Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Aurelia Osborn Fox Memorial Hospital during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with significant mobility and medical issues was assessed by physical therapy as requiring two staff for bed mobility, but this need was not updated in the care plan. As a result, a CNA attempted to reposition the resident alone, leading to a fall from bed and a hip fracture. The resident was hospitalized with multiple complications and later expired. The facility did not update the care plan or provide staff training following the incident.
The facility did not provide enough licensed nurses and CNAs to meet resident care needs, resulting in delayed responses to call bells, persistent odors indicating lack of timely personal care, and staff being unable to complete all required tasks. Staffing records showed consistent shortfalls compared to required hours, and staff interviews confirmed that care was limited to essential tasks due to inadequate staffing.
Surveyors found that medications, including insulin pens, inhalers, and eye drops, were not consistently labeled with open or expiration dates, and some expired drugs were present in medication rooms and carts. An LPN was unable to explain proper labeling procedures, and an unopened insulin pen was stored unrefrigerated. The DON confirmed that staff were responsible for maintaining proper medication storage and labeling, but these practices were not followed.
Surveyors found that the facility did not consistently provide food and drink that were palatable, attractive, or served at safe temperatures. Multiple residents complained of inedible, cold meals, tough meat, undercooked vegetables, and warm beverages. Observations confirmed these issues, including the serving of expired milk and food that was difficult to chew. Staff interviews indicated that complaints increased after changes in food service, and facility policies regarding food quality and storage were not consistently followed.
The facility did not consistently implement infection control measures, as several residents with wounds were not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and an LPN failed to follow proper infection control practices during a dressing change. Leadership interviews revealed uncertainty about when to apply specific precautions, and staff training on infection control was lacking.
Surveyors found persistent foul odors of urine, feces, and cannabis across three units, with soiled carpets, dirty linens left under a sink, and staff entering the building with noticeable smoke odors. Despite facility policy prohibiting offensive odors and requiring staff to present a professional image, these issues were not promptly addressed, resulting in an environment that was not functional, sanitary, or comfortable for residents, staff, and the public.
Surveyors found that several residents were not treated with dignity and respect, including two residents whose Foley catheters were left uncovered and visible from hallways and common areas, a resident who reported staff speaking to them in a demeaning way and ignoring their requests regarding privacy curtains, a resident whose repeated toileting requests were not promptly addressed, and a resident who reported rough care and staff with offensive odors. Staff interviews confirmed that privacy protocols were not followed and that there were previous reports of inappropriate staff conduct.
Two residents did not have their care plans updated by the interdisciplinary team after significant changes were identified in assessments. One resident's need for two-person assist with bed mobility was not added to the care plan after PT assessment, resulting in an injury. Another resident's care plan was not revised to reflect a gradual dose reduction of an antipsychotic, with no goals or monitoring interventions documented.
Three residents were admitted without documented evidence that a required PASARR screening for mental disorders or intellectual disabilities was completed prior to admission. Each had diagnoses such as bipolar disorder, depression, or adjustment disorder, but the PASARR forms either indicated no serious mental illness or were not completed before admission, contrary to facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed that the forms are typically reviewed by social work and completed by referring agencies, but documentation was missing for these cases.
A resident with dementia and anxiety disorder did not have a comprehensive care plan addressing medical issues related to medication use. The care plan for psychotropic medication lacked specific side effects to monitor and was not updated after a dose reduction. Nursing staff cited time constraints and unclear responsibilities as reasons for incomplete care planning, and the DON acknowledged required information was missing.
A resident with legal blindness and hearing deficits was not provided with meaningful or accommodating activities, despite care plan directives to offer adaptive materials such as audiobooks and large print. The resident expressed a desire for accessible activities but did not receive ongoing offers or appropriate accommodations, and no assistive devices were present in their room. Staff interviews confirmed a lack of follow-up and documentation of individualized engagement.
Surveyors found that the facility's medication error rate exceeded five percent due to two incidents: an LPN selected the wrong medication for a resident with cancer and depression, and another LPN improperly opened a delayed-release capsule for a resident with diabetes and dementia. Both actions were inconsistent with facility policy and manufacturer guidelines.
Surveyors found that the kitchen failed to meet food service safety standards due to improper sanitizing by the dishwashing machine, unclean floors with food debris and build-up, and a lack of effective chemical sanitizer in the 3-compartment sink.
A facility did not ensure a thorough investigation of an alleged abuse incident involving a resident with dementia, as not all relevant staff were interviewed and required documentation was incomplete. The investigation was deemed inconclusive due to insufficient information and lack of corroborating witnesses.
