Sunplex Sub-acute Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Ocean Springs, Mississippi.
- Location
- 6520 Sunscope Drive, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564
- CMS Provider Number
- 255244
- Inspections on file
- 25
- Latest survey
- December 2, 2025
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 15 (6 serious)
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sunplex Sub-acute Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A CNA took a resident's debit card without permission and used it for unauthorized purchases at several locations, including liquor stores and a hotel. The resident, who was cognitively intact, was notified by her bank of suspicious activity, leading to an investigation that confirmed the CNA's involvement. The incident was reported to law enforcement, and the resident was reimbursed by her bank.
The facility did not specify required nurse and CNA staffing by shift and unit in its assessment, nor did it maintain an actionable contingency plan for staffing emergencies. During an influenza outbreak, only one nurse was left to care for 58 residents overnight, leading to missed medications and inadequate monitoring. The facility did not recognize the outbreak, implement infection control measures, or use its QAPI program to address these failures.
During an influenza outbreak, the facility did not identify the outbreak, failed to initiate droplet precautions, and did not post required signage or notify the local health department. Staff and families were not educated about the outbreak, and the Infection Preventionist and clinical leadership did not verify isolation orders or monitor infection-control compliance. Antiviral medications were not administered as prescribed, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not followed during high-contact care activities. These failures led to continued exposure and potential transmission of influenza among all residents.
The facility did not use its QAPI program to identify or correct failures in infection prevention, outbreak response, and staffing during a flu outbreak, resulting in missed medications, lack of outbreak recognition, failure to implement droplet precautions, and inadequate nurse coverage. The incident was not reviewed in QAPI meetings, and no changes were made to policies, procedures, or the facility assessment following the event.
During a period of increased resident illness due to an influenza outbreak, the facility failed to ensure adequate licensed nurse coverage, resulting in only one RN being responsible for all residents overnight. This led to multiple residents missing scheduled medications, including pain medications and IV antibiotics, and physicians were not notified of these omissions. The facility also did not implement appropriate infection control measures or maintain outbreak surveillance, and staff lacked clear direction regarding coverage responsibilities.
During an influenza outbreak, the facility failed to provide adequate licensed nurse and CNA coverage, resulting in missed medications and lack of resident monitoring when only one RN was responsible for all residents overnight. Several residents missed scheduled showers and baths due to insufficient CNA staffing, and both staff and residents reported ongoing issues with staffing shortages. The facility's policies and contingency planning were inadequate to address staffing emergencies, and the Medical Director was not informed of the situation.
Surveyors observed expired bread, thickened milk, and peanut butter pudding, as well as spoiled bell peppers and improperly stored teriyaki sauce. The dietary head confirmed staff were responsible for monitoring expiration dates and storage requirements, while the Administrator stated that staff are expected to routinely check and follow procedures.
A resident with heart failure had multiple inaccurate weights entered into the medical record by different LPNs, resulting in significant discrepancies and incorrect weight alerts in the system. The errors were confirmed by the DON and an RN, and the facility's review process did not prevent or promptly identify these documentation mistakes.
The QAPI Committee failed to sustain corrective actions for previously cited food storage and sanitation deficiencies, resulting in expired and spoiled food not being discarded and improper refrigeration of items. Despite monthly QAPI meetings and existing policies, surveyors observed repeated noncompliance during kitchen inspections, confirming ongoing issues with safe and sanitary food handling.
A resident with diabetes and intact cognition was left with visibly soiled bed linens for several days, including blood stains from weeping and bleeding legs. Despite staff awareness and facility policy requiring clean linens at least every other day and as needed, the linens were not changed, and clean linens were left unused in the room.
The facility did not develop a care plan for a resident with an indwelling catheter and failed to implement scheduled bathing interventions for two residents, resulting in multiple missed showers and baths. Staff and administration were aware of these issues, which were attributed in part to CNA staffing challenges.
An LPN did not administer prescribed Icar-C and Cyanocobalamin tablets to a resident with chronic kidney disease and moderate cognitive impairment because the medications were not available. The LPN marked the medications as 'on order' in the eMAR but did not notify the physician or attempt to obtain the medications from another pharmacy, contrary to facility policy. Interviews with staff confirmed the required notifications and actions were not taken.
Three residents who required staff assistance for ADLs did not receive scheduled baths or showers as documented, with only one bath recorded for one resident in a month and multiple missed showers for others. Residents and family members reported infrequent bathing and unaddressed preferences, while staff and leadership cited ongoing CNA staffing shortages as the main cause for the missed care and incomplete documentation.
A resident with chronic bronchitis and asthma was found to have an inhaler stored at the bedside without an assessment for safe self-administration or a physician's order authorizing bedside storage. The resident, who was cognitively intact, used the inhaler as needed without notifying staff, and facility staff were unaware of the medication's presence in the room. Facility policy required both an assessment and an order for self-administration, neither of which had been completed.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and identified as an elopement risk was able to exit the facility by following a dietary aide out the front door. The aide, mistaking the resident for a visitor due to her appearance, allowed her to leave. The resident remained outside for about 35 minutes before being found and escorted back inside without injury. The incident occurred despite the resident wearing an elopement-risk bracelet and being listed in the facility's wander book.
A resident fell from the bed during a bed bath, resulting in bilateral femoral fractures. The CNA providing care was unable to prevent the fall as the resident became slippery and rolled out of bed while holding onto the side rail. The facility's policy on accident prevention was not effectively implemented, leading to the incident being ruled as accidental.
A facility's QAPI program failed to prevent a resident from sustaining bilateral fractures after a CNA's attempt to provide care resulted in the resident rolling out of bed. This incident followed a previous citation for improper positioning leading to injury, indicating ineffective systemic corrective actions.
A resident with paraplegia fell out of bed due to inadequate supervision and improper positioning by two CNAs. While one CNA left the room, the other attempted to reposition the resident, resulting in the resident sliding out of bed and sustaining injuries. The facility's investigation ruled the fall accidental, despite the resident's report of feeling pushed.
A facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature, affecting a resident and potentially all residents. The steam table was partially inoperable, and trays were not covered during preparation, leading to cold meals. Despite complaints, the issue persisted for months. A cognitively intact resident with osteoarthritis and hypertension was among those affected.
The facility failed to maintain food safety and hygiene in the kitchen, with observations of spoiled bell peppers, exposed seasonings, and improper handling of a glove picked up from the floor. The cook and Dietary Manager acknowledged their responsibility for maintaining food quality, while the Administrator emphasized the expectation for proper storage and disposal.
The facility submitted inaccurate staffing data to CMS for the second quarter of 2024 due to coding errors in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system. Staff working multiple roles were not correctly coded, leading to reports of low weekend staffing and a one-star rating. The issue was identified through staff interviews and data review, with the Administrator acknowledging the problem and the need for manual coding adjustments.
The facility failed to resolve a grievance about cold food reported by residents over several months. Despite initial attempts to address the issue by speeding up tray delivery, the problem persisted due to a malfunctioning steam table. The Dietary Manager and Maintenance Director were aware of the issue, but repairs were delayed due to dry-rotted components and lack of follow-up. The current Administrator was not informed until recently, highlighting a breakdown in communication and timely resolution.
A medication cart was found unlocked and unattended in a hallway, containing unsecured pills and a needle. The cart had been left by an LPN due to a broken lock, and the night shift failed to remove the medications. The DON and Administrator expected the cart to be secured and removed from the facility.
The facility failed to serve meals simultaneously to residents seated at the same table, affecting three residents who experienced delays in receiving their lunch. Despite being cognitively intact and having specific medical conditions, these residents expressed dissatisfaction with the timing of their meal service. Staff acknowledged the issue, recognizing it as a concern for resident dignity.
The facility failed to honor residents' requests for alternative meals, specifically hamburgers and fries, despite these options being listed on the alternative menu. Two residents reported being denied these meals, with staff citing budget concerns and previous overconsumption as reasons. The facility's policy on resident rights and menu alternatives was not followed, and the change in menu options was not communicated to the residents. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the residents' dissatisfaction with the menu.
