Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Veranda Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to review Resident Rights with residents on an ongoing basis. Resident Council minutes showed the topic was not discussed at monthly meetings, and multiple residents stated they were not aware of the Resident Rights or did not recall staff reviewing them. An Activities Director verified the rights were not discussed at Resident Council meetings.
Food items were not properly labeled, dated, or stored to prevent contamination. Staff observed an opened baking cocoa container and opened pasta bags without required dates, a pumpkin pie in the family food refrigerator without a resident name or date, and a sanitizer bucket placed on a food prep table next to Jello mix. The DS and Dietician verified the items were not stored in accordance with facility policy.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to involve three residents and their representatives in ongoing care planning and care conferences. One resident with a history of cerebral infarction, chronic pain, aphasia, DM, HTN, and AFib reported not recalling any IDT care conference, and his guardian stated she had never been invited to one. Two cognitively intact residents with quadriplegia, toe amputations, atherosclerosis, DM, prior MI, colostomy, malnutrition, alcohol abuse, mood disorder, HTN, contractures, and neurogenic bladder reported having only an initial or no subsequent care conferences and not being shown or informed of their care plans. The SSD stated that admission, quarterly, annual, and as-needed care conferences are held and that residents and responsible parties are invited, but the Administrator confirmed there was no documented evidence of care conferences or IDT plans of care for these residents over an extended period.
Uncovered trash cans were observed in the kitchen food prep area and dish washing area. An DS verified the cans were not covered, and only one lid could be found for two cans. A Dietician later confirmed that all trash cans should be covered when not in active use. The issue was identified in a facility with 82 residents, including two residents with NPO diet orders.
A resident with significant cognitive and physical impairments fell from bed and sustained a head laceration requiring sutures after a CNA, working alone, rolled the resident away from herself during incontinence care and instructed the resident to hold onto a side rail. The resident shook the side rail, which detached due to loose pins, leading to the fall. The incident was attributed to inadequate staff assistance and failure to ensure equipment safety.
The facility failed to provide consistent staffing on the 500-Hall, leaving residents unattended and without adequate supervision. Observations revealed that residents had to retrieve their own meal trays and were unable to alert staff in other areas due to the call system only illuminating on the 500-Hall. Interviews confirmed the lack of staff presence, and the staffing sheet indicated inconsistent assignment of nurses or STNAs, leading to gaps in care and supervision.
The facility failed to ensure open food items were sealed and expired items were discarded, as observed during a kitchen tour. An open box of bacon and expired cottage cheese were found in the refrigerator. The DS admitted there was no staff responsible for managing food items in his absence, as the staff were new and not responsible enough. The DS handled these tasks every Monday morning.
The facility failed to address concerns raised by residents during Resident Council meetings, as documented in meeting minutes from March to September 2024. Despite recurring issues with nursing, dietary, housekeeping, and other departments, follow-up actions were often left blank or marked as needing no further action. Interviews revealed that residents did not receive feedback, and the process for communicating resolutions was not effectively implemented.
The facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds after hours and on weekends, affecting two residents and potentially impacting 70 others. Despite a policy allowing ongoing access to petty cash, staff were unaware of procedures for after-hours access, leading to a deficiency in providing residents with their funds.
A facility failed to accurately code diuretic medication on MDS assessments for a resident with COPD and heart failure. Despite receiving Lasix during the look-back periods, the MDS did not reflect this. Interviews confirmed the oversight, and the facility lacked a policy on MDS accuracy.
A resident with multiple health conditions was left with medication at their bedside without supervision, contrary to facility policy. The RN left a controlled substance, a sleeping medication, unattended, and the resident was unsure if the medications were theirs. The ADON and DON confirmed that proper procedures were not followed, indicating a lapse in medication security and supervision.
The facility failed to clean oxygen concentrators as per physician's orders and policy for two residents with COPD. Observations showed the concentrators' filters were covered with dust, indicating they were not cleaned weekly as required. Staff interviews revealed a lack of training and knowledge about the maintenance of these devices.
An LPN left a medication cart unlocked and unattended on two occasions, contrary to facility policy. Interviews with the LPN, ADON, and DON confirmed the expectation that carts should be locked when not in sight. The facility's policy requires medication carts to be locked or attended by authorized personnel.
A resident with a complex medical history did not have their medication administration accurately documented, despite receiving the medications. An LPN failed to sign off on the MAR, and facility leadership expected proper documentation. The facility's policy required complete and timely records, which was not followed.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with a PICC line, as staff did not consistently use appropriate PPE. Another resident's urinary catheter bag was observed on the floor, breaching infection control protocols. Staff acknowledged these issues, and interviews confirmed expectations for proper infection control practices.
