Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Luther Manor Retirement & Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents experienced significant injuries due to the facility's failure to prevent accidents and provide adequate supervision. One resident, dependent on staff for transfers, was injured during a manual transfer when staff could not use a mechanical lift due to a malfunctioning bed, resulting in a severe leg laceration likely caused by contact with a wheelchair pedal. Another resident with dementia and a history of wandering was able to exit the building unsupervised, as the door alarm was not heard by staff, leading to a fall outside and multiple abrasions. In both cases, staff did not follow established safety protocols or ensure effective monitoring.
The facility did not ensure that nurse aides received the required 12 hours of annual in-service education, as there was no documentation or tracking system in place. The DON acknowledged the lack of records and was unaware of the specific educational content required, despite being aware of the 12-hour mandate.
Unsafe food storage and unsanitary kitchen practices were observed. A refrigerator used for resident food repeatedly ran above proper temperatures, and spoiled-looking food with mold-like substance was found inside along with unlabeled and improperly wrapped items. During meal service, a cook handled food with contaminated gloves and changed gloves without handwashing, and another cook served food without a hair restraint while hair hung near the face. The dining room ice machine also had black speckled debris, splatters, and crusty buildup on the dispensing area.
Staff failed to use EBP during high-contact care for a resident with an open leg wound and another resident with ESBL history, with CNAs and an LPN observed providing care without gowns despite signage and care plan cues. Staff also carried dirty linens and clothing down the hall without bagging them first, placing loose items into soiled linen carts. The facility further lacked a completed Legionella water management program, with no active water management team, no ASHRAE-based plan, no water testing, and no flushing of unused water sources.
A facility failed to properly manage resident trust funds for two residents by not maintaining individual ledgers, not sending quarterly statements to the resident or representative, and not distributing accrued interest to each account. Staff confirmed no resident fund statements had been provided, and a resident representative reported not receiving any account statements despite requesting them.
Incomplete and inconsistent code status documentation left several residents’ CPR wishes unclear in the chart and at the nurses’ station. Records for multiple residents showed blank or conflicting entries on the face sheet, baseline care plan, physician orders, care plan, and CCD, while an undated full code list at the nurses’ station did not consistently match those records. Interviews with residents and representatives also revealed uncertainty or stated DNR preferences that were not reflected consistently in the documentation.
Failure to Complete Required Pre-Employment Screening: The facility did not complete required pre-employment CBC, EDL, FCSR, and NA registry checks for several newly hired staff before hire. The policy did not address NA registry checks, and the CBC used was not guaranteed to include MSHP checks. Record review showed some staff had missing or late screening documentation, and the unit secretary stated some NA registry checks were only completed after the state agency requested employee files.
Meals Served at Unappetizing Temperatures: Residents reported that dinner room trays were cold or did not taste good, and several residents at council said their dinner food was cold. Observation of the dinner meal showed plated hot foods were covered, placed on a cart, transported to the halls, and served to rooms, with a test tray later measuring well below hot-serving temperatures; the Dietary Mgr and dietary staff stated hot foods should be served hot.
Failure to Implement Effective QAA Committee Oversight: The facility did not implement an effective QAA committee to develop and track identified concerns for resolution. The QAPI plan called for monthly committee review, trending of key monitors, and use of data to support PIPs, but the most recent QAA minutes did not identify or address any quality assurance deficiencies. The administrator said issues were discussed verbally by department heads, but no written PIPs were documented, and he had not identified any widespread deficient practice related to quality of care or quality of life.
Improper Catheter and Incontinent Care: A resident with an indwelling catheter, CKD, BPH, and neurogenic bladder received catheter care that did not follow the care plan or infection control practices. Staff observed the drainage bag in a dignity bag under the wheelchair with tubing dragging on the floor, and during transfer and bed care CNAs repeatedly raised the bag above bladder level, causing urine to back flow toward the bladder and up the tubing.
