Kinzua Nursing And Rehab
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Warren, Pennsylvania.
- Location
- 205 Water Street, Warren, Pennsylvania 16365
- CMS Provider Number
- 395363
- Inspections on file
- 27
- Latest survey
- February 26, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 13 (1 serious)
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Kinzua Nursing And Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with schizoaffective disorder, Parkinson’s disease, and major depressive disorder was admitted with transfer orders that included lithium carbonate 300 mg ER daily, but facility staff failed to transcribe this order into the electronic medical record or MAR. A pharmacy admission review flagged the remaining lithium 150 mg dose as potentially subtherapeutic, yet this clinically significant irregularity was not addressed by staff or the physician. Over the following weeks, the resident exhibited escalating manic and psychotic behaviors, including agitation, wandering, delusions, flight of ideas, disruptive conduct, insomnia, and falls, while receiving only anti-anxiety medications for symptoms. Lab testing later showed a lithium level well below the normal range, and a neurology note documented that the lithium doses were not correctly dosed and that the resident was in active psychosis, confirming the facility’s failure to follow standards of practice and its own policies for medication transcription and pharmacist recommendations.
A resident with schizoaffective disorder, Parkinson’s disease, and major depressive disorder was admitted on transfer with an existing order for lithium 300 mg ER, but the facility failed to transcribe this order into the electronic MAR. Facility policies required clarification and transcription of transfer orders and administration of medications per physician orders, yet the lithium order was omitted from the facility physician orders, and the resident did not receive the medication for an extended period. The DON confirmed that the order was neither clarified with the physician nor entered into the medication record, resulting in the missed psychotropic therapy.
Surveyors found that the NHA and DON did not effectively manage clinical operations to ensure accurate transcription of admission medications. The NHA’s job description assigns responsibility for supervising clinical and administrative affairs, including oversight of staff and medical care, while the DON’s job description requires directing the clinical department in accordance with regulatory standards to ensure quality care. Despite these defined roles, records showed that admission medications were not transcribed accurately, indicating that key management duties related to compliance with Federal and State regulations were not carried out.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain complete and accurate medical records for several residents, including missing required documentation of a resident's death and incomplete recording of wound care treatments for others. The DON confirmed that these records lacked essential details and that treatment administration records had multiple blank entries, contrary to facility policy.
Two residents who required staff assistance for activities of daily living did not receive scheduled showers as ordered, resulting in unkempt and greasy hair. Facility records, staff and resident interviews, and direct observation confirmed that necessary personal hygiene services were not provided as required.
A resident with palliative care needs and advanced dementia returned from the hospital with an order for morphine to manage pain and dyspnea. Despite documented signs of pain and respiratory distress, the resident did not receive the prescribed morphine until the following day due to delays in obtaining the medication from the facility's dispensing unit, as confirmed by staff and the DON.
A resident with multiple medical conditions did not receive a physician-ordered topical medication because the facility was waiting for pharmacy delivery, and there was no documentation that the medication was received or administered as ordered. The DON confirmed the medication was neither obtained nor applied, and facility policy requiring timely administration and prescriber notification in case of delay was not followed.
The facility did not meet the required minimum NA-to-resident ratios on multiple day and evening shifts, as staffing records showed fewer NAs scheduled than required based on the census. This was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility did not meet required LPN-to-resident staffing ratios on several day, evening, and overnight shifts, as shown by staffing records and confirmed by the administrator. On multiple occasions, the number of LPNs scheduled was below the minimum required for the facility's census.
The facility did not meet the required minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care per resident per day on three occasions, as confirmed by review of staffing records and administrator interview.
The facility did not employ a qualified dietitian or ensure that the food and nutrition services director received required consultations from a dietitian. The designated director lacked necessary credentials, and both the DON and NHA confirmed the absence of a dietitian in any capacity since a change in ownership.
The facility did not complete comprehensive nutritional assessments for multiple residents at risk for unplanned weight loss or compromised nutritional status, as required by policy. Despite serious medical conditions and significant changes in health, no assessments were documented due to the absence of a dietitian, as confirmed by interviews with the DON and NHA.
A resident with high blood pressure, pneumonia, and unstageable pressure ulcers did not have a comprehensive care plan developed to address their skin integrity issues, despite physician orders for wound treatments and ongoing wound care consultant assessments. The DON confirmed that no care plan was in place, which was found to be non-compliant with facility policy and state regulations.
Surveyors found that care plans for several residents with complex medical conditions were not reviewed or revised within required timeframes, and some lacked necessary goals or interventions. Staff confirmed these deficiencies, which included overdue care plan target dates and incomplete documentation for issues such as skin breakdown, safety, and infection precautions.
The facility did not meet the required NA staffing ratios during an overnight shift, with a census of 74 residents requiring 4.93 NAs, but only 4.53 NAs were on duty. This staffing shortage was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility failed to ensure safety measures for two residents, leading to incidents involving wheelchair transport and fall precautions. A resident with Parkinson's Disease fell from a wheelchair due to missing footrests, while another resident with cancer fell because a pressure alarm was not plugged in. Both incidents resulted in injuries requiring hospital evaluation.
The facility failed to report incidents involving four residents to the Pennsylvania DOH. These incidents included falls and injuries requiring emergency room evaluations. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the lack of reporting, indicating a deficiency in compliance with state notification requirements.
A facility failed to maintain corridor doors as required, with a specific deficiency noted in the door to a resident room lacking positive latching. This was confirmed by the maintenance supervisor during an observation.
The facility failed to address advance directives for two residents, one with a Full Code status and another with a DNR order, lacking documentation and assistance in formulating medical care preferences. Staff confirmed the absence of POLST or advance directive documents in the residents' records, violating the facility's policy on advance directives.
The facility failed to adhere to physician's orders for three residents, resulting in deficiencies in care. A resident with a history of stroke and cancer was observed without the prescribed arm sling and cervical collar. Another resident did not have a scheduled dermatology appointment for a skin rash, as ordered. Additionally, a resident with hemiplegia was repeatedly observed without the required contracture boot. The DON confirmed these failures to follow physician's orders.
A resident with hemiplegia was not provided with the prescribed resting hand splint to prevent further decline in range of motion. Despite a sign indicating the splint should be worn during the day, observations showed the resident without it, and interviews confirmed the oversight. The process to continue therapy goals in the care plan was not effectively followed.
The facility failed to provide proper catheter care for residents, including not documenting required catheter changes and improper management of urinary drainage bags. A resident's suprapubic catheter was not changed as ordered, and two residents with foley catheters had drainage bags improperly positioned, violating infection control policies.
The facility failed to label and manage multi-dose insulin and Tuberculin solution properly, leading to expired medications on the Gold and Red Units. Observations showed insulin pens and vials without opened dates, and an expired insulin vial. Staff confirmed these should have been labeled and discarded per policy.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary operations and food safety standards in the main kitchen and a pantry. In the kitchen, cake-like squares were unlabeled, and vents and food disposal were unclean. In the pantry, food items lacked labels, ice packs were stored with food, and temperature logs were incomplete. The Dietary Manager and Assistant DON confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility failed to maintain a clean environment in a resident's room and did not ensure a resident's wheelchair was clean. Observations revealed food items and empty bottles on the floor of a room, and food-like substances on a resident's wheelchair cushion and frame. The NHA confirmed these issues, which were contrary to the facility's policy for a clean and homelike environment.
A facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen therapy for a resident with COPD, dementia, and high blood pressure. The resident was observed using oxygen on multiple occasions, but their clinical records lacked a physician's order. An LPN confirmed this deficiency during an interview.
The facility failed to provide written notice of the bed-hold policy to two residents or their representatives upon or within twenty-four hours of hospital transfer. This deficiency was confirmed through a review of clinical records and staff interviews, revealing that the required documentation was missing for both residents.
The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for a resident with dementia, prostate cancer, and high blood pressure, who was discharged after their spouse informed the facility of their non-return. The absence of this documentation was confirmed by a Regional Nurse Consultant.
The facility failed to meet the required nurse aide (NA) staffing ratios on multiple occasions across different shifts. During the day shift, the facility was understaffed on two days, with fewer NAs working than required for the resident census. The evening and overnight shifts also experienced staffing shortages, with the overnight shift particularly affected on 11 out of 21 days reviewed. These deficiencies were confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility did not meet the required LPN staffing ratio on a day shift, with only 3.00 LPNs present for 77 residents, falling short of the 3.80 LPNs required. This deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility did not meet the required 3.2 hours of direct nursing care per resident per day on three occasions, with nursing care hours recorded as 2.84, 2.98, and 3.19 hours. This was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility did not maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the Red shower room, where black and gray substances were observed on the ceramic tiles. The cleaning policy requires regular cleaning with disinfectant, but a housekeeper could not confirm the last cleaning date, and the facility lacked evidence of recent cleaning. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the issue.
