Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Franklin Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Call Bell Left Out of Reach: A resident with intact cognition and functional impairment of both upper and lower extremities was repeatedly observed with the call bell out of reach, including hanging on the wall and later on the floor under the wheelchair. The resident said they often did not know where the call bell was and had resorted to calling out for help, while a CNA, RN, and DON each described staff responsibility for keeping the call bell within reach.
Resident bathing preferences were not honored for two residents. One resident who was cognitively intact said they wanted a shower every day but was scheduled for only one shower per week, with no documented evidence that the preference was addressed. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment was also limited to one weekly shower despite the representative requesting more frequent showers. Staff, including CNAs, an LPN, an RN supervisor, and the DON, described a routine weekly shower schedule and inconsistent awareness of requests for additional showers.
Improper Use of Perimeter Mattresses and Bedside Positioning: Surveyors found two residents with perimeter mattresses being used as bed boundaries or fall-prevention devices without physician orders or consistent restraint/device reassessments. One resident with severe cognitive and physical impairment was observed on a perimeter mattress, while another resident with quadriplegia was observed on a perimeter mattress with an armchair and pillow wedged beside the bed; staff and the spouse said the setup was intended to prevent falls or provide sensory feedback.
Failure to review and revise care plans after assessments: two residents had outdated care plans that did not reflect current status. One resident with CVA, vascular dementia, and dysphagia had an Activities care plan that had not been updated after the annual assessment, and another resident with DM, HTN, severe cognitive impairment, toileting dependence, and a recent UTI had a bladder/genitourinary care plan that had not been revised after assessments. Staff interviews confirmed the care plans were not being updated as required.
Medication administration did not meet professional standards for two residents. An RN administered an IV antibiotic through a midline without flushing the line with saline before the dose, despite a SASH order. Another RN gave multiple medications through a gastrostomy tube without flushing water between each medication, even though facility protocol and leadership stated the tube should be flushed before, between, and after medications.
An RN failed to follow the SASH sequence for an IV antibiotic through a midline by not flushing before or after administration, and another RN gave multiple meds via G-tube without flushing between doses. The resident with the G-tube had seizure disorder, malnutrition, and GERD, and facility leaders confirmed that flushes were expected before, between, and after enteral meds and for each IV antibiotic dose.
Unsecured medications were found in an unlocked nursing supervisor office on Unit 6. Blister packs for several residents and a bag of unmixed IV antibiotics were left in an open box unattended while staff were not present. RN staff gave conflicting accounts about whether the office was kept locked, and the DON stated discontinued and expired meds are not supposed to be kept in that office.
Inaccurate medication route documentation: A resident with hypothyroidism, seizure disorder, and malnutrition was receiving meds via gastrostomy tube, but the MAR/orders listed Levothyroxine and Keppra as oral. An RN was observed crushing Levothyroxine and administering it through the tube, and staff interviews confirmed the route was documented incorrectly.
A nurse was observed administering medications via G-tube to a resident with chronic lung disease, respiratory failure, and atrial fibrillation while changing gloves three times without performing hand hygiene between glove changes. Facility policy required hand hygiene after glove removal and during med prep/admin, and the RN, nursing supervisor, DON, and IP all stated that hand hygiene should occur between glove changes.
An LPN attempted to give pain medication to a resident with severe cognitive impairment after the resident refused by covering their mouth. The LPN removed the resident’s hand and placed the medication in the resident’s mouth, and the resident spit it out. Staff later noted a scratch and bleeding on the resident’s lower lip, but the RN supervisor and DON did not view the event as abuse.
Failure to investigate an abuse allegation and protect a resident from further abuse. An LPN gave pain medication to a resident who refused it by covering the mouth, then removed the resident’s hand and placed the medication in the mouth after the resident spit it out. The allegation was not immediately investigated, and the LPN was not removed from resident access at the time the incident was reported.
A resident with bilateral BKA, severely impaired cognition, and high fall risk was found on the floor in the room, but a CNA picked the resident up and placed the resident back in bed before the RN supervisor assessed the resident. The resident later had a small scratch/cut to the lower lip with minimal bleeding, and the record also referenced a prior floor event and inconsistent documentation about the injury.
The facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their representatives were invited to participate in care plan meetings, as required. This deficiency was identified for three residents, including one who was cognitively intact and two who were cognitively impaired.
The facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment for a resident when maintenance staff cleaned an air conditioning unit in the resident's room without notifying the nurse, resulting in dust blowing inside the room while the resident was on oxygen therapy. The maintenance staff did not follow the facility's policy requiring notification of the nurse before performing such work.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS documentation for two residents' catheter use. One resident with a Foley catheter was not documented, and another with a suprapubic catheter was incorrectly documented as having an ostomy. Both errors were acknowledged by the staff responsible.
A facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident's preference not to use a urinary catheter privacy bag. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter, was observed multiple times with an exposed Foley catheter bag. Despite the resident's refusal due to the bag getting caught in the wheelchair, no care plan was documented to address this preference. Interviews with staff confirmed the oversight.
Call Bell Left Out of Reach
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s call bell was kept within reach, despite the resident having intact cognition and functional impairment on both sides of both upper and lower extremities. Resident #238, who was admitted with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, was observed in bed on multiple occasions with the call bell out of reach. On one observation, the call bell was wound up and hanging on the wall; on another, it was on the floor under the resident’s wheelchair and not accessible to the resident. The resident stated they often did not know where the call bell was and said they could use it when available, but had resorted to calling out for nurses when help was needed. A CNA stated it was the CNAs’ responsibility to ensure the call bell was within reach after care or changing sheets. An RN stated the resident used to use the call bell more often but now tends to call out by name, and the RN was unsure whether this was a preference or because the call bell was not available. The DON stated call bells should be within the resident’s reach and that all nursing staff are responsible for ensuring this.
Resident bathing preferences were not honored
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for bathing preferences for two residents. The report states that Resident #13 had diagnoses including paraplegia, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease, and was assessed as cognitively intact and requiring moderate assistance with showering. Although the resident stated a preference for a shower every day, the resident was scheduled for and received only one shower per week, and there was no documented evidence in progress notes that the preference was addressed. Staff interviews reflected that showers were routinely scheduled once weekly, with extra showers dependent on scheduling or staff availability. Resident #188, who had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, and hypertension, was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for showering. The resident's representative stated they had requested more showers at admission and were told the resident could only have one shower per week, despite wanting more showers so the resident could feel more comfortable. The resident's care documentation also showed a weekly shower schedule, and the resident received showers once per week during the reviewed period. Interviews with nursing assistants, an LPN, an RN supervisor, and the DON showed that the facility generally scheduled residents for one shower per week, with showers given as needed or if a resident or family requested one. However, staff also stated they were unaware of requests for additional showers for Resident #188, and the DON stated they were unaware residents were not receiving extra showers when requested. The report cites 10 NYCRR 415.5(b)(1-3) in relation to the deficiency.
Improper Use of Perimeter Mattresses and Bedside Positioning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents were free from physical restraints that were not required to treat medical symptoms. Surveyors observed one resident lying on a perimeter mattress on several occasions, and observed another resident lying on a perimeter mattress with an armchair and pillow wedged on the left side of the bed between the upper part of the bed and the window area. The cited concern was that these devices and positioning were being used for bed boundary control and fall prevention rather than for a documented medical treatment purpose. One resident had diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident, aphasia, hemiplegia, and seizure disorder. The quarterly MDS documented severely impaired cognition, dependence for personal hygiene and transfers, and limited range of motion. The resident was observed in bed with a perimeter mattress that had raised sides and built-in bolsters. Review of physician orders showed no order for the perimeter mattress. A restraint/device assessment from 12/06/2024 stated the resident could not understand or recall the purpose and safe use of the device and that the resident continued to slide to the edge of the bed without it, but no further assessment was completed. The care plan identified fall and injury risk and included a concave/scoop mattress or perimeter mattress cover as an intervention. Staff interviews stated the perimeter mattress was used to prevent falls, provide sensory feedback, or act as a bed boundary, and several staff acknowledged there was no physician order and that ongoing restraint/device assessments were not being completed every quarter and annually. The DON stated perimeter mattresses were not identified as restraints and were used for safety awareness and as a bed boundary, while also stating that the required ongoing assessment should have been conducted but could not explain why it was missed. The other resident had diagnoses including quadriplegia, neuropathic pain, and muscle spasticity. The resident was observed lying on a perimeter mattress with an armchair and pillow wedged beside the bed near the window area. The significant change MDS documented intact cognition, dependence for bed mobility and transfers, and no restraints used. A restraint/device assessment dated 02/17/2026 stated the perimeter mattress would provide sensory feedback for the edges of the bed and that the resident could understand and recall its purpose and safe use, but there was no physician order and no documented medical necessity for the mattress. The care plan included a perimeter mattress cover, floor mats, and a low bed after a fall out of bed with no injury. Interviews with the spouse and staff confirmed the spouse was placing the chair against the bed to prevent the resident from falling, and staff stated the chair was not supposed to be positioned that way because of injury risk.
