Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Abington Manor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively intact resident with sepsis and MI was not invited to participate in her person-centered care plan. She reported being showered late at night instead of her preferred early morning time, told staff about the concern, and was told she would be showered when staff had time. The record had no evidence of a care plan conference or that the resident was invited to participate in care planning, and the DON confirmed no such documentation existed.
An inaccurate MDS was completed for a resident with dysphagia and cognitive loss when Section A1005 was coded as unable to respond. The record showed Spanish communication supports and family involvement, but there was no documented attempt to contact the resident's daughter or other representative for accurate ethnic background information, and the RNAC confirmed the coding was not accurate.
A resident with cerebral infarction and parkinsonism had one of two hearing aids missing, and staff had not helped locate it or obtain a replacement. The record showed only one hearing aid was present, but the care plan had no details on hearing status, hearing aid care, storage, or maintenance, and the DON could not provide further care plan documentation.
Failure to Individualize Toileting Plan for a Resident With Urinary Retention: A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of urinary retention had a catheter removed after an acute care stay, then showed mixed continence status with no ongoing documentation of bladder function, retention monitoring, or an individualized toileting plan. The care plan listed general incontinence measures, but it did not identify the type of incontinence or include scheduled toileting or prompted voiding, and the DON confirmed there was no documentation of a post-hospital continence evaluation.
A deficiency was cited when a resident was not protected from various forms of abuse and neglect, as the facility did not ensure adequate safeguards against physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, or neglect by any individual.
Two residents reported ongoing concerns about delayed call bell response times, with one resident experiencing waits of over an hour that led to incontinence episodes. Despite the facility's policy requiring investigation and resolution of grievances within five working days, there was no evidence that these concerns were addressed in a timely manner, and the administrator confirmed the lack of documentation.
Surveyors found that both nursing units had worn, stained, and debris-laden carpeting, with multiple instances of visible stains, substance build-ups, and scattered debris such as paper pieces and food items. A plastic safety lancet was also found on the floor. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed awareness of these conditions and acknowledged the facility's responsibility to maintain a clean and homelike environment.
A resident with Parkinson's disease and a malignant carcinoid tumor received oxycodone-acetaminophen for pain levels below the physician-ordered threshold, contrary to the care plan and professional standards. The DON confirmed the medication was given outside prescribed parameters.
A resident with COPD and a recent femur fracture was given a full 5 mg dose of oxycodone by an LPN instead of the prescribed 2.5 mg. This error led to an unresponsive episode requiring naloxone administration. The DON confirmed the error and noted the resident's poor renal clearance contributed to the adverse reaction.
The facility failed to prevent and manage pressure ulcers for two residents. One resident developed a pressure ulcer due to the improper use of elbow protectors without documented orders or skin assessments. Another resident's sacral pressure ulcer worsened due to a lack of consistent wound measurements, hindering the evaluation of treatment effectiveness. The Director of Nursing confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility inaccurately coded MDS assessments for two residents, indicating dialysis and insulin treatments that were not administered. The DON confirmed these errors, as no dialysis or insulin was provided to the residents, contrary to what was documented.
A resident at risk for falls due to altered mobility and medication use experienced multiple falls, including one in the bathroom when left unattended by a nurse aide. Despite a care plan intervention requiring staff to stay with the resident in the bathroom, this was not consistently followed, leading to a fall and injuries.
The facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration for two residents. One resident with diabetes and COPD missed several medications, including insulin and inhalers, while another resident with diabetes did not receive their insulin dose. The Director of Nursing confirmed these lapses, which were identified through record reviews and staff interviews.
A resident was administered Cephalexin without documented symptoms of a UTI and without confirmation of the organism's susceptibility to the antibiotic. Despite the facility's antibiotic stewardship policy, there was no evidence to justify the necessity of the prescription, as confirmed by staff interviews.
The facility failed to date food items in storage, increasing the risk of food-borne illness. Surveyors observed 14 thawed nutritional beverage shakes and two bags of frozen vegetables without proper dating. The food service director confirmed that all food items should be dated to ensure safety and quality.
A facility failed to document the specific circumstances for administering Morphine Sulfate to a resident with end-stage kidney disease, anxiety, and shortness of breath. The MAR lacked clarity on whether the medication was for pain or shortness of breath, as confirmed by the DON, leading to a deficiency in accurate record-keeping.
