Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Cedar Creek Nursing And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Improper Storage of Open Food Items in Kitchen: The facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards when an opened bag of cut lettuce, half a watermelon, half a package of sliced ham, and a partially used box of muffin mix were found open, unsealed, or undated in the kitchen. The Dietary Supervisor and an employee stated these items should have been sealed and dated, and the Administrator stated kitchen items should be appropriately packed, sealed, and dated so staff would know when food was outdated.
Insulin Storage and Labeling Deficiency: The short hall med cart contained multiple insulin items that were not properly dated, including an open Lantus vial, an unopened Novolin vial, a Lantus pen, and a Novolog pen. The ADON said insulin containers should be dated for 28 days when removed from refrigeration and opened, but she was unsure when the items were taken out. The DON also confirmed insulin should be labeled with the expiration date when removed from the refrigerator, and the facility policy required pens to be dated when placed into use.
A resident with dementia/TBI and fluctuating cognition repeatedly told staff she wanted to go home with a family member, but the facility relied on an invalid MPOA/Responsible Party arrangement. The chart did not contain a valid resident-signed MPOA notarized for the named agent, and staff interviews showed they knew the resident could express her wishes yet did not document action to honor her discharge preference.
A resident with dementia, TBI, and prior severe cognitive impairment later became able to clearly express that she wanted to go home with Family Member D, but the care plan did not show updated discharge goals once she stabilized. Staff across nursing, Social Services, Activities, and administration knew she repeatedly voiced this preference, yet the chart did not show action to support her discharge wishes. The record also showed confusion about an MPOA that was not signed by the resident and no physician certification that she lacked competence to make her own health care decisions.
A resident with documented major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and a history of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder was incorrectly coded as having no MI on the PASARR PL 1 Screening. The chart also included psychiatric notes describing delusions, hallucinations, depression, and prior suicidal ideation, along with an antipsychotic order for schizoaffective disorder. During survey, the ADON described the resident as depressed and paranoid, and the MDS Coordinator acknowledged the PL 1 was inaccurate.
Incomplete and inaccurate resident clinical records: The facility’s EMR did not accurately reflect one resident’s active psych diagnoses, with schizophrenia/bipolar history and schizoaffective disorder not carried through the MDS, care plan, diagnosis tab, or PL 1 screening. For another resident, the chart lacked a valid resident-signed MPOA and physician certification of incompetence, the admission agreement was signed by family and BOM only, and staff did not document the resident’s behaviors and statements despite noting she could express her needs and wanted to go home.
Three residents experienced failures in pharmaceutical services, including missed documentation of narcotic administration by nursing staff and improper handling of a punctured Lorazepam blister pack. Nurses admitted to missing documentation due to workload, and staff were unclear on procedures for wasting controlled substances, leading to discrepancies between narcotic counts and records.
Surveyors found that food temperatures were not consistently documented, containers of food lacked discard dates, an air conditioner vent in the kitchen was unclean, and raw proteins were stored above fully cooked foods in the freezer. The CDM and staff acknowledged these lapses, which were not in line with facility policy or FDA Food Code standards.
A registered nurse left a medication cart laptop unlocked and unattended, displaying confidential information about a resident while entering another room for a medication pass. Facility leadership confirmed that the laptop should have been locked to protect resident privacy, as required by HIPAA and facility policy.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of dementia and cataracts was found to have prescribed eye drops left at bedside by an RN, allowing unsupervised access to the medication. There was no assessment or documentation authorizing self-administration, and facility policy requires medications to be administered only by licensed personnel. The DON and ADM were unaware of any self-administration assessment for the resident.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions had a personal refrigerator that was not consistently maintained at or below 41°F, and temperature documentation was incomplete for several days. The facility did not enforce its policy on safe food storage for items brought in by family or visitors.
The facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Residents complained about cold and flavorless food, with meals often being late and trays sitting in the hall for extended periods. During meal service observation, food items required reheating, and a test tray revealed cold green beans, lukewarm turkey, and overcooked tater tots. The Dietary Supervisor and Administrator acknowledged potential negative impacts on residents' quality of life.
The facility failed to provide suitable snacks to residents outside scheduled meal times, particularly at bedtime, affecting diabetic residents who did not receive snacks labeled for their needs. Interviews revealed confusion among staff about responsibility for maintaining the resident refrigerator, which contained outdated food items. The facility lacked a clear protocol for offering snacks, and there was no follow-up to ensure snacks were distributed, contributing to the deficiency.
The facility failed to follow professional standards for food service safety. During a meal service, the cook and dietary aide did not wash their hands between tasks, violating the hand washing policy. The cook also used bare hands to handle food, contrary to the no-glove policy. These actions could risk foodborne illness.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, with staff observed not sanitizing equipment or performing proper hand hygiene. An ADON used unsanitized equipment on multiple residents, while an LVN did not wash hands between glove changes during wound care. These practices were acknowledged as breaks in infection control, posing potential risks of infection transmission.