Failure to Review and Revise Care Plans After Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised to reflect residents’ status after each assessment. For Resident #68, who had diagnoses of CVA, vascular dementia, and dysphagia and was documented as severely cognitively impaired on the Quarterly MDS, the Activities care plan had been effective since 03/18/2024 and the last review note was dated 11/20/2024. There was no documented evidence that the Activities care plan had been reviewed and revised after the Annual assessment on 12/04/2024. For Resident #4, who had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and hypertension and was documented as severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, the bladder elimination/indwelling catheter/genitourinary care plan was initiated on 12/21/2021 and the last update/review note was dated 12/2/2024. The resident also had a physician’s order for Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for a UTI. There was no documented evidence that the bladder care plan was reviewed or revised after each assessment, and staff interviews indicated the care plan had not been updated as often as expected.
Medication Administration Not Performed Per Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality during medication administration for two residents. One resident had diagnoses including chronic lung disease, respiratory failure, and atrial fibrillation, and had an order for piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 grams IV every six hours for six weeks with a midline flush using SASH before and after medication administration. During observation, the RN prepared the IV antibiotic and supplies but did not flush the midline with saline before attaching the primed antibiotic line. A second resident had diagnoses including seizure disorder, malnutrition, and gastroesophageal reflux disease and received medications through a gastrostomy tube. During observation, the RN stopped the tube feeding and gave approximately 15 mL of water, then administered ten medications one after another through the tube without flushing water between each medication. After all medications were given, the RN flushed the tube with approximately 50 mL of water and then an additional 40 mL before restarting the feeding. Interviews confirmed the expected procedures for both types of medication administration. The RN who administered the IV antibiotic stated they forgot to flush the midline with saline before giving the antibiotic. Nursing leadership stated that SASH should be performed for every IV antibiotic administration and that gastrostomy tube medications should be flushed with water before, between, and after medications. The DON also stated the gastrostomy tube medication administration had recently been in-serviced for nursing staff.
Medication Administration Errors with IV Midline and G-Tube
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality for two residents during medication administration. One resident had diagnoses including chronic lung disease, respiratory failure, and atrial fibrillation, and had an order for piperacillin-tazobactam by IV through a midline with SASH flushing. During observation, the RN prepared the antibiotic and supplies but did not flush the midline with saline before attaching the primed antibiotic line, and after administration the line was not flushed with saline or heparin. The RN later stated the SASH sequence had been done in the morning to check patency but acknowledged forgetting to flush before the antibiotic and discarding the supplies without flushing afterward. A second resident had diagnoses including seizure disorder, malnutrition, and gastroesophageal reflux disease and received medications through a gastrostomy tube. During observation, the RN stopped the tube feeding, gave about 15 mL of water, and administered ten medications one after another through the tube without flushing between medications. After all medications were given, the RN flushed the tube with about 50 mL of water and then another 40 mL before restarting the feeding. The RN stated that flushing between medications is sometimes done but was not done in this case because the resident was receiving many medications. Interviews with supervisory staff and the DON confirmed that the facility expected SASH flushing for each IV antibiotic administration and water flushes before, between, and after gastrostomy tube medications. The DON also stated that if medication remained in the cup, more water should be used to dissolve it and administer the full dose, and that staff had recently been in-serviced on gastrostomy tube medication administration. The report cites 10 NYCRR 415.11(c)(3)(i).
Unsecured medications left unattended in unlocked nursing supervisor office
Penalty
Summary
Drugs and biologicals were not stored in locked compartments on Unit 6. During observation, seven blister packs of medications for Residents #26, #59, and #253, including Omeprazole, Famotidine, Icosapent, Escitalopram, and Amlodipine, along with a bag containing several vials of unmixed antibiotics for Resident #47, including [NAME]/Tazobactam (Zosyn), were found in an open box in the unlocked nursing supervisor's office across from the nurse's station. The medications were left unattended and not supervised by staff while the office remained unlocked and staff were intermittently passing by the area. The facility policy stated that drugs and biologicals are to be stored in a secure and orderly manner and accessible only to licensed nursing and pharmacy personnel. RN #4 stated the medications were supposed to be brought to the nursing supervisors office on the main level to be returned to the pharmacy and said the Unit 6 nursing supervisor's office door is kept unlocked throughout the shift because nurses come and go. RN #5 stated discontinued and expired medications were collected and placed in the Unit 6 nursing supervisor's office to be brought down by the night shift, and also stated the office door is always locked, though RN #5 could not explain why surveyors observed it unlocked with medications unattended. The DON stated nurses are instructed to bag discontinued and expired medications and bring them downstairs to the nursing office for return to the pharmacy, and that medications are not supposed to be kept in the unit nursing supervisor's office.
