Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Compere Nh Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment was found in bed with a flat sheet tied across her torso from side rail to side rail, restricting movement without a physician order. An RN removed the sheet and found no injury or distress. The CNA later stated she used the sheet to keep the resident from getting out of bed while staff were rounding, and the DON confirmed the resident’s care plan addressed supervision and fall prevention without restraints.
A resident with DM2 and OA stated she wanted alternate meal choices but did not know any were available and believed she had to eat whatever was served. Surveyors found that the daily menu and alternate meal options were not displayed on hallway TVs or on channel 2 of a resident room TV, and staff said they relied on those displays to inform residents of meal choices. The Dietary Manager and Administrator acknowledged that alternate menu options had not been consistently communicated and should be clearly posted so residents are aware of their choices.
Alternative meal choices were not posted on hallway and room TVs, and a resident said she was unaware of any options and thought she had to eat whatever was served. The Dietary Mgr acknowledged the alternates were omitted from the posted menus, staff relied on the TV postings for meal info, and the resident had Type 2 DM, osteoarthritis, and a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.
Food storage was not maintained in accordance with professional standards when surveyors found expired buttermilk, undated peeled eggs, wilted lettuce with an unclear handwritten date, and moisture in the flour bin during a kitchen observation. The DM acknowledged the findings and stated he was responsible for maintaining food quality standards, while the Administrator also recognized the issue.
Surveyors observed improper food storage and labeling, including expired produce, undated items, and exposed foods, as well as unsanitary meal preparation practices such as using a soapy towel to wipe a plate and placing a scoop handle directly into food. The Certified Dietary Manager and other staff acknowledged these deficiencies in food safety and sanitation.
The facility failed to accurately code MDS assessments for multiple residents, incorrectly documenting the administration of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and hypnotic medications. Despite residents receiving antiplatelet and hypnotic drugs, the MDS reflected administration of anticoagulants or omitted the correct drug classes. Staff interviews confirmed the errors were due to inaccurate review and coding of medical records, and there was no triple-check system in place to verify MDS accuracy.
A resident with muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and moderate cognitive impairment was observed to have long facial hair that she wished to have removed, but did not receive necessary grooming assistance from her assigned CNA during ADL care. Staff interviews confirmed that grooming, including facial hair removal, is part of CNA responsibilities, but this care was not provided as required by facility policy.
Unauthorized Sheet Used as a Physical Restraint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from the use of a physical restraint when a flat sheet was tied from one side rail to the other across the resident’s torso while she was in bed. The resident had diagnoses of dementia, hypertension, and anxiety, and the most recent MDS indicated no BIMS score, severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, and dependence for bed mobility, surface-to-surface transfers, and all activities of daily living. According to the incident and investigation records, an RN observed the resident restrained in bed with the sheet secured across her body. The sheet was removed immediately, and the resident was assessed with no injury or distress. The facility’s investigation identified that the restraint had been applied by a CNA during the night shift after the resident was transferred from a geri recliner to bed. The CNA stated she folded a flat sheet and tied it to the quarter side rails across the resident’s torso to keep her from getting out of bed while staff were rounding on other residents, and she acknowledged that it was a restraint. The resident did not have a physician’s order for any restraint, and the DON confirmed that the resident’s care plan addressed supervision and assistance for safety and fall prevention without the use of restraints. The facility records also show that the CNA was terminated for the unauthorized use of a physical restraint and violation of resident rights, and the Administrator and DON stated that the action violated facility policy and resident rights.
Failure to Inform Residents of Alternate Meal Choices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were informed of available alternate meal choices, limiting their ability to make informed choices regarding dining preferences for one resident interviewed about meal options. Resident #46 stated she wanted alternate meal choices but was unaware any alternatives were available and believed she had to eat whatever meal was served. The resident’s record showed admission with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes without Complications and Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, and the quarterly MDS dated 3/12/26 showed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During interviews, the Dietary Manager stated the daily menu and alternate meal options should be displayed on hallway televisions and on channel two of resident room televisions. However, during a joint review with the State Agency, the hallway television did not display alternate meal choices, and a resident room television on channel two also did not show alternate meal selections. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the omission and stated alternate meal choices should be displayed with the daily menu. The Dietary Manager later stated residents have a right to food choices and should know the daily selections, and acknowledged alternate menu options had not been consistently communicated to residents. CNA #1 stated dietary staff did not verbally communicate alternate meal options to nursing staff and that staff relied on television menu information to inform residents of available meal choices. The Administrator stated alternate meal options should be clearly posted because food choices are important to resident comfort and quality of life, and acknowledged residents should be able to see available menu options so they are aware of their choices.
