light within reach due to the resident's fall risk and poor safety awareness.
Failure to Employ Full-Time Social Worker in Facility Over 120 Beds
Penalty
Summary
The facility, licensed for 144 beds, failed to employ a qualified full-time social worker from late March to early June, as required for facilities with more than 120 beds. During this period, the previous social worker had left and was not replaced, leaving the position vacant for over two months. Record reviews confirmed the facility's licensed capacity and the employment dates of the previous social worker. Interviews with the ADON, DON, and Administrator revealed that social work duties were divided among existing staff, including the DON and Administrator, rather than being performed by a qualified social worker. The Administrator stated that she and the DON spoke with residents daily and relied on a third party for scheduling appointments. Although corporate leadership suggested contacting a social worker from another facility if needed, this was not done. The facility's policy indicated that the Administrator should develop a plan to cover social services duties when the position is vacant.
Failure to Update Resident's DNR Status in Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident, which included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's mental and psychosocial needs. Specifically, the facility did not update the care plan to reflect a significant change in the resident's advance directive code status from full code to DNR, despite having received the resident's consent for this change. This oversight could result in the resident being resuscitated against her wishes. The resident in question was an elderly female with severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score, and had been diagnosed with conditions such as hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and cerebrovascular accident. Despite the resident's consent for a DNR status being documented in her electronic medical record and physician's order sheet, the comprehensive care plan still listed her as full code. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and communication regarding the responsibility for updating the care plan, leading to the failure to honor the resident's DNR wishes.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, specifically in maintaining good grooming and personal hygiene. This deficiency was observed in four residents who required assistance with nail care. Resident #35, a female with Alzheimer's and severe cognitive impairment, had dirty and jagged fingernails, which she expressed a desire to have cleaned and trimmed. Despite her resistance to care, her care plan included interventions to manage her resistance, but these were not effectively implemented. Resident #45, who had intact cognition but required assistance due to arthritis, also had long fingernails. She reported that no staff had offered to cut her nails since her admission to the facility. Interviews with staff revealed that CNAs and nurses were responsible for nail care, with nurses specifically handling diabetic residents. However, there was a lack of follow-through in ensuring that Resident #45 received the necessary assistance. Residents #24 and #40, both with dementia and reduced mobility, also had long and dirty fingernails. Staff interviews indicated that CNAs were supposed to check and report nail conditions, especially for diabetic residents like Resident #40, but this was not consistently done. The facility's policy required that residents receive essential services for activities of daily living, but this was not adhered to, leading to the observed deficiencies.
Deficiency in Food Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety in its only kitchen, as evidenced by observations of uncovered food items. During an inspection, it was noted that sausages were left open in a cardboard box in the walk-in refrigerator, and a box of pasta and a box of cream of wheat were left uncovered in the dry storage area. These observations indicate a lapse in the facility's food storage practices, which could potentially lead to food contamination and food-borne illnesses among residents. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and a staff member revealed that the responsibility for covering food items in the kitchen primarily lay with the cooks. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness due to uncovered food items and stated that an in-service training on proper food covering had been conducted. The facility's policies on food storage, both refrigerated and dry, were reviewed and found to require proper covering and storage to prevent contamination, aligning with the Food and Drug Administration Food Code guidelines.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was always within reach, which is a reasonable accommodation of the resident's needs and preferences. This deficiency was observed in the case of a resident who was on isolation for enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile. During an observation, the call light was found on the floor, away from the resident's reach, while the resident was lying on her bed. The resident expressed that she wanted to call the nurse for assistance but was unable to do so because the call light was not attached to her pillow or bedsheet, and her verbal calls could not be heard due to the closed door. Interviews with staff, including an LVN, a CNA, the ADON, and the Administrator, revealed that it was the responsibility of all employees to ensure that call lights were within reach of residents at all times. The LVN and CNA acknowledged the potential problems that could arise from the call light not being within reach, such as not receiving timely assistance for activities of daily living or during a health crisis. The facility's call light response policy emphasized the importance of ensuring call lights are accessible to residents, and staff were regularly in-serviced on this policy. However, the deficiency occurred despite these measures, as the call light was not within reach of the resident, potentially compromising her ability to obtain necessary assistance.
