Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Careone At Somerset Valley during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the dish machine was operating below the manufacturer’s 160°F wash temp and that staff were using the wrong test strip to check sanitizer in the 3-compartment sink. The EC, CC, and FSD gave conflicting information about the machine specs and sanitizer testing, and logs showed multiple wash temps below the required level while the sink log continued to document 200 ppm entries.
A facility failed to maintain dignity when two severely cognitively impaired residents were observed in the main dining room wearing hospital-type gowns and incontinent briefs during meals and activities. One resident with Down's Syndrome and dementia was repeatedly seen in a gown despite care plan directions for dressing and hygiene, and staff said the resident lacked clothing or that it was acceptable to sit that way. Another resident with dementia and multiple medical conditions was also allowed to eat breakfast in a hospital gown and brief, with staff stating it was okay and that the resident would be dressed later.
Persistent Urine Odor and Soiled Room Conditions: A room occupied by two residents had a visibly soiled curtain and a strong, lingering urine odor that remained despite incontinence care and a bed change. One resident was fully dependent for care and incontinent of bowel and bladder, while the other had a Foley catheter. The DON, HD, and LNHA later confirmed the odor persisted, with urine embedded in the mattress and the room requiring deep cleaning.
Medication administration errors occurred when an RN signed the eMAR before giving ordered sucralfate and oxycodone to one resident, and an LPN gave prednisone without following the take-with-food instruction for another resident. The LPN also administered metoprolol without a cautionary on the eMAR, and the DON stated the cautionary had been deleted during order entry.
A resident with HIV missed 6 doses of Tivicay because the medication was not available for administration and staff did not timely communicate the issue. The eMAR showed repeated 9 entries, nursing notes did not clearly document administration or the reason for exceptions, and interviews revealed that an LPN and RN did not notify the MD, DON, or ADON as expected. The DON stated the missed doses could cause the resident’s viral load to become detectable.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotropics: A resident with severe cognitive impairment, Down Syndrome, and dementia was receiving multiple psychotropic medications, including antipsychotics, antidepressants, and an anxiolytic. The record did not show informed consent for Abilify and Cymbalta, and the IPCP on file for other psychotropics did not document discussion of benefits, risks, or side effects with the RR. The RN/SN and DON acknowledged the missing IPCPs, and the RR reported receiving incomplete information about the medications.
A resident who was dependent on staff for all ADLs and had severe cognitive impairment was observed with a strong urine odor, a soiled curtain, and white flakes on the scalp, neck, and ear. Staff could not confirm that scheduled showers were provided, and the LNHA stated the resident had not had a shower since admission. The care plan called for assistance with bathing and hygiene, but there was no documentation that a shower or bed bath was completed instead of the scheduled shower.
Incorrect Oxygen Flow Setting: A resident with respiratory-related diagnoses was observed receiving O2 via NC from a concentrator set at 4.5 LPM, despite a physician order for 2 LPM. The RN confirmed the incorrect setting, and the resident’s care plan directed staff to administer oxygen per physician order. No humidification was present during the initial observation, and the facility policy noted humidification is recommended for flows above 4 LPM.
The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff, resulting in delayed incontinence care and unmet resident needs. Residents reported long wait times for assistance, with some left soiled or unable to reach meals and water. The facility did not meet state-mandated staffing ratios, and lacked a system to monitor call bell response times, contributing to the deficiencies.
The facility failed to maintain infection control standards by not cleaning shared glucometers between uses, improperly storing respiratory equipment, and inadequately implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). An LPN used a glucometer without cleaning it, respiratory masks were not stored correctly, and there was a lack of clear signage and PPE availability for residents on EBP. Staff and visitors were not adequately informed about EBP protocols.
A resident was administered Midodrine outside of physician-ordered parameters, with multiple instances of the medication being given despite the resident's systolic blood pressure exceeding the prescribed limit. The facility's staff, including the RN and DON, acknowledged the potential risks of such practice, which contravened the facility's medication administration policy.
Two residents experienced inadequate incontinence care, with one resident left in a saturated brief despite notifying staff, and another resident reporting delays in care during the night shift. Both residents had medical conditions requiring assistance with ADLs, and staff shortages may have contributed to the delays.
A resident in an LTC facility was unable to access their bedside table and call light, leading to unmet needs for water and meal access. Despite activating the call light, the resident reported delayed staff response, with grievances about call bell delays dating back months. Staffing challenges were cited as a contributing factor.
