Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Mon Valley Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility did not document that two residents or their representatives were invited to participate in care conferences, despite facility policies requiring resident-centered care planning and advance notice of conferences. One resident with HTN, diabetes, and post-amputation care needs had a discharge plan involving family support and home health, and a care conference note stated the resident and family declined the invite, yet no record of an actual invitation was found; the resident’s family member also reported never being invited and not receiving information on Medicare payment limits and length of stay. Another resident with HF, COPD, and a seizure disorder had a similar note indicating the resident and family declined the invite, but again there was no supporting documentation of an invitation. The DON acknowledged that the facility failed to document invitations for these two residents.
A resident with diabetes, hypertension, and a recent amputation was discharged home after rehab despite documentation that the resident lived alone and would not have supervision. The care plan called for discharge home with family support and home health, but progress notes repeatedly stated the resident lived alone, and the resident had requested an extended rehab stay with a new prosthesis. After an insurance appeal was denied, the resident was discharged home with borrowed DME and a sliding board intended for supervised use, but without the prosthetic leg, which remained at the facility. The DON acknowledged the expectation that the son would help, despite records showing the resident lived alone, and hospital records later documented the resident’s inability to ambulate or care for himself at home without the prosthesis.
A resident with diabetes, hypertension, and a recent amputation was discharged home after losing an insurance appeal, despite living alone and lacking funds for private pay. Although the care plan anticipated discharge with family support and home health, documentation showed that when the resident later wished to extend rehab with a new prosthesis, the SW was unavailable and nursing and rehab staff lacked updated insurance information. The family reported the resident was not offered help with Medicare/Medicaid or Social Security Disability applications, and the record contained no evidence of referrals or assistance with these benefits, reflecting a failure to provide required medically related social services and information on coverage and eligibility.
The facility did not maintain a fully operational call bell system on one nursing unit, as observed when central and room call lights failed to illuminate as expected. This issue was confirmed by the Maintenance Director, indicating residents could not reliably call for staff assistance.
Surveyors observed that several rooms on one nursing unit had soiled floors with black skid marks and cracked floor tiles, compromising the cleanliness and homelike environment required by facility policy. The NHA confirmed these deficiencies during the investigation.
Surveyors found that the facility did not post required Adult Protective Services (APS) contact information, including agency name, address, email, and phone number, in accessible areas for residents and their representatives. The DON confirmed the absence of this information, resulting in non-compliance with regulations requiring the posting of pertinent State agency and advocacy group contacts.
The facility did not display written information for residents or their responsible persons on how to apply for Medicare and Medicaid benefits or obtain refunds for payments covered by these programs, as confirmed by observation and the DON.
The facility did not consistently complete required dialysis communication forms for three residents with end stage renal disease, resulting in incomplete documentation of care and coordination with the dialysis center for multiple treatment dates, as confirmed by the DON.
The facility did not maintain required documentation for automatic sprinkler system inspections, with no records available for inspections in the last two quarters of the previous year. The Facility Maintenance Director confirmed the absence of these inspection records.
The facility did not complete one of the two required semi-annual kitchen exhaust hood cleanings, as documentation showed only one cleaning was performed and staff confirmed the lack of records for the second cleaning. This affected one smoke compartment.
The facility failed to maintain acceptable food storage practices, leading to potential contamination and microbial growth risks. Observations revealed black fuzzy material on the walk-in cooler's fans and ceiling, and significant ice buildup in the deep freezer, affecting stored food. These issues were confirmed by a dietary employee and the DON.
The facility failed to implement a Water Management Program to prevent Legionella and did not follow proper infection control during a dressing change. A nurse contaminated a clean dressing by not changing gloves after cleansing a wound and failed to wash hands before replacing a contaminated dressing.
A resident with COPD and heart conditions was not provided appropriate respiratory care as prescribed. The care plan lacked specific interventions for oxygen therapy, and observations revealed the resident's nasal cannula was not reapplied after a transfer, and the humidification cannister was repeatedly found empty. A nurse aide confirmed it was their responsibility to maintain the cannister, and the DON acknowledged the deficiency.
The facility did not inform residents or their representatives that signing the arbitration agreement was voluntary and failed to allow a 30-day rescission period. Instead, the agreement misleadingly stated a three-day revocation period and required immediate vacating if canceled. This affected all 20 admitted residents, as confirmed by the NHA.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including a history of cancer and dizziness, exhibited slurred speech and nonsensical talking after receiving Lorazepam. An LPN noted the change but failed to notify the physician or document further assessment, contrary to facility policy. The DON confirmed the lack of notification, highlighting a deficiency in adhering to professional standards.
