Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Marymount Manor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Staff failed to consistently complete required neurological checks and 72-hour incident follow-up documentation after resident falls, including for residents with severe cognitive impairment and multiple comorbidities. Medical records showed missing neuro evaluations and progress notes, despite facility policy and staff expectations for thorough post-fall assessment and documentation.
A resident with cognitive impairment alleged inappropriate touching by a staff member, but the facility staff failed to report the allegation within the required time frame. The resident's account varied, and the staff involved did not immediately report the incident, violating the facility's abuse and neglect policy. The DON found no evidence of misconduct, but the reporting failure was a clear policy breach.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions was not readmitted to the facility after hospitalization due to behavioral issues. The facility's DON and IA decided not to accept the resident back, citing safety concerns, but failed to follow the emergency discharge process, including providing the required notice. The resident's care plan did not address the behavioral issues, leading to a deficiency in compliance with the facility's policies.
The facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry before stacking them in storage, which could lead to the growth of food-borne pathogens. Dietary aides and cooks were observed stacking wet dishes, and the Dietary Manager confirmed that staff are trained to allow dishes to air dry. The administrator stated that the Dietary Manager is expected to monitor dishwashing and storage daily, although no documentation of these inspections is required.
Facility staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinence care for three residents and did not properly sanitize a multi-use glucometer between uses for two residents. Observations and interviews revealed lapses in following established protocols, leading to potential infection control issues.
Facility staff failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The ADON and DON admitted to not tracking or trending antibiotic use, and the administrator had no knowledge of antibiotic stewardship, only discussing antibiotic use in morning meetings without reviewing trends.
Facility staff failed to ensure a resident's water cup was within reach, preventing independent drinking, and did not provide proper table heights for two residents, hindering meal independence. Observations and interviews confirmed these deficiencies, with staff citing safety concerns and staffing shortages as reasons for not transferring residents to regular chairs.
Facility staff failed to maintain a clean, homelike, and comfortable environment, with multiple observations of resident rooms and common areas in disrepair. Interviews revealed that while staff reported issues, limited maintenance resources and competing priorities delayed necessary repairs.
Facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for four residents. The care plans lacked direction for staff regarding activity preferences, despite these preferences being documented in the MDS. Interviews revealed that the MDS Coordinator, who was responsible for completing the care plans, was recently terminated for not fulfilling their duties.
Facility staff failed to review and revise care plans with changes in residents' care needs for four residents. Care plans lacked direction for the use of side rails and new interventions after falls, despite observations indicating their necessity. Interviews revealed that the MDS Coordinator was responsible for care plans but was recently terminated for not completing their responsibilities.
Facility staff failed to provide an ongoing program of activities for residents on weekends and in the memory care unit. The activity calendar showed limited weekend activities, and observations confirmed that memory care residents were often left without staff-led activities. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of full-time activity aides and scheduled activities, leading to unmet resident needs.
Facility staff failed to use wheelchair foot pedals for four residents, resulting in their feet dragging on the floor while being propelled. Despite the facility's policy, staff did not consistently apply foot pedals, leading to potential accident hazards.
Facility staff failed to complete necessary assessments and obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails for four residents. Observations showed these residents using bed rails or grab bars without the required documentation. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and understanding of the procedures for bed rail assessments and entrapment risks.
Facility staff failed to ensure that three nurse aides completed the training program within four months of employment due to scheduling conflicts and delays. The DON was unaware of the requirement, while the Director of Human Resources knew but only handled enrollment once notified by facility HR.
Facility staff failed to store and label medications properly, with opened and undated bottles found in the medication cart and non-medication items stored in the medication refrigerator. Staff interviews revealed lapses in adherence to the facility's storage policy, despite recent in-service training.
Facility staff failed to protect residents' personal privacy by leaving the MAR open and unattended in a public hallway. Multiple staff members, including an LPN, an RN, and a CMT, were observed leaving resident information exposed. Interviews confirmed that the MAR should have been closed when away from the cart. The DON and administrator stated that computer screens should be minimized or closed down, and carts should be locked.
Facility staff failed to provide written notice to residents or their representatives regarding hospital transfers for three sampled residents. Interviews revealed that staff were either unaware of the requirement or uncertain about the process, and the responsible social worker was still in training.
Facility staff failed to provide necessary grooming services to three dependent residents, resulting in long fingernails with debris, unshaven facial hair, and unbrushed hair. Staff cited short staffing and the inability to re-approach residents as contributing factors.
