Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at St Elizabeth Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Meals were served bland, visually unappetizing, and below proper temp. Residents reported the food had no flavor, looked unappealing, and often arrived cold, with some using personal sauces and seasonings to make meals edible. Observations showed white rice, cauliflower, and chicken served on white plates, and hot items such as pureed foods, pork chop, and green beans were measured well below expected serving temps. Dietary staff said recipes were not followed and food was not tasted before service.
Food storage, prep, and serving practices were not maintained according to policy. Kitchen observations found uncovered trash cans, a scoop stored in flour, an unclean meat slicer, undated bulk breadcrumbs, and heavy buildup behind the ice machine. A DM prepared pureed foods for a resident without measuring portions or reheating them, and the food was served at low temperatures. Other residents also received lunch trays with pork chop and vegetable temperatures below the facility’s stated hot-food standard, and residents reported that meals were often cold.
Incomplete Water Management Program and Unsanitary Ice Machine Drain: Facility staff failed to develop and implement complete water system inspection, testing, and maintenance procedures to reduce Legionella risk. The Water Management Plan lacked a facility-specific risk assessment, control measures, corrective actions, and documentation of annual water sampling, and records showed only one Legionella test was completed. During survey, the ice machine drain was found without an air gap and with heavy black and brown slimy buildup; the maintenance director was unfamiliar with the air gap requirement, did not routinely inspect behind the ice machine, and had only tested one water sample by dipstick.
Incomplete MDS Section F Activity Assessments: Facility staff failed to complete accurate MDS activity preference interviews for eight residents. Although several residents were documented as cognitively intact and had Activity Interest Surveys listing preferences such as music, shopping, reading, socials, outings, and movies, Section F was marked no response or non-responsive. Staff interviews showed confusion over who was responsible for Section F, and the DON, ADON, SSD, activity director, and MDS Coordinator all described that interviewable residents should have been interviewed or at least attempted.
Incomplete and Non-Updated Care Plans: Staff failed to keep resident care plans current and measurable. Several residents had documented activity preferences, dementia, chronic UTIs, hospice status, and mental health diagnoses/antipsychotic use in the record, but those needs were not reflected in the care plans. Interviews with CNA, RN, ADON, DON, and the administrator confirmed the missing information should have been included to guide resident care.
Residents did not receive a consistent weekend activity program to meet their interests and psychosocial needs. Multiple residents said there were no staff-led activities on weekends and that they spent time watching TV, coloring, reading, or staying in their rooms. Staff, including the AD, DON, RN, NA, and administrator, confirmed that weekend activities were limited to coloring pages, occasional games if aides had time, and church services, with no scheduled staff member responsible for leading activities.
Failure to Follow Standardized Recipes, Portions, and Food Temperatures: Staff did not prepare and serve menu items according to standardized recipes, portion sizes, or required temperatures. A resident on a pureed diet was served thin, unmeasured pureed foods that were not reheated after processing, and the DM stated the items should have been reheated but were not because he/she was in a hurry. The cook also served rice and cauliflower without required recipe ingredients, and staff acknowledged they did not follow the recipes.
Facility staff failed to deliver resident mail on Saturdays, violating residents' rights to receive unopened mail. The activities department is responsible for mail distribution, but there was confusion about weekend delivery. The activity director and administrator confirmed mail is not delivered on weekends due to contraband checks, suggesting an RN could distribute mail instead.
The facility failed to update care plans for several residents, resulting in unaddressed needs such as PTSD triggers, hospice care, and dental issues. Observations and interviews revealed a lack of awareness among staff about the importance of care plan updates, with new staff still acclimating to their roles.
The facility failed to maintain professional standards by not accurately transcribing physician's orders for several residents, leading to discrepancies in medication administration and incomplete orders for hospice services. A resident's Divalproex Sodium order was not updated, causing confusion about the correct dosage. Another resident's Nystatin order lacked the route of administration, and three residents receiving hospice care did not have corresponding physician orders. The DON acknowledged the responsibility for ensuring accurate eMARs and complete orders.