A significant medication error occurred when an LPN applied a new Duragesic (fentanyl) patch to a resident without removing the old one, resulting in the resident having two patches on when arriving at the emergency department. The facility's policy requires the removal of the old patch before applying a new one, but the LPN could not find the old patch and assumed it had been removed by the previous shift.
CNA Misappropriation of Resident Property
Penalty
Summary
A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) removed a resident's debit card from her purse without permission and used it at multiple locations for unauthorized purchases. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with acute exacerbation, reported that her card was used at liquor stores, gift shops, and a hotel. The CNA was identified through interviews and confirmation from a local hotel registry, as well as his own admission to using the card for various purchases including gas, liquor, food, and a hotel room. The incident was discovered after the resident's bank notified her of suspicious activity, and the facility's administrator was informed of the missing card and unauthorized charges. The facility's abuse and neglect policy defines misappropriation of resident property as the wrongful use of a resident's belongings or money without consent. The CNA provided conflicting accounts during interviews but ultimately admitted to using the resident's card. The incident was reported to local law enforcement, the State Agency, and the Attorney General's Office. The resident pressed charges, and the bank reimbursed her for the stolen funds. The facility did not have video surveillance to further support the investigation.
Failure to Maintain Adequate Staffing Assessment and Contingency Plan During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its facility-wide assessment contained the required details regarding staffing needs by shift and by unit, and did not maintain an actionable contingency plan for staffing emergencies. The assessment only included hours per resident day (HPRD) rather than specifying the number of licensed nurses and CNAs needed per shift and per unit. During an influenza outbreak, the facility did not update the assessment or contingency plan to address the increased risk and staffing needs, and administrative staff were used to assist with care when a nurse called in sick, but no agency staff were used and no formal process was in place to secure additional coverage. On the night in question, only one nurse was responsible for 58 residents from midnight until 7 AM, resulting in missed medications and inadequate monitoring for residents on one unit. The administrator and DON were aware of the staffing shortage and attempted to contact other nurses, including those at sister facilities, but were unable to secure additional coverage. The administrator assisted at the nursing station, but the facility's contingency plan did not provide clear procedures for securing coverage during emergencies or staff call-offs, and no updates were made to the plan following the incident. The facility did not identify the influenza outbreak when three residents tested positive, did not initiate droplet precautions, notify the health department, provide timely antiviral treatment, or maintain outbreak surveillance and staff illness tracking. The facility also failed to use its QAPI program to identify and correct system failures in infection control and staffing during the outbreak. These failures resulted in the facility being unprepared for staff absences during the influenza outbreak, placing all residents at risk for serious illness, harm, impairment, or death.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse, and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions were decided as in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions. The Administrator would review policy for QAPI for any changes needed and as re-education in policy.
- The Administrator would review and update facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies.
- Administrative nurses would complete a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building.
- The Infection Preventionist would be in-serviced on the roles and responsibilities of an Infection Preventionist.
- Policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and the expectations of the Infection Preventionist were all reviewed and updated. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified Medical Director of missed medications during QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with Medical Director during this meeting. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an in-service for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on QAPI plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The QAPI plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up QAPI meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Implement Infection Control Measures During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices to prevent and contain the spread of influenza when three residents tested positive for influenza within a short period, affecting all 59 residents in the facility. The facility did not identify the presence of an outbreak, did not initiate droplet precautions, and failed to post appropriate signage or notify the local health department as required by policy and CDC guidance. Staff and family education regarding the outbreak was not provided, and the Infection Preventionist and clinical leadership did not verify isolation orders or monitor staff illness and infection-control compliance. Additionally, antiviral medications were not administered as prescribed, resulting in continued exposure and potential transmission of influenza throughout the facility. Specific failures included not implementing daily active surveillance for influenza illness among residents, healthcare personnel, and visitors after the first laboratory-confirmed case. Visual alerts and signage about respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette were not posted at entrances or in common areas, and symptomatic residents were not consistently placed on droplet precautions. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent use of personal protective equipment (PPE), with some staff wearing masks and others not, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage was used instead of droplet precautions for residents with confirmed influenza. Residents with flu-like symptoms were not always tested for influenza or offered antiviral treatment, and group activities and communal dining were not restricted during the outbreak. The facility also failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high-contact care activities, such as catheter care, for a resident with an indwelling catheter. Staff did not consistently don gowns as required, and appropriate signage was not placed on resident doors. The Infection Preventionist was new to the position and was not present during critical periods of the outbreak, leading to a lack of oversight and documentation. The facility did not maintain a line list or illness log, did not track or trend new cases or staff illness, and did not provide in-service training specific to influenza precautions during the outbreak. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation, as determined by the surveyors.
Removal Plan
- All corrective actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) were completed
Failure to Use QAPI to Address Infection Control and Staffing During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to utilize its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to identify, analyze, and correct systemic failures in infection prevention and control, as well as staffing, during an influenza outbreak affecting all 59 residents. The outbreak occurred over several days, during which the facility did not recognize the outbreak, did not initiate droplet precautions, failed to notify the local health department, and did not ensure that antiviral medications were administered as prescribed. There was also a lack of monitoring for staff illness and compliance with infection control measures, resulting in continued exposure and spread of influenza within the facility. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that the QAPI Committee did not meet during or after the outbreak, and the incident was not discussed in any quality review process. The Medical Director was not fully informed about the number of affected residents, the implementation of infection control measures, or staffing shortages. The Infection Preventionist was not aware of the specific infection control measures implemented, did not maintain illness logs, and was unfamiliar with the facility's infection control policies. The Administrator and DON did not consider the outbreak an emergency, did not update the facility assessment or contingency plan, and did not verify the implementation of appropriate precautions or notification procedures. No internal investigation was conducted regarding missed medications, and the pharmacy and state agency were not notified. During the outbreak, there was insufficient licensed nurse coverage, with only one nurse responsible for 58 residents overnight, leading to missed medications and inadequate monitoring. The facility assessment lacked required details on staffing needs by shift and unit, and the contingency plan for staffing emergencies was not actionable. The Administrator and DON described the incident as isolated and made no changes to policies or procedures as a result. The QAPI process was not used to review or address the deficiencies in infection control or staffing, and no lessons were identified or learned from the incident.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions were decided as in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions. The Administrator would review policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for any changes needed and as re-education in policy. The Administrator would review and update facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies. Administrative nurses would complete a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building. The Infection Preventionist would be in-serviced on the roles and responsibilities of an Infection Preventionist. Policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and the expectations of the Infection Preventionist were all reviewed and updated. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified Medical Director of missed medications during QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with Medical Director during this meeting. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an inservice for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Administer Medications and Provide Supervision During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from neglect by not ensuring prescribed medications were administered, failing to notify physicians of missed medications, and not providing appropriate supervision and monitoring during a period of increased resident illness and high acuity related to an influenza outbreak. On the night in question, only one RN was present in the facility from approximately midnight to 7:00 AM, responsible for all 58 residents, including those on two separate units. This staffing shortage resulted from a nurse calling in sick, with no documented attempts by facility leadership to secure replacement coverage, and no nurse being assigned to one of the units. The facility's daily assignment sheets and timecards confirmed that only one licensed nurse was present during this critical period, and the facility's contingency plan for staffing emergencies was found to be inadequate and lacking actionable processes. Multiple residents did not receive their scheduled medications, including pain medications, antibiotics, and other essential treatments. For example, one resident did not receive morning doses of hydrocodone, Lasix, or gabapentin; another missed doses of pregabalin, sodium chloride, and other medications; and a resident on IV antibiotics did not receive scheduled doses. Medication Administration Records and controlled drug logs confirmed these omissions, and interviews with residents and staff corroborated that medications were missed and not administered as ordered. Additionally, the facility failed to notify physicians of these missed medications, and the medical director was unaware of the situation until informed by surveyors. During the influenza outbreak, the facility did not identify the outbreak in a timely manner, failed to initiate droplet precautions, did not notify the health department, and did not provide timely antiviral treatment or maintain outbreak surveillance and staff illness tracking. The facility's policies required adequate staffing and oversight, but these were not followed, and the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program did not identify or correct the systemic failures in infection control and staffing. Interviews with staff and leadership confirmed a lack of clear direction regarding nursing coverage responsibilities, insufficient oversight, and a lack of timely physician notification for missed medications, placing all residents at risk during the outbreak.