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with surveyors observing three errors out of 30 doses administered by three nurses. An LPN administered Metoprolol Succinate ER and Metformin to residents without food, contrary to physician orders. The LPN acknowledged the error, and a review of facility policies confirmed medications should be given as prescribed.
The facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and expired medications were removed from inventory. A surveyor found a Humalog insulin pen with an expired date and another insulin pen that was opened but not dated. The LPN responsible acknowledged the oversight and stated the insulin should have been removed. Manufacturer guidelines require Humalog insulin to be discarded 28 days after opening.
Dish Machine Temperature and Sanitizer Testing Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that dishwashing equipment functioned in accordance with manufacturer specifications and that the correct measuring device was used to verify sanitizer concentration. During a kitchen tour, surveyors observed the dish machine in use with a wash temperature of 158 degrees Fahrenheit and noted a leak in a water line at the back of the machine that was taped with black tape. The Executive Chef stated a chemical company representative had been contacted for service. Surveyors also observed dietary staff washing pans in the three-compartment sink and testing the sanitizer with a strip that did not match the Multi Quat sanitizer strip posted above the sink. The staff member used the strip for 10 seconds and reported the level as 700, and the Executive Chef confirmed that was the strip being used. When the chemical company representative was interviewed, he stated the dish machine was a single tank machine and the wash should be 150 degrees Fahrenheit, but he did not show the surveyors the temperature plate on the machine and initially indicated there was no other plate. He also confirmed the strip being used for the sanitizer was incorrect and stated that if the wrong strip is used, the concentration cannot be known. The Executive Chef stated the chemical had been switched out about 1.5 months earlier and the facility had not been provided another strip. A review of the dish machine temperature log showed several recorded wash temperatures below 160 degrees Fahrenheit, and the three-compartment sink log documented 200 ppm for breakfast, lunch, and dinner entries. On a later interview, the Food Service Director observed the manufacturer plate on the right side of the dish machine and stated she was unaware of the 160 degree Fahrenheit wash temperature requirement.
Residents Left Undressed in Dining Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain and promote dignity by allowing two cognitively impaired residents to be dressed in hospital-type gowns and incontinent briefs while seated in the main dining room during meals and activities. Resident #11 was observed in the dining room wearing only an incontinent brief and a hospital-type gown, and later was still in hospital-type gowns while sitting with other residents during activities. Resident #29 was observed in the dining room wearing an incontinent brief, a sweatshirt, and a hospital gown while eating breakfast. Resident #11 had diagnoses including Down's Syndrome, depression, and unspecified dementia with other behavior disturbances, and the admission MDS indicated severe cognitive impairment and total dependence on staff for ADLs. The care plan called for assistance with hygiene, grooming, dressing, oral care, and eating as needed, and for maintaining the resident in as clean and dry a dignified state as possible. During the survey, staff confirmed that Resident #11 was dependent on staff for all care and incontinent of bowel and bladder, and the CNA stated the resident was brought to the dining room without appropriate clothing. The DON stated the resident had come from a group home and did not have any clothing, while the LSW later stated the resident had clothing and should not have been sitting in the dining room wearing only a hospital-type gown. Resident #29 had diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, cerebral ischemia, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, and the admission MDS indicated severe cognitive impairment and total dependence on staff for ADLs. The care plan stated the goal was for the resident to be clean, dressed, and well-groomed daily to promote dignity and psychosocial well-being. When interviewed, the resident said their legs were cold. The assigned CNA stated it was acceptable for the resident to eat breakfast in a hospital gown and incontinent brief and that the resident would be showered and dressed afterward. A nurse also stated it was okay because the resident was comfortable that way.
Persistent Urine Odor and Soiled Environment in Resident Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in Room #16, which was occupied by two residents. During observation, the curtain in the room was visibly soiled with a large amount of yellow substance, and there was an offensive, lingering urine odor in the room. A CNA present in the room stated she had just provided incontinence care to one resident, but the urine odor persisted. The surveyor returned to the room later the same day and again found the urine odor to be very strong. One resident was observed in the dining room, and an LPN stated that this resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had a developmental disability, and was fully dependent on staff for all care. The LPN and a CNA then assisted with incontinence care for the other resident, who had an indwelling Foley catheter and whose brief was not soiled, yet the offensive urine odor remained in the room. On subsequent observations and interviews, the urine odor continued to permeate the room even after incontinence care and a bed change were provided. The CNA stated the odor persisted and that the facility was aware. The DON confirmed the odor but could not identify its source and had not checked the mattress initially. The HD later stated that urine had become embedded in the mattress, the mattress could not be saved, and the residents had to be moved to another room to allow deep cleaning of the room. The LNHA also confirmed the urine smell persisted and stated the residents should not have been exposed to that smell.