Failure to Transcribe Admission Lithium Order and Address Pharmacy Alert Leading to Psychiatric Decompensation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow nursing standards of practice and accurately transcribe and implement admission medication orders for a newly admitted resident, resulting in the omission of a prescribed psychotropic medication. Pennsylvania Code Title 49 requires RNs to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore well-being and to be fully responsible and accountable for the quality of care delivered. Facility policies required clarification and transcription of newly prescribed medications onto the MAR or into the electronic MAR, implementation of written transfer orders unless unclear or incomplete, and acting upon and documenting pharmacist recommendations. The RN job description required delivery of care using the nursing process while maintaining professional standards. The resident, admitted with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, Parkinson’s disease, and major depressive disorder, had transfer orders that included lithium carbonate 300 mg extended-release orally with no stop date. On admission, the facility’s physician orders dated the same day did not include the lithium carbonate 300 mg order, and the resident’s MARs for the subsequent period showed no evidence that this medication was ordered or administered. A pharmacy admission medication review identified a potential clinically significant irregularity, noting that the lithium carbonate 150 mg dose fell below the recommended daily dose and was potentially subtherapeutic, but there was no evidence that this review was addressed by facility staff or the physician. Documentation from the resident’s last behavioral health visit prior to admission showed active orders for both lithium carbonate 150 mg daily and 300 mg daily, indicating that the higher dose should have been part of the resident’s regimen. Following admission, the resident’s clinical record documented escalating behavioral and psychiatric symptoms over multiple days, including pacing, wandering, screaming, yelling, loud and unusual religious statements, hitting staff, increased anxiety, arguments with other residents, and repeated administration of anti-anxiety medications. Progress notes described manic behavior, flight of ideas, talking to self and to people not present, delusional thoughts, agitation, disruptive behavior in common areas, lack of sleep, and the need for one-on-one care due to mania. The resident experienced falls and was noted to be confused, disoriented, and in a manic state. Laboratory results showed a lithium level of 0.14 mmol/L, below the referenced normal range of 0.60–1.20 mmol/L, and a neurology progress note stated that the resident’s lithium doses were not correctly dosed and that the resident was showing signs of active psychosis. In interviews, the DON confirmed that the lithium carbonate 300 mg order from the transfer orders was not transcribed into the facility medication record and that the pharmacy admission medication review identifying a potential clinically significant irregularity was not addressed by facility staff or the physician. The resident’s care plans included a plan for risk of adverse effects related to antipsychotic medication, with a goal of no side effects, and a plan for risk of behavioral symptoms related to schizoaffective disorder with an intervention to administer medications per physician order. Despite these care plans, the lithium carbonate 300 mg order was not implemented because it was never transcribed into the electronic medical record or MAR, and the pharmacy’s alert about a potentially subtherapeutic lithium dose was not acted upon. The facility’s failure to accurately transcribe the admission medication orders and to respond to the pharmacist’s identified irregularity created a situation that surveyors determined placed the resident in Immediate Jeopardy of the likelihood of serious bodily injury, harm, or death.
Removal Plan
- All Registered Nurses will receive education regarding the proper process for entering physician orders for new admissions, including thorough review of hospital discharge orders, accurate entry of orders into the electronic health record, and the required process for transcription and clarification to ensure accuracy within the medical record.
- Nursing staff will utilize a standard Medication Transcription/Clarification Tool during the admission process to ensure all medication orders are completely and accurately transcribed.
- Any discrepancies identified will be clarified with the physician prior to implementation, and physicians will be notified promptly of any transcription error or clarification needs.
- Implement a revised admission process requiring use of the Medication Transcription/Clarification Tool to validate that medication orders are accurately entered into the electronic health record and appropriately populate in the electronic medication administration record.
- Director of Nursing or designee will audit admissions to verify accuracy of order transcription and clarification.
- Admission audits will be conducted until sustained compliance is achieved.
- Audit results will be reviewed at the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement meetings and additional corrective action or re-education will be implemented as indicated by audit findings.
Failure to Transcribe and Administer Ordered Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors related to a psychotropic medication. Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Section 21.11, which outlines RN responsibilities for promoting, maintaining, and restoring well-being and being accountable for the quality of care delivered, was cited. Facility policies titled "Medication and Treatment Orders" and "Medication Errors" required that newly prescribed medications, including written transfer orders from other health care facilities, be clarified if unclear and transcribed onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or electronic MAR, and that medications be administered according to physician orders. Review of the clinical record for Resident R1, admitted on 1/8/26 with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, Parkinson’s disease, and major depressive disorder, showed that the facility’s physician orders dated 1/8/26 did not include an order for lithium 300 mg extended-release orally, despite this medication being present on the transfer orders. As a result, the resident did not receive lithium carbonate 300 mg from 1/8/26 through 2/8/26. During an interview, the DON confirmed that the lithium order from the transfer documentation was not transcribed into the resident’s medication record, was not clarified with the physician, and therefore was not administered as ordered.
Failure of NHA and DON Oversight Leading to Inaccurate Admission Medication Transcription
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the failure of the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) to effectively manage the facility so that admission medications are transcribed accurately. Review of facility records and job descriptions showed that the NHA’s primary purpose is to supervise clinical and administrative affairs, including overseeing staff, personal and financial matters, medical care, medical supplies, and facilities, while the DON’s primary purpose is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operations of the clinical department in accordance with regulatory standards to ensure quality care. Despite these defined responsibilities, survey findings identified that the facility failed to ensure accurate transcription of admission medications, demonstrating that the NHA and DON did not fulfill their essential job duties to ensure compliance with Federal and State guidelines and regulations, including 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a), 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1), and 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5).
Incomplete Medical Record Documentation for Deceased and Wound Care Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation in the medical records of four out of twelve residents reviewed. Specifically, for one resident who passed away, the clinical record did not include required details such as the date and time of death, the name and title of the individual pronouncing death, and the name of the person removing the deceased from the facility, as mandated by facility policy. The Director of Nursing confirmed these omissions during an interview. Additionally, three other residents with complex medical conditions, including brain cancer, stroke, diabetes, pressure ulcers, and amputations, had incomplete documentation of wound treatments and other ordered care. Multiple entries in their treatment administration records were left blank, indicating that the completion of prescribed treatments was not consistently recorded. The Director of Nursing also confirmed these gaps in documentation, which were contrary to the facility's policies requiring timely and accurate recording of all treatments and care provided.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Hygiene Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with bathing and personal hygiene for two residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living. According to facility policy and physician orders, one resident was to receive showers every Wednesday and Saturday, while another was to receive showers every Tuesday and Friday. Documentation and interviews revealed that both residents missed multiple scheduled showers, and their clinical records confirmed their need for assistance with personal care. During interviews, one resident expressed distress over not receiving showers as expected, noting greasy hair and feeling unkempt. Observations confirmed that both residents had greasy and unkempt hair at the time of the survey. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the residents had not received showers as ordered and confirmed their unkempt appearance. The facility's own policy required documentation of the date, time, and staff involved in providing showers or bed baths, but records showed missed care events. The deficiency was identified through review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, and direct observation, demonstrating a failure to provide necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for residents unable to perform these activities independently.
Plan Of Correction
1) Resident 3 and Resident 4 were showered, and shower documentation was completed. 2) Director of nursing or designee audited current residents to ensure showers are ordered correctly and documentation complete. 3) Director of nursing or designee educated current direct care staff on shower policy and documentation of showers. 4) Director of nursing or designee will audit 5 residents 3x per week for 2 weeks and then monthly to ensure shower offered/provided until compliance is met. Results of audits will be reviewed in QAPI each month until compliance is met. **UPDATE:** Audits will include documentation if refusal or change in schedule. Cognitively impaired residents will be visualized for cleanliness: hair, nails, general appearance.
