Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Complete Care At Regent Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain proper food safety and sanitation standards, with expired food items, improper personal hygiene practices, and inadequate labeling and storage of food in unit refrigerators. Temperature control issues were also noted, with a refrigerator operating below the acceptable range without corrective actions documented.
The facility's call bell system failed to provide notifications at the nurse's station due to an unplugged annunciator panel, potentially affecting all residents. The issue was confirmed by the DM, who noted that any call bell activation from the fourth floor would not be detected.
The facility was found deficient in maintaining a clean and homelike environment, with surveyors observing dust accumulation on air vents across multiple floors and in residents' rooms, as well as a broken toilet tissue paper holder. The Director of Maintenance acknowledged the lapse in regular cleaning, and the facility's policy did not specifically address vent cleaning.
The facility failed to verify the credentials of newly hired licensed staff, as five out of eight reviewed staff members lacked documented proof of license verification before their hire date. The NJDOH online Public Registry printouts did not include the verification date, and the Director of Human Resources was unaware of this issue. Despite the facility's process to verify licenses before hiring, they could not provide evidence to support this practice.
The facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care for three residents. A resident's BIPAP mask was not replaced as promised, and staff were unaware of the facility's policy on mask care. Another resident's oxygen tubing was improperly stored, violating infection control protocols. A third resident with a tracheostomy lacked a physician order for inner cannula changes, and the facility's policy did not address this aspect of care.
A resident's call light was found inaccessible, tied to a siderail and dangling towards the floor, during a surveyor's observation. The resident, who required assistance for daily activities, expressed difficulty in reaching the call bell, which was confirmed by the RN. The facility's policy mandates call lights be within reach, which was not followed in this case.
The facility failed to accurately code the MDS for three residents, leading to deficiencies in care management. One resident's MDS did not reflect the use of oxygen and BIPAP, another was incorrectly coded for a diabetic foot ulcer instead of a sacral wound, and a third resident's discharge date was inaccurately recorded. The RN/MDSS acknowledged the errors and modified the MDS assessments accordingly.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two residents, neglecting to include personal preferences and psychiatric care needs. One resident's preference for a late sleep schedule was not documented, while another's psychiatric diagnoses and medication monitoring were omitted from their care plan. These omissions were contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates the inclusion of measurable objectives and problem areas in care plans.
A facility failed to adhere to professional standards by misdiagnosing a resident, leading to unnecessary antipsychotic medication, and improperly administering a delayed-release medication by crushing it. The misdiagnosis was not documented in the resident's records, and the medication administration did not follow the manufacturer's instructions. The facility's DON and VPoCS acknowledged these errors during a survey.
A resident with intact cognition and a preference for reading materials was observed without these materials in their room, contrary to their care plan. The Activities Aide Recreation acknowledged the absence of subscription reading material since November, attributing it to the new Activity Director's lack of access. The facility's policy to support residents' choices was not followed.
A resident with multiple health conditions, including CHF, did not receive care according to physician orders and recommendations. Daily weights, CHF assessments, and lab tests were inconsistently documented, and the facility failed to follow through on a cardiologist's recommendations for a psychiatric evaluation and medication. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and documentation, and facility policies were not adhered to, leading to deficiencies in resident care.
The facility failed to clarify physician's orders for enteral feedings, leading to potential errors in the care of two residents. One resident had duplicate orders for enteral feeding and water flushes, while another had a piston syringe that was not dated and a yankauer tip not properly stored or discarded. The facility's policies did not provide clear guidance, contributing to these deficiencies.
The facility failed to post the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report daily in a visible and accessible location. On two occasions, the report was either outdated or not visible, with the Director of Nursing and Receptionist acknowledging the oversight. The Staffing Coordinator was responsible for posting, but inconsistencies occurred when she was unavailable.
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for two residents. One resident's records lacked a Universal Transfer Form for multiple hospitalizations, while another resident's records showed discrepancies between physician orders and nurse practitioner notes regarding respiratory support. These issues highlight deficiencies in documentation and record-keeping practices.
The facility failed to meet the mandated staffing ratios, resulting in delayed responses to call bells and inadequate incontinence care for residents. A resident reported waiting one to two hours for assistance, while another experienced delays in being put back to bed, leading to a soaked incontinence brief. The staffing coordinator cited callouts and challenges in replacing absent staff as contributing factors.
