Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Minot Health And Rehab, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents did not receive care that maintained their dignity during grooming and personal hygiene. One resident had noticeable facial hair and reported preferring to be shaved with an electric razor, but stated that only a straight razor was available, despite facility policy and administrative statements that grooming should follow resident preference and that shaving materials are provided. Another resident was transferred to bed by a nurse and a CNA, given perineal care, and placed in a clean brief, but staff left the resident’s pants down and simply covered the resident with a blanket, contrary to administrative expectations that pants be pulled up or removed in bed according to resident preference.
A resident with Parkinson’s disease, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and gait/mobility abnormalities had a care plan requiring a stand-pivot transfer with two staff and a gait belt. During an observed toileting transfer, two CNAs assisted the resident, who showed visible shakiness and an unsteady gait, but one CNA placed her hands around the resident’s ribcage to move the resident back to the wheelchair instead of using a gait belt as required. The CNA later acknowledged not using a gait belt, and administrative staff confirmed their expectation that gait belts be used during transfers per the care plan.
Staff failed to follow infection prevention and control policies when handling reusable equipment and soiled linens for two residents, including one on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). A CNA removed a full body mechanical lift from a resident’s room without disinfecting it, despite facility expectations for cleaning after each use. In a separate incident, CNAs entered the room of a resident on EBP wearing only gloves initially, and one CNA placed soiled linens on the floor instead of directly into a bag, even after donning a gown. An RN later confirmed that staff were expected to disinfect lifts after every use, avoid placing soiled linen on the floor, and wear gowns upon entering EBP rooms.
A resident with severe expressive aphasia and anxiety disorder, dependent on staff for toileting, was left on a bedside commode for approximately six hours without the call light within reach or regular checks by CNAs. This resulted in skin discoloration to the buttocks and a wrist bruise from attempting to get help, as the care plan requiring call light placement and monitoring was not followed.
A resident with severe expressive aphasia and dependent on staff for toileting was left on a bedside commode for an extended period, resulting in skin redness and a bruise from attempting to get help. The incident, which met the facility's criteria for reporting suspected neglect, was not reported to the State Survey Agency as required by policy.
Multiple failures were observed in maintaining a safe, clean, and homelike environment, including non-functioning lights, soiled privacy curtains, visible dust and debris, torn wallpaper, and makeshift repairs with tape. Staff interviews confirmed that cleaning and maintenance procedures were not consistently followed, and required reporting of maintenance issues was not always completed.
The facility did not provide required written transfer and bed-hold notices, including reserve bed payment information, to several residents or their representatives during hospital transfers, and failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman as required. Documentation reviews and staff interviews confirmed these omissions.
Surveyors found that the facility did not accurately code the MDS for several residents, including failing to document serious mental illness, hospice care, depression diagnosis, correct discharge location, and wound dressing treatments, despite supporting medical records and physician orders.
Facility staff did not transcribe a physician's order for multiple blood tests into the electronic medical record and did not ensure the collection of the required blood specimens for a resident. Administrative staff confirmed the omission, and there was no documentation that the laboratory tests were completed.
A resident dependent on staff for bathing did not consistently receive scheduled baths, as evidenced by unclean fingernails and incomplete documentation of bathing assistance. Family concerns and staff interviews confirmed lapses in both care provision and record-keeping.
Two residents receiving hospice services did not have the required hospice election forms in their medical records, despite documentation of hospice enrollment and admission. Facility policy and the hospice contract both require these forms to be obtained and maintained, but an administrative nurse confirmed their absence.
A staff member at the facility took inappropriate images and videos of residents, leading to a failure to protect them from sexual and mental abuse. This affected multiple residents, some with cognitive impairments. The facility's policies on abuse and social media use were not effectively enforced, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy situation.
A resident with severely impaired cognition due to dementia and Parkinson's disease experienced non-consensual sexual contact from another cognitively intact resident. The incident was observed by a staff member, who reported that the affected resident appeared distressed and attempted to swat the other resident away. The facility's policy on abuse, neglect, and exploitation was not effectively implemented to prevent this incident.
A resident developed a stage IV pressure ulcer with exposed hardware due to the facility's failure to evaluate risk factors and implement necessary interventions. The resident, admitted post-surgery for a broken ankle, did not receive proper wound assessment and monitoring, leading to the ulcer's progression. Staff failed to document changes in the wound status and did not complete required assessments.