Failure to Timely Obtain and Administer Prescribed Pain Medication
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to take timely and appropriate action to obtain and administer a prescribed medication for a resident. The facility's policies required that medications be administered safely and promptly as prescribed, and that medications be received from the pharmacy in a timely manner. Despite these policies, a resident who returned from the hospital with an order for morphine for pain and dyspnea did not receive the medication as needed upon readmission. The resident, who had diagnoses including palliative care, hypertension, and dementia, was documented as having significant pain and respiratory distress upon return to the facility. Nursing documentation indicated that the resident was non-responsive, had agonal breathing, and had received morphine prior to leaving the hospital. Pain assessments conducted after readmission showed observable signs of pain, including labored breathing and facial grimacing, with pain scores indicating moderate pain on two separate occasions. Despite the physician's order for morphine to be given as needed, the medication was not administered until the following morning, several hours after the resident's return. Staff interviews revealed that delays in obtaining a pull code for the controlled medication from the dispensing unit contributed to the delay, as the process required communication between the physician and pharmacist. The DON confirmed that the medication was not available or administered as ordered, despite documented pain and the resident's need for comfort measures.
Plan Of Correction
1) R1 received medication. 2) Director of nursing or designee audited current new residents admitted within the last 30 days with controlled substance orders to ensure no delay in medication administration and medication availability. 3) Director of nursing or designee educated Registered Nurses to receive pull code for controlled substances upon admission of new residents with narcotics. 4) Director of nursing or designee will audit new controlled substance orders for availability by either receiving pull code from emergency kit, having pharmacy perform stat run or utilizing a local back-up pharmacy to obtain medications, weekly for 2 weeks and then monthly until compliance is met. Results of audits will be reviewed in QAPI each month until compliance is met.
Failure to Provide Ordered Medication Due to Pharmacy Delay
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medication was obtained and provided as ordered by the physician for one resident. Specifically, a review of the clinical record for a resident with diagnoses including diabetes, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux disease showed a physician's order for caladryl external lotion to be applied topically to a rash twice daily for seven days. However, the treatment record for the relevant months did not contain evidence that the caladryl lotion was applied as ordered. Nursing documentation indicated that the facility was waiting for delivery of the caladryl lotion from the pharmacy, and there was no documentation that the medication was received or administered. The Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no evidence of receipt or application of the medication per the physician's order. Facility policies required medications to be administered according to prescriber orders and for the prescriber to be contacted if medication delivery would be delayed, but there was no documentation that these procedures were followed.
Plan Of Correction
1) Medical Director was made aware of R2 order and missed administration. Medical Director did not wish to order Caladryl based on current clinical presentation. 2) Director of nursing or designee audited not administered medication pass of current residents to ensure current medications are available to be administered, with no delay in medication administration. 3) Director of nursing or designee educated licensed staff on policy for ordering medications from pharmacy. 4) The Director of nursing or designee will audit medication administration records for missed doses, ensuring availability of medication 5 times per week for 2 weeks, and then monthly until compliance is met. Results of audits will be reviewed in QAPI each month until compliance is met. UPDATE: Education will include the path to follow if a medication is not available: Make RN aware, check MedBank, contact pharmacy, notify physician, follow physician orders, document, and notify family if applicable. Pharmacy does notify if a medication is unavailable.
Failure to Meet Minimum Nurse Aide Staffing Ratios
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the required minimum nurse aide (NA) to resident ratios on several occasions during the review period. Specifically, for the day shift, the facility did not provide the mandated one NA per 10 residents on four days, as staffing records showed fewer NAs scheduled than required based on the census. For the evening shift, the facility did not meet the one NA per 11 residents requirement on two days, again scheduling fewer NAs than needed. These findings were confirmed through a review of staffing documents and an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, who acknowledged the shortfalls on the identified dates and shifts. No information regarding the medical history or condition of individual residents at the time of the deficiency was provided in the report.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will provide staff to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility will produce a daily schedule to meet the required nurse aide to resident ratios on all shifts. The Director of Nursing or designee will provide re-education on minimum nurse aide staffing ratios to Registered Nurse Supervisors and Human Resources/Scheduling, who are responsible for maintaining adequate nurse aide staffing and nurse aide staffing ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate HR/Scheduler and RN supervisors on protocols for replacing staff related to call-offs, including mandating staff when replacement staff are unable to be found. The Director of Nursing or designee will meet 5 times per week for 4 weeks to audit the daily deployment sheet for accuracy to ensure the daily schedule meets nurse aide ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit the hours worked to ensure that the minimum number of nurse aide staff to resident ratios have been met, using the Department of Health staffing grid for 4 weeks. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit weekly that protocols were followed when a call-off occurred. This includes asking staff to stay, posting needs, posting needs with agencies, offering bonuses, and mandating staff when needed. The facility has ads posted on Indeed and recently increased our shift differential for nurse aides on second and third shifts, resulting in an increase in applications over the last two weeks. The results of these audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance and Process Improvement meetings until substantial compliance is achieved.
Failure to Meet Minimum LPN Staffing Ratios
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the required minimum staffing ratios for Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) across multiple shifts and days, as mandated by regulation effective July 1, 2023. Specifically, the facility did not provide the required number of LPNs per resident on the day shift for 11 out of 21 days reviewed, on the evening shift for one day, and on the overnight shift for four days. Staffing documents showed that on these dates, the number of LPNs scheduled and worked was consistently below the calculated requirement based on the facility's census for each shift. The deficiency was confirmed through a review of nursing staffing documents and an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, who acknowledged the shortfalls. The report details the specific census numbers and the corresponding LPN staffing levels for each deficient shift, demonstrating that the facility did not meet the mandated LPN-to-resident ratios on multiple occasions during the review period.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will provide staff to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility will produce a daily schedule to meet the required licensed practical nurse to resident ratios on all shifts. The Director of Nursing or designee will provide re-education on minimum licensed practical nurse staffing ratios to Registered Nurse Supervisors and Human Resources/Scheduling, who are responsible for maintaining adequate staffing and licensed practical nurse staffing ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate HR/Scheduler and RN supervisors on protocols for replacing staff related to call-offs, including mandating staff when replacement staff are unable to be found. The Director of Nursing or designee will meet 5 days per week for 4 weeks to audit the daily deployment sheet for accuracy to ensure the daily schedule meets licensed practical nurse ratio. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit the hours worked to ensure that the minimum number of licensed practical nurse staff to resident ratios have been met, using the Department of Health staffing grid for 4 weeks. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit weekly that protocols were followed when a call-off occurred. This includes asking staff to stay, posting need, posting need with agencies, offering bonus, and mandating when needed. The facility has ads posted on Indeed and has recently advertised our shift differential for licensed practical nurses on second and third shifts, with an increase in applications over the last two weeks. The results of these audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance and Process Improvement meetings until substantial compliance is achieved.
Failure to Meet Minimum Nursing Care Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care per resident per day over a 24-hour period on three specific days during the review period. Review of nursing staffing documents showed that on these dates, the provided hours of care per patient day (PPD) were 3.16, 3.19, and 3.17, all below the regulatory minimum. This deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator during an interview, who acknowledged that the facility did not meet the mandated staffing levels on the identified dates. No additional information regarding the medical history or condition of specific residents was provided in the report.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will provide staff to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility will produce a daily schedule to at least meet the required 3.2 minimum general nursing care per patient day hour requirement. The Director of Nursing or designee will provide re-education on minimum general nursing care staffing hours to Registered Nurse Supervisors and Human Resources/Scheduling who are responsible to maintain adequate general nursing care staffing hours. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate HR/Scheduler and RN supervisors of protocols for replacing staff related to call offs, including mandating staff when replacement staff are unable to be found. The Director of Nursing or designee will meet 5 days per week for 4 weeks to audit the daily deployment sheet for accuracy to ensure the daily schedule meets minimum general nursing care staffing PPD. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit the hours worked to ensure that the minimum number of general nursing care staff hours have been met using the Department of Health staffing grid for 4 weeks. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit weekly that protocols were followed when a call off occurred. This includes asking staff to stay, posting need, posting need with agencies, offering bonus, and mandating when needed. The results of these audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance and Process Improvement meetings until substantial compliance is achieved.
Failure to Employ Qualified Dietitian or Provide Required Consultation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietitian or ensure that the employee designated as the director of food and nutrition services received frequent consultations from a qualified dietitian. Review of the director's credentials revealed a lack of appropriate competencies and skills, including the absence of certification for food service management, a relevant degree, or sufficient experience and completed coursework in food safety and management. There was no evidence of a dietitian functioning as a consultant for the director. Interviews with the DON and NHA confirmed that the facility has not had a dietitian on a full-time, part-time, or consulting basis since the change in ownership.