The facility failed to ensure that TNAs were enrolled in a CNA training program and completed certification as required by CMS and NJDOH. Two non-certified nurse aides were assigned resident care duties without documented training or competency, and the facility lacked a clear policy for hiring and staffing non-certified aides. Missing employee files and job descriptions further complicated verification of staff qualifications.
Deficiencies in Food Safety and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper sanitation and food safety standards, as evidenced by several observations during a survey. In the kitchen, an opened pack of shredded mozzarella cheese was found past its use-by date, indicating a lapse in monitoring and discarding expired food items. Additionally, a dietary staff member was observed with hair not fully restrained by a hairnet while serving food, and another staff member wore a surgical mask improperly, exposing facial hair. These observations highlight a lack of adherence to the facility's policies on food safety and personal hygiene. Further deficiencies were noted in the handling and storage of food items in unit nutrition refrigerators. A nutritional supplement bottle was found without a resident's name, and frozen food items were improperly stored in a refrigerator instead of a freezer. Additionally, a container of blueberries was found without a label, and a refrigerator light fixture was missing, leaving the interior dark. These issues indicate a failure to properly label and store food items, as well as a lack of maintenance and monitoring of equipment. Temperature control issues were also identified, with a refrigerator on the fourth floor operating below the acceptable temperature range. Despite documentation of the issue, no corrective actions were recorded, and maintenance was not promptly notified. This oversight suggests a breakdown in communication and protocol adherence, potentially compromising food safety and quality. The facility's policies on labeling, dating, and temperature monitoring were not consistently followed, contributing to the observed deficiencies.
Call Bell System Malfunction Due to Unplugged Annunciator
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was functioning properly, which had the potential to affect all residents. During an observation, it was found that the call bell system did not provide audible or visual notifications at the nurse's station when tested for a specific room. Further investigation revealed that the call bell annunciator at the nurse's station was unplugged. The Director of Maintenance confirmed that with the annunciator panel unplugged, any activation of the call bell system from any room on the fourth floor would not be heard or seen at the nurse's station.
Facility Fails to Maintain Clean and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment, as evidenced by the accumulation of dust or dirt-like substances on air circulation vent covers across multiple floors and in residents' rooms. During an initial tour, surveyors observed these conditions on the 4th floor nursing unit, as well as on the 2nd and 3rd floors. The Director of Maintenance confirmed that the maintenance department was responsible for cleaning the vents monthly, but acknowledged that the vents were not clean and that the accumulation of material would take a while to build up, indicating a lapse in regular maintenance. Additionally, the surveyor noted a broken toilet tissue paper holder in a resident's room, which was not addressed until after the surveyor's inquiry. The surveyor also observed dusty vents in a resident's toilet and the elevator, which were confirmed by staff to be the result of dust accumulation. The facility's Environment Policy, reviewed in January 2025, did not specifically mention the cleaning of air vents, which may have contributed to the oversight. The policy emphasized maintaining a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment, but the observed conditions did not align with these standards. The facility did not provide further documentation to address these deficiencies during the survey process.
Failure to Verify Staff Credentials Upon Hire
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the credentials of newly hired licensed staff were verified upon hire, as evidenced by the lack of documented proof for five out of eight reviewed staff members. Specifically, the license verification printouts for these staff members did not include the date of verification, and there was no evidence that their licenses were verified before their date of hire. This issue was identified during a review of ten randomly selected newly hired employee files, where it was found that the New Jersey Department of Health online Public Registry license verification printouts lacked the date of verification for Staff Members #1, #4, #5, #6, and #7. The Director of Human Resources was interviewed and stated that the process involved verifying licenses on the NJDOH online Public Registry before the date of hire. However, the printouts did not show the date of verification, and the Director was unaware of this issue. The Vice President of Clinical Services later confirmed that the website did not print the date, and the computer settings needed to be adjusted to include it. Despite the facility's process to verify licenses before hiring, they could not provide documented evidence to support this practice, leading to the identified deficiency.
