Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Glen Arden Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to prevent and treat a heel pressure ulcer: A resident admitted after a hip fracture with dementia and high Braden risk developed a left heel blister that progressed from a Stage 2 to a Stage 4 PU. The chart lacked documented turning and positioning, heel offloading, and protein supplementation, and the CNA care sheet did not include those interventions. The wound care MD repeatedly recommended offloading, heel floating, side-to-side turning, and nutritional shakes, but those recommendations were not consistently reflected in the orders or documentation.
Food was found improperly stored and prepared, with unlabeled and undated items in the fridge and freezer, expired milk, juice, cereal, and coleslaw in storage areas, and staff observed in the kitchen without required hair restraints; a cook also lacked a beard guard while preparing to work with raw chicken. The Corporate Food Service Director stated some staff were independent living restaurant wait staff and that the former FSD had been responsible for labeling, dating, discarding expired food, and monitoring hair and beard restraints.
A resident at a dining table was left waiting while a tablemate was served and assisted with eating first. When the resident was finally served, an RN stood over the resident while providing feeding assistance. The FSD and DON stated residents at the same table should be served together, and the DON stated staff should not stand while assisting residents with meals.
Failure to Develop a Tube Feeding Care Plan: A resident with Parkinson’s disease and dysphagia was ordered NPO with Jevity 1.2 tube feeding at 70 cc/hr, but the chart lacked a comprehensive care plan with measurable goals and interventions for tube feeding and NPO status. The resident was observed receiving tube feeding, an RN administered water and crushed meds via the tube, and the RD and DON confirmed no tube feeding care plan was available.
A resident with a heel pressure ulcer did not have documented MD orders matching repeated wound care recommendations for heel offloading, turning and positioning, and nutritional shakes. The wound progressed from a Stage 2 ulcer to an unstageable wound and then a Stage 4 ulcer after debridement, while the primary physician stated they reviewed the wound consults and believed nursing staff had entered the related orders.
A CNA did not have a documented annual performance review on file within the past year. The RN Unit Manager, who was responsible for completing annual reviews for nurses, nurse supervisors, and CNAs, confirmed the CNA had worked at the facility since 2018 and that no signed review was available after checking with HR.
Two residents in an LTC facility experienced multiple falls and injuries due to inadequate supervision and failure to implement recommended monitoring and toileting schedules. Despite being care planned for specific interventions, there was no documented evidence of their implementation. Observations showed residents frequently left unattended, with call bells out of reach, and staff interviews revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding care needs.
The facility did not ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents in Units 1 and 2. Observations included stained and uneven carpeting, a ceiling leak, and broken furniture. The Director of Environmental Services noted the ceiling leak was due to a recent rainstorm, and the Administrator cited delays in renovations due to ownership negotiations.
The facility's new Medical Director, hired without prior nursing home experience, was unaware of their responsibilities, leading to a deficiency in resident care policy implementation and medical care coordination. The Medical Director did not assess residents promptly, was not part of the Quality Assurance Committee, and lacked communication with the former Medical Director, resulting in inadequate continuity of care.
The facility was found to have several environmental deficiencies, including ice accumulation on the kitchen freezer floor, stained ceiling tiles in the staff lounge and housekeeping closet, and improper storage of supplies in the ancillary services room. These issues were attributed to condensation, delayed repairs due to ownership negotiations, and inadequate reporting by staff.
Two residents were not served lunch at the same time as their tablemates, leading to a lack of dignity in meal service. The inconsistency was due to agency staff unfamiliar with seating arrangements, despite the facility's policy on open-style dining.
A facility failed to create and implement a person-centered care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, incontinence, and rheumatoid arthritis. The resident struggled with communication and mobility, and there were no documented care plans addressing these issues. The DON admitted to challenges in keeping up with care plan development.
A resident experienced multiple falls, but the facility failed to update the care plan with new interventions as required by their policy. Despite recommendations for increased monitoring and assistive devices, these were not documented in the care plan. The DON acknowledged the oversight, stating staff were informed of necessary interventions.
Two residents in an LTC facility did not receive timely care and treatment, leading to deficiencies in their quality of care. A resident with a fracture did not receive a CAM boot or physical therapy promptly due to a lack of clear ordering procedures, while another resident with end-stage renal disease experienced severe itching and skin excoriations without proper medical intervention. Staff interviews revealed communication gaps and inadequate responses to the residents' needs.
During a survey, expired medical equipment was found in the medication storage room, including needles and Medtronic quick sets. The facility's policy requires the removal of outdated items, but the Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight and took responsibility for discarding the expired items.