Infection Control Breach Due to Improper PPE Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, as evidenced by the actions of a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who did not adhere to the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) protocols. During an observation, the CNA entered the room of a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) without donning the appropriate PPE, specifically a gown, while transferring the resident from a wheelchair to a bed. Although the CNA washed hands and donned gloves, the omission of the gown was a breach of the infection control protocol, which was clearly indicated by signage outside the resident's room and in the facility's infection prevention policy. The resident involved was a male with moderate cognitive impairment, diagnosed with obstructive uropathy, diabetes mellitus, and non-Alzheimer's dementia, and required EBP due to an indwelling urinary catheter. Interviews with the CNA, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and the Administrator confirmed that the staff were aware of the requirement to wear gowns and gloves for high-contact care activities with residents on EBP. The facility's policy, revised earlier in the year, mandated the use of gowns and gloves during such activities to prevent the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). Despite regular in-service training on EBP, the CNA admitted to forgetting the protocol, highlighting a lapse in adherence to infection control measures.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living for two residents, specifically in maintaining their personal hygiene through nail care. Resident #3, a female with a history of stroke and left-sided hemiplegia, required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Despite this need, her fingernails were observed to be long and dirty, with a black substance underneath, indicating a lack of nail care since her admission. Resident #3 expressed her inability to cut her nails due to her condition and stated that no staff had offered assistance since her arrival. Similarly, Resident #4, a male with cognitive impairment and muscle weakness, also required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. His fingernails were observed to be long, jagged, and dirty, with a black substance underneath. Resident #4 confirmed his inability to manage his nail care independently and expressed a need for staff assistance. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and a CNA, revealed that both CNAs and nurses were responsible for nail care, except in cases of diabetes, where only nurses were permitted to perform this task. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the expectation for nail care to be provided on shower days and as needed, highlighting the potential infection control issues associated with neglecting this aspect of care.
Resident Abuse by Hospitality Aide
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by a hospitality aide (HA). On the evening of February 16, 2024, the HA physically grabbed snacks from the resident, then engaged in a physical interaction involving tugging items back and forth until the resident fell to the ground. The incident occurred in the dining room, where the HA was seen on camera attempting to retrieve snacks from the resident's jacket, leading to a verbal and physical altercation. The resident, who had a history of unsteady gait and cognitive impairments, was left on the floor without any physical injuries. The resident involved was a male with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and unsteadiness on feet. His care plan indicated a risk for further cognitive and functional decline, and he was noted to be sensitive to noises and personal space invasion. During the incident, the HA, who was new to the facility, attempted to retrieve snacks from the resident's jacket, leading to a physical tussle. The resident threw hot liquid on the HA, who then grabbed the resident's arm, causing him to fall. The incident was witnessed by other staff members who intervened to separate the HA from the resident. The HA continued to engage verbally with the resident even after he fell. The facility's administrator confirmed the abuse after reviewing the incident and the HA's actions. The HA was terminated from employment following the incident, and the facility conducted an investigation into the matter.
Infection Control Deficiency Due to Improper Hand Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program, as evidenced by the actions of CNA A during incontinence care for a resident. The resident, a cognitively intact female with a BIMS score of 15, required extensive assistance for activities of daily living and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. During the observed care, CNA A did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes and handled clean and dirty tasks without changing gloves, which could lead to cross-contamination and infection. Interviews with CNA A, the ADON, and the DON revealed that staff were aware of the hand hygiene protocols, which include sanitizing hands before care, between glove changes, and after care. However, CNA A admitted to not realizing she missed some steps, and the ADON confirmed that CNAs should not carry gloves in their pockets. The facility's policies and procedures, as well as CNA A's skills checklist, indicated that proper hand hygiene was a requirement, yet it was not followed during the observed incident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 976 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 40 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Mesquite
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesquite Village Wellness & Rehabilitation | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Cheyenne Medical Lodge | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Edgewood Rehabilitation And Care Center | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Willowbend Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Balch Springs Nursing Home | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 2 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Mesquite Tree Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.