The facility failed to accurately code the MDS for several residents, affecting the accuracy of assessments and care plans. A resident with Bipolar II Disorder was not correctly coded in the PASRR section, while another resident's medication coding inaccurately reflected insulin use. Additionally, a resident's diuretic use was not recorded. These errors were confirmed by staff interviews.
The facility did not follow professional standards for insulin administration for two residents. A nurse failed to keep the needle in the skin for the required time after administering insulin, and another nurse did not prime an insulin pen according to policy. These actions could lead to inaccurate dosing.
A facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of insulin pens during medication administration for a resident. A nurse prepared insulin and removed a plastic bag labeled with the resident's name from the medication cart, containing NovoLog and Tresiba insulin pens. The NovoLog pen lacked a medication label with the resident's name and administration instructions, and the Tresiba pen lacked an open date. This was against the facility's policy, which requires documenting the open date on the pen body and verifying that the medication label matches the MAR. An administrative nurse confirmed the expectation for staff to follow this policy.
A facility failed to notify a resident's representative of care conferences and did not inform a physician about another resident's high blood sugar levels. The facility's policy requires notifying representatives and physicians of significant changes, but records showed no evidence of such notifications. Interviews confirmed these communication failures, which could prevent appropriate care planning.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Grooming and Personal Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promote and maintain resident dignity for two residents who required assistance with personal hygiene and care. Facility policy on promoting/maintaining resident dignity stated that residents should be groomed and dressed according to their preferences, and the grooming policy specified assisting residents with facial hair care to maintain proper hygiene. During observation, one resident was noted to have noticeable facial hair and, in an interview, stated a preference to have facial hair shaved with an electric razor; the resident reported that the facility only had a straight razor available. An administrative staff member stated that all residents are shaved per their preferences and that shaving materials are provided, which conflicted with the resident’s report. In a separate observation, a nurse and a CNA transferred another resident from a wheelchair to a bed, completed perineal care, applied a clean brief, and then covered the resident with a blanket without pulling up the resident’s pants. Later, an administrative staff member stated that she expected staff to either pull up or remove residents’ pants in bed according to resident preference, indicating that the observed practice did not align with facility expectations or policies regarding resident dignity and grooming.
Failure to Use Gait Belt During Stand-Pivot Transfer
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to the facility’s failure to follow its Safe Resident Handling/Transfers policy and the resident’s care plan requiring use of a gait belt during transfers. The facility policy stated that residents are to be handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risk for injury and that lifting and transferring will be performed according to the resident’s individual plan of care. Resident #2’s medical record showed diagnoses of Parkinson’s disease, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The resident’s current care plan specified a stand-pivot transfer with two staff assisting and the use of a gait belt. During an observation, two CNAs wheeled Resident #2 to the toilet, where the resident used grab bars to transfer from the wheelchair to the toilet, exhibiting visible shakiness and an unsteady gait. After toileting, one CNA cued the resident to stand, applied a clean brief and pants, then placed her hands around the resident’s ribcage to assist the resident back to the wheelchair instead of using a gait belt as required by the care plan. The CNA later confirmed in an interview that a gait belt was not used during toileting care. In a separate interview, three administrative staff members stated they expected staff to utilize a gait belt during transfers as care planned.
Failure to Follow Infection Control Practices for Equipment Cleaning and EBP
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that staff did not follow the facility’s infection prevention and control policies related to cleaning reusable equipment, handling soiled linen, and implementing enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The facility’s policies required that reusable equipment be cleaned and disinfected according to current procedures and manufacturer’s instructions after each resident use, and that EBP involve targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. During observation, a CNA removed a full body mechanical lift from a resident’s room and failed to disinfect it, while stating that lifts and wheelchairs were cleaned by the night shift, contrary to the facility’s expectation that the lift be disinfected after every use. Surveyors also observed failures in infection control practices for a resident on EBP. Two CNAs entered the resident’s room and initially only applied gloves. One CNA placed soiled linen from the floor into a bag, and after being instructed by a nurse to apply PPE, the CNA then donned a gown but removed soiled linen from the bed and again placed it on the floor. The nurse stated that soiled linens should be placed directly into a bag and not on the floor. An administrative staff member later confirmed that staff were expected to disinfect full body mechanical lifts after every use, avoid placing soiled linen on the floor, and wear gowns when entering rooms requiring EBP precautions.
