Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Premier Genesee Center For Nrsg And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia and wandering, exit-seeking behavior eloped from the unit shortly after admission. Video showed the resident at the unit’s glass doors without staff present, and staff later realized the resident was missing after the resident had been socializing in the common area. An LPN placed a wander alert device on the resident’s wrist, but no alarms activated; interviews showed the tags were kept deactivated in storage, were not tested weekly while stored, and the facility had no policy or logs for the system.
A resident with intellectual disabilities and anxiety was allowed to leave an LTC facility without proper authorization or transport, despite lacking decision-making capacity. The resident was later fitted with an electronic monitoring device without justification, restricting their movement. The facility failed to follow procedures for resident safety and care.
Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Wander Alert Device Failure
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and use of assistive devices to prevent accidents for a resident with documented cognitive impairment, exit-seeking, and wandering behaviors. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, and osteoarthritis, and the hospital discharge summary documented that the resident was alert and oriented to self only. The facility’s own evaluation identified the resident as physically able to move about independently, disoriented to place, restless or agitated, verbally expressing a desire to go home, and at high risk for elopement. The resident was admitted to the facility around 2:00 PM and was later observed on video footage walking to the unit’s double glass doors, looking out, turning around, and continuing to walk on the unit without staff present. A progress note documented that the resident was socializing in the common area and staff later realized the resident was no longer there at approximately 5:15 PM. Staff initiated a search, made an intercom announcement for assistance, and noted that the resident had made repeated statements such as needing to go and asking what time they were being picked up. A wander alert device was placed on the resident’s left wrist at 4:30 PM, but staff stated they were unaware the resident had exited the unit because no alarms were activated. Interviews revealed the device had been taken from storage, where tags were kept deactivated, and activated when removed for use. Staff also stated the tags in storage were not tested weekly, no logs were maintained for activation, deactivation, or functionality, and the facility did not have a policy related to the wander alert system or the manufacturer’s user manual. Police later responded to the missing resident, and the resident was found approximately 2.3 miles from the facility in an area with no sidewalks, no streetlights, and speed limits of 45 to 55 miles per hour.
Improper Resident Release and Monitoring Device Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choice. A resident with intellectual disabilities, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was allowed to leave the facility at 5:30 AM to walk to a nearby hospital without an approved leave of absence order. The resident, who was cognitively intact according to the Minimum Data Set, was experiencing anxiety and insomnia and requested to go to the hospital. Despite lacking complete medical decision-making capacity, the resident was permitted to leave without being transported by emergency medical services, and the facility could not provide a signed Release of Responsibility form. The nursing staff failed to follow proper procedures when the resident expressed a need for medical evaluation. The Licensed Practical Nurse on duty did not contact the Director of Nursing or the Assistant Director of Nursing for guidance and allowed the resident to leave the facility independently. The Director of Nursing and the Director of Social Work both stated that the resident should not have been allowed to leave the facility under these circumstances, especially given the resident's auditory hallucinations and lack of capacity to make health care decisions. Additionally, the facility improperly placed an electronic monitoring device on the resident's left lower extremity without adequate indications for its use. The resident was not assessed as an elopement risk, and the device was placed after the resident left the unit without notifying the nurse. The resident expressed feeling punished by the device, which restricted their movement within the facility. The Director of Nursing later removed the device, acknowledging that the resident was not at risk for wandering and should not have been subjected to such measures.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 41 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Batavia
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Grand Rehabilitation And Nursing At Batavia | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Western New York State Veterans Home | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Leroy Village Green Residential Health C F, Inc | 9.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Villages Of Orleans Health And Rehab Center | 16.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Orchard Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 17.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Premier Genesee Center For Nrsg And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.