A facility failed to secure a resident's urostomy tubing, as observed during a survey. The resident, with a urostomy due to bladder dysfunction and a stage 4 pressure ulcer, was found without a securement device for their urinary drainage system. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of the device, despite facility protocols requiring securement to prevent dislodgment.
The facility failed to maintain resident rooms in good repair and under clean and sanitary conditions, affecting two residents. One resident had a soiled incontinence brief touching their bedside table, while another had a nonfunctional bathroom fan, a hole in the bathroom wall, stained ceiling tiles, and extensive scrapes on the wall behind the bed headboard. These issues were reported but not addressed.
Failure to Review Resident Rights With Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review Resident Rights with residents on an ongoing basis, both in writing and orally. Review of Resident Council minutes for the prior twelve months showed that Resident Rights were not on the agenda and were not discussed at monthly meetings. During interviews, Resident #47 stated he had recently received a copy of the Resident Rights document from the local Ombudsman at a January resident council meeting and had not seen the information before, and Resident #16 stated she had not read the document until Resident #47 brought it to her recently. Additional residents interviewed stated they were not aware of the Resident Rights and did not recall staff ever going over them. The Activities Director verified that Resident Rights were not discussed at the monthly Resident Council meetings.
Food Storage and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Food was not stored and prepared in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. During observation of the kitchen dry storage room, a bag of baking cocoa was found with an open date of 07/12/25 and no discard date, and an open bag of egg noodles and an open bag of penne noodles were found without any date. The Dietary Supervisor verified that the baking cocoa should have had a discard date for six months after opening and that both bags of pasta did not have an open date or a discard date. In the main dining room refrigerator used for food brought in by residents' families, a pumpkin pie was observed without a date or a resident name. The Dietary Supervisor verified that the pie did not have a date or the name of the resident it belonged to. Later, a red bucket containing sanitizer was observed on the food prep table next to two bags of Jello mix, and the Dietician verified that the bucket contained sanitizer and should not have been stored near food. Facility policies required food items to be dated with an open date and use-by date, and food brought in by family or visitors to be labeled and dated.
Failure to Involve Residents and Representatives in Ongoing Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to develop and maintain complete, interdisciplinary care plans with resident and representative participation, as required. Record review showed that one resident admitted with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction, chronic pain, carotid stenosis, depression, anxiety, aphasia, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia had an MDS indicating moderately impaired cognition and moderate depression. This resident reported not remembering ever having a care conference with the IDT to discuss care concerns or his care plan. His guardian, assigned in August 2025, stated she had not been invited to or attended any care conference for him. The Administrator confirmed there was no documented evidence of care conferences or IDT plans of care for this resident since 2024. Two additional residents, both cognitively intact per their MDS assessments and with extensive medical histories including quadriplegia, toe amputations, atherosclerosis of the aorta, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, colostomy, malnutrition, alcohol abuse, mood disorder, hypertension, contractures, and neurogenic bladder, also reported lack of ongoing care conference involvement. One resident stated he had only one care conference upon admission and had not been invited to or had any additional care conferences, and that he had never seen his care plan or been told what was in it. The other resident reported not being invited to or attending a care conference since transitioning from skilled care to LTC in late 2024 and stated she had not seen her care plan nor been informed of its contents. The SSD reported that care conferences are done on admission, quarterly, annually, and upon request, and that residents and responsible parties are invited, but also acknowledged that few attend. The Administrator verified there was no documented evidence of care conferences or IDT plans of care for these residents since 2024, affecting three of four residents reviewed for care planning and care conferences.
Uncovered Trash Cans in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure trash cans in the kitchen were properly covered. During observation of the kitchen on 01/12/2026 at 8:39 A.M., the Dietary Supervisor observed a trash can in the food prep area and another in the dish washing area that did not have lids. The Dietary Supervisor verified that the trash cans were not covered and attempted to cover both cans, but only one lid could be located. On 01/14/2026 at 11:27 A.M., the Dietician verified that all trash cans should be covered when they are not in active use. The report identified two residents with a diet order of nothing by mouth and noted a census of 82 residents.