The facility failed to obtain informed consent for bed rail use for two residents, despite policy requirements. Both residents, who were cognitively intact and independent with ADLs, were observed using bed rails without documented consent. Interviews revealed that the DON and Administrator were unaware of the missing consents, although they acknowledged the necessity of obtaining them prior to installation.
Facility staff failed to properly sanitize blood glucose monitors for multiple residents, contrary to the facility's infection control policy. A CMT did not adequately cover the glucometer's collection strip insertion site with disinfectant wipes for the required time, and in one case, did not disinfect the device at all. Interviews confirmed these lapses, despite staff training on proper procedures.
Facility staff failed to educate and offer the COVID-19 vaccine to residents, as required by CDC guidelines. Medical records for several residents lacked documentation of vaccination consent or declination. Interviews with the Infection Preventionist and administrator revealed no policy or educational efforts regarding COVID-19 vaccinations, citing remote location as a barrier.
A resident with PTSD and other mental health conditions was subjected to verbal and emotional abuse by a CNA who refused to leave the resident's room despite repeated requests. The CNA blocked the doorway, threatened the resident, and engaged in a verbal altercation, causing the resident to feel trapped and unsafe. Witnesses confirmed the CNA's inappropriate behavior, and the facility's administration recognized the need for an abuse investigation.
Facility staff failed to report an allegation of emotional abuse involving a CNA and a resident to the DHSS within the required two-hour timeframe. The incident involved the CNA refusing to leave the resident's room, leading to a confrontation. Despite staff awareness of reporting requirements, the DON and administrator did not report the incident promptly, treating it as a behavioral issue instead.
Meals Served Bland and Below Proper Temperature
Penalty
Summary
Food and drink were not kept palatable, attractive, or at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility’s dietary policy required staff to taste food before serving, serve food at proper temperatures, and follow standard recipes, including seasoning foods according to the recipes. During lunch observation in the 200-hall dining room, residents used mustard, sugar packets, and individual sauce packets to season their meals, and multiple plates containing cauliflower and rice were discarded after residents finished eating. Several residents stated the food was bland, had no flavor, or did not look edible, and one resident said he or she brought personal sauces and seasonings from the room because staff made the food plain. Observations showed meals were served in a visually unappetizing manner, including white rice, white cauliflower, and white chicken on a white plate, with one resident eating only about 10% of the meal and pushing the plate away. Another resident received a similar white meal and asked for seasoning, and staff sought permission from another resident to use that resident’s personal seasonings. A dietary staff member stated he or she prepared rice and cauliflower but did not season the food according to the recipes, knew where the recipes were located, and did not follow them. The staff member also said he or she did not taste the food. Hot food temperatures were below the facility’s stated expectations. Pureed chicken and cauliflower were observed at 106 degrees F and 114 degrees F before being served, and other residents received pork chop and green beans at temperatures of 95.7 degrees F, 99.2 degrees F, 108.9 degrees F, and 109 degrees F in both the dining room and resident rooms. Residents stated their food was usually cold when delivered to their rooms. The dietary manager said staff should follow recipes, had not been keeping up with training and monitoring new staff, did not know staff were not following recipes, and did not taste the food. The administrator stated the dietary manager and kitchen staff were responsible for following standard recipes and was not aware of how many residents did not like the food.
