Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Gables Of Marysville Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to issue ABNs when skilled therapy ended: Five residents remained in the facility with Medicare benefit days remaining after therapy services were discontinued, and records showed NOMNCs were issued but no ABNs were documented. Social Services verified that the residents did not receive ABNs and that the facility had no documentation identifying the specific therapy services discontinued or their amount/frequency.
A CNA served meal trays, handled food and drink items, and fed two residents during meal service without performing hand hygiene. The CNA confirmed hand hygiene was not done while passing trays or before feeding residents, and the facility policy required proper hand hygiene to help prevent the spread of infections.
A CNA was observed feeding two dependent residents while standing beside them and then leaving to pass meal trays after giving each only one spoonful of food. One resident had dysphagia, dementia, and hearing loss and was dependent for eating, while the other had Parkinsonism and severe cognitive impairment with substantial to maximum assistance needed for eating.
A resident with Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and other chronic conditions was receiving hospice services and was documented as severely cognitively impaired. The record showed conflicting code status documentation, with a physician order for DNR-CC Arrest in the electronic record and a paper DNR form indicating DNR Comfort Care; the DON confirmed the electronic code status did not match the paper record and that the intended change to DNRCC was not entered until later.
Failure to Follow Up on Audiology Recommendations: A resident with cerebral infarction, anxiety, spinal stenosis, and atrial fibrillation did not receive documented follow-up after an audiology visit for hearing issues. The audiology note identified deeply impacted cerumen in the left ear and recommended Debrox or facility cerumen-management protocol, but the resident’s record had no order for ear drops or other cerumen management, and staff reported the audiologist did not notify them of the recommendation.
Failure to implement a pressure ulcer prevention intervention for a high-risk resident. The resident had multiple comorbidities, including malnutrition, PVD, weakness, and dementia, and had a Braden score indicating high risk for pressure ulcers. Although the care plan and MD orders directed staff to float the heels, surveyors observed the resident’s heels flat on the mattress while in bed, and an LPN confirmed the heels were not being floated.
Inadequate suprapubic catheter cleansing was identified for a resident with multiple chronic conditions, including CKD, diabetes, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and BPH with an indwelling suprapubic catheter. An LPN performed catheter care using saline-moistened gauze and confirmed only saline was used, while the DON stated the facility initially provided the wrong policy and was unsure what cleanser was facility-approved. The facility policy required catheter care in accordance with provider orders and infection prevention standards, including cleansing the insertion site with a facility-approved cleanser.
Infection control practices were not followed during tracheostomy care for a resident with chronic respiratory failure, malnutrition, and trach status. During the procedure, an RN failed to disinfect the bedside table, touched bed controls and a TV remote with gloved hands, contacted a nonsterile saline bottle and other nonsterile items while wearing sterile gloves, handled soiled trach ties with sterile gloves, and touched an opened gauze package before applying new gauze. The RN confirmed the care as observed, and the facility policy required hand hygiene, sterile technique, and maintaining sterility throughout trach care.
Pharmacy recommendations for a severely cognitively impaired resident with dementia, bipolar disorder, insomnia, anxiety, and depression were not timely addressed. The resident remained on Trazodone, Celexa, and Seroquel, with repeated pharmacy notes that the psychotropic regimen was due for a GDR and that no psych notes were available. Although the prescriber documented disagreement or referenced psychiatry, the DON confirmed psychiatry had not seen the resident until a later initial eval and that the pharmacy recommendations were not acted on when issued.
Failure to Use Required PPE for Residents in EBP: Staff did not wear gowns during direct care for two residents placed in EBP. An LPN administered GT meds and flushes to one resident without a gown, and another LPN performed catheter care for a second resident without a gown, despite EBP signage and PPE supplies being available. The DON confirmed gowns and gloves were required for direct care, and a CNA stated she was unsure what PPE to use and did not see door signs for EBP residents.
The facility failed to maintain proper food safety and sanitation standards, with undated food items in the walk-in cooler, dirty kitchen equipment, and incorrect sanitizer test strips. The dishwasher was not reaching the required sanitization temperature, and outdated bread was found in storage. The facility's policies on dishwashing and food storage were not adequately followed.
The facility failed to maintain its dishwasher, affecting all 95 residents. The dishwasher displayed an error message and failed to reach the required sanitizing temperature. The facility resorted to handwashing dishes and lacked proper sanitizer test strips. The policy required immediate corrective action and ceasing use if temperatures were inadequate.