The facility failed to deliver unopened mail to two residents, violating their right to personal privacy. Both residents, who were cognitively intact, reported instances of receiving opened mail, particularly from medical sources. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the residents' rights but lacked documentation to prove compliance with the facility's procedure requiring mail to be delivered unopened within 24 hours.
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement safety measures, resulting in a resident's fall with injury and another resident's unauthorized absence. Staff neglected to activate a chair alarm and did not account for a resident's whereabouts, leading to significant lapses in care.
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff, resulting in a severely cognitively impaired resident falling and injuring himself, and another resident being unsupervised and missing for hours, eventually found at a casino. The facility was unable to demonstrate adequate supervision and care for the residents during the shift in question.
The facility failed to maintain accurate clinical records when an LPN documented administering medications to a resident who was not present in the facility. The ADON confirmed the discrepancy, highlighting a breach in professional standards of nursing documentation.
Resident not invited to participate in care planning and shower preference not addressed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 121 was invited to participate in the development and implementation of her person-centered plan of care. Resident 121 was admitted with diagnoses including sepsis and myocardial infarction, and her quarterly MDS dated September 12, 2025, showed she was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. During an interview on September 17, 2025, the resident stated she had not been invited to participate in the care planning process, including preferences related to shower times. Resident 121 reported that she was showered at 11:00 PM on September 16, 2025, even though her preference was to shower during day shift, specifically early morning. She stated she told staff about her concern with the late shower time and was told she would be showered when staff had time. The resident said she was cold with her hair wet all night and had trouble sleeping. Review of the clinical record found no documented evidence that a care plan conference had been conducted or that the resident had been invited to participate in the development or review of her comprehensive care plan or preferences. The DON confirmed there was no documentation showing a care plan conference had been held since admission or that the resident had been invited to participate in the care planning process.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Ethnic Background
Penalty
Summary
An inaccurate MDS was completed for one resident with dysphagia and cognitive loss. The admission MDS coded Section A1005, identifying information including ethnic background and race, as "Resident Unable to Respond," even though the resident's centered care plan described use of a Spanish communication board and Spanish music, and the resident's daughter was involved in care through in-person presence and phone contact documented in the clinical record. The RAI Manual states that when a resident cannot respond, a family member, significant other, guardian, or legally authorized representative may be contacted for the needed information, and if no other resources provide the information, the resident may be coded as unable to respond. The clinical record did not show any attempt to contact the resident's representative to obtain accurate ethnic background information, and the RN Assessment Coordinator confirmed in interview that the coding for the resident was not accurate.
Missing Hearing Aid Not Addressed in Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident 122 that addressed hearing aid needs. Resident 122 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and parkinsonism. On observation, one hearing aid was found on the resident’s nightstand, and the resident stated that one hearing aid had been lost approximately 1-2 weeks earlier. The resident also stated that staff had not helped locate the missing hearing aid and the facility had not tried to help obtain a replacement. Review of the clinical record showed the resident came to the facility with 2 hearing aids, but a progress note documented that only one hearing aid was present and that laundry services, dietary services, and the supervisor were notified of the missing hearing aid. The grievance log contained no grievance filed by staff regarding the lost hearing aid through the survey date. The care plan contained no documentation about the resident’s hearing ability, hearing aid care, storage, or maintenance, and there was no documented evidence that the facility developed a care plan reflecting the resident’s hearing status or a timeline to maintain that status. The DON stated the facility was unable to provide further documentation of the resident’s care plan, including documentation of the resident’s hearing deficit.
Failure to Individualize Toileting Plan for Resident With Urinary Retention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized plan of care to address the toileting needs of Resident 12, including restoring bladder function to the extent possible and preventing recurrence of urinary tract infections. Facility policy required nursing staff to identify and document circumstances related to incontinence and to use interventions such as scheduled toileting or prompted voiding, with ongoing review until continence was restored or improved as much as possible. Resident 12 was admitted with COPD and was cognitively impaired, with a BIMS score of 6, and required staff assistance with toileting, toileting hygiene, and transfers. The resident had a voiding trial in early April 2025, after which bladder scans and straight catheterization showed urinary retention, leading to insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter. After returning from an acute care hospital stay on April 30, 2025, Resident 12 no longer had a catheter and was documented as both continent and incontinent on limited occasions over the next several days, but there was no additional documentation of continence or incontinence status, monitoring for urinary retention, or ongoing evaluation of bladder function. The resident’s care plan, revised in September 2025, identified bladder incontinence and included interventions such as medication administration, skin barrier creams, reporting signs of UTI, reporting urine changes, reporting skin integrity changes, and absorbent products as needed. However, it did not identify the type of incontinence or include individualized interventions such as a toileting program, prompted voiding, or scheduled toileting, and the DON confirmed the facility could not provide documentation showing the resident was evaluated for continence status, type of incontinence, or urine retention after the hospital return despite a known history of urinary retention.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse and Neglect
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the facility's failure to protect each resident from all types of abuse, including physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by any individual. The report notes that residents were not adequately safeguarded from these forms of mistreatment, indicating lapses in the facility's protective measures and oversight.