Medication Administration Errors and Missing Cautionary Instructions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently ensure medications were administered in accordance with orders and manufacturer instructions for two residents. For one resident with gastric ulcers and an as-needed oxycodone order for severe pain, an RN prepared sucralfate 1 gram and oxycodone 5 mg tablets, but the medications were not reflected on the eMAR at the time they were prepared. The RN stated she had previously prepared the medications, was called away, and signed the eMAR before administration. During review, the RN acknowledged she should not have pre-signed the medications as administered. For another resident receiving prednisone for inflammation and metoprolol tartrate for hypertension, an LPN prepared the medications in applesauce and administered them after the resident had already eaten breakfast. The prednisone order included the instruction to take with food, but the LPN stated she missed the cautionary. The metoprolol order had no cautionary reflected on the eMAR, and the LPN stated she believed giving it with applesauce was sufficient. The DON later stated the metoprolol cautionary had been deleted when parameters were added and identified this as a data entry error. The facility policy stated medications are to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders and the MAR is to be initialed after giving each medication and before administering the next one.
Missed HIV Medication Doses Due to Unavailable Tivicay
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Tivicay, an antiretroviral medication used to treat HIV, was available and administered as ordered for a resident with HIV, diabetes, and MRSA carrier/suspected carrier status. The resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 and had a care plan focused on immunosuppressive drug therapy for HIV, but the care plan did not include an intervention for the HIV medication brought from home. The resident’s order was Tivicay 50 mg by mouth daily, initiated on 3/17/26, and the medication was identified as the resident’s own medication. During medication pass observation, the RN stated Tivicay was not in stock that day and had also not been available the day before, and that it was expected later that day. Review of the April eMAR showed repeated entries marked with a 9 from 4/1/26 through 4/7/26, indicating the medication was not available or referring to progress notes, but the notes did not clearly document administration or the reason for the exception on multiple days. The record also showed a one-time late administration order for Tivicay on 4/7/26 at 4:00 PM, and the packing slip later reviewed with the DON showed the medication was received on 4/7/26. Interviews showed breakdowns in communication and follow-up among nursing staff. One LPN stated the 9 on the eMAR meant the medication was not available, that the resident was told a refill was needed, and that the resident said no one could obtain it from the pharmacy; the LPN said he informed the oncoming supervisor but did not notify the MD, ADON, or DON. Another nurse stated she did not speak with the resident, call the family, or inform the ADON or DON, and acknowledged she should have followed up with the resident, called the pharmacy, and informed the MD. The DON stated she was not made aware of the missing medication until the medication pass observation, and stated the 6 missed Tivicay doses could cause the resident’s viral load to become detectable.
Failure to Obtain and Document Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to fully inform the resident representative in advance about the use of psychotropic medications for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and no capacity to consent. Resident #11 had diagnoses including Down Syndrome, dementia, and seizures, and the MDS dated 03/26/26 showed a BIMS score of 3 out of 15. The record also reflected that the resident had no symptoms of psychosis but was receiving antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. The resident’s medication regimen included Aricept, Abilify, Cymbalta, Ativan, Remeron, and two doses of Seroquel. The care plan identified the resident’s difficulty with understanding and communication related to cognitive decline and noted risk for adverse effects related to antidepressant, antianxiety, anxiolytic, and antipsychotic medications, but it did not reflect education and notification of the resident representative. Consultant pharmacist recommendations documented concerns about duplicate antipsychotic therapy, multiple antidepressants, QT prolongation, and increased risks associated with combined antipsychotic use. The medical record did not show documented informed consent for Abilify and Cymbalta before administration. An IPCP dated 03/23/26 was present for Lorazepam, Mirtazapine, and Quetiapine, but it did not reflect that the benefit, risks, and possible side effects were discussed with the resident representative. During interviews, the RN/SN and DON acknowledged that IPCPs for Abilify and Cymbalta were not in the record, and the resident representative stated she had initially been informed of only one to two medications and later received a message about five psychotropic medications.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Document ADL Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required ADL care for a resident who was dependent on staff for all care, including bathing. On the initial tour, the resident was observed in the room with a strong urine odor and a visibly soiled curtain. The resident was nonverbal and unable to communicate with the surveyor. A Licensed Practical Nurse stated the resident was dependent on staff for all care. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including cerebral infarction, acute respiratory failure, and malignant neoplasm of the bone. The MDS dated 03/04/26 indicated severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 3 out of 15, and Section GG showed dependence on staff for all ADLs. The care plan identified an ADL self-care deficit and directed staff to assist with bathing/showering as needed, as well as daily hygiene, grooming, and dressing. Survey review and staff interviews showed the resident was scheduled for showers, but the facility could not confirm that a shower was provided on the scheduled date. The ADON could not verify when the resident last received a shower, and the shower log showed the resident was scheduled for a shower on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift. The LNHA stated the resident had been at the facility since February 2026 and had not had a shower, and there was no documentation that a bed bath was provided instead. The CNA later showed the resident’s scalp, right cervical area, and right ear covered with white flakes and stated the nurse had not yet come to assess. The DON stated the facility was not equipped for a gurney resident without trunk control and said the resident received bed baths on shower days, but the documentation system should have been modified to reflect bed baths instead of showers.