Failure to Complete Required Nutritional Assessments for At-Risk Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately and consistently assess the nutritional status of residents upon admission and as needed thereafter, as required by its own policy and regulatory standards. Specifically, the facility did not complete comprehensive nutritional assessments for 27 out of 85 residents reviewed, all of whom were identified as being at risk for unplanned weight loss or compromised nutritional status. The facility's policy required a dietitian to complete a comprehensive nutritional assessment within seventy-two hours of admission, annually, and upon significant change in condition, but there was no evidence that these assessments were performed for the identified residents. Clinical records for multiple residents showed a lack of documented nutritional assessments both at admission and during their stay, despite the presence of significant medical conditions such as high blood pressure, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, COPD, diabetes, dementia, and other serious diagnoses. For example, one resident experienced a significant weight loss and developed new pressure ulcers, yet there was no evidence of a nutritional assessment being completed at any point. This pattern was consistent across all identified residents, regardless of their specific medical histories or changes in condition. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and the NHA, confirmed that the facility had been without a dietitian on a full-time, part-time, or consulting basis since a specific date. As a result, no nutritional assessments were completed for any residents from that time forward. The lack of a dietitian and the absence of required assessments directly contributed to the deficiency, as the facility was unable to ensure that residents' nutritional needs were being properly evaluated and addressed.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident who was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including high blood pressure, pneumonia, and unstageable pressure ulcers on the right heel and sacrum. The facility's policy requires that a comprehensive assessment be conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans, identifying current interventions and treatments, and linking these to the problems and diagnoses being treated. Despite the presence of physician orders for wound treatments and weekly wound care consultant assessments, there was no evidence in the clinical record that a care plan addressing the resident's skin integrity impairment and pressure ulcers had been developed. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that a care plan for the resident's pressure ulcers had not been created. The lack of a care plan was identified through a review of the clinical record, facility policy, and staff interviews, and was found to be non-compliant with state regulations regarding the responsibility of the licensee and nursing services.
Failure to Timely Review and Revise Resident Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and/or revise care plans within the required timeframes for seven out of fifteen residents reviewed. Facility policy requires that comprehensive assessments and care plans be developed, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals, with interventions monitored and adjusted as needed. However, clinical record reviews revealed that multiple residents had care plans with outstanding target dates, indicating they were not updated as required. For example, one resident had 37 out of 39 care plans with overdue target dates, and another had all 15 care plans overdue. Interviews with the DON and RN Assessment Coordinator confirmed these care plans were not reviewed or revised within the mandated periods. Additionally, deficiencies were found in the content of the care plans themselves. Some care plans lacked essential components such as goals and interventions. For instance, one resident's care plans for actual skin breakdown and safety had no goals, while another resident had four care plans with no goals or interventions, covering areas such as discharge potential and infection. Another resident's care plan for enhanced barrier precautions lacked any interventions. These omissions were confirmed by staff interviews. The residents affected had a range of complex medical conditions, including diabetes, high blood pressure, anxiety, COPD, osteoporosis, osteomyelitis, metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure, DVT, urinary tract infection, and dementia. The failure to timely review, revise, and complete care plans for these residents was identified through record review and staff interviews, and was cited under state regulations for responsibility of the licensee and nursing services.
Overnight Nurse Aide Staffing Shortage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the required nurse aide (NA) staffing ratios during the overnight shift on one of the 21 days reviewed. Specifically, on January 13, 2025, the facility had a census of 74 residents, which required 4.93 NAs to meet the mandated ratio of one NA per 15 residents. However, only 4.53 NAs were on duty, resulting in a staffing shortage. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 3, 2025, who acknowledged that the facility did not meet the minimum NA ratio for the specified date and shift.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will provide staff to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility will produce a daily schedule to meet the required nurse aide to resident ratios on all shifts. The facility will also utilize licensed staff when needed to fulfill the aide need. The Director of Nursing or designee will provide re-education on minimum nurse aide staffing ratios to Registered Nurse Supervisors and Human Resources/Scheduling who are responsible for maintaining adequate nurse aide staffing and nurse aide staffing ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate HR/Scheduler and RN supervisors of protocols for replacing staff related to call-offs, including mandating staff when replacement staff are unable to be found. The facility shall also utilize licensed staff to help fill the CNA openings when able. The Director of Nursing or designee will meet 5x per week for 4 weeks to audit the daily deployment sheet for accuracy to ensure the daily schedule meets nurse aide ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit the hours worked to ensure that the minimum number of nurse aide staff to resident ratios have been met using the Department of Health staffing grid for 4 weeks. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit weekly that protocols were followed when a call-off occurred. This includes asking staff to stay, asking licensed staff to stay, posting need, posting need with agencies, offering bonuses, and mandating when needed. The facility has ads posted on Indeed and recently increased our shift differential for nurse aides on second and third shifts, resulting in an increase in applications over the last six weeks. The results of these audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance and Process Improvement meetings until substantial compliance is achieved.
Failure to Implement Safety Measures for Wheelchair Transport and Fall Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement adequate safety measures related to wheelchair transport and fall precautions for two residents. Resident R13, who had a history of stroke, Parkinson's Disease, and required assistance to propel a wheelchair, was involved in an incident where they were being pushed in a wheelchair without footrests attached. This led to the resident losing balance, falling, and sustaining an injury that required hospital admission. The facility did not have a policy for staff on the safe use of footrests during wheelchair transport, contributing to the incident. Resident R14, diagnosed with prostate and bone cancer and cognitive communication deficit, had a physician's order for a pressure alarm when in bed. However, during an incident, the pressure alarm was not plugged in, resulting in the resident falling, sustaining a head injury, and becoming unresponsive. The lack of a functioning alarm system meant that staff were not alerted in time to prevent the fall. These deficiencies highlight the facility's failure to ensure proper safety measures and supervision to prevent accidents.
Plan Of Correction
R13 and R14 have both returned to us from the hospital. Resident 13's wheelchair has wheelchair footrests. Resident 14 has orders for a bed alarm to check placement and function every shift. Current residents that utilized a wheelchair for mobility were verified that they have wheelchair footrests. Current residents that have bed or chair alarms orders were verified that they have current orders for check placement and function of alarms every shift. A wheelchair mobility procedure was developed for resident transportation. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate staff, including agency staff, on footrest usage with transporting residents in wheelchairs, as well as checking that all bed/chair alarms are plugged in and active prior to leaving a resident's room. Staff will be educated that residents will have orders for alarms, and staff will also check placement and function every shift, as well as verifying the alarm is active prior to leaving the resident unsupervised. Audits will be completed to ensure all residents being transferred in a wheelchair have footrests in use when assisting residents with mobility, as well as audits to ensure alarms in use are plugged in and active. These audits will be completed on 5 residents, 3 times a week for 2 weeks, and then monthly until cleared by Quality Assurance.
Failure to Report Incidents to DOH
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) field office of reportable incidents/accidents involving four residents. Resident R9, admitted with a stroke and left-sided paralysis, rolled out of bed and was sent to the emergency room for a hip evaluation. Resident R13, with a history of stroke and Parkinson's Disease, fell while being pushed in a wheelchair, resulting in a hospital admission. Resident R14, diagnosed with prostate and bone cancer, fell and was found unresponsive with a head injury, necessitating emergency department evaluation. Resident R15, suffering from dementia and Alzheimer's Disease, sustained a head injury from a fall in the dining room and was also sent to the emergency room. The facility's documentation and clinical records lacked evidence of these incidents being reported to the DOH field office, as required by regulation 51.3 (g)(1-14). During an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the failure to report these incidents. This oversight represents a deficiency in the facility's compliance with state notification requirements, potentially compromising patient safety and quality assurance.
Plan Of Correction
The incidents involving R9, R13, R14, and R15 will be reported to Pennsylvania Department of Health Electronic Reporting system. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct a look back of past 30 day transfers, and if any transfer is identified as a result of an incident or accident, it will be reported to the Department of Health electronic reporting system. Education was provided to the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator on reportable events and criteria for reporting by the Regional Director of Clinical Services. All incidents will be reviewed in the Morning Meeting to determine if they meet the requirements for reporting to the Department of Health. Audits will be conducted to determine if an incident is a Department of Health reportable incident by the Director of Nursing or the Nursing Home Administrator on all incidents for 2 weeks, and then 5 incidents weekly until cleared by Quality Assurance.
Deficiency in Corridor Door Latching
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain corridor doors as required by regulations, specifically for one of over fifty corridor doors. During an observation on December 10, 2024, at 11:35 a.m., it was noted that the door to resident room 505 on the first floor did not have positive latching. This deficiency was identified through direct observation by the surveyors. The maintenance supervisor confirmed the deficiency during an interview conducted at the same time as the observation. The lack of positive latching on the corridor door is a violation of the requirements that ensure doors resist the passage of smoke and maintain safety standards within the facility.