Two residents were neglected, resulting in injuries. One resident, requiring a two-person assist for transfers, was injured when a CNA transferred them alone. Another resident, who needed a chair alarm, fell and sustained injuries when the alarm was not placed by the CNA.
The facility failed to ensure two residents were free from significant medication errors. One resident did not receive their Synthroid medication, and another did not receive their Aspercreme patch as ordered. Both residents reported inconsistencies in medication administration, which was confirmed through interviews and record reviews.
Failure to Update Care Plan Results in Resident Harm
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect the need for two staff members to assist with bed mobility, as assessed by physical therapy. The resident, who had diagnoses including generalized osteoarthritis, transient ischemic attacks, and a history of repeated falls, was determined by physical therapy to require total dependence and maximum assistance of two staff for bed mobility due to increased weakness, instability, and hypotension. Despite this assessment, the care plan continued to indicate only one staff member was needed for bed mobility, and this information was not communicated or incorporated into the resident's care plan. On the day of the incident, a certified nurse aide provided incontinence care and attempted to reposition the resident in bed alone. During this process, the resident was rolled too close to the edge of the bed, resulting in the resident's head and legs hanging over the side. The aide was unable to return the resident to bed and, while attempting to lower the resident to the floor, lost balance, causing both to fall. The resident landed on their left side and initially complained of pain to the right elbow, but later reported severe pain in the right hip. Subsequent assessment revealed a femoral neck fracture, and the resident was transferred to the hospital, where additional complications including septic shock, myocardial infarction, and respiratory failure were documented. The resident was placed on comfort care and expired at the hospital. The facility's investigation confirmed that the care plan was not updated to reflect the physical therapy assessment, and there was no follow-up training or education for staff regarding falls after the incident.
Insufficient Nursing Staff Resulting in Delayed Resident Care and Unmet Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of all residents, as evidenced by both direct observations and review of staffing records. Multiple instances were documented where residents were not assisted with care in a timely manner, including prolonged wait times for call bells to be answered and persistent odors of urine and feces in hallways and common areas. These observations indicated that residents were not receiving prompt personal care, and staff were unable to respond to requests for assistance as needed. Staffing sheets reviewed for the period showed that the number of licensed nurses and Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) scheduled consistently fell short of the facility's own staffing plan and the calculated hours of care required based on census. On several days, there were not enough licensed nurses or CNAs scheduled to meet the minimum required hours of care per resident per day. In some cases, nurse supervisors had to take on direct care assignments due to insufficient staffing, and on one occasion, a unit had no nurse scheduled at all. The shortfall in staffing was present across multiple shifts and units, with the greatest deficits noted on evening shifts and weekends. Interviews with staff further confirmed the impact of inadequate staffing. CNAs and nurses reported being unable to complete all required tasks, with care being limited to essential activities such as feeding and changing residents. Staff described difficulty in providing timely assistance, especially for residents requiring two-person assistance, and noted that paperwork and care plan reviews were not completed as thoroughly as needed. The Director of Nursing acknowledged ongoing staffing challenges and described efforts to recruit and repurpose staff, but also indicated that some nurses were overburdened with multiple roles.
Deficient Medication Labeling and Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored according to professional standards in all medication rooms and carts reviewed. Specifically, expired medications were found in medication rooms, including a bottle of sleep aid and melatonin, as well as an open bottle of tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD). Several medications, such as insulin pens, inhalers, and eye drops, were either missing open or expiration dates, had illegible dates, or had discrepancies between the dates on the box and the bottle. Additionally, an unopened insulin pen was found unrefrigerated in a medication cart, contrary to storage requirements. During interviews, nursing staff were unable to verbalize the correct procedures for labeling and tracking expiration dates for medications with shortened shelf lives after opening. Staff also demonstrated a lack of awareness regarding pharmacy resources for medication expiration information. The Director of Nursing confirmed that all nursing staff were responsible for maintaining medication storage standards and that these requirements were covered during initial and annual competencies. However, the observations indicated that these standards were not consistently followed across the facility.