Food Storage, Preparation, and Temperature Control Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Food was not stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards. During the initial kitchen tour, two trash cans in the kitchen were uncovered and not in use, a scoop was stored in a bin of flour, the back side of the meat slicer had an accumulation of grease and small pieces of meat, a large bin of breadcrumbs in dry storage was not dated, and the area behind the ice machine contained a large amount of black material. The Dietary Manager stated trash cans should be covered when not in use, scoops should not be stored in bins, foods in bulk bins should be dated, and he/she was responsible for the meat slicer and kitchen cleanliness. Food preparation and serving practices also did not follow the facility's dietary policy. The Dietary Manager prepared pureed chicken, rice, and cauliflower for a resident, placed unmeasured portions on a divided plate, and put the plate in a warming cabinet after each item was prepared. The pureed items were not reheated after processing, and the temperatures of the pureed chicken and cauliflower were 106 degrees F and 114 degrees F when they were placed on a service cart to be served. The Dietary Manager stated the pureed items should have been reheated to 165 degrees F or according to the recipe and said he/she was in a hurry to get the resident's food back. Resident meal temperatures were also below the facility's stated serving temperature. A resident received a lunch tray in the dining room with a pork chop temperature of 99.2 degrees F. Two other residents received lunch trays in their rooms with pork chop temperatures of 95.7 degrees F and green bean temperatures of 108.9 degrees F and 109 degrees F. One resident said the food is always cold, and another said the food is usually not hot when staff gets it to the room. The maintenance director did not know what an air gap was and did not know the ice machine drain required one; the drain was covered by a dried washcloth and led to a larger drain without an air gap, with black and brown slimy material present. The administrator stated the Dietary Manager and kitchen staff were responsible for kitchen cleanliness and proper food temperatures, and the maintenance director was responsible for the area behind the ice machine.
Incomplete Water Management Program and Unsanitary Ice Machine Drain
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for inspection, testing, and maintenance of the facility’s water systems to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens. Review of the facility’s Water Management Plan showed it did not contain a facility-specific risk assessment, control measures for identified risk areas, corrective actions if control measures were not within specified ranges, or documentation of ten annual water samples completed during water system testing. Review of the facility’s Legionella sampling plan showed annual testing of the hot and cold-water distribution systems was required, with samples from at least five outlets on each system during each annual cycle. Record review for February 2025 through February 2026 showed only one Legionella test was performed, by the maintenance director on 01/09/26. During the Life Safety Code tour, the ice machine drain was covered by a dried washcloth; when removed, the drain was found to lead to a larger white plastic drain without an air gap and with a large accumulation of black and brown slimy material. The floor behind the ice machine, including a dish bin and sump pump type device, also contained large amounts of a black substance. The maintenance director stated he/she was not sure what an air gap was, did not know the ice machine drain required one, did not routinely inspect behind the ice machine, was not familiar with a facility-specific risk assessment, did not perform routine water flushes or system checks, and had only tested one water sample by dipstick. The administrator stated the water management plan was written by corporate staff, had been received that week, and that he/she was not familiar with the plan or aware that it directed staff to test ten water samples.
Incomplete MDS Section F Activity Assessments
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to document complete and accurate MDS Section F assessments for eight sampled residents when the activity preferences portion was not completed in accordance with the facility policy. The policy stated Section F is to be completed by the Activity Director and is intended to allow the resident to determine his or her own preferences for daily activities. For Residents #1, #4, #9, #34, #41, #43, and #44, the annual MDSs documented the residents as cognitively intact or, for one resident, moderately cognitively impaired, yet Section F was marked as no response or non-responsive to all interview questions. Record review showed each of those residents had an Activity Interest Survey completed by staff that identified specific interests and preferences, including shopping, music, crafts, reading, socials, going out to eat, movies, parties, cook outs, scenic drives, bible study, bingo, volunteering, and other activities. Despite those documented preferences, the MDS assessments did not reflect resident interviews or responses in Section F. For Resident #18, the annual MDS stated the resident was rarely understood and no activity interview was documented, but the Activity Interest Survey listed multiple interests such as baseball, football, cannabis, music, movies, social events, and outings. During interviews, the SSD stated Resident #18 was interviewable and the MDS Coordinator had documented the resident as not interviewable. The ADON stated all eight residents were interviewable and should have been interviewed for Section F, and the DON stated that if a resident is interviewable, the resident should be interviewed for cognition and activity preferences. The activity director said he or she did not complete Section F, the DON said the regional MDS Coordinator was responsible for the activity portion, and the MDS Coordinator said he or she did not complete Section F because he or she was told not to, although all residents should be interviewed for Section F or at least an attempt should be made.
