Heritage Healthcare Of Euclid
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Euclid, Ohio.
- Location
- 3 Gateway Dr, Euclid, Ohio 44119
- CMS Provider Number
- 365730
- Inspections on file
- 25
- Latest survey
- December 10, 2025
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 1
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Heritage Healthcare Of Euclid during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Multiple residents reported cold rooms and discomfort, with temperature readings in several areas falling below the facility's required range. Staff confirmed incomplete repairs, such as unpainted walls and missing baseboards, and acknowledged the lack of thermostats in resident rooms. Environmental deficiencies, including damaged walls and inadequate heat distribution, were observed and verified by both maintenance and administrative staff.
A resident with a history of cerebral infarction and dementia was left in a wheelchair for several hours without receiving incontinence care, resulting in skin breakdown. The resident, dependent on staff for daily living activities, was found with a soiled incontinence brief. CNA and RN assistance revealed improper perineal care and a small open wound, causing the resident pain. The facility's perineal care policy was not followed, leading to this deficiency.
The facility failed to provide evidence of water testing for Legionella bacteria, potentially affecting all 65 residents. Despite having a Legionella Water Management Program, the facility lacked documentation of regular testing. The Administrator confirmed the absence of evidence, and the Maintenance Director noted delays in receiving test results and missing records from the previous director. CDC guidance requires regular monitoring, which the facility did not demonstrate.
The facility failed to maintain a safe and clean environment, with issues such as discolored carpeting, exposed pipes, and debris in various areas. Resident equipment was also neglected, with one resident's wheelchair covered in debris and another's missing an armrest. Interviews confirmed these deficiencies, and the facility's cleaning policy was not followed.
The facility failed to properly label and store insulin, affecting five residents. Observations revealed that insulin pens and vials were not dated when opened, some were past expiration, and one was stored in the wrong container. An LPN and the ADON confirmed these deficiencies, which violated the facility's policy on insulin storage.
The facility failed to store food safely, affecting six residents. Containers of applesauce and pudding were found undated and warm in a medication cart. An LPN used these for residents with swallowing difficulties. Facility policy required such foods to be dated and stored at 41°F or lower, which was not followed.
A facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity during feeding. A resident with severe cognitive impairment and on a dysphasia puree diet was observed being fed by an STNA who was standing, contrary to proper protocol. The STNA admitted awareness of the requirement to sit while feeding residents.
The facility did not disburse a deceased resident's personal funds within the required 30-day period. The resident's funds account showed checks were issued to the Attorney General and to cover the resident's account balance, but not within the mandated timeframe. The Administrator confirmed awareness of the delay in disbursing the funds.
A facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a resident who was found with facial injuries after a lighter allegedly exploded in their room. Despite the resident's report, the incident was not filed with the Ohio Department of Health as required by the facility's policy.
A facility failed to transmit a resident's discharge MDS assessment data to CMS within the required 14 days. The resident, who did not return from an authorized leave of absence, had their assessment completed but not transmitted until several months later. This was confirmed by the DON, an LPN, and a Social Worker during interviews.
A facility failed to complete a timely PASARR Level I screen for a resident who stayed longer than 30 days. The resident, admitted with schizophrenia, COPD, and high blood pressure, was cognitively intact and required minimal assistance. The PASARR was completed months late, as confirmed by a social worker.
A facility did not timely act on a pharmacist's recommendations for a resident prescribed carvedilol, failing to ensure pulse monitoring before administration. Despite the pharmacist's advice to update the order entry and educate staff, the facility did not implement these changes, as confirmed by the DON.
A facility failed to monitor a resident's vital signs before administering carvedilol, as ordered. The resident, with diagnoses including visual hallucinations and bipolar disorder, was prescribed the medication with specific parameters for blood pressure and heart rate. However, from September 2023 to February 2024, no vital signs were documented before administration. A pharmacist noted this lapse and recommended system updates and staff education. The DON confirmed the oversight, which violated the facility's medication administration policy.
The facility did not display required contact information for the State Survey Agency and other pertinent agencies, affecting all 65 residents. The Administrator confirmed the absence of these postings during an interview.
The facility did not ensure that daily nursing staffing information was current and visible to residents and visitors. The information was outdated and located in a non-prominent area, as confirmed by a receptionist.
A resident developed new, in-house acquired bilateral heel pressure ulcers due to the facility's failure to implement proper prevention, treatment, and interventions. The resident, who was cognitively impaired and at risk for pressure ulcer development, did not receive consistent turning, repositioning, or heel protection as required, leading to actual harm.
The facility failed to provide proper and timely incontinence care for three residents, leading to significant deficiencies. One resident was found with two soaked incontinence briefs and a dirty bed, another had feces under her fingernails and soiled items on the floor, and a third was found with two saturated briefs and a wet bed. The STNAs involved did not follow proper procedures, and the facility's perineal care policy was not adhered to.
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with severe cognitive impairment had an individualized care plan to manage his dementia symptoms and prevent wandering into other residents' rooms. This led to multiple incidents of distress and physical altercations with other residents, including one resident sustaining a fracture in his right hand.
Failure to Maintain Homelike Environment and Adequate Room Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by multiple observations and interviews. Several residents reported that their rooms were cold, requiring them to wear extra clothing or request additional blankets. Temperature measurements in various rooms showed inconsistent and often inadequate heating, with some areas registering as low as 56 to 65 degrees Fahrenheit, below the facility's stated comfort range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. Maintenance staff confirmed the lack of thermostats in resident rooms and noted that repairs and updates, such as painting walls and installing baseboards, were incomplete due to staff being reassigned to other buildings. Observations also revealed physical deficiencies in the environment, including long black marks, gashes in walls, peeling wallpaper, and missing baseboards in bathrooms. Interviews with residents and staff further confirmed the ongoing issues with room temperatures and the unfinished state of repairs. Residents consistently expressed discomfort due to the cold and dissatisfaction with the delayed maintenance. Both maintenance staff and the regional director of operations acknowledged the environmental deficiencies, including the need for painting, baseboard installation, and improved heat distribution. The facility's own policy requires a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment with comfortable and safe temperatures, which was not maintained for the affected residents.
Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care Leads to Skin Breakdown
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for Resident #29, resulting in skin breakdown. Resident #29, who has a history of cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia, was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the common area for several hours without receiving incontinence care. The resident is dependent on staff for activities of daily living and is frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. On the day of the observation, Resident #29 was left in the common area from 8:30 A.M. until 1:12 P.M. without receiving incontinence care. When CNA #400 and RN #401 finally assisted the resident to bed, they discovered a large amount of urine and feces in the resident's incontinence brief. During the cleaning process, CNA #400 did not follow proper perineal care procedures, using the same washcloth multiple times and wiping in a manner that could spread contamination. A small open area with a reddish-pink wound bed was found in the crease of the resident's right thigh and buttock, which caused the resident pain when touched. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the incontinence care provided by CNA #400 was not performed correctly. The facility's policy on perineal care emphasizes the importance of cleanliness, comfort, and prevention of skin breakdown, which was not adhered to in this instance. The deficiency was identified during an investigation under Master Complaint Number OH00160445 and Complaint Number OH00159858.