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse, and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions included in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions, reviewing policy for QAPI for any changes needed and as re-education in policy, reviewing and updating facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies, completing a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building, in-servicing the Infection Preventionist on roles and responsibilities, and reviewing and updating policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and expectations of the Infection Preventionist. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified the Medical Director of missed medications during the QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with the Medical Director. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an in-service for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The QAPI plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up QAPI meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Provide Sufficient Nursing and Nurse Aide Staffing During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient licensed nurse and nurse aide coverage to meet resident needs, particularly during an influenza outbreak. On one unit, only one Registered Nurse was responsible for all 58 residents in the facility overnight, resulting in missed medications and lack of resident monitoring. The facility's staffing records showed that only one nurse was present from approximately midnight to 7:00 AM, and there was no documentation of efforts to secure additional coverage after a nurse called in sick. Interviews with staff confirmed that the on-call nurse was also ill and unable to work, and that administrative staff, who were not licensed nurses, attempted to assist but could not provide necessary care or medication administration. Residents reported not receiving their scheduled morning medications, including pain medications, and staff confirmed that medication passes were missed. In addition to the nursing shortage, the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse aide staffing to ensure that residents received scheduled showers and baths. Documentation revealed that several residents missed multiple scheduled showers or baths over the course of a month, and both residents and staff reported that there were not enough CNAs to complete all required bathing care. Interviews with CNAs and LPNs indicated that staffing levels were inadequate to meet resident needs, especially on shower days, and that management was aware of the ongoing problem. The Director of Nursing and Administrator both acknowledged that CNA staffing shortages and high resident acuity were persistent issues, particularly on weekends. The facility's policies and facility assessment did not provide adequate detail on staffing needs by shift and by unit, nor did they include a specific contingency plan for staffing emergencies. The facility lacked a current policy for contingency or emergency staffing and did not have a documented process for on-call procedures in the event of staff call-ins. During the influenza outbreak, the facility did not activate its emergency plan or utilize agency staff, and no updates were made to the contingency plan following the incident. The Medical Director was not informed of the staffing shortage during the outbreak and stated that additional staff should have been provided given the increase in resident acuity.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions were decided as in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions. The Administrator would review policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for any changes needed and as re-education in policy. The Administrator would review and update facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies. Administrative nurses would complete a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building. The Infection Preventionist would be in-serviced on the roles and responsibilities of an Infection Preventionist. Policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and the expectations of the Infection Preventionist were all reviewed and updated. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified Medical Director of missed medications during QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with Medical Director during this meeting. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an in-service for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Store and Maintain Food Items Safely and Sanitarily
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and maintain food items in a safe and sanitary manner, as evidenced by multiple expired and spoiled products found during surveyor observation. Specifically, ten loaves of wheat bread with an expiration date that had already passed were found, along with five quarts each of nectar-consistency and moderately thick Thick & Easy milk, both past their use-by dates. Additionally, an opened gallon of Sweet Baby Ray's teriyaki sauce was stored on a dry goods shelf instead of being refrigerated as required by the manufacturer's instructions. In the refrigerator, peanut butter pudding with an expired date and three bell peppers that were deteriorating and macerated were also observed. The Head of the dietary department acknowledged these findings and confirmed that dietary staff were responsible for ensuring food items were not expired, were refrigerated appropriately, and were not overly ripe. The Administrator stated that dietary staff are expected to receive regular in-service training, perform routine checks of food storage areas, and consistently follow established procedures, noting that the staff involved had been employed at the facility for an extended period and should be familiar with these tasks.
Inaccurate Weight Documentation in Resident Medical Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately document a resident's weight in the medical record, resulting in inconsistencies and incorrect clinical data for one of the sampled residents. Specifically, the resident's weight was recorded as 76.7 pounds on one date, while two days earlier it was documented as 167.2 pounds. Additionally, another set of weights showed a significant discrepancy, with 159.5 pounds recorded on one date and 189 pounds five days later. These errors were confirmed by both the Director of Nursing and a Registered Nurse, who identified that the weights were entered incorrectly in the electronic medical record by different LPNs. The inaccuracies led to the system incorrectly triggering weight alerts, which did not reflect the resident's actual clinical status. The resident involved had been admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, and the Minimum Data Set assessment indicated a significant weight loss over the review period. The errors in weight documentation were not identified at the time of entry, resulting in inaccurate information being maintained in the resident's medical record. The facility's process for reviewing weights was not sufficient to prevent or promptly correct these documentation errors.
Repeat Deficiency in Food Storage and Sanitation Due to Ineffective QAPI Oversight
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent recurrence of a previously cited deficiency related to food storage and sanitation. Despite having a policy in place that requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation of corrective actions, the facility was cited again for failing to ensure food items were stored and maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. Specifically, surveyors found that expired products and spoiled food were not discarded, and some items were not refrigerated according to manufacturer's instructions. These issues were observed during kitchen inspections and were consistent with similar findings from a previous survey. Record reviews and staff interviews confirmed that the facility had been cited for the same deficiency in the past, indicating a lack of effective ongoing oversight and monitoring by the QAPI Committee. The Administrator acknowledged awareness of the previous deficiencies and stated that monthly QAPI meetings were held to address high-risk concerns, but the recurrence of the same issues demonstrated that the corrective actions were not sustained or effective in preventing the deficiency from happening again.
Failure to Provide Clean Linens and Maintain a Safe, Clean Environment
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was left with soiled bed linens for multiple days, despite facility policy requiring a safe, clean, and comfortable environment with clean bed and bath linens. Observations over several days revealed the resident's bed sheets were visibly soiled with blood and other stains, attributed to the resident's weeping and bleeding legs. The resident reported that her sheets were only changed on shower days, and on multiple occasions, she confirmed that her linens had not been changed for at least a week. Staff interviews corroborated that the soiled linens were not changed, even after being made aware of their condition, and clean linens were left in the room but not placed on the bed. The resident involved was cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 15, and had a medical history including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Despite the resident's ability to communicate her needs and the visible evidence of soiled linens, staff failed to provide timely linen changes. The DON and Administrator both acknowledged that residents should not be left on soiled linens and that linens are expected to be changed at least every other day and as needed, but these expectations were not met in this instance.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Catheter Care and Scheduled Bathing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for three residents, as required by policy. One resident with an indwelling catheter did not have a care plan addressing the use and care of the catheter, despite having a physician's order for catheter care and a diagnosis of mechanical complication of a urinary catheter. The resident's comprehensive MDS assessment also documented the presence of the catheter, but no corresponding care plan was created within the required timeframe. Additionally, two residents with scheduled bathing and shower interventions in their care plans did not receive these services as planned. Documentation showed that one resident received only one bath during the month, missing twelve scheduled showers, while another resident missed seven scheduled showers. Both residents expressed dissatisfaction with the frequency of their baths and showers, and the DON acknowledged ongoing issues with staff following care plans for bathing due to CNA staffing challenges. Interviews with staff and administration confirmed awareness of the missed care and the lack of a care plan for the resident with a catheter.