Failure to Complete Neurological Evaluations and Incident Follow-Up After Resident Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately assess and document resident falls in accordance with acceptable standards of practice and its own policies. Specifically, staff did not consistently complete neurological evaluations, which include assessments such as pulse, respiration, blood pressure, pupil size and reactivity, and hand grip strength, for residents who experienced unwitnessed falls or incidents involving head injury. This deficiency was observed in three residents, all of whom had significant cognitive impairments and multiple comorbidities, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and end-stage renal disease. In addition to incomplete neurological checks, the facility did not ensure that incident follow-up (IFU) documentation was completed for 72 hours post-fall in the progress notes for each shift, as required by facility policy. Multiple instances were noted where IFU documentation was missing for both day and night shifts following falls. The records showed gaps in documentation for several days after falls, despite the residents being at high risk due to their medical conditions and history of previous falls. Interviews with nursing staff, the Administrator, and the DON confirmed that the expected protocol was to perform full assessments, complete neuro checks for unwitnessed falls or head injuries, notify appropriate parties, and document all findings and notifications in the nursing notes and incident reports. However, the review of medical records and progress notes demonstrated that these procedures were not consistently followed, resulting in incomplete assessments and documentation for the affected residents.
Failure to Timely Report Allegation of Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse within the required time frame, as per their abuse and neglect policy. The incident involved a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of traumatic brain injury, who alleged inappropriate touching by a staff member. The resident's account of the incident varied, and the staff members involved did not report the allegation immediately, as required by the facility's policy. The resident initially reported to an LPN that a staff member had inappropriately touched them while changing their diaper. The resident described the alleged perpetrator as resembling a sibling of a CNA, but not the CNA themselves. Despite the resident's inconsistent accounts and history of making false allegations, the facility's policy mandates immediate reporting of such allegations, which was not adhered to by the staff involved. The DON conducted interviews with the resident and staff, concluding that there was no evidence of inappropriate conduct by the accused staff member. However, the failure to report the allegation immediately was a clear violation of the facility's abuse and neglect policy. The resident's representative acknowledged the resident's history of making accusations, but the facility's obligation to report and investigate such allegations promptly was not fulfilled.
Failure to Readmit Resident After Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy regarding the readmission of residents following hospitalization, as evidenced by the case of a resident who was not permitted to return after being sent to the hospital. The facility's discharge procedures policy outlines specific conditions under which a resident may be discharged or refused readmission, none of which were appropriately applied in this case. The resident, who had been admitted to the facility with moderate cognitive impairment and several medical conditions, including bipolar disorder and severe sepsis, was sent to the hospital due to behavioral issues and pain complaints. Upon the resident's hospitalization, the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Interim Administrator (IA) decided not to accept the resident back, citing concerns for the resident's safety and the safety of others due to the resident's disruptive behavior. However, the facility did not follow the required emergency discharge process, which includes providing an emergency discharge notice to the resident. The DON confirmed that no such notice was given, and the emergency discharge process was not followed, despite the decision to refuse readmission. The resident's medical records and nurse's notes indicate a history of behavioral issues, including yelling and resistance to care, which were not adequately addressed in the care plan. The facility's failure to document and communicate the reasons for the discharge decision, as well as the lack of adherence to the established discharge procedures, resulted in a deficiency in the facility's compliance with its own policies and regulatory requirements.
Failure to Allow Sanitized Dishes to Air Dry Before Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry prior to stacking them in storage and use, which could lead to the growth of food-borne pathogens. This issue was observed multiple times during a survey. Dietary Aide V was seen pulling a rack of sanitized plastic cups from the mechanical dishwasher, stacking them while wet, and placing them on a service tray. Similarly, Dietary Aide W removed sanitized insulated plate covers and glasses from the dishwasher, stacked them while wet, and placed them on a utility cart. Both aides acknowledged that dishes should be dry before being put away but cited reasons such as being in a hurry or lack of space and time for not following the protocol. The Dietary Manager confirmed that staff are trained to allow dishes to air dry before storage and that this requirement is part of their management duties, although no documentation of daily inspections was expected. Further observations revealed that eight metal food preparation and service pans were stacked together wet under the counter in the cook's station. Cook X confirmed that the pans should be air dried before being stacked but noted that he/she did not wash those pans that morning. During the lunch meal, staff used wet-stacked glasses and plate covers for serving food items. The administrator reiterated that staff are trained to allow dishes to dry before storage and that the Dietary Manager is expected to monitor dishwashing and storage daily, although no documentation of these inspections is required.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Hand Hygiene and Glucometer Sanitization
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinence care for three residents. Observations showed that staff did not wash their hands or change gloves between dirty and clean tasks, such as handling soiled briefs and then touching clean items or the resident's clothing. Interviews with the staff confirmed that they were aware of the hand hygiene and glove change protocols but failed to follow them due to anxiety or oversight during the observed care activities. Additionally, the facility staff did not appropriately sanitize a multi-use glucometer between uses for two residents. The Registered Nurse (RN) was observed wiping the glucometer but not allowing it to remain wet for the required two minutes, and in another instance, the RN did not sanitize the glucometer at all between resident uses. Interviews with the RN and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed inconsistencies in the understanding and implementation of the glucometer cleaning policy. The facility's policies on hand hygiene, glove use, and glucometer cleaning were not adhered to, leading to potential infection control issues. The DON and the administrator acknowledged the lapses in following the established protocols and the need for proper hand hygiene and equipment sanitization to prevent the spread of infections within the facility.