A facility failed to ensure a medication regime was free from unnecessary medications for a resident. Despite the facility's policy requiring clinical indications for psychotropic medication use, a resident was administered Haloperidol and Lorazepam without documented symptoms such as anxiety or nausea. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation, and the MAR showed multiple administrations of these medications without corresponding symptom documentation.
A resident with hypertensive heart disease and macular degeneration continued to receive an ineffective antibiotic, Nitrofurantoin, despite lab results showing bacterial resistance. The facility's failure to act on these results and modify the treatment was confirmed by the DON and Nursing Home Administrator, highlighting a deficiency in monitoring antibiotic use.
The facility failed to provide training on Resident Rights to its staff, as revealed by a review of policy documents and staff interviews. The policy on in-service training, dated March 2024, aimed to ensure staff competency in enhancing residents' quality of life and care. However, no evidence of training on Resident Rights was found. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed this deficiency, violating several Pennsylvania Codes related to licensee responsibility, management, and staff development.
The facility failed to provide effective communication training for two staff members, a Nurse Aide and an LPN, as required by their in-service training policy. The deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility failed to provide mandatory QAPI training to four staff members, including a Nurse Aide, an administrative employee, an LPN, and a dietary employee, as required by the facility's in-service training policy. The deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility did not provide required behavioral health training for three staff members, including two nurse aides and a dietary employee, as per the facility's in-service training policy. The deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
Failure to Document Resident/Representative Invitations to Care Conferences
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to document that residents or their representatives were invited to participate in care conferences for two of five reviewed residents. Facility policies titled “Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team” and “Care Plans, Comprehensive [NAME]-Centered,” both dated 4/14/25, state that residents, families, and/or legal representatives are encouraged to participate in care plan development and revisions, and that residents are informed of their right to participate and provided advance notice of care planning conferences. For one resident, admitted on an unspecified date with diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, and post-surgical amputation care needs, the plan of care dated 1/14/26 included discharge planning to home with family support and home health services. A care conference note dated 12/23/25 stated that a care conference was held and that the resident and family declined the invite, but review of the clinical and paper records did not show documentation that the resident or family member had actually been invited. For a second resident, admitted on an unspecified date with diagnoses including heart failure, COPD, and a seizure disorder, a care conference note dated 12/2/25 similarly documented that a care conference was held and that the resident and family declined the invite. However, review of this resident’s clinical record also failed to show documentation that the resident or family member had been invited to the care conference. During an interview, a family member of the first resident reported that the facility did not provide information related to Medicare payment limitations and allowed time in the facility and stated that he was never invited to a care plan conference. In a separate interview, the DON confirmed that the facility failed to document the invitation of the resident or their representative to care conference meetings for two of five residents reviewed, in violation of cited Pennsylvania regulatory codes regarding resident rights, resident care policies, and nursing services.
Inappropriate Discharge of Resident Without Prosthesis and Adequate Support
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to permit a resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge the resident unless the transfer or discharge was appropriate based on the resident’s health status. Facility policy stated that discharge planning must ensure a safe transition to a post-discharge setting that meets the resident’s health and safety needs and preferences. The resident had diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, and a need for care following a surgical amputation, and the care plan identified discharge home with family support and home health services. However, multiple progress notes documented that the resident lived alone in an apartment and planned to discharge home after rehab, with no indication of consistent in-home supervision. Care conference documentation showed that a care conference was held, but the resident and family declined the invitation, and the plan of care was reviewed only with the IDT. Progress notes repeatedly recorded that the resident lived alone, and one note indicated the resident expressed a desire to extend the rehab stay with a new prosthesis, while staff lacked updated insurance information. Another note documented that the resident lost an insurance appeal and that the family chose to take the resident home that day, with arrangements for transportation and some DME (wheelchair cushion and sliding board) to be borrowed until ordered items were delivered. Interviews and hospital records further described that the resident was discharged home without his prosthetic leg and was instead provided a sliding board intended for use with supervision/assistance, despite documentation that he would be alone at home. The DON acknowledged that it was thought the resident’s son would help, but could not explain this expectation in light of the record showing the resident lived alone. The resident’s family member reported that the appeal for continued care was denied, that the resident was discharged only hours before a major snowstorm, that the resident was sent home without his prosthesis despite pleas not to discharge him without it, and that he lacked funds to pay out of pocket. Hospital documentation indicated the resident presented requesting placement, reporting inability to ambulate and care for himself at home without his prosthesis, and that the facility still had the prosthetic leg. The DON confirmed that the facility failed to permit the resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge him unless the transfer or discharge was appropriate because his health had improved sufficiently so he no longer needed facility services.