Failure to Follow Care Plan for Toileting and Call Light Placement
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to follow the care plan for a resident with severe expressive aphasia and anxiety disorder, who was dependent on staff for toileting. The care plan specifically required that the call light be secured to the bedside commode and within reach when the resident was toileting. On the evening in question, two certified nurse aides transferred the resident to the bedside commode but did not place the call light within reach and did not check on the resident for approximately six hours. As a result of these actions, the resident was found on the commode after an extended period, with blanchable redness to both buttocks, a light purple area on the right buttock, and a bruise on the left wrist, which was attributed to the resident banging on the wall for assistance. The resident, who was unable to verbalize needs due to aphasia, was left without a means to call for help and was not monitored as required by the care plan.
Failure to Report Suspected Neglect Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an incident of neglect to the State Survey Agency as required by its own policy and federal regulations. A resident with a history of anxiety disorder and severe expressive aphasia, who was dependent on staff for toileting, was found left on a bedside commode for an extended period of time. The care plan for this resident specified the need to ensure the call light was secured and within reach during toileting due to impaired communication. A progress note documented that the resident was found with blanchable redness to both buttocks, a light purple area on the right buttock, and a bruise on the left wrist, which was attributed to the resident banging on the wall for assistance. The resident denied pain and showed no signs or symptoms of pain at the time of assessment. Despite these findings, the facility did not report the incident to the State Survey Agency as required by their policy, which mandates immediate reporting of all alleged violations of abuse or neglect. An administrative nurse confirmed during an interview that the incident was not reported. The failure to report this incident constitutes a deficiency in the facility's compliance with abuse and neglect reporting requirements.
Failure to Maintain Safe, Clean, and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple failures by the facility to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents. Observations revealed issues in several resident rooms, including a non-functioning bathroom light that had been out for about two weeks despite being reported to staff, visible dust and debris on ceiling vents, soiled wallpaper, torn wallpaper, and missing or broken equipment such as a thermostat and a ceiling light cover. Some rooms had makeshift repairs, such as masking or painter's tape with dried paint on doors and window screens with holes patched by residents themselves. In one case, a privacy curtain was visibly soiled with what a resident identified as blood, and the curtain had not been cleaned or replaced as required by facility policy. Interviews with staff confirmed that cleaning and maintenance procedures were not consistently followed. The housekeeping supervisor acknowledged that privacy curtains are supposed to be cleaned weekly and when visibly soiled, but confirmed that a soiled curtain remained in place. Administrative staff admitted that painter's tape was not removed in a timely manner and that maintenance concerns, such as missing light covers and non-functioning lights, were not reported as expected. The facility's own policies and housekeeping checklists require regular cleaning, spot-cleaning of walls, and prompt attention to visible dirt or damage, but these standards were not met in the sampled rooms and storage areas.
Failure to Provide Required Transfer, Bed-Hold, and Ombudsman Notifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required written notifications and documentation related to resident transfers and bed-hold policies for multiple residents who were hospitalized. Specifically, for four sampled residents and one closed record, the facility did not provide the residents or their representatives with written notices of transfer or bed-hold, nor did they notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman as required. In several cases, the bed-hold notices that were provided lacked the required information about the reserve bed payment amount, and transfer notices did not show evidence of Ombudsman notification. These deficiencies were identified through record reviews, policy reviews, and staff interviews. The review of facility policies confirmed that written information regarding bed-hold practices and transfer notifications, including the reserve bed payment policy and Ombudsman notification, should be provided at the time of transfer for hospitalization. However, documentation for the sampled residents showed missing or incomplete notices for hospitalizations, with some records lacking any notice and others missing specific required details. An administrative nurse confirmed during interviews that the required documentation was not present in the records reviewed.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for several residents, as identified through record review, reference to the RAI User's Manual, and staff interviews. Specific deficiencies included not identifying a serious mental illness for a resident with a qualifying PASRR Level II screening, incorrectly coding a resident's discharge location as a nursing home instead of home, and omitting an active diagnosis of depression for a resident receiving antidepressant medication. Additionally, a resident admitted to hospice care was not coded as terminally ill or as receiving hospice services on the MDS, and another resident's application of dressings to lower extremity wounds was not documented in the MDS despite treatment records confirming the care was provided. These inaccuracies in MDS coding were confirmed by an administrative nurse and were found across multiple sections, including identification information, active diagnoses, health conditions, skin conditions, and special treatments. The errors were substantiated by medical records, physician orders, treatment administration records, and progress notes, all of which demonstrated discrepancies between the care provided or resident status and what was documented in the MDS assessments.
