Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Granby House during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents with intact cognitive skills, including one with mental health diagnoses, were only able to use a corded phone located at the nurses' station, where staff were frequently present and privacy was lacking. Staff confirmed that residents were routinely brought to this area for phone use, and there was no alternative location or cordless phone available, resulting in a failure to ensure private communication as required by facility policy.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering exited the facility unsupervised after the front door alarm was found to be turned off, resulting in a fall and injuries outside. Staff were unaware of the resident's whereabouts, and the facility lacked a specific policy for door alarms. The investigation into the incident was incomplete, failing to address the root cause or document how the resident was able to leave the building.
Staff did not consistently perform hand hygiene or use required gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities for several residents with wounds or indwelling devices. Multiple CNAs were observed providing care without washing or sanitizing hands before donning gloves, after glove removal, or between care tasks, and did not always wear gowns as required for EBP. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding of infection control protocols, and EBP signage was sometimes missing from resident rooms.
A resident with a history of hypothyroidism and other chronic conditions did not receive prescribed levothyroxine after admission because staff failed to enter the medication order into the electronic record. The medication card was present, but the omission went unnoticed until the resident reported not receiving the medication, and staff confirmed the error during interviews and record review.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents with MDROs or chronic wounds, resulting in staff not wearing appropriate PPE and lacking training on EBP. Additionally, the facility did not complete the required two-step TB screening for several staff members, with missing documentation for TB tests. Interviews revealed a lack of awareness and training among staff regarding EBP and TB screening procedures.
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen and dining areas, with issues such as dead bugs in light fixtures, a rusted prep table, and a dirty ice machine. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding maintenance responsibilities, and the cleaning schedule did not adequately address these issues.
The facility did not follow its abuse prevention policy by failing to conduct timely Nurse Aide (NA) Registry checks for Federal Indicators on new hires, including a Maintenance Supervisor, an RN, and an Interim DON. Interviews revealed a lack of clarity and training for the Medical Record Staff responsible for these checks.
The facility failed to provide adequate grooming and personal hygiene services to dependent residents, as evidenced by three residents who did not receive timely showers and had unkempt hair. One resident, who was cognitively intact, reported feeling unclean due to infrequent showers, while another with severe cognitive impairment also experienced infrequent showers despite needing substantial assistance. A third resident, in isolation, did not receive any showers during their stay, highlighting inconsistencies in the facility's scheduling and documentation processes.
The facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed their CNA training and certification within the required timeframe, resulting in eighteen aides working without proper certification. The facility's policy requires completion within four months, but delays in class availability and lack of enforcement led to aides working beyond this period. The administration acknowledged the issue but did not effectively implement reassignment or termination policies.
The facility's pest control program was ineffective, leading to a fly infestation affecting residents and common areas. Observations showed flies around residents and in dining areas, causing discomfort. Staff interviews confirmed frequent complaints, and despite pest control measures, the issue persisted.
A resident with major depressive disorder and other conditions did not receive routine showers since admission, as the facility lacked a consistent shower schedule and proper documentation. Staff interviews revealed confusion about the shower schedule and inadequate reporting of missed showers, leading to the resident feeling unclean and neglected.
A facility failed to complete the required PASARR screening for a resident with mental health diagnoses prior to or at admission, resulting in a significant delay. The Social Services Director, new to the position, did not complete the screening, and the Administrator acknowledged the oversight, indicating a lapse in the facility's process.
A resident did not receive scheduled lab tests in a timely manner due to the facility's failure to follow professional standards of practice. The resident, with a history of various medical conditions and on anticoagulant medication, had orders for lab tests every three months. However, the facility missed the scheduled tests in May. Interviews revealed inconsistencies in the process for tracking and obtaining lab tests, with staff unsure about the use of a newly implemented lab tracking book and the functionality of the computer system for recurring orders.
The facility failed to ensure proper communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for a resident with end-stage renal disease. Despite the care plan indicating dialysis sessions and transportation coordination, there was no documentation of communication or follow-up with the dialysis center. Interviews revealed that communication forms were not used or returned, contrary to the expectations of the Corporate Nurse and Administrator.
The facility staff failed to provide cornbread or a substitute to two residents on pureed diets during a meal, despite it being listed on the menu. The dietary aide forgot to puree the cornbread, and the dietary manager and registered dietician were unaware of the issue. Facility policy requires that residents on pureed diets receive the same food options as those on regular diets.