Deficiencies in Respiratory Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for residents using oxygen, as evidenced by deficiencies in the care of three residents. Resident #23 was observed using a BIPAP machine and nebulizer, with the BIPAP mask stored improperly and not replaced as promised. The Registered Nurse was unaware of the facility's policy regarding the frequency of BIPAP mask changes, and there was no care plan addressing the BIPAP mask care and accountability. The resident's medical records lacked evidence of when and how to care for the BIPAP mask, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's policy. Resident #142 was observed with nasal cannula oxygen tubing not stored in a plastic bag when not in use, contrary to the facility's Oxygen Therapy Policy. The tubing was found laid on the resident's bed and wheelchair seat, which was confirmed by both the Licensed Practical Nurse and the Unit Manager as improper storage. The facility's policy required that oxygen delivery devices be covered in a plastic bag when not in use, highlighting a lapse in infection control practices. Resident #88, who had a tracheostomy, was found to have no physician order indicating the frequency of inner cannula changes or the size of the cannula. The resident's care plan included trach care every shift and as needed, but there was no specific order for inner cannula changes. The Unit Manager confirmed the absence of such an order, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight. The facility's Tracheostomy Care Policy did not address the frequency of inner cannula changes, contributing to the deficiency in care for this resident.
Resident's Call Light Inaccessibility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was readily accessible within reach, which was identified during an observation by a surveyor. The resident, who was alert and verbally responsive, was found resting in bed with the call light tied to the left siderail and dangling towards the floor, making it inaccessible. When asked about the call bell, the resident expressed difficulty in reaching it and mentioned that they sometimes had to shout or wait for staff assistance. The resident's medical record indicated diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, and diabetes mellitus, and a care plan intervention required the call light to be within reach. The surveyor's interview with the RN assigned to the resident confirmed that the resident needed assistance with activities of daily living and could use the call bell for help. The RN acknowledged that the call bell should be within reach and took immediate action to rectify the situation. The facility's Call Lights Policy, updated in January 2025, mandates that call lights be positioned conveniently for use and within the resident's reach, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Three Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for three residents, leading to deficiencies in the management of care. For one resident, the MDS did not reflect the use of oxygen and BIPAP, despite the resident having a physician's order for these treatments due to conditions like sleep apnea and COPD. The Registered Nurse/MDS Supervisor acknowledged the miscoding after reviewing the records and confirmed that the MDS should have been coded to include these treatments. Another resident's MDS was inaccurately coded to indicate the presence of a diabetic foot ulcer, which was not supported by the medical records or treatment orders. Instead, the resident had a sacral wound that was not coded. The RN/MDSS confirmed the error after reviewing the electronic medical record and modified the MDS to reflect the correct wound condition. The third resident's discharge date was incorrectly coded on the MDS. The resident left the facility against medical advice, but the MDS did not reflect the accurate discharge date. The RN/MDSS reviewed the records and confirmed the error, subsequently modifying the MDS to reflect the correct discharge date. The facility staff stated they followed the MDS 3.0 Manual but did not have a separate MDS policy.
Deficiencies in Comprehensive Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for two residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their medical and psychosocial needs. For Resident #8, the surveyor observed that the resident's preferences for sleeping late and waking up late were not documented in the care plan. Despite the resident being cognitively intact and having specific preferences for daily activities, these were not reflected in the care plan, as confirmed by the Activities Aide Recreation and the Certified Nursing Aide. The facility's policy required that such preferences be included in the care plan, but this was not done until after the surveyor's inquiry. For Resident #146, the facility failed to include care plans related to the resident's psychiatric diagnoses and the use of psychotropic medications. The resident had active diagnoses of bipolar disorder and depression and was receiving antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. However, the care plan did not address these psychiatric conditions or the monitoring of side effects from the medications. The Registered Nurse and Unit Manager acknowledged the absence of these critical components in the care plan, which should have been included according to the facility's policy. The facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Policy required that care plans include measurable objectives and timeframes, describe services to maintain the resident's well-being, and incorporate identified problem areas. Despite these requirements, the care plans for both residents did not initially meet these standards, leading to the identified deficiencies. The surveyor's findings were discussed with the facility's leadership, who acknowledged the issues and initiated updates to the care plans after the surveyor's observations.