The facility did not maintain an up-to-date facility-wide assessment to determine necessary resources for competent care during daily operations and emergencies. Only the first page of the assessment, containing contact and licensing information, was updated, while the rest of the document was outdated. The administrator confirmed the assessment had not been fully updated since his arrival, with updates made only after the survey began.
Incomplete transfer/discharge notices and Ombudsman notification failure: The facility did not provide three residents with written transfer/discharge notices that included the reason for transfer, appeal rights, appeal hearing contact information, or Ombudsman and advocacy agency contact information. The residents were transferred by EMS to the hospital after acute changes in condition such as neurologic deficits, confusion with bloody diarrhea, and fever with hypoxia. The Ombudsman reported the facility had not been sending transfer/discharge information, and the SSD said she was not aware of the required Ombudsman notifications or all required notice content.
The facility did not ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Surveyors observed environmental hazards and insufficient staff monitoring, resulting in increased risk for resident accidents.
A resident with hemiplegia and limited mobility experienced a fall and complained of hip pain, receiving Tylenol twice for pain management. Despite these complaints and administration of pain medication, staff did not notify the physician of the pain until two days later, resulting in a delayed diagnosis of a hip fracture. Facility protocols required timely physician notification of abnormal findings, but this was not followed.
A resident with a prior humerus fracture was found to have a new fracture requiring surgery, but staff did not recognize it as a new injury and failed to report it to the state agency as required. The LPN notified the DON and ADON, but due to uncertainty about the origin of the injury and lack of detailed information, the incident was not reported according to facility policy.
Failure to Prevent Accidents and Provide Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate oversight and prevent injury for two residents, resulting in significant harm. One resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, and was dependent on staff for all transfers, was injured during a transfer when staff manually moved the resident due to a malfunctioning electronic bed. The mechanical lift could not be used because the bed would not raise, and staff proceeded with a two-person manual transfer. During this process, the resident sustained a large open laceration to the left lower extremity, which required emergency medical care, including sutures, antibiotics, pain management, and wound care. Documentation and staff statements indicated that the injury likely occurred when the resident's leg caught on the wheelchair pedal, which had not been removed prior to the transfer, contrary to safe transfer practices outlined in the care plan. Another resident, with a history of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and wandering, experienced an elopement that resulted in a fall with injury. The resident was known to require a wander guard and supervision due to increased confusion and wandering behavior. On the day of the incident, the resident was able to exit the building and was found outside by a pharmacy delivery driver, who later discovered the resident had fallen in the parking lot. Staff interviews and written statements revealed that the door alarm, which was intended to alert staff to unauthorized exits, was either not heard by staff or was not loud enough to be effective throughout the building. Multiple staff members reported not hearing the alarm, and the resident was able to leave the building unsupervised, resulting in abrasions and complaints of pain that required hospital evaluation. In both cases, the facility did not ensure that safety measures and supervision were effectively implemented according to the residents' care plans and needs. The lack of proper use of equipment, failure to follow transfer protocols, and insufficient monitoring of exit alarms directly contributed to the residents' injuries. The report documents that these deficiencies were identified through observation, interview, and record review, and that the facility did not have adequate policies or practices in place to prevent such incidents at the time they occurred.
Failure to Ensure Required Annual In-Service Education for Nurse Aides
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received the required 12 hours of in-service education annually. During the survey, it was found that the facility could not provide a policy regarding the required in-service training for Nursing Assistants when requested. Review of the facility assessment indicated a comprehensive list of staff competencies and annual training requirements, including abuse prevention, dementia care, infection control, and other critical areas. However, there was no evidence that these requirements were being tracked or met for the nurse aides. In an interview, the DON stated that both she and the nurse educator provide in-services and education for CNAs, and that the nurse educator offers education during CNA classes. Despite this, the DON admitted there was no documentation of in-services, nor was there a system in place to track whether CNAs completed the required 12 hours of annual education. The DON was aware of the 12-hour requirement but was not familiar with the specific educational content needed within those hours and had not reviewed the facility assessment to identify the necessary in-service education topics.