Failure to Provide Evidence of Legionella Water Testing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide evidence of water testing conducted to monitor and prevent the growth of Legionella bacteria in the building water system, which could potentially affect all 65 residents. During the entrance conference, the facility was unable to provide documentation of regular Legionella testing, despite having a policy titled 'Legionella Water Management Program' revised in September 2022. An interview with the Administrator confirmed the absence of documented evidence of water testing. The Maintenance Director stated that water testing was conducted and samples were sent out, but results took two to three weeks to return. Additionally, the facility was unable to locate records from the previous maintenance director, leaving them without evidence of routine water testing. The CDC guidance reviewed requires regular monitoring of key areas for potentially hazardous conditions, which the facility failed to demonstrate.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Clean Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and well-maintained environment, as observed during an environmental tour. The carpeting throughout the facility was significantly discolored and stained, and the ceiling in the 400 hall dining room was covered with plastic sheeting due to a previous collapse. The 300 and 400 Hall tub room had drilled-out holes exposing rusted pipes and cobwebs. The 100 and 200 Hall nurses' station had an uncovered ceiling light, and the tub room had a brown substance on the floor and various debris, including an open ketchup packet. The laundry area had multiple ceiling tiles missing, exposing piping, and light covers throughout the facility contained dead insects. Additionally, several residents' rooms had issues such as dried tube feeding supplement on a pole, exposed nails, holes in bathroom doors, and stained privacy curtains. The facility also failed to maintain resident equipment properly. Resident #12's electric wheelchair was found with food debris and dust, and Resident #56's wheelchair was missing an armrest and had cracked vinyl exposing the padding. Interviews with the Maintenance Director and Director of Nursing confirmed these observations. The facility's policy on cleaning and disinfection of resident-care equipment was not followed, as staff were responsible for cleaning visibly soiled equipment but failed to do so.
Improper Insulin Labeling and Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of insulin, affecting five residents who receive insulin treatment. During an observation, it was found that a used injector pen of Humalog insulin for one resident was stored in a medication cart without a date indicating when it was opened. A Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed that all insulin pens should be dated upon opening, and verified that the insulin pen in question was not dated. Further observations revealed additional issues with insulin storage and labeling. Two residents had used injector pens of Lispro insulin stored in a medication cart without dates indicating when they were opened. Additionally, an open vial of Lispro insulin for another resident was found to be past its expiration date, and a vial of Humalog insulin for a different resident was stored in a box labeled for another resident. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed these findings and acknowledged that insulin generally expires 28 days after opening, as per the facility's policy.
Improper Food Storage in Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner, affecting six residents on the 300 and 400 units. During an observation, four containers of applesauce without dates and a container of pudding dated four days prior were found in the top drawer of the medication cart. These containers were warm to the touch, indicating improper storage. An LPN stated that the containers were already in the cart when she arrived and used them for residents who had difficulty swallowing medications. The facility's policy required that time and temperature-controlled foods, such as applesauce and pudding, be dated and stored at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or lower, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Feeding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat a resident with dignity during feeding, as observed by surveyors. Resident #48, who has diagnoses including cerebral infarction, seizures, dementia, and dysphasia, was admitted on an unspecified date and has severely impaired cognition according to a quarterly MDS assessment. The resident was ordered a dysphasia puree texture diet and required feeding assistance with all meals. During an observation, the resident was in a Broda chair with a plate of puree food. A State tested Nurse Aide (STNA) was seen standing while feeding the resident, which the STNA acknowledged was against proper protocol, as she should have been seated to feed the resident.
Failure to Disburse Deceased Resident's Funds Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to disburse the personal funds of a deceased resident within the required 30-day timeframe. The medical record review indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility and subsequently passed away. Upon reviewing the resident's funds account, it was found that a check for $90.56 was sent to the Attorney General and another check for $1,768.00 was issued to cover the balance due on the resident's account. However, these actions were not completed within the 30-day period following the resident's death. An interview with the Administrator confirmed that the personal funds of the resident were not disbursed within the mandated timeframe. The Administrator acknowledged awareness of the issue regarding the delay in issuing the checks within the 30-day limit.
Failure to Report Allegation of Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse, neglect, or injury of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency as required. This deficiency affected a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, high blood pressure, and nicotine dependence. The resident was cognitively intact and required assistance for activities of daily living. On a specific date, the resident was found with swollen nose and lips, surrounded by a small amount of dry blood, and reported that a lighter had exploded in their face during the early morning hours. Despite this incident, no report was filed with the Ohio Department of Health's Enhanced Information Dissemination Collection System. The facility's policy mandates that all incidents and allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property, as well as injuries of unknown source, must be reported immediately to the Administrator or designee. In cases involving allegations of abuse or serious bodily injury, the report should be made to the Ohio Department of Health immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made. An interview with the Administrator confirmed that the facility did not file the required report for the resident's allegations, thus failing to comply with the policy and state requirements.
Failure to Timely Transmit MDS Assessment Data
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system within the required 14 days of completing the assessment. This deficiency affected one of the three residents reviewed for discharge. Specifically, the medical record for Resident #2 showed that a discharge MDS assessment was completed but not transmitted by the deadline. Resident #2 was discharged after failing to return from an authorized leave of absence on January 1, 2024. The Director of Nursing, a Licensed Practical Nurse, and a Social Worker confirmed during interviews that the resident did not return from the leave of absence and that the discharge MDS assessment was not transmitted until June 26, 2024.
Delayed PASARR Screening for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a timely completion of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screen for a resident who remained in the facility for more than 30 days. This deficiency affected one of the two residents reviewed for PASARR compliance. The resident in question was admitted with diagnoses including schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and high blood pressure. Despite being cognitively intact and requiring minimal assistance with activities of daily living, the PASARR was not completed until several months after admission. This delay was confirmed by a social worker during an interview.
Failure to Implement Pharmacist's Recommendations for Medication Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to act promptly on a pharmacist's recommendations regarding medication administration for a resident. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including visual hallucinations, repeated falls, and bipolar disorder, was prescribed carvedilol for hypertension. The pharmacist noted that the nursing staff was not documenting blood pressure and pulse before administering the medication, as required by the physician's order. Despite the pharmacist's recommendation to update the order entry to ensure compliance and educate the nursing staff, the facility did not implement the necessary changes in a timely manner. The resident's medication administration record for March 2024 showed that while blood pressure monitoring was added and completed, pulse monitoring was not conducted as recommended. A subsequent pharmacist recommendation in April 2024 reiterated the lack of pulse monitoring. The Director of Nursing confirmed in an interview that the facility did not respond promptly to the pharmacist's notification about the failure to obtain the resident's pulse before administering carvedilol.
Failure to Monitor Vital Signs Before Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately monitor a resident's vital signs before administering a medication as ordered. Resident #40, who was admitted with diagnoses including visual hallucinations, repeated falls, and bipolar disorder, was prescribed carvedilol for hypertension. The physician's order specified that the medication should be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure was below 100 mmHg or if the heart rate was below 60 beats per minute. However, a review of the resident's medication administration records from September 2023 to February 2024 revealed that no blood pressure or pulse measurements were documented prior to administering the medication, as required by the physician's order. The deficiency was further highlighted by a pharmacist's recommendation in March 2024, which noted that nursing staff had stopped taking and documenting the necessary vital signs before administering the medication. The pharmacist recommended updating the order entry system to ensure compliance and educating the nursing staff on the importance of checking parameters attached to medication orders. An interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed that the nursing staff did not obtain the required vital signs before administering carvedilol during the specified period. The facility's policy on administering medications, dated April 2019, mandates that medications be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frames.
