Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Schulman And Schachne Inst For Nursing & Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with cognitive impairment was improperly restrained with bed sheets by a CNA to prevent them from smearing feces, which was not medically necessary. This action was for convenience and resulted in serious harm, classified as Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance. Multiple staff members observed the restraint but failed to report it, and the facility's investigation confirmed the abuse.
A resident with cognitive impairment was improperly restrained with bed sheets tied to bed rails by a CNA to prevent feces smearing, without medical justification. Despite facility policies requiring the least restrictive environment, the restraint was not authorized, and LPNs failed to act on reports from CNAs. The facility's investigation confirmed abuse, supported by photographic evidence from the resident's family.
A resident experienced a delay in receiving necessary care due to untimely x-ray results. An x-ray ordered to rule out a fracture was not performed promptly, and the results, indicating fractures, were not communicated to the facility in a timely manner. This led to the resident being transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. The facility's policy for timely reporting of test results was not followed, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with moderately impaired cognition was found restrained with bed sheets on multiple occasions. CNAs reported the incidents to LPNs, but the LPNs did not notify the RN Supervisor or Administrator as required. The facility's policy lacked clarity on reporting suspected abuse, leading to a deficiency citation.
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as observed during a survey. An open and undated package of frozen fish patties was found in the walk-in freezer, and the refrigerator had juice spills and expired ricotta cheese. Interviews revealed unclear responsibilities among staff for cleaning and food storage, contributing to these deficiencies.
The facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse, with an uncovered dumpster and scattered trash, including biohazard containers and various metal objects. Staff interviews revealed confusion over responsibility for maintaining cleanliness in the garbage area.
The facility failed to develop individualized discharge care plans for three residents, despite their expressed desires to be discharged or transferred. One resident with Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, and Diabetes wanted to move to an apartment, while another with Seizure Disorder, Hyperlipidemia, and Hypertension wished to return to the community. A third resident with Thyroid Disorder and Myotonic Dystrophy requested a transfer to another facility. The facility's policies require discharge planning to begin on admission, but these were not followed.
The facility failed to serve meals at appetizing temperatures, as observed during a survey. Two residents reported receiving cold meals, and test trays confirmed that several food items were below the optimal temperature. The Food Service Director noted that meal delivery took longer than expected, affecting food quality, and suggested that the delivery system might need maintenance.
A resident with a history of Cerebral Vascular Accident and Dementia did not receive necessary nail care, resulting in long, thick, and discolored fingernails. Facility staff were unaware of the resident's condition, and there was no documentation of nail care being provided. The facility's policy required regular nail care, but this was not followed, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with cognitive impairment and physical limitations fell during a transfer when a CNA used a mechanical lift without waiting for the required second staff member. The facility's policy mandated two-person assistance for such transfers, but the CNA proceeded alone, resulting in the resident sliding from the lift and sustaining a forehead laceration. The incident was deemed preventable if proper procedures had been followed.
A resident with Multiple Sclerosis and severely impaired cognition was not provided with a television or device to watch their preferred programs, despite it being documented as a significant leisure interest. Observations and interviews confirmed the lack of access to a television, and facility staff could not explain the failure to accommodate the resident's preferences.
A resident with limited ROM was not consistently wearing a prescribed left-hand carrot splint, intended to prevent further hand tightening. Despite orders for daily use, observations showed the resident without the splint, and staff interviews revealed the resident often refused to wear it. The care plan did not document these refusals, and the nursing supervisor was unaware of the non-compliance.
A resident's family member discovered healing abrasions on the resident's shins during a visit, which had not been communicated by the facility. The resident, who was non-verbal and severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for care. A CNA observed the skin changes but did not report them, leading to the family member raising concerns. The facility's skin check forms initially indicated good skin condition, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight.
Resident Restraint and Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity, specifically regarding the use of restraints. On several occasions, a resident's wrists were tied with bed sheets to the bed rails. A Certified Nursing Assistant admitted to using these restraints to prevent the resident from removing their brief and smearing feces, which was not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This action was determined to be for the purposes of discipline or convenience, resulting in serious harm to the resident and was classified as Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance. The resident involved had moderately impaired cognition and was at risk for victimization due to cognitive impairment. The facility's policy on physical restraints emphasized the least restrictive environment, and restraints were to be used only to protect residents' health and safety. However, there was no documented evidence that the use of hand protectors was renewed after a certain date, and the facility's investigation revealed that restraints were indeed used, and abuse occurred. Multiple staff members observed the resident being restrained but failed to report it immediately, and some staff members denied being informed about the restraint incidents. The facility's investigation included statements from various staff members and the resident's family, as well as photographic evidence provided by the family. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator were informed of the situation, and the facility's investigation concluded that the use of restraints was inappropriate and constituted abuse. The facility's policy and procedures were not followed, leading to the deficiency.
