Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Hudson Pointe At Riverdale Center For Nursing And during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with cognitive impairment and multiple comorbidities experienced an unwitnessed fall resulting in a left eye hematoma. The incident, which was documented by staff and led to a hospital transfer, was not reported to the Department of Health as required by policy and regulation, due to the absence of suspected abuse according to the DON and Administrator.
Two residents in an LTC facility did not have their bathing preferences honored, as they were not offered showers despite being scheduled for them. Documentation showed only bed baths were provided, and staff interviews revealed inconsistencies and a lack of communication about residents' needs. The facility failed to promote resident self-determination by not supporting their bathing choices.
The facility failed to accurately document the use of wander guards in the MDS 3.0 assessments for two residents with dementia and related conditions. Despite the presence of wander guards and their documentation in the MAR, the MDS assessments did not reflect this, as confirmed by the MDS Supervisor during a recertification survey.
A resident with Alzheimer's and a history of falls had their Falls Care Plan inadequately reviewed and updated in 2024, despite a fall occurring in late 2023. The facility's policy requires quarterly updates, but none were noted for the year. Staff interviews revealed confusion over responsibility for care plan updates.
Failure to Timely Report Injury of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or injuries of unknown source were reported to the New York State Department of Health within the required timeframe. Specifically, a resident with a history of coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and non-Alzheimer's dementia, who was moderately cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for most activities of daily living, experienced an unwitnessed fall from bed. The incident resulted in a hematoma and swelling around the left eye, and the resident was unable to explain how the fall occurred. The event was documented by both nursing and physician staff, and the resident was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. Despite the facility's policy requiring immediate reporting of such incidents, the event was not reported to the Department of Health. Interviews with the DON and the Administrator revealed that the incident was not reported because there was no suspicion of abuse and the resident was sent to the hospital. The facility's failure to report the unwitnessed fall with injury, as required by federal and state regulations and the facility's own policy, constituted the deficiency identified during the survey.
Failure to Honor Resident Bathing Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor and facilitate resident self-determination by not supporting the bathing preferences of two residents. Resident #88, who is cognitively intact and dependent on staff for ADLs, expressed a preference for showers but reported not having received one since admission. The facility's documentation showed that Resident #88 was scheduled for showers twice a week, but records indicated only bed baths were provided. Interviews with CNAs revealed inconsistencies in documentation and a lack of awareness about the resident's inability to sit in a standard shower chair, which was not communicated to the administration. Resident #46, also cognitively intact and dependent on staff for transfers and bathing, reported not being offered showers and only receiving bed baths. The care plan specified showers twice a week, but documentation showed only bed baths were recorded. Interviews with CNAs and the floor supervisor confirmed that there was no documentation of showers being offered or refused, indicating a failure to adhere to the resident's care plan and preferences. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of documentation and awareness regarding the residents' bathing preferences and needs. The facility's failure to document and provide the preferred bathing method for these residents highlights a deficiency in promoting and facilitating resident choice, as required by regulations.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Wander Guard Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents regarding the use of wander/elopement alarms. Specifically, the MDS assessments for these residents did not document the use of wander guards, despite evidence to the contrary. Resident #103, who was admitted with diagnoses including Dementia, Depression, and Psychotic Disorder, was observed with a wander guard device on the wrist, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented its observation every shift. Similarly, Resident #135, admitted with Dementia, Anxiety, and Depression, also had a wander guard device documented in the MAR, yet the MDS assessment failed to reflect this. The MDS Supervisor acknowledged that the assessments should not solely rely on medical records and that physical assessments and staff interviews are necessary. The supervisor admitted that a recent review revealed the oversight in coding these two residents accurately. The deficiency was identified during a recertification survey, highlighting the discrepancy between the documented MDS assessments and the actual use of wander guards for these residents.
Failure to Update Falls Care Plan for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan for falls was reviewed and revised in a timely manner. Specifically, the care plan for a resident with a history of falls and injuries was not updated in 2024, despite the resident experiencing a fall in November 2023. The facility's policy requires care plans to be reviewed and updated quarterly, but the resident's Falls Care Plan had no reviews noted for the year 2024. This deficiency was identified during a recertification survey, where it was found that the interdisciplinary team did not adhere to the facility's policy of quarterly reviews in conjunction with the Minimum Data Set assessments. The resident involved had multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer's Disease, Depression, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Diabetes, and was noted to have severely impaired cognition and a tendency to wander. After a fall in November 2023, the resident was found on the floor with a minor injury, and although the care plan was updated at that time, no further updates were made in 2024. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding the updating of care plans, with the Nurse Manager unable to explain the oversight. The resident had been recently hospitalized and returned to the facility, where they were no longer ambulatory and under constant supervision.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,612 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 20 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bronx
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Riverdale Rehab And Nursing | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Schervier Nursing Care Center | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Independence Care Center For Nursing And Rehabilit | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Prestige Nursing Care & Rehab Center | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Manhattanville Health Care Center | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Hudson Pointe At Riverdale Center For Nursing And.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.