Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Good Samaritan Society - Bloomfield during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Staff did not consistently perform hand hygiene between glove changes during catheter and incontinence care for a resident with multiple medical conditions, and the urinary catheter drainage bag was repeatedly handled and positioned inappropriately. Additionally, the facility did not follow its own COVID-19 protocols, as symptomatic staff were not tested for COVID-19 despite policy requirements.
A resident with complex medical needs requiring total assistance for toileting and transfers experienced significant delays in receiving care, waiting over an hour for help after activating the call light. Facility records showed repeated instances of call lights going unanswered for extended periods, and staffing schedules revealed that CNA coverage often fell below the facility's own requirements, leading to ongoing delays in resident care.
A resident with significant medical needs, who required total staff assistance, reported that a nurse aide removed their call light from reach after a request for help. The incident, along with similar occurrences, was reported to the facility Administrator but was not reported to the State Agency, and no investigation was completed or submitted as required by policy. The DON confirmed the failure to follow reporting and investigation procedures.
A resident with multiple medical conditions and intact cognition required total staff assistance and had clearly communicated preferences for morning and evening routines during a care plan conference attended by their spouse. Despite this, the care plan was not updated to include the resident's preferred times for getting up and going to bed, as confirmed by the DON.
A resident who was fully dependent on staff for toileting and transfers waited over an hour for assistance after repeatedly requesting help, resulting in involuntary fecal incontinence. Staff were aware of the resident's needs but delayed care due to limited staffing and other duties, and the resident's care plan for timely incontinence management was not followed.
The facility did not maintain sufficient NA and housekeeping staff to meet resident needs, resulting in delayed call light responses, missed ADL care such as bathing, and inconsistent room cleaning. Several residents with cognitive and physical impairments experienced prolonged waits for assistance and infrequent bathing, while the only housekeeping staff was often reassigned to NA duties, leaving cleaning tasks incomplete.
A resident with mobility and self-care deficits did not receive timely assistance with ADLs, including inconsistent bathing and delayed call light responses, due to inadequate nurse aide staffing. Both the resident and their family reported ongoing concerns about insufficient staff, and the DON confirmed that posted staffing levels were not being met.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple physical limitations experienced repeated falls without documented implementation or revision of fall prevention interventions. Despite facility policy requiring proactive measures and care plan updates after each fall, no new interventions were documented, and the care plan was not revised following multiple incidents, as confirmed by the DON.
The facility did not provide required clinical documentation when declining to reduce psychotropic medication doses for two residents, despite recommendations from the consultant pharmacist. One resident with dementia and behavioral symptoms continued on Seroquel and Paroxetine without documented rationale for not attempting a dose reduction, and another resident with sleep disturbances remained on Trazadone without clinical justification for not reducing the dose. Nursing staff confirmed the lack of timely response and documentation.
A resident did not receive prescribed Yupelri due to unavailability, and repeatedly refused Novolog insulin and Oxycodone without practitioner notification or alternative treatments being offered, contrary to facility policy. Interviews confirmed the resident and spouse were not provided alternatives, and the DON acknowledged the lapses in medication administration and documentation.
A resident assessed as high risk for falls experienced multiple falls related to toileting, despite care plan interventions such as an anti-roll back device and a scheduled toileting plan. Staff interviews revealed that the routine toileting intervention was not communicated or followed, and the DON confirmed that staff were not completing this fall prevention approach.
A resident with heart failure, heart disease, and mild cognitive impairment was not offered a COVID-19 vaccine booster or provided with education about the vaccine upon admission, despite facility policy requiring such actions. Documentation showed no consent or declination for the vaccine, and the resident was not current on COVID-19 vaccination.
A resident with multiple health conditions developed pressure ulcers that were not consistently assessed or documented according to facility policy. There were significant delays and omissions in wound measurements, incomplete documentation of wound characteristics, and a lack of evidence that recommended nutritional interventions were implemented. The resident's ulcers worsened, showing signs of infection and requiring hospitalization, while staff failed to ensure regular assessments and timely interventions.
The facility failed to implement effective fall prevention interventions for three residents, leading to repeated falls. Despite having orders for alarms, these were often not in place or functioning, and staff did not consistently secure them to the residents. Interviews confirmed that necessary interventions were not implemented to prevent future falls.
The facility failed to document and account for discontinued medications awaiting destruction for four residents, as required by their policy. Medications were found in a locked drawer without proper labeling or documentation, risking potential loss or theft. Interviews confirmed the lack of necessary records for medications like Erythromycin, Moxifloxacin, Naphcon A, Ativan, and Lorazepam.