Failure to Adhere to Professional Standards in Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of clinical practice in two instances. In the first instance, a resident with a history of major depressive disorder and cardiac issues was misdiagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, by an Advance Practice Nurse (APN#1) during a psychiatric follow-up. This diagnosis was not documented in the resident's physician services notes or other relevant records. The misdiagnosis led to the unnecessary prescription of Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication. It was later clarified by another APN (APN#2) that the resident did not have a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and the medication was reduced after the surveyor's inquiry. In the second instance, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered Pantoprazole Sodium Oral Tab Delayed Release 40 mg to a resident by crushing the medication and mixing it with applesauce, contrary to the manufacturer's instructions that the medication should be swallowed whole. The resident's profile indicated that they take medications crushed, but the LPN failed to identify any cautionary labels regarding the Pantoprazole. The facility's policy on administering medications did not provide guidance on the crushing of medications, leading to the improper administration of the delayed-release tablets. These deficiencies were identified during a survey, and the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Vice President of Clinical Services (VPoCS) acknowledged the errors. The facility did not provide additional information to address these issues during the exit conference with the survey team.
Failure to Provide Resident with Preferred Reading Materials
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to carry out activities per a resident's care plan, specifically for a resident who was observed without the reading materials that were deemed very important to them. The resident, who had intact cognition and a preference for reading materials such as books, newspapers, and magazines, was observed on multiple occasions without these materials in their room. The resident's care plan included an intervention to greet the resident daily with a morning activity cart offering a beverage of choice and reading material, which was not being followed. The Activities Aide Recreation (AAR) acknowledged the resident's preferences and the absence of the subscription reading material since November. The AAR attributed this to the new Activity Director's lack of access to the subscription reading material. The facility's Activity Policy mandates an ongoing program to support residents' choices based on their comprehensive assessment and care plan, which was not adhered to in this case. The deficiency was discussed with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, and President of Clinical Services, but no additional information was provided by the facility.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders and Recommendations for Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for a resident with multiple health conditions, including congestive heart failure (CHF). The resident had physician orders for daily weights, CHF assessments every shift, and specific laboratory tests, which were not consistently followed. The resident's medical records showed numerous instances where daily weights were not documented, and the physician was not notified of these omissions. Additionally, the CHF assessments were inconsistent, and several laboratory tests, including comprehensive metabolic panels and magnesium levels, were not conducted as ordered. The resident, who had intact cognition, was admitted with diagnoses such as major depressive disorder, cardiac arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. Despite being followed by a cardiologist, the facility did not adhere to the cardiologist's recommendations, including a psychiatric evaluation and starting a new medication, Mexiletine. The psychiatric evaluation was not scheduled, and the resident was not included on the list of residents to be seen by the psychiatrist, indicating a lack of follow-through on critical medical recommendations. Interviews with facility staff, including a Registered Nurse and the Unit Manager, revealed a lack of awareness and documentation regarding the resident's care orders. The facility's policies on physician orders and laboratory services were not adhered to, as evidenced by the failure to notify the physician of missed lab tests and the lack of documentation for the resident's care. The surveyor's findings were communicated to the facility's leadership, but no additional information was provided to address the deficiencies identified.
Failure to Clarify Enteral Feeding Orders and Equipment Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to clarify physician's orders for enteral feedings, leading to confusion and potential errors in the care of two residents. For one resident, there were multiple orders for enteral feeding and water flushes that were not clarified, resulting in duplicate entries. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) acknowledged the duplicate orders but did not take steps to clarify them, which could lead to inconsistencies in the resident's care. The resident was receiving enteral feedings and water flushes, but the orders were not clear, and the facility's protocol was not followed to ensure accurate documentation and administration. Another resident was observed with a piston syringe that was not dated and a yankauer tip that was not stored properly or discarded after use. The LPN confirmed that the piston syringe should have been dated and the yankauer tip discarded, but this was not done. Additionally, there were duplicate orders for enteral feeding and free water infusion, with different rates of infusion, which were not clarified. This lack of clarity in orders and improper handling of equipment could lead to potential errors in the resident's care. The facility's policies on enteral tube feeding and suction equipment did not provide clear guidance on documentation, storage, or dating of equipment, contributing to the deficiencies observed. The surveyor noted that the facility did not provide additional information to address these issues, indicating a lack of adherence to established protocols and procedures for resident care.
Failure to Post Accurate and Visible Staffing Report
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post the accurate Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report daily in a prominent place that was readily accessible and visible to residents and visitors. On two separate occasions, the surveyor observed that the staffing report was either outdated or not visible. On the first occasion, the report was dated 1/24/25, although the surveyor visited on 1/27/25, and it was obscured by a vase of flowers, making it difficult for residents and visitors to see. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Receptionist acknowledged the oversight, with the Receptionist admitting she forgot to update the report. On another occasion, the surveyor noted that the staffing report was not posted in the facility's lobby or near the elevators, areas where it would be accessible and visible. The DON explained that the Staffing Coordinator (SC) was responsible for posting the report, but when she was unavailable, the task was left to other staff members, leading to inconsistencies. The SC confirmed that she usually posted the report and left instructions for others to do so in her absence. The facility's policy required the report to be posted daily in a clear and readable format in a prominent place, but this was not adhered to, resulting in the deficiency.