Failure to Transcribe Physician's Orders and Complete Laboratory Tests
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards for one resident by not transcribing a physician's order for six blood tests into the electronic medical record and not ensuring the collection of the required blood specimens. The physician's order, dated 03/26/25, was present in the resident's medical record, but there was no documentation that the laboratory tests had been completed. During interviews, administrative staff confirmed that the order was not transcribed and the blood specimens were not collected as required.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing Assistance and Maintain Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with bathing for a resident who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living due to weakness. A family member reported concerns about the resident's personal hygiene, specifically noting unclean fingernails and questioning whether scheduled weekly baths were being provided. Observations confirmed the presence of dark areas under the resident's fingernails on two consecutive days. Review of the resident's care plan indicated the need for staff assistance with bathing and transfers. Documentation for March, April, and May showed inconsistent records of completed or refused baths/showers, with several instances lacking any documentation of whether bathing was provided or refused. An administrative nurse confirmed the absence of required documentation for scheduled bathing assistance.
Missing Hospice Election Forms in Resident Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the medical records of two residents receiving hospice services contained the required hospice election forms. Review of the hospice contract and facility policy confirmed that providing and obtaining the hospice election form is a responsibility of both the hospice agency and designated facility staff. For one resident, a nurse's note documented enrollment in hospice for end-of-life care, but the corresponding hospice election of benefits form was missing from the medical record. For the second resident, both a physician's order for hospice admission and a nurse's note confirming hospice admission were present, yet the hospice election form was also absent from the record. An administrative nurse verified that both records lacked the necessary documentation.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from sexual and mental abuse, as evidenced by the actions of a staff member who took inappropriate images and videos of residents. This deficiency affected five current residents and one former resident, as identified through a review of a staff member's electronic device. The inappropriate actions were discovered when law enforcement notified the facility of the staff member's arrest, revealing the presence of these images and videos. The facility's policy on abuse, neglect, and exploitation, as well as its policy on employee social media use, were not effectively implemented or enforced. The policies clearly prohibit the taking and sharing of unauthorized photographs or recordings of residents, especially those that could demean or humiliate them. Despite these policies, a staff member engaged in such behavior, leading to the identification of multiple residents in the inappropriate content. The residents involved had varying levels of cognitive impairment, with some having intact cognition and others being moderately to severely impaired. The failure to protect these residents from abuse was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy situation, indicating a serious threat to their health and safety. The deficiency was considered past non-compliance as corrective actions were taken prior to the survey.
Removal Plan
- Terminated staff member (#2).
- Educated all staff on-duty and all on-coming staff on facility's policy/procedure for abuse, neglect and exploitation, and social media use.
- Completed assessments of all residents.
- Notified the medical director.
- Reviewed facility policies and resources and updated as necessary.
- Interviewed all staff to identify any allegation of misconduct to include taking of inappropriate photos/videos of residents.
- Maintained contact with law enforcement agencies to identify possible affected residents and appropriate next steps.
- Implemented behavior monitoring for all residents identified.
Failure to Protect Resident from Non-Consensual Sexual Contact
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from non-consensual sexual contact by another resident. The incident occurred when a staff member observed one resident with his hand down the front of another resident's pants. The resident who was subjected to the unwanted contact appeared distressed and attempted to swat the other resident away. The resident who initiated the contact was cognitively intact, while the resident who experienced the unwanted contact had severely impaired cognition due to dementia and Parkinson's disease. The incident was reported to the nursing staff, Executive Director, and social services, and local law enforcement was notified. The resident who experienced the unwanted contact was able to briefly describe the incident and reported not feeling in danger. The facility's policy on abuse, neglect, and exploitation, which prohibits non-consensual sexual contact, was not effectively implemented to prevent this incident.
Removal Plan
- Implemented 1 to 1 staff supervision/monitoring for Resident #1.
- Moved Resident #1's roommate to another room.
- Reeducated staff regarding 1 to 1 supervision and on the abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy.
- Interviewed other residents to determine if any other abuse occurred.
- Reported the concern to the North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services.
- Reported the concern to local Police Department.