A facility failed to address repeat grievances and ensure sustainable resolutions for a resident's care and activities. The resident's family reported issues such as incomplete oral care, an unplugged fall alarm, and inadequate toileting. Despite initial resolutions, these concerns persisted, and the resident did not consistently receive 1:1 activities as per their care plan. Interviews confirmed ongoing issues with care provision, highlighting a continued deficiency.
A facility failed to notify a resident's family about significant changes in the resident's condition, including weight loss and nutritional interventions. The resident, with severe cognitive impairment, experienced a substantial weight loss, and although the PCP was informed, the family was not. Additional communication failures included not informing the family about diet changes, initiation of Arginaid, and changes in the use of Magic Cup. Interviews confirmed these lapses, indicating a breach of the facility's notification policy.
Infection Control Failures in Hand Hygiene, Catheter Care, and COVID-19 Protocols
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to perform hand hygiene at appropriate intervals during the provision of care, specifically when removing soiled gloves and before donning clean gloves. Observations showed that nurse aides did not complete hand hygiene before putting on personal protective equipment or after removing gloves during catheter care and incontinence care for a resident. The urinary catheter drainage bag was repeatedly placed on bed linens and positioned above the level of the resident's bladder and head during transfers, contrary to facility policy and best practices for infection prevention. The resident involved had multiple medical conditions, including heart failure, previous stroke with paralysis, sepsis, obstructive uropathy, anxiety, depression, and diabetes. The resident required total staff assistance for hygiene and had an indwelling urinary catheter. During care, the catheter drainage bag was handled inappropriately, including being placed on the bed and attached to the lift above the resident's bladder, and staff did not consistently perform hand hygiene between glove changes while managing incontinence and catheter care. Additionally, the facility failed to follow its COVID-19 protocols. The DON was observed with respiratory symptoms but had not completed a COVID-19 test and stated there was no intention to do so. It was confirmed by a registered nurse that the facility did not test staff or residents presenting with respiratory symptoms or increased temperature, despite facility policy requiring symptomatic employees to be restricted from work until COVID-19 infection was ruled out by testing.
Failure to Provide Sufficient Nursing Staff and Timely Call Light Response
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of all residents, specifically resulting in delayed toileting and incontinence care for a resident with significant medical needs. The resident, who had diagnoses including heart failure, previous stroke with paralysis, sepsis, obstructive uropathy, anxiety, depression, and diabetes, required total staff assistance for toileting, hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bowel with an indwelling urinary catheter. On the observed morning, the resident activated the call light at 7:15 AM for assistance to use the commode, but did not receive help until 8:39 AM, resulting in an involuntary bowel movement due to the prolonged wait. Interviews confirmed that only two direct care staff were working that shift for a census of 30, and the resident was often left waiting for extended periods due to insufficient staffing. Review of the facility's Device Activity Report and call light activity logs revealed numerous instances where call light response times exceeded the facility's policy of a 15-minute response, with some calls going unanswered for up to 138 minutes. These delays were not isolated to a single day but occurred repeatedly over a two-week period, affecting multiple residents. The facility's own policy required prompt response to call lights, and staff interviews confirmed that the expectation was to answer within 15 minutes, which was not consistently met. Further review of staffing schedules showed that the facility frequently scheduled fewer CNAs than required, particularly on weekends and overnight shifts. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the number of CNAs scheduled often did not meet the facility's own standards for adequate staffing. This chronic understaffing directly contributed to the inability to provide timely care and respond to residents' needs as required by both facility policy and regulatory standards.
Failure to Report and Investigate Alleged Staff-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the State Agency, did not complete an investigation, and did not submit the investigation within the required 5 working days. According to the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, all alleged or suspected violations, including abuse, neglect, or injuries of unknown origin, were to be reported immediately to the Administrator and to the State Survey and Certification Agency within 5 working days. However, a review of facility records and interviews revealed that an incident involving a resident's call light being removed from their reach by a nurse aide was reported to the Administrator but was not reported to the State Agency, and no investigation was completed or submitted as required. The resident involved had multiple medical conditions, including heart failure, previous stroke with paralysis, sepsis, obstructive uropathy, anxiety, depression, and diabetes, and required total staff assistance for most activities of daily living. The resident and their spouse reported that it was common for staff to remove the call light from the resident's reach, and specifically recounted an incident where a nurse aide removed the call light after the resident requested assistance. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not report the allegation or complete and submit the required investigation to the State Agency.