Failure to Administer Ordered Medications and Notify Physician
Penalty
Summary
Nursing staff failed to administer prescribed medications to a resident as required by professional standards and facility policy. During a medication administration observation, an LPN did not provide the resident with Icar-C and Cyanocobalamin tablets because the medications were not available in the medication cart and were still on order. The LPN marked the medications as 'on order' in the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) but did not notify the physician or the resident's representative about the missed doses, nor did she attempt to obtain the medications from an alternate pharmacy source. Interviews with the LPN, RN, DON, and Administrator confirmed that the LPN did not follow the facility's policy, which requires notification and efforts to secure medications from other sources when they are unavailable. The resident involved had a history of chronic kidney disease and a moderately impaired cognitive status, as indicated by a BIMS score of 10. The failure to administer the ordered medications and the lack of appropriate notifications or attempts to obtain the medications from another pharmacy source were directly observed and confirmed through interviews and record reviews. Facility policy required that medications be administered as prescribed and that appropriate steps be taken when medications are unavailable, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Hygiene Assistance Due to Staffing Shortages
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide scheduled bathing and personal hygiene assistance to residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL), as required by their care plans and personal preferences. Three residents, all cognitively intact and requiring varying levels of assistance, were identified as not receiving the number of baths or showers scheduled for them. Documentation for these residents showed significant gaps, with one resident receiving only one bath in a month and others missing multiple scheduled showers. Residents expressed a desire for more frequent bathing and reported that their preferences were not being honored. Interviews with residents, family members, and staff confirmed that missed showers and baths were a recurring issue. Residents reported receiving baths only once a week despite wanting more frequent care, and family members observed signs of inadequate hygiene. Staff interviews revealed that CNA staffing shortages were a primary reason for the missed care, with CNAs unable to complete all scheduled showers and bed baths. Staff also noted discrepancies between assignment sheets and actual care provided, and acknowledged that documentation did not always accurately reflect the care delivered. Facility leadership, including the DON and Administrator, were aware of ongoing complaints and attributed the deficiencies to insufficient CNA staffing. The DON confirmed that staff were expected to honor resident preferences and make multiple attempts before documenting refusals, but acknowledged that this was not consistently happening. The Administrator also recognized the problem and stated that management had discussed revising the shower schedule, but at the time of the survey, residents continued to miss scheduled showers and baths.
Failure to Secure Medications and Assess for Safe Self-Administration
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was allowed to keep an inhaler at the bedside without an assessment for safe self-administration and without a physician's order authorizing the medication to be kept at the bedside. Multiple observations over several days confirmed the inhaler was in plain view on the resident's bedside table, and the empty inhaler box was also present in the room. The resident reported using the inhaler as needed and stated that staff had previously left it in her room because she did not always require it when offered. The resident did not notify staff when using the inhaler. Facility policy required an interdisciplinary team assessment and a physician's order for self-administration of medications at the bedside, neither of which had been completed for this resident. The LPN was unaware that the resident had the inhaler at the bedside and confirmed there was no request for it. The DON acknowledged that no assessment or order was in place for the resident to self-administer the inhaler. The resident was cognitively intact, with a BIMS score of 15, and had diagnoses of chronic bronchitis and asthma, with a standing order for the inhaler as needed for shortness of breath.
Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Resident Identification
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident, identified as an elopement risk with a BIMS score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment, was able to exit the facility without authorization. The resident, who had diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalopathy and vascular dementia, was last seen in the main lobby by her assigned CNA before the CNA left for a scheduled lunch break. Upon the CNA's return, the resident was missing from both the common area and her room, prompting immediate notification to the RN/MDS nurse and the initiation of a facility-wide search. The investigation revealed that the resident followed a dietary aide out of the front door as the aide was leaving at the end of his shift. The dietary aide, who did not recognize the individual as a resident due to her street clothes and purse, assumed she was a visitor and allowed her to exit behind him. The aide later observed the resident attempting to enter a parked vehicle in the lot before returning to the facility entrance. The resident remained outside for approximately 35 minutes before being found knocking on the front door by another CNA during the search. At the time she was found, the resident was appropriately dressed, carrying her purse, and did not display signs of distress or injury. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was care-planned as an elopement risk, wore a yellow identification bracelet, and was listed in the facility's wander book. Despite these precautions, the dietary aide was unaware of her status and allowed her to exit. The facility is located near a four-lane highway and industrial complex, with no fencing or restricted barriers between the grounds and the surrounding area. The failure to provide adequate supervision and to ensure staff could properly identify residents resulted in the resident's unauthorized exit and exposure to potential harm.
Removal Plan
- CNA#1 reported Resident #1 missing to MDS Nurse #1, who called Code W (elopement), and all staff began a search of the facility and perimeter.
- Resident #1 was brought inside with no signs of distress after being found outside.
- Administrator was notified by MDS Nurse about the incident.
- MDS Nurse completed a body audit with no signs or symptoms of injury.
- MDS Nurse completed a head count of all current residents in the facility.
- MDS Nurse notified Resident #1's representative of the incident.
- Medical Director was notified of Resident #1's incident and no new orders were given.
- Administrator arrived at the facility and checked that all doors were functioning properly.
- Administrator interviewed all employees and any residents that had interactions with Resident #1 prior to the incident.
- Administrator began in-service for all employees on elopement policy and procedures; all staff would be in-serviced before returning to their next shift.
- Administrator reported incident to State Agency.
- An emergency Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meeting was held to discuss incident, actions taken, and further interventions.
- Social Services Director spoke with Resident #1 and noted no psychosocial harm due to incident.
- Maintenance Director conducted a quality check of all doors to make sure they were operating as expected and door alarms were added to all of the doors.
- Regional Director of Operations interviewed Resident #1 and Resident #2 for any details they remember about the incident.
- Education of elopement policy and procedures with dietary staff, including Dietary Aide #1.
- Wander assessments were completed on all active residents in the facility by DON, RN #1, LPN #1, and Medical Records LPN.
- Maintenance Director began elopement drills for all shifts.
- A follow up QAPI committee meeting was held by Administrator to discuss that all interventions were in place.
- Maintenance will conduct a quality check of all doors, an elopement drill on each shift and put alarms on each of the doors.
- Administrative nurses completed wander assessments on all current residents, update care plans and wander books accordingly; completed a 100 percent audit of care plans; completed 100 percent audit of wander books located at both nurse's stations.
- Social services would interview Resident #1 for any psychosocial harm.
- Administrative staff would in-service all employees on elopement policy and procedures before their next shift.
- Elopement drills on all shifts and one elopement drill per week for four weeks on alternating shifts and one per month for six months on alternating shifts.
- Person-centered in-services will be completed with all staff for any new residents identified as an elopement risk or any current residents who are newly identified as an elopement risk.
- Incident was reported to Attorney General's office by Administrator.
Resident Falls During Bed Bath Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident during a bed bath, resulting in the resident falling from the bed and sustaining bilateral femoral fractures. The incident occurred when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was providing care and a bath to the resident, who was able to assist with bed mobility. During the bath, the resident became slippery and rolled out of bed while attempting to hold onto the side rail. The CNA was unable to catch the resident before she fell to the floor. The facility's policy on accidents and incidents emphasizes maintaining a resident environment free of hazards and providing supervision to prevent accidents. However, during the incident, the resident's slipperiness due to the bath was not adequately managed, leading to the fall. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator were notified of the incident, and an investigation was conducted, which ruled the fall as accidental. The resident had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation and was assessed as having no impairment to her upper extremities and being able to roll with partial/moderate assistance.
Failure in QAPI Program Leads to Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively addressed and prevented the recurrence of resident accidents. This deficiency was highlighted by an incident involving a resident who sustained bilateral fractures. The incident occurred when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) attempted to provide care and a bath to the resident. During the process, the resident was turned onto her left side, and due to being slippery, she rolled out of bed, resulting in the fractures. This incident followed a prior citation for F689 (Accident Hazards) where two CNAs improperly positioned a resident in bed, leading to a fall with injury. Despite the facility's ongoing audits to monitor compliance with safety and accident prevention measures, the recurrence of such an incident indicates that the systemic corrective actions were not sustained effectively. The Director of Nurses confirmed the review of the previous CMS-2567 survey, acknowledging the continued efforts to monitor and prevent accidents, yet the deficiency persisted.