Two residents in a facility were administered insulin without proper privacy measures, as observed by surveyors. One resident was injected with insulin in full view from the hallway, while another had her blood sample taken and insulin administered with the door open and no privacy curtain used. Both residents were moderately cognitively impaired and had type 2 diabetes. The nursing staff acknowledged the oversight, and the DON emphasized the expectation of providing privacy during care.
A facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident requiring oxygen therapy. Despite medical orders for specific oxygen use, the care plan lacked details on the amount, duration, and frequency of oxygen therapy. Observations showed the resident using oxygen at 3 liters per minute, which was not documented. Interviews with staff confirmed the care plan should have been updated to reflect the resident's needs.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and mobility issues was not provided with a fall mat as ordered by the physician, posing a risk for falls. The fall mat was observed folded against the wall instead of being placed beside the bed. Staff interviews revealed confusion about responsibility for ensuring the mat's use, with the DON acknowledging the oversight.
A resident's oxygen nasal cannula was improperly stored and not replaced as needed, leading to a deficiency in respiratory care. The nasal cannula was found on the floor and in an open drawer, contrary to facility policy requiring it to be stored in a protective bag. Interviews with the ADON and DON confirmed the oversight, highlighting the importance of proper storage to prevent infections.
The facility failed to ensure proper storage of drugs and biologicals, with a resident found with a jar of mentholated ointment on their nightstand and a medication cart left unlocked and unattended. The DON confirmed that residents are not allowed to self-medicate and that medication carts should remain locked to prevent unauthorized access.
A facility failed to maintain complete medical records for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, as the guardianship paperwork had expired and no renewal was found. The resident, who requires total assistance with ADLs and has multiple diagnoses, was observed frequently yelling and was not interviewable. The administrator relied on the social services worker to update the paperwork, who confirmed it was her responsibility and planned to contact the guardian for the updated document.
The facility failed to maintain effective pest control in the kitchen, as a live roach was observed near the oven. Despite recent pest control treatment, heavy German Cockroach activity was noted, and recommended targeted service was not documented. The facility's pest control policy was not effectively implemented.
The facility failed to maintain a pest-free environment, with German cockroaches observed in various areas, including the kitchen, for about a year. Staff interviews confirmed sightings, but the pest control log lacked documentation of these incidents. The pest control service inspection reported heavy cockroach activity and recommended targeted treatment and structural repairs.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment was reportedly left on the floor by a nurse after a fall, and staff members failed to report the incident to the administrator within the required timeframe. Staff assumed the DON would handle the situation, but the DON did not report it, believing the fall did not occur. The facility's policy for immediate reporting of suspected abuse or neglect was not followed.
The facility failed to provide scheduled showers for three residents due to staffing issues on the 2-10 PM shift. A resident with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia had to repeatedly request a shower, while two other residents did not receive showers for an entire month. Staff interviews confirmed the issue was due to inadequate staffing, and the facility's administrator was aware and working on hiring more staff.
The facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality for residents when an LVN entered two rooms without knocking and another LVN left a computer screen open in a hallway displaying a resident's personal information. These actions violated the facility's policies on resident privacy and confidentiality.
A facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident with a left-hand contracture, lacking interventions to maintain or improve mobility. The resident, with a history of cerebral infarction and hemiplegia, did not receive necessary therapy or devices due to financial constraints and the absence of a restorative program. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of restorative aides and devices, and the care plan did not include measures to address the contracture, resulting in a deficiency.
A resident with a left-hand contracture did not receive appropriate care to maintain or improve mobility. Despite having a history of cerebral infarction and hemiplegia, the resident lacked devices or therapy for the contracture. The care plan did not address the contracture, and staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and action. Financial constraints and the absence of a restorative program contributed to the deficiency.
A facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan for a resident with peripheral vascular disease and multiple wounds. The resident's baseline care plan did not address her specific medical needs, including wound care for her condition. Despite receiving treatment, the comprehensive care plan was not completed, and necessary interventions were not documented, as confirmed by staff interviews.
Improper Storage of Open Food Items in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 observed kitchen. During an observation on 05/29/2026 at 10:15 AM, the standing refrigerator contained an opened bag of cut lettuce tied shut but not dated, half of a watermelon wrapped in plastic wrap but not dated when sliced open, and half a package of sliced ham left open to air without being sealed or dated with an open date. During an observation and interview at 10:18 AM, a partially used box of muffin mix was also observed open and not closed or sealed, and it was open to air. The Dietary Supervisor stated the muffin mix should have been placed in a zip top bag and dated, explaining that dating would show when the box had been opened and that sealing it would help prevent cross contamination and unwanted pests. He also stated the lettuce bag and half watermelon should have been dated and said the watermelon had been used to make salads 2 days prior. During an observation and interview at 10:25 AM, an employee was observed making ham sandwiches with the open package of ham and stated it should have been placed in a zip top bag, closed, and dated when opened so staff would know how old it was. The Administrator stated items in the kitchen should be appropriately packed, sealed, and dated so staff would know when food was outdated and should be disposed of.