Care Plan Not Updated to Reflect Resident's Routine Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update a resident's comprehensive care plan to reflect the individual's stated preferences for morning and evening routines. The resident, who had diagnoses including heart failure, previous stroke with right side paralysis, sepsis, obstructive uropathy, anxiety, depression, and diabetes, was assessed as having intact cognition but required total staff assistance for activities of daily living such as toileting, dressing, hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. The resident was also frequently incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling urinary catheter. During a care plan conference attended by the resident and spouse, the preference for being up and out of bed at 7:00 AM and going to bed at 8:30 PM was clearly communicated. However, a review of the care plan, last revised after this conference, showed no documentation of these preferences. The care plan only included interventions related to positioning and transfer assistance, without addressing the resident's specific requests for daily routine times. The DON confirmed in an interview that the care plan had not been updated to include these preferences.
Failure to Provide Timely Toileting Assistance for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident who required total staff assistance for activities of daily living, including toileting, was not provided timely assistance. The resident, who had a history of heart failure, stroke with paralysis, sepsis, obstructive uropathy, anxiety, depression, and diabetes, was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The care plan specified that the resident should be checked and changed every two hours when in bed and required two staff members and a full lift for transfers. On the morning in question, the resident activated the call light at 7:15 AM after completing a nebulizer treatment, indicating a need to use the commode for a bowel movement. Although a medication aide entered the room, the resident was not assisted with toileting at that time. The call light was activated multiple times, and staff were aware of the resident's request. Despite repeated requests and activation of the call light, the resident waited a total of 1 hour and 24 minutes before two nurse aides arrived to assist with transfer to the commode. During this time, the resident became incontinent of feces. Staff interviews confirmed that only two direct care staff were working that morning, and the resident was left waiting while staff assisted other residents. The resident's care plan interventions for timely toileting and incontinence management were not followed, resulting in the resident remaining soiled until staff were available to provide assistance.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nursing and Housekeeping Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to meet the needs of its residents, as evidenced by multiple documented instances of insufficient nurse aide (NA) coverage and delayed response times to call lights. Review of staffing records showed that, over a period of several weeks, the facility did not meet its own predetermined NA staffing levels for its census, with some days having as few as two NAs on the floor during the day shift. This staffing shortage was confirmed by both staff interviews and the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the facility had not met required NA staffing levels as the census increased from 27 to 35 residents. Residents with significant care needs, including those with cognitive impairments, limited mobility, and self-care deficits, experienced delays in receiving assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bathing, toileting, and hygiene. Documentation revealed that one resident, who required assistance with ambulation and bathing, did not receive baths at the frequency specified in their care plan, with gaps of up to 14 days between baths. Multiple residents had call light response times that exceeded the facility's standard of 10 minutes, with some instances of call lights going unanswered for up to 53 minutes. These delays were noted repeatedly for several residents, particularly during periods of low staffing. In addition to nursing staff shortages, the facility also failed to maintain daily cleaning of resident rooms as required. The only housekeeping staff member was frequently reassigned to work as a NA, resulting in missed cleaning duties. Interviews with environmental services and maintenance staff confirmed that there was no clear schedule or record of which rooms were cleaned during certain periods, and that maintenance and laundry staff were sometimes tasked with cleaning in the absence of dedicated housekeeping personnel. These combined staffing and housekeeping deficiencies had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
Failure to Provide Timely ADL Assistance Due to Inadequate Staffing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) to a resident who required help due to self-care deficits, limited mobility, and a history of dizziness and arthritis. The resident's care plan specified the need for assistance with ambulation, bathing, toileting hygiene, transferring, and clothing adjustment, with a preference for bathing twice weekly during the summer. However, records showed inconsistent bathing schedules, with gaps of up to two weeks between baths, and multiple instances where call light response times exceeded the facility's stated standard of 10 minutes, including one instance where the response time was over 50 minutes. Interviews with the resident and their family member revealed ongoing concerns about insufficient staffing, particularly during day and evening shifts and on weekends, leading to delays in care and unmet personal hygiene needs. The resident reported feeling unsafe when forced to attempt self-care due to long wait times and expressed dissatisfaction with the frequency of bathing and call light responses. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility was not meeting its own nurse aide staffing levels as posted, which contributed to the deficiencies in providing timely and adequate ADL assistance.
Failure to Implement and Update Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review, revise, and implement care plan interventions to prevent falls for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, limited range of motion on one side, and dependence on staff for ambulation, transfers, and toileting. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression, and experienced several falls over a one-month period. Despite the facility's policy requiring proactive fall prevention, post-fall assessment, and care plan updates, there was no documentation that interventions were put in place after each fall. Record reviews showed that after each fall, there was no evidence of new or revised interventions to prevent future incidents, and the resident's care plan was not updated accordingly. The DON confirmed that interventions to prevent future falls were not implemented following each event, and the care plan should have been updated as per facility policy. This deficiency was identified through record review and staff interview.