A resident's fentanyl patch went missing after a former CNA entered the facility and was seen leaving the resident's room. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and on a pain medication regimen, was found with their gown sleeve pulled down and the patch missing. Staff identified the former CNA through camera footage and personal observation.
Failure to Provide Private Telephone Access for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with reasonable access to a telephone in a private environment, as required by their own policy and resident rights. Observations and interviews revealed that the only available phone for resident use was a corded phone located at the nurses' station, an area with frequent staff presence and activity. Residents reported that they were unable to take the phone elsewhere, and staff and other individuals were often present during their calls, resulting in a lack of privacy. Staff interviews confirmed that residents were routinely brought to the nurses' desk to use the phone, and that there was no alternative location for private phone use. The facility previously had a cordless phone, but it was no longer available, and staff were unaware of its whereabouts. Two residents with intact cognitive skills, one with a history of schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit, and another with depression and anxiety disorder, specifically reported feeling that their phone conversations were not private and that staff could overhear their discussions. Staff acknowledged the lack of privacy and the high traffic at the nurses' station, and the administrator confirmed that there was no privacy for residents using the phone at that location. The deficiency was identified through observation, record review, and interviews with residents and staff.
Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Disabled Door Alarm
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe environment free from accident hazards when the front door alarm was found to be turned off, allowing a resident to exit the building unsupervised. The resident, who had a history of severe cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, dementia, repeated falls, and was identified as a wanderer, was able to leave the facility without staff knowledge. The resident was later found outside on the parking lot pavement with injuries, including a bleeding abrasion to the back of the head and bruising to the right shoulder. Staff interviews confirmed that the door alarm did not sound and the door was not locked at the time of the incident, and the alarm system was later found unplugged by the DON. The resident's care plan documented poor safety awareness, a risk for falls, and a tendency to wander, with interventions such as frequent rounding and reminders to the resident. Despite these interventions, staff were unaware of the resident's whereabouts for a period of time, and the resident was able to exit the building without detection. Staff interviews indicated that the resident was last seen in the hallway and a search was initiated only after the resident was noticed missing. The facility did not have a specific policy regarding door alarms and locking mechanisms, and staff were unclear about the procedures for monitoring doors when alarms were not functioning. Following the incident, documentation and investigation into the root cause of the elopement and fall were incomplete. The fall documentation checklist did not address how the resident exited the facility or the circumstances leading to the fall outside. There was no evidence of a comprehensive investigation or root cause analysis to determine how the door alarm became disabled or to identify interventions to prevent future incidents. The facility's policy on accident and incident investigation was not fully followed, as key data and analysis were missing from the report.
Failure to Follow Hand Hygiene and Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to adhere to established infection prevention and control protocols, specifically regarding hand hygiene and the use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices. Multiple instances were observed where certified nurse aides (CNAs) did not perform hand hygiene before donning gloves, after glove removal, or between resident care activities. For example, CNAs were seen entering resident rooms, putting on gloves without washing or sanitizing their hands, and proceeding to provide direct care such as dressing, perineal care, and transferring residents. In several cases, staff also failed to change gloves or perform hand hygiene between different care tasks, and sometimes handled resident personal items or equipment without appropriate hand hygiene. The facility also failed to ensure proper implementation of EBP for residents with wounds or indwelling devices. Staff did not consistently wear gowns as required during high-contact care activities for residents on EBP, despite facility policy and CDC guidance. Observations included staff providing care to residents with wounds or surgical sites without donning protective gowns, and in some cases, EBP signage was missing from resident doors. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding of EBP requirements, with some staff indicating they would only wear gowns if instructed by a nurse, and others unaware of the location of necessary PPE or the identity of the facility's Infection Preventionist. The deficiencies were observed among residents with significant care needs, including those with chronic wounds, surgical sites, and indwelling devices, who required assistance with activities of daily living such as dressing, toileting, and transfers. The facility census at the time was 51. Despite facility policies outlining clear expectations for hand hygiene and EBP, and the availability of hand hygiene products and PPE, staff did not consistently follow these protocols during resident care, as confirmed by direct observation, staff interviews, and record review.