Insulin Storage and Labeling Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, including the expiration date for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. During an observation and interview with the ADON, the short hall medication cart was found to contain a Novolog insulin pen dated [DATE], an open Lantus insulin vial that was undated, an unopened Novolin insulin vial in the manufacturer’s box that was undated, a Lantus insulin pen that was undated, and a Novolog insulin pen that was undated. The ADON stated that all insulin containers should be dated for 28 days when removed from the refrigerator and opened, and she was unsure when the five insulin containers had been removed from the refrigerator. The ADON said it was the nurse’s responsibility to maintain the contents of the carts and that the nurse responsible for the cart had left work early. She was unsure whether the date on the Novolog pen was the expiration date or the date the pen was opened. In an interview with the DON, she stated that all insulin containers should be labeled with the expiration date by the nurse as soon as they are removed from the refrigerator, and she was unsure why the cart contained inaccurately labeled insulin pens and vials. The facility policy titled Insulin Pen Use stated that once an insulin pen is taken out of cool storage, it can be used for up to 28 days and must be dated when placed into use.
Invalid MPOA and Unaddressed Resident Discharge Wishes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #40’s right to formulate an advance directive and failed to verify that Family Member B had valid authority to act as Responsible Party. Resident #40 was admitted with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness and Alzheimer’s disease with late onset. Her records also reflected severe cognitive impairment on a quarterly MDS, but multiple notes documented that she could express her needs and wants, was oriented at times, and told staff she wanted to go home with Family Member D. The admission agreement listed Family Member B as Responsible Party and indicated medical decisions, admission, care, and discharge decisions were authorized, but the record did not contain a valid MPOA signed by Resident #40 and acknowledged before a notary public. The MPOA in the chart showed the signature acknowledged before a notary was Family Member B’s, not Resident #40’s. The record also did not show physician certification that Resident #40 lacked competence to make health care decisions, and did not show documentation that Resident #40 authorized Family Member B as her legal guardian or agent. During the stay, staff documented that Resident #40 repeatedly stated she wanted to discharge home with Family Member D and that she did not like being at the facility. Interviews with CNA, Social Services, Activities, LVN, ADON, MDS Coordinator, DON, BOM, and the Administrator confirmed that staff were aware of her wishes and that she could verbalize them. The Administrator note described a dispute between Family Member B and Family Member D regarding discharge, law enforcement involvement, and discharge home with Family Member D at Resident #40’s request. The record did not show that Social Services, nursing leadership, or the Administrator took documented action to honor her discharge wishes after learning of them.
Discharge planning did not reflect resident’s expressed home discharge preference
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an effective discharge planning process for a resident whose condition improved and who was able to express her discharge preference. Resident #40 had diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and traumatic brain injury. Her quarterly MDS reflected severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 06, but other records and staff interviews documented that she later became able to communicate her needs and wants, participate in activities, and state that she wanted to go home with Family Member D to her home in North Carolina. The resident's care plan identified that she was resistive to care because she wanted to go home with Family Member D, and the goal focused on cooperation with care. However, the care plan did not show discharge plans once she stabilized and could make her preferences known. Facility records and interviews showed that staff were aware she repeatedly expressed a desire to discharge home with Family Member D, and multiple staff members stated she could verbalize her wishes clearly and that her cognition improved over time. The Administrator note documented that Family Member D told the facility she could provide 24/7 care, while Family Member B, listed as MPOA and responsible party, did not agree with the discharge. The record also showed confusion about the validity of the MPOA and who could make discharge decisions. The MPOA document in the chart was not signed by Resident #40, and the physician record did not show certification that she lacked competence to make health care decisions for herself. Social Services, nursing leadership, and the Administrator all acknowledged that Resident #40 expressed a desire to return home with Family Member D, but the EMR did not show action by Social Services, charge nurses, ADON, DON, or the Administrator to assist with honoring those wishes. The resident was ultimately discharged home with Family Member D after law enforcement was contacted and the physician was notified.