Incorrect Oxygen Flow Setting
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain appropriate oxygen administration for one resident receiving respiratory care. Resident #39, who had diagnoses including surgical aftercare following surgery on the respiratory system, acute respiratory failure, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis, was observed in bed with the head of the bed elevated and receiving oxygen via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator set at 4.5 LPM. No humidification was present during the initial observation, even though the resident had an order for oxygen at 2 LPM. On the following morning, the resident was again observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula with the concentrator still set at 4.5 LPM. The RN confirmed the setting was 4.5 LPM, then reviewed the physician order and stated the resident was ordered oxygen at 2 LPM. The RN acknowledged the concentrator was not set according to the physician order and stated he would contact the Respiratory Therapist and MD. The resident’s care plan directed staff to administer oxygen per physician order, and the facility policy stated humidification is recommended for oxygen flows above 4 LPM and oxygen should be started at 2 to 3 liters per minute unless otherwise ordered.
Staffing Deficiencies Lead to Delayed Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of all residents, resulting in several deficiencies. Observations and interviews revealed that residents did not receive timely incontinence care, with one resident found soiled and left unattended for an extended period. Another resident reported being unable to reach water or their meal tray due to mobility issues and a lack of staff response to call lights. These incidents highlight the facility's inability to maintain adequate staffing levels, as confirmed by staff interviews indicating that CNAs were often responsible for more residents than they could effectively manage. The facility also failed to maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey. The report detailed specific instances where the facility was understaffed, with fewer CNAs and RNs than required on multiple occasions. This staffing shortage was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing, who admitted awareness of the staffing issues but did not provide a plan to address the acuity needs of residents requiring RN care. Additionally, the facility lacked a system to monitor call bell response times, relying instead on resident feedback to identify issues. This lack of oversight contributed to delays in care, as residents reported long wait times for assistance, particularly during night shifts. The facility's staffing coordinator confirmed the challenges in staffing certain shifts, further exacerbating the problem. The facility's failure to adhere to its own policy of answering call lights promptly and providing timely care underscores the systemic issues in staffing and resource allocation.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Equipment Cleaning and EBP Implementation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to acceptable standards of infection control practices, particularly in the cleaning and storage of shared glucometers. During a medication administration, an LPN was observed using a glucometer on a resident without cleaning it before or after use, and then storing it back in the medication cart. This practice was contrary to the manufacturer's specifications, which require the glucometer to be cleaned and disinfected between each patient use. The LPN admitted to not disinfecting the glucometer despite having received education on infection control during orientation. Additionally, the facility did not ensure proper storage of respiratory masks and tubing, which could potentially spread infection. A nebulizer mask was observed placed directly on a nightstand in a resident's room, and a Bipap mask was similarly stored on a bedside table. The facility's policy requires respiratory equipment to be disinfected and stored in a plastic bag after use, but this was not followed. The residents involved had significant medical conditions, including acute pulmonary edema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which necessitated the use of such equipment. The facility also failed to implement a process to identify residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) effectively. There was no clear signage on resident room doors indicating the type of PPE required, and PPE and alcohol-based hand sanitizer were not readily available outside or within the rooms. Staff, residents, and visitors were not adequately informed about the EBP, as evidenced by the lack of understanding of the orange and green dots used as indicators. The ADON/IP acknowledged that the facility's practice did not align with CDC guidelines, which require clear signage and accessible PPE and hand sanitizers.
