Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Good Samaritan Society - Hastings Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen and properly label and date leftover foods, risking foodborne illnesses for residents. Observations revealed expired and unlabeled food items, and unsanitary conditions in the kitchen. Additionally, meals served to residents in their rooms were not handled properly, with trays left unattended for hours, compromising food safety. Two residents were directly affected by these deficiencies.
The facility, licensed for 175 beds, failed to employ a qualified full-time social worker. The Social Services Director, responsible for all department duties, lacks the necessary qualifications, having only completed a 10-hour online certification for smaller facilities. A resident's POA reported communication issues with the social services department.
A resident did not receive their scheduled weekly bath due to a malfunctioning bath chair and time constraints expressed by the bath aide. The resident, who is cognitively intact, preferred a whirlpool bath, which was not provided on the scheduled date. Staff interviews revealed confusion about bathing responsibilities and unclear documentation practices.
A facility failed to ensure staff wore gowns and gloves during high contact care for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter, as required by Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). During an observed transfer, two nurse aides handled the resident and urinary catheter without protective equipment, despite the resident's care plan indicating the need for EBP. Interviews confirmed the requirement for gown and glove use, and the aides admitted to the lapse due to being rushed.
Sanitation and Food Safety Deficiencies in Kitchen and Room Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen and properly label and date leftover foods, which could potentially lead to foodborne illnesses for all residents consuming meals prepared in the kitchen. Observations revealed several items in the dietary department that were either past their use-by dates or lacked proper labeling. For instance, a container of coleslaw and potato salad were found with expired use-by dates, and several containers in the refrigerator were unmarked, leading to their disposal. Additionally, the kitchen area, including the walk-in freezer, was found to be unsanitary, with food items and debris on the floor. The facility also failed to ensure that meals served to residents in their rooms were handled in a manner that prevented foodborne illness. Resident 34 was observed with a breakfast tray left untouched for several hours, with the resident lying flat in bed, indicating a lack of timely assistance or monitoring. Despite being able to feed themselves, the resident did not consume the meal until much later, raising concerns about the food's safety due to prolonged exposure at room temperature. Similarly, Resident 16, who requires supervision for eating, was left with a meal tray in their room for an extended period without consuming any food. The resident was observed lying on their side, with the meal tray untouched for several hours, indicating a lack of appropriate supervision and timely removal of the meal tray. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the food would not be safe to eat due to the potential for foodborne illness, highlighting the facility's failure to comply with food safety standards.
Facility Lacks Qualified Full-Time Social Worker for 175-Bed Capacity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a qualified full-time social worker despite having a licensed bed count of 175, which exceeds the threshold of 120 beds that necessitates such a position. At the time of the survey, the facility had a census of 37 residents. The Social Services Director (SSD), who is responsible for all duties within the department, lacks the required qualifications for the role. The SSD transitioned from the kitchen and activities department and obtained an online certification as a social services designee, which was a 10-hour program designed for facilities with 120 beds or fewer. The facility's job description for a social worker requires a bachelor's degree in social work, which the SSD does not possess. Additionally, a resident's Power of Attorney expressed concerns about the lack of communication and availability of the social services department, indicating potential gaps in service provision.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bath for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a scheduled weekly bath for Resident 5, as required by their care plan. Resident 5, who is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14/15, reported not receiving a bath during the week of 02/26/2025. The resident was informed that the bath chair was not working, and despite expressing a preference for a shower, the bath aide stated they did not have time to provide one. The resident's care plan indicated a preference for a weekly whirlpool bath, and the records showed that a whirlpool bath was provided on previous dates, but not on 02/26/2025. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and communication regarding the responsibility for resident care and bathing schedules. The scheduling of staff responsible for baths was determined during morning huddles and was not documented. On 02/26/2025, there was confusion among staff about who was responsible for bathing Resident 5, and the charting for that day indicated that the bathing activity did not occur. Staff members were also unclear about the meaning of 'non-applicable' in the charting for the type of bath given, indicating a lack of understanding or training regarding documentation procedures.
Failure to Adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff adhered to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact resident care activities, specifically for Resident 33, who has an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility's policy requires staff to wear gowns and gloves during such activities to prevent the transfer of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs). However, during an observation, Nurse Aide-E and Nurse Aide-B did not wear the required protective equipment while transferring Resident 33, who is dependent on staff for transfers and other personal care activities. Resident 33's care plan, dated 3/3/25, indicated the need for EBP due to the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. Despite this, during a transfer observed on 3/4/25, the nurse aides handled the resident and the urinary catheter without wearing gowns or gloves. This included removing the call light, blanket, and urinary catheter bag, as well as attaching the lift sling and repositioning the resident, all with bare hands. The urinary catheter tubing was noted to contain cloudy urine, suggesting a potential infection risk. Interviews with the nurse aides and the facility's Infection Preventionist confirmed the requirement for gown and glove use during high contact care activities for residents on EBP. The aides acknowledged the lapse, attributing it to being rushed, and confirmed that they normally adhere to the EBP requirements. The Infection Preventionist also confirmed the necessity of wearing protective equipment during such activities and mentioned providing on-the-spot training when non-compliance is observed.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 59 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hastings
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard Rest Haven | 14.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Accura Healthcare Of Kenesaw | 15.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Adept Nursing & Rehab Of Blue Hill | 17.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Eventide Prairie Commons Care Center | 21.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lakeview | 21.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Good Samaritan Society - Hastings Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.