Inaccurate PASARR Level 1 Screening for Resident with Mental Illness
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate PASARR Level 1 screening for a resident with documented mental illness on admission. Resident #6’s record showed diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, and schizoaffective disorder. The admission MDS reflected intact cognition, no behavioral symptoms, and active depression with antipsychotic and antidepressant use, but the PL 1 Screening dated 03/31/2026 was coded “No” for Mental Illness even though the resident was documented as having a mental illness. The resident’s record also contained multiple references to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder from hospital and psychiatric records. Psychiatry documentation described a history of schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, prior suicidal ideation and depression, and later noted delusions and hallucinations. An order summary showed Secuado transdermal patch prescribed for schizoaffective disorder. The care plan included psych services to evaluate and treat as needed, but did not document bipolar or schizoaffective disorder as active diagnoses. During survey, the resident was observed standing at his doorway, appropriately dressed and groomed, and he stated he did not want to go to activities because he felt “funky.” The ADON stated the resident gets depressed and is paranoid. The MDS Coordinator stated she was responsible for ensuring the PASRR Level 1 Screening was accurate when received and acknowledged that the resident’s PL 1 Screening was inaccurate and that a new PL 1 Screening and PASRR evaluation would need to be submitted.
Incomplete and inaccurate resident clinical records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two residents. For one resident, the record contained diagnoses of major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder, while the admission MDS reflected depression and a history of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder that were not documented as active diagnoses. The care plan did not include bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder, the EMR diagnosis tab did not show bipolar disorder, the PL 1 Screening was coded No for Mental Illness despite documentation that the resident had a mental illness, and the EMR did not show submission of Form 1012. A psychiatry evaluation later documented a history of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, described as schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, per hospital records and collateral review. For the second resident, the EMR did not contain a valid MPOA signed by the resident, and the admission agreement was signed only by the family member and the business office manager. The MPOA document in the record showed the signature acknowledged before a notary was that of the family member, not the resident. The EMR also did not contain physician certification that the resident lacked competence to make health care decisions, and it did not contain documentation signed by the resident authorizing the family member as legal guardian or agent under a medical power of attorney. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident could express needs and wants, and multiple staff members stated the MPOA was not valid because it was not signed by the resident. The record also did not include progress notes documenting the resident’s behaviors and statements while at the facility. An administrator note documented a discharge dispute involving the resident, the family member, and another family member, including the resident insisting on going home and law enforcement being called. Interviews with the Activities Director, LVN, ADON, MDS Coordinator, BOM, and Administrator reflected that the resident participated in activities, verbalized needs and wants, and discussed wanting to return home, but staff did not recall whether these statements were documented in the EMR. The facility policy stated that documentation must be complete, accurate, timely, and properly signed, and that active diagnoses and required forms should be placed in the clinical record.
Failure to Ensure Accurate Documentation and Handling of Controlled Substances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of drugs and biologicals for three of eight residents reviewed. For one resident with chronic pain and moderate cognitive impairment, a registered nurse administered Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen as ordered but did not document the administration on the resident's narcotic sheet. This discrepancy was identified during shift change when the narcotic count did not match the number of medications in the cart. The nurse admitted that documentation was sometimes missed due to being busy, but confirmed the medication was given. Another resident with chronic pain, cancer, and moderate cognitive impairment had Tramadol administered by an LVN, but the administration was not documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) on two occasions, despite being recorded on the narcotic sheet. The LVN acknowledged forgetting to document in the MAR due to workload and recognized the importance of accurate documentation to track medication administration and prevent errors. A third resident with severe cognitive impairment and anxiety had a blister pack of Lorazepam punctured, but instead of wasting the dose as required, the pack was taped shut. Staff were unsure of the correct procedure, but another nurse clarified that punctured narcotic blister packs should be destroyed and witnessed by two nurses. The facility's policies required immediate removal and destruction of compromised medications and proper documentation of all administered and wasted controlled substances.
Deficiencies in Food Storage, Preparation, and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies in the facility's food service operations, specifically related to food storage, preparation, and documentation. There were several instances where food temperatures were not documented for breakfast, lunch, and dinner over multiple days, as required by facility policy. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) acknowledged that it was the cook's responsibility to record these temperatures, but he was overseeing the process and was unaware that the documentation was incomplete. Additionally, containers of jalapeno peppers, ketchup, and tartar sauce in the refrigerator were found without discard dates, contrary to professional standards and FDA Food Code requirements. Further observations revealed that the air conditioner vent in the kitchen, located above closed cereal containers, had visible black substances on it and had not been cleaned. The CDM was unsure who was responsible for cleaning the vent but agreed it needed attention. In the freezer, raw chicken was stored above pizza dough and cookie dough, which is not compliant with food safety standards that require raw proteins to be stored below fully cooked foods to prevent cross-contamination. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of these standards, but lapses in practice were evident. Record reviews showed that the facility's policies required regular cleaning of the dietary department and equipment, as well as daily documentation of food temperatures before meal service. However, the food storage policy did not specify the need for dating food products with expiration or discard dates, as outlined in the FDA Food Code. Despite these deficiencies, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported no pattern of gastrointestinal issues among residents in the past six months, based on infection control surveillance records.