Failure to Post Required Contact Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all required postings, including contact information for the State Survey Agency and other pertinent agencies and advocacy groups, were displayed in a manner that was accessible and understandable to residents and their representatives. This deficiency was observed during a facility inspection conducted on June 26, 2024, between 2:45 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. The absence of these postings had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. During an interview at 3:10 P.M. on the same day, the Administrator confirmed that the required information was not posted.
Failure to Post Current Nursing Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that daily nursing staffing information was up-to-date and posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. During an observation on June 24, 2024, at 8:45 A.M., it was noted that the nursing staff information was located on a bulletin board inside a staffing information area near the front desk, which was not visible to residents and visitors. Additionally, the posted nursing staffing information was outdated, with the last update being on June 14, 2024. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with a receptionist, who verified that the information was neither current nor visible to residents or visitors.
Failure to Prevent and Treat Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure individualized care planned interventions were developed and followed to prevent a resident from developing pressure ulcers and failed to ensure the pressure ulcers were timely identified, properly treated, and interventions were initiated to promote healing. Resident #17, who was cognitively impaired and at risk for pressure ulcer development, developed new, in-house acquired bilateral heel pressure ulcers that were first assessed to be unstageable. The facility did not implement proper prevention, treatment, and interventions, which led to actual harm to the resident on 01/06/24. Resident #17's care plan dated 10/18/23 included interventions such as a pressure-reducing cushion to the chair and mattress to the bed but lacked specific interventions related to turning, repositioning, or offloading heels from the mattress. The resident's Braden Scale dated 12/16/23 revealed a moderate risk for developing a pressure ulcer, but no additional care plans or interventions were related to the resident's bilateral pressure ulcers until 03/04/24, two months after the pressure ulcers were identified. The facility's records and observations showed that the resident was not consistently turned, repositioned, or provided with heel protectors as ordered. Observations and interviews revealed that Resident #17 frequently slid down in bed, with heels resting directly on the mattress and against the footboard, without wearing Prevalon boots or lying on a low air loss mattress. The facility staff, including LPNs and STNAs, confirmed the lack of proper interventions and care for the resident's pressure ulcers. The facility's documentation and physician orders were inconsistent and incomplete, leading to inadequate treatment and care for the resident's pressure ulcers. The facility's policy on pressure injury prevention and management was not followed, resulting in the resident's condition worsening and the development of additional pressure ulcers.
Failure to Provide Proper Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper and timely incontinence care for three residents, leading to significant deficiencies in their care. Resident #55, who was always incontinent of urine and bowel and dependent on staff for all ADLs, was found wearing two soaked incontinence briefs, with a wet draw sheet and a dirty fitted sheet. The STNA confirmed the use of two briefs due to the resident being a heavy wetter and proceeded to replace them with another set of two briefs, one of which was modified to act as a liner. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that using two incontinence briefs was not acceptable and required immediate staff education. Resident #1, who had severe cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of urine and bowel, was found in a bathroom with feces under her fingernails and a strong odor of feces and urine in the room. The resident's bed had a large wet spot on the bare mattress, and dirty sheets and incontinence briefs were found on the floor. The STNA assisting Resident #1 confirmed the presence of the soiled items and stated that the resident often removed her incontinence briefs. The STNA was vague about the last time incontinence care was provided to Resident #1. Resident #24, who was cognitively intact but always incontinent of urine and bowel, was found with two saturated incontinence briefs, a wet draw sheet, and a large dried urine ring on the fitted sheet. The STNA confirmed the use of two briefs to prevent leaks and stated that the resident preferred a larger brief. The resident expressed discomfort from lying in urine and not thinking to use the call light for assistance. The STNA did not change gloves between tasks and used the same soapy water for incontinence care and cleaning the resident's face, acknowledging the oversight when it was pointed out. The facility's policy on perineal care was not followed in these instances, leading to the deficiencies noted in the report.
Failure to Manage Dementia Symptoms and Prevent Wandering
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #45, who had severe cognitive impairment due to dementia, had an individualized care plan with appropriate interventions to manage his symptoms and prevent wandering into other residents' rooms. Despite multiple progress notes indicating that Resident #45 required continuous supervision and redirection due to his wandering behavior, the care plan only included general interventions such as reorienting and redirecting as needed. This lack of specific interventions led to several incidents where Resident #45 entered other residents' rooms, causing distress and physical altercations with other residents, including Resident #10 and Resident #53. On one occasion, Resident #45 wandered into Resident #10's room and began going through his belongings, leading to a verbal and physical altercation. Resident #10, who also had dementia, hit Resident #45 on the head with his cane to get him out of the room. Both residents were separated, and Resident #45 had a small bump on his head. In another incident, Resident #45 entered Resident #53's room and attempted to take his belongings, resulting in Resident #53 hitting his hand on the dresser while trying to retrieve his items. This incident led to Resident #53 sustaining a fracture in his right hand, which was initially missed by the facility's x-ray but later confirmed by a hospital ER visit. Further observations and interviews revealed that Resident #45 continued to exhibit aggressive behavior and used his wheelchair as a weapon when agitated. Staff members, including an LPN and an STNA, confirmed that Resident #45 was difficult to manage and often became combative when redirected. Despite these ongoing issues, the facility did not update Resident #45's care plan to include specific interventions to prevent him from entering other residents' rooms and causing further incidents. This lack of appropriate care planning and intervention contributed to the physical and emotional distress experienced by other residents in the facility.
Latest citations in Ohio
Surveyors found that multiple hazardous storage areas, including a closet near medical records, a beauty salon used to store chemical cases, a supply room in one nursing station, a room leading to a smoking area, a housekeeping room near therapy, and a lobby storage room, lacked required self-closing or automatic-closing doors. These conditions did not comply with NFPA 101 requirements for hazardous area enclosure and had the potential to affect all residents and staff in an emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility did not conduct fire drills on every shift each quarter and did not vary drill conditions as required by NFPA 101. Record review showed that one shift lacked a documented drill for an entire quarter, and the pattern of drill times and dates did not demonstrate varied conditions. The Maintenance Director confirmed the incomplete and noncompliant fire drill schedule, which affected all residents and staff emergency preparedness.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain clear egress corridors as required by NFPA 101, with a TV/video cart plugged into a corridor outlet and multiple unsecured chairs placed in the hallway near resident rooms and the secured unit dining room, including directly in front of a fire extinguisher. These items projected about 29 inches into an approximately eight-foot-wide corridor and were located in front of the handrail, potentially affecting 28 residents and staff’s ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director confirmed these corridor obstructions during the survey.
A resident with intact cognition receiving Medicare Part A skilled services for metabolic encephalopathy had services discontinued while benefit days remained, but the facility did not issue the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN). The Social Services Director later confirmed that no SNF ABN was provided and reported she believed only a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was needed when all skilled services were stopped. This practice conflicted with the facility’s written policy, which required SNF ABNs to be issued when extended care items or services were initiated, reduced, or terminated due to expected non-coverage by Medicare.
Surveyors identified that the facility exceeded the acceptable medication error rate when two residents with type 2 DM received insulin doses that were not administered according to orders or manufacturer instructions. In two separate observations, an LPN administered Novolog and another LPN administered insulin glargine and insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens, and the insulin lispro and Novolog were given after the residents had already consumed a significant portion of their breakfast meals, despite orders for administration before meals. Manufacturer information for both insulin products required priming before each injection to ensure accurate dosing, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and specified time frames.