Failure to Provide Adequate Assistance and Safe Equipment During Incontinence Care Resulting in Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to provide adequate assistance during incontinence care for a resident with significant cognitive impairment and physical dependency. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, schizoaffective disorder, Alzheimer's disease, cerebral vascular disease, and tardive dyskinesia, required substantial maximal assistance for toileting, personal hygiene, transfers, and lower body dressing. During care, a CNA provided assistance alone and rolled the resident away from herself toward the window, instructing the resident to hold onto the side rail. While the resident was being repositioned, she began to shake the side rail, which subsequently gave way and detached from the bed. This resulted in the resident falling from the bed onto the floor, landing face down. The resident sustained a laceration to the forehead, which required cleaning and suturing at the hospital. The incident was witnessed by the CNA, who immediately sought help from nursing staff. The facility's investigation identified equipment failure with the bed's side rail, as the pins attaching the rail were loose. The CNA involved reported being educated to check side rails before use and to seek assistance for care involving residents requiring substantial help. The DON described the expected procedure for providing care to such residents, which included ensuring side rails were secure, proper positioning, and having appropriate staff assistance, but these steps were not followed during the incident.
Inadequate Staffing on 500-Hall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide designated and consistent staffing on the 500-Hall, leaving residents unattended and without adequate supervision. Observations during the survey revealed that residents were left without staff presence, particularly during mealtimes, requiring them to retrieve their own meal trays. The call system on the 500-Hall only illuminated on that hall, preventing residents from alerting staff in other areas of the facility in case of an emergency. Interviews with residents and family members confirmed the lack of staff presence on the 500-Hall, with reports of residents having to search for staff on other floors. Staff interviews revealed there was no process in place to coordinate supervision or assistance for the residents on the 500-Hall. The staffing sheet indicated that the 500-Hall was not consistently assigned a nurse or STNA, leading to gaps in care and supervision. The deficiency affected 13 residents on the 500-Hall, all of whom required assistance with activities of daily living. The facility's staffing plan did not ensure continuous staff presence on the 500-Hall, resulting in residents being left unattended and unable to alert staff in other areas of the facility. This lack of staffing and supervision posed a risk of serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to the residents.
Removal Plan
- Director of Nursing (DON)/designee reviewed staffing assignments and made adjustments to the staffing assignment to ensure staffing personnel are present at all times on the 500 unit.
- Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA)/designee to complete one-time audit of all staff assignments for the rest of the building to ensure appropriate staffing levels.
- IDT [Interdisciplinary team] team, consisting of LNHA, Medical Director, DON, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and clinical support Registered Nurse (RN), to review facility assessment to ensure facility staffing plan is consistent with residents' care needs.
- LNHA/designee to post notice at conspicuous location in facility to notify facility staff to ensure timely communication of unit departure to ensure appropriate coverage and resident needs are met.
- LNHA/designee notified facility Medical Director regarding the Immediate Jeopardy.
- ADON completed assessments including vital signs and head to toe assessments on all residents residing on the 500-Hall. No residents have suffered any adverse effects related to the Immediate Jeopardy.
- Senior LNHA provided education to LNHA and DON regarding the responsibility to ensure each hall in the facility is appropriately supervised to ensure resident needs are met in accordance with each resident's plan of care.
- Facility DON/designee to educate all facility STNAs and nurses regarding their responsibility to ensure appropriate staff personnel are available to meet the needs of the residents on their designated unit and that there should always be a staff member present.
- Human Resources Director/designee to provide education to all new hire nurses and STNAs in new hire orientation prior to working their first shift. The facility does not use agency staffing.
- Scheduler/designee to provide a laminated call sheet for staff to be posted in conspicuous areas on the 500-Hall for who to contact for relief including phone numbers reflecting day, time, and off hours.
- LNHA/designee to monitor daily staffing assignment sheets to ensure proper staffing coverage for all units in the facility. This monitoring shall take place for 8 weeks and will be ongoing thereafter as needed as determined by the facility QAPI [Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement] committee. Additionally, any adverse findings will be shared with the facility QAPI committee and adjustments to corrective action plan will be made as needed.
- DON/designee to monitor daily x [times] 2 weeks, then 5 x weekly x 2 weeks and then 3 x weekly x 4 weeks and ongoing thereafter as needed as determined by facility QAPI committee to ensure there is no lapse in supervision on the 500-Hall. Monitoring is to be conducted randomly and includes monitoring on off hours including evenings and weekends. Monitoring consists of conducting rounds on the 500-Hall unannounced to ensure there is always a staff member available to address any potential resident needs. Any adverse findings will be shared with the facility QAPI committee and adjustments to corrective action plan will be made as needed.
Food Storage and Expiration Management Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that open food items were properly sealed to prevent potential contamination and that expired food items were discarded. During an initial tour of the facility's kitchen, a walk-in refrigerator was found to contain an open box of bacon that was not sealed and a gallon-sized container of cottage cheese with a sell-by date that had passed. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) acknowledged that there was no staff responsible for labeling, rotating, or discarding food items in his absence, as the staff were new and not deemed responsible enough for these tasks. Consequently, the DS took on the responsibility of completing these tasks every Monday morning.