Failure to Prevent Pressure Ulcer Development
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for a resident identified as having a stage IV pressure ulcer with exposed hardware. The facility did not evaluate risk factors that could impact the development of a pressure ulcer, nor did they implement, monitor, and modify interventions to reduce those risk factors. This resulted in the resident developing an avoidable, facility-acquired pressure ulcer. The resident was admitted to the facility following a fall and surgery for a broken right ankle. The facility's policy required regular skin assessments and documentation of any changes in wound status, appearance, color, wound healing, signs of infection, wound size, and stage. However, the staff failed to address the surgical incision on the resident's right ankle during daily dressing changes and did not document or report any changes in the wound status. The resident's progress notes indicated that the surgical wound was not properly assessed or monitored, leading to the development of a stage IV pressure ulcer with 80% hardware exposure. The facility did not identify the pressure ulcer before it progressed to this severe stage, and the staff failed to document wound measurements on the admission skin assessment and complete non-pressure weekly tracker assessments.
Removal Plan
- Assess the pressure ulcer to Resident #138 right ankle.
- Complete an investigation into the facility acquired pressure ulcer.
- Determine nursing staff failed to document wound measurements on the admission skin assessment.
- Determine nursing staff failed to complete non-pressure weekly tracker assessments.
- Determine nursing staff removed pressure relieving interventions from the care plan.
- Educate Resident #138 regarding the need for pressure relieving interventions.
- Update Resident #138's care plan.
- Audit other residents with surgical wounds and/or cam boots.
- Update other residents' care plans.
- Educate staff regarding skin injuries and interventions.
- Add surgical skin areas and wounds to the wound tracker (computer program).
- Complete audits on skin injuries.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for four of the twelve sampled residents, which affected the accuracy of resident assessments and potentially the development of comprehensive care plans. For Resident #18, the facility did not correctly code the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) section, despite a PASRR Level II Outcome indicating a diagnosis of Bipolar II Disorder. This error was confirmed by a social services staff member during an interview. Additionally, the facility made errors in coding the medication sections for Residents #2 and #28. Resident #2's MDS was incorrectly coded to reflect seven days of insulin injections, although the resident was receiving Trulicity, a non-insulin medication, once a week. This mistake was acknowledged by an MDS coordinator. Similarly, Resident #28's MDS failed to indicate the use of a diuretic, despite physician orders for daily Chlorthalidone. This error was also confirmed by an MDS coordinator.
Failure to Follow Insulin Administration Policy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice for insulin preparation and administration for two residents. During an observation, a nurse prepared a NovoLog insulin pen for a resident and administered the insulin by inserting the needle into the resident's abdomen and pressing the injection button until the dose selector reached 0. However, the nurse did not keep the needle in the skin for up to 10 seconds as required by the facility's policy. In another instance, a different nurse prepared an Asepet insulin pen for another resident and primed the pen horizontally by dialing it to 2, which did not comply with the facility's policy for priming insulin pens. These actions resulted in a failure to follow the facility's insulin administration policy, potentially leading to inaccurate dosing.
Medication Labeling Deficiency During Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications during the administration of insulin for one resident. During an observation, a nurse prepared insulin for a resident and removed a plastic bag labeled with the resident's name from the medication cart. The bag contained NovoLog and Tresiba insulin pens. However, the NovoLog pen lacked a medication label with the resident's name and administration instructions, and the Tresiba insulin pen lacked an open date. This was contrary to the facility's policy on insulin administration, which requires documenting the open date on the pen body and verifying that the medication label matches the Medication Administration Record (MAR). An administrative nurse confirmed that staff are expected to follow the facility policy to ensure insulin pens have a label and an open date.
Failure to Notify Resident Representative and Physician
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the resident representative of a care conference for a resident who was reviewed for care conferences. The facility's policy requires that the comprehensive care plan be prepared by an interdisciplinary team, including the resident and the resident's representative, to the extent practicable. However, the medical record of the resident identified a representative as the primary power of attorney for medical and financial decisions, but there was no evidence that the facility notified this representative of the care conference. An administrative staff member confirmed the failure to notify the resident's representative. Additionally, the facility failed to notify a physician of a change in condition for a resident who experienced high blood sugar levels. The facility's policy mandates that when a resident presents with a possible change of condition, such as elevated blood glucose levels, the resident's physician should be notified. The medical record of the resident, who had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, showed multiple instances of blood sugar readings above the ordered parameters. Despite this, there was no evidence that the facility notified the resident's physician of these high readings. Interviews with administrative nurses confirmed that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of the high blood sugar readings. The lack of notification could prevent the physician from evaluating and prescribing an appropriate treatment plan. The resident's representative also stated that they had not been contacted regarding the resident's care plans or significant changes in the resident's status, further highlighting the communication deficiencies within the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 22 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Minot
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Homes | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Souris Valley Care Center | 20.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Minot Health And Rehab, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.