Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Rock Point Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Unsanitary food storage and kitchen conditions. Surveyors observed dented cans in storage, heavy grime and food debris on the oven, dishwasher, sinks, floors, plumbing pipes, and counters, plus non-intact walls, holes, and dust- and substance-covered ceiling tiles and vents in food prep and dry storage areas. The Dietary Mgr and Admin stated the kitchen, walls, ceiling, vents, oven, dishwasher, and floors should be clean and intact, and dented cans should not be left on the racks.
Failure to Refund Resident Trust Funds After Death: Three residents expired with money still held in their resident trust accounts, and the balances were not refunded within 30 days. The BOM said ledger balances were reviewed for limits and that notices from the funeral home were normally received after a resident expired, while the Administrator said the trust ledger should be audited regularly and a TPL form should have been submitted to MO HealthNet for the remaining funds.
A facility failed to maintain a homelike environment on a locked behavior unit when meals were routinely served on plastic trays left on the table in front of residents, with staff and the Administrator stating this had been the unit’s usual practice for convenience and to manage territorial behavior. Surveyors also observed multiple cleanliness and maintenance issues, including stained ceiling tiles, grime buildup, non-intact caulking, a dirty shower chair, and standing water in an unlocked utility closet.
Two residents received antipsychotic meds without documented appropriate diagnoses, and one resident also had no documented GDR attempt. One resident was on Zyprexa for dementia-related behaviors despite records showing severe cognitive impairment and no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors, or rejection of care, while another resident was on quetiapine for anxiety and sleep disorder with no documentation supporting the diagnosis or a GDR attempt. The DON and Admin stated they would expect correct diagnoses and attempted GDRs when appropriate.
Missing Bed-Hold and Appeal Information in Transfer/Discharge Notices: The facility failed to include required bed-hold amounts, appeal rights, and Ombudsmen/advocacy contact information in transfer and discharge paperwork for four residents who were sent to the hospital. Records for multiple hospital transfers showed missing daily bed-hold rates, and some forms also lacked a selected bed-hold preference. An LPN said the sending nurse completed the paperwork, and the Administrator stated staff should fill in all required blanks.
Failure to Complete Baseline Care Plan on Admission: A resident was admitted without a baseline care plan being completed within 48 hours, and there was no documentation that a summary was provided to the resident or representative. An LPN acknowledged the care plan was not completed, while the MDS Coordinator, ADON, and DON stated the admitting nurse/charge nurse was responsible for completing and filing the baseline care plan in the chart.
Improper Urinary Catheter Bag Placement: Two residents with indwelling catheters had drainage bags and tubing observed resting on the floor, placed on the mattress, or raised above bladder level during care and transfers. The facility policy required the bag and tubing to stay off the floor and below the bladder, and staff interviews confirmed the bag should not be above the bladder or placed in bed with the resident.
A facility failed to ensure proper respiratory care for two residents. One resident with a trach/laryngectomy tube had no order for independent self-care or suctioning, no documented training or competency assessment, and the extra tube supply was kept in the ADON’s office rather than readily accessible. Another resident with COPD and O2 dependence was observed receiving O2 at a higher rate than ordered, with undated tubing and humidifier and improper storage of the nasal cannula and nebulizer mask when not in use.
Failure to Individualize Dementia Care Plans: The facility did not ensure individualized care plans addressed dementia-related needs and activities for three residents with documented dementia diagnoses and cognitive impairment. Care plans for these residents did not include specific dementia problems, interventions, or goals, while observations showed them lying in bed with eyes closed or sitting alone in their rooms/common area without engaged activity; the DON and Administrator stated dementia care should be individualized and address each resident’s diagnosis and needs.
Staff failed to follow infection control practices during wound care, suprapubic catheter care, and incontinent care. An LPN repeatedly continued care without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene while dressing a wound, handling a suprapubic catheter, and flushing the catheter. CNAs and NAs also missed hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinent care, used the same wipe area repeatedly, handled dirty items without hand hygiene, and one NA placed a nasal cannula from the floor back into a resident’s nostrils.
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment, affecting all 70 residents. Observations showed a deep crack in the dining room floor, missing baseboard trim, and exposed sheetrock. The Maintenance Supervisor and Administrator were aware of these issues, with no plans for repair.
The facility failed to attempt gradual dose reductions (GDR) for three residents on psychotropic medications, as required by their policy. These residents, with various mental health diagnoses, were prescribed medications like Paxil, quetiapine, and aripiprazole without documented GDR attempts or contraindications. Interviews revealed that GDRs were expected unless contraindicated, but the facility did not adhere to this policy.