Inadequate Supervision Leads to Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident from falling out of bed due to inadequate supervision and improper positioning by two CNAs. The incident involved a resident with paraplegia who required substantial assistance with bed mobility. On the day of the incident, two CNAs were providing care to the resident, intending to transfer her to a wheelchair. However, they noticed the resident needed a brief change. During this process, one CNA left the room, leaving the other CNA to manage the resident alone. The remaining CNA attempted to reposition the resident using a draw sheet, which resulted in the resident sliding out of bed and falling to the floor. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported feeling as though she was pushed out of bed, although the facility's investigation concluded the fall was accidental. The resident sustained injuries, including bleeding from the right elbow, bruises on the right side, and swelling of the right knee. The bed was elevated to waist level, and the resident was found on the floor with a saturated brief and draw sheet. The facility's policy required that the resident environment be free of hazards and that residents receive adequate supervision, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Serve Food at Appetizing Temperature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature, affecting at least one resident and potentially all residents receiving meals from the dietary department. Observations and interviews revealed that the steam table used to keep food warm was partially inoperable, with two out of four compartments not functioning. The dietary staff attempted to mitigate this by pouring boiling water into one of the non-working compartments. Despite being informed, the maintenance department had not repaired or replaced the steam table. Additionally, during meal preparation, trays were not covered, which likely contributed to the food cooling down before reaching the residents. Resident #53, who was cognitively intact, along with other residents, had complained about receiving cold food for several months. The issue was not resolved despite being raised in Resident Council meetings over four of the past six months. The dietary manager confirmed that the food was lukewarm during a test tray evaluation. The facility's registered dietitian was unaware of the complaints, and the administrator was only recently informed of the issue. The resident involved had been admitted with diagnoses including bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee and essential hypertension.
Food Safety and Hygiene Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper food safety and hygiene practices in the kitchen, as observed during two separate inspections. During the first observation, three green bell peppers were found with soft, pliable spots and white biological growth, indicating spoilage. Additionally, 15 containers of seasonings were left open and exposed, which could lead to contamination. The cook acknowledged the condition of the bell peppers and the exposed seasonings, admitting unawareness of the produce's over-ripeness. The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed that both she and the cook were responsible for maintaining food quality and ensuring that spoiled foods were discarded and seasonings were properly sealed. In a subsequent observation, a staff member was seen picking up a glove from the floor and placing it on a food prep table where pureed tomatoes and sandwiches were being prepared. The cook admitted to this action, recognizing that the glove should have been discarded instead of being placed on the table. The DM was aware of these issues and stated that it was her expectation that spoiled foods be discarded, seasonings be closed, and items picked up from the floor be discarded appropriately. The facility's Administrator also acknowledged that these issues should not have occurred, emphasizing the expectation for proper storage and disposal of items.
Inaccurate Staffing Data Submission to CMS
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submissions to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were accurate for the second quarter of the 2024 fiscal year. This deficiency was identified through staff interviews and a review of Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (Casper) data, which revealed excessively low weekend staffing and a one-star staffing rating. The issue arose because several employees who worked multiple roles were not correctly coded in the PBJ system, leading to inaccurate staffing data being reported. Specific instances of incorrect coding were identified on several dates, affecting the reported staffing levels. Interviews with facility staff, including the Senior Director of Operations (SDO), Business Office Manager (BOM), and Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that the coding errors were due to the system defaulting to employees' primary roles, rather than reflecting their actual duties on specific days. The BOM, after attending a training session, discovered the coding discrepancies and conducted an audit that confirmed the errors. The Administrator, who had recently assumed her role, was informed of the issue and the need for manual coding adjustments to ensure accurate reporting. The deficiency was confirmed by the Administrator, who acknowledged the facility's one-star rating and the need for corrective action.
Unresolved Grievance of Cold Food Due to Malfunctioning Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to resolve a grievance regarding cold food reported by Resident Council members over a period of four out of six months. The facility's policy on grievances requires active resolution and keeping residents informed of progress, but this was not adhered to. Resident Council meeting minutes documented grievances about cold food, and during a meeting, several residents confirmed the issue persisted. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the reports and had previously attempted to address the issue by coordinating with the Director of Nursing to speed up tray delivery, which initially seemed effective. However, the problem persisted due to a malfunctioning steam table, which was reported to the Maintenance Department and the past Administrator. The Maintenance Director confirmed receiving a maintenance request for the steam table and attempted a repair, but the component was dry rotted. Despite informing the previous Administrator and ordering a part, the repair was unsuccessful, and no further action was taken until the current Administrator was informed by the Regional Director of Operations. The Administrator was unaware of the issue until recently and had not been informed by the Maintenance Director or the Dietary Manager. The Maintenance Director had not scheduled a technician to fix the steam table until the day before the surveyor's interview, indicating a lack of timely follow-up on the issue.
Unsecured Medication Cart Found in Hallway
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a medication cart was secured and locked, as observed during a survey. An unattended medication cart was found unlocked in the hallway, containing unsecured pills and a needle on top. The cart was left unattended by an LPN who was administering medications to residents down the hallway. The LPN admitted that the cart had been left unlocked due to a broken locking mechanism and had been stationed in the hallway since the previous Wednesday. The LPN was unaware of the needle and loose pills in the cart, acknowledging that a confused resident could have accessed them. The Director of Nursing (DON) explained that the medication cart was changed out by the night shift because it was broken and would not lock. The night shift failed to remove the needle and medications from the cart. The DON had not noticed the cart in the hallway and expected nurses to ensure medication carts are locked when not in use. The Administrator also expected medications and supplies to be secured in a medication room when not in use and stated that the broken cart should have been removed from the facility.
Failure to Serve Meals Simultaneously in Dining Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner during a dining room observation, as evidenced by not providing meals consecutively to all residents seated at the same table. On the observed day, 20 residents were in the dining room waiting for lunch, which was delayed due to kitchen issues. Staff members, including LPNs and a CNA, began serving trays, but some residents did not receive their meals at the same time as their tablemates. This delay in service was noted for three residents, who expressed dissatisfaction with the timing of their meal service. Resident #10, who was admitted with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, was cognitively intact and had been waiting since 11:30 AM. Despite being seated with another resident who received their meal earlier, Resident #10 did not receive his tray until much later, after repeated requests by staff. Similarly, Resident #27, diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and also cognitively intact, experienced a delay in receiving her meal, which was mistakenly placed on a hall cart. She expressed a desire to be served simultaneously with her tablemate. Resident #160, admitted with Paraplegia and assessed for modified independence, also faced a delay in meal service, which affected her routine, including her smoke break. The staff, including LPNs and the Dietary Manager, acknowledged the issue, confirming that not all residents were served at the same time, which was a concern for resident dignity. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator also recognized the dignity issue, emphasizing the expectation for all residents to be served simultaneously in the dining room.
Failure to Honor Resident Meal Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor the residents' requests for alternative menu options, specifically hamburgers and fries, as listed on the alternative menu. This deficiency was identified through observations, record reviews, and interviews with residents and staff. The facility's policy on resident rights and menu alternatives was not adhered to, as residents were not provided with the alternative meals they requested. The facility's policy stated that an alternative meat or entree and vegetable should be provided at every meal to accommodate personal food preferences or refusals. Resident #53, who was cognitively intact, reported that he had been requesting hamburgers and fries as an alternative meal for months, but was consistently denied. He was informed by staff that hamburgers and fries were not allowed due to previous overconsumption by residents, which led to budget concerns. Despite the alternative menu being posted in the dining room, the residents were not informed of the change in policy, and the old menu was never removed. Resident #18, who had severe cognitive impairment, also expressed a desire for hamburgers and fries, which he used to receive as an alternative meal, but was similarly denied. Interviews with staff, including LPNs, CNAs, the Dietary Manager, and the Registered Dietitian, revealed a lack of communication and awareness regarding the residents' dissatisfaction with the menu options. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the previous Administrator had decided to remove hamburgers and fries from the alternative menu due to budget concerns, but this decision was not communicated to the residents. The new Administrator, who had only been at the facility for three weeks, was unaware of the previous changes and expected the kitchen staff to honor residents' choices as per the alternative menu.