A facility failed to maintain safe food temperatures, with shrimp salad, baked chicken, and apricots found in the danger zone during a survey. A resident reported consistently cold food, and observations confirmed inadequate temperatures. The Food Service Director admitted the steam table was not keeping food at required temperatures.
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for two residents with indwelling medical devices, leading to a deficiency in infection control. One resident with a nephrostomy tube and another with a urostomy tube did not have the required precautions in place, such as PPE and signage. Staff were unaware of the need for these precautions, and observations confirmed the absence of necessary infection control measures.
The facility failed to transmit completed MDS assessments to CMS within the required timeframe for two residents. The assessments were rejected and not resubmitted for over 120 days. The RN MDS Specialist acknowledged not running reports to ensure acceptance by CMS, leading to the oversight.
Failure to Prevent and Treat a Heel Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate pressure ulcer prevention and wound care for one resident who was admitted after a hip fracture with surgical intervention, osteoporosis, and non-Alzheimer’s dementia. On admission, the resident was assessed as at risk for pressure ulcers, had impaired cognition, required substantial to maximal assistance with rolling in bed, and had no pressure ulcers present. The admission care plan identified interventions such as keeping heels elevated in bed and turning and positioning every two hours, but the Resident Care Sheet provided to direct care staff did not include documented instructions for turning, positioning, or heel offloading. After admission, the resident developed a left heel blister that was later documented as an open wound with drainage. The wound was identified as a Stage 2 pressure ulcer and then progressed to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer with full thickness skin and tissue loss. The record review showed no documented evidence that turning and positioning, heel offloading, or protein supplements were implemented when the wound first appeared. The November treatment record and CNA documentation worksheet also lacked evidence that these interventions were carried out. The wound care physician made repeated recommendations for offloading, floating the heels in bed, turning side to side, and nutritional shakes three times daily, but the record did not show that these recommendations were implemented as ordered or consistently documented. The primary physician orders included wound dressings and Darco shoes, but did not include the nutritional shakes or other wound care physician recommendations at the time they were first made. Interviews with the DON, RN unit manager, RD, CNA, wound care physician, and RN supervisor confirmed that the resident’s heel offloading, turning and positioning, and nutritional recommendations were not documented on the Resident Care Sheet or otherwise consistently carried out, and the wound care physician stated the wound deterioration was likely due to pressure and lack of nutritional supplementation.
Food Storage and Staff Hygiene Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Food was not stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During observation of the kitchen, surveyors found unsealed, unlabeled, and undated foods in the refrigerators and freezer, including fruit salad, sliced cucumbers, crumbled bacon, plated tossed salads, salad dressings, tomato juice, cheese, whipped topping, macaroni and cheese, sliced turkey, French fries, and green beans. The reach-in refrigerator and walk-in cooler also contained expired items, including almond milk, chocolate milk, individual cartons of milk, cranberry juice, and coleslaw, and the emergency food supply pantry contained expired Corn Flakes and Scooter cereal. Staff were also observed not following personal hygiene requirements in the kitchen. Employees were seen walking through the kitchen without hair restraints, and a cook without a beard guard was preparing to work with raw chicken. During interview, the Corporate Food Service Director stated that staff without hair nets were independent living restaurant wait staff and were not required to wear hairnets because they were not preparing food. The Corporate Food Service Director also stated the former Food Service Director was responsible for ensuring food was labeled and dated, expired food was discarded, and hair and beard restraints were monitored, and that the Corporate Food Service Director had become the acting Food Service Director that day after the former director left without notice.
Failure to Preserve Dignity During Dining Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that Resident #32 was treated in a manner that maintained dignity and respect during dining. During an observation in the dining room, Resident #23 at the same table was served and began eating with assistance while Resident #32 was still waiting to be served. Resident #32 did not receive their dinner until several minutes later. After the meal was served, Registered Nurse #18 provided feeding assistance to Resident #32 while standing over the resident. During interview, the nurse stated they had not received specific orientation about dining or feeding assistance and explained they stood while assisting residents because it was easier to observe the resident and check for food dropping. The Food Service Director and the DON both stated that residents at the same table should be served together, and the DON stated staff should not stand while assisting residents with eating.