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete crash cart audits for multiple full-code residents. Surveyors, accompanied by the DON, found that daily crash cart checks did not include verification of supply expiration dates, and that an extension cord documented as present on several audit dates was not actually in the cart. Audit logs also conflicted with the cart’s contents by indicating that required items such as eye protection, saline, and clear plastic were present when they were not. These findings were inconsistent with the facility’s policy requiring the crash cart to be checked every 24 hours and after each use, with prompt replacement of equipment and supplies.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure on supplemental O2, COPD, and cognitive risk factors was repeatedly documented as non-compliant with the smoking policy, including going out to smoke outside designated times and retaining cigarettes and lighters provided by family. Despite prior assessments identifying this resident as unsafe to smoke without supervision, a later assessment classified the resident as safe to smoke independently without documented rationale or care plan update. The resident subsequently went outside alone with an O2 nasal cannula in place, lit a cigarette, and sustained facial burns when the cannula ignited, as observed by staff and confirmed by EMS and ED records. In a separate case, another cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls had a care-planned intervention for non-skid strips in front of a recliner, but observation and staff confirmation showed the strips were not present, despite remaining on the active fall-risk care plan.
Multiple dependent residents did not receive scheduled showers, bed baths, or shaving as outlined in their care plans and the facility’s routine care policy. One resident recovering from spinal surgery missed numerous scheduled showers over several months. Another resident who relied on staff for self-care repeatedly requested shaving but was not shaved, and visible facial hair was observed after a recent shower. A resident with chronic respiratory failure and a tracheostomy, requiring substantial/maximal assist with personal hygiene, had no documented showers for an extended period and was observed with long facial hair, which staff acknowledged should be removed during bathing or as needed. A cognitively impaired resident with ESRD and CHF, scheduled for twice-weekly showers, had multiple undocumented or missed showers and reported not getting showers despite asking aides who said they lacked time. Another cognitively intact resident with hemiplegia and multiple comorbidities, also scheduled for twice-weekly showers, had several dates where documentation showed no shower/bath/bed bath provided or no entry at all, and she reported feeling unclean and unimportant when her showers were missed.
A resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for urinary retention, and care plan interventions requiring the drainage bag to be properly secured with a dignity cover, was observed seated in a chair with the catheter drainage bag uncovered and containing visible dark yellow urine that could be seen from the hallway. Later, an LPN confirmed the catheter bag was lying directly on the floor without a dignity cover. This situation occurred despite facility policy requiring care to be provided in a manner that respects and enhances each resident’s dignity and personal privacy.
A cognitively intact resident with chronic orthopedic pain had a PRN oxycodone order, but multiple doses were signed out on the narcotic log by an RN without corresponding entries on the MAR or documented pain assessments. A CNA/med tech reported frequent problems with this RN’s narcotic counts and documentation, describing erratic behavior when handling narcotic keys. The resident reported taking oxycodone only once or twice daily and otherwise using Tylenol, which conflicted with the number of oxycodone doses signed out. The facility’s investigation found it was inconclusive whether narcotics were misappropriated or whether there was a failure of documentation, but confirmed there was no evidence that all signed-out doses were administered.
Failure to Maintain Self-Closing Doors for Multiple Hazardous Storage Areas
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to hazardous area protection and door requirements under NFPA 101, 2012 Edition. During facility tours, they observed that multiple hazardous storage areas did not have self-closing or automatic-closing doors as required for hazardous areas such as combustible storage and chemical storage. These areas included a closet next to medical records, a beauty salon being used to store cases of chemicals, a supply room in Station #2, and the room leading to the smoking area in Station #3. On a subsequent tour, surveyors observed additional hazardous areas without self-closing doors. The housekeeping room across from therapy and the lobby storage room were both noted to lack self-closing door mechanisms. The facility census at the time was 59 residents, and the surveyors stated that this deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff's ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director verified these findings at the time they were observed.
Plan Of Correction
K 0321 This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be admissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 06/12/2026 K-0321 Doors with Self-Closing Devices Corrective action for resident/s: 1. The closet door next to medical records was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing device to closet door next to medical records on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. The beauty salon had chemicals stored in it on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director moved chemicals from beauty salon on 05/20/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. The supply room on station 2 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing door to supply room on station 2 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The room to the smoking area on station 3 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the smoking are on station 3 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The housekeeping room across from therapy was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the housekeeping room across from therapy gym on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 5. The lobby storage room was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the lobby storage room on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: LNHA and Maintenance director/designee completed a full facility audit for doors with self-closing devices on 05/26/2026. Any corrective action, including, doors identified as needing self-closures will be added on or before 06/09/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 sections 19.3.2.1 and 19.3.5.9 specifically regarding doors with self-closing devices. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Doors with Self-Closing device audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 06/12/2026
Failure to Conduct Required Quarterly Fire Drills on All Shifts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct fire drills in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.7.1 through 19.7.1.8, specifically by not holding drills every shift each quarter and not varying drill conditions as required. Record review on 06/09/25 at approximately 10:32 A.M. showed there was no fire drill conducted for the first shift during the third quarter. The documented first-shift fire drills occurred on 01/30/26 at 2:42 P.M., 04/30/26 at 1:51 P.M., and 10/31/25 at 10:58 A.M., indicating a missed quarter. Second-shift fire drills were recorded on 02/26/26 at 5:20 P.M., 06/03/25 at 4:35 P.M., 08/29/25 at 3:46 P.M., and 11/25/25 at 5:09 P.M., and third-shift drills on 02/28/26 at 11:47 P.M., 05/30/25 at 12:18 A.M., 07/22/25 at 11:34 P.M., 09/26/25 at 11:40 P.M., and 12/15/25 at 5:17 A.M. The surveyor determined that drills were not conducted under varied conditions and that the required quarterly drill on each shift was not consistently performed. The Maintenance Director confirmed these findings at the time they were identified, and the deficiency had the potential to affect all 59 residents and staff response in an emergency. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were described in the report; the deficiency related to facility-wide emergency preparedness practices and documentation of fire drills.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0712 Fire Drills Corrective action for resident/s: There were no records of a fire drill for the first shift of the third quarter of 2025. First shift fire drill completed on 5/24/2026 by maintenance director/designee with no findings or corrective action necessary. Identification of other residents who may be affected: On 5/26/2026 Maintenance director/designee completed 100% audit of the scheduled fire drills to ensure a drill is scheduled quarterly each shift with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.7.1.4 through 19.7.1.7. specifically including fire drill frequency requirements. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Fire Drill Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Obstructed Egress Corridors Due to Equipment and Chairs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain required clear egress widths in corridors in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.2.3.4 through 19.2.3.5 and 7.3.2 through 7.3.2.3, creating projections into the egress corridor that exceeded allowable limits. Surveyors observed that on one day in Station #3, a cart with a television and video equipment was plugged into an outlet in the corridor by room 38, and five activity room chairs were placed in the corridor near the secured unit dining room directly in front of a fire extinguisher. On the following day, surveyors again observed chairs in the Station #3 corridor, with four by room 35 and four by the activities room, and the same television cart still in the corridor; the chairs were not secured. The corridor was approximately eight feet wide, and the projections extended approximately 29 inches into the corridor in front of the handrail. These conditions had the potential to affect 28 residents in the facility and the staff’s ability to assist in an emergency, and the Maintenance Director confirmed the observations at the time of discovery. No specific resident medical histories or conditions were described in the report, only that 28 residents were potentially affected and the facility census was 59.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be subsequent remedial measures and should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0232 Clear path of egress Corrective action for resident/s: 1. On 05/18/2026 station 3 had a cart with a television parked in the corridor by room 38 that exceeded allowable limits. Maintenance director/designee moved the TV cart into the activity room, out to the corridor on 05/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. On 5/18/2026 station 3 had 5 chairs in the corridor near the dining room directly in front of the fire extinguisher. Maintenance director/designee moved the chairs into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. On 5/19/2026 station 3 had 4 chairs by the activity room and 4 by room 35. In addition, the TV cart was in the corridor. The maintenance director/designee moved the chairs and TV cart into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/19/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Maintenance director/designee completed a 100% facility audit for clear paths of egress on 5/26/26 with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: Maintenance Director/designee educated staff on 5/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.2.3.4 and 19.2.3.5 specifically including maintaining a clear path of egress. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Path of Egress Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Failure to Issue Required SNF ABN When Discontinuing Medicare Part A Services
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when Medicare Part A services were discontinued for a resident who still had available benefit days. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy and had intact cognition per the Minimum Data Set assessment. The facility’s own SNF Beneficiary Notification Review documented that Medicare Part A skilled services began on 02/11/26 and the last covered day was 03/11/26, and that the facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A services before the resident’s benefit days were exhausted. Despite this, no SNF ABN was provided to the resident or the resident’s representative. During interviews, the Social Services Director stated that the SNF ABN was issued hours prior to the last covered day but, upon reviewing her files, confirmed that no SNF ABN had actually been issued for this resident. She further explained that she believed an SNF ABN was only required if one skilled service remained and that if all skilled services were being discontinued, only the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) needed to be issued. The Administrator, however, stated that a resident should always receive both a SNF ABN and a NOMNC when Medicare Part A services are discontinued and benefit days remain. Review of the facility’s written policy dated 03/28/23 showed that the facility was required to issue SNF ABNs for initiation, reduction, or termination of extended care items or services when Medicare payment was not expected, which did not occur in this case.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 F-0582 Corrective action for resident/s: On 5/14/26 Resident #34 was informed of rights and responsibilities related to Advanced Beneficiary Notice and voiced understanding of information for future reference by administrator. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Any resident receiving skilled services from nursing or therapy services. The Administrator audited all residents who were discharged from skilled services in the past 30 days to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice on 5/29/26. No non-compliance was noted. Measures for systemic change: On 5/14/2026 Business Office Manager, Director of Rehab, Minimum Data Set nurse, Director of Nursing and Social Services Director were educated on proper procedure of issuing of Notice Of Medicare Non Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice by administrator. All upcoming discharges from skilled services will be reviewed weekly at Utilization Review meeting to ensure notices will be delivered timely. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Administrator or designee to complete audits of all residents being discharged from skilled services to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 5/29/26
Insulin Administration Errors and Failure to Prime Insulin Pens
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with surveyors identifying 3 errors out of 28 medication administration opportunities, resulting in a 10.71% error rate. For one resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate cognitive impairment, the physician’s order directed Novolog insulin 10 units via subcutaneous pen-injector to be given before meals. During an observed medication pass, the LPN administered 10 units of Novolog insulin without priming the pen and did so after the resident had already consumed approximately 50% of the breakfast meal. The LPN later confirmed she did not prime the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer instructions for the Novolog FlexPen specified that an air shot (priming) must be performed before each injection to ensure proper dosing. Another resident, also diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and with intact cognition, had orders for insulin glargine 35 units subcutaneously twice daily and insulin lispro 20 units subcutaneously before meals, plus 12 units subcutaneously if blood glucose was between 251 mg/dL and 300 mg/dL. During an observed medication administration, an LPN administered 35 units of insulin glargine and 32 units of insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens and after the resident had consumed approximately 90% of the breakfast meal, despite orders for insulin lispro to be given before meals. The LPN later stated she could not remember if she had primed the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer information for insulin lispro stated that the pen must be primed before each injection to confirm insulin delivery and remove air, and that failure to prime could result in too much or too little insulin. The DON confirmed the expectation that insulin be administered as ordered, including priming each pen with two units before dialing the prescribed dose, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and required time frames.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 5/29/2026. F-0759 Corrective action for resident/s: Residents #21 and #22 were assessed and evaluated by nurse and Director of Nursing 5/14/26. Resident #21 and #22 both denied any adverse effects and none were noted upon assessment by the Director of Nursing on 5/14/2026. Notification made to physician on 5/14/2026. LPN # 2 competency Eval on insulin administration with the Director of Nursing completed 5/14/2026. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Diabetic residents on assignment of LPN #2/station 2 have the potential to be affected and were assessed by the DON/Designee on 5/14/26 and found to be within normal limits. Measures for systemic change: All Nurses were educated by the Director of Nursing on the steps for Insulin administration per competency, diabetes clinical protocol policy, Medication and treatment orders policy, administering medications policy, and Obtaining fingerstick Glucose Level policy On 5/14/2026. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing will complete insulin administration audits on 5 nurses. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance: 5/29/2026
Inaccurate Crash Cart Audits and Missing Emergency Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate and complete crash cart audits for residents requiring basic life support, affecting eighteen of thirty-five residents who were designated as full code. During an observation of the crash cart with the DON, surveyors found that the daily audit documentation for the month did not include verification of expiration dates for crash cart supplies. Review of the crash cart audit logs showed that an extension cord was documented as being in the cart on multiple dates, but the extension cord was not present in the cart at the time of inspection. Additionally, the audit documentation indicated that required items, including eye protection, saline, and clear plastic, were not present in the crash cart, yet they were documented as being in the cart. The facility’s undated “Emergency Crash Cart” policy stated that the crash cart is to be checked every 24 hours and after every use, and that equipment and supplies are to be noted and replaced promptly, but the observed documentation and contents of the cart did not match these requirements. This deficiency was verified with the DON at the time of the survey and was cited under the requirement that personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to residents requiring emergency care, subject to physician orders and advance directives, and was investigated under Complaint Number 2687380.