Unsafe Food Storage and Unsanitary Kitchen Practices
Penalty
Summary
Food was not stored, prepared, distributed, and served in a safe and sanitary manner. The Family Room refrigerator used to store resident food on the 300 hall repeatedly failed to maintain proper temperatures, with the refrigerator reading above 45 degrees F on 24 of 30 days and the freezer above 0 degrees F on all 30 days. On observation, the refrigerator was at 50 degrees F and contained slices of pizza in an unlabeled pizza box, an unknown food item with a fuzzy gray mold-like substance on the surface in a black container labeled with a resident's name, and a sandwich wrapped in a fast food wrapper. The freezer compartment contained a partially melted ice pack and was reading 30 degrees F. The Maintenance Supervisor stated the refrigerator was starting to get warm and the facility was looking into replacing it, and the Administrator said he was unaware it was not cooling properly. Food service practices in the kitchen were also observed to be unsanitary. During lunch meal service, Cook BB used gloved hands to touch serving utensil handles and breadsticks, adjusted clothes with gloved hands, removed gloves, dropped one glove on the floor, picked it up, and then put on new gloves without washing hands before continuing to serve residents. During dinner meal service, Cook Y served food without wearing a hairnet and had hair hanging down by the face. The Dietary Manager stated staff were expected to wear hair restraints and wash hands frequently while working in the kitchen, including after dirty tasks and when changing gloves. The facility's ice machine in the dining room was also observed to be unclean. Moist, black speckled debris was present on the ice dispensing spout, with splatters and drips across the dispensing area and brown crusty debris above the metal grate below the dispensing area. Maintenance staff said the interior of the ice machine was cleaned monthly, while the Dietary Manager said dietary staff cleaned the exterior weekly. The facility did not provide policies for food storage, dietary handwashing and gloving, hair restraints, ice machine cleaning, or storing resident food items.
EBP, Linen Handling, and Legionella Program Failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide and implement an infection prevention and control program when staff did not use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two residents and did not handle dirty linens according to policy. One resident had a left lower leg laceration with sutures and an open area requiring dressing changes, but there was no EBP order, no EBP signage, and no EBP supplies outside the room. During wound care, an LPN and a CNA performed care without gowns, and the LPN repeatedly removed and reapplied gloves while handling the saturated dressing and cleansing the wound. The resident’s care plan had not been updated to reflect EBP. A second resident had a history of ESBL and a care plan that identified a need for EBP during high-contact activities. During observed care, two CNAs completed transfers and pericare while wearing gloves but not gowns, even though the resident was incontinent of urine and dependent on staff for transfers, hygiene, toileting hygiene, and bathing. The room signage indicated EBP for both beds, but the CNAs stated they believed the precautions applied only to the roommate. The ADON/IP stated that residents with wounds or a history of MDROs would be placed on EBP and that staff should wear gown and gloves for personal care and wound care. The facility also failed to follow its linen handling policy. An LPN and a CNA were observed carrying dirty linens and dirty clothing down the hallway in gloved hands without placing them in plastic bags at the point of use. The items were then placed into soiled linen carts, and loose linens were later observed in the carts, including bed linens with a strong urine odor. Staff interviews confirmed that dirty linens should have been bagged before leaving the resident room, and the housekeeping supervisor and ADON/IP stated that no loose linens should be carried down the hall. In addition, the facility did not have a completed Legionella water management program. The water management plan reviewed was a CDC toolkit without evidence of a water management team, ASHRAE-based plan, water flow diagram, water testing, cold water temperature testing, or flushing of stagnant water sources. The maintenance director stated he was not part of a water management team, was only checking hot water temperatures weekly, did not know much about Legionella, and had not flushed unused bathtub and whirlpool lines for quite some time. The administrator stated the facility had not had an active water management team or meetings since he began working there.