Failure to Provide Palatable, Safe, and Properly Prepared Food and Drink
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to ensure food and drink were palatable, attractive, and served at safe and appetizing temperatures for the majority of residents reviewed. Multiple residents reported that meals were inedible, cold, and not what they ordered, with specific complaints about tough meat, undercooked vegetables, and warm drinks. Observations during meal service confirmed these issues, with food items such as chicken being dry, rice being unappetizing, and beverages like juice and milk being served at temperatures above recommended levels. Additionally, expired milk was found on a resident's tray, and several residents received food that was difficult to chew or cut, including hard vegetables and tough meat. Interviews with residents and staff further substantiated these findings. Residents consistently voiced dissatisfaction with the quality, temperature, and palatability of the food, noting that their meal preferences were often not honored and that the food lacked taste and variety. Staff interviews revealed that complaints had increased following recent changes in food service, with reports that food trays were not delivered in a timely manner, contributing to temperature issues. The Food Service Director acknowledged concerns about food temperature and delivery, while the Clinical Nutrition Manager confirmed ongoing complaints about food being under or overcooked. Facility policies required the provision of palatable food, appropriate food substitutes, and safe storage of food and beverages, including monitoring refrigerator temperatures. However, the survey found that these policies were not consistently followed, as evidenced by the serving of expired and improperly stored milk, and the lack of timely food delivery. The failure to meet these standards resulted in widespread resident dissatisfaction and noncompliance with regulatory requirements for food service.
Failure to Implement and Maintain Effective Infection Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program as required by policy and regulation. Specifically, several residents with wounds requiring dressing changes were not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and infection control practices were not consistently followed during wound care procedures. For example, residents with heel wounds did not have documented orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, despite their conditions necessitating such measures according to facility policy. During direct observation, an LPN performed a dressing change on a resident's heel wound without changing gloves after removing the soiled dressing, washed the wound from the outside in rather than inside out, and fanned the open wound with the clean dressing before application. These actions did not align with accepted infection control practices. The LPN was also unable to recall when they last received training on infection control and dressing changes, indicating a lapse in ongoing staff competency and education. Interviews with facility leadership revealed inconsistencies and uncertainty regarding the application of Enhanced Barrier Precautions versus Contact Precautions, particularly for residents with wounds, indwelling devices, or colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms. Leadership stated that precaution orders required physician authorization and acknowledged the need for further discussion and clarification of protocols upon the return of the Infection Preventionist. These findings demonstrate a lack of consistent implementation and oversight of infection control measures for residents at risk of infection.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary and Odor-Free Environment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment across all three units. Strong odors of urine and feces were present in multiple areas, including hallways and common areas. The carpeted floor on one unit was soiled with multiple stains, and dirty linens were found on the floor under a sink in another unit. Staff were made aware of these conditions during the survey, but no immediate care was provided to residents present in affected areas for at least 20 minutes. Additionally, a strong odor consistent with cannabis was detected near a medication cart, and staff interviews confirmed that an LPN had smoked prior to entering the building, resulting in a noticeable odor. The facility's Personal Appearance policy requires employees to avoid offensive odors, including those from tobacco or marijuana, and mandates that staff with such odors be sent home to address the issue. Despite this policy, staff and residents reported ongoing issues with staff entering the building smelling of smoke. The Director of Nursing and Administrator acknowledged these concerns, noting that some staff had been educated or sent home when identified, but the persistent odors and unsanitary conditions were not adequately addressed at the time of the survey.
Failure to Ensure Resident Dignity, Privacy, and Respect
Penalty
Summary
Multiple deficiencies were identified regarding the failure to honor residents' rights to dignity, respect, privacy, and self-determination. Two residents with Foley catheters were observed on several occasions to have their catheter bags fully visible from the hallway and common areas, without any cover bags in place. There were no documented interventions in their care plans to ensure privacy for these medical devices, and staff interviews confirmed that Foley catheters should have been covered but were not. Additionally, a urine odor was noted in one resident's room during these observations. Another resident reported that staff spoke to them in a demeaning manner and ignored their requests to have the privacy curtain open when their roommate was not present. This resident also experienced significant delays in response to their call bell, with staff failing to return as promised to provide needed care. The resident stated they had been waiting to be changed for several hours, and these observations were corroborated by the surveyor's direct observations and interviews. Further, a resident with severe dementia was observed repeatedly requesting to be toileted, but staff did not respond promptly. The LPN on duty acknowledged the request but deferred action, and the resident was only assisted after nearly an hour when another CNA from a different unit intervened. Another resident reported that some staff provided care in a rough manner and that staff sometimes smelled of marijuana and cigarettes, which the resident found offensive. The administrator confirmed receiving reports of rude or inappropriate staff interactions and acknowledged previous issues with staff conduct.