Failure to Promptly Resolve Resident Grievances Regarding Call Bell Response
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for two residents regarding call bell response times. According to the facility's grievance policy, concerns should be investigated and the person filing the grievance notified of the resolution within five working days. However, review of the complaint log and resident council meeting minutes showed that concerns about extended call bell response times were raised by two residents in consecutive meetings, and there was no evidence that these grievances were investigated or resolved in a timely manner as required by policy. One resident, who was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, reported that the issue with delayed call bell response had not been resolved and described waiting over an hour for assistance, resulting in episodes of incontinence. The facility was unable to provide documentation showing that the grievance was addressed according to their policy. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the lack of timely resolution documentation during an interview.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Homelike Environment on Nursing Units
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment on both Floor 1 and Floor 2 nursing units. During a facility tour, multiple instances of worn, stained, and tattered carpeting were noted throughout four resident hallways. Scattered debris, including white paper pieces, orange chips, and a small solid brown object, was found on the floors. Specific observations included multiple white stains, dark discolorations, and substance build-ups on the carpets, as well as an encrusted orange substance between resident rooms. Additionally, a plastic safety lancet was found on the floor, though the needle was retracted and locked in its protective barrier. Interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed awareness of the poor condition of the carpeting, including the presence of multiple stains, visible debris, and substance build-ups. The NHA acknowledged the facility's responsibility to ensure a clean and homelike environment for residents. The findings were determined to be in violation of state regulations regarding management, resident rights, and nursing services.
Pain Medication Administered Outside Physician Parameters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan, and physician orders for one resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and a malignant carcinoid tumor, had a care plan goal for pain to be managed within acceptable limits, with interventions to administer pain medications as ordered. Physician orders specified that oxycodone-acetaminophen was to be given only for pain levels rated 5-10, and acetaminophen for pain levels 1-5. A review of the Medication Administration Record showed that the resident received oxycodone-acetaminophen on four occasions for pain levels below the prescribed threshold, specifically for pain scores of 0, 3, and 4, which did not meet the criteria for administration of this medication. The DON confirmed that the medication was administered outside the parameters set by the physician, and acknowledged the facility's responsibility to ensure pain management is provided according to professional standards.
Significant Medication Error: Incorrect Oxycodone Dose Administered
Penalty
Summary
A significant medication error occurred when a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a recent femur fracture was administered an incorrect dose of oxycodone. The resident had a physician's order for 2.5 mg (half tablet) of oxycodone every 8 hours as needed for pain, but on the morning in question, an LPN administered a full 5 mg tablet instead of the prescribed half dose. This error was confirmed by both the Medication Administration Record and an employee witness statement, which indicated the nurse forgot to split the tablet. Following the administration of the incorrect dose, the resident experienced a sudden change in mental status, including diaphoresis, a blank stare, and unresponsiveness. Medical staff responded by assessing the resident, obtaining new orders, and administering naloxone (Narcan) to reverse the opioid effects. The resident's condition improved within minutes after intervention. The Director of Nursing confirmed the medication error and noted that the resident's poor renal clearance contributed to the adverse response.