Plan Of Correction
The door to room 505 was fixed immediately. All doors on A hall were checked and all passed. Education provided to maintenance as well as all staff on the importance of checking doors latching and process to report if it does not. Maintenance director or designee will audit 5 doors a week times 2 weeks and then weekly until cleared by quality assurance.
Failure to Address Advance Directives for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comprehensively address the formulation of advance directives for two residents, leading to a deficiency in honoring residents' rights to make informed decisions about their medical care. Resident R36, who was admitted with diagnoses including pervasive developmental disorder, unspecified psychosis, difficulty speaking, and dementia with agitation, was identified as a Full Code. However, the facility did not have evidence of a POLST or advance directive in the resident's clinical record, nor was there documentation of discussions or assistance offered regarding advance directives. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed the absence of these critical documents in the resident's record. Similarly, Resident R4, admitted with diagnoses of dementia, hyperlipidemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, had an order for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) but lacked evidence of being provided with written information or assistance in formulating advance directives. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of such documentation in Resident R4's clinical record. These findings indicate a failure to adhere to the facility's policy on advance directives, which requires providing residents with information and assistance in formulating their medical care preferences.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident 36 and Resident 4 responsible parties were notified and reviewed Advance directive option. Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) were completed for both residents and physician and families notified. 2. Current resident records were reviewed to ensure that current residents have a code status and a current POLST of their wishes for healthcare. 3. Director of Nursing or designee will provide education to licensed nurses and the social worker on the advance directive policy and the completion of advanced directives on admission. 4. Director of Nursing will audit admissions to ensure that current residents have a code status including a current POLST. Audits will be completed 3 times weekly for 2 weeks then Monthly until compliance is met. Audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance meetings monthly until compliance is met.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders for Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician's orders for three residents, leading to deficiencies in care. Resident R69, who had a history of stroke, breast cancer, and high blood pressure, was observed multiple times without the prescribed left arm sling and soft cervical collar, which were ordered to be worn at all times except for specific activities. The Regional Nurse Consultant confirmed the non-compliance with the physician's orders during an interview. Resident R17, diagnosed with hypothyroidism and hyperlipidemia, did not have a scheduled dermatology appointment as ordered by the physician for a skin rash. The appointment was canceled due to COVID, and there was no evidence of rescheduling. The Director of Nursing confirmed the failure to schedule the Telederm appointment. Additionally, Resident R65, with hemiplegia and hypertension, was observed without the required contracture boot on the right foot/ankle on several occasions, despite physician orders and care plan interventions. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of the boot, acknowledging the failure to adhere to the physician's orders.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident R69 was addressed immediately to ensure sling and collar were on and Dr. notified. R17 order for the telehealth visit was discontinued as per physician. R65 order for boot was discontinued after consultation with therapy as it was deemed it was no longer necessary for the patient. 2. Director of Nursing or designee will audit 5 residents weekly for three weeks to review physician orders are being followed. Redline process, review of all new orders, discontinued orders, labs and appointments, will be put into place for third shift supervisor to review all new orders and discontinued orders daily. 3. Director of Nursing or designee will educate Licensed staff and certified nursing aids on Verbal physician care orders and physician orders. Reviewed with staff on where to see orders/tasks for residents and to ensure those measures are in place for each resident. 4. Audits of 5 residents per week x 3 weeks on care orders and appointments to ensure they are active and in place. Audits will be completed 5 residents per week x 3 weeks and monthly until cleared by quality assurance meeting.
Failure to Apply Prescribed Hand Splint for Resident with Hemiplegia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received the necessary treatment and services to prevent further decline. Resident R65, who has hemiplegia, was observed multiple times without the prescribed resting hand splint on their left hand, despite a sign in the room indicating it should be worn during the day. The resident and their significant other confirmed that the splint was not being applied, and the resident expressed discomfort due to their fingers pushing into their hand. Interviews with the Director of Rehab and the Director of Nursing revealed that the resident was discharged from therapy with a goal to wear the hand splint for eight hours daily. However, the process to incorporate these goals into the resident's care plan was not effectively followed, as evidenced by the repeated observations of the resident without the splint. The Director of Nursing confirmed the oversight, acknowledging that the splint should have been applied daily.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #65 had therapy eval completed to ensure that resident required hand splint. Physician and family were updated with recommendations. 2. Current residents with hand splints were reviewed to ensure that orders were current and equipment available and staff were applying the splint. 3. Director of Nursing or designee will educate licensed staff and certified nurse aides on splints/adaptive equipment. Reviewed with staff on where to see orders/tasks for residents with splints/adaptive equipment. 4. Audits of residents with hand splints will be completed to ensure that residents have the splints on as per ordered and proper documentation supporting the wearing of those splints. Audits will be completed 3x weekly for 2 weeks then monthly until compliance is met. Audits will be reviewed at quality assurance meetings monthly until compliance is met.
Deficiencies in Catheter Care and Infection Control
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for residents with urinary catheters, as evidenced by deficiencies in catheter maintenance and infection control practices. For one resident with a suprapubic catheter, the facility did not document the required monthly catheter and bag changes in April, June, and November 2024, as ordered by the physician. This lack of documentation was confirmed by the Regional Nurse Consultant, indicating a failure to adhere to physician orders and facility policy regarding catheter care. Additionally, two other residents with foley catheters were observed with improper catheter management. One resident's urinary drainage bag was found lying on the floor without a cover, with the drainage valve touching the floor, which was confirmed by the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) as inappropriate. Another resident's foley catheter drainage bag was observed hanging off the wheelchair armrest, positioned higher than the bladder, which was also confirmed by the RNAC as incorrect placement. These observations highlight a failure to maintain unobstructed urine flow and proper infection control measures as per facility policy.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #1 suprapubic catheter was last changed on 10/11/2024. Physician was notified that suprapubic catheter was not changed as per order in April, June, and November. No ill effects occurred due to catheter not being changed. Resident #5 foley was immediately put in a basin so it didn't touch the floor. Resident #11 foley was repositioned to ensure it was positioned below the bladder. 2. Current residents with foley/suprapubic catheters were reviewed to ensure that catheters were being changed as per physician orders, that catheter bags were not on the floor, and to ensure that catheter bags were positioned below the bladder to prevent back flow of urine. 3. Director of Nursing or designee will provide education to Licensed staff and Certified Nurse Aides on Catheter care policy and the Supra pubic catheter policy. She will educate on following physician orders for catheter changes, ensuring that the catheter bags are not on the floor, and that the staff must position the catheter below the bladder to prevent back flow of urine. 4. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit to ensure that all catheters are changed per physician order, the foley is not on the floor, and that the catheter bag is positioned appropriately. Audits will be completed on all catheters 3x weekly for 2 weeks then monthly until compliance is met. Audits will be reviewed at quality assurance meetings monthly until compliance is met.
Deficiency in Medication Labeling and Expiration Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly label and manage multi-dose containers of insulin and Tuberculin solution, leading to deficiencies in medication storage and expiration management. Observations revealed that insulin pens and vials on the Gold and Red Units' medication carts were not labeled with the date they were opened, making it impossible to determine their discard dates. Additionally, an opened multi-dose vial of insulin was found to be expired by five days. Staff interviews confirmed that these items should have been labeled with the opened date to ensure proper discard timing. Further observations in the Red Unit medication room identified an opened multi-dose vial of Tuberculin solution that was expired by seven days. Staff confirmed that this vial should have been discarded according to the facility's policy, which requires opened vials to be labeled with the date opened and a new expiration date. The failure to adhere to these policies resulted in the presence of expired medications in the facility, which was confirmed by staff interviews.
Plan Of Correction
Medication carts were immediately audited to ensure that any multidose vials of insulin, insulin pens, or Tuberculin solutions were dated with open date and that they had not expired since open per manufacturer guidelines. The Director of nursing or designee will educate licensed staff on medication storage policy and insulin policy to ensure that staff understands they have to date multidose insulin vials, insulin pens, and Tuberculin solutions when opened and they have to follow manufacturer guidelines of when it expires and not to be used after that date. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit all medication carts to ensure that insulin vials, insulin pens, and TB solution is dated with an open date and not used beyond expire date. Audits will be completed on 1 cart a day 3x weekly for 2 weeks then monthly until compliance is met. Audits will be reviewed at quality assurance meetings monthly until compliance is met.