Unsecured Laptop Screen Exposes Resident Information
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a registered nurse (RN) left a laptop on a medication cart unlocked and unsupervised, displaying confidential resident information, while entering a resident's room during a medication pass. This incident was observed and confirmed through interviews with facility administration, who acknowledged that the laptop should have been locked to protect resident privacy in accordance with HIPAA requirements. The facility's policy on resident rights also states that residents have the right to secure and confidential personal and medical records. The failure to lock the computer screen allowed for the possibility that resident information could be seen or accessed by unauthorized individuals passing by. The report does not specify the identity or medical history of the resident whose information was exposed, nor does it provide details about their condition at the time of the incident.
Medication Storage and Administration Protocol Not Followed
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a registered nurse (RN) left a resident's prescribed eye drop medication at the bedside, allowing the resident to access and potentially self-administer the medication unsupervised. The resident, a male with dementia and a cataract diagnosis, had a moderate cognitive impairment as indicated by a BIMS score of 11 out of 15. The medication, Prolensa Ophthalmic Solution, was ordered to be administered once daily for cataract surgery. During an interview and observation, the RN acknowledged that the medication should not have been left at the bedside, even though the resident might be capable of self-administration. Further investigation revealed that there was no documentation or assessment indicating that the resident was authorized or capable of self-administering his medications. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator were unaware of any such assessment or care plan. Facility policy requires that only licensed or legally authorized personnel administer medications and that medications are not left with residents unless proper assessment and documentation are in place. This lapse in medication storage and administration protocol led to the cited deficiency.
Failure to Maintain and Document Safe Refrigerator Temperatures for Resident Food Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and enforce a policy regarding the use and storage of foods brought in by family and other visitors for residents. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that a resident's personal refrigerator maintained a temperature at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit, as required by facility policy. Temperature logs showed that for several days, the refrigerator was above the recommended temperature, and for a subsequent period, temperatures were not documented at all. This lapse was identified through observation, interview, and record review. The resident involved was an older adult with a history of constipation, protein-calorie malnutrition, and nausea, and had moderate cognitive impairment as indicated by a BIMS score of 12 out of 15. Despite the resident reporting no illness from consuming food stored in her refrigerator, the facility's failure to monitor and document refrigerator temperatures as per policy constituted a deficiency in ensuring safe and sanitary food storage for residents.
Deficiency in Food Temperature and Palatability
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. During an initial tour, two residents complained about the food being cold and lacking flavor, with one resident noting that the food was not of restaurant quality. Confidential interviews during a Resident Meeting confirmed that the food was frequently cold and lacked taste, with several residents noting that meals were often late and trays sat on the hall in carts for over 15 minutes before being handed out. The carts used for delivering trays to the dining room were open type, providing no insulation other than dome covers. During an observation of meal service, the cook had to reheat several items to bring them up to the required temperature on the steam table. The last cart went out over an hour later than the scheduled meal service time, and the Administrator was observed checking each plate, allowing heat to escape. A test tray delivered to the state survey room revealed that the green beans were cold, the turkey was lukewarm, and the tater tots were overcooked and hard. The Dietary Supervisor and Administrator acknowledged that residents could experience weight loss and a diminished quality of life if food was served cold and not palatable.
Failure to Provide Snacks and Maintain Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents received suitable and nourishing meals and snacks outside of scheduled meal service times, particularly at bedtime. During a Resident Meeting, it was revealed that snacks were not offered at bedtime unless specifically requested by the residents. Three out of seven residents, who were diabetic, reported not receiving any snacks labeled with their names, indicating a lack of attention to their dietary needs. This oversight could potentially affect all residents, especially those with specific dietary requirements such as diabetics, by increasing the risk of unplanned weight loss and medication side effects. Interviews with various staff members, including the Dietary Supervisor (DS), Maintenance Director, and Administrator, highlighted a lack of clarity regarding responsibility for maintaining the resident refrigerator and distributing snacks. The DS showed the surveyor a refrigerator containing outdated and undated food items, and there was confusion among staff about who was responsible for cleaning and maintaining the refrigerator. The DS assumed that nursing staff were responsible for distributing snacks, while the Maintenance Director and Administrator believed that housekeeping should maintain the refrigerator. Further observations and interviews revealed that the facility did not have a clear protocol for offering snacks to residents, particularly those with dietary needs such as diabetics. The DS mentioned that a list of diabetic residents was requested, and snacks were prepared for them, but there was no follow-up to ensure these snacks were distributed. The facility lacked a policy for snacks, and the existing policy for cleaning the refrigerator was outdated, contributing to the deficiency in providing adequate nutrition and care to the residents.
