Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sunrise Manor Ctr For Nursing And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a history of stroke and seizure disorder was ordered Vimpat 50 mg PO BID, but an incorrect 200 mg BID dose was entered into a separate e-script system and filled by the pharmacy. The eMAR continued to show a 50 mg dose, yet four LPNs administered 200 mg tablets for four doses, as evidenced by missing tablets and narcotic count signatures, while documenting 50 mg on the MAR. The DON later explained that the EMR used for orders was not linked to the narcotic e-script system and there was no reconciliation process between the e-scripted narcotic order and the physician order in the chart, leading to the resident receiving a higher-than-ordered dose.
A cognitively impaired resident was observed performing oral sex on another resident in a LTC facility. Despite the impaired resident's inability to consent, the facility concluded the act was consensual. The incident was reported, and the resident was transferred for safety, but the care plan lacked preventive measures. The facility's response did not align with its abuse prevention policy.
A facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident from abuse, resulting in psychosocial harm. An LPN found a resident with impaired cognition performing oral sex on another resident with intact cognition. Despite the incident, the facility did not evaluate the resident's well-being or implement protective interventions. The Administrator concluded no abuse occurred, but the Psychiatrist emphasized the need for monitoring.
Failure to Administer Anti-Seizure Medication per Ordered Dose
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication errors when staff did not administer Vimpat (lacosamide) in accordance with physician orders and the facility’s medication administration policy. The resident, admitted with cerebellar stroke syndrome, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, and depression, had a hospital discharge order and subsequent physician order for Vimpat 50 mg by mouth twice daily. The facility’s policy required staff to verify a physician’s order, check the medication label against the MAR, and confirm the medication name and dose prior to administration. Despite this, an e-script order was entered for Vimpat 200 mg twice daily, which the pharmacy filled and delivered as 200 mg tablets. The electronic MAR, however, continued to reflect an active order for Vimpat 50 mg twice daily. Over several days, four LPNs administered Vimpat 200 mg by mouth for four doses while documenting administration of 50 mg on the MAR. The medication card for Vimpat 200 mg showed four missing tablets, and the narcotic count sheet documented four administrations of the 200 mg dose. The facility-reported incident and medication error report confirmed that the resident received 200 mg doses on multiple shifts while the MAR still listed a 50 mg dose. The DON stated that the physician had entered the incorrect 200 mg dose into a separate e-script system that is not linked to the electronic medical record for narcotics, and there was no process in place to reconcile the narcotic e-script order with the physician order in the resident’s chart. The physician confirmed the incorrect prescribing of Vimpat 200 mg instead of 50 mg, and the error was identified after four doses had been given.
Failure to Protect Resident from Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse, as evidenced by an incident involving two residents. One resident, with a diagnosis of dementia and severely impaired cognition, was observed by an LPN performing oral sex on another resident who was cognitively intact. The incident was reported to the Director of Nursing, and both residents were assessed. The cognitively impaired resident was transferred to a different unit for safety, and a psychiatric consult was ordered. However, the facility's comprehensive care plan for the cognitively impaired resident lacked documented interventions to prevent victimization, and the incident was concluded by the facility as consensual, with no abuse, neglect, or mistreatment determined. The facility's policy on abuse prohibition and prevention defines criminal sexual abuse as including situations where a resident lacks the ability to understand the nature of the sexual act. Despite this, the facility concluded that the incident was consensual, based on the cognitively impaired resident's smile and statement of having fun. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both believed the act was consensual, although the cognitively impaired resident's family member expressed distress and stated that the resident would have been upset and humiliated if they were cognitively intact. Interviews with staff and family members revealed that the cognitively impaired resident was known to wander around the unit but did not typically enter other residents' rooms. The psychiatrist involved stated that the incident should never have occurred and emphasized the need for monitoring the resident for any negative effects. The facility notified local law enforcement as a precaution, but the report indicates a failure to adequately address the potential for abuse and to implement preventive measures for the cognitively impaired resident.
Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident from Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure the highest practicable well-being of its residents, as evidenced by an incident involving two residents. Resident #1, a female with severely impaired cognition due to vascular dementia and depression, was found performing oral sex on Resident #2, a male with intact cognition, in Resident #2's room. The incident was witnessed by an LPN, who separated the residents and reported the event. Despite Resident #2 stating the act was consensual, the facility did not document any evaluation of Resident #1's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being or implement interventions to protect Resident #1 and other cognitively impaired residents from potential abuse. The facility's Administrator was aware of the incident but concluded that no abuse, neglect, or mistreatment occurred, as Resident #1 appeared to be enjoying the act. However, the facility failed to monitor and enhance the quality of care for Resident #1 after the incident or assess the potential for abuse among all cognitively impaired residents. The Psychiatrist involved stated that the incident should not have occurred and emphasized the need for staff to monitor Resident #1 for any negative effects. This deficiency resulted in actual psychosocial harm to Resident #1.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 222 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bay Shore
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Regina Rehabilitation And Nursing | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Ross Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Momentum At South Bay For Rehabilation And Nursing | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Our Lady Of Consolation Nursing And Rehabilitive C | 4.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 1 |
| Berkshire Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 6 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Sunrise Manor Ctr For Nursing And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.