Failure to Revise Care Plans After Assessment Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, for two out of three residents reviewed for care planning. For one resident, the care plan for Activities of Daily Living and Bed Mobility was not updated following a physical therapy assessment and recommendations. The physical therapy assessment determined that the resident required maximum assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, but the care plan continued to reflect only partial/moderate assistance by one staff member. This lack of communication and care plan update resulted in the resident receiving care from only one staff member, during which the resident rolled out of bed and suffered a fractured hip. Another resident's comprehensive care plan for antipsychotic medication management was not revised to include goals and interventions when a gradual dose reduction was performed. The resident's Zyprexa dosage was decreased, but the care plan did not reflect this change or include monitoring parameters for the dose reduction. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the care plan should have been updated to document the medication change and to monitor for any complications related to the dose reduction, but no such documentation was found. The facility's own policy required that care plans be updated with measurable objectives and timeframes to address residents' needs as identified in assessments, and that changes in condition or treatment be promptly reflected in the care plan. Despite this, the interdisciplinary team did not update the care plans in response to significant changes in residents' conditions or treatments, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and the adverse event that occurred.
Failure to Complete Required PASARR Screening Prior to Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that each resident was properly screened for mental disorders or intellectual disabilities prior to admission, as required by policy and regulation. Specifically, for three residents reviewed, there was no documentation that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed by a qualified screener before their admission. The facility's policy mandates that all residents seeking admission must have a Level 1 PASARR screen completed by the referring agency or hospital, and if indicated, a referral for a Level 2 screen should be made to the appropriate agency. For one resident admitted with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pneumonia, the PASARR form indicated 'No' for serious mental illness, despite the presence of a bipolar disorder diagnosis. There was no evidence that the PASARR was completed prior to admission. Another resident, admitted with morbid obesity, adjustment disorder with anxiety, and depression, also had a PASARR form indicating 'No' for serious mental illness, with no documentation that the screening was completed before admission. A third resident, admitted with depression, panic disorder, and multiple sclerosis, similarly lacked evidence of a completed PASARR prior to admission. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the social work department was responsible for reviewing PASARR forms before admission, and that the forms were typically completed by the referring hospital or agency. Staff acknowledged that discrepancies in dates could occur if residents were transferred between settings, and clarified that a diagnosis alone was not sufficient for a positive PASARR screen unless the mental illness was active or required inpatient treatment at the time. Despite these explanations, the required documentation of pre-admission screening was not present for the three residents in question.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Medication Management
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and time frames to address all of a resident's needs, as required by regulation. Specifically, for one resident with diagnoses including moderate unspecified dementia with agitation, anxiety disorder, and a functional intestinal disorder, the care plan did not address the resident's medical issues related to medication management. The care plan for psychotropic drug use documented the use of Seroquel and included a goal to prevent negative side effects, but did not specify what side effects to monitor for, nor did it include measurable objectives or time frames. Record review showed that the resident had a physician order for Seroquel, with a recent dose reduction, but the care plan was not updated to reflect this change or to list potential side effects. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that care planning was lacking due to time constraints and unclear division of responsibilities among staff. The Director of Nursing confirmed that side effects should have been listed in the care plan, but this was not done. The facility's own policy required that all changes, including medication changes, be promptly addressed in the care plan, but this was not followed in this case.
Failure to Provide Individualized Activities and Accommodations for Sensory-Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with macular degeneration, legal blindness, and bilateral hearing deficits was not provided with meaningful or accommodating activities to maintain their highest quality of life. The resident was assessed as having intact cognition and the ability to communicate, but preferred to stay in their room due to poor vision and did not participate in group activities. The care plan indicated the resident should be offered materials such as large print, magnifiers, and audiobooks to support independent activities, but during observation, no assistive devices or adaptive materials were present in the resident's room. The resident expressed a desire to read but was unable to do so due to vision loss and reported not having any adaptive devices. Interviews with staff revealed that while the resident was initially offered audiobooks and declined, no further offers were made, and there was no documentation of 1:1 visits. The resident later stated they would like to listen to audiobooks if there was no cost, indicating a lack of ongoing assessment and accommodation of their evolving interests and needs. The facility failed to provide appropriate materials, supplies, and accommodations based on the resident's sensory requirements, resulting in the resident not receiving individualized activities as outlined in facility policy and regulatory requirements.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Regulatory Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent, resulting in an observed error rate of eight percent during a recertification survey. Specifically, two out of four residents observed during a medication pass experienced medication errors. For one resident with diagnoses including squamous cell carcinoma, depressive disorder, and urinary tract infection, an LPN selected the wrong medication (Doxycycline instead of the prescribed Duloxetine) from the medication cart, though the error was identified before administration. The resident was noted to be cognitively intact and able to communicate effectively. For another resident with type 2 diabetes, dementia, and depression, an LPN opened and poured out the contents of a Duloxetine delayed-release capsule, contrary to manufacturer guidelines that specify the capsule should not be opened, crushed, or mixed with food or liquids. The resident had severe cognitive impairment but could usually be understood. The LPN stated that all medications for this resident were crushed, and the DON confirmed that the pharmacy or physician should have been notified to prescribe an alternative form if crushing was necessary. These actions were inconsistent with both facility policy and manufacturer instructions, leading to the cited deficiency.