Failure to Follow Food Safety Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as observed during a lunch meal service. The cook did not wash his hands between tasks, such as taking food temperatures, writing notes, flipping through pages, gathering serving utensils, and washing thermometers. Similarly, the evening cook, who was serving as a dietary aide, was observed preparing dessert items and covering bowls with plastic wrap without washing her hands. These actions were in violation of the facility's hand washing policy, which mandates frequent hand washing to prevent cross-contamination. Additionally, the cook was observed using his bare hands to place rolls on plates during meal service, contrary to the facility's no-glove policy on the steam table. The Dietary Department Glove Standard Protocol specifies that there should be no bare hand-to-food contact in the kitchen, and utensils like tongs should be used to handle ready-to-eat food items. The failure to follow these protocols could place residents at risk for foodborne illness, as the facility did not ensure proper hand hygiene and food handling practices.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Hand Hygiene and Equipment Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple instances of improper hand hygiene and equipment sanitation. During observations, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was seen administering medications to residents without sanitizing the blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter between uses. The ADON also failed to perform proper hand hygiene after administering medications to two residents, which was acknowledged as a break in infection control by the ADON during an interview. In another instance, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not perform proper hand hygiene before entering a resident's room and during wound care procedures. The LVN was observed changing gloves multiple times without washing or sanitizing hands in between, and used scissors that were not sanitized prior to use. The LVN admitted to not being trained about washing or sanitizing hands between glove changes and acknowledged the potential for cross-contamination due to these practices. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the expectation for staff to perform proper hand hygiene between glove changes and highlighted the risks of improper hand hygiene, including the spread of bacteria and infection. Despite the facility's policies on hand hygiene and infection control, these practices were not followed, leading to potential risks of infection transmission among residents.
Failure to Ensure Privacy During Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity for two residents during insulin administration. Resident #11, a moderately cognitively impaired female with type 2 diabetes, was observed receiving an insulin injection without privacy measures in place. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) administering the injection did not close the bedroom door or pull the privacy curtain, leaving the resident exposed to view from the hallway. Despite the resident stating it did not bother her, the LVN acknowledged forgetting to provide privacy, recognizing it as a dignity issue. Similarly, Resident #27, also moderately cognitively impaired and diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, was administered insulin without adequate privacy. The LVN left the bedroom door open and did not use the privacy curtain while obtaining a blood sample and administering the insulin injection. Although the resident expressed that it did not bother her, the LVN admitted to not providing privacy, assuming it was acceptable since the resident did not have a roommate. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that it was expected for nursing staff to provide privacy by at least pulling the privacy curtain and closing the door during care. The lack of privacy during these procedures was identified as an invasion of privacy, with the DON emphasizing the importance of maintaining residents' dignity in their living environment. A policy and procedure regarding privacy and dignity was requested but not provided at the time of the report's exit.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident, which included specific interventions for the use of oxygen therapy. The resident, a female with diagnoses including dementia, heart failure, pneumonia, and shortness of breath, was admitted and readmitted to the facility. Her medical records indicated the need for oxygen therapy, with specific orders to check oxygen saturation every shift and to use oxygen at 2 liters per minute as needed. However, the comprehensive care plan did not specify the amount, duration, or frequency of oxygen use, despite changes in the resident's orders dating back to December. Observations revealed that the resident was using oxygen at 3 liters per minute, which was not documented in the care plan. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the DON confirmed that the care plan should have been updated to reflect the resident's specific needs for oxygen therapy. The facility's policy on comprehensive care planning emphasized the need for measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' needs, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Utilize Fall Mat as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility did not utilize a fall mat for a resident as per the physician's orders. The resident, a female with severe cognitive impairment and dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers, was observed without the fall mat in place while in bed, contrary to the care plan and physician's orders. During observations, the fall mat was found folded and leaning against the wall at the foot of the bed, rather than being placed on the floor beside the bed as required. Staff interviews revealed confusion about who was responsible for ensuring the fall mat was in place, with the CNA and Hospice Aide both indicating that the mat was not in use when they entered the room. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the fall mat should be on the floor when the resident is in bed to prevent injury from falls, and that it was the responsibility of the CNA, nursing staff, and ultimately the DON to ensure compliance with this safety measure.
Improper Storage and Handling of Oxygen Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident who required oxygen therapy, as observed during multiple instances. The resident's oxygen nasal cannula was not properly stored or protected when not in use, which is inconsistent with professional standards of practice and the facility's policy. Observations revealed that the nasal cannula was left on the floor and in an open drawer, rather than being stored in a protective bag. The tubing was also not replaced as needed, despite being visibly contaminated and dated several days prior. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the improper handling and storage of the oxygen equipment. The ADON acknowledged that the tubing should have been replaced and stored correctly, while the DON emphasized the importance of keeping the tubing clean to prevent infections. The facility's policy on oxygen administration requires that tubing be changed when contaminated and stored properly, which was not adhered to in this case.