Failure to Implement Antibiotic Stewardship Program
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility's policy on Antibiotic Stewardship outlined several actions, including reviewing and monitoring antibiotic use during weekly risk meetings, committing resources for monitoring and providing feedback, developing facility-specific standards for empiric antibiotic use, and reviewing antibiotic appropriateness and resistance patterns regularly. However, the facility staff did not track antibiotic trends. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) mentioned that they generate a report through their electronic medical record (EMR) but did not consistently track or trend antibiotic use. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that while they take notes on who is on antibiotics and why during risk assessment meetings, they do not review trends. The administrator admitted to having no knowledge of antibiotic stewardship and stated that they only discuss antibiotic use in morning meetings without reviewing trends.
Failure to Accommodate Resident Needs and Preferences
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for Resident #53 by not ensuring the water cup was within reach, preventing the resident from drinking independently. Despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment and inability to stand or walk, observations showed the water cup was repeatedly placed out of reach. Interviews with the resident's family member, CNAs, the DON, and the administrator confirmed that the resident could not access the water cup without assistance, contradicting the care plan directives to monitor and assist with food and fluid intake and hydration evaluation. Additionally, the facility staff failed to ensure acceptable table heights to encourage meal independence for two residents, Resident #68 and Resident #37. Both residents, who used wheelchairs and had upper and lower extremity impairments, were observed struggling to eat due to improper positioning at the dining tables. Staff did not assist these residents in transferring to regular chairs or repositioning them to better reach their food, leading to food being dropped onto their laps. Interviews with a CMT and an LPN revealed that staff often did not transfer residents from wheelchairs to regular chairs due to safety concerns, time constraints, and staffing shortages.
Failure to Maintain a Clean and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide a clean, homelike, and comfortable environment as evidenced by multiple observations of resident rooms and common areas in disrepair. Specifically, resident rooms had gouge marks, missing and chipped paint, and damaged baseboards. The memory care unit's common areas, including the shower supply room, clean utility room doors, and dining room, were observed to be soiled, with black marks, chipped paint, and debris. These observations were made over several days, indicating a persistent issue with maintenance and cleanliness in the facility. Interviews with staff, including a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), the maintenance supervisor, the administrator, and the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that while staff were directed to report environmental concerns to the maintenance department, the issues persisted due to the maintenance department's limited resources and competing priorities. The maintenance supervisor acknowledged the need for repairs but cited other obligations that required prioritization. The administrator and DON confirmed that the building is old and requires constant maintenance, but the limited number of maintenance workers has delayed the completion of necessary repairs.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four residents out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 74. The facility did not provide a policy for comprehensive care plans. Resident #38's care plan did not contain direction for staff regarding activity preferences, despite the resident's preferences being documented in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Resident #44's care plan lacked documentation of preferences for activities, and Resident #63's care plan also did not contain direction for staff regarding activity preferences. Resident #78's care plan did not include direction for staff for the activity preference, even though the resident's preferences were documented in the MDS. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the MDS coordinator was responsible for completing the care plans, but the care plans were not being completed as required. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and the Administrator both stated that care plans should include activity preferences and the type of assistance a resident required for activities of daily living. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that care plans should include these details. The MDS Coordinator was recently terminated for not completing their responsibilities, which contributed to the deficiencies in the care plans.
