Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Ideal Senior Living Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dysphagia, severely impaired cognition, and an order for supervision with meals was observed eating lunch alone in their room while meal tickets also indicated supervision. The care plan and care instructions did not include meal supervision, although an SLP recommended it. A CNA delivered the tray and left, and staff later stated that supervision meant watching the resident throughout the meal and that someone should have stayed with the resident in the room.
A resident with hip and leg fractures, dementia, and later a tibia fracture with a DTI had poor PO intake and repeated significant weight loss. Nutrition notes and care planning did not consistently reflect the resident’s changing weight status or nutritional needs, supplements were adjusted without documented reassessment when weight loss continued, and the MD/NP notes described weights as stable or improving despite ongoing loss.
Failure to Supervise a Resident with Dysphagia During Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for a resident with dysphagia. The resident had diagnoses including dysphagia, severely impaired cognition, and required set up assistance for eating. A physician order dated 06/08/2022 directed a regular diet with supervision with meals, cut meat into small pieces, encourage small bites, slow rate, and alteration of solids/liquids. The comprehensive care plan addressed impaired swallowing and included interventions such as small bites, slow rate, altered solids/liquids, regular textures, cut meat into small pieces, thin liquids, and upright positioning as tolerated, but it did not include supervision at meals. The undated care instructions also documented setup or clean-up assistance at meals and did not include supervision. A speech-language pathologist evaluation and plan of care on 08/06/2025 recommended supervision with meals, along with cutting meat into small pieces and encouraging small bites, slow rate, and alternation of solids/liquids. During observations, the resident was seen eating lunch alone in their room while meal tickets documented supervision with meals. On one occasion, a CNA entered the room briefly to ask if the resident needed anything and then left. On another occasion, the CNA delivered the lunch tray and exited, leaving the resident alone to eat; no staff were observed entering the room while the resident ate. During interviews, the CNA stated that if the meal ticket documented supervision with meals, someone had to keep an eye on the resident while they ate, and acknowledged they did not stay in the room and should have. The SLP stated they recommended supervision with meals and expected their recommendations to be followed. An LPN and a unit manager stated that supervision meant the resident should be watched during the entire meal and that if the resident ate in their room, staff should stay with them.
Failure to address significant weight loss and nutritional needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure acceptable nutritional status for one resident with hip fracture, leg fracture, dementia with mood disturbance, and later a tibia fracture with a deep tissue injury. The resident had poor intake on admission, required supervision and touch assistance with meals, and experienced significant weight loss over multiple months. The record showed repeated weight declines, including a loss of 6.7% in two weeks, 6.6% in one month, 6.9% in three months, 11.3% in four months, 13.4% in five months, and 14.4% in six months, with several weights documented without a corresponding reweight or with no documented follow-through after the weight loss was confirmed. The nutrition assessments did not consistently reflect the resident’s current weight status or changing nutritional needs. After the initial significant weight loss, the dietitian documented poor intake and reduced the Ensure Plus supplement from three times daily to twice daily, but there was no documented evidence of further reassessment of nutritional needs or additional interventions when weight loss continued. Later assessments documented meal intake percentages, supplements, and estimated calorie and protein needs, but the notes repeatedly stated that no changes were needed, that weights were stable, or that the resident exceeded needs, even when the resident continued to lose weight. The care plan also documented the resident as overweight and meeting needs, with no documented evidence that it addressed the significant weight loss. The medical provider did not address the resident’s weight loss in the record. Notes from the nurse practitioner and physician referenced reviewing nutrition notes and described the resident’s weights as stable or slowly improving, despite ongoing documented weight loss. Staff interviews showed that weights were monitored, reweights were requested for weight discrepancies, and concerns were sometimes discussed in meetings or communicated by email, but the dietitian stated they did not always follow up on reweights or reassess weight status after significant loss. The physician stated they were made aware of significant weight changes through dietitian updates, but did not acknowledge being notified of the resident’s weight loss in August 2025, December 2025, or January 2026.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 47 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Endicott
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolut Ctr For Nursing & Rehab Endicott L L C | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Vestal Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Good Shepherd Village At Endwell | 4.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Willow Point Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 4.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Susquehanna Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L L C | 5.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Ideal Senior Living Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.