Failure to Prevent and Manage Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently implement measures to promote healing and prevent the development of pressure sores for two residents. Resident 1, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, was at risk for pressure sore development. Despite having a care plan that included interventions such as pressure-reducing cushions and regular skin assessments, an open area was identified on the resident's right antecubital area. This was discovered by a nurse aide who noticed the elbow pad was very tight, leading to the development of a pressure ulcer. The facility did not have documented orders or interventions for the use of elbow protectors, and no skin assessment was conducted for potential risks associated with their use. Resident 204 was admitted with a Stage 3 pressure ulcer on the right buttock and coccyx and an intact blister on the right lower back. The care plan included interventions such as enhanced barrier precautions and regular skin assessments. However, the facility failed to document wound measurements for the sacral pressure area, which is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment plan. Observations revealed that the resident had an alternating air mattress and elevated heels, but the sacral wound had worsened significantly without proper evaluation or documentation of its progression. Interviews with the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not thoroughly evaluate Resident 204's sacral pressure ulcer for changes and failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of Resident 1's pressure ulcer. The lack of consistent wound measurements and the improper use of protective devices contributed to the deficiencies identified in the care of these residents.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Dialysis and Insulin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents. For Resident 69, the MDS assessment indicated that the resident received dialysis treatments while at the facility. However, a review of the clinical records and an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident 69 was not receiving dialysis services and had not received any dialysis treatments as a resident at the facility. The MDS was incorrectly coded to reflect dialysis services without a physician's order. Similarly, for Resident 79, the MDS assessment indicated that the resident received three insulin injections in the last seven days. However, further clinical record review revealed no documented evidence of insulin administration during that period. The DON confirmed that Resident 79 did not receive insulin as indicated in the MDS assessment, and the coding was done in error. These inaccuracies in the MDS assessments were identified during a review of clinical records and staff interviews.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Plan for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a person-centered fall prevention plan for a resident identified as being at risk for falls due to altered mobility and antidepressant medication use. Despite having a care plan in place that included interventions such as encouraging slow position changes and assistance with transfers, the resident experienced multiple falls over a period of time. The resident's fall risk was documented as moderate, with a history of prior falls and a tendency to overestimate or forget limitations. On November 8, 2024, the resident fell in the bathroom when a nurse aide left him unattended to gather hygiene supplies, resulting in a skin tear and a reopened surgical incision. Following this incident, a new intervention was added to the resident's care plan, requiring staff to remain with the resident while in the bathroom. However, during an observation on November 12, 2024, a nurse aide left the resident unattended in the bathroom, contrary to the updated care plan. Interviews with staff, including the Director of Nursing, confirmed the facility's responsibility to ensure the implementation of the care plan interventions, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Administer Medications as Prescribed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide quality care by not adhering to physician orders for medication administration for two residents. Resident 64, who has diabetes mellitus and COPD, did not receive several prescribed medications on November 7, 2024. These included a morning Accu-check for blood glucose, a dose of Lantus insulin, Spiriva inhaler, Systane Ultra eye drops, and Pregabalin for neuropathy, all scheduled for 6:00 A.M. The failure to administer these medications as ordered was confirmed by a review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR). Similarly, Resident 6, diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and cerebral infarction, did not receive the prescribed Basaglar insulin dose on November 12, 2024, which was scheduled for 6:30 A.M. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not follow physician orders, resulting in the residents not receiving necessary treatments at the designated times. This deficiency was identified through clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and staff interviews.
Failure to Ensure Drug Regimen Free of Unnecessary Antibiotics
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary antibiotic medications. The resident, who was admitted with a history of myocardial infarction, was prescribed and administered Cephalexin despite the absence of documented symptoms of a urinary tract infection. A culture laboratory report indicated the presence of Klebsiella oxytoca ESBL and Enterococcus species in the resident's urine, but it did not specify the susceptibility or resistance of these organisms to Cephalexin. Despite this lack of information, the resident received twenty doses of Cephalexin over a five-day period. Interviews with facility staff, including a Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that there was no documented evidence to justify the necessity of the Cephalexin prescription. The facility's policy on antibiotic stewardship requires that culture and sensitivity results be communicated to the prescriber to determine the appropriate course of antibiotic therapy. However, this protocol was not followed, leading to the administration of potentially unnecessary antibiotics to the resident.
Failure to Date Food Items in Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department. During an initial tour of the department, surveyors observed 14 four-ounce thawed nutritional beverage shakes on a refrigerator shelf that were not dated with a thaw or discard date, despite the manufacturer's label indicating they should be used within 14 days of thawing. Additionally, two bags of frozen vegetables in the freezer were not dated. An interview with the food service director confirmed that all food items were supposed to be properly dated to ensure safety and quality.
Failure to Document Medication Administration Circumstances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the clinical record of a resident, specifically regarding the administration of medication. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including end-stage kidney disease, anxiety, shortness of breath, and a need for palliative care, had a physician's order for Morphine Sulfate solution to be administered as needed for shortness of breath or pain. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the resident did not specify the circumstances under which the narcotic medication should be administered, whether for pain or shortness of breath. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility did not specify when the narcotic medication should be administered to the resident. The DON acknowledged that there should have been two separate orders to identify if the resident required the medication for shortness of breath or pain. This lack of specification in the MAR led to a deficiency in maintaining accurate records as per professional standards of practice.