Resident Trust Fund Accounting and Statement Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly hold, secure, and manage resident personal funds for two residents whose money was deposited with the nursing home. Review of the facility’s policy showed each resident was to have an individual personal ledger, bank interest was to be credited to each account at least quarterly, and written account statements were to be provided to the resident or representative at least quarterly. However, review of the resident trust fund records showed no individual ledgers for either resident and no documentation that quarterly statements or written accounts of receipts and disbursements were provided to the residents or their representatives. Review of the monthly resident fund bank statements and trust fund records from September 2024 through August 2025 showed interest was added to the resident fund bank account each month, but there was no documentation that the accrued interest was distributed to the two residents’ accounts. The representative for one resident stated no statements had been received and a verbal request for a trust fund statement had not been fulfilled. Staff interviews confirmed that no quarterly statements had been sent, no resident fund statements had been provided, and the residents did not have individual ledgers. The administrator stated he would expect residents to know the balance and breakdown of credits and debits and would expect quarterly statements to be sent to the resident or representative.
Incomplete and Inconsistent Code Status Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents’ wishes for CPR/code status were documented in the medical record and readily accessible to staff in an emergency. Surveyors reviewed five residents whose records showed missing, blank, or inconsistent code status documentation across the face sheet, baseline care plan, physician orders, comprehensive care plan, and continuity of care document. The facility policy stated that if a resident was listed as Full Code, or if no code status or DNR form was on file, a full code would be initiated by direct care staff. For one resident, the care plan listed full code status, but the physician order sheet did not show an active code status order, and the full code list at the nurse’s station identified the resident as full code. The resident’s representatives gave conflicting information during interviews, with one saying the resident was DNR but not sure, and another saying he/she had been told the resident was DNR. For two other residents, the face sheets, baseline care plans, physician orders, and care plans did not document code status, and the undated CCDs showed no advance directives on file. At the nurse’s station, an undated paper listing full code residents did not include these residents, indicating DNR status, while one responsible party said the facility had asked about code status at admission and he/she had said he/she would get back with them. For another resident, the baseline care plan and physician order sheet were blank for code status, but the comprehensive care plan listed full code; however, the resident was not listed on the full code sheet at the nurse’s station and told the surveyor he/she did not want CPR and wished to be DNR. For a fifth resident, the face sheet, baseline care plan, physician orders, and CCD did not document code status, the hospice record did not show an elected code status, and the resident was not listed on the full code sheet at the nurse’s station, indicating DNR status; the resident also told the surveyor he/she would not want CPR if his/her heart stopped. Staff interviews showed they expected code status to be documented on the face sheet, baseline care plan, care plan, and physician order, and that nurses would check the face sheet and the full code sheet at the nurse’s station in an emergency.
Failure to Complete Required Pre-Employment Screening
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete required pre-employment background screenings for newly hired staff, including the criminal background check (CBC), employee disqualification list (EDL) check, Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) check, and Nurse Aide (NA) registry check. The facility policy required an EDL check, criminal record check, and FCSR application prior to employment, but the policy did not address NA registry checks. Review of SentryLink information showed the CBC used by the facility was not guaranteed to include Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) checks unless a specialized state-mandated process was used, and the administrator stated he had checked with SentryLink and learned it did not include MSHP. Record review showed the Administrator was hired before the FCSR letter was received and before the EDL and NA registry checks were completed. Dietary Aide FF, Housekeeper M, RN JJ, and Activity Assistant KK each had SentryLink CBC documentation dated before hire, but there was no documentation that the CBC included MSHP checks prior to hire and no documentation of an FCSR letter for several of them. The NA registry check was completed after hire for Caregiver II, Maintenance/Driver DD, and Dietary [NAME] EE, and there was no date of NA registry check in CNA GG’s file. During interview, the unit secretary said she was responsible for completing the required checks and that some NA registry checks were only completed after the state agency requested employee files. The administrator stated he expected the CBC, EDL, and NA registry checks to be completed prior to the employee’s hire date.