Incomplete and Non-Updated Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to develop comprehensive care plans with measurable goals, time frames, and interventions that reflected residents’ assessed needs, and failed to update existing care plans after changes in condition or treatment. The facility policy required person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and time frames, reviewed and revised after comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessments, and bedside care plans updated with pertinent information for nursing staff. For one resident, staff documented activity interests on an Activity Interest Survey, including shopping, coloring, crafts, smoking, reading, socials, going out to eat, movie theater outings, parties, BBQ/cookouts, and scenic drives, but the annual MDS documented intact cognition and did not include activity preferences, and the care plan did not reflect those interests. For another resident, staff documented moderately impaired cognition and a diagnosis of dementia on the SCSA, but the care plan did not include dementia or interventions. Staff interviews confirmed that CNA, RN, ADON, DON, and the administrator expected dementia to be on the care plan, and the DON and ADON were responsible for updating care plans. For a resident with a history of recurrent UTIs and urinary retention, the record showed prophylactic antibiotic use, treatment for UTI, and cranberry supplementation, but the care plan did not address the chronic UTIs or related interventions. Another resident was admitted to hospice, but the care plan was not updated to reflect hospice status. Additional residents had documented activity preferences on surveys, including sports, music, movies, social events, smoking, reading, shopping, scenic drives, and outings, but those preferences were not included on their care plans. One resident with anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, PTSD, and antipsychotic medication use also had a care plan that did not contain direction or guidance for those diagnoses or medication use. Staff interviews repeatedly confirmed that these diagnoses, treatments, and activity preferences should have been included on the care plans, but they were not.
Weekend Activity Program Not Provided
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide an ongoing activity program on weekends that was designed to meet residents’ interests and support their mental and psychosocial well-being. The deficiency involved eleven sampled residents, including residents who stated they liked activities, wanted more weekend activities, or would participate if offered. Several residents reported that on weekends they mostly stayed in their rooms, watched television, colored, or read because there were no staff-led activities available. The facility’s activity policy stated that residents are to be provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet their interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. However, review of the January and February 2026 activity calendars showed only limited weekend items such as sit and be fit, deep clean room, journal prompt, and Bible study. During interviews, residents repeatedly stated that activities were not offered on weekends, that there was nothing to do other than watch television, and that they wished more activities were available. One resident said the second Sunday of the month a church group comes in, but otherwise weekend activities were not offered. Staff interviews confirmed that there were no scheduled staff-led weekend activities. The activity director stated there were no group-led activities on weekends and that it was hard to depend on others to do activities because the AD did not work weekends. Nursing staff and nurse aides stated that weekend activities were limited to coloring pages, occasional games if aides had time, and church services when available, and that no staff member was scheduled or responsible for completing activities with residents on weekends. The administrator also stated there were not staff-led activities on weekends and acknowledged there should be activities on the weekends.
Failure to Follow Standardized Recipes, Portions, and Food Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to serve and prepare food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated recipes and menus. The facility’s Dietary Food Preparation policy required standardized recipes, uniform portions, proper serving temperatures, and use of pureed recipes for pureed diets. The Week Four, Day 25 lunch menu specified pureed portions for residents receiving pureed meals, including pureed chicken, mushroom rice, au gratin cauliflower, and frosted cake. During observation, a resident receiving a pureed meal was served three off-white pureed items that were thin in consistency and contained visible liquid, and the Dietary Manager removed the plate from the resident. During interview, the cook stated he/she did not follow the standardized recipe when preparing the pureed items and did not really know how to prepare pureed food items. The Dietary Manager then prepared pureed chicken, rice, and cauliflower in a food processor and placed unmeasured portions on a divided plate, washing the processor between items. The items were placed in a warming cabinet after each item was prepared, but were not reheated after pureeing; the pureed chicken was 106 degrees F and the pureed cauliflower was 114 degrees F when placed on a service cart. The Dietary Manager stated the pureed items should have been reheated to 165 degrees F or according to the recipe, but said he/she was in a hurry. Review of the standardized recipes also showed mushroom rice should include mushrooms and cauliflower au gratin should include cheddar cheese and a breadcrumb topping, but observation showed the rice was served without mushrooms and the cauliflower was served without cheese or breadcrumb topping. The cook stated he/she knew where the recipes were located but did not follow them.