Food Service Safety Deficiencies in Kitchen Sanitation and Equipment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. The automatic dishwashing machine was not sanitizing properly, as its thermometer read only 140 degrees Fahrenheit during the final rinse cycle, which is below the required temperature. Additionally, the walk-in freezer floor and the floor under cooking equipment were soiled with food particles and black build-up. The concentration of quaternary ammonium compound used to sanitize food contact equipment in the 3-compartment sink was measured at zero parts per million at 74 degrees Fahrenheit, indicating that no effective sanitizing was occurring.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Alleged Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for one resident. On the evening shift, a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) reported to the supervisor that another CNA had handled a resident roughly and used foul language during care. The incident was reported at the end of the shift, after the alleged staff member had already left the building. The facility initiated an investigation the same night and suspended the accused CNA pending the outcome. However, there was no documented evidence that all staff involved were interviewed before the determination was made that the allegation was inconclusive. The facility's policy requires that all claims of abuse be thoroughly investigated, including obtaining signed and dated statements from all relevant staff and documenting reasons if any staff are not interviewed. In this case, although a log of nine witnesses was listed, not all staff were interviewed, and some interviews were conducted by phone. The Director of Nursing confirmed that not all interviews were completed, and there were no written or signed statements from staff regarding the incident. Some staff were no longer employed at the time of the investigation, further limiting the ability to gather complete information. The resident involved had diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia with severely impaired cognition, hypertension, and depression. At the time of the incident, the resident was sometimes able to understand and be understood, but could not recall the incident and denied psychological harm. A skin assessment revealed no injury. The investigation concluded as inconclusive due to insufficient information, as there were no witnesses to corroborate the allegation and not all required interviews and documentation were completed as per facility policy.
Neglect Resulting in Resident Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure residents were free from neglect for two residents reviewed. Specifically, one resident who required two staff to transfer via mechanical lift was injured when a Certified Nursing Aide transferred the resident by themselves. The resident complained of pain to the groin area during the transfer, and a subsequent assessment identified bruising. The Certified Nursing Aide admitted to transferring the resident independently due to being unable to locate a second caregiver and acknowledged understanding that the resident was a two-person assist transfer per the care plan. Another resident, who was care planned for having a chair alarm, sustained injuries when they attempted to transfer themselves and no chair alarm was present. The Certified Nursing Aide responsible for the resident admitted to forgetting to place the chair alarm after caring for them. The resident was found on the floor with multiple abrasions and bruises. The facility's investigative report confirmed that the chair alarm was not placed on the resident, leading to the fall and subsequent injuries.
Significant Medication Errors for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for two residents. Resident #5, who has mild cognitive impairment, hypothyroidism, and chronic venous insufficiency, did not receive their prescribed Synthroid medication on 3/27/2022. The Synthroid 50 micrograms was found in the sharps container, and the Synthroid 75 micrograms was not removed from the blister pack. Resident #5 reported that some mornings they did not receive their 5:00 AM Synthroid medication, which was confirmed during an interview on 3/07/2024. Resident #6, who has cerebral palsy, essential hypertension, and osteoarthritis of both hips, did not receive their Aspercreme patch as ordered on 10/27/2022. The resident reported not receiving the patch, and an undated skin assessment confirmed the absence of the patch. The Aspercreme patch count remained unchanged before and after the alleged administration. Resident #6 stated that they usually received their medication but sometimes did not receive the Aspercreme patch during overnight shifts, leading to back pain and feeling shaky.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 22 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Oneonta
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chestnut Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 1 |
| Cooperstown Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing | 14.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Chasehealth Rehab And Residential Care | 16.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Delhi Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 16.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Valley View Manor Nursing Home | 22.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Aurelia Osborn Fox Memorial Hospital.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.