Meals Served at Unappetizing Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide each resident with a palatable meal served at appetizing temperatures. Residents reported that dinner trays served in their rooms were cold or did not taste good, including one resident who said dinner was normally eaten in the room and was cold by the time staff served it, and another who said evening room meals were warm but did not taste good. During the resident council meeting, several residents stated that their dinner food was cold when served as room trays. Record review showed 47 residents on a regular diet and 4 residents on a mechanical soft diet. On the dinner meal date, the facility’s temperature logs documented hot food temperatures on the steam table, including regular entree, mechanical soft entree, and starch items, but no recorded temperatures for the mechanical soft mashed potatoes or carrots. Observation showed food was plated, covered, placed on a cart, and then transported to resident halls before being served to rooms. When the test tray was checked after all residents had been served, the mechanical soft ground meat, mashed potatoes, carrots, regular sloppy joe, and steak fries were all measured at temperatures ranging from 96.1 F to 114.1 F and were described as cool or bland. The Dietary Manager stated hot foods should be served hot and cold foods cold, and the dietary staff member stated hot foods should be at 160 F on the steam table and served at least 140 F.
Failure to Implement Effective QAA Committee Oversight
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee to develop and track identified concerns for resolution. Review of the undated QAPI plan showed the facility expected the QAPI committee to meet monthly, prioritize activities, monitor improvement using a self-assessment, and implement performance improvement plan (PIP) topics based on data analysis. However, review of the last three QAA notes provided by the administrator showed the most recent meeting minutes were dated 09/30/25, and those minutes did not identify or address any quality assurance deficiencies. During interview on 10/01/25, the administrator stated he started in December 2024 and held monthly QAA committee meetings with sign-in sheets and minutes documented. He said the committee included himself, the DON at times, the Medical Director, dietary manager, maintenance director, social services director, and sometimes the MDS nurse. He also stated that department heads discussed issues that needed to be addressed during QAA, but those discussions were only verbal and no written PIPs were documented. He further stated he had not identified any areas of widespread deficient practice in any area related to quality of care or quality of life.
Improper Catheter and Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
Incontinent and catheter care were not provided in accordance with acceptable standards of practice for a resident with an indwelling catheter. The resident had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and neurogenic bladder, and was cognitively intact but dependent on staff for toileting transfer and partially to moderately dependent for toileting hygiene. The care plan directed staff to keep the catheter bag below bladder level, minimize contamination, and use a leg bag as appropriate. During observation, the resident’s urinary drainage bag was placed in a dignity bag under the wheelchair seat with the catheter tubing dragging on the floor, and the urine in the tubing was cloudy yellow with white sediment. During transfer and bed care, CNA H and CNA I raised the urinary drainage bag above the level of the bladder multiple times, including while attaching it for the mechanical lift transfer, while threading it through the resident’s pant leg, and while turning the resident on the bed. These actions caused urine to back flow toward the bladder and up the tubing. The urine remained cloudy yellow with white sediment during the observation. CNA H stated he/she was not aware the bag had been raised above bladder level, and the DON stated catheter tubing should not drag on the floor and the catheter bag should never be raised above bladder level to decrease the risk of back flow that could potentially cause a UTI.
Failure to Update Facility-Wide Assessment for Resource Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment to determine the necessary resources for competent resident care during both routine operations and emergencies. The facility census was 55 at the time of review. The only updated portion of the facility assessment as of 10/01/25 was the first page, which contained contact and licensing information, while the remainder of the assessment available for review was from 05/01/23 and contained outdated resident information. During an interview, the administrator acknowledged that the facility assessment had not been updated since his tenure began, citing other priorities, and confirmed that only the first page was updated after the annual survey had started.