Failure to Deliver Resident Mail on Saturdays
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure residents received their mail on Saturdays, which is a violation of the residents' rights to privacy in written communications. The facility's policy, revised in July 2023, states that residents have the right to send and promptly receive unopened mail. During a resident group meeting, residents reported that staff does not deliver their mail on Saturdays. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the activities department is responsible for distributing mail, but there was confusion about who delivers mail on Saturdays. The activity director stated that mail is not delivered on weekends because a department head must be present to check for contraband. The administrator confirmed that mail is not delivered on weekends and suggested that the RN on duty could distribute mail, but preferred a department head to handle packages due to contraband concerns.
Failure to Update Resident Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to review and revise the care plans for seven residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific needs. For Resident #4, the care plan did not include details about PTSD triggers, assistance required for personal hygiene, or the resident's unsteadiness and dizziness, despite a documented fall. Observations showed the resident was unsteady and experienced involuntary movements, yet these issues were not reflected in the care plan. Resident #31's care plan did not address the use of bed rails, although observations confirmed the presence of a bed rail, which the resident used due to their size and swollen legs. Similarly, Resident #34's care plan lacked information on hospice and ostomy care, even though hospice care had been initiated. Resident #40's care plan did not include dental issues, despite the resident having dental problems since August and undergoing a tooth extraction in January. Residents #42, #48, and #55 were on hospice care, but their care plans did not reflect this change. Interviews with staff, including the CNA, MDS Coordinator, DON, and the administrator, revealed a lack of awareness and understanding of the importance of updating care plans to reflect current resident needs. The MDS Coordinator and DON were new to their positions and were still acclimating, which contributed to the oversight in care plan updates.
Deficiencies in Transcribing Physician Orders and Hospice Coordination
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of care by not accurately transcribing and updating physician's orders for several residents. For Resident #10, the staff did not discontinue a previous order for Divalproex Sodium Direct Release 250 mg, which was supposed to be replaced by a new order for 500 mg. This discrepancy was not resolved, leading to confusion among staff about the correct dosage to administer. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the error and stated it was their responsibility to ensure the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) was accurate. Resident #20's physician order for Nystatin oral suspension lacked the route of administration, leaving staff uncertain whether the medication should be swallowed or spit out. The DON and the administrator both emphasized the importance of complete and accurate orders, with the responsibility falling on the nurse taking the order to clarify any missing information with the physician. This oversight in the order transcription process led to potential confusion in medication administration. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for hospice services for Residents #34, #42, and #55, despite documentation indicating they were receiving such services. Resident #34 also had an incomplete oxygen order without a specified flow rate. The DON stated that nurses are responsible for transcribing orders from hospital paperwork and obtaining clarification if needed. These deficiencies highlight a lack of coordination and communication in ensuring accurate and complete physician orders for residents receiving hospice care and other medical treatments.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Bed Rail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails for two residents, despite the facility's policy requiring such consent. Resident #31, who is cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living, was observed with a bed rail up on multiple occasions. The resident, diagnosed with traumatic brain injury, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia, did not have a documented informed consent for bed rail use in their medical record. The resident mentioned requesting the bed rail for assistance but could not recall being informed about the risks and benefits associated with its use. Similarly, Resident #48, also cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living, was observed using grab bars on both sides of the bed. The resident, with diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension, stroke, depression, and respiratory failure, did not have an informed consent documented for the use of bed rails. The resident stated that they requested the bed rails for assistance with repositioning and getting out of bed. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator revealed that they were unaware of the lack of consent documentation, despite acknowledging that consents should be signed before bed rail installation.