The facility exceeded the acceptable medication error rate due to improper insulin administration for two residents. The CMT failed to prime the Fiasp insulin pen before each dose, contrary to manufacturer guidelines. The DON and Administrator confirmed the requirement to prime the pen before each dose.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during tube feeding and incontinent care for a resident. Despite EBP signage, staff did not wear gowns as required. An LPN and two nursing assistants provided care without gowns, contrary to the facility's policy. Interviews revealed a misunderstanding of EBP requirements, with the DON expecting compliance.
Unsanitary food storage and kitchen conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions. During observations of the kitchen, surveyors found one compartment and three-compartment sinks with hot water at 106 degrees Fahrenheit after one minute, two cookie sheets with dark brown carbon build-up, and a commercial gas range oven with excessive black grime build-up on the interior surfaces and floor beneath. The commercial dishwasher had flaky white grime build-up inside and outside with scattered debris on the floor beneath, and the floor, plumbing pipes, and electrical switch box below the dishwashing area counters had scattered debris, oily film, and brown grime build-up. Surveyors also observed an uncovered hole in the wall near the dishwasher plumbing accessories, a hole in the wall near the disposal area with a pink substance, and non-intact wall sections near the dining room entrance and closet door. Additional observations included an approximate 8-foot by 8-foot section of ceiling tiles and four plastic light fixture covers over the food preparation area counter and one-compartment sink with dust build-up and a dark brown substance, along with ceiling diffusers in the food preparation area and dry storage area with dust build-up and a brown substance. Two dented cans, including a 3-quart can of spinach and a 50-ounce can of cream of mushroom condensed soup, were also observed in storage. During interview, the Dietary Manager stated dented cans should not be left on the racks, the kitchen should be clean without food debris under appliances, shelves, and food counters, and the ceiling tiles and vents should be clean. The Administrator stated the kitchen walls should be intact and easy to clean, the ceiling and vents should be clean, the oven and dishwasher should be clean, the floor should not have food crumbs or debris, and there should not be grime or build-up on the tiles or plumbing pipes.
Failure to Refund Resident Trust Funds After Death
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to refund resident funds within 30 days after death for three residents. Review of the closed medical records showed that Resident #80 expired with $93.13 remaining in the resident trust fund account, Resident #81 expired with $1,683.73 remaining, and Resident #82 expired with $483.52 remaining. The facility maintained resident trust fund ledgers showing that each resident’s funds remained in the account well beyond the expected timeframe, with the balances still present 121 days, 168 days, and 142 days late, respectively. The facility’s policy stated that it maintained accounting records of resident funds and individual ledgers in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. During interview, the Business Office Manager stated that resident trust ledger balances were reviewed to ensure they were within the limit and that, when a resident expired, the facility was normally sent a notice from the funeral home about expenses. The Administrator stated that the resident trust ledger should be audited regularly to ensure no funds remained for residents who expired in the facility and that the facility should have submitted a TPL form to MO HealthNet accounting for the remaining balance of the deceased residents’ funds.
Homelike Environment Not Maintained
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a homelike environment on the Men's Locked Behavior Unit, affecting 12 residents observed at meals and potentially all 15 residents on the unit. During meal observations, staff served resident lunch trays on metal carts and left the individual plastic food trays in place on the dining table while residents ate family style. Staff and management stated this was the usual practice on the unit, with an LPN, a CMT, and another LPN explaining that meals were served this way because it was easier, helped prevent residents from taking each other's food, and helped define boundaries for territorial residents. The Administrator also stated the practice had been in place for a while and that some residents liked to use the tray to serve or remove their trays themselves. The facility also had multiple environmental conditions that were not clean or homelike. Observations showed a ceiling diffuser in the A Hall assisted bathroom with a brown substance, a toilet in the E Hall assisted bathroom with non-intact caulking near the base and floor joint, and a portable shower chair with a smeared brown substance. In Room A1, there was grime buildup on floor tiles, stained ceiling tiles above the resident bed and near the hall door, and a utility closet door with a non-intact surface near the floor gap. In Room A3, an unlocked utility closet contained pooled yellow water about 6 inches deep above a floor drain with facility supplies stored on shelving. The Administrator acknowledged a roof leak above Rooms A1 and A3, stained ceiling tiles, the need to replace the door, standing water in the closet, missing caulk around the toilet, and dirty shower chairs and tiles.