Failure to Remove Old Transdermal Patch Before Applying New One
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent a significant medication error involving a transdermal medication patch for one of the residents. The facility's policy on the application of transdermal patches requires the removal of the old patch before applying a new one. However, on 1/10/24, an LPN applied a new Duragesic (fentanyl) patch to a resident without removing the old one. The LPN reported that she could not find the old patch and assumed it had been removed by the previous shift. This resulted in the resident having two fentanyl patches on when he arrived at the emergency department on 1/12/24. The Medication Administration Record for January 2024 did not document the removal of the old patch on 1/10/24, only the application of the new one. The resident involved had a history of Alzheimer's Disease and Cerebral Infarction and was admitted to the facility on 12/31/21. The physician's order required the application of a Duragesic-25 patch every 72 hours, with the old patch to be removed per schedule. The Director of Nurses confirmed that the resident had two patches on before being sent to the emergency department. This incident highlights a failure in following the facility's medication administration policy, leading to a significant medication error.
Latest citations in Mississippi
A resident with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and cognitive impairment had a care plan directing staff to apply and remove a right ankle splint at specific times each day and to provide passive stretching to prevent decline in ROM. Observation found the splint not in use and lying on a chair, and the resident was unsure when it was last applied. A PTA reported the resident had developed foot drop and that the splint could no longer be applied without additional therapy, attributing this to the splint not being used daily as ordered. The DON confirmed that staff failed to follow the established care plan for splint application and ROM management.
A resident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis after a cerebral infarction, and severe cognitive impairment (BIMS 5), had physician and therapy orders for right-hand and right-ankle splinting with passive ROM to manage contractures and maintain ROM. Surveyors observed a foot splint lying unused and the resident’s right hand contracted into a fist without a hand roll. The resident could not recall when the foot splint was last applied and reported never having a hand roll. An LPN was unaware of the need for the splint and confirmed no hand roll was in use. Records showed the hand splint order was discontinued at the responsible party’s request due to pain, but OT was not notified and no alternative such as a hand roll was initiated. PT had documented improved ankle ROM and recommended a PODUS boot, while a PTA later reported the resident had developed foot drop related to the ankle splint not being applied as ordered. The DON confirmed that daily ankle splint orders existed and that the hand splint was discontinued without alternative interventions to prevent contracture.
The facility failed to protect resident narcotic medications from misappropriation when an LPN handed over a medication cart’s narcotic keys to an RN without performing required narcotic counts before and after the transfer, and the cart was later found unlocked in the nurses’ station. During the subsequent shift change count, staff discovered multiple missing doses of oxycodone-acetaminophen and hydrocodone-acetaminophen prescribed PRN for pain to four residents with conditions including dementia, COPD, dysphagia, and diabetic neuropathy. Review of individual controlled drug logs showed corrected balances to account for the missing tablets, confirming that controlled substances were unaccounted for during the period of unsecured cart access and improper key control.
Two ambulatory residents with dementia, severe cognitive deficits, and known wandering behavior, each wearing a wander guard bracelet, were able to exit through a unit door when a visitor held it open, despite the door alarm sounding and prior observations that they frequently walked together and approached doors. An LPN responded to the alarm and, along with other staff, initiated a search when the residents could not be found on the unit; staff ultimately located the residents across a four-lane highway and returned them to the building without injury. The incident occurred despite facility policies requiring use of a security system for residents unable to protect themselves from harm by wandering, and staff and leadership acknowledged that the residents had a history of walking the halls together and going to doors, and that increased monitoring and restricting visitor access to door codes could have prevented the elopement.
A cognitively impaired resident with dementia, agitation, and a history of wandering was previously assessed by the IDT as not being at risk for elopement and did not have elopement precautions in place. On one occasion, a visitor exited through the front door without realizing the resident followed outside, and staff later discovered the resident alone on the front porch after being missing for several minutes. An LPN and CNA participated in locating and returning the resident, and the incident revealed that supervision and elopement risk assessment were insufficient for this resident.
A resident with Type 2 DM and moderately impaired cognition had two unstageable heel DTIs documented on the MDS and physician orders for treatment to both heels, but the comprehensive care plan did not include any problem, goals, or interventions related to these pressure injuries. LPNs responsible for MDS and care plan completion acknowledged the omission and stated that although they periodically audit by comparing orders to the care plan, this situation was missed. The DON reported she expected the wound care nurse to update the care plan with new wound treatment orders, while an RN stated she could update interventions but had not been trained to create a new focused care plan and was unaware it was her responsibility to add the DTI treatment orders to the care plan.
A controlled substance prescribed for a cognitively intact resident with a left femur fracture was delivered and signed for by an LPN but was not entered on the narcotic accountability record or narcotic box package count and was later found to be missing. One LPN reported receiving the blister pack of thirty Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10-325 mg tablets from another LPN, placing it on the nurses’ station, and leaving the area, while both LPNs stated they were in the medication room as the medication remained unattended. The DON and Administrator confirmed that staff failed to secure the controlled medication as required by facility policy and that the missing tablets could not be located.
Surveyors found that staff failed to properly secure and store medications for two residents. For one resident, an LPN received a delivery of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, passed it to another LPN, and the controlled medication was left unattended at the nurses’ station instead of being immediately locked and entered into the narcotic count, after which it could not be located. For another resident, two bottles of Lorazepam oral concentrate, documented on the narcotic record and labeled to be protected from light and refrigerated, were observed stored in a locked medication cart rather than in the designated medication refrigerator, even though staff acknowledged knowing the manufacturer’s refrigeration requirement.
A resident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction was transferred by facility van to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation and was later determined by the facility to be discharged due to aggressive behavior and threats, with staff stating they could not meet the resident’s needs. The Administrator and Social Services Director communicated with the psychiatric facility and the resident’s family about finding alternative placement and informed the family the resident would not be allowed to return, but no formal involuntary discharge notice or written appeal rights were provided, and no physician discharge order was documented, contrary to facility policies requiring a completed transfer form and written notice of transfer/discharge with appeal information.
The facility did not adequately investigate, address, or resolve repeated grievances about food quality and temperature raised through Resident Council meetings. Over several months, residents reported that weekend meals were bad, food was consistently cold, beverages lacked sufficient ice, and breakfast items were hard or unpalatable. While limited steps such as using temperature-holding containers, sending trays out faster, and in-servicing dietary staff were noted, there was no documented monitoring, follow-up, or evaluation of effectiveness. Cognitively intact residents continued to report cold, poor-tasting food, and staff, including the Dietary Manager and Social Services, acknowledged awareness of the complaints without evidence of thorough follow-up or resolution.
Failure to Implement Care Plan for Ankle Splint and ROM Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for contracture management and splinting to prevent decline in range of motion for one resident. The facility’s policy on prevention of decline in range of motion required that, based on the comprehensive assessment, the facility provide interventions, exercises, and/or therapy to maintain or improve ROM. The resident’s care plan, initiated on 8/1/25, identified an ADL self-care performance deficit related to stroke, hemiplegia, and immobility, placing the resident at risk for functional decline. The care plan interventions directed staff to apply a splint to the right ankle after breakfast, provide passive stretch to the right ankle after applying the splint, remove the splint at lunchtime, reapply the splint after supper with passive stretch, and remove the splint at bedtime. On observation, the resident’s ankle splint was not in use and was found lying in a chair in the resident’s room, and the resident was unsure when the splint was last applied. The PTA reported that the resident had developed foot drop and that the ankle splint could no longer be placed without additional therapy, confirming this was related to the splint not being applied daily as ordered. The DON stated that the care plan was used to inform staff how to care for the resident and verified that staff failed to follow the care plan when they did not apply the ankle splint. Record review showed the resident was admitted with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and an MDS assessment indicated a BIMS score of 5, reflecting cognitive impairment at the time of the deficiency.