Improper Storage of Drugs and Biologicals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage of drugs and biologicals, as evidenced by two specific incidents. In the first incident, a resident was found to have a jar of mentholated ointment on their nightstand, despite the facility's policy that residents are not allowed to self-medicate. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of dementia and other health conditions, was observed with the ointment on multiple occasions. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that no residents were permitted to have medications at their bedside due to the risk of inappropriate use or access by other residents, particularly those who wander. In the second incident, a medication cart on The Long Hall was found unlocked and unattended during a medication pass. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) acknowledged the oversight, noting that it posed a risk as any resident or unauthorized person could access the medications. The DON reiterated the expectation that medication carts should remain locked and secured to prevent unauthorized access. The facility's policy on medication storage emphasizes that medications should be stored safely and securely, accessible only to authorized personnel.
Incomplete Medical Records Due to Expired Guardianship
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for a resident, specifically regarding the current status of the resident's guardianship paperwork. The resident, a male with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including unspecified dementia and major depressive disorder, was admitted to the facility with a guardian as the only emergency contact and responsible party. The guardianship paperwork on file had expired, and no renewal was found in the medical record, which could affect the validity of consent for treatment. During the survey, the resident was observed to be frequently yelling and was not interviewable due to cognitive issues. The facility's administrator acknowledged the importance of keeping guardianship paperwork up to date and indicated reliance on the social services worker for this task. The social services worker confirmed it was her responsibility to maintain current guardianship paperwork and stated she would contact the guardian to obtain the updated document.
Ineffective Pest Control in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain effective pest control in the kitchen, as evidenced by the presence of a live roach observed crawling on the wall near the oven, which was next to the steam table. This incident was witnessed during an observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor, who promptly removed the roach and informed the Administrator to contact the pest control company. Despite recent pest control treatment, the presence of roaches indicates that the measures taken were insufficient. A review of the pest control log revealed that the pest control company had visited the facility on a previous date to address roaches and other pests. The report from this visit noted heavy German Cockroach activity in the kitchen and recommended an after-hours targeted service of kitchen equipment. However, there was no documentation indicating that this recommended service was carried out. The facility's policy for insect and rodent control, dated 2012, outlines procedures for maintaining an insect and vermin-free environment, but the observed deficiency suggests these procedures were not effectively implemented.
Failure to Maintain Pest-Free Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident environment free of pests and rodents, as evidenced by the presence of German cockroaches. Interviews with staff and residents revealed that cockroaches had been observed in various parts of the facility, including the kitchen, for about a year. Despite the presence of pests, the facility's grievance and pest control logs did not reflect any reports of cockroaches, indicating a lack of documentation and communication regarding the issue. The facility's policy on insect and rodent control, which requires maintaining an effective pest control program, was not effectively implemented. Interviews with staff, including CNAs, an LVN, and the DON, confirmed sightings of live roaches and previous incidents involving mice. The pest control service inspection report noted heavy German cockroach activity in the kitchen and recommended after-hours targeted service and structural repairs to prevent pest access. The ADM acknowledged that staff were expected to document pest sightings in the pest control log, but this was not consistently done, preventing timely intervention by the maintenance director.
Failure to Report Alleged Neglect in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, as required by regulations. This deficiency was identified in the case of a resident who had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with mobility. The resident was reportedly left on the floor by a nurse after a fall, and staff members did not report this incident to the administrator within the mandated timeframe. Interviews with staff members revealed that they were aware of the incident where the nurse left the resident on the floor, but they assumed it would be handled by the Director of Nursing (DON). The staff members did not report the incident directly to the administrator, as they believed the DON would take the necessary steps. The DON, however, did not report the incident to the administrator, as she believed the fall did not occur and therefore no neglect took place. The administrator stated that he expected all allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation to be reported to him directly. However, the staff had been trained to report such incidents to the DON, which led to a breakdown in communication and reporting. The facility's policy required immediate verbal reporting of suspected abuse or neglect to the Abuse Preventionist or designee, but this protocol was not followed in this case.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers Due to Staffing Issues
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to perform activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. This deficiency was identified for three residents who were scheduled to receive showers on the evening shift of Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. However, due to staffing issues, these showers were not consistently provided. Specifically, on a Monday shift, only one CNA was available, which resulted in the showers not being completed for the residents. Resident #1, who has a history of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, and requires extensive assistance with bathing, reported having to repeatedly ask staff for a shower. Despite eventually receiving a shower, the resident expressed frustration over the uncertainty of receiving necessary care. Resident #4, who requires supervision or touching assistance with bathing due to cognitive and physical impairments, did not receive a shower for the entire month of January 2025, as documented in the POC task records. Similarly, Resident #5, who has dementia and requires setup or cleanup assistance, also did not receive a shower for the same period. Interviews with staff revealed that the lack of adequate staffing on the 2-10 PM shift contributed to the failure to provide showers. A CNA working that shift confirmed the inability to complete resident baths, and an LVN acknowledged awareness of the issue, noting that it had been ongoing since December 2024. The facility's administrator was informed of the situation and was in the process of addressing staffing shortages. The facility's policy on bathing emphasizes the importance of regular showers for maintaining hygiene and comfort, yet this standard was not met due to the staffing challenges.