Resident Restrained Without Medical Justification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from the use of physical restraints, which were not required for medical treatment. This deficiency was identified during an abbreviated survey and complaint investigation. The investigation revealed that a resident, who had moderately impaired cognition and was at risk for victimization, was restrained with bed sheets tied to bed rails on multiple occasions. The restraints were applied by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to prevent the resident from removing their brief and smearing feces, which was not a medically justified reason for restraint. The facility's policy on physical restraints emphasized the use of the least restrictive environment and required that restraints be used only to protect residents' health and safety. However, the policy was not followed in this case. The resident had a physician's order for hand protectors to prevent pulling of a catheter, but there was no documented evidence that this order was renewed or that the use of bed sheets as restraints was authorized. Multiple CNAs observed the resident being restrained and reported it to Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), who failed to take appropriate action. The facility's investigation confirmed that abuse occurred, and the use of restraints resulted in serious harm to the resident. Photographic evidence provided by the resident's family corroborated the observations of the CNAs. Despite the presence of evidence and reports from staff, the LPNs involved denied being informed of the restraint incidents, and the CNA responsible for applying the restraints admitted to the Director of Nursing that they used bed sheets and mittens to restrain the resident. The facility's failure to adhere to its own policies and procedures, as well as the inaction of certain staff members, contributed to the deficiency.
Delayed X-ray Results Lead to Deficiency in Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely care and treatment for a resident who required an x-ray to rule out a fracture in the left forearm. The x-ray was ordered by a medical doctor on the night of 12/05/2024, but it was not performed until 12/07/2024. The results, which indicated fractures of the midshaft radius and ulna with mild displacement, were finalized on 12/08/2024 but were not communicated to the facility until 12/09/2024. This delay in obtaining and acting upon the x-ray results led to the resident being transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. The facility's policy required that final written reports be submitted within 48 hours, but this was not adhered to. Interviews revealed that the medical doctor did not order a STAT x-ray initially due to the resident not complaining of pain and the swelling being attributed to a possible medical condition. The Director of Nursing and the Medical Director noted that the facility did not receive timely communication from the radiology department, which stated that it was the facility's responsibility to follow up on outpatient results. This lack of timely follow-up and communication contributed to the deficiency in care provided to the resident.
Plan Of Correction
Plan of Correction: Approved January 21, 2025 F 684 483.25 Quality of Care § 483.25 Quality of care I. The Following actions were accomplished for the resident identified in the sample: Immediate action to correct the alleged deficient practice included MD, and family notification of resident #1 x-ray results. On 12/10/24 resident returned to facility with hard cast to the left arm in place. Full body assessment of the resident complete, no additional area of concern noted. Pain assessment completed, pain management implemented, continued monitoring for skin integrity and circulation. The resident was immediately placed on another unit in another pavilion of the facility. Resident #1 was also placed on 1:1 monitoring for safety and observation. Resident was seen by psychiatrist on 12/11/24, physician determined there was “no psychological impact.” Rehabilitation consultation was ordered. Physical and Occupational Therapy consultation was completed on 12/12/24. Resident #1 was seen by orthopedics in the ER with follow-up on 12/14/24. II. The following corrective actions will be implemented to identify other residents who may be affected by the same practice: All residents requiring x-rays have the potential to be affected by the alleged deficient practice. An audit was conducted to ensure all residents with pending x-ray results were obtained and reviewed timely by the physician and timely notification made to resident/family member. A full body assessment was completed on all residents on all floors on 12/12/24 to ensure no other residents have injury, which the facility was not aware of. No other residents were affected by the deficient practice in the facility. Social Services conducted an audit by interviewing alert residents to ascertain whether anyone had witnessed the abuse of other residents or if they have been victims of abuse themselves. No residents have verbalized that they have been abused or observed any abuse of other residents. Risk for Abuse is in place for all residents. The re-education of all staff commenced on 12/10/24 and is ongoing: The following training was provided: 1. Resident Rights 2. Abuse, Neglect & Mistreatment 3. Siderails Monitoring, Bed Entrapment & Restraint 4. Reportable Concerns 5. Pain Management 6. Managing Difficult Residents 7. Resident Safety Quality of Care education commenced on 1/10/25. The following system changes will be implemented to ensure continuing compliance with regulations: On 12/17/24 a medical staff meeting was held, and education was provided to physicians, that effective immediately any suspicion of a fracture or trauma related occurrence, even if low suspicion, order should be made to stat on priority. Physicians are to follow-up on image results in EPIC, if ordered with suspicion of fracture is made. Medical staff meeting was conducted on 1/15/25, physicians were provided with education on residents’ right to be free