Failure to Develop a Tube Feeding Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet Resident #20’s medical, nursing, and nutrition needs. Resident #20 had diagnoses including Parkinson’s disease and dysphagia, and the record showed a 04/16/2024 care plan for altered nutrition/hydration that addressed eating by mouth, including documenting food intake, using open containers, providing special utensils, allowing adequate time to eat, and feeding remaining food items at meals. However, the 11/29/2025 physician order changed the resident to nothing by mouth with tube feeding of Jevity 1.2 at 70 cc per hour for 20 hours, and there was no documented evidence of a care plan addressing tube feeding or the resident’s NPO status. The 12/05/2025 Significant Change MDS documented that Resident #20 was cognitively intact, dependent with eating, and received 51% or more of calories from the feeding tube. During observations on 12/16/2025 and 12/17/2025, the resident was seen in bed with tube feeding running at 70 cc. On 12/18/2025, an RN administered a 300 cc water bolus and two crushed tablets through the feeding tube and stated the resident was ordered NPO and that water and tablets were given via the tube. The RD stated the resident received all nutrition from the tube feeding and could not produce a care plan addressing tube feeding and NPO status, and the DON stated there should have been a tube feeding care plan including the formula, rate, and NPO status.
Failure to Ensure Physician Orders Matched Wound Care Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
Medical supervision was not ensured for one resident who was admitted with diagnoses including status post left hip fracture with surgical intervention, osteoporosis, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The resident was identified on admission as being at risk for pressure ulcers, and the admission assessment, Braden Scale, and MDS all documented pressure ulcer risk with no pressure ulcers present on admission. On 11/23/2025, the resident's left heel blister was documented as open with a large amount of serous drainage, a beefy wound bed with a darkened center, and the physician was notified with treatment ordered and applied. The wound care physician evaluated the resident on 11/25/2025, 12/02/2025, and 12/09/2025 and documented a left heel Stage 2 pressure ulcer that later became unstageable and then a Stage 4 pressure ulcer after surgical debridement. Each wound evaluation included recommendations for offloading the wound, floating the heels in bed, turning and positioning side to side in bed, and nutritional shakes three times daily with meals, but there was no documented evidence in the physician's orders addressing those recommendations during those visits. The primary physician stated they reviewed and signed the wound consults and believed nursing staff had entered the related orders, but the record did not show orders for heel offloading, turning and positioning, or nutritional shakes until later.
Missing Annual Performance Review for CNA
Penalty
Summary
Certified nurse aide #5 did not have a documented annual performance review completed within the last 12 months. The report states that one of four certified nurse aides lacked a signed performance review on file for the prior year. During an interview, the Registered Nurse Unit Manager said they were responsible for completing annual reviews for staff nurses, nurse supervisors, and certified nurse aides, and confirmed that certified nurse aide #5 had worked at the facility since 09/24/2018 but did not have a signed performance review from the last 12 months. In a follow-up interview, the Registered Nurse Unit Manager stated they contacted Human Resources and determined there was no performance review on file for certified nurse aide #5 from the last 12 months.
Inadequate Supervision and Monitoring Leads to Resident Falls and Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective monitoring programs to prevent falls and injuries for two residents. Resident #10, who had severe cognitive impairment and was at high risk for falls, was not placed on a 30-minute monitoring schedule or a toileting schedule as per their care plan after experiencing multiple falls. Despite being care planned for these interventions, there was no documented evidence that they were implemented. Observations revealed that Resident #10 frequently attempted to get out of bed unassisted, with the call bell often out of reach, indicating a lack of supervision and adherence to the care plan. Resident #12 experienced multiple falls resulting in serious injuries, including fractured ribs, due to inadequate monitoring and failure to implement recommended interventions. Despite recommendations for 2-hour, 1-hour, and 15-minute monitoring, as well as a toileting schedule, there was no documented evidence that these were put in place. Observations and interviews with staff indicated that Resident #12 was often left unattended in situations where supervision was necessary, such as in the bathroom, and the care plan was not updated with necessary interventions. Interviews with facility staff, including CNAs, RNs, and the DON, revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the residents' care needs and monitoring schedules. Staff were often unaware of the residents' fall histories and the specific interventions required to prevent further incidents. The facility's failure to implement and document necessary interventions and monitoring contributed to the residents' repeated falls and injuries, demonstrating a significant deficiency in the facility's fall prevention and supervision protocols.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents in Units 1 and 2, as observed during a recertification survey. In Unit 1, surveyors noted large brown stains and rippled, buckling areas in the hallway carpeting, a water leak from the ceiling near the dayroom, and stained ceiling tiles in the dayroom. In Unit 2, the nourishment area contained a broken metal office desk with missing and taped drawers, and a bathroom had holes in the wall. Additionally, the unit bathroom near a resident's room had a large black stain and cracked linoleum flooring, while the carpeting throughout the unit was stained, frayed, and uneven. The Director of Environmental Services acknowledged the ceiling leak in Unit 1 was due to a recent rainstorm and stated that a roof repair company had been hired. The carpeting, installed in 1995, contributed to the stains and buckling. The Administrator mentioned that ongoing negotiations for a new owner had delayed renovations and repairs, including carpet replacement and bathroom floor renovations. The Administrator was unaware of the broken desk in the nourishment area and stated that maintenance requests were logged and checked daily by the Environmental Services Director. Environmental rounds were conducted by the Administrator to communicate concerns.