Privacy and Confidentiality Breach by LVNs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of residents' personal and medical records, as observed in two separate incidents involving Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs). In the first incident, LVN J was observed entering two residents' rooms without knocking, which was confirmed during an interview with LVN J, who acknowledged the oversight and expressed an intention to improve. This action violated the residents' right to personal privacy as outlined in the facility's policy. In the second incident, LVN Z left a computer screen open in a hallway, displaying a resident's personal information while people passed by. During an interview, LVN Z admitted to forgetting to turn off the monitor due to being preoccupied with checking residents' lunch trays. This oversight was a breach of the facility's policy on safeguarding resident confidentiality and personal privacy, which mandates that access to personal and medical records be limited to authorized personnel only.
Failure to Address Resident's Hand Contracture in Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with a left-hand contracture. The resident, who had a history of cerebral infarction, epilepsy, and hemiplegia, did not have interventions in place to maintain or improve mobility in the affected hand. Observations revealed that the resident's care plan lacked specific measures to address the contracture, such as the use of a device to prevent fingernails from digging into the skin. Interviews with staff, including a CNA and a PT, confirmed that the resident's left hand was contracted and that there were no restorative aides or devices available to assist with the condition. The PT mentioned that the resident did not have the finances for therapy, and the facility occasionally paid for therapy services. However, the resident had not received a splint or device for the left-hand contracture, and there was no restorative program in place due to the facility's financial constraints and the impact of COVID-19. The MDS coordinator acknowledged that the resident's care plan did not include restorative services, and the facility's policy on comprehensive care planning was not effectively implemented. The resident's financial situation and lack of insurance coverage were cited as reasons for the absence of therapy and restorative interventions. Despite having funds in a trust, the resident's care plan did not reflect necessary interventions to address the contracture, leading to a deficiency in meeting the resident's medical and physical needs.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Care for Resident's Hand Contracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with limited mobility, specifically regarding the management of a left-hand contracture. The resident, who had a history of cerebral infarction, epilepsy, and hemiplegia affecting the left side, was observed to have a left-hand contracture without any devices to maintain or improve mobility. Interviews with the resident and staff revealed that no interventions were in place to prevent the fingernails from digging into the skin, and there was no therapy or restorative program addressing the contracture. The resident's care plan did not include interventions for the left-hand contracture, despite the resident's condition being documented in various records. The facility's physical therapist confirmed that the resident had not received a splint or device for the contracture and that the facility lacked restorative aides. Financial constraints were cited as a reason for the lack of therapy, with the facility occasionally covering therapy costs due to the resident's limited insurance coverage. Interviews with staff, including CNAs and the MDS coordinator, indicated a lack of awareness and action regarding the resident's contracture. The facility had previously had a restorative program, but it was discontinued, and no current policies or interventions were in place to address the resident's needs. The absence of a comprehensive care plan for the contracture and the lack of restorative services contributed to the deficiency in care for the resident.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident with Vascular Disease
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including peripheral vascular disease and multiple wounds. The resident, an 84-year-old female, was admitted with diagnoses such as sepsis, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, and peripheral vascular disease, particularly affecting her right foot. Despite these conditions, the baseline care plan only addressed fall prevention, wound care for lacerations and skin tears, and diabetes management, without specific interventions for the resident's peripheral vascular disease or wound care. The resident's medical records indicated severe peripheral artery disease and other complications, including a lower extremity ulcer with cellulitis and MRSA. The resident received treatment for arterial wounds as ordered by the physician, but the comprehensive care plan did not reflect these interventions. Interviews with staff, including the MDS nurse and the former DON, revealed that the comprehensive care plan was not completed within the required timeframe, and the necessary interventions for the resident's condition were not documented. The absence of a comprehensive care plan was acknowledged by the facility's staff, including the administrator and the MDS nurse, who admitted that the plan was not developed as required. The failure to document and communicate the necessary interventions for the resident's peripheral vascular disease and wound care through a comprehensive care plan could have impacted the quality of care provided to the resident, as it did not capture the physician's orders or the resident's specific needs.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 107 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bandera
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir At Bandera | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Avir At Comfort | 19.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| River Hills Health And Rehabilitation Center | 19.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Avir At Kerrville | 20.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Kendall House Wellness & Rehabilitation | 21.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Cedar Creek Nursing And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.