Failure to Address Resident Council Concerns
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide responses to residents' expressed concerns during Resident Council meetings, affecting seven residents who regularly attended these meetings. The review of Resident Council Meeting minutes from March to September 2024 revealed that the section for follow-up actions was often left blank or indicated no further follow-up was needed, despite recurring concerns from residents about various departments such as nursing, dietary, housekeeping, laundry, and maintenance. Interviews with residents and staff highlighted the lack of feedback and resolution to the concerns raised during these meetings. A resident expressed that the Administrator was expected to investigate and provide solutions to the concerns, but no responses were given. Another resident stopped attending the meetings due to the lack of feedback. The Activity Director, who started recently, had not attended any meetings, while Activity Personnel #20, who documented the concerns, stated that the Administrator was supposed to provide feedback, which did not occur. The Administrator and Director of Nursing indicated that the activities staff were responsible for communicating resolutions to the residents, but this process was not effectively implemented. The facility's policy on Resident Council meetings required department directors to return a form with an action plan before the next meeting, but this was not adhered to, resulting in residents not receiving feedback on their concerns.
Failure to Provide After-Hours Access to Resident Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents had access to their personal funds after hours and on weekends, affecting two residents with intact cognition and potentially impacting 70 residents with personal funds accounts. Interviews with residents revealed that they could only access their funds on specific weekdays during business hours, and if the Business Office Manager (BOM) was unavailable, they had no access to their funds. Despite the facility's policy stating that residents should have ongoing access to petty cash, staff members were unaware of any procedures or locations where funds could be accessed outside of regular business hours. Interviews with various staff members, including the BOM, Director of Nursing (DON), and the Administrator, indicated a lack of communication and training regarding the availability of funds on the 400-Hall nurses' cart for after-hours access. Several staff members, including LPNs and State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs), were unaware of the funds' location and informed residents that they would have to wait until the next business day to access their money. This lack of awareness and communication among staff led to the deficiency in providing residents with access to their personal funds as required by facility policy.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Diuretic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate coding of diuretic medication on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for a resident, which was identified during a review of medical records, facility documents, and staff interviews. The resident, who had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, and hypertension, was receiving routine diuretic therapy as part of their care plan. Despite this, the MDS assessments for the resident did not reflect the administration of Lasix, a diuretic medication, during the specified seven-day look-back periods in June and September 2024. Interviews with the MDS Nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident received diuretic medication during the relevant periods, and it should have been accurately coded on the MDS assessments. The MDS Nurse emphasized the importance of accurate coding due to the resident's medical conditions, which could be affected by the medication. Additionally, the facility lacked a policy on MDS accuracy, as revealed by a review of facility documents. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual outlines the requirement to check if a diuretic medication was taken during the look-back period, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Secure and Supervise Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were maintained in a safe and secure manner, affecting a resident with multiple health conditions including COPD, bronchopneumonia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The resident, who had intact cognition, was observed self-administering inhalers while a registered nurse (RN) left additional medication cups on the overbed table without observing the resident take them. The resident expressed uncertainty about whether the medications were prescribed to them, indicating a lack of supervision and verification by the nursing staff. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that nurses were expected to verify medications and observe residents taking them, but this procedure was not followed. The RN admitted to leaving a controlled substance, a sleeping medication, at the bedside due to being busy and unaware of the policy against it. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator both stated that proper procedures for medication administration were expected to be followed, highlighting a lapse in adherence to the facility's medication storage policy.
Failure to Clean Oxygen Concentrators as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to physician's orders and its own policy regarding the cleaning of oxygen concentrators for two residents with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Resident #31, who was admitted with a diagnosis of COPD, required supplemental oxygen at night and occasionally during the day. The physician's orders specified that the filter on the oxygen concentrator should be cleaned weekly on Sundays during the night shift. However, observations revealed that the oxygen concentrator's filter was covered with a thick, gray, fuzzy substance, indicating it had not been cleaned as required. Staff documentation also lacked evidence of the filter being cleaned on the specified date. Similarly, Resident #61, also diagnosed with COPD, required supplemental oxygen. The physician's orders for this resident also included cleaning the oxygen concentrator's filter weekly on Sundays during the night shift. Observations showed that the filter was filled with a gray fuzzy substance, suggesting it had not been cleaned. Staff interviews revealed a lack of training and knowledge regarding the maintenance of the oxygen concentrator filters, contributing to the oversight. Interviews with nursing staff, including the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Registered Nurses (RNs), confirmed the failure to clean the filters as per the orders. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the facility's Administrator acknowledged the expectation for staff to follow protocols for the maintenance of the oxygen concentrator machines. The facility's policy on respiratory equipment cleaning indicated that filters should be cleaned weekly or as needed, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Medication Cart Security Lapse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medication carts were locked when unattended by staff, as observed during a survey. Specifically, an LPN left the 100-Hall medication cart unlocked and unattended on two separate occasions. The first incident occurred when the LPN entered a resident's room to administer medications, leaving the cart out of her line of sight. The second incident happened when the LPN went to the kitchen to retrieve water, again leaving the cart unlocked and unattended. Interviews with the LPN, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the medication cart should have been locked when not within the staff's reach or line of sight. The facility's policy on medication storage, dated July 23, 2019, mandates that medication carts must be locked or attended by authorized personnel. This policy was not adhered to, leading to the deficiency noted in the report.