Failure to Implement ROM and Splinting Orders Resulting in Contractures and Foot Drop
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide ordered range of motion (ROM) and splinting interventions to prevent decline in ROM for a resident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. The resident was admitted with these diagnoses and had physician orders and therapy recommendations for contracture management and splinting. An OT evaluation documented decreased ROM in the right upper extremity and recommended a resting hand splint and a restorative splint and brace program, with a subsequent OT evaluation recommending continuation of the contracture management and splinting program. A physician order directed staff to apply a right-hand splint after breakfast, provide passive stretch to the right elbow, wrist, and hand once daily, and remove the splint before dinner. Another physician order required application of a right ankle splint after breakfast and after supper with passive stretching following application. The facility’s own policy stated that residents without limited ROM should not experience a reduction in ROM unless clinically unavoidable. During observation, surveyors noted a foot splint lying unused in the resident’s chair and the resident’s right hand contracted into a fist without a hand roll in place. The resident reported not knowing when the foot splint was last applied and stated she had never had a hand roll. An LPN stated she did not know why the splint was in the room, believed the resident was not required to wear it, and confirmed the resident did not have a hand roll. Record review showed the right-hand splint order was discontinued at the responsible party’s request due to pain, but the OT reported she had not been notified of this discontinuation and stated a hand roll should have been initiated when the splint was stopped; she further stated the resident’s hand was now contracted into a fist. A PT discharge summary documented improved right ankle ROM with therapy and recommended a PODUS boot daily for up to five hours, while a PTA later reported the resident had developed foot drop and that the ankle splint could no longer be applied without additional therapy, confirming this was related to the splint not being applied daily as ordered. The DON verified that there were physician orders for daily ankle splinting and acknowledged that the right-hand splint was discontinued without alternative interventions to prevent contracture. The resident’s MDS showed a BIMS score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment.
Failure to Secure Narcotic Medications and Maintain Key Control
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect resident medications from misappropriation on one of four medication carts, resulting in missing controlled substances for four residents. The facility’s abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy defines misappropriation of resident property as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful use of a resident’s belongings or money without the resident’s consent. On a specific date, during the 7:00 PM shift change narcotic count, staff identified that multiple doses of Percocet and Norco (hydrocodone-acetaminophen) were missing from the narcotic box on a single medication cart. Prior to this discovery, the assigned LPN had confirmed that the narcotic count was correct earlier in the day. The events leading to the deficiency included the LPN giving her medication cart narcotic keys to an RN while she left the area to perform a urine specimen collection. The LPN did not complete a narcotic count before or after transferring the keys, which was not in accordance with facility expectations for key control and chain of custody. When the LPN returned, she observed the medication cart in the nurses’ station and unlocked. The RN later confirmed that she had moved the cart into the nurses’ station but denied administering any medications during the time she had possession of the keys. During the subsequent 7:00 PM narcotic count, discrepancies were identified, and a search of the cart and nurses’ station did not locate the missing medications. Record review showed that four residents’ controlled medication logs required corrections to reflect missing tablets. One resident with dementia had an order for oxycodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg every 12 hours as needed for pain; the narcotic log initially showed a remaining balance of 20 tablets after a documented administration, but was later corrected to 16 tablets to account for four missing tablets. A second resident with COPD had an order for oxycodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg every eight hours as needed; the log was corrected from a remaining balance of five tablets to four, indicating one missing tablet. A third resident with dysphagia had an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg every 24 hours as needed; the log showed two tablets on hand after the resident returned from pass with no administrations documented, and was later corrected to zero, indicating two missing tablets. A fourth resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy had an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg every six hours as needed; the log was corrected from a remaining balance of eight tablets to seven, indicating one missing tablet. These discrepancies, combined with the unsecured cart and improper key transfer without counts, led to the determination that resident medications were not protected from misappropriation.
Failure to Prevent Elopement of Two Cognitively Impaired Wanderers
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision and prevent elopement for two residents with known wandering and elopement risk. Both residents were ambulatory, frequently walked throughout the facility together, and were known to staff as wanderers. Each resident had a diagnosis of dementia with severe cognitive deficits documented on their MDS assessments, and both had Wander/elopement alarms (wander guard bracelets) in place and used daily. The facility’s elopement/wandering policy stated that residents who are incapable of adequately protecting themselves and unable to determine when they are at risk for harm by wandering out of the facility should be placed on the resident security system to ensure safety. On the day of the incident, video surveillance later reviewed by the Administrator showed that a visitor entered an exit door on the B Unit at approximately 6:20 PM. The two residents at risk for elopement approached the door, and the visitor held the door open, allowing them to walk out of the building. The residents were wearing wander guard bracelets, and when they exited, the door alarm sounded. A nurse responded immediately to the alarm, exited the facility, and went down the walkway but did not see the residents. Staff were then alerted that the residents were missing, and a facility-wide search was initiated. Staff interviews and the facility’s documentation confirmed that the residents had previously been observed walking together throughout the facility and approaching doors, including the exit door involved in the incident. The Administrator reported that review of the video showed the two residents had approached the same door together two or three times prior to the elopement event. Despite their known patterns of wandering, severe cognitive impairment, and prior door-approach behavior, the residents were able to exit the facility unnoticed and unsupervised when the visitor held the door open. Staff ultimately located the residents across a four-lane high-capacity highway approximately 528 feet from the exit door and returned them to the facility, where body audits and assessments documented no injuries and intermittent confusion. The State Agency determined that the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of these residents, who had exhibited exit-seeking behaviors, placed them and other residents at risk for wandering and elopement in a situation likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death and cited the facility at F689 with Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care. The residents’ medical records and elopement reports documented that both were confused, had impaired memory, and were identified as wanderers. One resident had a BIMS score of 3 and the other a BIMS score of 0, both indicating severe cognitive deficits. Progress notes and elopement reports recorded that staff were notified when the residents were not on the unit and could not be located, that all staff were engaged in searching, and that the residents were ultimately found outside and assisted back into the building. Interviews with CNAs and an LPN described hearing a Code W called, running outside, and seeing the residents across the street after they had crossed the four-lane highway. The DON acknowledged that the residents were always walking in the facility, often together, and that they had wandered to doors and looked out, and agreed that increased monitoring and not allowing visitors to have door codes could have prevented the residents from leaving the building.
Removal Plan
- Conducted a facility search.
- Notified police of missing residents.
- Director of Nursing interviewed staff and residents.
- Notified the Medical Director and residents’ families.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing checked the wander guard system and facility doors to ensure proper functioning.
- Returned Resident #1 and Resident #2 to the facility.
- Completed an incident report.
- Completed an emergency Quality Assurance meeting.
- Initiated in-service training for all staff on the elopement policy, including a quiz to validate comprehension, and required staff (including contract staff) to complete the in-service before working their next scheduled shift, with Administrator monitoring compliance.
- Responded immediately to the door alarm by sending staff outside to locate residents and notifying additional staff to assist with the search.
- Reviewed video surveillance and confirmed a visitor held the door open allowing residents to exit.
- Held an emergency Quality Assurance meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Administrator, Regional Director, involved staff, and Infection Preventionist.
- Changed the main entry door code.
- Verified entrance door signage was in place instructing not to allow residents to exit unaccompanied.
- Identified residents at risk for elopement and ensured elopement bracelets/transmitters were functional and doors were locking appropriately.
- Reviewed care plans for residents at risk for elopement.
- Completed body audits on Resident #1 and Resident #2.
- Conducted audits verifying resident location, elopement risk, and wander guard bracelet function.
- Medical Records updated care profiles of residents at risk for wandering.
- Assistant Administrator began audits of all doors for function and security.
- Provided in-services on elopement policy and procedure, Resident Rights, and incident and accident reporting.
- Conducted elopement drills on each shift.
- Implemented monitoring systems to sustain compliance.
- Director of Nursing to monitor wander guard system checks three times weekly for four weeks or until substantial compliance is attained.
- Director of Nursing to monitor resident behavior for elopement attempts via incident reports, observations, and communications weekly for four weeks or until substantial compliance is attained.