Failure to Deliver Unopened Mail to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that mail was delivered unopened to two residents, violating their right to personal privacy. Resident 64, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, reported that his mail was sometimes opened before he received it, and on occasions, it was not in the sender's envelope. This resident was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and essential hypertension. Similarly, Resident 20, also cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and depression, stated that her mail, particularly from medical sources, was opened without her permission before delivery. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the residents' right to receive unopened mail but could not provide documented evidence that Residents 20 and 64 received their mail unopened as required. The facility's written procedure indicated that residents have the right to personal privacy, including receiving unopened mail within 24 hours, unless they request otherwise. This deficiency was identified during a review of clinical records, facility procedures, and interviews with residents and staff.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision and Implement Safety Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate staff supervision to timely identify a resident's unauthorized absence and to consistently implement planned safety measures to prevent a fall. Resident 2, who was admitted with Alzheimer's disease and mild dementia, was identified as being at high risk for falls. Despite care planned interventions, including the use of bed and chair alarms, the resident was found on the floor with a significant injury after being left unsupervised in the dining room. The responsible nurse aide admitted to forgetting to activate the chair alarm, and the resident was left unsupervised for nearly two hours before the fall occurred. Resident 1, who was cognitively intact and independent with ambulation, was not accounted for during a shift on March 31, 2024. Multiple staff members failed to notice his absence, and it was later discovered that he had left the facility without signing out. The resident was eventually located at a casino, where he expressed a desire not to return to the facility. The staff's failure to supervise and account for the resident's whereabouts led to a significant lapse in care, as the resident missed several scheduled medication administrations. Interviews with various staff members, including the assistant director of nursing, confirmed the facility's failure to implement safety interventions and provide adequate supervision for both residents. The incidents highlight significant deficiencies in the facility's ability to ensure resident safety and proper supervision, leading to preventable injuries and unauthorized absences.
Insufficient Nursing Staff Leads to Resident Injuries and Unsupervised Absence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to consistently provide timely care and supervision necessary to maintain the physical and mental well-being of two residents. Resident 2, who was severely cognitively impaired and at high risk for falls, was found on the floor with a bleeding hand after being left unsupervised in the dining room. The nurse aide responsible for Resident 2's care admitted to forgetting to put the chair alarm on his wheelchair, and the resident was left unsupervised for nearly two hours before the fall occurred. The assistant director of nursing confirmed that the facility failed to implement planned safety interventions and provide adequate staff supervision to prevent the fall and subsequent injury. Resident 1, who was cognitively intact and independent with ambulation, was not located in the facility for many hours on Easter Sunday. The resident did not receive his scheduled medications and blood sugar monitoring throughout the day. Multiple staff members, including a registered nurse and nurse aides, failed to report the resident's absence or locate him. The resident was eventually found at a local casino, where he stated he did not want to return to the facility. The assistant director of nursing and the social worker had the resident sign a handwritten form discharging himself against medical advice. The facility's staffing records for the day revealed that there was insufficient staff to adequately supervise and provide care for the residents. The nursing home administrator and the assistant director of nursing confirmed that the facility was unable to demonstrate the provision of sufficient nursing staff to supervise and provide care as planned and ordered for Resident 1 during the shift in question.
Failure to Maintain Accurate Clinical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for one of four sampled residents. Employee 3, an LPN, documented that she administered medications to Resident 1 at 5:00 PM on March 31, 2024. However, it was later confirmed through staff interviews and a review of the facility's documentation that Resident 1 was not present in the facility at that time and did not receive any medications after 6:00 AM on that date. Employee 3 had reported Resident 1's absence to the RN Supervisor at approximately 4:30 PM but still documented the administration of the medications at 5:00 PM, which was inaccurate and false documentation. This action is in violation of the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation and the Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing Subsection 21.145 and 21.148, which require accurate and timely documentation of patient care activities. The ADON confirmed during an interview on April 3, 2024, that Employee 3 did not administer the 5:00 PM medications to Resident 1 as documented. This discrepancy highlights a failure in maintaining accurate medical records and ensuring proper communication among the healthcare team. The incident underscores the importance of adhering to professional standards of practice in nursing documentation to support informed decision-making and high-quality care for residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 459 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Clarks Summit
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allied Services Skilled Nursing Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Allied Services Transitional Rehab Unit | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Green Ridge Care Center | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Marywood Heights | 4.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Embassy Of Scranton | 5 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Abington Manor.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.