A facility failed to complete a new PASARR for a resident who received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The resident had multiple existing conditions, including dementia with psychotic disturbance. Despite the new diagnosis, no new PASARR was conducted, and the facility lacks a policy on PASARR completion, as confirmed by staff interviews.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan after the extraction of all her top teeth. Despite the resident being cognitively intact and experiencing some bleeding and swelling, the care plan did not address her dental needs. Interviews confirmed the absence of a specific care plan for her dental condition, contrary to the facility's policy requiring updates with significant changes.
A resident with multiple health conditions and identified as a fall risk was not properly secured during transport, resulting in a fall and knee injuries. The driver, an STNA, had hit his head prior to the transport and failed to secure the resident's seatbelt. The incident was not documented in the log, and no further staff education was provided to prevent recurrence.
A facility failed to complete pharmacist-recommended AIMS assessments for a resident on antipsychotic medication. Despite recommendations for assessments in August and November, only two were completed in the first and fourth quarters. The DON confirmed the lapse, noting it as a standard practice without a formal policy.
Two residents were administered antibiotics without justification for urinary tract infections, as confirmed by the DON. Both residents were not listed on the infection control log, and neither exhibited symptoms of infection, violating the facility's antibiotic stewardship protocols.
A facility failed to retain and act on pharmacy recommendations for GDRs and lab tests for a resident with dementia. The pharmacy suggested a dose reduction for Quetiapine and a Depakote level check, but these were not followed up. The DON confirmed the physician was informed but did not order the lab test, and the facility could not locate the GDR request.
Failure to Issue ABNs When Therapy Services Ended
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABNs) to five residents (#03, #59, #62, #65, and #99) who remained in the facility after skilled therapy services were discontinued while Medicare benefit days were still remaining. For each of these residents, the record showed that a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) had been issued with a specified cut date, but no ABN was present in the medical record. The review of the electronic medical record (Point Click Care) found no evidence that ABNs had been issued to any of the identified residents at the time therapy services were discontinued. The record review also noted that Resident #99’s therapy was discontinued per patient request, while the other identified residents remained in the facility after therapy ended. During interview, Social Services #107 verified that the residents had Medicare benefit days remaining and that the facility issued NOMNCs, but residents did not receive ABNs. She further stated that the facility had no documentation identifying which specific therapy services were discontinued or the amount or frequency of the services, and there was no additional documentation available regarding ABNs.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene During Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during meal service and when feeding residents in the 100/200/300 halls dining room. During observation of the meal service, one CNA served meal trays to residents, removed plates and silverware from trays, opened lids, opened food items and condiment packages, opened soda cans, and poured soda into cups of ice while passing a total of 15 meal trays to residents. During the same meal service, the CNA fed two residents without performing hand hygiene between residents or before feeding them. The CNA was observed feeding one resident a portion of her meal and then moving to another resident and feeding her a portion of her meal, with no hand hygiene performed before either feeding. When interviewed afterward, the CNA verified that hand hygiene had not been performed while passing meal trays or before feeding the two residents. The facility’s hand hygiene policy stated that hand hygiene is to be properly performed to help prevent the spread of infections.
Dignified Feeding Not Provided to Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure dependent residents were fed in a dignified manner. Resident #09 had diagnoses including dysphagia, chronic pain, dementia, and hearing loss, and a quarterly MDS showed severely impaired cognition and dependence on staff for eating. Resident #52 had diagnoses including Parkinsonism, major depressive disorder, and psychotic disturbance, and a quarterly MDS showed severely impaired cognition and a need for substantial to maximum assistance with eating. During dining observation, CNA #217 was seen standing beside Resident #09 in a tilt wheelchair, feeding one spoonful of food, then moving to Resident #52 at the same table and feeding one spoonful while standing before leaving to pass more meal trays. During interview, CNA #217 confirmed she had stood while feeding both residents, and she also confirmed that neither resident had been fed any more of their meal since the observation time.
Mismatch Between Electronic and Paper Code Status Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure discrepancies in a resident's code status were identified and corrected in a timely manner. Resident #80 was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorder, vascular dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and adult failure to thrive, and was later documented as severely cognitively impaired and receiving hospice services for terminal early-onset Alzheimer's disease. The record showed a physician order for Do Not Resuscitate - CC Arrest beginning 04/23/20, while a DNR form dated 11/28/25 showed the guardian elected DNR Comfort Care, which refuses resuscitation measures. The care plan dated 12/01/25 reflected hospice services, and a physician order dated 02/02/26 later documented DNR Comfort Care. During interview, the DON stated an audit identified that the resident's code status in the electronic record did not match the paper documentation and confirmed the intent was to change the code status to DNRCC when the resident transitioned to hospice on 11/28/25. The DON also stated that all licensed nursing staff are responsible for ensuring a resident's physician-ordered code status matches the corresponding paper record.