Inaccurate Medication Route Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurately documented for one resident receiving tube feeding. Resident #28, who had diagnoses including hypothyroidism, seizure disorder, and malnutrition, had physician orders documented for Levothyroxine 150 microgram tablet to be given by oral route daily and Keppra 100 milligram per milliliter oral solution to be given by oral route three times a day, even though the resident was receiving medications via gastrostomy tube. During observation, Registered Nurse #7 was seen preparing and administering Levothyroxine by crushing the tablet and giving it through the gastrostomy tube. During interviews, Registered Nurse #7 stated that the medication administration process includes verifying the right patient, medication, dose, time, and route, and acknowledged that the orders for Levothyroxine and Keppra were documented as oral instead of gastrostomy tube. The nurse stated that all medications were being given via gastrostomy tube for this resident. The nursing supervisor and the Director of Nursing stated that nurses and nursing supervisors are responsible for identifying incorrect medication routes and notifying the provider, and the Nurse Practitioner stated that the route may have been entered incorrectly because the resident did not have a gastrostomy tube on a previous admission.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene Between Glove Changes During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. During observation of medication administration for Resident #7, who had diagnoses including chronic lung disease, respiratory failure, and atrial fibrillation, Registered Nurse #8 was observed administering three medications via gastrostomy tube and changing gloves three times without performing hand hygiene between glove changes. The facility policy on hand hygiene stated that hand hygiene is required after glove removal and during medication preparation and administration before moving on to the next task or resident. During interview, Registered Nurse #8 stated that hand hygiene should be performed between glove changes and said they were rushing and nervous during the observation and forgot to perform it. The nursing supervisor, DON, and Infection Preventionist each stated that hand hygiene should be performed before and after glove use and between glove changes.
Physical Abuse During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse when an LPN attempted to administer pain medication to a resident who refused it. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, required partial/moderate assistance with personal care and had diagnoses including acquired absence of the left leg below the knee, major depressive disorder, and falls. During the medication attempt, the resident covered their mouth to refuse the medication, but the LPN removed the resident’s hand and placed the medication in the resident’s mouth. The resident then spit the medication out, and the LPN picked it up and gave it back to the resident. The resident had been found on the floor during the same shift, and staff later documented a small scratch mark to the lower lip with minimal bleeding. Nursing documentation and physician notes described a lower lip or chin scratch and bleeding, with the site cleaned and bacitracin applied. The facility’s occurrence report stated the resident was observed on the floor and that the facility investigated the alleged incident and concluded there was no indication of abuse or neglect. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident was refusing the medication and that the LPN removed the resident’s hand from their mouth to give the medication. The RN supervisor and DON stated they did not view the event as abuse, and the DON stated the LPN was not suspended and the incident was not reported to law enforcement or the State Department of Health at the time. The administrator later stated the allegation was reported to the New York State Department of Health after additional review, but the facility initially did not believe abuse occurred.
Failure to Investigate Abuse Allegation and Protect Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated and that the resident was protected from further abuse during the investigation. On 05/01/2026 at approximately 11:25 PM, an LPN was giving Resident #1 pain medication when the resident refused by placing a hand over the mouth. The LPN removed the resident’s hand and placed the medication in the resident’s mouth; the resident spit the medication out, and the LPN picked up the medication and gave it to the resident. The facility did not immediately investigate the allegation after it was reported to the RN supervisor, and the LPN was not removed from direct care and access to residents at that time. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including acquired absence of the left leg below the knee, major depressive disorder, and falls. The quarterly MDS dated 04/21/2026 documented severe cognitive impairment and the need for partial/moderate assistance with personal care. The occurrence report summary documented that Resident #1 was observed on the floor on 05/01/2026 at approximately 11:20 PM, had a small scratch mark to the lower lip with minimal bleeding, and received Tylenol for pain. The facility initiated the abuse investigation on 05/07/2026, and the Administrator stated the facility was not informed of the allegation until the Department of Health arrived in the facility.