Failure to Document Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medication administration for a resident, leading to a deficiency in maintaining medical records according to professional standards. The resident, who had a medical history of contracture, chronic pain, anxiety disorder, and quadriplegia, was found to have missing documentation for several doses of prescribed medications, including buspirone, Eliquis, escitalopram, and a Fentanyl patch. Despite the lack of documentation, the resident reported receiving all medications, albeit with a delay on one occasion due to a nurse arriving late. Interviews with the involved LPN and facility leadership revealed that the nurse responsible for administering the medications was unaware of the documentation lapse and acknowledged the failure to sign off on the MAR. Both the DON and the Administrator expressed expectations for accurate and timely documentation of medication administration. The facility's policy on documentation emphasized the need for complete, accurate, and timely records, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE Use and Catheter Bag Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line, which is considered an indwelling medical device. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis of pyogenic arthritis and required intravenous medications, was observed receiving care from staff who did not consistently use the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) as per the facility's policy and CMS guidelines. Despite the care plan indicating the need for EBP due to the resident's increased risk of infection, staff members were observed wearing only gloves or a gown, but not both, during high-contact activities. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that a urinary catheter bag for another resident did not rest on the floor, which is a breach of infection control protocols. This resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and an indwelling urinary catheter, was observed on multiple occasions with the catheter drainage bag on the floor. Staff members, including nursing aides and a licensed practical nurse, acknowledged that the catheter bag should not be on the floor due to infection control concerns. Interviews with the Infection Control Practitioner, Director of Nursing, and Administrator confirmed the expectations for staff to follow EBP guidelines and maintain catheter bags off the floor. The facility's policy on standard and transmission-based precautions was not adhered to, leading to these deficiencies in infection prevention and control practices.
Failure to Secure Urostomy Tubing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the urostomy tubing for a resident was properly secured, which was necessary to prevent accidental dislodgment. This deficiency was identified during an observation of the resident, who was lying in bed with a urinary drainage bag hanging on the left side of the bed without a securement device. The resident, who had a urostomy due to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and urinary retention, also had a stage 4 pressure ulcer requiring frequent repositioning. Despite the care plan's directive to secure the urostomy catheter tubing, no securement device was observed during the survey. Interviews with staff, including an LPN and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the absence of a securement device for the resident's urostomy tubing. The LPN acknowledged the facility's use of securement devices to prevent catheter tubing from becoming loose and expressed uncertainty about why the resident did not have one in place. The DON confirmed the resident's urostomy and stated that some residents should have their catheter tubing secured to lock it in place, indicating a lapse in adherence to the care plan and facility protocols.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Sanitary Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain resident rooms in good repair and under clean and sanitary conditions, affecting two residents. For Resident #24, who has multiple cancer diagnoses and requires supervision to moderate assistance with ADLs, a soiled incontinence brief was observed hanging out of a trash bag and touching the top surface of the resident's bedside table. This was confirmed by an LPN who acknowledged that the soiled brief should have been discarded in the soiled utility room. For Resident #23, who has chronic respiratory failure, psychosis, mood disorder, immunodeficiency, and bipolar disorder, and requires maximum assistance with ADLs, the bathroom fan was found to be nonfunctional and dirty, with a hole behind the bathroom floor and stained ceiling tiles above the shower. Additionally, the wall behind the headboard of the bed had extensive scrapes. The resident's representative had reported these issues two months prior, but no action had been taken. The Maintenance Director and Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the observations and acknowledged awareness of the issues but could not recall to whom the concerns had been reported.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 962 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cincinnati
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanctuary Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 0.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Triple Creek Retirement Community | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Carecore At The Meadows | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Burlington House Rehab & Alzheimer's Care Center | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Alois Alzheimer's Care Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Veranda Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.