Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Grand River Health & Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident admitted with existing pressure sores and other comorbidities had an unstageable coccyx pressure ulcer documented as 2 cm by 2 cm with light serous exudate, but no specific wound care or dressing orders were initiated or documented for three days after admission. Wound care orders, including triad wound cream to the coccyx twice daily, were not started until several days later, by which time a wound NP documented the sacral wound as very large, measuring 11.5 cm by 11.2 cm with moderate serosanguinous exudate and involving the bilateral buttocks. The DON and Administrator confirmed that wound dressing orders were not initiated until three days after the resident’s admission.
The facility did not adhere to the planned menu, affecting most residents. A test tray and resident meals did not match the posted menu, with discrepancies confirmed by residents. The Food Service Director used existing stock before a company switch without notifying residents or updating the substitution list, which had not been maintained since the previous year. The Administrator and dietitian acknowledged the oversight.
A resident with impaired cognition alleged being groped by a staff member, but the facility failed to report the incident to the state agency within the required 24-hour period. Despite an internal inquiry and lack of evidence supporting the claim, the facility did not document further investigation or file a self-reported incident as mandated by policy.
Failure to Initiate Timely Wound Care for Existing Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to initiate timely wound care for a resident with a pressure sore, resulting in a period of three days without specific wound treatment orders after admission. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including cellulitis, prediabetes, and pressure sores, and a wound assessment documented on 09/05/25 identified an unstageable coccyx pressure ulcer measuring 2 cm by 2 cm with light serous exudate. Despite this documented pressure sore, no specific wound care orders were initiated or documented as completed until 09/08/25, when triad wound cream was ordered to be applied to the coccyx twice daily. The first wound nurse practitioner assessment on 09/09/25 documented the wound as significantly larger, measuring 11.5 cm by 11.2 cm with moderate serosanguinous exudate, and the wound NP recalled the sacral wound as very large and encompassing the bilateral buttocks, though she did not recall being informed of the initial smaller measurement and considered the possibility that the initial measurement was inaccurate. The DON and Administrator confirmed that no wound dressing orders were initiated for this resident until three days after admission, and this failure to promptly initiate wound care was cited as a deficiency under Complaint Number 2749003.
Failure to Follow Planned Menu and Update Substitution List
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow the planned and posted menu, affecting 73 out of 75 residents, as two residents received no food by mouth. On the observed date, a test tray contained beef stew over mashed potatoes, an eggroll, and jello, which did not match the menu that listed beef stirfry, rice, eggroll, and pineapple mousse. Interviews with two residents confirmed discrepancies between the menu and the meals served, with one resident noting frequent inconsistencies. The Food Service Director admitted to using up stock before a switch in food service companies and acknowledged not posting or notifying residents of menu changes. The substitution list was not updated, with only two entries for the entire year and the last entry from the previous year being in October. The Administrator and registered dietitian confirmed that menu replacements should have been posted and the substitution list kept current.
Failure to Report Alleged Abuse in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse involving a resident to the state survey agency within the required 24-hour timeframe. The incident involved a resident who had been admitted with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, elevated white blood cell count, and aphasia following a nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. The resident had impaired cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living. Despite the resident's daughter-in-law reporting the allegation to the facility's administration, the facility did not file a self-reported incident (SRI) with the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Gateway. The resident's daughter-in-law reported that the resident had claimed to have been groped by a large African American male staff member. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) conducted an internal inquiry, questioning the resident, who denied being touched inappropriately during the interview. The facility checked camera footage and staff schedules but found no evidence supporting the allegation. Despite these actions, the facility did not document any further investigation or witness statements, nor did they report the incident to the state agency as required by their policy. The facility's policy mandates immediate reporting of all allegations of abuse to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator and notification of local and state agencies. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the lack of a timely SRI filing. The deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation, highlighting the facility's non-compliance with state reporting requirements for suspected abuse.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 437 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Painesville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Healthcare Of Painesville | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Homestead Ii | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Concord Ridge Health And Rehabilitation | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Carecore At Mentor | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Concord Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Grand River Health & Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.