Improper Glucometer Disinfection Practices
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to adhere to infection control practices by not properly sanitizing the blood glucose monitor for four residents. The facility's policy requires glucometers to be cleaned and disinfected after each use with EPA-registered disinfectant wipes, ensuring the device remains visibly wet for one minute to achieve complete disinfection. However, observations revealed that a Certified Medication Technician (CMT) did not follow these procedures. The CMT loosely wrapped the glucometer with a disinfectant wipe, failing to cover the collection strip insertion site for the required duration, and in one instance, did not disinfect the glucometer at all before placing it back in the medication cart drawer. Interviews with the CMT and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the lapses in protocol. The CMT acknowledged the improper cleaning of the glucometer and admitted to not realizing the oversight in one instance. The DON and the facility administrator both stated that staff are expected to thoroughly cleanse the glucometer between each resident to prevent cross-contamination, and that all staff had received training on the proper disinfection procedures. Despite this, the observed practices did not align with the facility's infection control policy, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Educate and Offer COVID-19 Vaccination
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to educate and offer the COVID-19 vaccination to five residents, as required by the CDC guidelines for long-term care settings. The residents involved were both under and over the age of 65, and their medical records lacked documentation of COVID-19 vaccination consent or declination forms. There was no evidence that these residents received or refused the COVID-19 vaccine, indicating a lapse in the facility's vaccination protocol. Interviews with the Infection Preventionist and the administrator revealed that the facility did not provide COVID-19 education or vaccinations to residents. The Infection Preventionist, who started in July 2024, was unaware of any policy regarding COVID-19 vaccinations and cited the facility's remote location as a barrier to vaccine access. The administrator, also new to the position as of July 2024, confirmed the absence of a policy and the lack of educational efforts related to the COVID-19 vaccine.
Resident Subjected to Verbal and Emotional Abuse by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to protect a resident from verbal and emotional abuse by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA). The incident involved CNA E, who threatened to take the resident to the floor and refused to leave the resident's room despite repeated requests. The resident, who has intact cognition and a history of PTSD, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and depression, reported feeling trapped and unsafe when CNA E blocked the doorway and refused to leave. The resident's care plan emphasized the need for a safe environment free from perceived danger and highlighted the importance of calm interactions to prevent agitation. The facility's investigation revealed that CNA E and the resident engaged in a verbal altercation, with CNA E refusing to leave the room even after being instructed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) to do so. Witnesses, including another Nurse Aide and the LPN, confirmed that CNA E stood face to face with the resident and made comments that could further agitate the resident. The resident expressed feeling like a prisoner in their own room due to CNA E's actions. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON) and the administrator, indicated that CNA E's behavior was inappropriate and contributed to the resident's distress. The administrator acknowledged that the situation should have been investigated as abuse and noted that CNA E's actions could exacerbate the resident's agitation. Despite these acknowledgments, the report does not explicitly state whether CNA E's actions were officially classified as abuse.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to report an allegation of employee-to-resident emotional abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two-hour timeframe. The incident involved a resident who reported that a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) refused to leave their room after being asked multiple times and blocked the doorway. The situation escalated to yelling between the resident and the CNA, with the CNA standing abdomen to abdomen with the resident. Despite the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) instructing the CNA to leave, the CNA did not comply immediately. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified the following day, and the state agency was not informed within the mandated timeframe. Interviews revealed that staff members, including the Nursing Assistant (NA) and LPN, were aware of the two-hour reporting requirement for abuse allegations. However, the DON and the administrator were unclear about their responsibilities in reporting the incident to the state. The administrator admitted to investigating the incident as a behavioral issue rather than abuse and failed to report it to the state agency promptly. The administrator also mentioned consulting with a regional administrator but did not receive guidance in time to meet the reporting requirements.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 80 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Saint Elizabeth
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miller County Care And Rehabilitation Center | 9.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Maries Manor | 17.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Eldon Nursing & Rehab | 17.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
| Stonebridge Lake Ozark | 18.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Dixon Nursing & Rehab | 19.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for St Elizabeth Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.