Failure to Document Clinical Rationale for Not Reducing Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document a clinical rationale for not completing Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) for psychotropic medications for two residents. Facility policy required that residents on psychotropic medications receive GDRs unless clinically contraindicated, and that any contraindication be documented. For one resident with dementia, anxiety, depression, and behavioral symptoms related to psychosis, the consultant pharmacist requested a dosage reduction for Seroquel and Paroxetine. The provider responded to the request after 45 days but did not document any clinical reason for not reducing the doses. For another resident with sleep disturbances and insomnia, the consultant pharmacist recommended a dosage reduction for Trazadone. The provider declined the reduction but again failed to document a clinical rationale. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the facility did not address pharmacist recommendations for GDRs in a timely manner and did not provide required documentation when declining to reduce psychotropic medication doses. The facility's policies outlined the need for regular review and documentation regarding psychotropic medication use, but these procedures were not followed for the two residents identified in the report.
Failure to Follow Practitioner Orders and Notify of Medication Unavailability or Refusals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow practitioner orders and its own medication administration policy for a resident with multiple chronic conditions. The resident did not receive Yupelri Inhalation Solution for 18 days due to unavailability, and there was no documentation that the practitioner was notified or that an alternative treatment was provided. Additionally, the resident refused multiple doses of Novolog insulin and Oxycodone over several days, but there was no evidence that the practitioner was informed of these repeated refusals or that alternative treatments were considered, as required by facility policy. Interviews with the resident and spouse confirmed that the resident was not offered alternative options when medications were unavailable or refused. The resident had a history of only using sliding scale insulin at home and refused Oxycodone in the morning due to side effects impacting participation in therapy and social visits. The DON confirmed that the resident did not receive the prescribed medications as ordered and that the necessary notifications and documentation were not completed.
Failure to Implement and Monitor Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and monitor fall prevention interventions as outlined in the care plan for a resident identified as high risk for falls. Despite documented falls and a care plan that included specific interventions such as the use of an anti-roll back device on the wheelchair and a routine toileting schedule, staff interviews revealed that these interventions were not consistently communicated or followed. Nurse aides were unaware of the routine toileting plan, and the resident continued to toilet independently without the scheduled assistance intended to reduce fall risk. The care plan had been updated to address the resident's needs after each fall, but the interventions were not effectively put into practice or monitored by staff. The resident had a history of weakness, difficulty walking, and was assessed as high risk for falls on multiple occasions. Event documentation showed the resident experienced falls while attempting to use the bathroom independently, including one incident where an unlocked wheelchair brake contributed to the fall. Although the care plan was revised to address these risks, including scheduled toileting and equipment adjustments, staff interviews and the DON's confirmation indicated a lack of awareness and implementation of these interventions, resulting in continued risk for the resident.
Failure to Offer and Document COVID-19 Vaccine Education and Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was offered the COVID-19 vaccine or provided with education on the benefits and risks of the vaccine, as required by facility policy. The policy specified that residents should be given the opportunity to receive immunizations, have their immunization status reviewed upon admission and on an ongoing basis, and receive documented education about the vaccines for which they are eligible. Documentation should include written consent or declination, and administration or referral for vaccination. In this case, the resident was admitted with a history of heart failure, heart disease, and mild cognitive impairment, and was being treated for an upper respiratory infection. Review of the resident's records showed that the most recent COVID-19 booster was received several months prior to admission, and there was no documentation of consent or declination for a new COVID-19 vaccine. The Infection Preventionist confirmed that the resident was not offered a COVID-19 vaccine booster at admission or since, resulting in the resident not being current on COVID-19 vaccination.