Failure to Update and Review Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to review and revise the care plans with changes in the residents' care needs for four residents out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 74. The facility did not provide a policy for comprehensive care plans. Resident #47's care plan did not contain direction for the use of side rails, despite the resident being observed with grab bars in an upright position on both sides of the bed. Resident #56's care plan also lacked direction for the use of grab bars, even though the resident was observed with a grab bar in the upright position on the right side of the bed on multiple occasions. Resident #78's care plan did not include new interventions after a fall with injury to the ear. Resident #79's care plan did not contain direction for the use of side rails, although the resident was observed with bilateral bed rails in the upright position. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, revealed that the MDS Coordinator was responsible for completing and updating care plans. The staff acknowledged that care plans should include details such as side rails, activity preferences, the type of assistance required for activities of daily living, and new interventions after falls. The Administrator mentioned that the MDS Coordinator was recently terminated for not fulfilling their responsibilities. The lack of updated and accurate care plans for these residents indicates a failure in the facility's process for ensuring that care plans reflect current care needs and interventions.
Lack of Activities for Residents on Weekends and in Memory Care Unit
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the residents' interests on the weekends and for residents who reside on the memory care unit. The facility's activity calendar showed limited activities on weekends, primarily religious services, and no other scheduled activities. Interviews with staff, including the Activity Director (AD), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the absence of full-time activity aides on weekends and the lack of scheduled activities during these times. The AD, who started in October, acknowledged the lack of weekend activities and the absence of a full-time activity aide to provide them. Observations and interviews revealed that residents in the memory care unit were not receiving daily activities. The memory care unit's activity calendar showed minimal scheduled activities, and observations confirmed that residents were often left without staff-led activities. The AD admitted to visiting the memory care unit only twice a week and taking some residents to events outside the unit, but not all residents were included. The AD also mentioned that an assistant who used to provide activities had quit a week ago, and there were no scheduled activities in the memory care unit. Interviews with staff, including a Nurse Aide (NA) and the LPN, confirmed the lack of daily scheduled activities in the memory care unit. The Administrator and DON acknowledged the staff shortage and the inability to provide activities for all residents. The Administrator mentioned that some memory care residents were invited to activities outside the unit, but not all due to staff shortages. The DON believed that memory care staff could provide a half-hour activity daily, but this was not consistently happening. Overall, the facility failed to meet the residents' needs for an ongoing program of activities, particularly on weekends and in the memory care unit.
Failure to Use Wheelchair Foot Pedals
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for four residents (#37, #47, #54, and #66) out of eleven sampled residents. Staff did not apply foot pedals to the residents' wheelchairs, resulting in the residents' feet dragging on the floor while being propelled. This was observed multiple times for each resident, with staff propelling the residents without foot pedals, despite the facility's policy requiring foot pedals to be used to prevent accidents. The facility census was 74. Resident #37 was observed being propelled to the dining room without foot pedals, causing the resident's right heel to slide on the floor. Resident #47, who had severe cognitive impairment, was also observed being propelled without foot pedals, with their feet sliding on the floor. Resident #54 and Resident #66 were similarly observed being propelled without foot pedals, with their feet dragging on the floor. Interviews with staff, including a CNA, LPN, DON, and the administrator, confirmed that staff were aware of the policy but did not always follow it, leading to the potential risk of residents falling out of their wheelchairs.
Failure to Complete Bed Rail Assessments and Obtain Consent
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to complete necessary assessments and obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails for four residents. The facility's policy required staff to assess residents for risk of entrapment, review risks and benefits with the resident or their representative, obtain informed consent, and ensure proper installation and maintenance of bed rails. However, for Residents #37, #47, #56, and #79, the facility did not document these required steps. Observations showed that these residents were using bed rails or grab bars without the necessary assessments or consents in place. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and understanding of the required procedures for bed rail assessments and entrapment risks. Resident #37 had left-sided paralysis and used a grab bar for positioning, but there was no documentation of risk and benefit review, side rail assessment, or informed consent. Resident #47, with severe cognitive impairment, was observed with grab bars in an upright position on both sides of the bed, but again, no documentation of the required assessments or consents was found. Resident #56, who had impaired physical mobility and mild to moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with a grab bar in the upright position, but the necessary documentation was missing. Resident #79, with mild to moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with bilateral bed rails in the upright position, and the resident stated they did not request the bed rails. Interviews with staff, including a CNA, LPN, and the Director of Nursing, indicated a lack of knowledge about the required assessments and documentation for bed rail use.