Sanitation and Food Safety Deficiencies in Kitchen and Pantry
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary operations and food safety standards in the main kitchen and a pantry, as observed during a survey. In the main kitchen, a metal container with cake-like squares was found without labels or dates, and the heating units' vents had a thick layer of gray fuzzy substance. Additionally, the food disposal under the sink was covered with a thick layer of dry brown substance. The Dietary Manager confirmed these observations, acknowledging that the cake-like items should have been labeled and dated, and the vents and food disposal should have been clean. In the Gold Pantry, a refrigerator contained food items on a paper plate and in a ziplock bag without names or dates, and an open bottle of Pepsi also lacked labeling. The freezer contained an open half-gallon container of ice cream without a name or date, and ice packs used for resident treatments were stored with food. Temperature logs for the refrigerator and freezer were incomplete, missing entries for several days in November and entirely for December. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed these deficiencies, noting that food items should be labeled and dated, ice packs should not be stored with food, and temperatures should be logged daily.
Plan Of Correction
1. All items found without dates were immediately disposed of. All other pantries/refrigerators were checked for undated items as well as non-dietary items. The heating unit vents were inspected and cleaned the same day. The food disposal under the sink was cleaned the same day. The pantry refrigerator was cleaned of all items that were not labeled and dated. All refrigerators were temped and new temperature logs were put in place. 2. All refrigerators have been checked for temperature logs as well as proper labeling. 3. Nursing Home Administrator or designee will educate whole house on Food Labeling and Dating, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, and Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces. Education also includes that the dietary manager or designee will temp and log all refrigerator temps daily. 4. Nursing Home Administrator or designee will audit to ensure the heater vents and disposal to ensure clean as well as all refrigerators, in the kitchen and the pantries, to ensure food is labeled including date. These will also be audited to ensure no non-dietary items are in the refrigerators. Refrigerator temperature logs will also be audited. The kitchen will be audited to ensure all unrefrigerated items are labeled and dated as well. These audits will be performed 1 refrigerator and the kitchen a day 3 times a week for 2 weeks then monthly until compliance is met. Audits will be reviewed at quality assurance meetings monthly until compliance is met.
Failure to Maintain Clean Environment and Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in one resident room and failed to provide clean equipment for one resident. Observations in room 520 revealed multiple instances of food items and empty beverage bottles on the floor, which were confirmed by a visitor and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) as inappropriate. The facility's policy on maintaining a homelike environment requires a clean, sanitary, and orderly setting, which was not adhered to in this case. Additionally, Resident R37 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with food-like substances stuck to the cushion and frame over several days. The NHA confirmed the presence of these substances and acknowledged that the wheelchair and cushion should have been clean. Resident R37's clinical record indicated diagnoses of anxiety, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, but the report focused on the cleanliness of the resident's equipment rather than their medical conditions.
Plan Of Correction
1. Room 520 was picked up at the time of notification and was cleaned the same day. R37's wheelchair was cleaned the same day. 2. Nursing Home Administrator or designee will educate all housekeeping staff to ensure the policy and procedure is followed when cleaning resident rooms and wheelchairs. 3. Nursing Home Administrator or designee will educate all housekeeping staff on "Daily Resident/Patient Room Cleaning" and "Quality of Life-Homelike Environment." Staff will date and sign the task checklist daily. 4. The Administrator or designee will audit 5 resident rooms and wheelchairs for cleanliness and signed daily task checklists 3 x week x 2 weeks, 2 x week x 2 weeks, and weekly x 2 weeks. Findings will be discussed at our monthly Quality Assurance meeting and changes will be made if necessary.
Failure to Obtain Physician's Order for Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the provision of oxygen therapy for a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, and high blood pressure. The resident was observed using an oxygen nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator delivering 2 liters per minute on multiple occasions. The clinical records indicated the resident utilized oxygen on several dates, but there was no evidence of a physician's order for this therapy. A Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed the absence of a physician's order during an interview.
Plan Of Correction
1. Obtained an order for oxygen for resident #26. Oxygen at 2 liter as needed. Responsible party was notified of order. 2. Current residents that are using oxygen were reviewed to determine they had orders for oxygen therapy in electronic medical record. 3. Director of Nursing or designee educated License staff on the respiratory policy. Nurses educated that residents must have an order for oxygen therapy. 4. Director of Nursing or designee will audit all residents to ensure that residents using oxygen therapy have orders for oxygen in electronic medical record. Audits will be completed 3 x weekly for 2 weeks then monthly until compliance is met. Audits will be reviewed at quality assurance meeting monthly until compliance is met.
Failure to Provide Bed-Hold Policy Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notice of the bed-hold policy to residents or their representatives upon or within twenty-four hours of transfer to a hospital. This deficiency was identified for two residents, R52 and R72, during a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews. The facility's policy, titled "Bed-Hold Notification - Pennsylvania," requires that residents or their responsible parties be offered the choice to hold the resident's bed when a transfer to the hospital is necessary. Resident R52, who was admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and high blood pressure, was transferred to the hospital, but there was no evidence in the clinical record that the bed-hold policy was provided. Similarly, Resident R72, with diagnoses including dementia, prostate cancer, and high blood pressure, was also transferred to the hospital without evidence of receiving the bed-hold policy. Interviews with the Regional Nurse Consultant confirmed the lack of documentation for both residents.
Missing Discharge Summary for Discharged Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the completion of a discharge summary for a resident, identified as CR72, who was discharged from the facility. Resident CR72 was admitted on 3/12/24 with diagnoses including dementia, prostate cancer, and high blood pressure. On 10/08/24, the resident's spouse informed the facility that Resident CR72 would not be returning. However, upon review of the closed clinical record, it was found that there was no discharge summary documenting the resident's stay and course of treatment. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant on 12/05/24.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident R72's discharge summary was opened and completed. 2. The last 10 closed charts will be audited for discharge summaries. All closed charts will be reviewed going forward to ensure discharge summary is in the closed file. 3. Nursing Home Administrator or designee will educate Interdisciplinary Team, which includes medical records, on discharge summaries to ensure that staff understands they have to be completed on all discharged residents and in the file prior to closing. 4. Nursing Home Administrator or designee will audit to ensure discharge summaries are included in closed charts. Audits will be completed on all discharged residents for 2 weeks then monthly until compliance is met. Audits will be reviewed at quality assurance meetings monthly until compliance is met.
Facility Fails to Meet Nurse Aide Staffing Ratios
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the required nurse aide (NA) staffing ratios as mandated by the regulation effective July 1, 2024. Specifically, the facility did not maintain the required NA-to-resident ratios on several occasions across different shifts. During the day shift, the facility was understaffed on two days, with fewer NAs working than required for the resident census. On November 5, 2024, with a census of 78 residents, only 6.86 NAs worked when 7.80 were required. Similarly, on December 1, 2024, with a census of 77 residents, 7.20 NAs worked when 7.70 were required. The evening and overnight shifts also experienced staffing shortages. On November 29, 2024, during the evening shift, the facility had a census of 76 residents but only 4.80 NAs worked when 6.91 were required. The overnight shift was particularly affected, with staffing shortages on 11 out of 21 days reviewed. For instance, on November 8, 2024, with a census of 76 residents, only 4.26 NAs worked when 5.07 were required. These deficiencies were confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 5, 2024.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will provide staff to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility will produce a daily schedule to meet the required nurse aide to resident ratios on all shifts. The Director of Nursing or designee will provide re-education on minimum nurse aide staffing ratios to Registered Nurse Supervisors and Human Resources/Scheduling who are responsible to maintain adequate nurse aide staffing and nurse aide staffing ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate HR/Scheduler and RN supervisors of protocols for replacing staff related to call offs, including mandating staff when replacement staff are unable to be found. The Director of Nursing or designee will meet 5x per week for 4 weeks to audit the daily deployment sheet for accuracy to ensure the daily schedule meets nurse aide ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit the hours worked to ensure that the minimum number of nurse aide staff to resident ratios have been met using the Department of Health staffing grid for 4 weeks. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit weekly that protocols were followed when a call off occurred. This includes asking staff to stay, posting need, posting need with agencies, offering bonuses, and mandating when needed. The facility has ads posted on Indeed and recently increased our shift differential for nurse aides on second and third shift, resulting in an increase in applications over the last two weeks. The results of these audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance and Process Improvement meetings until substantial compliance is achieved.