Deficiency in Medical Director's Role and Responsibilities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the newly hired Medical Director was aware of and fulfilled their responsibilities, leading to a deficiency in the implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care. The Medical Director, hired on 8/1/2024, was not familiar with their duties, had no prior experience in a nursing home setting, and did not assess residents until 12 days after their hire date. They were not part of the Quality Assurance Committee, did not document their notes in medical records, and were unaware of the regulations related to their role as outlined in the State Operations Manual. Interviews revealed that the Medical Director did not confer with the former Medical Director and was not introduced to the staff or residents. The facility lacked a Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant, leaving the Medical Director as the sole physician. The Administrator, hired on 8/19/2024, was unfamiliar with the Medical Director and had not introduced them to residents or family members. The Assistant Administrator admitted to not confirming communication between the former and new Medical Directors, contributing to the lack of continuity in resident care.
Environmental Deficiencies in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, as observed during a recertification survey. Specific deficiencies were noted in several areas of the facility, including the kitchen, staff lounge, housekeeping closet, and ancillary services room. In the kitchen, a sheet of ice approximately a half-inch thick was observed covering the freezer floor, attributed to condensation from the freezer door opening and the lack of a drain. The staff lounge and housekeeping closet had stained ceiling tiles, and the ancillary services room had various supplies stored directly on the floor, including gauze sponges, Hoyer lifter pads, Sani-cloths, and razors. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the issues were known but not adequately addressed. The Director of Environmental Services acknowledged the need to replace stained ceiling tiles and ensure proper storage of items in the ancillary services room. The Food Service Director explained that the ice accumulation in the freezer was due to condensation and that a new dietary worker was being trained to manage this issue. However, dietary staff had not reported concerns about the icy freezer floor. The Administrator noted that ongoing negotiations for a change in facility ownership had delayed renovations and repairs, including addressing a sporadic ceiling leak on Unit 1. The Maintenance Department maintained a logbook for repair requests, which was checked daily by the Environmental Services Director.
Failure to Serve Meals Simultaneously to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity during meal service, as observed during the recertification survey. Specifically, two residents were not served lunch at the same time as their tablemates, which led to them watching others eat while they waited for their meals. On two separate occasions, one resident was served their lunch tray nine minutes after their tablemate, and another resident was served eight minutes after their tablemates had begun eating. This delay in service was not in accordance with the facility's policy on open-style dining, which states that residents should be served their meals according to the dining program. The inconsistency in meal service was attributed to the use of agency or temporary nursing staff who were unfamiliar with the residents and their seating arrangements. The Food Service Director and the Director of Nursing indicated that the nursing staff were responsible for seating residents and arranging meal tickets according to a seating chart. However, the Director of Nursing was unaware of the inconsistencies in meal service and noted that some residents' physical therapy sessions affected their arrival time to the dining room. Despite these challenges, the nursing staff were expected to direct dietary staff to ensure simultaneous service for residents and their tablemates.
Deficiency in Developing and Implementing Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and time frames for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, bladder and bowel incontinence, and rheumatoid arthritis. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia, was observed to have highly impaired hearing, did not use a hearing aid, and had difficulty understanding communication. Additionally, the resident was occasionally incontinent and had noticeable joint stiffness in the hands, yet there were no documented care plans addressing these issues prior to the survey. During interviews, it was revealed that the resident's hearing aids were not functioning due to their age, and the family did not wish to pursue an offsite audiology visit. The resident's son mentioned that staff made efforts to communicate effectively, but the resident still faced challenges. The Director of Nursing acknowledged responsibility for ensuring care plans were developed and effective but admitted to not always being able to keep up. This lack of comprehensive care planning led to deficiencies in addressing the resident's communication, incontinence, and mobility needs.
Failure to Revise Care Plan After Multiple Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident who experienced multiple falls, as required by their own Accident Incident Policy. The resident, who had intact cognition but required extensive assistance for various activities, experienced seven falls over a period from September 2023 to May 2024. Despite recommendations from accident reports and rehabilitation assessments, the care plan was not updated to include new interventions such as increased monitoring and the use of floor mats. The facility's policy mandates that care plans be revised to reflect new interventions following incidents, but this was not adhered to in the case of this resident. The resident's care plan initially included interventions like ensuring the call bell was within reach and providing education on fall prevention. However, after several falls, recommendations such as hourly monitoring and the use of assistive devices were not incorporated into the care plan. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight, stating that while the care plan may not have been updated, staff were informed of the necessary interventions. This lack of documentation and formal revision of the care plan represents a deficiency in the facility's adherence to regulatory requirements.