Plan Of Correction
Cridersville Care Center Provider Number:366171 Survey Type: Complaint Survey Survey Date: 04/29/26 This Plan of Correction (PoC) outlines the actions completed by the facility with regards to the deficiency citation. This Plan of correction does not constitute any admission of guilt or liability by the facility and is submitted only in response to the regulatory requirements. Please accept the following as the facility's credible allegation of compliance as of 4/30/26. F678 CPR All Full Code residents #18 have the potential to be affected by the alleged deficiency. On 4/27/26 the DON/ADON re-stocked the crash cart per the inventory sheet for all missing items. Crash cart inventory sheet updated and new one will go into effect on 5/1/26. All licensed nursing staff provided with training related to crash cart inventory being a daily audit review using inventory sheet on 4/27/26 per DON/designee. The DON/designee will conduct clinical rounds and conduct a random audit of crash cart three times per week for 4 (four) weeks to ensure compliance. The results of the audit will be documented. The facility conducted an Ad-Hoc QAPI meeting on 4/27/26 and discussed the alleged deficiency and corrective actions. Date when corrective action will be completed: 4/30/26
Unsafe Smoking Practices with Oxygen and Missed Fall-Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide a safe smoking environment, adequate supervision, and appropriate implementation of its smoking policy for a resident who used oxygen and smoked, as well as failure to implement fall-prevention interventions as care planned for another resident. One resident had multiple relevant diagnoses, including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, COPD, end-stage renal disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, diabetes, and necrotizing fasciitis. Her care plans identified impaired visual function, risk for respiratory complications related to a history of smoking, and risk for cognitive decline, with interventions including use of oxygen per order and observation for understanding. A smoking-related care plan created earlier documented that she wished to use smoking products, had been assessed as safe to smoke "with supervision," and was non-compliant with the smoking policy, with family continuing to provide smoking supplies despite education and a verbal warning for non-compliance. Smoking assessments and progress notes showed a pattern of non-compliance and inconsistent classification of this resident’s smoking safety. Multiple smoking observation/assessments completed earlier in March documented that she had no cognitive loss, visual deficits, or dexterity problems but was unsafe to smoke without supervision because she did not return smoking materials and did not follow designated smoke times. Progress notes described her going out to smoke multiple times by herself or with family, including sneaking out next door with a cigarette and going out multiple times in one evening, with staff documenting that she was "reeducated" and that family brought in cigarettes and lighters which she did not return to staff. Despite this history, a smoking assessment completed after a three-day hospital stay assessed her as safe to smoke without supervision, with no documentation explaining how this conclusion was reached or evidence that her care plan was updated accordingly. On the day of the incident, the resident reported she had cigarettes and a lighter on her person after returning from dialysis and stated she "could not find a nurse" and went outside to smoke, saying she "guessed" she forgot she had her oxygen on. A CNA observed her outside and saw a flame coming through the resident’s oxygen nasal cannula tubing, turned off the oxygen tank, removed the tubing, and patted out sparks on the resident’s shirt sleeve. The resident’s face and hands appeared black in color, and EMS documented first-degree burns to the head and face, with the resident stating she lit a cigarette with her nasal cannula on, causing the burn. The hospital record described her face as black from smoke and her lips and mouth as "burnt and charred," with a recommendation for intubation that she refused. The facility’s incident report recorded that she went outside with oxygen on to smoke without notifying staff, that staff witnessed the occurrence as she walked through the dining room door to the courtyard, and that she stated she thought she had turned her oxygen off. The facility’s smoking policy required interdisciplinary evaluation to determine safe versus unsafe smokers, staff maintenance of all smoking paraphernalia for both safe and unsafe smokers, and progressive consequences for policy violations. A separate deficiency involved another resident at risk for falls whose care plan included use of non-skid strips on the floor in front of her recliner as a fall-prevention intervention. This resident had severe cognitive impairment, used a walker and wheelchair, required supervision or touching assistance for transfers and ambulation, and had experienced two or more falls without injury since the prior assessment. The fall-risk care plan, initiated at admission, specified non-skid strips in front of the recliner beginning in November. However, nursing staff interviewed were not familiar with all of the resident’s fall-prevention interventions without checking the record, and observation of the room showed two recliners with no non-skid strips on the floor in front of them. An LPN confirmed that the non-skid strips were not present despite the intervention remaining active in the care plan, and moving the recliners did not reveal any strips. The facility’s fall management policy required identification of hazards and risk factors, implementation of interventions to minimize falls and injuries, and development and implementation of a care plan based on interdisciplinary evaluation, with interventions related to identified risk factors.
Plan Of Correction
Smoking: On 03/21/26 at 3:16 P.M. 911 response was activated for Resident #11 and Medical Director #601 was notified by Registered Nurse (RN) #322. On 03/21/26 at 3:18 P.M. on-call Nurse/Social Services #423 immediately notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) #304 of the incident involving Resident #11. On 03/21/26 at 3:22 P.M. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived onsite. At 3:30 P.M. Resident #11 was transported to the emergency room. On 03/21/26 at 3:30 P.M. RN #322 completed a smoking re-assessment of Resident #11 assessing the resident to be an unsafe smoker requiring supervision due to failure to remove oxygen prior to entering designated smoking area. On 03/21/26 from 3:38 P.M. through 7:57 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #337, #336, #335, #338; RN #334, and DON #304 re-assessed residents (who smoke). This included Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, and Resident #10 to determine smoking safety (via smoking assessment). Each resident was re-educated regarding the facility smoking policy and staff verified there were no smoking materials on their person. The residents' smoking materials would be maintained by facility staff and distributed per policy. On 03/21/26 at 4:30 P.M. DON #304 responded to facility and an Ad Hoc (not scheduled) Quality Assurance (QA) meeting was held via telephone with the Administrator, DON #304 and Medical Director #601 to review investigative findings and plan of action. A root cause analysis was completed and determined Resident #11 had smoking materials on her person (believed to be obtained from family without staff knowledge) and failed to remove her oxygen. The QA team discussed a corrective action plan. On 03/21/26 from 5:00 P.M through 03/22/26 at 3:00 P.M. 26 RNs, 13 LPNs, one medical technician (MT), 54 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) four activities staff, one central supply staff, 11 dietary staff, 12 housekeeping staff, three laundry staff, one medical records staff, two social designees, two maintenance staff, nine administrative staff, and 19 therapy staff (158 staff at the time of the incident) were provided education regarding the facility smoking policy by DON #304 and the Administrator. This was completed via 1:1, small group in-services or via phone. Newly hired staff would receive education during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy. On 03/21/26 at 5:00 P.M. DON #304 completed an audit of all residents who smoke (Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, and Resident #10) to verify smoking evaluations and plans of care accurately reflected the residents' smoking safety needs. The residents were educated on the facility smoking policy, and smoking materials were to be maintained at the nurses' station. An audit was completed which included verification of required safety measures present in designated smoking areas, including an ash can, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, ash trays and no oxygen signs. There were no identified concerns or changes made because of the