from physical restraints, reporting of alleged violations and review of the regulations regarding Quality of Care. Education was provided by the medical director and the director of nursing. QAPI Committee meeting was held on 1/10/2025 to review the findings of the compliant survey. Staff Education started on 1/10/25 and is ongoing. Education will be provided during education, annual during mandatory in-service education and as needed. Education will be provided by the staff educator/designee. Nurses were provided with education starting on 12/17/24 that any X-ray orders are to be communicated on the 24-hour report by unit nurse, nurse managers/supervisors. Once the radiology images have been completed, the staff nurse will call the radiology department to obtain results. If the result is not available at the end of the nurses tour it is endorsed to the oncoming shift until results are finalized. Nurses will also check the shared medical records system (EPIC) to obtain posted results. On 1/15/2024, Diagnostic Test Policy and Procedure were reviewed with no changes. The Provision of Radiology Services Policy was reviewed and revised to indicate physicians will check order status in EPIC. IV. The facility’s compliance will be monitored utilizing the following quality assurance system. The facility Director of Nursing and Medical Director Designee will conduct random audit to ensure compliance with the review of x-ray orders and imaging results weekly for 4 weeks then monthly for 3 months and quarterly thereafter. The action plan will be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee for further review and recommendations for three months. QAPI committee will make recommendations for ongoing monitoring. The Medical Director and Director of Nursing/Designee will be responsible for the implementation of this plan of correction.
Failure to Report Abuse Allegations Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment was reported immediately, or within two hours, to the administrator. This deficiency was evident in the case of one resident who was observed with their wrists tied to bed rails using bed sheets on multiple occasions. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) observed these restraints and reported them to Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), but the LPNs did not escalate the report to the Registered Nurse Supervisor or the Administrator as required by the facility's policy. The resident involved had a history of moderately impaired cognition and was admitted with various diagnoses. The facility's investigation revealed that restraints were indeed used, and abuse occurred. Photographic evidence provided by the resident's family corroborated the use of restraints on specific dates. Despite the CNAs reporting the incidents to the LPNs, the LPNs failed to take appropriate action, and the Administrator was not notified until much later, when the Director of Nursing was informed by the resident's family. The facility's policy on abuse, mistreatment, and neglect required immediate reporting of any changes in a resident's condition to a Nurse Manager or Supervisor, who would then verify the concerns and initiate a report. However, the policy did not specify who should be notified in cases of suspected abuse. This lack of clarity contributed to the failure to report the incidents in a timely manner, resulting in a deficiency citation for the facility.
Plan Of Correction
Plan of Correction: Approved January 19, 2025 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** F 609 Reporting of Alleged Violations 10 NYCRR 415.4(a)(2-7) 483.12(c)(1)(4) Reporting of Alleged Violations I. The Following actions were accomplished for the resident identified in the sample: Report was made to the State Agency on 12/10/2024. Resident #1 was immediately assessed by the registered nurse; resident was sent to Brookdale hospital on [DATE] for further evaluation and treatment. The NYSDOH State investigator who was assigned to the case was informed of the allegation of abuse. The New York State Attorney General’s Office was notified on 12/11/24 and the New York City Police Department was notified on 12/12/2024. Upon return from the ER on [DATE] to the facility, a full body assessment was completed for resident #1 with no additional concerns to be reported. Resident #1 was placed on 1:1 monitoring for safety monitoring. II. The following corrective actions will be implemented to identify other residents who may be affected by the same practice: A full body assessment was conducted on all residents to ensure no other resident has any injury of unknown origin which needs to be reported to the DOH. Facility held AD H(NAME) QAPI Committee meeting on 12/10/24; the areas of focus were reportable incident, resident’s rights, abuse, neglect and mistreatment, and on 12/12/24 another AD H(NAME) QAPI was held addressing resident’s safety. The Social Work interviewed alert and oriented residents to see if any resident has witnessed abuse or has ever been abused or witnessed abuse with no other resident being impacted by this practice. A risk for abuse audit was done to ensure no other resident was impacted by this deficient practice. No other residents were identified. III. The following system changes will be implemented to assure continuing compliance with regulations: Facility Director of Nursing, Administrator/Designee will audit resident [MEDICATION NAME] weekly for three months to ensure all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported timely to the DOH, adult protective service, and law enforcement in accordance with facility policy and procedure and regulatory agencies. IV. The facility’s compliance will be monitored utilizing the following quality assurance system: The Director of Nursing and the facility administrator will report results of the audit to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for further review and recommendations for three months. The QAPI committee will make recommendations for ongoing monitoring. The Director of Nursing, Administrator/Designee will be responsible for the implementation of this plan of correction.