Incomplete transfer/discharge notices and failure to notify the Ombudsman
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide complete written transfer/discharge notices for three residents who were sent to the hospital, and the notices did not include required information such as the reason for transfer/discharge, the resident’s appeal rights and appeal hearing contact information, or the contact information for the Ombudsman and the advocacy agencies for residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities or mental illness. The record review showed each of the three residents had a DPOA or family representative listed, and each was transferred out of the facility for acute changes in condition. For Resident #1, staff documented acute neurologic changes including slurred speech, right-sided weakness, and a droop to the mouth, and the resident was sent by EMS to the emergency department after the DPOA agreed. The transfer notice dated 09/01/25 stated only that verbal notice was given to the DPOA and did not contain the required written details. For Resident #2, staff documented confusion, lethargy, back and flank pain, and bloody diarrhea, followed by EMS transfer to the hospital; the notice dated 05/06/25 stated notice was provided to the DPOA but omitted the required transfer/discharge information. For Resident #3, staff documented fever, low oxygen saturation, and EMS transport for hypoxia; the notice dated 03/25/25 stated written notice was provided to the DPOA but also lacked the required content. The Ombudsman stated by email that the facility had not been sending information on residents transferred or discharged from the facility. During interview, the Social Services Director said she was not aware that transfer/discharge notices needed to be sent to the Ombudsman monthly and had not been sending them. She also stated she was not aware of some of the specific information that needed to be included on transfer/discharge notices and bed holds, and that she personally gave bed-hold information when available or followed up the next day, although nursing could also give a bed hold.
Failure to Maintain Accident-Free Environment and Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Surveyors observed that the environment contained hazards that could lead to resident accidents, and staff did not implement sufficient measures to monitor or protect residents from these risks. This deficiency was identified based on direct observations and findings during the survey, which indicated lapses in maintaining a safe environment and in providing necessary supervision to prevent accidents.
Failure to Timely Notify Physician of Resident's Pain After Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident's physician in a timely manner regarding the resident's complaints of hip pain following a fall. After the resident, who had a history of hemiplegia, muscle weakness, and limited range of motion, slid out of a shower chair and landed on the floor, staff documented the incident and noted initial complaints of right hip soreness. However, the physician was only notified that the resident had fallen, with no mention of the hip pain. The resident continued to complain of pain and received Tylenol twice on the day of the fall, but there was no documentation that the physician was informed of these ongoing complaints or the administration of pain medication. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that the resident's complaints of pain were not communicated to the physician at the time of the fall or when pain medication was administered. The resident's pain persisted, and it was not until two days later that the physician was notified of the pain, at which point an x-ray was ordered. The x-ray, performed three days after the fall, revealed a mildly displaced left femoral neck fracture. Facility protocols required nurses to notify physicians of any abnormal findings or complaints, ensuring thorough assessments and communication. Both the nurse practitioner and the Director of Nursing stated that they expected staff to notify the physician of any complaints of pain following a fall. The failure to communicate the resident's pain complaints and the need for pain medication to the physician resulted in a delay in diagnosis and treatment of the hip fracture.
Failure to Report Injury of Unknown Origin to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state survey agency for one resident who suffered a new fractured humeral shaft. The resident was admitted to the facility with a prior left humerus fracture and had not experienced any falls or trauma since admission, according to staff documentation and interviews. On a follow-up appointment, it was discovered that the resident had a new fracture requiring surgery, but staff believed it was related to the initial injury and did not recognize it as a new event. The LPN reported the finding to the DON and ADON, but the incident was not reported to the state agency as required by the facility's abuse prevention policy. Interviews with the DON, ADON, and Administrator revealed a lack of clarity regarding whether the fracture was new and whether it constituted an injury of unknown origin. The DON did not consider the fracture reportable due to insufficient information and the absence of witnessed incidents, while the Administrator was unaware it was a new fracture until the state agency's investigation. The facility's policy required immediate reporting of injuries of unknown source, but this was not followed in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 40 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hannibal
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Lawn Nursing Home | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 23 | 0 |
| Beloved Health And Rehabilitation Center | 6.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Beth Haven Nursing Home | 7.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Sunset Home | 12.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 2 |
| Good Samaritan Home | 13 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Luther Manor Retirement & Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.