Failure to Provide Medically Related Social Services and Benefits Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide medically related social services to assist a resident in understanding and accessing insurance and public benefits needed to continue necessary care. Federal regulations at 42 CFR 483.10(g)(4) require that residents receive notices and information regarding Medicare and Medicaid eligibility and coverage in a format and language they understand, and the facility’s Director of Social Services job description included assisting discharged residents and families with placement options. The resident, who had diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, and a need for care after a surgical amputation, was admitted for rehabilitation and had a care plan goal for discharge home with family support and home health services. A progress note documented that the resident lost an insurance appeal, the family chose to take the resident home that day, and arrangements were made for transportation and durable medical equipment, with the facility temporarily lending a wheelchair cushion and sliding board. Subsequent documentation showed that the resident later expressed a desire to extend the rehab stay with a new prosthesis, but the social worker was not available and nursing and rehab staff did not have updated insurance information. Another note indicated that personal care and continued stay at the SNF level without insurance coverage were offered to the resident’s son, who declined. During interview, the resident’s family member stated that the facility had been informed the resident lived alone without supervision upon discharge and lacked funds to remain as a private pay resident, and further stated the resident was not offered assistance with completing Medicare/Medicaid or Social Security Disability applications. Review of the clinical record confirmed there was no documentation of referrals or assistance with such applications, and the DON acknowledged that the facility failed to provide medically related social services to this resident.
Failure to Maintain Fully Functioning Resident Call Bell System
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a fully functioning resident call bell system on the second-floor nursing unit, as required by facility policy. Observations revealed that when the central call light was activated in the North Hall, no resident room lights were illuminated above the doors. Additionally, in multiple instances, individual resident room call lights were illuminated above the doors, but the corresponding central hall lights for the South Hall and another hall were not illuminated. The Maintenance Director confirmed that the call bell system was not fully operational, preventing residents from reliably calling for staff assistance through the communication system.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Homelike Environment Due to Damaged and Soiled Flooring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on the second floor nursing unit. Observations revealed that one room had black skid marks and soiled floor tiles, another room had cracks in the tiles at the entrance, and a third room had multiple cracked floor tiles. These conditions were confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, who acknowledged the failure to maintain the required environment as outlined in the facility's housekeeping policy.
Failure to Post Required APS Contact Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post the required contact information for Adult Protective Services (APS) in areas accessible and understandable to residents and their representatives. Observations conducted in the first-floor lobby and the second-floor nursing unit revealed that no elements of the APS contact information, including agency name, address, email, or phone number, were posted or accessible. This omission was confirmed during an interview and rounds with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the required information was not displayed in the building. The deficiency was identified during a survey, which found that the facility did not comply with regulations mandating the posting of a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups. This list must include the State Survey Agency, State licensure office, APS, the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, the protection and advocacy network, home and community-based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, along with a statement informing residents of their right to file complaints. The lack of posted APS contact information constituted non-compliance with state code requirements.
Failure to Display Required Medicare and Medicaid Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to display written information for residents and/or their responsible persons regarding how to apply for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and how to receive refunds for previous payments covered by these programs. During observations of the first-floor lobby and the second-floor nursing unit posting locations, it was noted that this required information was not posted. In an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not have the necessary written information displayed as required by regulations. No specific residents or medical conditions were mentioned in relation to this deficiency.
Failure to Maintain Consistent Dialysis Communication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain consistent and complete communication regarding dialysis care for three residents with end stage renal disease who required regular dialysis treatments. According to the facility's own policy, licensed nurses are required to communicate with the dialysis center using a designated communication form or other written/telephonic means, documenting information such as medication administration, treatment orders, laboratory values, vital signs, advanced directives, nutrition/fluid management, treatments provided, adverse reactions, changes in condition, injuries, and transportation concerns. However, review of the clinical records and dialysis communication forms for the three residents revealed multiple instances where these forms were incomplete on several treatment dates. The affected residents had complex medical histories, including diagnoses of end stage renal disease, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and bladder cancer, and were scheduled for dialysis at specific times and days each week. Despite these needs, the required communication forms were not fully completed for numerous dialysis sessions, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing. This failure to ensure ongoing and thorough communication with the dialysis center was identified through review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews.
Failure to Maintain Sprinkler System Inspection Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the automatic sprinkler system as required, as evidenced by missing documentation for sprinkler system inspections in two instances. During a documentation review, it was found that there was no verification of any sprinkler inspections being performed in the last two quarters of the previous twelve months. The last recorded inspection was on October 15, 2024. This lack of documentation was confirmed in an interview with the Facility Maintenance Director, who acknowledged the absence of records for the required inspections.