Failure to Follow Up on Audiology Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide follow-up care related to audiology services for one resident who was cognitively intact and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living, including supervision for eating, substantial assistance for toileting and bathing, and partial assistance for personal hygiene. The resident had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record showed no documentation of an audiology visit in the prior three months, and the resident stated that someone had checked his ears several weeks earlier because of hearing issues and said ear drops would be ordered for his left ear, but he had not received any ear drops since then. Staff interviews confirmed the resident had consented to ancillary services, but he was not on the January audiology visit list. The LSW later verified the resident had an audiology visit and that the facility had not received the provider note at the time, with no documentation of the visit in the resident’s record. The audiology progress note showed deeply impacted cerumen in the left ear and recommended Debrox or facility cerumen-management protocol, but there was no order for Debrox or any other cerumen management in the medical record. The LSW stated the audiologist left after the visit without informing staff of the recommendation, and the DON stated she had received the audiology note by email but would not provide it.
Failure to Float Heels for a High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a pressure ulcer/injury prevention intervention for one resident who was at high risk for skin breakdown. The resident was admitted with chronic respiratory failure, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, heart failure, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease, and dementia. The care plan identified the resident as at risk for altered skin integrity related to falls, impaired mobility, and prolonged pressure to bony prominences, with an intervention to encourage and assist heel elevation when in bed as needed or tolerated. A Braden Scale assessment showed a score of 11, indicating high risk for pressure ulcers/injuries, and the physician’s orders included encouraging or assisting the resident to float heels off the bed as tolerated. Although a sign above the bed stated to float the resident’s heels, surveyors observed the resident’s heels lying flat on the mattress while in bed, and an LPN confirmed the heels were not floated and then placed a pillow under the resident’s knees to float the heels.
Inadequate suprapubic catheter cleansing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate catheter cleansing was provided for one resident during suprapubic catheter care. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. The care plan identified altered elimination related to obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease stage three, and indwelling suprapubic catheter use, with interventions for suprapubic catheter care every shift and changing the catheter and emptying the catheter bag every shift. The physician order directed catheter care every shift, including cleansing and applying a split drain dressing to the catheter insertion site. During observation of catheter care, an LPN performed the procedure using saline-moistened gauze to cleanse the skin around the suprapubic catheter and the catheter tubing, discarding each piece after use, and then placed split gauze around the insertion site. The LPN confirmed the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions due to suprapubic catheter status and stated only saline was used for catheter care, not soap. During interview, the DON stated the incorrect catheter care policy had initially been provided and, after review of the correct policy, was unsure what the facility-approved cleanser was. The facility policy stated catheter care should be provided in accordance with physician/provider orders and infection prevention standards, including cleaning the insertion site with a facility-approved cleanser.
Infection Control Lapses During Tracheostomy Care
Penalty
Summary
Appropriate infection control practices were not followed during tracheostomy care for one resident with chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, palliative care status, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and tracheostomy status. The resident’s record showed a plan of care for infection risk related to the tracheostomy and physician orders for ongoing tracheostomy care and monitoring. During observation of tracheostomy care, the RN washed hands in a bathroom sink, donned PPE, and gathered supplies, but did not disinfect the bedside table before placing supplies on it. The RN then touched bed controls with gloved hands and handled gauze at the tracheostomy site with the same gloves. After opening sterile supplies and changing gloves, the RN touched the outside of a nonsterile saline bottle and then sterile cleaning swabs, and used those gloves at the tracheostomy site. The RN also touched the outside of new tracheostomy ties and the television remote control before applying the ties, handled soiled ties with sterile gloves, and later touched the outside of an opened gauze package before applying new gauze. The RN confirmed the care was performed as observed. The facility policy required tracheostomy care to follow infection prevention and control practices, including hand hygiene, sterile technique, and maintaining sterility of sterile supplies.