LPN Staffing Ratio Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the required Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) staffing ratio on the day shift for one of the 21 days reviewed. Specifically, on December 1, 2024, the facility had a census of 77 residents but only staffed 3.00 LPNs, whereas 3.80 LPNs were required to meet the regulatory ratio of one LPN per 25 residents. This deficiency was identified through a review of the facility's nursing staffing documents covering several time periods, and it was confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 5, 2024, at 9:10 a.m.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will provide staff to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility will produce a daily schedule to meet the required licensed practical nurse to resident ratios on all shifts. The Director of Nursing or designee will provide re-education on minimum licensed practical nurse staffing ratios to Registered Nurse Supervisors and Human Resources/Scheduling who are responsible to maintain adequate staffing and licensed practical nurse staffing ratios. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate HR/Scheduler and RN supervisors of protocols for replacing staff related to call offs, including mandating staff when replacement staff are unable to be found. The Director of Nursing or designee will meet 5 days per week for 4 weeks to audit the daily deployment sheet for accuracy to ensure the daily schedule meets the licensed practical nurse ratio. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit the hours worked to ensure that the minimum number of licensed practical nurse staff to resident ratios have been met using the Department of Health staffing grid for 4 weeks. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit weekly that protocols were followed when a call off occurred. This includes asking staff to stay, posting need, posting need with agencies, offering bonuses, and mandating when needed. The facility has ads posted on Indeed and is recently advertising our shift differential for licensed practical nurses on second and third shift, with an increase in applications over the last two weeks. The results of these audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance and Process Improvement meetings until substantial compliance is achieved.
Deficiency in Meeting Minimum Nursing Care Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the regulatory requirement of providing a minimum of 3.2 hours of direct nursing care per resident per day over a 24-hour period. This deficiency was identified during a review of the facility's nursing staffing documents and confirmed through staff interviews. Specifically, on three separate days, the facility's nursing care hours fell below the required minimum: 2.84 hours on one day, 2.98 hours on another, and 3.19 hours on a third day. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the shortfall in meeting the mandated nursing care hours on these dates.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will provide staff to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility will produce a daily schedule to at least meet the required 3.2 minimum general nursing care Per Patient Day hour requirement. The Director of Nursing or designee will provide re-education on minimum general nursing care staffing hours to Registered Nurse Supervisors and Human Resources/Scheduling who are responsible to maintain adequate general nursing care staffing hours. The Director of Nursing or designee will educate HR/Scheduler and RN supervisors of protocols for replacing staff related to call offs, including mandating staff when replacement staff are unable to be found. The Director of Nursing or designee will meet 5 days per week for 4 weeks to audit the daily deployment sheet for accuracy to ensure the daily schedule meets minimum general nursing care staffing PPD. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit the hours worked to ensure that the minimum number of general nursing care staff hours have been met using the Department of Health staffing grid for 4 weeks. The Director of Nursing or designee will audit weekly that protocols were followed when a call off occurred. This includes asking staff to stay, posting need, posting need with agencies, offering bonus, and mandating when needed. The results of these audits will be reviewed at Quality Assurance and Process Improvement meetings until substantial compliance is achieved.
Failure to Maintain Clean Shower Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in one of its two shower rooms, specifically the Red shower room. During an observation, a black substance was found between the white ceramic tiles, and a gray substance was covering the surface of the tiles closest to the floor. The facility's policy on cleaning, dated 1/16/24, outlines a procedure for cleaning ceramic tile walls, which includes using a quaternary disinfectant and scrubbing the tiles and grout. However, during an interview, a housekeeper was unable to confirm when the shower room was last cleaned, and the facility could not provide evidence of the last cleaning date. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the presence of the substances and acknowledged that they should not be present on the tiles.
Latest citations in Pennsylvania
A resident with dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, residing on a locked unit with a wander guard, was able to leave the secured area by closely following a housekeeper through coded double doors and out a side door without being noticed. Staff did not check for residents before and after exiting the unit, and the resident left the premises, traveled into the community, and purchased food and a drink before being located by local police and returned without injury. The facility’s elopement policy required monitoring for missing residents and initiation of emergency procedures, but these measures were only implemented after the resident was discovered missing and an elopement alarm was activated.
Surveyors observed that dietary staff did not follow the facility’s personal hygiene policy requiring hair restraints, as two dietary employees worked over uncovered food on the tray line with uncovered mustaches. In the same food preparation area, equipment including a large mixer with an uncovered bowl, a Robot-coupe mixer, and a blender were stored and used beneath window frames with peeling paint, and a nearby window blind had dried food debris along its length. Another window frame above a storage rack of meal trays also had peeling paint, demonstrating unsanitary food storage and preparation conditions.
Surveyors determined that the facility failed to provide required written notices of transfers and discharges to multiple residents and/or their representatives, and did not notify the State LTC Ombudsman when residents were transferred to the hospital after changes in condition or left against medical advice. Record reviews showed repeated absence of documentation that residents or responsible parties received written information about the transfers, and that the Ombudsman was informed. The Administrator confirmed that these notifications were not sent.
The facility failed to address repeated grievances regarding slow responses to resident call bells. The grievance policy required acknowledgment and active resolution of both written and verbal complaints, yet multiple residents reported that call bells often went unanswered for more than 30 minutes. Resident council minutes over several consecutive months documented ongoing complaints about delayed call bell response, and grievance records showed multiple similar complaints over an extended period. The DON and the administrator acknowledged a pattern of complaints about slow call bell responses and confirmed that the facility had not responded to these grievances.
Surveyors found that the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on two nursing units, noting a shattered clear plastic fire extinguisher cover in a hallway between resident rooms, holes in bathroom walls, a dented and misshaped room entrance doorframe near the floor, a hole in the wall between resident beds, and dented, crumbling wallboard near a bathroom entrance. These conditions were cited under state regulations for licensee responsibility and management.
A deficiency was identified when a resident’s MDS assessment did not accurately reflect the resident’s need for corrective lenses. The resident had a history of diabetes mellitus and falls and was care planned for impaired vision with a requirement for glasses. Despite this, the MDS indicated that no corrective lenses were needed during the look-back period, while direct observation showed the resident wearing glasses, and the Administrator later confirmed the inaccuracy of the MDS documentation.
A resident with chronic kidney disease and DM was documented on the MDS as alert and frequently incontinent of urine, and the CAA indicated that urinary incontinence should be addressed in the care plan. Review of the resident’s current care plan showed no interventions related to urinary incontinence, and the DON confirmed there was no documented evidence that this identified care area was included in the plan.
A resident with chronic kidney disease, polyneuropathies, and muscle weakness, who had no cognitive impairment and required substantial staff assistance for showers and total assistance for transfers, was scheduled to receive showers twice weekly on the evening shift. Over a 30-day period, there was no documentation that showers were provided, offered, or refused, and the resident reported not having had a shower since admission. The DON confirmed the absence of documentation that shower care was offered or provided, resulting in a deficiency related to nursing services and ADL care.
Surveyors found that staff did not follow multiple physician orders for three residents. A resident with diabetes received ordered insulin even when blood glucose readings were below the ordered hold parameter. Another resident with cerebral palsy, DM, and heart failure had repeated significant overnight weight gains without evidence that the physician was notified as ordered. A third resident with anemia and CKD had ordered CBC and CMP lab tests that were not documented as completed. The DON confirmed there was no documentation that these physician orders were carried out.
Staff failed to follow facility policy and physician orders requiring documentation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPI’s) before administering PRN oxycodone for two residents. One resident with osteoarthritis, hip pain, and diabetes had orders for NPI documentation each shift and PRN oxycodone for moderate to severe pain, yet received the narcotic multiple times in a month without any recorded attempt of NPI’s beforehand. Another resident with a history of stroke, diabetes, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis also had orders to document NPI’s prior to PRN pain medication, but similarly received PRN oxycodone several times without documentation that NPI’s were tried first, resulting in noncompliance with state pharmacy and nursing service regulations.
Failure to Prevent Elopement From Secured Unit
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves a resident with unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety who was admitted to the facility in November 2025 and resided on a locked, secured unit requiring a code to exit. The facility had a written "Wandering and Elopements" policy that directed staff, when a resident was missing, to initiate the elopement/missing resident emergency procedure, determine if the resident was on an authorized leave, search the building and premises if not authorized to leave, and notify administration, the resident’s representative, the attending physician, and law enforcement if the resident was not located. On the date of the incident, the resident closely followed a housekeeper through double doors on the ground floor into a back hallway and then out a side door, leaving the secured unit without authorization. The housekeeper was unaware that the resident had followed through the door, and staff failed to ensure the resident’s safety by not checking for residents before and after exiting the unit. An elopement alarm was later activated after the resident was found to be unaccounted for on the secured unit, and the facility’s established protocols were then initiated, including notification of local law enforcement. The resident was subsequently located off premises by local police, sitting in a relaxed manner, conversing appropriately with officers, holding a beverage, and with no visible injuries, and he denied pain or discomfort. Facility documentation showed that the resident had been able to travel far enough to purchase food and a drink at a restaurant, as evidenced by a receipt from a nearby McDonald’s. A progress note recorded that the resident had been noted not on the unit, an immediate search was conducted, administration and proper authorities were notified, and the resident was returned safely, with a skin check completed and the resident later observed in his room eating dinner. In an interview, the resident stated that it was taking too long to get out of the building, that he waited for an opportunity and took it, and that he wanted to leave and go back to his place. In a separate interview, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that staff failed to ensure the resident’s safety by not checking for residents before and after exiting the unit, leading to the elopement from the secured environment.
