Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Ohio Living Cape May during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not complete thorough investigations into several allegations of physical and sexual abuse. In one case, two residents were involved in a physical altercation, but the investigation only included a CNA statement and no injury assessment or resident interviews. In another, a resident reported a rape-related dream after being toileted by a CNA, yet no additional staff statements or skin assessment were obtained. In a third incident, a resident alleged being hit, but the facility relied on observations that the resident was combative and that staff behaved professionally, without performing a skin assessment or interviewing all staff on that shift. The Administrator confirmed these investigative omissions, which were inconsistent with the facility’s abuse investigation policy.
A resident with a surgical wound was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) with a care plan and door signage indicating EBP were required, but an LPN provided treatment to a skin tear on the resident’s arm without wearing a gown, stating gowns were only needed for the surgical wound. The DON confirmed staff should wear gloves and gowns for patient care under EBP, and facility policy and CDC guidance required gown use during high-contact resident care for residents with wounds, leading surveyors to cite a deficiency in the infection prevention and control program.
Failure to Conduct Thorough Abuse Investigations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct thorough investigations into multiple allegations of physical and sexual abuse as required by its Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Crime Reporting policy. For an incident involving two residents in which one resident was found with his fist raised and hand on the other resident’s wrist after the second resident wandered into his room, the investigation was limited to obtaining a CNA’s statement and noting no physical signs of harm. The facility did not assess the resident who had entered the room for injuries and did not obtain statements from either resident involved about what occurred, despite the policy outlining that investigations may include resident interviews and examinations for marks, bruises, or other indications of abuse. In a separate allegation where a resident told a nurse she dreamed of someone raping her, the investigation identified that a CNA had toileted the resident shortly before the statement and documented that the resident later described having crazy dreams and could not recall events from the prior night. However, the facility did not obtain additional staff statements or perform a skin assessment on the resident. In another incident, a resident alleged someone had hit her earlier in the day; the investigation documented that the resident had refused care, was combative, and that a nurse and a CNA’s family member believed the CNA involved would not hit the resident and had remained professional. The facility did not complete a skin assessment on the resident or obtain staff interviews from that shift. The Administrator confirmed in interviews that these investigative steps were not completed in each of these cases, contrary to the facility’s own investigation process expectations.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During High-Contact Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s infection prevention and control program related to the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a wound. Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses including an orthopedic surgery fracture of the neck of the right femur with routine healing and a malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus. An MDS assessment showed the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with toileting and bathing, and supervision with personal hygiene. The resident’s record contained flags indicating EBP were in place, and the care plan documented that EBP would be maintained per facility policy related to a surgical wound. During an observation, surveyors noted a sign on the resident’s door indicating EBP, while an LPN provided care to a skin tear on the resident’s right arm without wearing a gown. The LPN confirmed she was not wearing a gown and stated that a gown was only needed when performing care on the surgical wound, not for this type of care. The DON later confirmed that staff should be wearing gloves and gowns when providing patient care for residents on EBP. Facility policy on Enhanced Barrier Precautions required wearing a gown during high-contact resident care, and CDC guidance described EBP as targeted gown and glove use during high-contact care activities for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of MDRO status. This failure to follow EBP requirements for gown use during high-contact care constituted the cited deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 271 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Wilmington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilmington Nursing & Rehab | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Continental Manor Nurs And Rehabilitation Center | 12.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Autumn Years Nursing Center | 12.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Laurels Of Blanchester, The | 13.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Ohio Living Quaker Heights | 13.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Ohio Living Cape May.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.