audits. On 03/21/26 at 8:55 P.M. Resident #11 returned from the ED. LPN #332 verbally educated the resident regarding the facility smoking policy which included the need for supervision, a smoking apron (to be worn) and the facility smoke times. LPN #332 verified no smoking materials were on the resident's person or in her room at this time. On 03/23/26 at 11:00 A.M. the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) (Administrator, DON #304, Medical Director #601, RN #302, Social Services #427, Social Services #423, DON #300, and Maintenance #436) met in-person to review the plan of action with DON #304/designee to complete weekly monitoring of residents who smoke and designated smoking areas weekly for four weeks with Housekeeping responsible to complete the cleaning. Housekeeping staff were responsible for cleaning ashtrays and the designated smoking area daily. Audits to be reviewed and any further actions required to be directed by the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee during scheduled meetings. The IDT also reviewed all current smoking assessments and care plans for residents who smoke. Resident #50 required a change in supervision levels with smoking due to cognition levels and her plan of care as well as Resident #11's plan of care was updated to reflect supervision/safety. On 03/23/26 from 3:45 P.M. to 8:55 P.M. Social Services #423 re-educated residents who smoke (Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, Resident #10) and responsible parties, if applicable regarding the facility smoking policy and supervision levels. On 03/23/26 at12:13 P.M. Social Services #427 contacted Resident #11's family member (#602) to schedule a care conference. Family member #602 and Family Member #603 were not available to meet until 03/27/26. On 03/23/26 at 1:00 P.M. staff education related to smoking areas, removal of oxygen prior to entering smoking area and maintaining smoking materials at the nurses' station for residents who smoke was initiated by DON #304 and the Administrator via 1:1, small group in-services or via phone call. Education was completed for all 158 staff by 03/24/26 at 1:00 P.M. Newly hired staff would be educated during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy. The facility does not utilize agency staff. On 03/27/26 at 11:00 A.M. a care conference was held with Resident #11 and Family Members #602 and #603, the Administrator, Social Services #423 and Social Services #427. The facility smoking policy was reviewed. The resident and family were informed an involuntary discharge would be initiated should the resident exhibit non-compliance moving forward and supervision would be increased beyond the two-hour standard of care to monitor more closely for non-compliance with the facility smoking policy. Family Member #602 stated he educated his siblings as well. On 04/10/26 at 2:00 P.M. DON #304 initiated education with 26 RNs and 13 LPNs (100% of nurses educated) regarding completion of the smoking evaluation via 1:1, small group in-services, or phone. The education was completed by 6:00 P.M. on 04/10/26. A new resident who smokes must remain supervised until the interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviews and determines smoking safety, at which time the care plan is developed and resident and family education is provided. The communication through the staff would be the care plan. Newly hired staff receive education during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy and completion of smoking evaluation via Point Click Care (PCC). On 04/10/26 at 4:29 P.M. DON #304 initiated an order in PCC for the nurse to verify, each shift, that Resident #11's smoking materials were maintained at the nurses' station. On 04/13/26 at 5:30 P.M. DON #304 initiated orders in PCC for nurses to verify, each shift, that all residents who smoke would have smoking materials maintained at the nurses' station. An updated list of smokers included: Resident #60, Resident #50, Resident #11, Resident #86, Resident #113, and Resident #151. On 04/13/26 at 5:45 P.M. DON #304 initiated questionnaires for staff regarding the smoking policy with re-education provided as needed via 1:1 and small group in-services for staff currently in the facility with all staff to be questioned/educated prior to working their next scheduled shift. Falls: On 4/9/26, Maintenance Director placed non-skid strips on the floor in front of Resident #12's recliner. Like Residents are identified as residents who have had a fall within the facility. Utilizing the Fall Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, an audit of falls and appropriate interventions for the past 30 days will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure fall interventions are in place per plan of care. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or F 0689 before 5/13/26. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses and STNA/CNAs on the Fall Management Policy to include fall interventions to be in place per the care plan. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. Utilizing the Fall Management Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of new admissions, new readmissions and residents who experience a fall within the last 7 days, weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure fall safety interventions are in place per plan of care. Current fall interventions found to not be in place will be corrected with all intervention in place per plan of care. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Removal Plan
- Activated 911 response for Resident #11 and notified the Medical Director.
- On-call Nurse/Social Services immediately notified the Administrator and DON of the incident.
- EMS arrived onsite and Resident #11 was transported to the emergency room.
- Completed a smoking re-assessment of Resident #11, determining the resident was an unsafe smoker requiring supervision due to failure to remove oxygen prior to entering the designated smoking area.
- Re-assessed all residents who smoke (Residents #22, #3, #47, #50, #60, #150, #86, and #10) to determine smoking safety via smoking assessment.
- Re-educated residents who smoke regarding the facility smoking policy and verified there were no smoking materials on their person.
- Implemented that smoking materials would be maintained by facility staff and distributed per policy.
- Held an ad hoc QA meeting to review investigative findings and plan of action.
- Completed a root cause analysis determining Resident #11 had smoking materials on her person and failed to remove oxygen.
- Developed a corrective action plan.
- Provided facility-wide education to staff on the facility smoking policy.
- Implemented that newly hired staff would receive smoking policy education during orientation.
- Completed an audit of all residents who smoke to verify smoking evaluations and plans of care accurately reflected smoking safety needs.
- Ensured smoking materials were maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Audited designated smoking areas for required safety measures (ash can, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, ash trays, and no-oxygen signs).
- Provided verbal education to Resident #11 on smoking policy (supervision, smoking apron, smoke times).
- Verified no smoking materials were on Resident #11’s person or in her room.
- Conducted an in-person IDT meeting to implement weekly monitoring of residents who smoke and designated smoking areas weekly for four weeks.
- Assigned housekeeping to clean ashtrays and the designated smoking area daily.
- Directed audits to be reviewed by QAPI.
- Reviewed all current smoking assessments and care plans for residents who smoke.
- Updated Resident #50’s supervision level.
- Updated Resident #11’s plan of care to reflect supervision/safety.
- Re-educated residents who smoke and responsible parties (as applicable) regarding the facility smoking policy and supervision levels.
- Contacted Resident #11’s family to schedule a care conference.
- Initiated additional staff education regarding smoking areas, removal of oxygen prior to entering smoking area, and maintaining smoking materials at the nurses’ station.
- Held a care conference with Resident #11 and family to review smoking policy.
- Informed resident/family that involuntary discharge would be initiated for future non-compliance.
- Increased supervision beyond the two-hour standard of care to monitor more closely for non-compliance.
- Provided education to all nurses regarding completion of the smoking evaluation.
- Implemented that new residents who smoke must remain supervised until IDT review determines smoking safety and care plan/education are completed.
- Entered an order in PCC for nursing to verify each shift that Resident #11’s smoking materials were maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Entered orders in PCC for nursing to verify each shift that all residents who smoke have smoking materials maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Initiated staff questionnaires regarding the smoking policy with re-education as needed.