Unsanitary Food Storage and Staff Hygiene Practices in Dietary Department
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and handle food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department in accordance with its own policy and professional standards. The facility’s “Personal Hygiene” policy dated February 2, 2026, required all staff to wear hair restraints to effectively keep hair from contacting exposed food. During observation of the lunch meal service tray line on April 15, 2026, from 11:30 a.m. to 12:03 p.m., two dietary employees were observed working directly over uncovered food on the tray line with uncovered mustaches. In the same area, the window frame above the shelf where a large mixer with an uncovered bowl, a Robot-coupe mixer, and a blender were stored had peeling paint, while the Robot-coupe mixer and blender were actively being used to prepare resident food. Additionally, the blind in this window frame had dried food debris along its length, and another window frame above a storage rack of resident meal trays also had peeling paint. These conditions were cited under 42 CFR 483.60(i) Food Safety Requirements and 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee, and had been previously cited on March 26, 2025. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were described in the report; the deficiency focused on environmental and staff hygiene practices in the dietary department during food preparation and tray line service.
Failure to Provide Required Written Transfer Notices and Ombudsman Notification
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors found that the facility failed to provide required written notifications of transfers and discharges to residents and/or their representatives, and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for six residents who were transferred out of the facility. Clinical record review showed that one resident was transferred to the hospital after a change in condition on December 26, 2025, without documented evidence that the resident or responsible party received written information regarding the transfer or that a copy of the transfer notice was sent to the Ombudsman. Another resident was transferred to the hospital after a change in condition on January 9, 2026, with no documented evidence that the Ombudsman was notified of the transfer. Additional record reviews revealed that three more residents were transferred to the hospital after changes in condition on March 30, 2026, and March 12, 2026, without documentation that the residents and/or their responsible parties or legal representatives were provided written information regarding the transfers, or that the Ombudsman was notified. One resident left the facility against medical advice on February 3, 2026, and there was no documented evidence that the Ombudsman was notified of this transfer. In an interview on April 17, 2026, the Administrator confirmed that notifications of transfers were not sent to the residents and/or their representatives and that written notices of the transfers and discharge were not sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.
Failure to Address Repeated Grievances About Slow Call Bell Response
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address ongoing grievances related to slow response times to resident call bells, as required by its grievance policy. The policy, last reviewed on February 24, 2026, stated that grievances could be either formal written complaints or verbal complaints to staff, and that the facility was to acknowledge and actively work toward resolution of such complaints. During a confidential resident group interview on April 14, 2026, all four participating residents reported that call bells were answered slowly, often taking more than 30 minutes. Review of resident council minutes from September 8, 2025, through December 11, 2025, showed repeated complaints about slow call bell responses at each monthly meeting, with no evidence that any resident council minutes were recorded in 2026. Additionally, review of resident grievances from October 31, 2025, through March 23, 2026, revealed multiple complaints about slow call bell responses on several dates in late 2025 and early 2026. In an interview on April 17, 2026, the DON and Nursing Home Administrator confirmed there was a pattern of complaints about slow call bell responses and that the facility had failed to respond to those grievances. These findings demonstrate that the facility did not honor residents’ rights to have grievances acknowledged and addressed, despite repeated verbal and written complaints documented through resident council minutes and the grievance process.
Damaged Walls, Doorframes, and Fire Extinguisher Cover Compromise Safe, Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of five nursing units, specifically the [NAME] and [NAME] units. During observations conducted over two days, surveyors noted that the clear plastic fire extinguisher cover in the hallway between rooms 135 and 137 was shattered. In one resident bathroom, there were holes on the left and right walls, and the doorframe at the entrance to another resident room was dented and misshaped near the floor. Additionally, there was a hole in the wall between the beds in another resident room, and the wallboard at the bottom of the wall to the right of the entrance to a bathroom in yet another room was dented and crumbling. These environmental deficiencies were directly observed in resident care areas and common hallways and were cited under 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) regarding the responsibility of the licensee and 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(2.1) regarding management responsibilities.
Inaccurate MDS Documentation of Resident’s Need for Corrective Lenses
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident’s current status. Clinical record review showed that Resident 139 had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and a history of falls, and the resident required glasses to correct impaired vision. The resident’s care plan documented a problem with impaired vision and indicated that glasses were required beginning March 8, 2022. However, the MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented in Section B (Hearing, Speech, and Vision) that the resident did not require corrective lenses during the previous seven days. On observation on April 14, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., Resident 139 was noted to be wearing glasses. In an interview on April 17, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the MDS assessment for this resident was inaccurate, as it did not reflect the resident’s actual need for and use of corrective lenses during the assessment look-back period.
Failure to Include Urinary Incontinence in Comprehensive Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed an identified care area for one resident. Clinical record review showed that this resident had chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus, and a Minimum Data Set completed on February 20, 2026, documented that the resident was alert and frequently incontinent of urine. The Care Area Assessment summary dated the same day specified that the resident’s urinary incontinence was to be addressed in the care plan. However, review of the current care plan revealed no evidence that interventions for urinary incontinence were included. In an interview on April 17, 2026, at 10:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no documented evidence that this identified care area was addressed in the resident’s care plan.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers and Document ADL Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide and document assistance with activities of daily living, specifically showering, for one resident who was dependent on staff for this care. The resident was admitted on March 12, 2026, with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, polyneuropathies, and muscle weakness. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated March 19, 2026, showed the resident had no cognitive impairment, required substantial staff assistance for showers, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers. Facility documentation indicated the resident was scheduled to receive showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays during the evening shift. However, the resident reported on April 14, 2026, that they had not had a shower since admission, and review of the clinical record showed no evidence that a shower had been provided, offered, or refused during the previous 30 days. The DON confirmed on April 16, 2026, that there was no documented evidence that showers were offered or provided to this resident. This deficiency was cited under 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) related to nursing services.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Insulin, Weight Monitoring, and Lab Tests
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement and follow physicians’ orders for three residents. For one resident with diabetes mellitus, a physician ordered Novolog insulin to be administered in the morning prior to breakfast, with instructions to hold the insulin if the resident’s blood sugar was less than 80 mg/dL. Review of the April 2026 MAR showed that staff administered the insulin on three occasions when the resident’s blood sugar was below 80 mg/dL, contrary to the physician’s order. Another resident with cerebral palsy, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure had a physician’s order to be weighed every night shift and to notify the physician if the resident gained more than 2 lbs in 24 hours or 5 lbs in one week. Clinical records showed multiple instances of significant weight gains over 24-hour periods, including gains of 4.7 lbs, 3.4 lbs, 6 lbs, 2.3 lbs, 5.8 lbs, 4 lbs, 2.4 lbs, and 3.3 lbs, without documented evidence that the physician was notified as ordered. A third resident with anemia and chronic kidney disease had a physician’s order for two blood tests (CBC and CMP), but the clinical record contained no documentation that these lab tests were obtained. The DON confirmed there was no documented evidence that care and services were provided in accordance with these physicians’ orders.
Failure to Document Non-Pharmacological Interventions Before PRN Narcotic Administration
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow the facility’s pain management policy and specific physician orders requiring documentation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPI’s) and their effectiveness prior to administering as-needed narcotic pain medication for two residents. The policy, last reviewed February 24, 2026, required staff to document NPI’s and their effectiveness for patients receiving pain interventions. For a resident with left knee osteoarthritis, right hip pain, and diabetes, a physician ordered on March 17, 2026, that NPI’s be documented every shift, and on April 6, 2026, ordered oxycodone every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of the MAR showed that this resident received as-needed oxycodone 23 times in April 2026 without documented evidence that NPI’s were attempted prior to administration. Another resident with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), diabetes, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis had a physician order dated February 7, 2026, directing staff to document NPI’s used before administering as-needed pain medication, and an order dated April 3, 2026, for oxycodone every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. MAR review revealed this resident received as-needed oxycodone nine times in April 2026 without documented evidence that NPI’s were attempted prior to administration, in violation of 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services and 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