Failure to Ensure Timely Completion of Nurse Aide Training
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that three nurse aides (NA A, NA B, and NA C) completed the nurse aide training program within four months of their employment. NA A, hired on 09/06/23, had not started the program due to a conflict with their school schedule. NA B, hired on 11/08/23, was waiting to take the skilled portion of the program and was enrolled for the May session. NA C, hired on 11/14/23, had just started the program. The Director of Nursing (DON) was unaware that the training needed to be completed within four months, while the Director of Human Resources was aware but stated that their job was only to enroll the staff in the program once notified by facility HR. The facility's policy required individuals to complete a nursing assistant training program within four months of employment. However, the facility struggled with scheduling conflicts and delays in enrolling the nurse aides in the training program. Interviews with the DON and the Director of Human Resources revealed a lack of communication and understanding of the policy requirements, leading to the failure to ensure timely completion of the training program for the nurse aides involved.
Improper Medication Storage and Labeling
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to store and label medications in a safe and effective manner. Observations revealed that the medication cart on the 200 hall contained four opened and undated bottles of fluticasone, one opened and undated bottle of artificial tears, and one opened and undated bottle of eye itch relief. Interviews with staff indicated that medications should be labeled with the date opened to ensure they are not administered after their expiration date. However, the medications in question were not labeled, and staff were unsure why the bottles were not labeled, especially since there was an in-service on medication management the previous month. The facility's policy did not provide specific directions for labeling medications with the date opened, contributing to the oversight. Additionally, the medication storage room refrigerator contained non-medication items such as soda, chocolate, and butter, alongside medications like insulin pens and Med Pass 2.0 containers. Staff interviews confirmed that the refrigerator in the medication room is designated for medications only to prevent cross-contamination. Despite this, non-medication items were found stored with medications, indicating a lapse in adherence to the facility's storage policy. The Administrator and DON both acknowledged that medications should not be stored with food and reiterated that there had been an in-service on medication storage recently.
Failure to Protect Resident Privacy
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure residents' personal privacy was protected when they left the Medication Administration Records (MAR) open and unattended in a public hallway. The facility census was 74. The facility did not provide a policy for privacy during medication pass. On multiple occasions, staff members, including an LPN, an RN, and a CMT, were observed leaving the MAR open and unattended with resident information exposed. Staff and residents were seen walking past the cart during these times. Interviews with the RN and CMT confirmed that the MAR should have been closed when away from the cart. The Director of Nursing and the administrator both stated that computer screens should be minimized or closed down when walking away from the cart, and carts should be locked.
Failure to Provide Written Transfer/Discharge Notices
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide written notice to residents or their representatives regarding transfers to the hospital for three sampled residents. The facility's Discharge/Transfer Policy requires written notice to include specific information such as the reason for transfer, effective date, appeal rights, and contact information for the ombudsman. However, the medical records for Resident #15, Resident #54, and Resident #73 did not contain the required transfer/discharge notices despite multiple hospital transfers and returns documented for these residents. During interviews, an LPN stated they were unaware of the discharge/transfer notice requirement, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that such notices should be completed for transfers/discharges. The facility administrator also expressed uncertainty about the discharge notices, noting that the social worker responsible for this task was new and still in training. The facility census at the time was 74 residents.
Failure to Provide Adequate Grooming for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that three dependent residents received the necessary care and services to maintain adequate grooming. Resident #44, who had severe cognitive impairment, was observed multiple times with long fingernails containing debris and unshaven facial hair. Despite attempts by staff to provide care, the resident was combative, and staff did not always re-approach due to being understaffed. Resident #63, who required substantial to maximum assistance with personal hygiene, was observed with facial hair and debris under the nails. The resident was not shaved during a shower due to being upset, and staff did not have time to re-approach due to feeling overwhelmed. Resident #78, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required total assistance, was observed with unbrushed hair and long, jagged nails with debris over several days. The resident did not reject care, but staff failed to provide the necessary grooming services. Interviews with staff revealed that nail care and facial hair shaves were provided on shower days and as needed, but due to short staffing, these tasks were not always completed. CNA G mentioned that staff were directed to re-approach residents who refused care, but this was not always feasible due to understaffing. LPN F and the administrator acknowledged that aides were responsible for grooming tasks and that unkempt nails and facial hair posed infection control concerns. The administrator and DON stated that staff should call other units for assistance if needed, but this did not always happen. The facility's policy on ADLs emphasized promoting the highest level of health and hygiene for residents, but it did not provide specific procedures for staff to follow. The lack of adherence to this policy and the failure to provide necessary grooming services to dependent residents resulted in the observed deficiencies. Staff interviews highlighted the challenges of short staffing and the impact on the quality of care provided to residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 756 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Eureka
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Andrew's At Francis Place | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Aegis Health And Rehabilitation | 4.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Ellisville Rehabilitation And Nursing | 6.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 3 |
| Pacific Care Center | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Lutheran Senior Services At Meramec Bluffs | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Marymount Manor.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.