Plan Of Correction
The quarterly sprinkler inspection will be scheduled by the Maintenance Director with completion expectation sprinkler inspection vendor by 8-8-25. I certify this document to be a true and correct statement of deficiencies and approved facility plan of correction for the above-identified facility survey.
Missed Semi-Annual Kitchen Hood Cleaning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete one of the two required semi-annual cleanings of the kitchen exhaust hood, as mandated by NFPA 101 and NFPA 96 standards for cooking facilities. Documentation and observation on July 2, 2025, revealed that the last hood cleaning was performed on December 22, 2024, and there was no documentation available for the subsequent required cleaning. This deficiency affected one of nine smoke compartments within the facility. During interviews, both the Facility Administrator and Maintenance Director confirmed the absence of documentation for the missed semi-annual hood cleaning. No information regarding specific patients, their medical history, or their condition at the time of the deficiency was provided in the report.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and or evaluation of the following plan of correction set forth in this document does not constitute admission and or agreement by the provider of the truth of the facts alleged or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. The plan of correction is prepared and or executed solely because it is required by the provisions of federal and state law. The semi-annual hood cleaning will be scheduled by the Maintenance Director with completion expectation from hood cleaning vendor by 8-8-25.
Deficient Food Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for food storage, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the main kitchen. During an observation, the walk-in cooler was found to have black fuzzy material throughout the fans and on the ceiling, with a cart of several trays of food stored underneath. Additionally, the deep freezer had abundant ice buildup on the ceiling, fan areas, and shelving, with several boxes of frozen food having blocks of ice buildup. These conditions were confirmed by a dietary employee and the Director of Nursing and Director of Maintenance during interviews.
Deficiencies in Water Management and Infection Control Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective Water Management Program to prevent and control water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Maintenance, who acknowledged that the facility had not had a Water Management Program in place since 2023. The absence of this program poses a risk of exposure to water-borne bacteria, which can lead to serious health conditions like Legionnaires' Disease. Additionally, the facility did not adhere to proper infection control practices during a dressing change for a resident. During an observation, a registered nurse placed wound care items on a resident's overbed table alongside personal items, potentially contaminating the clean field. The nurse then failed to change gloves after cleansing the wound and placed a clean dressing with the same soiled gloves, contaminating it. After leaving the room to obtain a new dressing, the nurse did not wash hands before donning new gloves and replacing the contaminated dressing. This lapse in infection control was confirmed by the nurse involved.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident, identified as Resident R1, who was admitted with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease, heart failure, and COPD. The resident was prescribed continuous oxygen therapy at 3 LPM via nasal cannula. However, the care plan did not include specific interventions for oxygen therapy, such as maintenance of humidification cannisters, changing of tubing, monitoring for skin breakdown, and recognizing signs and symptoms related to oxygen therapy that should be reported to a provider. During observations, it was noted that the resident's nasal cannula was removed during a transfer and not reapplied, and the humidification cannister on the oxygen concentrator was empty. Despite the presence of a water jug next to the concentrator, the cannister remained unfilled. A nurse aide confirmed that maintaining water in the humidification cannister was part of their responsibilities, yet it was found empty on multiple occasions. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the facility's failure to provide appropriate respiratory care for the resident.
Failure to Inform Residents of Arbitration Agreement Rights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to uphold residents' rights regarding binding arbitration agreements. Specifically, the facility did not inform residents or their representatives that signing the arbitration agreement was voluntary, nor did it allow them the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing. Instead, the agreement misleadingly stated that residents had only a three-day revocation period and required them to make immediate arrangements to vacate the facility if they chose to cancel the agreement. This deficiency affected all 20 residents admitted to the facility, as confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator during an interview.
Failure to Notify Physician of Resident's Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for Resident R21, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including a history of colon cancer, aneurysm of the aorta, cancer of the parotid gland, dizziness, and unsteadiness on feet. On a specific date, a progress note by an LPN indicated that Resident R21 exhibited slurred speech and nonsensical talking after being administered Lorazepam. The LPN documented that the oncoming shift should monitor the resident due to the medication administration but did not document any further assessment or notification of the physician regarding the resident's change in condition. The facility's policy on changes in a resident's condition requires staff to notify the attending physician of any significant changes, such as adverse reactions to medication or changes in mental status. However, the clinical record lacked documentation of any notification or further assessment following the observed change in Resident R21's condition. During an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the LPN did not notify anyone about the resident's condition change, which is a failure to adhere to the facility's policy and professional standards of practice.