Inappropriate Antipsychotic Use and Missing GDR Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medication for two residents and failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction for one resident. The facility policy on psychotropic medication use stated that an adequate indication must be based on an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals, that the clinical rationale for use must be documented, that diagnosis alone does not necessarily warrant psychotropic use, and that residents on psychotropic medication should receive gradual dose reductions unless clinically contraindicated. One resident had diagnoses of major depressive disorder without psychotic features and dementia with behavioral disturbance, and was ordered Zyprexa 5 mg at bedtime for unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. The record did not show documentation that the consultant pharmacist or physician addressed the need for an appropriate diagnosis for Zyprexa, and the annual MDS showed severe cognitive impairment with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors, or rejection of care. The resident's care plan did not address specific problems, interventions, or goals for dementia care, and observations showed the resident lying in bed with eyes closed and later sitting in a wheelchair in the common area leaning to one side with eyes closed. Another resident had diagnoses of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and sleep disorder, and was ordered quetiapine 25 mg at bedtime related to anxiety disorder and sleep disorder. The record did not show documentation that the consultant pharmacist or physician addressed the need for an appropriate diagnosis for quetiapine, and there was no documentation of an attempted GDR. The quarterly MDS showed severe cognitive impairment, no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors, or rejection of care, routine antipsychotic use, and that GDR was not attempted and not documented as contraindicated.
Missing Bed-Hold and Appeal Information in Transfer/Discharge Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required documentation in transfer and discharge notices for four sampled residents when they were transferred to the hospital. The notices did not include the amount the bed would be held under the bed-hold policy, and they also did not include the statement of appeal rights or the required contact information for the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsmen, the agency for protection and advocacy for residents with intellectual disabilities, or the agency for protection and advocacy for residents with mental illness. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility and had multiple hospital transfers and returns. The resident's Notice of Resident Transfer/Discharge and Bed Hold and Return Notification forms dated 11/03/25 and 12/08/25 did not document the daily bed-hold rate or the required appeal and advocacy contact information. The forms dated 11/16/25 and 12/28/25 also did not show a selected bed-hold preference and again lacked the daily bed-hold rate and the required appeal, Ombudsmen, and advocacy contact information. Resident #3, Resident #24, and Resident #41 also had hospital transfers documented in their records, and their Transfer/Discharge and Bed Hold forms were missing the same required information. Resident #3's form dated 01/22/26 did not include a selected bed-hold preference, the daily bed-hold rate, or the appeal and advocacy contact information. Resident #24's form dated 12/22/26 lacked the daily bed-hold rate and the appeal and advocacy contact information. Resident #41 had multiple hospital transfers, and the forms dated 01/10/26, 03/05/26, and 03/11/26 did not include the daily bed-hold rate or the required appeal, Ombudsmen, and advocacy contact information. During interviews, an LPN stated the nurse sending the resident out was responsible for completing the paperwork, and the Administrator stated staff should fill out all blanks on the bed hold and transfer/discharge paperwork, including the bed-hold amount and all required contact information.
Failure to Complete Baseline Care Plan on Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for Resident #43 within 48 hours of admission, and there was no documentation that a summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident or the resident representative. The facility policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline, required a baseline plan of care to meet the resident’s immediate health and safety needs within 48 hours of admission and to include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident, including initial goals based on admission orders, discussion with the resident/representative, and physician orders. Review of Resident #43’s record showed an admission date of 03/02/26 and no baseline care plan documentation. During interview, an LPN stated that the nurse was responsible for completing the baseline care plan for new admissions and acknowledged that it was not completed for Resident #43 upon admission. The MDS Coordinator stated the charge nurse was responsible for completing the baseline care plan on admission and that it should be in the front of the hard chart or under assessments in the EMR. The ADON and DON stated they would expect the baseline care plan to be completed upon admission and within 48 hours with care areas addressed, and that the admitting nurse should complete it as part of the admission packet.
Improper Urinary Catheter Bag Placement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper placement of urinary indwelling catheter drainage bags and tubing for two residents. The facility policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care, required catheter tubing and drainage bags to be kept off the floor and positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the bladder. The deficiency involved Resident #1 and Resident #5, both of whom had indwelling urinary catheters and care plans directing that the catheter bag and tubing be kept below the level of the bladder. Resident #1 had diagnoses including neurogenic bladder and urinary tract infection, and had orders for suprapubic catheter care every shift, catheter flushing as needed, and monthly catheter and drainage bag changes. Observations showed the resident in a low bed with the catheter drainage bag hanging on the bed frame and the bottom of the bag resting on the floor on multiple occasions. During wound care, the ADON placed the drainage bag on top of the mattress near the resident’s leg, then hung it on the bed frame, retrieved it, placed it back on the mattress, and urine flowed up toward the resident’s bladder in the tubing before the bag was returned to the bed frame. Resident #5 had neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and orders for monthly catheter and bag changes, catheter irrigation as needed, and catheter care every shift. Observations showed the drainage bag covered with a dignity drape hanging on the bed frame with the bottom of the bag resting on the floor, and later staff raised the bag waist high above the resident’s bladder, causing urine to drain toward the insertion site. The bag was then placed on the foot of the bed and later into the resident’s lap above bladder level before being hooked to the wheelchair below the bladder. Staff interviews confirmed catheter bags should remain below the bladder and not touch the floor, and the DON, ADON, and Administrator stated the bag should not be placed above the bladder or on the bed.