- Quality Assurance Committee to meet for four weeks to review compliance with the plan of action, then continue routine Quality Assurance monitoring if no further concerns are noted.
- Administrator to hold follow-up Quality Assurance meetings monthly for two months then quarterly thereafter to ensure sustained compliance.
- Updated entry screening kiosk to include an additional reminder and attestation to ensure resident safety, requiring visitors to agree that no resident comes in or out with them and triggering a staff alert if the visitor refuses.
- Administration spoke directly with the visitor to confirm visitor policies and procedures.
Elopement of Cognitively Impaired Resident Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident with a history of wandering from exiting the building unattended. The resident had diagnoses including dementia with agitation and a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had been readmitted from a geriatric psychiatric hospitalization and was known by the DON to have a history of wandering. Despite this, the interdisciplinary team had previously determined that the resident was not at risk for elopement, and no elopement interventions such as a wander guard were in place at the time of the incident. On the day of the event, a visitor observed the resident standing near the front door and exited the facility without realizing the resident followed him outside. Staff later became aware that the resident was missing, and an LPN assisted in locating the resident. A CNA ultimately found the resident outside on the front porch and returned the resident to the facility, with the investigation determining the resident had been outside unattended for approximately five minutes. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident ambulated in the halls and had not previously attempted to exit the building, and that the resident was only reassessed and provided with a wander guard after the incident.
Failure to Care Plan for Pressure Injuries and Treatment Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with pressure injuries. The facility’s undated Care Plan Policy and Procedure stated that each resident’s care plan would remain current and inform staff of needs, strengths, goals, and approaches, and that a comprehensive person-centered care plan would be completed as needed. Record review showed that the resident was admitted with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma and, per the Discharge MDS with an ARD of 1/19/26, had a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Section M of the MDS documented two unstageable pressure injuries presenting as deep tissue injuries (DTIs). Physician orders dated 12/10/25 directed treatment to right and left DTI pressure ulcers. Despite these documented DTIs and treatment orders, review of the resident’s comprehensive care plan revealed no care plan addressing the DTIs on the left and right heels, which was inconsistent with the physician orders. During interviews, two LPNs responsible for MDS and care plan completion confirmed that the care plan did not include the DTIs and stated that care plans are developed based on the MDS and physician orders, and that audits comparing orders to care plans are done periodically but this had been missed. The DON stated her expectation that the wound care nurse update the care plan with new wound care treatment orders. An RN reported she could update care plan interventions but had not been trained to develop a new focused care plan and had not added the physician’s DTI treatment orders to the care plan, and she was not aware it was her responsibility to do so.
Unsecured Controlled Medication Left Unattended and Lost
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident property when a controlled substance prescribed for a resident was left unattended and subsequently went missing. Facility policies on abuse and neglect defined misappropriation of resident property to include missing prescription medications or diversion of resident medications, including controlled substances, and the Medication-Controlled Substances policy required that only authorized licensed nursing and pharmacy personnel have access to controlled medications, that all controlled substances be stored in a locked cabinet or compartment, and that accurate accountability of all controlled drugs be maintained. Despite these policies, a pharmacy courier delivered thirty Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10-325 mg tablets for a resident with a left femur fracture, and the medication was signed for by an LPN but was not signed onto the narcotic accountability record, was not documented on the narcotic box package count, and could not be located. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had a physician’s order for Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen, was later informed that the tablets delivered had been lost. Interviews revealed that one LPN received the blister pack of thirty Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen tablets from another LPN and placed it on the nurses’ station before leaving the area, leaving the controlled medication unattended. Both LPNs reported being in the medication room while the medication remained unattended at the nurses’ station. The DON reported being notified that the medication was missing and that an investigation confirmed the medication could not be located and had been left unattended, and the Administrator confirmed staff failed to ensure controlled medications were secured and accessible only to authorized personnel and that the facility was unable to determine the location of the missing medication.
Failure to Secure Controlled Drugs and Follow Refrigerated Storage Requirements
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to store and secure medications, including controlled substances, in accordance with professional standards and manufacturer instructions. For Resident #1, who was admitted with a left femur fracture and was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, the physician ordered Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg tablets. A facility investigation documented that a pharmacy courier delivered 30 tablets of this controlled medication, which were received and signed for by an LPN but were never documented in the narcotic count system and were later unable to be located. One LPN reported that after receiving the Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen from another LPN, she left the medication unattended at the nurses’ station while she completed other tasks instead of immediately securing it in the locked medication cart. The LPN who initially received the medication from the courier confirmed that the controlled medication had not been immediately secured in the locked cart following delivery. For Resident #3, who was admitted with heart disease and had a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition, the physician ordered Lorazepam (Ativan) oral concentrate. The narcotic record showed that two containers of Lorazepam were signed into the narcotic record on the date of admission. Manufacturer prescribing information for the Lorazepam oral concentrate specified that it must be protected from light and stored refrigerated at 36–46°F. During a controlled drug count, surveyors observed that two bottles of Lorazepam oral concentrate for this resident were stored in the locked medication cart rather than in a refrigerator, despite the label instructions requiring refrigeration. One LPN confirmed the manufacturer’s storage instructions on the label but was unsure why the medication had not been refrigerated, and another LPN acknowledged awareness that the medication required refrigeration but confirmed it had been stored in the medication cart instead of the designated medication refrigerator.
Failure to Provide Required Involuntary Discharge Notice and Appeal Rights
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide required written notice of an involuntary discharge, including appeal rights, and to obtain a physician’s discharge order before refusing readmission of a resident following a hospital transfer. Facility policy titled “Transfer Form” stated that it is the policy of the facility to provide a completed and accurate transfer form to residents transferred or discharged from the facility, and the policy titled “Appealing a Transfer or Discharge Notice” stated that residents have the right to appeal transfer or discharge notices and, upon notice of transfer or discharge, will be provided with a statement of their right to appeal. Record review showed that the resident, admitted with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, left the facility by facility van to be admitted to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation. Progress notes dated several days after the transfer documented that the resident had been discharged from the facility due to aggressive behavior and that, per conversation with the psychiatric hospital, the Administrator and Social Services Director would assist in finding alternative placement and home health if needed. Documentation further indicated that, due to threats made, the facility stated it was unable to meet the resident’s needs and communicated with the resident’s family that the resident would not be allowed to return. During interview, the Administrator confirmed that neither the resident nor the family was provided a formal involuntary discharge notice or information on appeal rights and that no physician order for discharge could be located, acknowledging that the formal notice, appeal rights, and physician order should have been obtained prior to discharge.
Failure to Investigate and Resolve Ongoing Food-Related Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that grievances voiced through the Resident Council regarding food quality and temperature were thoroughly investigated, addressed, and resolved. Resident Council minutes over multiple months documented repeated complaints that weekend food was "bad," tasted sweet, and that food was cold by the time it reached residents. Additional concerns included insufficient ice in water and tea, hard breakfast biscuits and toast, and cold grits. Although the facility’s grievance policy stated that residents and families could voice grievances without reprisal and that the facility would make prompt efforts to resolve grievances, there was no documentation that the initial complaint about weekend food quality was addressed, and subsequent complaints continued without evidence of thorough investigation or resolution. Resident Council Department Response Forms showed limited actions, such as placing food in containers to maintain temperature, conducting an in‑service for dietary staff, sending food out faster, and instructing staff to pass trays promptly, but there was no documentation of monitoring, follow‑up, or evaluation of whether these measures were effective. Residents interviewed, all cognitively intact per their MDS BIMS scores, consistently reported that the food remained cold and did not taste good, with one resident noting that staff would reheat food only if requested. The Dietary Manager acknowledged awareness of the complaints and stated he had spoken with weekend staff and made changes like replacing tray carts and providing guidance on food preparation, but confirmed there was no documentation of ongoing monitoring or additional interventions. Social Services and the Administrator both acknowledged awareness of the complaints and that additional follow‑up and resolution efforts should have occurred, yet no evidence of such follow‑up was present in the records.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