Pharmacy Recommendations for Psychotropic Medications Were Not Timely Addressed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and acted upon for one resident, who had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, senile degeneration of the brain, bipolar disorder, insomnia, and anxiety disorder and was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's quarterly MDS assessments showed use of an antipsychotic and an antidepressant, and the last documented GDR occurred on 11/05/24. Pharmacy recommendations dated 02/26/25, 05/12/25, and 11/11/25 each identified that the resident remained on Trazodone, Celexa, and Seroquel, noted no adverse effects and no psychiatric service notes, and stated the resident was due for a GDR. The prescriber responses documented disagreement or other comments, including notes that the resident was followed by psychiatry or that nursing should consult psychiatry, but the DON later confirmed psychiatric notes prior to 01/08/26 could not be located and that the resident was not seen by psychiatry until the initial comprehensive psychiatric evaluation on 01/08/26. The DON also confirmed that the pharmacy statements indicating the psychotropic regimen was being managed by psychiatry were not accurate at the time and that orders were not placed to obtain a psychiatry consult, so the pharmacy recommendations were not addressed timely when issued.
Failure to Use Required PPE for Residents in Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate PPE for residents placed in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Resident #74 had diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, metabolic encephalopathy, heart failure, and ischemic cardiomyopathy, and had a physician order for EBP every shift. During observation, an LPN entered Resident #74’s room to administer medication via gastrostomy tube, left the room to retrieve items, returned, and administered GT medications and a 30 mL flush without wearing a gown. The LPN later verified the resident was in EBP and that she did not wear a gown during the GT medication administration. Resident #01 had diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. The care plan and physician order indicated EBP related to an indwelling suprapubic catheter, and the resident’s MDS showed the resident had an indwelling catheter and required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting. During observation, an LPN performed catheter care without donning a gown, despite PPE supplies being located outside the room and an EBP sign posted on the door frame. The DON verified that gowns and gloves should be worn when providing direct care to residents in EBP, and a CNA stated she was not aware of what PPE to wear for different types of resident care and that there were no signs on EBP residents’ doors to instruct staff.
Deficiencies in Food Safety and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper food safety and sanitation standards, as observed during a survey. The walk-in cooler contained undated food items, including macaroni salad and a pudding substance with orange slices, as well as unmarked plastic bags with food items brought from home. The kitchen was not maintained in a clean condition, with debris such as a straw, sour cream container, napkins, a burger, and a can of soda found on the floor behind equipment. The soda dispenser and coffee station were also found to be dirty, with the Executive Chef acknowledging that these areas had not been cleaned recently. The facility did not have the correct sanitizer test strips for the three-compartment sink, using pH test strips instead of the required quat sanitizer test strips. The dishwasher was not functioning properly, with the temperature test stickers indicating that the machine was not reaching the required sanitization temperature. Despite this, the facility continued to use the dishwasher for large items that did not fit in the sink, while handwashing other items. The Executive Chef admitted to not having a temperature log for each dishwashing cycle and running out of test stickers. Additionally, the facility's policies were not adequately followed or enforced. The cleaning schedule indicated that certain areas were only cleaned monthly, and there was no policy for employee food storage. The facility's policies on dishwashing machine use and food storage were not adhered to, as evidenced by the lack of proper temperature monitoring and the presence of outdated bread in the dry storage area. The Executive Chef confirmed that the facility did not have the appropriate test strips and that the dishwasher's gauges were not functioning, leading to uncertainty about the effectiveness of the sanitization process.
Dishwasher Maintenance Failure
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dishwasher in working order, which had the potential to affect all 95 residents. During an observation, the dishwasher displayed an error message indicating it was too hot, and the gauges were not moving. The Executive Chef confirmed that the facility uses a high-temperature sanitizing dishwasher and expected a temperature of 185 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit. However, when tested with a temperature test sticker, the dishwasher failed to reach the required temperature of 160 degrees Fahrenheit, as indicated by the sticker remaining white. Further interviews revealed that the dishwasher was not fixed, and the facility resorted to handwashing dishes. The Executive Chef mentioned that a part needed to be ordered for the dishwasher, and they continued to use it for large items that did not fit in the three-compartment sink. The facility lacked the correct sanitizer test strips, and there was no temperature log for each dishwashing cycle, only a daily test sticker log that ended in early May. The facility's policy required immediate corrective action if sanitizer concentrations were too low and mandated ceasing the use of the dishwasher if temperatures or chemical sanitation concentrations did not meet requirements.