Improper Administration of Midodrine
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice by administering Midodrine, a medication used to increase blood pressure, outside of the physician's specified parameters for a resident. The physician's order required that Midodrine be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) exceeded 130. However, the Medication Administration Records (MAR) for September and October 2024 revealed multiple instances where the medication was administered despite the resident's SBP being above the prescribed threshold. Specifically, in September, three doses were given when the SBP was 138, 135, and 146, and in October, ten doses were administered with SBP readings ranging from 135 to 152. The deficiency was identified during a surveyor's review of the resident's medical records and interviews with facility staff. The Registered Nurse acknowledged that administering Midodrine outside the physician's parameters could result in dangerously high blood pressure, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the order to hold the medication. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that administering the medication outside the specified parameters could lead to adverse reactions, underscoring the necessity of following the physician's instructions. The facility's policy on administering medications, revised in April 2019, mandates that medications be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, which was not followed in this case.
Inadequate Incontinence Care for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care for two residents, leading to deficiencies in meeting their Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs. Resident #110 was observed by a surveyor to have a saturated incontinence brief, and despite notifying Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, the resident did not receive timely care. CNA #1 informed CNA #2, who was responsible for Resident #110, but the care was still delayed. Resident #110's medical records indicated a need for assistance with ADLs due to physical limitations, including a wedge compression fracture and severe protein caloric malnutrition. Resident #112 also experienced inadequate incontinence care, reporting to the surveyor that they had not been changed since the previous night. The resident's incontinence brief was found saturated with urine and feces. The resident expressed concerns about delays in call light responses, particularly during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift, which exacerbated their discomfort due to a bedsore. The CNA responsible for this shift admitted to managing 22 residents, which may have contributed to the delay in care. Resident #112's medical records included diagnoses of dilated cardiomyopathy and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Deficiency in Resident Accommodation and Call Light Response
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's bedside table and call light were accessible, leading to a deficiency in accommodating the resident's needs. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including dilated cardiomyopathy and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, was observed in bed unable to reach water and a breakfast tray placed on a bedside table in the far corner of the room. The resident reported having diarrhea and dry lips upon admission and stated that they could not get a sip of water all night despite activating the call light. The resident expressed frustration that no staff responded to their call light, and when someone did, they turned off the light and left without addressing the resident's needs. The surveyor's investigation revealed that the breakfast tray was delivered at 8:00 AM, but the resident, who had undergone surgery, was unable to get out of bed to reach it. Interviews with CNAs indicated a lack of familiarity with the resident's routine and challenges in managing the workload, with one CNA responsible for 22 residents during the night shift. The DON acknowledged ongoing issues with call bell response times, which were attributed to staffing challenges, and noted that grievances regarding this issue dated back to July. The facility was aware of the problem and was working on addressing it.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds 5%
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, as observed by surveyors. During the survey, three nurses administered 30 doses of medication to four residents, resulting in three errors and a medication error rate of 7.6%. Specifically, an LPN administered Metoprolol Succinate ER to a resident without ensuring it was taken with food, as required by the physician's orders. The medication was given before the facility's breakfast trays were delivered, and the LPN did not provide, offer, or instruct the resident to take the medication with food. Another incident involved the same LPN administering Metformin and Metoprolol Succinate ER to another resident, again without food, contrary to the physician's orders. The LPN acknowledged administering the medication too early and without food, which was against the prescribed instructions. A review of the facility's Medication Pass Observation and policy on administering medication indicated that medications should be given in accordance with prescriber orders, which was not followed in these instances.
Medication Labeling and Expiration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled and expired medications were removed from active inventory. During an inspection of a medication cart on the sub-acute unit, a surveyor observed a Humalog insulin pen with an expiration date of 10/27/24 and another insulin pen that was opened but not dated. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for the medication cart acknowledged that the Humalog insulin should have been dated upon opening and could not provide a rationale for the expired insulin still being present. Upon further interview, the LPN stated that the insulin was discontinued and should have been removed from the cart. According to manufacturer recommendations, Humalog insulin must be discarded 28 days after opening.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 861 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 14 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bound Brook
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abingdon Care & Rehabilitation Center | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| N J Eastern Star Home | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Accelerate Skilled Nursing And Rehab Piscataway | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Somerset Woods Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| The Arbor At Laurel Circle | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Careone At Somerset Valley.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.