Food Storage and Safety Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During the initial tour of the kitchen, surveyors observed an open and undated package of frozen fish patties in the walk-in freezer, indicating improper storage practices. Additionally, the walk-in refrigerator was found with juice spills, and food items on the shelf were past their best buy date, specifically ricotta cheese with expired dates. These observations highlight lapses in maintaining cleanliness and monitoring food expiration dates. Interviews with the facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding cleaning and food storage duties. The Food Service Director admitted that the staff had not cleaned up the red meat juices and was unaware of the open bag of fish patties. The Store Room Inventory staff mentioned that they are responsible for rotating products and checking expiration dates, while the garbage person is tasked with cleaning spills. The Lead Cook stated that kitchen staff should ensure food freshness and remove expired items, indicating a disconnect in task execution and accountability among the staff.
Improper Disposal of Garbage and Refuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage and refuse, as observed during a Recertification Survey. The blue trash compactor/dumpster was found uncovered, with various types of garbage, including a red-colored substance, a gray crutch, old food, and blue rubber gloves, scattered on the ground. Flies were noted in the area, and there was standing water. Additionally, ten red biohazard containers were found next to the dumpster, along with six empty beer cans, six empty glass beer bottles, cigarette butts, a suitcase, televisions, a printer, and a disc producer. An old oil drum and an opened bag of rock salt were also present. An open trash container for metal items contained bedside table trays, mechanical lifts, chairs, shopping carts, metal cabinets, open paint cans, aluminum pans, backboards, and biohazard boxes filled with needles. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity regarding responsibility for maintaining the cleanliness of the garbage area. The Housekeeping Supervisor was unsure of who was responsible, while the Director of Building Services indicated that responsibility was shared among the hospital, nursing home, and clinics, with the groundskeeping department tasked with cleaning the grounds. The Assistant Administrator stated that the Director of Building Services was responsible for the trash compactor area, while the groundskeeping staff handled other trash, such as metal items. A Building Services Employee confirmed their responsibility for keeping the compactor area clean and ensuring lids were closed and debris-free.
Failure in Discharge Planning for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the residents' discharge goals, as evidenced by the lack of individualized discharge care plans for three residents. Resident #136, diagnosed with Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, and Diabetes, had intact cognition and expressed a desire to be discharged to an apartment. However, there was no documented discharge care plan, and the social worker had not discussed discharge options with the resident. Similarly, Resident #44, with diagnoses of Seizure Disorder, Hyperlipidemia, and Hypertension, also had intact cognition and expressed interest in returning to the community, yet no discharge care plan was documented. Resident #291, diagnosed with Thyroid Disorder and Myotonic Dystrophy, had requested a transfer to another facility and provided a list of potential facilities. Despite this, there was no evidence that the transfer request was submitted or followed up on, and no discharge care plan was documented. Interviews with staff revealed that the social worker was aware of the requests but had not taken action, and the Director of Social Services confirmed the absence of discharge care plans for Residents #291 and #44. The facility's policies require that discharge planning begins on admission and is documented, but these procedures were not followed for the residents in question.