Deficient Medical Record-Keeping for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete, available, accurate, and readily accessible medical records for two residents. For the first resident, the surveyor observed that the resident had been hospitalized multiple times due to a heart condition. Upon reviewing the medical records, it was found that there was no Universal Transfer Form (UTF) available for the resident's transfers in 2024. The Director of Nursing (DON) initially could not provide the UTF and later presented a copy with a handwritten date, admitting that no other UTFs could be found. This indicates a lack of proper documentation and record-keeping for the resident's transfers. For the second resident, the surveyor noted the use of a BIPAP machine and a nebulizer. The resident's medical records showed a physician's order for BIPAP use at night, which was documented as administered in the electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR). However, the Progress Notes signed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) indicated the use of CPAP instead of BIPAP, with no documentation supporting the use of CPAP. This discrepancy between the physician's order and the NP's notes highlights a failure to accurately document the resident's treatment. The facility's Medical Records Policy requires that each resident's medical record accurately represents their experiences and includes complete, accurate, and timely documentation. The surveyor's findings revealed that the facility did not adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the missing UTF for the first resident and the inconsistent documentation regarding the second resident's respiratory support. These deficiencies were discussed with the facility's leadership, but no additional information was provided to address the concerns.
Staffing Shortages Lead to Delayed Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey. On the second floor, the resident census was 55, but only 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) were available, resulting in a ratio of 1 CNA for 11 residents, which is below the mandated ratio of 1 CNA to 8 residents. This staffing shortage was confirmed by the Unit Manager and CNA #1, who reported being assigned to care for 11 residents, indicating that staffing levels varied depending on the number of CNAs available. Resident #93 reported that it sometimes took staff one to two hours to respond to call bells, leading to situations where their incontinence device would be full. This resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, required partial moderate assistance with transfer and toileting. The care plan for Resident #93 included interventions to provide frequent visits to anticipate toileting needs, but the staffing shortage hindered timely assistance. Similarly, Resident #89 experienced delays in receiving assistance, reporting that they had to wait longer than usual to be put back in bed, resulting in a soaked incontinence brief. This resident, also cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, was dependent on staff for transfer and toileting. The facility's Staffing Coordinator acknowledged the staffing challenges, citing callouts and difficulties in replacing absent staff. Despite efforts to inservice staff on call bell response, the facility's staffing policy and call light procedures were not effectively implemented, contributing to the deficiency.
Facility Fails to Ensure Proper Training and Certification of Nurse Aides
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Temporary Nurse Aides (TNAs) were enrolled in a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) training program and completed their certification as mandated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). Specifically, the facility did not have documented evidence that TNAs were enrolled in school prior to the deadline and completed their CNA certification by the required date. Additionally, there was no verification that non-certified nurse aides were enrolled and actively taking classes in a state-approved CNA Training Program, nor was there evidence of completion of Module 1 before assigning them independent resident duties. The surveyor's investigation revealed that two non-certified nurse aides, who were previously working as TNAs, were assigned to care for residents without the necessary documentation of their training or competency. The facility's staffing and assignment sheets indicated that these aides were listed as nurse aides, yet there was no evidence that they were working under the supervision of a certified nurse aide. Furthermore, the facility lacked a clear policy or program for the hiring, staffing, and assignments of non-certified nurse aides, contributing to the deficiency. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Human Resources, highlighted a lack of proper documentation and oversight regarding the qualifications and assignments of TNAs and non-certified nurse aides. The facility's transition from a previous company resulted in missing employee files and job descriptions, further complicating the verification of staff qualifications. Despite the DON's efforts to address the issue upon their arrival, the facility continued to utilize TNAs and non-certified nurse aides without ensuring they met the necessary training and certification requirements.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,659 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 24 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hackensack
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Careone At Wellington | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Prospect Heights Llc | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At Maywood | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 0 |
| Alaris Health At The Chateau | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Careone At Teaneck | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Complete Care At Regent Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.