Respiratory Care Orders, Self-Care Competency, and Oxygen Equipment Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate respiratory care for two residents. For one resident with a tracheostomy and laryngectomy tube, the record showed orders for tube site care, tube cleaning, collar changes, and oxygen via trach mask, but there was no physician order for the resident to perform laryngectomy tube care and suctioning independently. The record also did not include an order for suctioning or for the size and type of airway tube used. The care plan stated the resident would perform his/her own tube care and suctioning, but there was no documentation that the resident received laryngectomy tube care education or that competency for self-care was assessed. During interview, the resident stated he/she did his/her own airway care and preferred to do it independently. The facility also failed to ensure the resident had all needed laryngectomy tube supplies readily available. The extra laryngectomy tube was stored in the ADON’s office rather than being easily accessible to the resident. Facility staff stated the resident was able to keep the airway open without the tube in place, and the DON said she could retrieve the extra tube if needed. The facility procedure for laryngectomy tube care addressed cleaning, stoma care, and suctioning, but did not address ensuring training and competency for a resident providing self-care. For a second resident with COPD and dependence on supplemental oxygen, the physician order was for oxygen at 2 LPM as needed by nasal cannula, but staff observed the resident receiving oxygen at 3 LPM. The resident’s nasal cannula and humidifier were observed undated, and the nasal cannula and nebulizer mask were left without proper storage when not in use, including the nasal cannula lying on the floor and the nebulizer mask sitting on a recliner seat. Staff interviews confirmed that oxygen tubing and humidifiers should be dated, stored in a plastic resealable bag, and that a nasal cannula found on the floor should be replaced. The resident stated he/she wore oxygen at night but was unsure of the ordered setting.
Failure to Individualize Dementia Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents diagnosed with dementia had individualized care plans to address their dementia-related needs and activities for three sampled residents. The facility policy titled Dementia - Clinical Protocol stated that the interdisciplinary team would evaluate residents with cognitive impairment and, for confirmed dementia, identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life, with direct care staff supporting bathing, dressing, mealtimes, and therapeutic and recreational activities as needed. Resident #9 had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance and moderate dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and the annual MDS showed severe cognitive impairment, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and that the resident could understand others and be understood. The care plan did not address specific problems, interventions, or goals for dementia care or activities, and the resident was observed lying in bed with eyes closed and later sitting in a wheelchair in the common area leaning to one side with eyes closed. Resident #13 had diagnoses including dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, mild dementia with anxiety, and Alzheimer's disease with late onset; the quarterly MDS listed cognition intact and dementia diagnoses, but the care plan did not address dementia care or activities, and the resident was observed lying in bed with eyes closed, then later with eyes open, and later sitting in a chair in the room with the television off and the door closed. Resident #16 had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with anxiety and other related conditions, the quarterly MDS showed severe cognitive impairment and non-Alzheimer's dementia, and the care plan did not address dementia, dementia care, or activities; the resident was observed lying in bed with eyes closed and later sitting in a wheelchair in the room with the television on while not watching it and looking around the room. During interview, the DON and Administrator stated they would expect dementia care to be care planned individually and to address the resident's diagnosis and needs.