Failure to Administer Prescribed Levothyroxine Due to Admission Process Error
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of quality by not administering a resident's prescribed levothyroxine for hypothyroidism as ordered. Upon admission, the resident, who had a history of systemic lupus erythematosus, epilepsy, hypothyroidism, major depression, and anxiety, was transferred from another facility with a documented physician's order for levothyroxine 88 mcg daily. However, review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and physician's orders revealed that the medication was not entered into the electronic medical record or administered until several weeks after admission. Interviews with staff indicated that the medication was overlooked during the admission process. The nurse responsible for entering medications into the electronic record failed to include levothyroxine, and the usual double-check process by the DON and ADON was not completed for this resident. The resident reported not receiving the medication, and staff confirmed that the medication card with levothyroxine was present but not administered, as the order was not in the system for the night nurse to follow. The facility's policy required medications to be administered as ordered and for medication errors to be documented and reviewed. In this case, the failure to verify and enter the resident's medication order resulted in the omission of a routine and necessary medication for hypothyroidism, as confirmed by both staff interviews and record review.
Inadequate Infection Control and TB Screening in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a complete infection prevention and control program by not implementing their policy regarding enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents infected with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) or those with chronic wounds and/or indwelling medical devices. Staff were not trained on EBP, and personal protective equipment (PPE) and signage were not present for residents meeting the guidelines for EBP. Specifically, staff did not wear PPE in accordance with CDC guidelines for a resident with a cutaneous abscess and knee effusion, who required wound care. Observations revealed that staff assisted the resident without wearing gowns, and there was no signage or PPE available outside the resident's room. Interviews with staff, including CNAs, LPNs, and the interim Director of Nursing, indicated a lack of training and awareness regarding EBP. Staff were not informed about the necessity of wearing gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities, such as wound care, for residents with wounds or indwelling devices. The facility's infection control policy had been updated to include EBP, but it was not yet implemented, and staff had not been educated on the process. Additionally, the facility failed to administer the required two-step tuberculosis (TB) screening test for six sampled staff members. Personnel records showed missing documentation for the first or second step TB skin tests for several employees. Interviews with the Corporate Nurse and Administrator revealed that the former Director of Nursing was responsible for completing employee TB skin tests, but the facility had experienced turnover in this position, leading to lapses in TB screening documentation.
Sanitation and Maintenance Deficiencies in Kitchen and Dining Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment in the kitchen and dining areas, as evidenced by several deficiencies observed during a survey. Light fixtures in these areas contained dead bugs, were not clean, and some were missing covers or not functioning. The facility's cleaning schedule did not include tasks for cleaning or maintaining these lights, and staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the maintenance of these fixtures. The Dietary Manager and Maintenance Director were unaware of the issues, and there was no systematic process for reporting or addressing such maintenance needs. Additionally, the lower shelf of the prep table in the kitchen was found to be in poor condition, with visible grime, rust, and missing coating. Despite a cleaning schedule that included wiping down the prep table, staff interviews indicated that the table's condition was known but inadequately addressed. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the issue but relied on temporary measures like covering the table with plastic sheets, which did not resolve the underlying problem of rust and grime accumulation. The facility also failed to maintain the cleanliness of the ice machine and the stock room floor. The outside of the ice machine had white streaks and lint on the vent, with no clear responsibility assigned for its cleaning. Housekeeping and kitchen staff had conflicting views on who was responsible, leading to neglect. Similarly, the stock room floor was dirty, with no specific cleaning tasks outlined in the schedule. Staff interviews highlighted a lack of documentation and oversight in ensuring these areas were cleaned, with the Dietary Manager and Administrator acknowledging the oversight but not implementing effective solutions.
Failure to Conduct Timely NA Registry Checks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its abuse prevention policy by not conducting timely checks of the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry for Federal Indicators, which are markers for potential employees who have committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents. Specifically, the facility did not check the NA registry for two staff members, the Maintenance Supervisor and a Registered Nurse (RN), prior to their employment. Additionally, the NA registry check for the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted six months after their hire date. These oversights occurred despite the facility's policy requiring registry checks before employment. Interviews with the Medical Record Staff revealed a lack of clarity and training regarding the process for conducting NA registry checks. The Medical Record Staff was unsure if the Maintenance Supervisor's registry check was necessary and could not locate documentation for the RN's check. Furthermore, the registry check for the Interim DON was delayed because the Medical Record Staff initially only consulted the nurse website. The Administrator confirmed that the Medical Record Staff was responsible for these checks and expected them to be completed before new employees began working.