Failure to Complete New PASARR for Resident with New Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a new Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident who received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, chronic systolic heart failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, was later diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Despite this new diagnosis, the facility did not conduct a new PASARR, as confirmed by the Admissions - Discharge Coordinator. Additionally, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility lacks a policy on PASARR completion.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Dental Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the care plan for a resident following the extraction of all her top teeth. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, had her top teeth removed and was experiencing some bleeding and swelling. Despite these changes, the care plan did not reflect the resident's dental needs or the fact that her top teeth had been extracted. The resident was set up to assist with meals and was eating well, but there was no care plan addressing her dental condition. Interviews with the resident and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the absence of a care plan related to the dental extractions. The resident mentioned that she had not yet received her dentures and was waiting for a fitting in July. The DON acknowledged that multiple nurses were responsible for care plans and verified that there was no specific care plan regarding the resident's dental needs after the extractions. The facility's policy requires that care plans be updated with significant changes in a resident's condition, but this was not done in this case.
Failure to Secure Resident During Transport Leads to Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to safely transport a resident, resulting in a fall. The resident, who has epilepsy, diabetes type two, obesity, heart disease, kidney disease, and osteoarthritis, was identified as a fall risk and requires a wheelchair for ambulation. During a transport to an outside physician appointment, the resident was not properly secured in the transportation vehicle, leading to a fall. The driver, a State tested Nurse Aide (STNA), admitted to hitting his head on a bar in the bus before the transport and could not recall securing the resident's seatbelt. The resident reported falling forward out of the wheelchair and scraping her knees, which were later observed to have healed. The incident log did not document the fall, and the facility's fall investigation confirmed the driver's failure to secure the seatbelt due to his injury. The Director of Nursing (DON) verified the incident and acknowledged that the driver was educated not to drive if injured. However, no further education was provided to prevent similar incidents. The resident's family was not notified, as the resident is considered her own person and first contact for emergencies. The deficiency highlights a lapse in ensuring resident safety during transport, as well as inadequate documentation and follow-up education for staff.
Failure to Complete Pharmacist-Recommended AIMS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all pharmacist recommendations were completed regarding antipsychotic medication assessments for a resident. The resident, who was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, was prescribed Risperidone for this condition. The pharmacist recommended that an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment be completed for the Risperidone on two occasions, in August 2023 and November 2023. However, the nursing staff did not follow through with these recommendations. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that AIMS assessments are to be completed quarterly for all residents on antipsychotic medications as a standard of practice, although there was no formal policy in place. For the resident in question, only one AIMS assessment was completed in the first quarter of 2023 and another in the fourth quarter, failing to meet the recommended schedule. This oversight was verified by the DON, indicating a lapse in adherence to the pharmacist's recommendations and the facility's standard practices.
Failure to Prevent Unnecessary Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary medications, affecting two residents. Resident #13, who has diagnoses including epilepsy, diabetes type two, obesity, heart disease, kidney disease, and osteoarthritis, was prescribed Macrobid as a prophylactic antibiotic for recurrent urinary tract infections. However, the infection control log did not list Resident #13 as having a urinary tract infection, and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the resident did not exhibit any signs or symptoms of infection. The prescribed antibiotic did not align with the facility's antibiotic stewardship protocols. Similarly, Resident #72, diagnosed with dementia, kidney disease, diabetes type two, failure to thrive, and urgency of urine, was also prescribed an antibiotic, Cephalexin, for recurrent urinary tract infections. Like Resident #13, Resident #72 was not listed on the infection control log for a urinary tract infection, and the DON confirmed the absence of infection symptoms. The use of the antibiotic was not justified according to the facility's protocols, indicating a failure to adhere to appropriate medication administration practices.
Failure to Follow Pharmacy Recommendations for GDRs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations for Gradual Dose Reductions (GDRs) and laboratory recommendations were retained and provided to the physician, affecting one resident out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #22, who was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, was prescribed psychotropic medications. The pharmacy recommended a dose reduction for Quetiapine and a Depakote level to be drawn, but there was no follow-up on these recommendations. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the physician was informed but did not order the Depakote level, as the medication was used for behaviors rather than seizures. Additionally, the facility was unable to locate the GDR request from the pharmacy. The facility's policy requires collaboration with a licensed pharmacist to ensure timely and appropriate pharmacy services, including conducting monthly medication regimen reviews, but this was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 397 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Marysville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milcrest Nursing Center | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Prestige Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Als Woodstock Inc | 9.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| The Convalarium Of Dublin | 15 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Arbors At Delaware | 15.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 35 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Gables Of Marysville Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.