Deficiency in Serving Meals at Appetizing Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature during meal service, as observed during the Recertification and Complaint Survey. This deficiency was noted in two units where meals were served to residents. The facility's policies on Dining and Meal Service and Food and Nutrition Service, both dated November 2023, require that meals meet the nutritional needs of residents and are served at appropriate temperatures. However, observations and resident interviews revealed that meals were often served cold or unappetizing. Specifically, Resident #27 and Resident #261 reported that their meals were not hot enough and were often served late. During the survey, test trays were conducted to measure food temperatures, revealing that several food items were below the optimal temperature for hot foods, which should be above 135 degrees Fahrenheit. The Food Service Director acknowledged the inconsistency in food temperatures and attributed it to the prolonged time taken to deliver meals, which exceeded the expected 30 minutes. Additionally, the Food Service Director mentioned that the food delivery system, in use for many years, might require maintenance to ensure proper functioning. The Administrator was made aware of the issue and acknowledged the need to review and improve the current food delivery system.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary services for a resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living, specifically in maintaining grooming and personal hygiene. This deficiency was identified during a recertification and complaint survey. The resident, who had a history of Cerebral Vascular Accident and Dementia, was observed with long, thick, and discolored fingernails, indicating a lack of staff assistance in nail trimming. The facility's policy on activities of daily living required regular nail care, but there was no documentation of such care being provided to the resident from April to May 2024. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the resident's need for nail care. A Certified Nurse Assistant acknowledged the resident's need for total care and mentioned that the nails were too long and required a podiatrist's attention, but failed to report this to the nursing staff. Both a Licensed Practical Nurse and a Registered Nurse, who was the nursing supervisor, were unaware of the resident's condition. The facility's policy stated that Certified Nursing Assistants should cut nails unless it is beyond their training, in which case a podiatry consult should be arranged. However, this protocol was not followed, leading to the observed deficiency.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision During Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents, as evidenced by an incident involving a resident who sustained a fall. The resident, who had diagnoses of hypertension, hyperkalemia, and non-Alzheimer's dementia, was dependent on assistance for transfers due to impairments in both upper and lower extremities. The facility's policy required that at least two staff members assist with mechanical lift transfers, as documented in the resident's care plan. However, on the day of the incident, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) attempted to transfer the resident using a mechanical lift without waiting for additional assistance, resulting in the resident sliding from the canvas and sustaining a laceration to the forehead. The incident was documented in the nursing progress notes and an internal investigation report, which concluded that the accident could have been avoided if the staff had adhered to the care plan requiring two-person assistance for mechanical lift transfers. The CNA involved stated that they had called for help but proceeded with the transfer before assistance arrived. The resident, due to cognitive impairment, was unable to provide an account of the incident but later recalled the fall and subsequent hospital visit. The Director of Nursing Services acknowledged that the incident was preventable had the staff followed the established procedures.
Failure to Provide Preferred Activities for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, specifically for Resident #365, who was not provided with a television or other device to watch their preferred programs. Resident #365, diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, Arthralgia, and an Unspecified Fall, had severely impaired cognition and expressed that it was very important to engage in favorite activities, including watching television. Despite this, multiple observations from 06/26/2024 to 07/01/2024 showed Resident #365 without any ongoing activities or access to a television in their room, as documented in their Comprehensive Care Plan and recreation assessments. Interviews with Resident #365 and facility staff, including a Certified Nursing Assistant and the Recreation Therapy Specialist, confirmed the lack of access to a television for Resident #365. The Recreation Therapy Specialist and the Assistant Director of Recreational Therapy acknowledged the resident's preference for watching television in their room but could not explain why no follow-up or alternative arrangements were made to accommodate this preference. The facility's policy indicated that service provision should be based on individual resident assessments and preferences, yet this was not adhered to in the case of Resident #365.
Failure to Ensure Proper Use of Prescribed Splint for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This deficiency was identified during a recertification survey, where it was observed that a resident with a history of cerebral vascular accident, dementia, and hemiplegia was not consistently wearing a prescribed left-hand carrot splint. The splint was intended to prevent further hand tightening and was to be worn daily as tolerated, according to physician and occupational therapy orders. However, multiple observations noted the resident without the splint in place, despite the care plan indicating its necessity. Interviews with facility staff, including registered nurses and a certified nursing assistant, revealed that the resident often refused to wear the carrot splint and would remove it when placed. Despite these refusals, the care plan did not document any refusal by the resident to wear the splint. Additionally, the nursing supervisor was unaware that the resident had not been using the carrot splint as required. This lack of adherence to the prescribed treatment and failure to document the resident's refusal contributed to the deficiency noted by the surveyors.
Failure to Notify Family of Resident's Skin Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident's designated family member of changes in the resident's skin condition, which is a requirement under their policy for notifying family members of changes in a resident's condition. The deficiency was identified during an abbreviated survey when a family member visiting the resident noticed healing abrasions on the resident's shins, of which they had not been informed. The resident, who was non-verbal, legally blind, and severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Despite the presence of healing abrasions, the facility's skin check forms initially indicated good skin condition, and there was no documentation of skin changes in the nursing progress notes until the family member raised concerns. The incident occurred when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observed the skin changes during care but failed to report them to the assigned nurse. The family member noticed the abrasions and brought them to the attention of the nursing staff, prompting an assessment by the Unit Manager and Registered Nurse, who confirmed the presence of healing abrasions. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator acknowledged that it was unacceptable for the CNAs to have missed observing the wounds, and the family member expressed dissatisfaction with not being informed of the skin changes.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,308 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 15 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Brooklyn
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrium Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Rutland Nursing Home, Inc | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Four Seasons Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Brooklyn Center For Rehabilitation And Residential | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Dr Susan Smith Mckinney Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Schulman And Schachne Inst For Nursing & Rehab.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.