Failure to Provide Adequate Hygiene Services to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate grooming and personal hygiene services to dependent residents, as evidenced by the cases of three residents who did not receive timely showers and had unkempt hair. Resident #7, who was cognitively intact and required assistance with mobility and transfers, reported feeling unclean due to infrequent showers. The resident's care plan indicated a need for assistance with bathing, yet documentation showed significant gaps between showers, with the resident receiving only two showers in June 2024. Interviews revealed that the resident preferred weekly showers, but the new shower aide did not consistently offer them. Resident #29, who had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance with personal hygiene, also experienced infrequent showers. The resident's care plan highlighted the need for assistance with daily activities, yet documentation showed only two showers in June 2024. Observations confirmed the resident's hair was unkempt, and interviews with staff indicated that the resident did not refuse showers, suggesting a failure in the facility's scheduling and documentation processes. Resident #246, who had moderately impaired cognition and required assistance with bathing, did not receive any showers during their stay from early June until discharge. The resident was in isolation, and staff interviews revealed a lack of documentation for any bed baths offered. The facility's interim DON acknowledged the oversight, indicating a breakdown in communication and procedure adherence. Interviews with various staff members, including CNAs and LPNs, highlighted inconsistencies in the shower schedule and documentation, contributing to the deficiency in resident care.
Failure to Ensure Timely Completion of CNA Training and Certification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed their training, competencies, and testing within the required timeframe, resulting in eighteen nurse aides continuing to work without completing a state-approved certified nursing assistant (CNA) training program, competency evaluation, and certification test. The facility's policy mandates that nurse aides must complete their training and competency evaluation within four months of employment, or they may be reassigned to non-nursing roles or terminated. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, allowing nurse aides to work beyond the four-month period without the necessary certification. Interviews and record reviews revealed that several nurse aides had not completed their final written/oral exams and practicum exams, despite having started the program months earlier. The Clinical Instructor was unaware of the 120-day regulatory timeframe for course completion and mentioned that students could work as nurse aides for up to a year while waiting to take their tests. This lack of awareness and enforcement of the regulatory timeframe contributed to the deficiency, as nurse aides continued to work without completing their required training and certification. The facility's administration acknowledged the delay in training and attributed it to a lack of available classes, which caused staff to wait up to four months to start the program. The administration stated that if the course is not completed within the required timeframe, nurse aides would be reassigned to non-nursing roles or terminated. However, this policy was not effectively implemented, leading to the deficiency where nurse aides continued to provide direct care without proper certification.
Ineffective Pest Control Program Leads to Fly Infestation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in a significant fly infestation affecting residents and common areas. Observations revealed multiple instances where flies were present around residents, including one resident who experienced flies landing on their arm and food, and another resident who had to swat flies away from their face. The issue was prevalent in the dining room and hallways, with several flies observed buzzing around while residents ate their meals. Interviews with residents confirmed that flies had been a persistent problem, causing discomfort and annoyance. Staff interviews highlighted the inadequacy of the current pest control measures. Housekeeping and nursing staff reported frequent complaints from residents about flies, and staff resorted to using fly swatters to manage the situation. The Maintenance Director acknowledged the severity of the fly problem and mentioned that the pest control company had visited recently but was still working on a solution. Despite the presence of bug lights and blowers, the facility's efforts were insufficient to control the fly population effectively, as evidenced by the ongoing complaints and observations.
Failure to Provide Routine Showers to Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to uphold a resident's right to self-determination by not providing routine baths or showers to a resident, identified as Resident #196, since their admission. The resident, who has diagnoses including major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, and pain, was observed to have unkempt hair and facial hair, and expressed feeling unclean and wanting to be shaved. The resident's care plan, which was revised, did not specify the preferred frequency of showers or baths, and the shower sheets from the time of admission showed no documentation of showers being offered or provided. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of a consistent shower schedule and inadequate communication regarding shower refusals or completions. A CNA mentioned that the facility did not have a clear shower schedule and that refusals were not reported but rather attempted again later. Another CNA and an LPN were unaware of the shower schedule, and the LPN noted that residents had complained about missed showers. The interim DON and Corporate Nurse expected showers to be documented and reported if not completed, but there was a disconnect in the process, as evidenced by the resident's unmet needs.
Failure to Complete Timely PASARR Screening
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete the required Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident prior to or at the time of admission. This deficiency was identified for one resident out of five sampled, who was admitted with diagnoses including recurrent major depressive disorder, dementia, bipolar disease, and Parkinson's Disease. The PASARR form, which is crucial for ensuring appropriate care and services, was completed almost six months after the resident's admission, indicating a significant delay in the screening process. Interviews with the Social Services Director (SSD) and the Administrator revealed that the hospital typically initiates the PASARR or level one screening, and if a level II screening is needed, the resident should remain in the hospital until it is completed. However, in this case, the SSD did not complete the PASARR upon the resident's admission, as they had only been in the position for ten months. The Administrator confirmed that the level one screening should have been completed at the time of admission, highlighting a lapse in the facility's process for ensuring timely completion of PASARR screenings.