Failure to Monitor and Document Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly evaluate, monitor, and document pressure ulcers for a resident who was at risk for skin breakdown. Upon admission, the resident was assessed as being at risk for pressure ulcer development but had no existing ulcers. The resident was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living and had multiple diagnoses, including hip fracture, diabetes, and end stage renal disease. Despite the facility's policy requiring systematic assessment and documentation, the resident developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the right heel, which was not consistently measured or assessed as required. There were significant gaps in documentation, with weeks passing between wound measurements and incomplete assessments of wound characteristics. The resident subsequently developed a pressure ulcer on the left heel, but treatment for this new ulcer was delayed. The documentation continued to lack regular measurements and comprehensive assessments, making it difficult to determine whether the wounds were healing or deteriorating. The right heel ulcer progressed to a stage 3 ulcer with signs of infection, including increased drainage, foul odor, and a larger wound area. Despite the worsening condition, there were still missing measurements and incomplete documentation of the wound's status. Additionally, a dietary recommendation for a nutritional supplement to aid in wound healing was made, but there was no evidence in the medical record that this intervention was implemented. The resident's condition continued to decline, requiring multiple changes in wound care orders and eventually leading to hospitalization for further evaluation. Throughout the course of care, the facility staff failed to ensure weekly assessments, proper documentation, and timely interventions as outlined in their own policies, resulting in the development and worsening of pressure ulcers.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify causal factors and revise or develop fall interventions to prevent ongoing falls for three residents, leading to repeated incidents. Resident 6, who was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with daily activities, experienced multiple falls without long-term interventions being implemented. Despite having an order for a pull tab alarm, observations revealed that the alarm was often not in place or functioning, and staff failed to secure it to the resident. Interviews with staff confirmed that the necessary interventions were not consistently implemented to prevent future falls. Resident 25, who had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with daily activities, also experienced multiple falls without long-term interventions being implemented. The resident had a personal alarm to alert staff of ambulation attempts, but incident reports indicated that no additional interventions were identified to prevent ongoing falls. Interviews with the Director of Nursing confirmed that interventions were not implemented to prevent future falls for this resident. Resident 79, who had a history of a hip fracture and required substantial assistance with daily activities, experienced several falls without causal factors being identified or interventions being revised. Despite having a pull tab alarm and a silent fall alarm, incident reports revealed that these alarms were not always in place or functioning. Interviews confirmed that no investigations were conducted to determine why the alarms malfunctioned, and no new interventions were developed to prevent further falls.
Failure to Document Discontinued Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper accounting and documentation for medications that were discontinued and awaiting destruction for four residents. The facility's policy on medication disposition, revised on 8/1/23, required that discontinued medications be immediately removed from the resident's supply, stored securely, and documented with specific details before being returned to the pharmacy or destroyed. However, during an observation of the medication storage room, it was found that a locked cabinet drawer contained five medications without any labeling or documentation, indicating a lack of compliance with the policy. Interviews with LPN-H and RN Consultant-P confirmed that the medications were awaiting destruction but lacked the necessary documentation. The medications involved included Erythromycin ophthalmic ointment and Moxifloxacin solution for Resident 6, Naphcon A ophthalmic drops for Resident 8, Ativan for Resident 17, and Lorazepam for Resident 83. The absence of documentation for these medications put them at risk of potential loss or theft, as there was no record of the residents' names, medication details, or quantities, which was required by the facility's policy.
Failure to Address Repeat Grievances and Ensure Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address repeat grievances and ensure sustainable resolutions for concerns related to the care and activities provided to Resident 21. The grievances documented by the resident's family included issues such as incomplete oral care, lack of use of towels and washcloths, an unplugged fall alarm, and inadequate toileting before breakfast. Despite initial resolutions, these concerns persisted, indicating a lack of effective follow-up and resolution. Further grievances were raised by the family regarding insufficient assistance with meals, which was particularly concerning given the resident's weight loss. The family also reported finding a room tray from the previous evening left uncovered, suggesting neglect in meal assistance. Additionally, the resident's care plan included 1:1 activities, which were not consistently provided, as documented in the facility's records. Interviews with the resident's family and facility staff confirmed ongoing issues with the provision of care, including assistance with food and fluids, toileting, oral care, and repositioning. Despite previous staff education and counseling, there was no evidence of additional 1:1 activities being provided, highlighting a continued deficiency in addressing the family's concerns and ensuring the resident's care needs were met.
Failure to Notify Family of Resident's Condition Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the family or responsible party of Resident 21 about significant changes in the resident's condition, specifically regarding weight loss and the initiation of nutritional interventions. The resident, who had diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease, and depression, experienced a substantial weight loss of 14 pounds over two months. Despite notifying the resident's primary care physician about the weight loss and starting a nutritional supplement called Magic Cup, there was no evidence that the family or responsible party was informed of these changes. Further review of Resident 21's medical records revealed additional failures in communication. The family or responsible party was not notified about a change in the resident's diet to soft, bite-sized food, the initiation of Arginaid for wound healing, the discontinuation of Magic Cup due to supplier issues, or its subsequent reintroduction. Interviews with the resident's family and the Director of Nursing confirmed these lapses in communication, highlighting the facility's failure to adhere to its policy of notifying family members of significant changes in a resident's condition.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 49 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bloomfield
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avera Creighton Care Centre | 16.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Plainview Manor | 18.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Accura Healthcare Of Hartington | 19.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Alpine Village Retirement Center | 19.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Colonial Manor Of Randolph | 21.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Good Samaritan Society - Bloomfield.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.