Infection Control Lapses During Wound, Catheter, and Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices during incontinent care, wound care, and catheter care for multiple residents. During observation of one resident’s incontinent care, CNA E and NA F entered the room and put on gloves without performing hand hygiene. CNA E removed a urine-saturated brief, wiped fecal matter from the resident’s buttocks, and continued care while keeping fecal matter on the glove. Gloves were not changed and hand hygiene was not performed during multiple steps of cleaning, repositioning, and placing clean linens and briefs. During the same care, NA F removed gloves without hand hygiene, left the room to retrieve supplies, and later picked up the resident’s nasal cannula from the floor and placed it into the resident’s nostrils. During observation of another resident’s incontinent care, CNA B and NA C performed hand hygiene and donned gloves, but glove changes and hand hygiene were not consistently performed during care. CNA B cleaned the groin area but did not clean the perineal area, then used the same wipe area repeatedly over the buttocks and perineal area in a circular motion multiple times. NA C removed gloves without hand hygiene and handled dirty laundry and trash. CNA B and NA C then pulled the resident up in bed with the incontinent pad using bare hands. During observation of a third resident’s incontinent care and catheter care, CNA B and NA C again had repeated breaks in glove use and hand hygiene while cleaning the groin, genital area, and catheter insertion area, emptying urine from the catheter bag, rolling the resident, and transferring the resident with a Hoyer lift. During wound care for one resident with EBP signage on the door, LPN A performed hand hygiene and donned gown and gloves, but did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene at multiple points while removing the dressing, cleaning the wound bed, packing the wound with Dakins solution, applying skin prep, removing gauze around the suprapubic catheter, cleaning the catheter tubing, applying split gauze and tape, writing the date on the tape with a marker from the bedside table, detaching and reattaching the catheter tubing to the drainage bag, and flushing the suprapubic catheter. The facility’s policies reviewed by surveyors addressed hand hygiene, perineal care, and urinary catheter care, and staff interviews confirmed that gloves should be changed when contaminated or when moving from dirty to clean care, hand hygiene should occur before and after care, and a nasal cannula found on the floor should not be placed back on a resident.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, which had the potential to affect all 70 residents. Observations revealed a deep crack in the laminate flooring across the dining room, approximately 15 feet in length and 1 inch deep, causing a shift in the walking surface. Additionally, there was approximately 20 feet of missing baseboard trim along the dining room wall near the kitchen and exposed sheetrock measuring 20 inches by 20 inches in the C unit hallway. During interviews, the Maintenance Supervisor stated that the crack in the dining room floor had been present since their employment, and no discussions had occurred regarding its repair. The Administrator acknowledged awareness of the crack, noting it had been there for a long time, with no current plans to address it.
Failure to Attempt Gradual Dose Reduction for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for three residents who were on psychotropic medications, as required by their policy. The policy mandates that residents on such medications should receive GDRs and behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated. However, for Residents #16, #24, and #58, there was no documentation of attempted GDRs or contraindications for their psychotropic medications, which included antidepressants and antipsychotics. Resident #16 had diagnoses including catatonic disorder, anxiety, schizophrenia, and drug-induced akathisia, and was prescribed Paxil, quetiapine, and mirtazapine. Resident #24 had diagnoses such as dementia, suicidal ideations, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder, and was prescribed escitalopram, trazodone, and quetiapine. Resident #58 had conditions including cerebrovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and bipolar disorder, and was prescribed aripiprazole. Despite these prescriptions, there was no evidence of GDR attempts or documented contraindications for these medications. Interviews with the facility's pharmacist and administrator revealed that the facility's practice was to conduct GDRs unless contraindicated, particularly for residents without diagnoses like bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophrenia. The pharmacist indicated that GDRs were typically done within the first three months of admission and then periodically. However, the administrator acknowledged that GDRs should be completed per the facility's policy, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent, resulting in a rate of 7.14% due to errors in insulin administration for two residents. The errors were observed during medication administration for two residents, where the Certified Medical Technician (CMT) did not prime the Fiasp insulin pen as per the manufacturer's instructions before administering the insulin. This oversight occurred despite the facility's policy on insulin administration, which did not specifically address the technique for insulin pen administration. Resident #23 was administered 3 units of Fiasp insulin for a blood sugar level of 199 without priming the pen, and Resident #58 received 3 units for a blood sugar level of 189, also without priming. The CMT involved stated that they only primed the pen when it was brand new and had not been instructed to prime it before each dose. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both confirmed that insulin pens should be primed before each dose according to manufacturer guidelines.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during the care of a resident, specifically during tube feeding and incontinent care. Observations revealed that despite EBP signage being posted outside the resident's room, staff members did not adhere to the policy requiring the use of gloves and gowns for high-contact activities. During a tube feeding administration, an LPN entered the resident's room, performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, administered the feeding, and left the room without wearing an isolation gown. Similarly, during incontinent care, a CNA and a Nursing Assistant entered the room, performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, provided care, and exited without wearing gowns. Interviews with the staff involved indicated a lack of compliance with the EBP policy. The LPN admitted to not wearing a gown during tube feedings, while the CNA and Nursing Assistant stated they did not typically wear gowns for any care provided to the resident. The CNA mentioned consulting the Director of Nursing (DON) about the necessity of wearing a gown and was advised it was not needed. However, the DON later stated that she expected staff to follow EBP precautions, which include wearing gowns during tube feedings and incontinent care.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Birch Tree
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mountain View Healthcare | 11.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Willow Care Nursing Home | 27.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Brooke Haven Healthcare | 27.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Nhc Healthcare, West Plains | 28 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| West Vue Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 28 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Rock Point Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.