- Required all staff to be questioned/educated prior to working their next scheduled shift.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Shaving Assistance for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide scheduled and needed bathing and shaving assistance to multiple dependent residents in accordance with their care plans, preferences, and the facility’s routine care policy. One resident with spinal stenosis and recent L2–L5 decompression fixation fusion was care planned for substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bath and toileting hygiene and was scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Fridays. Electronic documentation from early January through early April showed this resident did not receive a shower or bed bath on 11 identified scheduled days, and the DON confirmed these missed bathing events. Another resident with dysphagia and developmental issues, who required assistance with self-care and mobility, reported that she asked staff to shave her but they did not, which bothered her. During an observation following a recent shower, she stated she had not been shaved and that the hair "itched"; small gray hairs were visible on her chin. A CNA confirmed the presence of gray chin hairs and acknowledged the resident needed shaving, stating it would be addressed with the next scheduled shower. A further resident with chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, heart failure, moderate intellectual disabilities, anxiety, depression, and PTSD required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene and had a care plan for assistance with self-care, including personal hygiene. Her shower schedule called for showers on Monday and Thursday nights, with complete shaves for men and women. Review of documentation showed her last recorded shower/bath was nearly a year earlier, with no indication of additional personal hygiene or facial hair removal on that date. Observations on two separate days showed long white hairs on her chin and jaw line, which a CNA later confirmed, stating facial hair removal should occur with baths/showers or as needed. A resident with end stage renal disease, respiratory failure, hyperlipidemia, and congestive heart failure, who had impaired cognition and required partial/moderate assistance with bathing and personal hygiene, was scheduled for showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Review of shower documentation from admission through early April revealed no showers provided or refusals documented on at least ten scheduled shower days. In interviews, this resident reported not receiving scheduled showers, was unsure of his shower days, and stated he could use a good scrub down, adding that he had asked aides who told him they did not have time. A CNA explained that shower days appear on shower sheets and in the computer and that CNAs are supposed to document daily, with nurses checking the documentation; the DON verified the resident had not received showers per schedule or preference. Another resident with a fracture of the lower end of the left humerus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis after cerebral infarction, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertensive heart disease, urinary retention, and osteoarthritis was care planned as non–weight bearing to the left upper extremity and requiring substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing. Her electronic record showed she was scheduled for showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. The shower task question "did the resident receive a shower/bath/bed bath?" was documented as "no" on three dates, indicating no shower/bath/bed bath was completed, and left unanswered on three additional dates. The DON confirmed that one missed shower was due to an outside appointment, that on two dates the "no" response meant no bathing of any type occurred, and that on three dates there was no documentation at all. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported that missing showers made her feel unimportant compared to others and that she did not feel clean when her shower was missed. Facility policy on routine resident care stated that showers, tub baths, and shampoos are to be scheduled according to person-centered care or state guidelines, with additional showers given upon request, but the documented and observed care did not reflect consistent provision of scheduled bathing and shaving for these residents.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #5 received a shower by the STNA on 4/13/26. Resident #8 received a shower by the STNA on 4/8/26. Resident #9 received a shower and had their chin shaved by the STNA on 4/14/26. Resident #70 received a shower by the STNA on 4/13/26. Resident #76 received a shower and had their chin shaved by the STNA on 4/15/26. 2. Like residents are identified as residents who need assistance with showering and shaving. Utilizing the Shower Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, an audit of like residents will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure that showers and resident shaving are completed. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses and STNA's on the Routine Resident Care Policy to include bathing and shaving residents. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Shower Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of 4-6 residents weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure that showers and resident shaving are completed. Noncompliance found during audits will be addressed and assistance with showers and/or shaving provided. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Uncovered Urinary Catheter Drainage Bag Compromises Resident Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident’s right to privacy and dignity related to management of an indwelling urinary catheter. A resident admitted with malignant neoplasm of the esophagus and type II diabetes mellitus had a care plan identifying risk for urinary tract infection and catheter-related trauma due to an indwelling catheter for urinary retention. The care plan interventions included ensuring the catheter tubing was secured and the drainage bag was properly secured with a dignity cover in place. Physician orders directed that the resident’s 16 French indwelling urinary catheter be changed every 30 days and as needed, and the comprehensive MDS documented that the resident had an indwelling catheter and was cognitively intact. During observation, the resident was seen seated in a chair with the urinary catheter drainage bag hanging from the chair without a dignity cover, and dark yellow urine was visible in the bag from the hallway. In a later observation and interview, an LPN confirmed that the catheter bag was lying directly on the floor and did not have a dignity cover. Attempts to interview the resident to confirm cognitive status were unsuccessful, as the resident was unable to answer screening questions. Review of the facility’s “Resident Dignity & Personal Privacy” policy stated that the facility should provide care in a manner that respects and enhances each resident’s dignity, individuality, and right to personal property, which was not followed in this instance when the catheter drainage bag was left uncovered and visible.
Plan Of Correction
The Laurels of Athens wishes to have this plan of correction submitted as our written allegation of compliance. Preparation and/or execution of this plan of correction does not constitute admission to nor agreement with, either the existence of, or the scope and severity of, any of the cited deficiencies or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. This plan is prepared and/or executed to ensure continuing compliance with regulatory requirements. Our alleged date of compliance is 5/13/2026. 1. On 4/6/26, Resident #92's catheter bag was removed from the floor, the bag changed and covered for dignity by the licensed nurse. Resident #92 discharged from the facility on 4/11/26. 2. Like Residents are identified as residents who utilize urinary catheters. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee for like residents utilizing the Urinary Catheter Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC to ensure catheter bags are covered for dignity and not laying directly on the floor. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses on the Indwelling Urinary Catheter Policy as well as Resident Dignity & Personal Privacy Policy to include privacy covers are in place for urinary catheters and that the catheter is not laying on the floor. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Urinary Catheter Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of all residents with catheters weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure catheter bags are covered for dignity and not laying directly on the floor. Any catheters found to be touching the floor or uncovered will be removed from the floor, the bag changed and covered for dignity. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Failure to Prevent Possible Misappropriation and Poor Documentation of PRN Narcotics
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failure to prevent potential misappropriation of a resident’s narcotic medication and failure to ensure accurate documentation of controlled substance administration. A cognitively intact resident with chronic pain related to an internal orthopedic device and left knee pain had an order for oxycodone 5 mg PO every four hours PRN for pain and a care plan directing staff to administer medications as ordered and observe for effectiveness and side effects. The resident’s MDS showed she rated her pain as 7/10 and received opioid medication. However, review of the February MAR and the narcotic log revealed multiple discrepancies between narcotic sign-outs and documented administration. On several occasions, oxycodone doses were signed out on the narcotic log by an RN without corresponding documentation on the MAR. Specifically, oxycodone was signed out on one evening at 9:30 p.m. with no MAR entry, and again on a subsequent night at 1:30 a.m. and 5:30 a.m. with no MAR entries for those times. Another dose was signed out at 9:00 p.m. while the MAR reflected administration at 10:16 p.m., and a later dose at 5:30 a.m. was documented on both the narcotic log and MAR. There was also no documentation of pain assessments before or after PRN opioid administration. These documentation gaps meant there was no evidence that all narcotic doses signed out were actually administered to the resident. Staff interviews further highlighted concerns about the handling of narcotics. A CNA/med tech reported frequently taking the narcotic keys from the RN and described the RN’s behavior as erratic, with repeated problems involving incorrect narcotic counts and missing documentation on both the MAR and narcotic log. The resident stated she did not receive oxycodone more than once or twice a day, preferring to take Tylenol the rest of the time, which conflicted with the number of oxycodone doses signed out. When questioned, the RN gave inconsistent explanations about how often she pulled and administered PRN narcotics and acknowledged struggling with the new system, while also suggesting the resident may have received PRN tizanidine instead of remembering oxycodone. The facility’s investigation concluded that evidence was inconclusive as to whether misappropriation occurred or whether the issue was solely lack of documentation, but confirmed there was no evidence the resident received all doses signed out on the narcotic log.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #99 had a Self-Reported Incident submitted and investigated via the EIDC on 3/2/26. The investigation was inconclusive as we could not prove that misappropriation occurred. On 2/24/26, Resident #99 was interviewed and pain assessed by Director of Nursing and resident had no ill effects related to the inconsistent documentation in the medical record as it relates to her controlled substance pain medication. 2. Like Residents are identified as residents who utilize controlled substance PRN pain medications. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee for like residents utilizing the Controlled Substance Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC to ensure PRN controlled substance pain medications that are signed off the control sheet are documented in the resident medical record as well. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses on the Controlled Substances Policy to include appropriate documentation of controlled substances. In addition, the licensed nurses will be re-educated by the Director of Nursing or designee on the Abuse Prohibition Policy to include misappropriation of resident property. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Controlled Substance Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit three controlled substance sheets from each of the nine medication carts for a total of twenty-seven sheets weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure PRN controlled substance pain medications that are signed off the control sheet are documented in the resident medical record as well. Inconsistencies noted from the audit will be investigated for misappropriation. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