Failure to Ensure Medication Regime Free from Unnecessary Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medication for a resident, identified as Resident R21. The facility's policy on psychotropic medication use requires that residents do not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. However, a review of Resident R21's clinical records and interviews with staff revealed that there was no documentation of diagnoses or symptoms such as anxiety, hallucinations, or nausea that would justify the use of psychotropic medications. Despite this, Resident R21 was administered Haloperidol and Lorazepam without proper documentation of the symptoms these medications were intended to treat. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation for Resident R21's symptoms, and it was noted that the facility had to contact the Hospice office to obtain relevant notes. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that Haloperidol and Lorazepam were administered multiple times without corresponding documentation of the symptoms they were prescribed for. This oversight was further confirmed during interviews with the Nurse Practitioner and the Director of Nursing, highlighting a failure in the facility's medication management practices.
Failure to Monitor Antibiotic Use for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor antibiotic use for a resident, identified as Resident R8, which led to the continuation of an ineffective antibiotic treatment. The facility's policy on Antibiotic Stewardship, dated March 2024, mandates that lab results and the current clinical situation be communicated to the provider to determine appropriate antibiotic therapy. However, this protocol was not followed for Resident R8. The resident, who had diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease and macular degeneration, was initially prescribed Nitrofurantoin for a urinary tract infection. A urine culture and sensitivity report later revealed that the bacteria causing the infection were resistant to Nitrofurantoin, but the resident continued to receive this medication until the original end date of the order. The failure to act on the lab results was confirmed during interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator. They acknowledged that the facility did not respond to the lab results indicating resistance to the prescribed antibiotic and did not modify the treatment to an effective antibiotic. This oversight was identified as a deficiency in the facility's monitoring of antibiotic use, as per the facility's policy and state regulations.
Failure to Provide Training on Resident Rights
Penalty
Summary
The facility was found to have a deficiency due to its failure to provide training on Resident Rights to its staff. This was determined through a review of the facility's policy and documents, as well as staff interviews. The policy titled 'Inservice Training, All Staff,' dated March 2024 and previously reviewed in March 2023, stated that the primary objective of in-service training is to ensure staff can interact in a manner that enhances residents' quality of life and care, demonstrating competency in training topics. However, the review of the facility's education documents did not show any evidence that training on Resident Rights was offered. During an interview conducted on June 17, 2024, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility's failure to provide this essential training. This deficiency is in violation of several Pennsylvania Codes, including 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) regarding the responsibility of the licensee, 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) concerning management, and 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(c) related to staff development.
Failure to Provide Effective Communication Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide training on effective communication for two staff members, Nurse Aide Employee E7 and Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E10. The facility's policy on in-service training, last reviewed in March 2023, mandates that all staff participate in training to enhance residents' quality of life and care. However, a review of training records revealed that Employee E7, hired on May 21, 2019, did not receive effective communication training between May 21, 2023, and May 21, 2024. Similarly, Employee E10, hired on May 11, 2008, lacked documented training in effective communication between May 11, 2023, and May 11, 2024. This deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator during an interview on June 11, 2024.
Failure to Provide QAPI Training to Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide mandatory training on the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for four out of ten staff members, specifically Employees E7, E9, E10, and E11. According to the facility's policy on in-service training, all staff are required to participate in training to ensure they can enhance residents' quality of life and care. However, a review of the training records revealed that these employees did not have documented QAPI training within the specified time frames. Employee E7, a Nurse Aide, did not receive QAPI training between May 21, 2023, and May 21, 2024. Employee E9, an administrative staff member, lacked training between February 12, 2023, and February 12, 2024. Employee E10, an LPN, did not have training between May 11, 2023, and May 11, 2024. Lastly, Employee E11, a dietary staff member, was not trained between March 1, 2023, and March 1, 2024. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed this deficiency during an interview.
Failure to Provide Behavioral Health Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required behavioral health training for three staff members, identified as Employees E7, E8, and E11. The facility's policy on in-service training, last reviewed in March 2023, mandates that all staff participate in training to enhance residents' quality of life and care. However, a review of training records revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E7, hired on 5/21/19, did not receive behavioral health or dementia training between 5/21/23 and 5/21/24. Similarly, Nurse Aide Employee E8, hired on 1/23/08, and Dietary Employee E11, hired on 3/1/18, also lacked documented training in these areas for the specified periods. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed this deficiency during an interview on 6/17/24.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,003 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 18 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Monongahela
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Havencrest Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 10.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 28 | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Center At Jefferson Hills, The | 11.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Southwestern Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 11.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| John J Kane Regional Center-mc | 13.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Mon Valley Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.