Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Aaron Manor Rehabilitation And Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to assess residents for safe bed rail use, did not review risks and benefits with residents or representatives, and did not obtain informed consent. Six residents were observed with bed rails without proper assessments or care plan documentation. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in understanding and implementing bed rail policies.
The facility did not maintain a clean and homelike environment in the kitchen, as required by policy. An 8-inch hole behind the dish machine, caused by water damage, had been unrepaired for months. Interviews with the Food Service Director and Maintenance Director confirmed the issue's duration and noted fruit flies in the area. Despite having repair quotes and work orders, the problem persisted, violating cleanliness standards.
Two residents experienced medication administration errors, leading to a 7.4% error rate. One resident did not receive a scheduled hydrocodone dose on time, while another had a cream pre-poured and mislabeled. The LPN involved admitted to signing off medications incorrectly, and the DON emphasized the importance of timely and correctly labeled medication administration.
During a survey, it was found that controlled medications in a unit's storage room were not properly secured with a double-lock system as required by facility policy. An LPN admitted to forgetting to lock the exterior cabinet door, and the DON confirmed that all controlled medications should be double-locked at all times.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program. CNAs did not follow enhanced barrier precautions for a resident with a urinary tract infection, and one CNA did not perform hand hygiene between assisting residents. A used insulin syringe was left on a bedside table, and a nasal cannula was reinserted into a resident's nose after falling on the floor. Additionally, catheter tubing was found on the floor, contrary to facility policy. These actions were confirmed as infection control concerns by the Infection Control Nurse and DON.
Deficiency in Bed Rail Assessment and Consent
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were properly assessed for the safe use of bed rails before their installation, did not review the risks and benefits with the residents or their representatives, and did not obtain informed consent. This deficiency was observed in six out of twelve residents reviewed for accidents. The facility's policy required an assessment to determine the necessity of side rails, including a review of the resident's bed mobility and ability to transfer, as well as education on the risks versus benefits. However, these assessments were either outdated or not conducted, and the residents' care plans did not reflect the use of bed rails. Resident #13, who had dementia and required substantial assistance for mobility, was observed with bilateral half bed rails in use, but the last assessment was dated over a year prior, with no updated assessments or evidence of informed consent. Similarly, Resident #128, with severe cognitive impairment and limited mobility, was found with enabler bars in use without any documented assessments or consent. Resident #112, also severely cognitively impaired, had enabler bars in use without any assessments or care plan documentation. Resident #107, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for mobility, was observed with bilateral half bed rails despite a previous assessment indicating that bed rails were not appropriate. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in the understanding and implementation of bed rail assessments and usage. Staff admitted to raising bed rails for care without proper assessments or physician orders, and there was a lack of communication and adherence to the facility's policy regarding bed rail use.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Homelike Kitchen Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the kitchen area, as required by their policy. During a Recertification Survey, it was observed that there was an approximately 8-inch hole through the base of the wall behind the dish machine, which had been in disrepair for a significant period. Interviews with the Food Service Director and the Maintenance Director revealed that the wall damage had been an issue for some time, with water damage contributing to the problem. The Food Service Director noted that the wall had been broken through by water damage for six months, and there were also reports of fruit flies in the area. Despite having quotes and work orders out for repair, the issue remained unresolved, violating the facility's policy to maintain food preparation and service areas in a clean and sanitary condition.
Medication Administration Errors Exceed Acceptable Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent or less, resulting in a rate of 7.4 percent during the recertification survey. This deficiency was identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews involving two residents. For one resident with a history of fractures and dementia, a scheduled dose of hydrocodone was not administered at the correct time, despite being signed off as given. The LPN responsible admitted to possibly signing off the medication as administered by mistake, as they did not see it on the Medication Administration Record. Another resident, who was cognitively intact and had conditions including rosacea and multiple sclerosis, was involved in a separate medication error. A cream intended for this resident was pre-poured and left unlabeled in a medication cart, with the LPN initially identifying it incorrectly. The LPN had signed off the cream as administered but intended to apply it later. The Director of Nursing confirmed that medications should be administered on time and remain in their original packaging until administration, highlighting the errors in the facility's medication administration practices.
Improper Storage of Controlled Medications
Penalty
Summary
During a Recertification Survey conducted from October 17 to October 24, 2024, it was observed that the facility failed to ensure proper storage of controlled medications in the 3-400 Unit medication storage room. Specifically, the controlled medication cabinet, which contained several blister packs of controlled medications, was not secured with the required double-lock system. The exterior door of the cabinet was found unlocked, leaving the medications secured only by the locked interior door. This was contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates that schedule II-controlled medications be stored in a double-locked environment. Interviews conducted during the survey revealed that a Licensed Practical Nurse admitted to forgetting to lock the exterior cabinet door. Additionally, the Director of Nursing confirmed that controlled medications should always be stored in a double-locked cabinet and expressed the expectation that all controlled cabinets in the facility be double-locked at all times. The facility's policies, including the Center Medication Storage Policy and the Controlled Drug Management policy, both emphasize the necessity of double-locking controlled substances to ensure their security.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple observations during the recertification survey. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) did not adhere to enhanced barrier precautions when transferring a resident with a urinary tract infection and other serious conditions. Despite knowing the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions, the CNAs did not wear gowns and one CNA failed to perform hand hygiene between assisting different residents. This lack of compliance with infection control protocols was confirmed during interviews with the CNAs and the Director of Nursing. Additional deficiencies were observed with other residents. A used insulin syringe was found on a resident's bedside table, which should have been disposed of in a sharps container immediately after use. Another resident's nasal cannula, which had fallen on the floor, was reinserted into the resident's nose without being cleaned or replaced, contrary to the facility's policy on oxygen administration. These actions posed significant infection control concerns, as confirmed by the Infection Control Nurse. Furthermore, a resident with an indwelling catheter was found with the catheter tubing lying on the floor, which contained urine, and a yellow liquid resembling urine was observed on the floor beneath it. This was against the facility's catheter care policy, which states that catheter tubing should never touch the floor. The Infection Control Nurse and the Director of Nursing acknowledged these issues as infection control concerns, highlighting the potential for contamination and the spread of infectious diseases.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 155 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fairport
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crest Manor Living And Rehabilitation Center | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Fairport Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| St John's Penfield Homes | 2.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Highlands Living Center | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Penfield Place | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Aaron Manor Rehabilitation And Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.