Failure to Obtain Timely Lab Tests for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all residents received care according to professional standards of practice, as evidenced by the failure to obtain ordered blood tests in a timely manner for one resident. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a history of hearing loss, osteoarthritis, cerebral atherosclerosis, anemia, and a personal history of transient cerebral ischemic attack. The resident was on anticoagulant medication and had a physician's order for a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), complete blood count (CBC), and lipid tests to be drawn every three months. However, the facility did not obtain these labs as scheduled in May, following the last draw in February. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and consistency in the process for tracking and obtaining lab tests. A Certified Medication Technician (CMT) confirmed that the last labs were completed in February, and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) noted that the facility had recently implemented a lab tracking book to manage lab orders. However, there was uncertainty about whether the book included ongoing orders or only new ones. The LPN also mentioned that the computer system was supposed to notify staff when labs were due, but it was unclear how this functioned for recurring orders. Further interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Corporate Nurse highlighted that the facility had recently introduced a lab tracking binder to ensure lab orders were followed. However, it was acknowledged that the system for monitoring lab orders was not being effectively utilized, as evidenced by the missed lab draw in May. The DON and Corporate Nurse confirmed that the medical records system did not provide notifications for lab draws, which necessitated the implementation of the lab draw binder to track and ensure compliance with lab orders.
Failure to Communicate with Dialysis Center
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all dialysis residents received services consistent with professional standards of practice by not routinely communicating and collaborating with the dialysis center after appointments. This deficiency was identified for one resident, who was diagnosed with end-stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, and muscle weakness. The resident's care plan indicated dialysis sessions on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, with the facility responsible for coordinating transportation. However, the medical record lacked documentation of communication between the facility and the dialysis center, and there was no evidence of follow-up contact after each dialysis visit. Interviews with the resident, transportation staff, and nursing staff revealed that communication forms were not being used or returned from dialysis appointments. The resident confirmed not taking a form to appointments, and transportation staff did not carry any communication forms. Licensed Practical Nurses acknowledged that forms were not sent with the resident, and the dialysis company did not return them. The Corporate Nurse and Administrator both expected communication forms to be completed and returned, but none were found for the resident's dialysis appointments.
Failure to Provide Pureed Menu Items to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to follow approved menus for residents on pureed diets by not providing cornbread or a comparable substitute during a meal. This deficiency was observed when two residents, who were on pureed diets, did not receive the cornbread listed on the menu for the noon meal. The dietary aide responsible for preparing the meal admitted to forgetting to puree the cornbread, resulting in the residents not receiving it. The facility's policy requires that all pureed food must be used to deliver the correct nutrient density to each resident, and residents on pureed diets should receive the same food options as those on regular diets. The report highlights that the dietary staff, including the dietary manager and registered dietician, were unaware of the issue until it was brought to their attention. Interviews with the dietary aides and the dietary manager revealed that there is a book in the kitchen detailing how to puree all foods, and residents on pureed diets should receive the same foods as those on regular diets, considering their preferences and orders. However, the oversight in providing pureed cornbread was not communicated to the registered dietician or the administrator, who both emphasized the importance of following the menu and ensuring all residents receive the same food choices.
Misappropriation of Resident's Fentanyl Patch by Former Employee
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of property when a fentanyl patch went missing. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and had a history of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, shoulder disorder, depression, and convulsions, was on a scheduled pain medication regimen. The resident's care plan included managing pain medication for optimum control and observing for non-verbal signs of pain. On the day of the incident, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documented the placement of a fentanyl patch on the resident's left upper arm. Later that day, camera footage showed a former employee, identified as a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), entering the facility through the back door and heading towards the resident's hall. The LPN reported seeing someone run out of the resident's room and out the back door. The LPN and another CNA identified the individual as the former CNA. Upon checking the resident, they found the left gown sleeve pulled down and the fentanyl patch missing, with a slight red outline where the patch had been. Interviews with staff confirmed the procedure for checking the placement of pain patches every shift and documenting their location. The nursing staff also confirmed that the resident's pain patches do not come off easily, and the resident usually refuses to change positions in bed. The Administrator was notified of the incident and confirmed the identity of the former employee through camera footage and staff statements.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 51 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Granby
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicalodges Neosho | 9.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Sarcoxie Health Care Center | 12.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Nhc Healthcare, Joplin | 15.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| St Luke's Nursing And Rehabilitation | 16.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Aspire Senior Living Carthage | 16.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Granby House.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.