Alternative meal choices were not posted for residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident alternative menus were posted and matched resident preferences for one resident who expressed a desire for alternate meals. During an interview, the resident stated she was unaware of any alternative options and believed she had to eat whatever was served to her. The facility's [NAME] of Rights booklet stated that residents have the right to live and receive care in a residential setting that is homelike. During interviews with the Dietary Manager, the manager explained that the daily menu and alternate options should be displayed on the hallway television and on channel two in resident bedrooms. However, a joint review with the State Agency found that the hallway television did not display any alternate meal choices, and a random resident's bedroom television also omitted the alternate choices. The Dietary Manager stated he was unaware of the omission and acknowledged that alternates should be displayed with the main meal choices. The Dietary Manager later stated that residents have a right to food choices and should know those selections daily, and acknowledged that alternative menu options had not been consistently communicated. A CNA stated staff were not verbally informed by dietary of meal options and relied on what was posted on the televisions. The Administrator acknowledged that alternate menu options must be clearly posted so residents are aware of their rights and choices. The resident involved had diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes without Complications and Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, and a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.
Food Storage Not Maintained in Accordance With Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During a kitchen observation, surveyors found an opened 1/2-gallon fat free buttermilk in the refrigerator with a best-if-used-by date of 5/31/26, an opened bag of lettuce with visible brown and wilted lettuce and a handwritten date of 6/3/26 with no indication of what the date meant, and a pan of nine peeled, pre-boiled eggs with no date. In the dry storage area, the flour bin had blotches of moisture in the flour. The Dietary Manager was interviewed at the time of the tour and stated he had been made aware of the expired food, undated food, and moisture in the flour bin. He stated that he was ultimately responsible for maintaining food quality standards in the kitchen and identified bacterial growth as the hazard associated with expired foods, undated foods, and moisture in dry bins. The Administrator later acknowledged the findings and stated that the Dietary Manager was responsible for maintaining food quality in the kitchen.
Deficient Food Storage, Labeling, and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain food quality and safety in accordance with professional standards, as evidenced by multiple observations of improper food storage, labeling, and handling. Surveyors found undated and unlabeled beverage cups in the refrigerator, expired and deteriorating produce, and a personal-sized bowl of food in the freezer without identification. In the pantry, overly ripe bananas with open skins and bottles of dry seasoning with open lids were observed. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) acknowledged the presence of expired, undated, and exposed food items and confirmed responsibility for food quality and safety. Additionally, unsanitary meal preparation practices were observed, including a staff member placing a scoop handle directly into pureed bread and repeatedly using it, and another staff member using a soapy towel from the dishwashing area to wipe a resident's plate before serving. Both staff members acknowledged these actions, and the CDM confirmed witnessing the infractions. The facility's administrator was made aware of these issues and stated that the CDM is responsible for kitchen sanitation and food quality.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for High-Risk Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for six residents regarding the administration of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and hypnotic medications. According to the facility's policy and the CMS RAI Manual, the MDS must reflect all high-risk drug classes administered during the seven-day look-back period. However, review of medical records, physician orders, and medication administration records (MARs) revealed discrepancies between the medications actually administered and those coded on the MDS. Specifically, residents who received antiplatelet medications such as Plavix and Aspirin, and hypnotic medications like Temazepam (Restoril), were incorrectly coded as having received anticoagulants or not coded for hypnotics or antiplatelets as appropriate. For example, several residents had active orders and received administration of antiplatelet medications, but their MDS assessments indicated receipt of anticoagulants instead, with no documentation of anticoagulant administration. In other cases, hypnotic medications were administered but not coded on the MDS. The review of the MARs and physician orders confirmed that the medications administered did not match the MDS coding for these drug classes. This pattern was consistent across all six residents reviewed, each with varying diagnoses such as cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, insomnia, and peripheral vascular disease. Interviews with facility staff, including the RN responsible for completing Section N of the MDS, confirmed that the errors were due to inaccurate coding. The RN acknowledged that information is gathered from medical records, but the assessments were not accurately reflecting the medications administered. The DON and Administrator were also aware of the inaccuracies and confirmed that there was no triple-check system in place to ensure the accuracy of MDS coding, relying instead on staff to code accurately based on their review of records.
Failure to Provide Necessary Grooming Assistance for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) did not receive necessary assistance with grooming and personal hygiene. The resident was observed on two separate occasions to have long, white hairs on her chin, which she expressed a desire to have removed. Despite her requests, the facial hair was not addressed during routine care visits. The resident reported that her assigned Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) had not offered grooming assistance, and the CNA later acknowledged seeing the facial hair but had not yet taken action to remove it. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that it is the CNA's responsibility to assist residents with grooming, including trimming facial hair, as part of ADL care. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the CNA should have addressed the facial hair immediately upon noticing it. The resident's records indicated she had muscle weakness, unspecified lack of coordination, and a moderately impaired cognitive status, further supporting her need for assistance with personal care. The facility's policy also emphasized the importance of treating residents with dignity and attending to their personal needs.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 106 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Jackson
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methodist Sepcialty Care Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Lakeland Community Care Center | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Alyce G Clarke Center For Medically Fragile Childr | 2.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Manhattan Community Care Center | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Pine Forest Health And Rehabilitation | 4.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Compere Nh Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.