Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Prince George Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Undated and Improperly Stored Food Items in Kitchen: The facility failed to date, label, and/or cover multiple food items stored in the kitchen, including open refrigerated items such as milk, cabbage, cheese, eggs, and turkey slices, as well as numerous open, undated frozen foods in the freezer. The DM confirmed that food should be kept in closed packaging and dated when removed from storage, and stated there was no schedule for checking food dates or expiration.
The facility failed to ensure timely written notice of Medicare non-coverage for two residents. SNFABN and NOMNC forms were signed by SS staff, but the residents or their authorized representatives did not sign, and the record lacked documentation of who was contacted, telephone attempts, or mailing of the notices when phone notification was unsuccessful. SS staff stated both residents were cognitively impaired, but could not verify the notification process in the chart.
A resident with a right-hand contracture had an MDS that did not show any upper-extremity ROM limitation, even though the face sheet, active orders, and care plan all documented the contracture and splint use. The ADON confirmed the contracture at bedside, and the MDSC stated the MDS was incorrectly coded and should have reflected the hand contracture.
A resident with a right-hand contracture did not have the ordered splint in place despite OT guidance, a care plan for splint/brace use, and an active order for nursing to verify placement of the fabricated palm roll splint. During observation, staff confirmed no device was present, and the ADON and DON stated therapy had discontinued the splint. The restorative CNA reported difficulty locating the splint and said the resident needed a new one.
A resident with neurogenic bladder and an indwelling catheter was observed with the catheter collection bag hanging on the side of the bed and visible from the hallway instead of being kept in a privacy bag as ordered. Staff confirmed the bag should have been in a privacy pouch for privacy and dignity, and the DON stated it should have been changed when the resident returned from a urology appointment. The facility did not have a policy related to privacy bags for catheters.
Undated and Improperly Stored Food Items in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to date, label, and/or cover food products stored in the kitchen, contrary to its Nutrition Policies and Procedures for food safety in receiving and storage. During a kitchen tour, the main walk-in refrigerator contained an open cardboard box with 78 tomatoes, 10 of which had visible black spots; an open half gallon of milk that was half full and had no date label; a head of cabbage without plastic wrapping or date labels; an open cardboard box of individually wrapped cheese slices with no date labels on the box or wrap; a bag of peeled hard-boiled eggs containing 24 eggs that was not dated; and an open cardboard box of individually wrapped turkey slices with no date labels on the box or wrap. The main walk-in freezer also contained multiple open, undated boxes and bags of frozen foods, including chicken cutlets, corn dogs, chicken nuggets, hot dogs, garlic toast, and fish. Several items had ice crystals. A five-pound cylinder of frozen ground beef had a use-by date of 05/31/26. The Dietary Manager confirmed that products should be in closed packaging and dated when removed from the main refrigerator, that products should be used before the date expires, and that there was no schedule for food to be checked for dates or expiration.
Failure to Provide Timely Medicare Non-Coverage Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely written notification of Medicare non-coverage through the SNFABN or NOMNC for two residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. Facility policy required residents or their authorized representatives to be advised in writing at least two days before Medicare-covered services ended, with documentation of telephone contact attempts, mailing of the notice if the representative could not be reached, and a signed notice or documented refusal witnessed by staff. For one resident, the SNFABN showed the skilled services start date and was signed by Social Services staff, but it did not contain the resident’s or authorized representative’s signature, and there was no documentation identifying who was notified, documenting telephone contact, multiple attempts, or mailing of the notice. The resident remained at the facility. For the second resident, the NOMNC showed Medicare-covered skilled services were scheduled to end, and it was signed by Social Services staff, but the resident’s or authorized representative’s signature was absent. The form instead reflected that Social Services notified the responsible party and was witnessed by staff, yet there was no documentation identifying who was contacted, documenting telephone notification, multiple contact attempts, or showing that the notice was mailed before discharge. During interview, Social Services staff stated both residents were cognitively impaired and attempts were made to notify responsible parties by telephone, but staff could not identify who had been contacted, could not produce documentation of the attempts or successful notification, acknowledged the notices were not mailed, and confirmed no progress notes documented the notification attempts or receipt of the notices.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Resident With Right-Hand Contracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected a contracture for one resident, R74. Review of the resident’s face sheet showed an admission diagnosis of contracture of muscle, and the active orders required verification of placement of a fabricated palm roll splint to the right hand. The care plan also identified the resident as requiring a splint/brace due to contracture of the right hand and monitoring of splinted sites for hygiene and skin breakdown. However, the quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/23/26 indicated no functional limitation in range of motion with the upper extremities. During interview, the ADON confirmed the resident’s right hand was contracted, and the MDSC stated the MDS was incorrectly coded and should reflect the resident’s right-hand contracture. The facility did not have a policy related to MDSs.
Failure to Maintain Ordered Splint for Resident with Hand Contracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 74, who had a diagnosis of contracture of muscle and was identified in the care plan as requiring a splint/brace for a right-hand contracture, had the ordered splint in place. The resident’s OT discharge summary stated the resident was to demonstrate optimal positioning of the right hand in extension and tolerate use of an orthotic for five hours to support joint/skin protection and pain management/prevention. The active order required nursing to verify placement of the fabricated palm roll splint to the right hand, and the restorative program included PROM of the right hand and donning of the splint. During observation, the resident was lying in bed with a right-hand contracture and no device present. CNA 6 confirmed the resident’s right hand was contracted and that no device was present. The ADON also confirmed there was no device and stated therapy had discontinued it to see how the resident would do without it. The DON likewise confirmed the resident did not have a device and stated therapy had discontinued the splint. The Interim Director of Rehabilitation stated the resident had been discharged from therapy earlier in the year, had a splint, and had been handed off to the restorative team. The restorative CNA stated she could not find the rolled splint, had gone to OT because the resident needed a new one, and later saw it on the resident.
Catheter Bag Not Kept in Privacy Bag
Penalty
Summary
An indwelling urinary catheter collection bag for a resident with neurogenic bladder was not maintained in a privacy bag as ordered. The resident’s record showed a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, a care plan directing that the suprapubic catheter collection bag be stored inside a protective dignity pouch, and an active order for a privacy bag in place. The resident also had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating cognitive intactness, and had an indwelling catheter. During observations, the catheter bag was seen hanging on the side of the bed facing the door, not in a privacy bag, and it could be seen from the hallway. The catheter remained in this condition during a later observation the same day. A CNA confirmed the catheter should have been in a privacy bag for privacy, and the ADON stated it should have been in a privacy bag for dignity reasons and that the resident had returned from a urology appointment without it. The DON stated the nurse should have seen it and changed it when the resident returned from the appointment, and the facility did not have a policy related to privacy bags for catheters.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Georgetown
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak Hollow Of Georgetown Rehabilitation Center Llc | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Lakes At Litchfield | 15 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Nhc Healthcare - Garden City | 25.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Angel Oak Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Llc | 30.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Pruitthealth- Conway At Conway Medical Center | 35.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Prince George Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.