Deficiencies in Timely Care and Treatment for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely treatment and care for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their quality of care. Resident #10, who had severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls, suffered a fall resulting in a nondisplaced transverse fracture of the distal malleolus. Despite an orthopedic recommendation for a CAM boot and physical therapy, there was a significant delay in obtaining and applying the CAM boot, as well as initiating physical therapy. The facility lacked a clear policy for ordering orthopedic devices, leading to confusion among staff about who was responsible for ordering the CAM boot. This resulted in Resident #10 not receiving the necessary support to aid in their recovery and prevent further injury. Resident #22, diagnosed with end-stage renal disease, experienced severe pruritus, leading to visible excoriations on their skin. Despite the resident's complaints and visible signs of scratching, the nursing staff failed to notify the physician, resulting in a delay in appropriate treatment. The staff attributed the itching to the resident's kidney disease and advised the use of lotion and petroleum jelly, which were inadequate for the resident's condition. The Medical Director was not informed of the resident's condition and stated that a moisturizing cream should have been prescribed to alleviate the symptoms. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and awareness regarding the residents' conditions. The Director of Nursing and Physical Therapy Director acknowledged the delays and miscommunications in ordering and applying the CAM boot for Resident #10. Similarly, the nursing staff failed to adequately assess and address Resident #22's skin condition, leading to prolonged discomfort and potential skin damage. These deficiencies highlight the need for improved communication and adherence to professional standards of care within the facility.
Expired Medical Equipment Found in Medication Storage Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and professional standards of practice. During a recertification survey, it was observed that the medication storage room contained expired medical equipment used for administering medications. Specifically, the surveyors found three expired 20 gauge needles, five Medtronic quick sets, and one intravenous dressing change kit with expired prep swabs. The facility's policy on medication storage requires that outdated or deteriorated medications and equipment be immediately removed from stock and disposed of according to procedures for medication destruction. However, the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the expired equipment should not have been in the medication storage room and took responsibility for ensuring that expired items are removed. The Director of Nursing stated that they would discard the expired items and review the storage room for any other expired materials.
Food Temperature Deficiency in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food and drink at safe and appetizing temperatures during a recertification survey. Specifically, three out of five food items served from a steam table, including shrimp salad, baked chicken, and apricots, were found to be within the temperature danger zone, which is above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit. This temperature range allows the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. A resident reported that food was consistently cold at dinner time, and it was observed that food took 30 minutes to be delivered after plating. During an observation, the shrimp salad was recorded at 50 degrees Fahrenheit, the baked chicken at 127.5 degrees Fahrenheit, and the apricots at 46 degrees Fahrenheit. The Food Service Director acknowledged that the steam table, which had been in use for about six months, was not maintaining food at the required temperatures, with hot food needing to be over 140 degrees Fahrenheit and cold food under 40 degrees Fahrenheit.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Residents with Indwelling Devices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions for two residents with indwelling medical devices. Resident #22, who had a nephrostomy tube, was not placed under Enhanced Barrier Precautions as required. Observations revealed that staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care, and there was no signage or PPE cart outside the resident's room. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of awareness and education regarding the need for Enhanced Barrier Precautions for this resident, despite physician orders indicating such precautions were necessary. Similarly, Resident #19, who had a urostomy tube, did not have Enhanced Barrier Precautions in place. The resident reported that staff did not wear gowns when assisting with showers, and there was no signage or PPE available near their room. The facility's policy required Enhanced Barrier Precautions for residents with indwelling devices, but this was not followed, leading to a deficiency in maintaining a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of infections.
Failure to Timely Transmit MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to electronically transmit encoded and completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required 14 days of the final MDS assessment completion date. This deficiency was identified during a recertification survey and was evident for two residents reviewed for assessment. The MDS assessments for these residents exceeded 120 days from the date of completion before being submitted to CMS. Specifically, the discharge MDS assessments for both residents were initially rejected on March 31, 2024, and were not resubmitted until June 25, 2024. During an interview, the Registered Nurse MDS Specialist admitted to not running the necessary reports to ensure all MDS assessments were accepted by CMS until June 25, 2024, which led to the oversight. The rejections were due to issues in section A of the assessments.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 160 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Goshen
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Nursing And Rehab At Goshen | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Valley View Center For Nursing Care And Rehab | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Campbell Hall Rehabilitation Center Inc | 4.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Middletown Park Rehab & Health Care Center | 5.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Highland Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Glen Arden Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.