Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Nixa Nursing & Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to consistently document residents' CPR preferences, leading to discrepancies between face sheets, POS, care plans, and the Code Status Book. This inconsistency was found in 10 residents, where their face sheets indicated a full code status, but other documents showed a DNR status. Interviews revealed that the SSD was responsible for updating records, but there was no monitoring to ensure accuracy, and the DON and Administrator were unaware of the issue.
A resident reported that an aide took their embroidery scissors, but the facility failed to report this misappropriation to the state within the required 24-hour timeframe. The incident was discussed in a morning meeting, and temporary safety scissors were provided, but the Social Service Director did not document or report the incident as required by policy. The Administrator and Director of Nursing acknowledged the reporting failure, highlighting a deficiency in compliance with state and federal requirements.
A resident reported that an aide took their embroidery scissors, which were used for crocheting and had sentimental value. Despite informing the Administrator and SSD, no formal grievance was filed, and the allegation was not documented or investigated. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and action, with the DON and Administrator failing to initiate an investigation, contrary to facility policy.
Inconsistent Documentation of CPR Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that each resident's choice regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was consistently and clearly documented. This deficiency was identified for 10 residents out of a sample of 16, where conflicting information was recorded about their CPR preferences. The facility's policy required that advance directives be respected and clearly documented, but discrepancies were found between the residents' face sheets, Physician Order Sheets (POS), care plans, and the Code Status Book at the nurses' desk. For several residents, the face sheets indicated a full code status, meaning they wished to receive CPR, while the POS and care plans indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status. Additionally, the Code Status Book, which is used by nurses in emergencies to determine a resident's code status, contained conflicting information. This inconsistency in documentation could lead to confusion during emergencies, as staff might not be able to quickly ascertain a resident's true wishes regarding CPR. Interviews with facility staff, including the Social Services Designee (SSD), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that the SSD was responsible for maintaining up-to-date code status records. However, there was no monitoring system in place to ensure the accuracy of these records, and the DON and Administrator were unaware of the discrepancies. This lack of oversight contributed to the failure to maintain consistent and accurate documentation of residents' CPR preferences.
Failure to Report Misappropriation of Resident Property
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property to the State Survey Agency within the required 24-hour timeframe. A resident, who was cognitively intact, reported that an aide had taken their embroidery scissors, which were a gift from family. The resident informed the Administrator and Social Service Director (SSD) about the missing scissors, but they were unaware of the incident prior to the resident's report. The resident did not wish to file a formal grievance, and the incident was not documented in the facility's grievance log. Interviews with staff revealed that the allegation of misappropriation was discussed in a morning meeting, and the Housekeeping Supervisor provided the resident with a pair of safety scissors temporarily. Despite this, the SSD did not report the incident to the state, as required. The facility's policy mandates that any allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation be reported to the state within 24 hours, but this protocol was not followed in this case. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the incident should have been reported to the state. The DON confirmed that the SSD should have documented the resident's allegations, and the Administrator noted that reports of items taken by staff are considered misappropriation and should be reported within the specified timeframe. The failure to report the incident in a timely manner constitutes a deficiency in the facility's compliance with state and federal requirements.
Failure to Investigate Allegation of Misappropriation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation involving a resident's embroidery scissors. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had been at the facility for over a year, reported that an aide took their scissors, which were used for crocheting and had sentimental value as a gift from family. Despite the resident informing the Administrator and Social Service Director (SSD) about the incident, no formal grievance was filed, and the allegation was not documented or investigated by the staff. Interviews with various staff members, including the SSD, Activities Director, and Director of Nursing (DON), revealed a lack of communication and action regarding the resident's report. The SSD acknowledged the resident's report but did not document it, and the DON and Administrator, who were responsible for investigating such allegations, did not initiate an investigation. The facility's grievance log for the month showed no grievances filed, indicating a failure to follow the facility's policy on investigating allegations of misappropriation.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 141 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Nixa
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunterra Springs Springfield | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Ozark Riverview Manor | 5.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Neighborhoods At Quail Creek, The | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Ozark Care & Rehab Center | 5.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Birch Pointe Health And Rehabilitation | 6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Nixa Nursing & Rehab.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.