Failure to Assess Resident Before Returning to Bed After a Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents when a resident with acquired bilateral below-knee amputations and severely impaired cognition was found on the floor in the resident’s room. The resident was identified as high risk for falls on the Fall/Injury Risk Evaluation and required partial/moderate assistance with personal care according to the quarterly MDS. On 05/01/2026 at approximately 11:20 PM, the resident was observed on the floor, and the CNA picked the resident up and placed the resident back into bed before the resident was assessed by the RN supervisor. The record shows that the resident had a prior fall event in the room, with documentation that the resident was found on the floor mat and later had a small scratch to the lower lip with minimal bleeding. The facility’s investigation report initially documented no visible injury, while later notes documented a scratch or cut to the lower lip/chin and bleeding from the lip. During interviews, the CNA stated the resident was picked up and returned to bed before the RN assessment, and the DON stated that residents found on the floor must be assessed by an RN supervisor before being placed back into bed.
Failure to Involve Residents in Care Plan Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that residents and/or their representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in the revision and/or review of the comprehensive care plan. This deficiency was identified for three residents during the recertification survey. Specifically, Resident #31, who was moderately cognitively impaired, and their designated representative were not invited to quarterly care plan meetings. Similarly, Resident #142, who was cognitively impaired, and their representative were not invited to any care plan meetings. Resident #165, who was cognitively intact, also reported not being invited to any care plan meetings for a long time. The facility's policy stated that residents have the right to participate in the planning process, including identifying individuals to be included. However, the social services notes and care plan meeting reports for the three residents showed no documented evidence of invitations to the care plan meetings. Interviews with the social worker and the Social Work Director revealed a misunderstanding of the requirement to invite residents and/or their representatives to quarterly care plan meetings, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Ensure Safe and Homelike Environment During Maintenance Work
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that residents were provided a safe and homelike environment, as evidenced by an incident involving Resident #5. On 02/22/2024, a Maintenance staff was observed cleaning the air conditioning unit in Resident #5's room while the resident was sleeping in bed with oxygen via nasal cannula. Dust was observed blowing inside the room during the cleaning process. The facility's policy requires maintenance staff to notify the nurse on duty before entering a resident's room for maintenance work, which was not followed in this instance. The Inservice Coordinator confirmed that they were not notified about the maintenance work in Resident #5's room on the specified date. Resident #5 has diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder, Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia, and Sleep Apnea, and requires oxygen therapy due to episodes of shortness of breath. The Comprehensive Care Plan for Respiratory: Oxygen Use, initiated on 01/11/2024, includes interventions such as providing oxygen as ordered and assessing for discomfort with breathing. Interviews with the Maintenance Assistant and the Director of Maintenance revealed that the Maintenance Assistant forgot to inform the nurse about the work in Resident #5's room, leading to the failure to follow the facility's policy and compromising the resident's safety and comfort.
Inaccurate MDS Documentation for Catheter Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the residents' status. This deficiency was identified during a Recertification Survey, where it was found that the MDS for two residents did not accurately document their catheter use. Specifically, Resident #181, who was admitted with a Foley catheter, had no documentation of the catheter in the MDS. The resident had diagnoses of Stroke and Cardiac Arrest and was severely cognitively impaired, dependent on bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toilet use. The omission was confirmed by the MDS Assessor, who admitted to missing the documentation despite cross-checking procedures in place. Similarly, Resident #25, who had a suprapubic catheter, was incorrectly documented as having an ostomy in the MDS. This resident had diagnoses of Obstructive Uropathy, Quadriplegia, and Respiratory Failure, with intact cognition. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged the error, stating it was an oversight. Both residents had comprehensive care plans and physician's orders that clearly documented their catheter use, but these were not accurately reflected in the MDS, leading to the identified deficiencies.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident's Preference
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to meet a resident's preferences. Specifically, a comprehensive care plan was not developed to address a resident's preference not to use a urinary catheter privacy bag. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter, was observed multiple times in the dining room with an exposed Foley catheter bag hanging on the arm of their wheelchair. Despite the resident's refusal to use the privacy bag due to it getting caught in the wheelchair, there was no documented evidence of a care plan addressing this preference. Interviews with the resident and facility staff confirmed that the resident had a black bag to cover the urine bag but chose not to use it. The Assistant Director of Nursing and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the resident's refusal to use the privacy bag should have been documented in the care plan. The facility's policy required the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan, but this was not followed in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,447 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 18 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Flushing
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Island Care Center Inc | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| The Pavilion At Queens For Rehabilitation & Nursin | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Elmhurst Care Center, Inc, | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Sapphire Center For Rehabilitation & Nursing Of Ce | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Cliffside Rehab & Residential Health Care Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Franklin Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.